Susceptibility to Colorectal Cancer and Two Genetic Polymorphisms of XRCC4

Current status and prospect of the DNA double-strand break repair pathway in colorectal cancer development and treatment

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common malignancies worldwide. Double-strand break (DSB) is the most severe type of DNA damage. However, few reviews have thoroughly examined the involvement of DSB in CRC. Latest researches demonstrated that DSB repair plays an important role in CRC. For example, DSB-related genes such as BRCA1, Ku-70 and DNA polymerase theta (POLQ) are associated with the occurrence of CRC, and POLQ even showed to affect the prognosis and resistance for radiotherapy in CRC. This review comprehensively summarizes the DSB role in CRC, explores the mechanisms and discusses the association with CRC treatment. Four pathways for DSB have been demonstrated. 1. Nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) is the major pathway. Its core genes including Ku70 and Ku80 bind to broken ends and recruit repair factors to form a complex that mediates the connection of DNA breaks. 2. Homologous recombination (HR) is another important pathway. Its key genes including BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in finding, pairing, and joining broken ends, and ensure the restoration of breaks in a normal double-stranded DNA structure. 3. Single-strand annealing (SSA) pathway, and 4. POLθ-mediated end-joining (alt-EJ) is a backup pathway. This paper elucidates roles of the DSB repair pathways in CRC, which could contribute to the development of potential new treatment approaches and provide new opportunities for CRC treatment and more individualized treatment options based on therapeutic strategies targeting these DNA repair pathways.

Genetic and epigenetic alterations in DNA repair genes and treatment outcome of chemoradiotherapy in cervical cancer

Cervical cancer (CaCx) is the deadliest malignancy among women which is caused by human papillomavirus (HPV) and anthro-demographical/clinicopathological factors. HPV oncoproteins E6 and E7 target p53 and RB (retinoblastoma) protein degradation, Ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM), ATM-RAD3-related (ATR) inactivation and subsequent impairment of non-homologous end joining (NHEJ), homologous recombination, and base excision repair pathways. There is also an accumulation of genetic and epigenetic alterations in Tumor Growth Suppressors (TGS), oncogenes, and DNA repair genes leading to increased genome instability and CaCx development. These alterations might be responsible for differential clinical response to Cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in patients. This review explores HPV-mediated DNA damage as a risk factor in CaCx development, the mechanistic role of genetic and epigenetic alterations in DNA repair genes and their association with CRT and outcome, It also explores new possibilities for the development of genetic and epigenetic-based biomarkers for diagnostic, prognostic, and molecular therapeutic interventions.

Effects of Family History on Relative and Absolute Risks for Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Guidelines recommend that individuals with familial colorectal cancer undergo colonoscopy surveillance instead of average-risk screening. However, these recommendations vary widely. To substantiate appropriate surveillance strategies, precise and valid evidence-based risk estimates are needed for individuals with a family history of colorectal cancer (CRC).

METHODS

We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane from inception to July 2018 for case-control and cohort studies investigating the effect of family history on CRC risk. We calculated summary estimates of pooled relative risks (RRs) using a random-effects model. Life tables were created to convert RR estimates into absolute risk estimates.

RESULTS

We screened 4417 articles and identified 42 eligible case-control and 20 cohort studies. In case-control studies, the RR for CRC in patients with 1 first-degree relative (FDR with CRC) was 1.92 (95% CI, 1.53-2.41) and 1.37 (95% CI, 0.76-2.46) for cohort studies. For individuals with 2 or more FDRs with CRC, the RR was 2.81 in case-control studies (95% CI, 1.73-4.55) and 2.40 in cohort studies (95% CI, 1.76-3.28). For individuals having a FDR diagnosed with CRC at an age younger than 50 years, the RR for CRC in their FDRs was 3.57 in case-control studies (95% CI, 1.07-11.85) and 3.26 in cohort studies (95% CI, 2.82-3.77). The cumulative absolute risks for CRC at 85 years in Western Europe were 4.8% for persons with 1 FDR with CRC (95% CI, 2.7%-8.3%), 8.2% for individuals with 2 or more FDRs (95% CI, 6.1%-10.9%), and 11% for persons with a FDR diagnosed with CRC at an age younger than 50 years (95% CI, 9.5%-12.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we found that the RR of CRC among FDRs is lower than previously expected, especially based on cohort studies. Risk estimates are affected by the number of relatives with CRC and their age at diagnosis. Intensified colonoscopy surveillance strategies could be considered for high-risk groups. PROSPERO trial identification no: CRD42018103058.

Quantitative risk of positive family history in developing colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Positive family history is a risk factor for development of colorectal cancer. Despite numerous studies on the topic, the absolute risk in patients with a positive family history remains unclear and therefore studies are lacking to validate non-invasive screening methods in individuals with positive family history.

AIM

To quantify the risk of colorectal cancer in individuals with a positive family history.

