1
|
Jo T, Arai Y, Kondo T, Mizuno S, Hirabayashi S, Inamoto Y, Doki N, Fukuda T, Ozawa Y, Katayama Y, Kanda Y, Fukushima K, Matsuoka KI, Takada S, Sawa M, Ashida T, Onizuka M, Ichinohe T, Atsuta Y, Kanda J, Yanada M. Advantages of peripheral blood stem cells from unrelated donors versus bone marrow transplants in outcomes of adult acute myeloid leukemia patients. Cytotherapy 2022; 24:1013-1025. [PMID: 35729020 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2022.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2022] [Revised: 05/17/2022] [Accepted: 05/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AIMS In allogeneic stem cell transplantation, unrelated donors are chosen in cases where appropriate related donors are not available. Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) are more often selected as a graft source than bone marrow (BM). However, the prognostic benefits of PBSCs versus BM transplants from unrelated donors have not been carefully examined in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). This study compared outcomes of adult AML patients who underwent unrelated PBSC and BM transplantation, evaluating post-transplant complications, including engraftment, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and infections, and determined subgroups of patients who are most likely to benefit from unrelated PBSCs compared with BM transplants. METHODS The authors analyzed 2962 adult AML patients who underwent unrelated PBSC or BM transplants between 2011 and 2018 (221 PBSC and 2741 BM) using the Japanese nationwide registry database, in which graft source selection is not skewed toward PBSCs. RESULTS In 49.7% of patients, disease status at transplantation was first complete remission (CR1). In 57.1% of cases, HLA-matched donors were selected. Myeloablative conditioning was performed in 75.1% of cases, and anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) was added to conditioning in 10.5%. Multivariate analyses showed a trend toward favorable non-relapse mortality (NRM) in PBSC recipients compared with BM recipients (hazard ratio [HR], 0.731, P = 0.096), whereas overall survival (OS) (HR, 0.959, P = 0.230) and disease-free survival (DFS) (HR, 0.868, P = 0.221) were comparable between PBSC and BM recipients. Although the rate of chronic GVHD (cGVHD) was significantly higher in PBSC patients (HR, 1.367, P = 0.016), NRM was not increased, mainly as a result of significantly reduced risk of bacterial infections (HR, 0.618, P = 0.010), reflecting more prompt engraftments in PBSC recipients. Subgroup analyses revealed that PBSC transplantation was advantageous in patients transplanted at CR1 and in those without ATG use. PBSC recipients experienced significantly better OS and/or DFS compared with BM recipients in this patient group. CONCLUSIONS The authors' results confirmed the overall safety of unrelated PBSC transplantation for adult AML patients and suggested an advantage of PBSCs, especially for those in CR1. Further optimization of the prophylactic strategy for cGVHD is required to improve the overall outcome in transplantation from unrelated PBSC donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomoyasu Jo
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan; Center for Research and Application of Cellular Therapy, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yasuyuki Arai
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan; Center for Research and Application of Cellular Therapy, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
| | - Tadakazu Kondo
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Shohei Mizuno
- Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Aichi Medical University, Nagakute, Japan
| | - Shigeki Hirabayashi
- Division of Precision Medicine, Kyusyu University School of Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Inamoto
- Department of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Noriko Doki
- Hematology Division, Komagome Hospital, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takahiro Fukuda
- Department of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yukiyasu Ozawa
- Department of Hematology, Japanese Red Cross Nagoya First Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Yuta Katayama
- Department of Hematology, Hiroshima Red Cross Hospital and Atomic-Bomb Survivors Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Yoshinobu Kanda
- Division of Hematology, Jichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Kentaro Fukushima
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Osaka University Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Ken-Ichi Matsuoka
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - Satoru Takada
- Leukemia Research Center, Saiseikai Maebashi Hospital, Maebashi, Japan
| | - Masashi Sawa
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Anjo Kosei Hospital, Anjo, Japan
| | - Takashi Ashida
- Division of Hematology and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kindai University Hospital, Osakasayama, Japan
| | - Makoto Onizuka
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan
| | - Tatsuo Ichinohe
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Research Institute for Radiation Biology and Medicine, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Yoshiko Atsuta
- Japanese Data Center for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, Nagoya, Japan; Department of Registry Science for Transplant and Cellular Therapy, Aichi Medical University School of Medicine, Nagakute, Japan
| | - Junya Kanda
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Masamitsu Yanada
- Department of Hematology and Cell Therapy, Aichi Cancer Center, Nagoya, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation from Alternative Donors in Acute Myelogenous Leukemia: A Comparative Analysis. Transplant Cell Ther 2021; 27:1005.e1-1005.e8. [PMID: 34500125 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2021.08.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2021] [Revised: 08/29/2021] [Accepted: 08/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
