1
|
Adam N, Wieder R. Predictive Modeling of Long-Term Survivors with Stage IV Breast Cancer Using the SEER-Medicare Dataset. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:4033. [PMID: 39682219 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16234033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2024] [Revised: 11/25/2024] [Accepted: 11/27/2024] [Indexed: 12/18/2024] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Treatment of women with stage IV breast cancer (BC) extends population-averaged survival by only a few months. Here, we develop a model for identifying individual circumstances where appropriate therapy will extend survival while minimizing adverse events. OBJECTIVE Our goal is to develop high-confidence deep learning (DL) models to predict survival in individual stage IV breast cancer patients based on their unique circumstances generated by patient, cancer, treatment, and adverse event variables. We previously showed that predictive DL survival modeling of potentially curable stage I-III patients can be improved by combining time-fixed and time-varying covariates. Here, we demonstrate that DL-based predictive survival modeling in stage IV patients, where treatment does not offer a cure, can generate accurate individual survival predictions by considering subsequent lines of potential treatment to guide therapy. This guidance is rarely obtainable in the nearly limitless scenarios of metastatic disease. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS We applied the SEER-Medicare linked dataset from 1991 to 2016 to investigate 14,312 unique stage IV patients with 1,880,153 entries. We used DeepSurv- and DeepHit-, Nnet-survival- and Cox-Time DL-based predictive models to consider the combination of time-fixed and time-varying covariates at each visit for each patient. We adopted random sampling to divide the input dataset into training, validation, and testing sets. We verified the models' implementation using the pycox package and fine-tuned the models using the open-source library Amazon SageMaker Python SDK 2.232.2 (software development kit). Our results demonstrated the proof of principle of the models by generating individual patients' survival curves. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE By extending the survival prediction models to consider stage IV BC patients' time-fixed and time-varying covariates, we achieved a prediction error below 10%. Based on their circumstance-specific situations, these models can predict survival in individual stage IV patients with high confidence. The models will serve as an important adjunct to treatment decisions in patients with stage IV BC and test what-if scenarios of treatment or no treatment options to optimize therapy for extending patient lives and minimizing adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nabil Adam
- Phalcon, LLC, Manhasset, NY 11030, USA
- Newark Campus, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ 07102, USA
| | - Robert Wieder
- Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ 07103, USA
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Newark, NJ 07103, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Deipolyi AR, Ward RC, Riaz A, Vogl TJ, Simmons RM, Pieper CC, Bryce Y. Locoregional Therapies for Primary and Metastatic Breast Cancer: AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2024; 222:e2329454. [PMID: 37377360 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.23.29454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/29/2023]
Abstract
Minimally invasive locoregional therapies have a growing role in the multidisciplinary treatment of primary and metastatic breast cancer. Factors contributing to the expanding role of ablation for primary breast cancer include earlier diagnosis, when tumors are small, and increased longevity of patients whose condition precludes surgery. Cryoablation has emerged as the leading ablative modality for primary breast cancer owing to its wide availability, the lack of need for sedation, and the ability to monitor the ablation zone. Emerging evidence suggests that in patients with oligometastatic breast cancer, use of locoregional therapies to eradicate all disease sites may confer a survival advantage. Evidence also suggests that transarterial therapies-including chemoembolization, chemoperfusion, and radioembolization-may be helpful to some patients with advanced liver metastases from breast cancer, such as those with hepatic oligoprogression or those who cannot tolerate systemic therapy. However, the optimal modalities for treatment of oligometastatic and advanced metastatic disease remain unknown. Finally, locoregional therapies may produce tumor antigens that in combination with immunotherapy drive anti-tumor immunity. Although key trials are ongoing, additional prospective studies are needed to establish the inclusion of interventional oncology in societal breast cancer guidelines to support further clinical adoption and improved patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy R Deipolyi
- Department of Surgery, Interventional Radiology, West Virginia University/Charleston Area Medical Center, 3200 MacCorkle Ave SE, Charleston, WV 25304
| | - Robert C Ward
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI
| | - Ahsun Riaz
- Department of Radiology, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Thomas J Vogl
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Rache M Simmons
