Aggressive Surgical Approach for Treatment of Primary and Recurrent Retroperitoneal Soft Tissue Sarcoma

3D-SARC: A Pilot Study Testing the Use of a 3D Augmented-Reality Model with Conventional Imaging as a Preoperative Assessment Tool for Surgical Resection of Retroperitoneal Sarcoma

BACKGROUND

Retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPSs) present a surgical challenge, with complex anatomic relationships to organs and vascular structures. This pilot study investigated the role of three-dimensional (3D) augmented reality (3DAR) compared with standard imaging in preoperative planning and resection strategies.

METHODS

For the study, 13 patients who underwent surgical resection of their RPS were selected based on the location of their tumor (right, left, pelvis). From the patients' preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans, 3DAR models were created using a D2P program and projected by an augmented-reality (AR) glass (Hololens). The 3DAR models were evaluated by three experienced sarcoma surgeons and compared with the baseline two-dimensional (2D) contrast-enhanced CT scans.

RESULTS

Three members of the surgical team evaluated 13 models of retroperitoneal sarcomas, resulting in a total of 26 responses. When the surgical team was asked to evaluate whether the 3DAR better prepared the surgeon for planned surgical resection, 10 responses favored the 3DAR, 5 favored the 2D CT scans and 11 showed no difference (p = 0.074). According to 15 (57.6 %) of the 26 responses, the 3DAR offered additional value over standard imaging in the preoperative planning (median score of 4; range, 1-5). The median stated likelihood that the surgeons would consult the 3DAR was 5 (range, 2-5) for the preoperative setting and 3 (range, 1-5) for the intraoperative setting.

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot study suggests that the use of 3DAR may provide additional value over current standard imaging in the preoperative planning for surgical resection of RPS, and the technology merits further study.

Clinical features and surgical strategy of retroperitoneal liposarcoma involving the kidney capsule: a retrospective comparative cohort study

BACKGROUND

Valid and generalizable data on the clinical features and surgical strategies for retroperitoneal liposarcoma (LPS) involving the kidney capsule remain scarce. This study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics, morbidity, mortality, and long-term survival of patients with retroperitoneal LPS involving the kidney capsule.

METHODS

The authors analyzed a prospectively maintained database of patients who underwent surgical resection for retroperitoneal LPS between 2015 and 2020. The patients were categorized into kidney capsule or no kidney capsule groups based on the presence or absence of kidney capsule involvement. A kidney-sparing strategy for retroperitoneal LPS involving the kidney capsule was developed. The primary outcome measure was overall survival (OS). The cumulative event probability curve was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier, and differences between groups using the Log-Rank.

RESULTS

The study population consisted of 128 patients-54 with and 74 without kidney capsule involvement. Of these patients, 70 were female (54.7%) and 58 were male (45.3%), with a median age of 55. The median follow-up duration was 35 months. Postoperative morbidity, mortality, length of hospital stay, length of ICU stay, OS, and recurrence-free survival (RFS) did not differ significantly between the groups. Eleven patients developed postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI), and one patient required dialysis during the follow-up period. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, only nephrectomy was independently associated with postoperative AKI. Subgroup analysis of patients with kidney capsule involvement showed that nephrectomy did not improve OS or RFS but significantly decreased postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate.

CONCLUSION

Nephrectomy was associated with an increased risk of postoperative AKI after retroperitoneal LPS resection. A kidney-sparing strategy for retroperitoneal LPS involving the kidney capsule achieved optimal clinical outcomes.

Aggressive surgical approach with vascular resection and reconstruction for retroperitoneal sarcomas: a systematic review

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Surgery is the mainstay of treatment and completeness of surgical resection is critical to achieve local control for retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS). En-bloc resection of adjacent organs, including major abdominal vessels, is often required to achieve negative margins. The aim of this review was to summarise the available evidence to assess the relative benefits and disadvantages of an aggressive surgical approach with vascular resection in patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS).

METHODS

We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and EMBASE for relevant studies published from inception up to August 1, 2022. We performed a systematic review of the available studies to assess the safety and long-term survival results of vascular resection for RPS.

RESULTS

We identified a total of 23 studies for our review. Overall postoperative in-hospital or 30-day mortality rate of patients with primary iliocaval leiomyosarcoma was 3% (11/359), and the major complication rate was 13%. The recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates after the follow-up period varied between 15% and 52%, and the 5-year overall survival (OS) rates ranged from 25 to 78%. Overall postoperative in-hospital or 30-day mortality rate of patients with RPSs receiving vascular resection was 3%, and the major complication rate was 27%. The RFS rates after the follow-up period were 18-86%, and the 5-year OS rates varied between 50% and 73%. There were no significant differences in the rates of RFS (HR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.74-1.19; p = 0.945) and OS (HR: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.66-1.36; p = 0.774) between the extended resection group and tumour resection alone group.