In the absence of HLA-matched related and unrelated donors, alternative donors must be found for patients in need of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). There are at least 3 donor options: a mismatched unrelated donor (MMUD), umbilical cord blood (UCB), and a haploidentical related donor (haplo); however, the optimal alternative donor type remains to be established. This study aimed to address how the outcomes of patients receiving these 3 alternative donor HCTs differ, and whether these outcomes change over time post-transplantation. We retrospectively analyzed Japanese nationwide transplantation registry data of adults with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) undergoing allogeneic HCT while in first complete remission (CR) from an MMUD with a 7/8 match at the allele level (n = 601), with UCB (n = 1110), or from a haploidentical related donor (n = 221) between 2007 and 2018. For patients who underwent transplantation between 2007 and 2014, the 3-year overall survival (OS) for the MMUD, UCB, and Haplo groups was 60%, 54%, and 47%, respectively (P = .022). For those who underwent transplantation between 2015 and 2018, the 3-year OS in these groups was 60%, 66%, and 63%, respectively (P = .693). Multivariate analysis revealed that the risks of both overall mortality and nonrelapse mortality (NRM) were significantly lower in the later period than in the earlier period in the UCB group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.66 [P < .001] for OS; HR, 0.64 [P < .001] for NRM) and the Haplo group (HR, 0.58 [P = .019 for OS; HR, 0.39 [P = .004] for NRM), but not in the MMUD group (HR, 1.07 [P = .631] for OS; HR, 1.26 [P = .175] for NRM). The results of a test for interaction showed a significant difference in the effect of transplantation period on OS and NRM between the MMUD and UCB groups (P = .014 for OS; P = .004 for NRM) and between the MMUD and Haplo groups (P = .034 for OS; P = .003 for NRM). These findings demonstrate the recent improvements in the outcomes of UCB and Haplo transplantations in patients with AML in first CR that have resulted in a similar OS in patients undergoing HCT with grafts from MMUDs, UCB, and haploidentical donors in the later period of the study.
Collapse
|
3
|
Lin YC, Luo CJ, Miao Y, Wang JM, Luo CY, Qin X, Cai JY, Li BS, Chen J. Human leukocyte antigen disparities reduce relapse after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in children with juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia: A single-center retrospective study from China. Pediatr Transplant 2021; 25:e13825. [PMID: 33131184 DOI: 10.1111/petr.13825] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2019] [Revised: 07/10/2020] [Accepted: 07/26/2020] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND HSCT is the only proven curative therapy for JMML. Matching donor and recipient HLA alleles is considered optimal to reduce the risk of GVHD after HSCT but is not always possible. Only a limited number of studies have compared the influence of HLA disparities on HSCT outcomes for patients with JMML. METHODS We conducted a retrospective study among 47 children with JMML who received related or unrelated unmanipulated HSCT (March 2010-October 2018). Among our participants, 27 (57.4%) donor-recipient pairs had 0-1 HLA disparities (Group 1: HLA-matched or ≤1 allele/antigen mismatch donor) and 20 (42.6%) had ≥2 HLA disparities (Group 2: 2-3 mismatched/haploidentical donors). RESULTS The median follow-up period was 26.0 months (range: 1-105 months), and the 5-year probabilities of DFS and RI for the whole cohort were 54.6 ± 7.7% and 34.8 ± 15.0%, respectively. Compared to Group 1, Group 2 patients had a significantly lower RI (5.3 ± 10.5% vs 55.5 ± 20.9%, P ˂ .001), though similar rates of grade II-IV acute GVHD (60.0 ± 22.4% vs 33.3 ± 18.2%, P = .08), grade III-IV acute GVHD (25.0 ± 19.5% vs 7.4 ± 10.1%, P = .08), chronic GVHD (30.0 ± 20.9% vs 34.9 ± 18.8%, P = .85), NRM (20.0 ± 18.0% vs 3.9 ± 7.7%, P = .07), and DFS (74.4 ± 9.9% vs 41.3 ± 10.0%, P = .08). CONCLUSIONS Disease relapse remains the major cause of treatment failure in JMML patients, especially in patients receiving HLA-matched and limited HLA-mismatched HSCT. Our findings suggest that donor-recipient HLA disparities may improve the outcome of HSCT in children with JMML.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu-Chen Lin
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Key Lab of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology of China Ministry of Health, Shanghai, China
| | - Cheng-Juan Luo
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Key Lab of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology of China Ministry of Health, Shanghai, China
| | - Yan Miao
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Key Lab of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology of China Ministry of Health, Shanghai, China
| | - Jian-Min Wang
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Key Lab of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology of China Ministry of Health, Shanghai, China
| | - Chang-Ying Luo
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Key Lab of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology of China Ministry of Health, Shanghai, China
| | - Xia Qin
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Key Lab of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology of China Ministry of Health, Shanghai, China
| | - Jiao-Yang Cai
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Key Lab of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology of China Ministry of Health, Shanghai, China
| | - Ben-Shang Li
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Key Lab of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology of China Ministry of Health, Shanghai, China
| | - Jing Chen
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Key Lab of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology of China Ministry of Health, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|