- Department of Surgery, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY
| | - Claus C Pieper
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Yolanda Bryce
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhao Q, Yang F, Wu HL, Mo M, Ling YX, Liu GY. Contralateral axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer: An oligometastatic-like disease. Breast 2023; 72:103589. [PMID: 37839139 PMCID: PMC10582740 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2023.103589] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2023] [Revised: 09/20/2023] [Accepted: 10/06/2023] [Indexed: 10/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Contralateral axillary lymph node metastasis (CAM) is rare. It remains controversial whether CAM should be regarded as a regional or distant metastatic disease. Our study aims to investigate the accurate clinical orientation and management of CAM. METHODS Two hundred and ninety-nine female patients diagnosed with breast cancer from 2000 to 2014 and confirmed to develop CAM, oligometastasis (OM) or locoregional recurrence (LRR) at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (FUSCC) were included in this study. Baseline information and survival outcomes were analyzed and compared among the three groups. RESULTS Patients with CAM exhibited similar overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) to those with OM, but worse than those with LRR (HR: 0.47 [95 % CI: 0.27-0.85], p = 0.0097; HR:0.39 [95 % CI: 0.24-0.63], p < 0.0001, respectively). Considering the patients presented with CAM or OM as a whole, we found that local treatment combined with systemic treatment did not provide a superior survival benefit over systemic treatment alone. CONCLUSION CAM was similar to an oligometastatic-like disease, and patients with these diseases may benefit from systemic treatment. Adding local treatment failed to significantly improve OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qian Zhao
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, People's Republic of China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Fan Yang
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, People's Republic of China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Huai-Liang Wu
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, People's Republic of China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Miao Mo
- Clinical Statistics Center, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Yun-Xiao Ling
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, People's Republic of China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Guang-Yu Liu
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, People's Republic of China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rodríguez Pérez A, Felip Font E, Chicas-Sett R, Montero-Luis Á, de Paz Arias L, González-Del-Alba A, López-Campos F, López López C, Hernando Requejo O, Conde-Moreno AJ, Arranz Arija JÁ, de Castro Carpeño J. Unravelling oligometastatic disease from the perspective of radiation and medical oncology. Part I: non-small cell lung cancer and breast cancer. Clin Transl Oncol 2023; 25:882-896. [PMID: 36525231 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-022-03011-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2022] [Accepted: 11/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Oligometastatic disease (OMD) defines a cancer status that is intermediate between localized and widely spread metastatic disease, and can be treated with curative intent. While diagnostic imaging tools have considerably improved in recent years, unidentified micrometastases can still evade current detection techniques, allowing the disease to progress. The various OMD scenarios are mainly defined by the number of metastases, the biological and molecular tumour profiles, and the timing of the development of metastases. Increasing knowledge has contributed to the earlier and improved detection of OMD, underlining the importance of early disease control. In view of increasing OMD detection rates in current real-world clinical practice and the lack of standardized evidence-based guidelines to treat this cancer status, a board of experts from the Spanish Societies of Radiation Oncology (SEOR) and Medical Oncology (SEOM) organized a series of sessions to update the current state-of-the-art on OMD from a multidisciplinary perspective, and to discuss how results from clinical studies might translate into promising treatment options. This expert review series summarizes what is known and what it is pending clarification in the context of OMD in the scenarios of non-small cell lung cancer and breast cancer (Part I), and prostate cancer and colorectal cancer (Part II), aiming to offer specialists a pragmatic framework to help improve patient management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aurora Rodríguez Pérez
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Ruber Internacional, C. de La Masó, 38, 28034, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Enriqueta Felip Font
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario del Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Ángel Montero-Luis
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, Madrid, Spain
| | - Laura de Paz Arias
- Medical Oncology Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Ferrol, A Coruña, Spain
