LACE versus BEAM conditioning in relapsed and refractory lymphoma transplant: retrospective multicenter analysis of toxicity and efficacy

Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Adult Hodgkin Lymphoma at a Tertiary Care Center in India: Analysis of Outcomes and Prognostic Factors

High-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) is the standard of care treatment in relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma (rrHL). Published long-term follow-up data concerning this modality from the Indian subcontinent is lacking. In this retrospective study, the data on adults (> 16 years) with biopsy-confirmed rrHL who were autografted from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2021 at our transplant unit were analyzed. Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as time from transplant to disease progression or death due to any cause. Overall survival (OS) was determined from date of transplant to date of death due to any cause. Overall, 134 patients with Hodgkin lymphoma underwent ASCT. At a median follow-up of 38.2 (range, 0.1-240) months, 5 years PFS was 45.3% (95% CI 35.4-54.4). The probability of OS at 5 years was 60.5% (95% CI 49.6-69.6). Eleven (8.2%) patients suffered transplant-related mortality by 100 days. Post-transplant persistent disease, pre-transplant serum hypoalbuminemia (< 3.5 g/dl) and chemo-resistance (< PR after last salvage regimen) of tumour at transplant were independent prognostic factors associated with worse PFS in multivariable analysis. Likewise, age ≥ 30 years, ECOG performance status ≥ 1 and residual disease after transplantation correlated with inferior OS. Long-term outcomes of rrHL patients undergoing ASCT in India match those from the developed world in the era of peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Pre-transplant performance status, chemo-sensitivity of disease, serum albumin and post-transplant remission status determined survival in our cohort.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12288-023-01690-x.

Comparison of efficacy and toxicity according to etoposide and cytarabine dosing in BEAM conditioning followed by autologous stem cell transplantation in Hodgkin lymphoma

The combination of carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan (BEAM) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is a commonly used intensification regimen for patients with Hodgkin lymphoma. As etoposide and cytarabine dosing are not defined, we conducted a retrospective, multicenter study, to compare efficacy and toxicity in 130 patients with Hodgkin lymphoma receiving etoposide and cytarabine at either 200 mg/m2/d (n = 50), 400 mg/m2/d (n = 35), or etoposide 200 mg/m2/d and cytarabine 400 mg/m2/d (n = 45). Progression-free survival and overall survival were not associated with the intensity of conditioning. Increased conditioning intensity was associated with longer duration of thrombocytopenia, a higher number of transfused RBC and platelet units and a higher frequency of mucositis, but serious adverse events or infectious complications were not increased. The intensity of BEAM regimen was not associated with survival but with the rate of cytopenia and mucositis advocating for the use of lower dosing in frail patients.

Fotemustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and cyclophosphamide (FEAC) conditioning regimen for autologous stem cell transplantation in lymphoma

To investigate the efficacy and safety of the FEAC (fotemustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and cyclophosphamide) conditioning regimen for the treatment of lymphoma, we retrospectively analyzed the records of 76 Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) patients who underwent autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) after the FEAC conditioning regimen. Their survival, as well as the clinical efficacy, hematopoietic engraftment time, and toxicity, were analyzed. One patient died of severe pulmonary infection, and the transplant-related mortality (TRM) was 1.3% (1/76). Hematopoietic engraftment was achieved successfully in the remaining 75 patients. The median times of neutrophil and platelet engraftment were 11 d (6-21 d) and 13 d (8-24 d), respectively. The 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 69.1%, and the 2-year overall survival (OS) rate was 84.2%. FEAC conditioning regimen has acceptable toxicity, and the prognosis of patients is good, making it a feasible alternative to the BEAM regimen for ASCT.

Long-Term Outcomes and Safety Trends of Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Report From A Tertiary Care Center in India

Published experience with autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) in non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) from the Indian subcontinent is extremely limited. Here, we describe the activity and outcomes of this treatment modality at a large tertiary care center in India.

Efficacy and toxicity of SEAM (semustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan) conditioning regimen followed by autologous stem cell transplantation in lymphoma

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of SEAM regimen followed by auto-SCT in lymphoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients with lymphoma who underwent auto-SCT with SEAM conditioning regimen from January 2010 to June 2018 at our centre. In total, 97 patients were analysed.

RESULTS

The median time to neutrophil engraftment and platelet engraftment was 9.5 days (range, 7-15 days) and 12 days (range, 7-25 days), respectively. Grade 3-4 nausea/vomiting, mucositis and diarrhoea were observed in 21.6%, 36.1%, and 11.3% of patients, respectively. Treatment-related mortality at 100 days occurred in 2 patients (2.1%). After a median follow-up time of 53.9 months, the 3-year incidence of disease relapse or progression was 34%. The estimated progression-free survival and overall survival at 3 years were 62% and 75%, respectively. Compared with previous studies using BEAM as the conditioning regimen, this study shows that the SEAM regimen has a comparable efficacy and safety profile.