METHODS

A comprehensive electronic literature search was performed using PubMed from January 1955 until November 2017, EMBASE from 1947 until 2018, and Cochrane Library without date restrictions. Two independent reviewers conducted study selection, data extraction and quality assessment. A meta-analysis of Mantel-Haenzel relative risks was performed using the random effects model. Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to score the quality of selected papers. Funnel plot and Egger’s regression test was performed to detect publication bias. Subgroup analysis was performed comparing Asian and non-Asian studies. Sensitivity analyses were performed to rule out the effect of the timing of the study, overall quality, the main outcome and the effect of each individual study in overall result.

RESULTS

Forty-six out of 3390 studies, including 906981 patients were included in the final analysis. 41 of the included studies were case-control and 5 were cohort. A positive family history of colorectal cancer in first-degree relatives was associated with significantly increased risk of colorectal cancer with a relative risk of 1.87 (95%CI: 1.68-2.09; P < 0.00001). Cochrane Q test was significant (P < 0.00001, I² = 90%). Egger’s regression test showed asymmetry in the funnel plot and therefore the Trim and Fill method was used which confirmed the validity of the results. There was no difference between Asian versus non-Asian studies. Results remained robust in sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSION

Individuals with a positive family history of colorectal cancer are 1.87 times more likely to develop colorectal cancer. Screening guidelines should pay specific attention to individuals with positive family history and further studies need to be done on validating current screening methods or developing new modalities in this high-risk population.

XRCC4 c.1394G>T Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms and Breast Cancer Risk among Filipinos

Background:

The identification of cancer-associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) and mutation genes is a promising approach in recognizing individuals who are at risk of developing cancer. Hence, this study was conducted to determine the association between XRCC4 c.1394G>T SNP and breast cancer development among Filipinos.

Methods:

Genotyping for XRCC4 c.1394G>T SNP was performed on breast cancer patients (n=103) and their age- and sex- matched clinically healthy controls (n=103) by polymerase chain reaction – restriction fragment length polymorphism.

Results:

Significant difference in genotype (p=0.007) and allele (p=0.003) frequencies in XRCC4 c.1394G>T was observed between the breast cancer cases and controls. Carriers of the XRCC4 c.1394 G>T genotype were observed to have significantly higher risk of developing breast cancer compared to individuals with T/T genotype (OR=2.67, 95% CI: 1.36 – 5.25). XRCC4 c.1394G>T combined with passive smoking may also significantly increase risk of breast cancer (OR=14.73; 95% CI= 9.88-18.86).

Conclusion:

XRCC4 c. 1394G>T may be associated with breast cancer development among Filipinos.

Genetic Polymorphisms of DNA Repair Pathways in Sporadic Colorectal Carcinogenesis

DNA repair systems play a critical role in maintaining the integrity and stability of the genome, which mainly include base excision repair (BER), nucleotide excision repair (NER), mismatch repair (MMR) and double-strand break repair (DSBR). The polymorphisms in different DNA repair genes that are mainly represented by single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) can potentially modulate the individual DNA repair capacity and therefore exert an impact on individual genetic susceptibility to cancer. Sporadic colorectal cancer arises from the colorectum without known contribution from germline causes or significant family history of cancer or inflammatory bowel disease. In recent years, emerging studies have investigated the association between polymorphisms of DNA repair system genes and sporadic CRC. Here, we review recent insights into the polymorphisms of DNA repair pathway genes, not only individual gene polymorphism but also gene-gene and gene-environment interactions, in sporadic colorectal carcinogenesis.

Lower Relative Contribution of Positive Family History to Colorectal Cancer Risk with Increasing Age: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 9.28 Million Individuals

OBJECTIVES

Existing algorithms predicting the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) assign a fixed score for family history of CRC. Whether the increased CRC risk attributed to family history of CRC was higher in younger patients remains inconclusive. We examined the risk of CRC associated with family history of CRC in first-degree relative (FDR) according to the age of index subjects (<40 vs. ≥40; <50 vs. ≥50; and <60 vs. ≥60 years).

METHODS

Ovid Medline, EMBASE, and gray literature from the reference lists of all identified studies were searched from their inception to March 2017. We included case-control/cohort studies that investigated the relationship between family history of CRC in FDR and prevalence of CRC. Two reviewers independently selected articles according to the PRISMA guideline. A random effects meta-analysis pooled relative risks (RR).

RESULTS

We analyzed 9.28 million subjects from 63 studies. A family history of CRC in FDR confers a higher risk of CRC (RR = 1.76, 95% CI = 1.57-1.97, p < 0.001). This increased risk was higher in younger individuals (RR = 3.29, 95% CI = 1.67-6.49 for <40 years versus RR = 1.42, 95% CI = 1.24-1.62 for ≥40 years, p = 0.017; RR = 2.81, 95% CI = 1.94-4.07 for <50 years versus RR = 1.47, 95% CI = 1.28-1.69 for ≥50 years, p = 0.001). No publication bias was identified, and the findings are robust in subgroup analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

The increase in relative risk of CRC attributed to family history was found to be higher in younger individuals. Family history of CRC could be assigned a higher score for younger subjects in CRC risk prediction algorithms. Future studies should examine if such approach may improve their predictive capability.