| | | | | | - Carlos López López
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, IDIVAL, Santander, Spain
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Jayarathna DK, Rentería ME, Batra J, Gandhi NS. Integrative competing endogenous RNA network analyses identify novel lncRNA and genes implicated in metastatic breast cancer. Sci Rep 2023; 13:2423. [PMID: 36765262 PMCID: PMC9918521 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-29585-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2023] [Indexed: 02/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Competing endogenous RNAs (ceRNAs) have gained attention in cancer research owing to their involvement in microRNA-mediated gene regulation. Previous studies have identified ceRNA networks of individual cancers. Nevertheless, none of these studies has investigated different cancer stages. We identify stage-specific ceRNAs in breast cancer using the cancer genome atlas data. Moreover, we investigate the molecular functions and prognostic ability of ceRNAs involved in stage I-IV networks. We identified differentially expressed candidate ceRNAs using edgeR and limma R packages. A three-step analysis was used to identify statistically significant ceRNAs of each stage. Survival analysis and functional enrichment analysis were conducted to identify molecular functions and prognostic ability. We found five genes and one long non-coding RNA unique to the stage IV ceRNA network. These genes have been described in previous breast cancer studies. Genes acted as ceRNAs are enriched in cancer-associated pathways. Two, three, and three microRNAs from stages I, II, and III were prognostic from the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Our results reveal a set of unique ceRNAs in metastatic breast cancer. Further experimental work is required to evaluate their role in metastasis. Moreover, identifying stage-specific ceRNAs will improve the understanding of personalised therapeutics in breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dulari K Jayarathna
- Centre for Genomics and Personalised Health, School of Chemistry and Physics, Queensland University of Technology, 2 George Street, Brisbane, QLD, 4000, Australia
- Department of Genetics and Computational Biology, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, 4006, Australia
| | - Miguel E Rentería
- Department of Genetics and Computational Biology, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, 4006, Australia
- School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Brisbane, QLD, 4059, Australia
| | - Jyotsna Batra
- Centre for Genomics and Personalised Health, School of Chemistry and Physics, Queensland University of Technology, 2 George Street, Brisbane, QLD, 4000, Australia
- School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Brisbane, QLD, 4059, Australia
- Translational Research Institute, 37 Kent Street, Woolloongabba, QLD, 4102, Australia
| | - Neha S Gandhi
- Centre for Genomics and Personalised Health, School of Chemistry and Physics, Queensland University of Technology, 2 George Street, Brisbane, QLD, 4000, Australia.
- Translational Research Institute, 37 Kent Street, Woolloongabba, QLD, 4102, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Takeda T, Sasaki T, Okamoto T, Kasuga A, Matsuyama M, Ozaka M, Inoue Y, Takahashi Y, Saiura A, Sasahira N. Outcomes of pancreatic cancer with liver oligometastasis. JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES 2023; 30:229-239. [PMID: 35593731 DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.1184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2022] [Revised: 03/29/2022] [Accepted: 04/05/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Liver oligometastatic pancreatic cancer (PC) may have favorable outcomes. This study aims to evaluate outcomes and factors associated with overall survival (OS) of these patients. METHODS We retrospectively investigated consecutive PC patients with liver metastasis treated at our institution between 2013 and 2020. Clinical characteristics and outcomes were compared and analyzed according to the extent of liver metastasis. Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify prognostic factors for OS. RESULTS A total of 417 patients were included (multi-organ metastasis/polymetastasis/oligometastasis 174/158/85). Oligometastasis showed a longer OS compared to other types of metastases (7.7 vs 8.2 vs 13.1 months). Age <70 years, performance status of 0, modified Glasgow prognostic score of 0, carbohydrate antigen 19-9 <1000 U/mL were identified as significant prognostic factors for OS. A prognostic index consisting of these four factors successfully stratified the prognosis of these patients (prognostic index; high vs low, 19.9 vs 8.3 months). Highly selected patients who underwent surgical resection showed a median OS of 54.6 months. CONCLUSIONS Oligometastasis presented a relatively favorable outcome. Our new prognostic index was useful in stratifying the prognosis of these patients. Multimodal treatment including surgery may have additional survival benefits for highly selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tsuyoshi Takeda
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takashi Sasaki
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takeshi Okamoto
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akiyoshi Kasuga
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masato Matsuyama