CONCLUSIONS

The SEAM regimen is feasible and might be an ideal alternative to BEAM regimen for lymphoma auto-SCT.

Outcome of CBV (Carmustine, Cyclophosphamide, Etoposide) Conditioning Regimen for Autologous Stem Cell Transplant in Lymphoma: A Retrospective Study from a Tertiary Cancer Center in South India

Background In autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) for lymphomas, no standard conditioning regimen has been defined so far. Thus, the choice is guided by the center's familiarity and experience with a particular regimen.

Objective To determine the response, toxicity, and survival outcomes in lymphoma patients who underwent ASCT with CBV (cyclophosphamide, carmustine, and etoposide) conditioning regimen.

Materials and Methods Between January 2013 and May 2019, 45 consecutive lymphoma patients who had ASCT with CBV conditioning regimen were included in this retrospective study. CBV consisted of cyclophosphamide (1.5 g/m2/day × 4 days), carmustine (300 mg/m2 × 1 day), and etoposide (125 mg/m2 twice daily × 3 days). Baseline characteristics, pre transplant response, apheresis, post-transplant toxicities, post-transplant response, and survival outcomes were collected. Endpoints were toxicity, response, event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS).

Results The median age was 30 (range: 6–64) years. Diagnosis was Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) in 26 (58%) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) in 19 (42%). Forty-three patients (95%) had chemosensitive disease; 22(49%) in CR, and 21 (46%) in PR. The median CD34 was 2.95 × 106/kg (range: 0.9–9.56). The median time to neutrophil engraftment was 11 days (9–23) and 13 (8–36) days for platelets. All patients had febrile neutropenia, clinically and/or microbiologically documented infection was seen in 75% of patients. The most common grade 3/4 toxicities were mucositis (n = 4, 9%), diarrhea (n = 4, 9%), and nausea/vomiting (n = 2, 4%). The average days of hospitalization was 18 (range: 10–37). Day 100 mortality was 6.6% (n = 3). The median follow-up was 44.8 months. The median EFS for the entire cohort was 23.8 months; for HL, the median EFS was not reached, and for NHL, it was 7.97 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.57–14.37). The median OS for the entire cohort and for HL was not reached; for NHL, it was 24.3 months (95% CI: 0.56–48.11).

Conclusion CBV conditioning regimen was well tolerated with low grade 3/4 toxicities and efficacy comparable to literature data.

Disease Status at Transplant has a Significant Impact on Outcomes of Autologous Transplantation (ASCT) in Patients with Hodgkin Lymphoma—A Single Center Experience

High dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation is the treatment of choice for relapsed Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). We analyzed 100 consecutive patients who underwent ASCT at our center between January 1999 and June 2019 for relapsed or refractory disease with a median age of 28 years (range: 9-65). At ASCT, 59 were in complete remission (CR) while 31 achieved partial remission (PR) and 10 had refractory disease (RD). Most had BEAM conditioning with a median infused cell dose of 4.84 × 10⁶ CD 34 cells/kg. Prompt engraftment occurred in 97 patients at a median of 11 days. The day 100 transplant related mortality (TRM) was 5%. At a median of 37 months follow up, 79 patients are alive while 34 have relapsed. The 3-year event free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) are 62.3 ± 0.5% and 77.9 ± 4.4% respectively. The 3-year OS for patients in CR, PR and RD were 83.0 ± 5.2%, 78.4 ± 8.1% and 38.9 ± 1.7 respectively [p = 0.007] while the 3-year EFS for CR, PR and RD were 73.1 ± 6.2%, 61.3 ± 9.2% and 25.0 ± 1.5 respectively [p = 0.005]. Only disease status at time of ASCT was found to correlate with both OS and EFS. ASCT for HL is associated with good outcomes and low TRM. Disease status at ASCT impacted both OS and EFS and strategies to improve outcomes in patients with refractory disease needs to be explored.

LEAM vs. BEAM vs. CLV Conditioning Regimen for Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Malignant Lymphomas. Retrospective Comparison of Toxicity and Efficacy on 222 Patients in the First 100 Days After Transplant, On Behalf of the Romanian Society for Bone Marrow Transplantation

