Reduction of the unnecessary dose from the over-range area with a spiral dynamic z-collimator: comparison of beam pitch and detector coverage with 128-detector row CT

Overranging and overbeaming measurement in area detector computed tomography: A method for simultaneous measurement in volume helical acquisition

Purpose

We propose a novel method to assess overbeaming and overranging, as well as the effect of reducing longitudinal exposure range, by using a dynamic z‐collimator in area detector computed tomography.

Methods and materials

A 500‐mm diameter cylindrical imaging plate was exposed by helical scanning in a dark room. The beam collimation of the helical acquisitions was set at 32 and 80 mm. Overbeaming and overranging with the dynamic z‐collimator were measured.

Results

The actual beam widths were approximately 39 and 88 mm at 32 and 80 mm collimation, respectively, and were relatively reduced owing to increased beam collimation. Overranging was 27.0 and 48.2 mm with a pitch of 0.83 and 1.49 at 32 mm collimation and 72.5 and 83.1 mm with a pitch of 0.87 and 0.99 at 80 mm collimation. The dynamic z‐collimator relatively reduced the overranging by 17.3% and 17.1% for the 32 and 80 mm collimation, respectively.

Conclusion

We devised a method to simultaneously measure overbeaming and overranging with only one helical acquisition. Although the dynamic z‐collimator reduced the overranging by approximately 17%, wider collimation widths and higher pitch settings would increase the exposure dose outside the scan range.

Efficacy of a dynamic collimator for overranging dose reduction in a second- and third-generation dual source CT scanner

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of the renewed dynamic collimator in a third-generation dual source CT (DSCT) scanner and to determine the improvements over the second-generation scanner.

Methods

Collimator efficacy is defined as the percentage overranging dose in terms of dose–length product (DLP) that is blocked by the dynamic collimator relative to the total overranging dose in case of a static collimator. Efficacy was assessed at various pitch values and different scan lengths. The number of additional rotations due to overranging and effective scan length were calculated on the basis of reported scanning parameters. On the basis of these values, the efficacy of the collimator was calculated.

Results

The second-generation scanner showed decreased performance of the dynamic collimator at increasing pitch. Efficacy dropped to 10% at the highest pitch. For the third-generation scanner the efficacy remained above 50% at higher pitch. Noise was for some pitch values slightly higher at the edge of the imaged volume, indicating a reduced scan range to reduce the overranging dose.

Conclusions

The improved dynamic collimator in the third-generation scanner blocks the overranging dose for more than 50% and is more capable of shielding radiation dose, especially in high pitch scan modes.

Key points

• Overranging dose is to a large extent blocked by the dynamic collimator

• Efficacy is strongly improved within the third-generation DSCT scanner

• Reducing the number of additional rotations can reduce overranging with increased noise

DEVELOPMENT OF AGE-SPECIFIC JAPANESE PHYSICAL PHANTOMS FOR DOSE EVALUATION IN INFANT CT EXAMINATIONS

Secondary to the previous development of age-specific Japanese head phantoms, the authors designed Japanese torso phantoms for dose assessment in infant computed tomography (CT) examinations and completed a Japanese 3-y-old head-torso phantom. For design of age-specific torso phantoms (0, 0.5, 1 and 3 y old), anatomical structures were measured from CT images of Japanese infant patients. From the CT morphometry, it was found that rib cages of Japanese infants were smaller than those in Europeans and Americans. Radiophotoluminescence glass dosemeters were used for dose measurement of a 3-y-old head-torso phantom. To examine the validity of the developed phantom, organ and effective doses by the in-phantom dosimetry system were compared with simulation values in a web-based CT dose calculation system (WAZA-ARI). The differences in doses between the two systems were <20 % at the doses of organs within scan regions and effective doses in head, chest and abdominopelvic CT examinations.

Reducing Patient Radiation Exposure From CT Fluoroscopy-Guided Lumbar Spine Pain Injections by Targeting the Planning CT

OBJECTIVE

CT fluoroscopy-guided lumbar spine pain injections typically include a preprocedural planning CT that contributes considerably to patient dose. The purpose of this study was to quantify the degree of radiation exposure reduction achieved by modifying only the planning CT component of the examination.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of 80 CT fluoroscopy-guided lumbar spine injections. Forty patients were scanned with a standard protocol using automatic tube current modulation (method A). Another 40 patients were scanned using a new technique that fixed the tube current of the planning CT to either 50 or 100 mA on the basis of the patient's anteroposterior diameter and that reduced the z-axis coverage (method B). Dose-length products (DLPs) were compared for the two methods.

RESULTS

The mean maximal tube current for the planning CT was 435.0 mA for method A and 67.5 mA for method B. The mean z-axis was shorter for method B at 6.5 cm than for method A at 9.6 cm (p < 0.0001). The mean DLP for the planning CT was 11 times lower for method B than for method A: 27.9 versus 313.1 mGy × cm, respectively (p < 0.0001). When method B was used, the mean DLP for the total procedure (i.e., planning CT plus CT fluoroscopy components) was reduced by 78%. There was no significant difference between methods A and B in CT fluoroscopy time (p = 0.37). All procedures were technically successful.

CONCLUSION

A nearly fivefold reduction in radiation exposure can be achieved in CT fluoroscopy-guided lumbar spine pain injections through modifications to the planning CT alone.

CT scan parameters and radiation dose: practical advice for radiologists

Although there has been increasing recognition of the importance of reducing radiation dose when performing multidetector CT examinations, the increasing complexity of CT scanner technology, as well as confusion about the importance of many different CT scan parameters, has served as an impediment to radiologists seeking to create lower dose protocols. The authors seek to guide radiologists through the manipulation of 8 fundamental CT scan parameters that can be altered or optimized to reduce patient radiation dose, including detector configuration, tube current, tube potential, reconstruction algorithm, patient positioning, scan range, reconstructed slice thickness, and pitch. Although there is always an inherent trade-off between image quality or noise and patient radiation dose, in many cases, a reasoned manipulation of these 8 parameters can allow the safer imaging of patients (with lower dose) while preserving diagnostic image quality.