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masato Ozaka
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yosuke Inoue
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yu Takahashi
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akio Saiura
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naoki Sasahira
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Peron V, Miyasaki Piovesana M, Martins Medeiros E, André Di Ricco B, Teixeira Liutti V. Oligometastatic breast cancer to parotid gland with complete response. Breast Dis 2023; 42:67-71. [PMID: 36911926 DOI: 10.3233/bd-210049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/12/2023]
Abstract
Breast cancer metastatic to parotid gland is a very rare condition which tend to confer poor prognosis and challenging approaches. Oligometastatic breast cancer is usually defined as advanced breast cancer with less or equal than 5 metastatic lesions. We report a case of oligometastatic HER-2 breast cancer to parotid gland and lymph nodes which presented with left hemifacial swelling with erythema and enlargement of cervical and axillary lymph nodes. After 6 cycles of Docetaxel plus Trastuzumab the patient had complete response that was complemented with posterior surgical removal of primary tumor followed by radiotherapy directed to plastron, left supraclavicular and cervical drainage. The patient is still on Trastuzumab therapy and is free of disease in the last two years. We discuss the presentation and approach of a patient with metastatic breast cancer to parotid gland in the oligometastatic scenario.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Veruska Peron
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital do Câncer de Londrina, Londrina, Brazil
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Nehme R, Diab-Assaf M, Decombat C, Delort L, Caldefie-Chezet F. Targeting Adiponectin in Breast Cancer. Biomedicines 2022; 10:2958. [PMID: 36428526 PMCID: PMC9687473 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10112958] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2022] [Revised: 11/10/2022] [Accepted: 11/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Obesity and breast cancer are two major health issues that could be categorized as sincere threats to human health. In the last few decades, the relationship between obesity and cancer has been well established and extensively investigated. There is strong evidence that overweight and obesity increase the risk of postmenopausal breast cancer, and adipokines are the central players in this relationship. Produced and secreted predominantly by white adipose tissue, adiponectin is a bioactive molecule that exhibits numerous protective effects and is considered the guardian angel of adipokine. In the obesity-cancer relationship, more and more evidence shows that adiponectin may prevent and protect individuals from developing breast cancer. Recently, several updates have been published on the implication of adiponectin in regulating tumor development, progression, and metastases. In this review, we provide an updated overview of the metabolic signaling linking adiponectin and breast cancer in all its stages. On the other hand, we critically summarize all the available promising candidates that may reactivate these pathways mainly by targeting adiponectin receptors. These molecules could be synthetic small molecules or plant-based proteins. Interestingly, the advances in genomics have made it possible to create peptide sequences that could specifically replace human adiponectin, activate its receptor, and mimic its function. Thus, the obvious anti-cancer activity of adiponectin on breast cancer should be better exploited, and adiponectin must be regarded as a serious biomarker that should be targeted in order to confront this threatening disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rawan Nehme
- Université Clermont-Auvergne, INRAE, UNH Unité de Nutrition Humaine, CRNH-Auvergne, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Mona Diab-Assaf
- Equipe Tumorigénèse Moléculaire et Pharmacologie Anticancéreuse, Faculté des Sciences II, Université Libanaise Fanar, Beyrouth 1500, Lebanon
| | - Caroline Decombat
- Université Clermont-Auvergne, INRAE, UNH Unité de Nutrition Humaine, CRNH-Auvergne, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Laetitia Delort
- Université Clermont-Auvergne, INRAE, UNH Unité de Nutrition Humaine, CRNH-Auvergne, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Florence Caldefie-Chezet
- Université Clermont-Auvergne, INRAE, UNH Unité de Nutrition Humaine, CRNH-Auvergne, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Latacz E, Höppener D, Bohlok A, Leduc S, Tabariès S, Fernández Moro C, Lugassy C, Nyström H, Bozóky B, Floris G, Geyer N, Brodt P, Llado L, Van Mileghem L, De Schepper M, Majeed AW, Lazaris A, Dirix P, Zhang Q, Petrillo SK, Vankerckhove S, Joye I, Meyer Y, Gregorieff A, Roig NR, Vidal-Vanaclocha F, Denis L, Oliveira RC, Metrakos P, Grünhagen DJ, Nagtegaal ID, Mollevi DG, Jarnagin WR, D’Angelica MI, Reynolds AR, Doukas M, Desmedt C, Dirix L, Donckier V, Siegel PM, Barnhill R, Gerling M, Verhoef C, Vermeulen PB. Histopathological growth patterns of liver metastasis: updated consensus guidelines for pattern scoring, perspectives and recent mechanistic insights. Br J Cancer 2022; 127:988-1013. [PMID: 35650276 PMCID: PMC9470557 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-022-01859-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2020] [Revised: 04/19/2022] [Accepted: 05/11/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