High-dose chemotherapy (HDT) followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is widely used in patients with malignant lymphomas. In Europe over 8,000 ASCTs for lymphoma were performed out of a total of 40,000 transplants according to the European Bone Marrow Transplant (EBMT) activity survey in 2017. ASCT is considered the standard treatment for eligible patients failing to achieve remission after first line chemotherapy or patients with relapsed or refractory lymphomas, including classical Hodkin's lymphoma, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma, and follicular lymphoma, as well as consolidation therapy in first remission in mantle cell lymphoma. BEAM (BCNU/carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan) is the most commonly used conditioning regimen for ASCT in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) lymphomas in Europe, whereas the CBV (cyclophosphamide, BCNU, and etoposide) regimen is also widely used in North America. Recently, concerns regarding BCNU toxicity as well as restricted availability of BCNU and melphalan has determined an increasing number of transplant centers to use alternative conditioning regimens. Currently, only a few comparative studies, most of them retrospective, between different conditioning protocols regarding efficacy and toxicity have been published. Thus, in the current manuscript, we report the experience of 2 transplant centers in ASCT in R/R lymphomas with three types of conditioning: BEAM, CLV (cyclophosphamide, lomustine, etoposide) and LEAM (lomustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan), with the aim to evaluate the results of alternative conditioning regimens using lomustine (LEAM and CLV) and compare them with the standard BEAM regarding early toxicity, engraftment, and transplant related mortality (TRM). All patients developed grade IV neutropenia, anemia with/without transfusion necessity. Severe thrombocytopenia with transfusion requirements is reported in most cases. Median time to platelet engraftment and neutrophil engraftment was 13 days (range) and 10 days (range), respectively. Gastrointestinal toxicity was the most common non-hematologic toxicity after all three conditioning regimens. Oral mucositis in various grades from I to IV was diagnosed in most cases. Other side effects include vomiting, diarrhea, colitis, and skin rash but with low severity grades. For the LEAM arm, one patient died after transplant, before engrafting, one patient didn't achieve platelet engraftment in day 100, one patient developed grade 3 upper gastrointestinal bleeding, one patient died (grade 5 toxicity) with acute renal failure, one patient developed hypoxic events up to grade 4 acute respiratory failure and one patient developed grade 3 itchy skin rash. For the CLV arm, one patient died after transplant, before engrafting, one patient developed grade 3 colitis, one patient with grade 3 hepatic cytolysis, one patient with cardiac toxicity followed by death (grade 5) caused by an acute myocardial infarction with ST elevation and one patient with pulmonary toxicity clinically manifested with grade 3 pleurisy. For the BEAM arm, one patient developed grade 3 cardiac toxicity with sinus bradycardia and afterwards grade 4 with acute pulmonary edema, three patients presented a grade 3 pruritic skin rash and two patients developed grade 3 seizures. In the present study we presented the differences that were observed between BEAM, LEAM, and CLV conditioning regimens offering clinical arguments for an SCT practitioner choice in the ideal situation, but also of choice for alternative regimens in the case that one regimen cannot be used.

Gemcitabine, vinorelbine and dexamethasone: A safe and effective regimen for treatment of relapsed/refractory hodgkin's lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Salvage regimens in relapsed/refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) differ in their efficacy and toxicity profiles. Gemcitabine (G), vinorelbine (V) and liposomal doxorubicin (GVDoxil) is one regimen with high response rates but has high toxicity and cost. We devised a regimen of GVDex by substituting the more expensive liposomal doxorubicin with the cheaper high-dose dexamethasone (Dex).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We analyzed the data of 48 adult and paediatric patients of relapsed/refractory HL who received GVDex as salvage therapy. GVDex was delivered as outpatient once in 3 weeks (Q3 weekly) (G 1000 mg/m² IV over 30 min on D1, 8; V 25 mg^/m² IV fast infusion on D1, 8; Dex40 mg PO D1-4) for 2-3 cycles. We present the overall response rate, toxicity, progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from the time of start of GVDex.

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients [median age: 24 years (5-63)] received GVDex [(median cycles:3(1-6)] in this period. Median time from diagnosis to the first relapse was 18.9 (2-119) months. Overall response rate [ORR = complete (CR)+partial (PR)] was 63%. Eleven (23%) patients developed febrile neutropenia. After a median follow-up of 20 months, the Kaplan-Meier estimates of patients alive and progression-free at 24 months were 60% and 49%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The response rates with GVDex were comparable to those reported with GVDoxil when used as a first-line salvage regimen in relapsed/refractory HL. It was an effective regimen even in patients who failed 2 lines of therapy for HL.

Outcome after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

OBJECTIVE

For more than two decades, high-dose chemotherapy (HDT) and autologous blood stem cell transplantation (ABSCT) were treatment options for patients with aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (B-NHL). However, the ideal timing and the collective patient benefits are still being debated.

METHOD

We retrospectively analyzed the data of 163 patients with B-NHL who received an HDT protocol followed by ABSCT between 2001 and 2007. Patients were analyzed according to the time point of HDT/ABSCT to compare upfront (directly after induction, n = 72, 44%) versus secondary transplantation (at first relapse, n = 91, 56%).

RESULTS

The overall response rate was 100% and 94% after upfront and secondary HDT/ABSCT, respectively. No significant differences were found for hematopoietic recovery and toxicity profile. The progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) probability were found to be significantly higher in the upfront HDT/ABSCT treatment group (P = .018 and P = .004). In multivariate analysis, upfront HDT/ABSCT and low IPI risk score had a significant beneficial effect on OS (P = .031 and P = .019).

CONCLUSION

HDT and ABSCT directly after induction chemotherapy were confirmed to be feasible with high PFS and OS rates. In addition, for patients with relapse after first-line therapy and consecutively poor prognosis, HDT/ABSCT also offers an effective treatment strategy.