CONCLUSIONS

With adequate preparation and proper management, for patients with RPSs involving major vessels, aggressive surgical approach with vascular resection can achieve R0/R1 resection and improve survival.

Analysis of potential risk factors in the survival of patients with primary retroperitoneal liposarcoma

INTRODUCTION

The present work is an observational study of a series of variables regarding overall survival and disease-free survival in patients diagnosed with primary liposarcoma.

METHODS

The study is prospective with retrolective data collection that includes all patients with primary liposarcoma referred to Hospital Son Espases University Hospital, Palma de Mallorca, Spain from January 1990 to December 2019.

RESULTS

The study includes 50 patients and the compartment surgery was performed in 18 patients (36%) of cases. The mean overall survival of the sample was 15.57 years (95% CI: 12.02-19.12) and the mean disease-free survival was 6.70 years (95% CI: 4.50-8.86).

CONCLUSION

Compartment surgery has not shown benefits in terms of overall survival and disease-free survival. The ASA classification (≥3) predicts a poor prognosis in both overall survival and disease-free survival. Resection with free margins, described on the pathological results and defined in this work as R0, show better disease-free survival.

Retroperitoneal Sarcomas: a Current Review on Management

Retroperitoneal sarcomas are heterogeneous tumours with variable disease biology and outcomes. The prognosis is primarily related to tumour histology and grade as well as the ability to achieve margin negative resection. Surgery involves compartment or contiguous organ resection to achieve the above goal. Careful utilization of neoadjuvant and adjuvant strategies like radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy can lead to improvement in margin status, thereby contributing to better local control and possibly reducing systemic dissemination. Use of targeted therapies has paved newer pathways of treatment integration centred on molecular and genetic targets. The aim of this review is to update the reader on all aspects of retroperitoneal sarcoma management including emphasis on pertinent and landmark trials in this regard.

Survival outcomes of surgery for retroperitoneal sarcomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Definitive evidence to guide clinical practice on the principles of surgery for retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPSs) is still lacking. This study aims to summarise the available evidence to assess the relative benefits and disadvantages of an aggressive surgical approach with contiguous organ resection in patients with RPS, the association between surgical resection margins and survival outcomes, and the role of surgery in recurrent RPS.

Methods

We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and EMBASE for relevant randomised trials and observational studies published from inception up to May 1, 2021. Prospective or retrospective studies, published in the English language, providing outcome data with surgical treatment in patients with RPS were selected. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS).

Findings

In total, 47 articles were analysed. There were no significant differences in the rates of OS (HR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.83–1.03; P = 0.574) and recurrence-free survival (HR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.74–1.27; P = 0.945) between the extended resection group and the tumour resection alone group. Organ resection did not increase postoperative mortality (OR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.55–1.81; P = 0.997) but had a relatively higher complication rate (OR: 2.24, 95% CI: 0.94–5.34; P = 0.068). OS was higher in R0 than in R1 resection (HR: 1.34; 95% CI: 1.23–1.44; P < 0.001) and in R1 resection than in R2 resection (HR: 1.86; 95% CI: 1.35–2.36; P < 0.001). OS was also higher in R2 resection than in no surgery (HR: 1.26; 95% CI: 1.07–1.45; P < 0.001), however, subgroup analysis showed that the pooled HR in the trials reporting primary RPS was similar between the two groups (HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.87–1.42; P = 0.42). Surgical treatment achieves a significantly higher OS rate than does conservative treatment (HR: 2.42; 95% CI: 1.21–3.64; P < 0.001) for recurrent RPS.

Conclusions

For primary RPS, curative-intent en bloc resection should be aimed, and adjacent organs with evidence of direct invasion must be resected to avoid R2 resection. For recurrent RPS, surgical resection should be considered as a priority. Incomplete resection remains to have a survival benefit in select patients with unresectable recurrent RPS.

Analysis of potential risk factors in the survival of patients with primary retroperitoneal liposarcoma

INTRODUCTION

The present work is an observational study of a series of variables regarding overall survival and disease-free survival in patients diagnosed with primary liposarcoma.

METHODS

The study is prospective with retrolective data collection that includes all patients with primary liposarcoma referred to Hospital Son Espases University Hospital, Palma de Mallorca, Spain from January 1990 to December 2019.

RESULTS

The study includes 50 patients and the compartment surgery was performed in 18 patients (36%) of cases. The mean overall survival of the sample was 15.57 years (95% CI: 12.02-19.12) and the mean disease-free survival was 6.70 years (95% CI: 4.50-8.86).

CONCLUSION

Compartment surgery has not shown benefits in terms of overall survival and disease-free survival. The ASA classification (≥3) predicts a poor prognosis in both overall survival and disease-free survival. Resection with free margins, described on the pathological results and defined in this work as R0, show better disease-free survival.