The first consensus guidelines for scoring the histopathological growth patterns (HGPs) of liver metastases were established in 2017. Since then, numerous studies have applied these guidelines, have further substantiated the potential clinical value of the HGPs in patients with liver metastases from various tumour types and are starting to shed light on the biology of the distinct HGPs. In the present guidelines, we give an overview of these studies, discuss novel strategies for predicting the HGPs of liver metastases, such as deep-learning algorithms for whole-slide histopathology images and medical imaging, and highlight liver metastasis animal models that exhibit features of the different HGPs. Based on a pooled analysis of large cohorts of patients with liver-metastatic colorectal cancer, we propose a new cut-off to categorise patients according to the HGPs. An up-to-date standard method for HGP assessment within liver metastases is also presented with the aim of incorporating HGPs into the decision-making processes surrounding the treatment of patients with liver-metastatic cancer. Finally, we propose hypotheses on the cellular and molecular mechanisms that drive the biology of the different HGPs, opening some exciting preclinical and clinical research perspectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Latacz
- grid.5284.b0000 0001 0790 3681Translational Cancer Research Unit, GZA Hospitals, Iridium Netwerk and University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Diederik Höppener
- grid.508717.c0000 0004 0637 3764Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ali Bohlok
- grid.418119.40000 0001 0684 291XDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Sophia Leduc
- grid.5596.f0000 0001 0668 7884Laboratory for Translational Breast Cancer Research, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sébastien Tabariès
- grid.14709.3b0000 0004 1936 8649Department of Medicine, Rosalind and Morris Goodman Cancer Research Institute, McGill University, Montreal, QC Canada
| | - Carlos Fernández Moro
- grid.4714.60000 0004 1937 0626Department of Laboratory Medicine, Division of Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden ,grid.24381.3c0000 0000 9241 5705Department of Clinical Pathology and Cancer Diagnostics, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden
| | - Claire Lugassy
- grid.418596.70000 0004 0639 6384Department of Translational Research, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Hanna Nyström
- grid.12650.300000 0001 1034 3451Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Surgery, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden ,grid.12650.300000 0001 1034 3451Wallenberg Centre for Molecular Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Béla Bozóky
- grid.24381.3c0000 0000 9241 5705Department of Clinical Pathology and Cancer Diagnostics, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden
| | - Giuseppe Floris
- grid.5596.f0000 0001 0668 7884Department of Imaging and Pathology, Laboratory of Translational Cell & Tissue Research and University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium ,grid.410569.f0000 0004 0626 3338Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Leuven, Campus Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Natalie Geyer
- grid.4714.60000 0004 1937 0626Department of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden
| | - Pnina Brodt
- grid.63984.300000 0000 9064 4811Department of Surgery, Oncology and Medicine, McGill University and the Research Institute, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC Canada
| | - Laura Llado
- grid.418284.30000 0004 0427 2257HBP and Liver Transplantation Unit, Department of Surgery, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, IDIBELL, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Catalonia Spain
| | - Laura Van Mileghem
- grid.5284.b0000 0001 0790 3681Translational Cancer Research Unit, GZA Hospitals, Iridium Netwerk and University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Maxim De Schepper
- grid.5596.f0000 0001 0668 7884Laboratory for Translational Breast Cancer Research, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ali W. Majeed
- grid.31410.370000 0000 9422 8284Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Anthoula Lazaris
- grid.63984.300000 0000 9064 4811Cancer Research Program, McGill University Health Centre Research Institute, Montreal, QC Canada
| | - Piet Dirix
- grid.5284.b0000 0001 0790 3681Translational Cancer Research Unit, GZA Hospitals, Iridium Netwerk and University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Qianni Zhang
- grid.4868.20000 0001 2171 1133School of Electronic Engineering and Computer Science, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Stéphanie K. Petrillo
- grid.63984.300000 0000 9064 4811Cancer Research Program, McGill University Health Centre Research Institute, Montreal, QC Canada
| | - Sophie Vankerckhove
- grid.418119.40000 0001 0684 291XDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Ines Joye
- grid.5284.b0000 0001 0790 3681Translational Cancer Research Unit, GZA Hospitals, Iridium Netwerk and University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Yannick Meyer
- grid.508717.c0000 0004 0637 3764Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Alexander Gregorieff
- grid.63984.300000 0000 9064 4811Cancer Research Program, McGill University Health Centre Research Institute, Montreal, QC Canada ,grid.14709.3b0000 0004 1936 8649Department of Pathology, McGill University, Montreal, QC Canada ,grid.14709.3b0000 0004 1936 8649Regenerative Medicine Network, McGill University, Montreal, QC Canada
| | - Nuria Ruiz Roig
- grid.411129.e0000 0000 8836 0780Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Catalonia Spain ,grid.418284.30000 0004 0427 2257Tumoral and Stromal Chemoresistance Group, Oncobell Program, IDIBELL, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Catalonia Spain ,grid.5841.80000 0004 1937 0247Human Anatomy and Embryology Unit, Department of Pathology and Experimental Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia Spain
| | - Fernando Vidal-Vanaclocha
- grid.253615.60000 0004 1936 9510GWU-Cancer Center, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, School of Medicine & Health Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Larsimont Denis
- grid.418119.40000 0001 0684 291XDepartment of Pathology, Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Rui Caetano Oliveira
- grid.28911.330000000106861985Pathology Department, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal ,grid.8051.c0000 0000 9511 4342Clinical Academic Center of Coimbra (CACC), Coimbra, Portugal ,grid.8051.c0000 0000 9511 4342Coimbra Institute for Clinical and Biomedical Research (iCBR) area of Environment Genetics and Oncobiology (CIMAGO), Institute of Biophysics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Peter Metrakos
- grid.63984.300000 0000 9064 4811Cancer Research Program, McGill University Health Centre Research Institute, Montreal, QC Canada
| | - Dirk J. Grünhagen
- grid.508717.c0000 0004 0637 3764Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Iris D. Nagtegaal
- grid.10417.330000 0004 0444 9382Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - David G. Mollevi
- grid.418284.30000 0004 0427 2257Tumoral and Stromal Chemoresistance Group, Oncobell Program, IDIBELL, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Catalonia Spain ,grid.418701.b0000 0001 2097 8389Program Against Cancer Therapeutic Resistance (ProCURE), Institut Català d’Oncologia, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Catalonia Spain
| | - William R. Jarnagin
- grid.51462.340000 0001 2171 9952Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY USA
| | - Michael I D’Angelica
- grid.51462.340000 0001 2171 9952Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY USA
| | - Andrew R. Reynolds
- grid.417815.e0000 0004 5929 4381Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
| | - Michail Doukas
- grid.5645.2000000040459992XDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Christine Desmedt
- grid.5596.f0000 0001 0668 7884Laboratory for Translational Breast Cancer Research, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Luc Dirix
- grid.5284.b0000 0001 0790 3681Translational Cancer Research Unit, GZA Hospitals, Iridium Netwerk and University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Vincent Donckier
- grid.418119.40000 0001 0684 291XDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Peter M. Siegel
- grid.14709.3b0000 0004 1936 8649Department of Medicine, Rosalind and Morris Goodman Cancer Research Institute, McGill University, Montreal, QC Canada ,grid.14709.3b0000 0004 1936 8649Departments of Medicine, Biochemistry, Anatomy & Cell Biology, McGill University, Montreal, QC Canada
| | - Raymond Barnhill
- grid.418596.70000 0004 0639 6384Department of Translational Research, Institut Curie, Paris, France ,Université de Paris l’UFR de Médecine, Paris, France
| | - Marco Gerling
- grid.4714.60000 0004 1937 0626Department of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden ,grid.24381.3c0000 0000 9241 5705Theme Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Sweden
| | - Cornelis Verhoef
- grid.508717.c0000 0004 0637 3764Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Peter B. Vermeulen
- grid.5284.b0000 0001 0790 3681Translational Cancer Research Unit, GZA Hospitals, Iridium Netwerk and University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Inoue Y, Fujishima M, Ono M, Masuda J, Ozaki Y, Maeda T, Uehiro N, Takahashi Y, Kobayashi T, Sakai T, Osako T, Ueno T, Ohno S. Clinical significance of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in oligometastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2022; 196:341-348. [PMID: 36153381 PMCID: PMC9581831 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-022-06726-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2022] [Accepted: 08/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Purpose This study investigated the clinical impact of pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) on survival in patients with oligometastatic breast cancer. Patients and methods We collected data from 397 patients who underwent primary breast surgery from 2004 to 2015 and developed recurrence during the follow-up. We reviewed the images and clinical information and defined OMD according to the European Society for Medical Oncology advanced breast cancer guidelines. The NLR was calculated using pretreatment data of primary breast cancer. The cutoff value of the NLR was determined by receiver operating characteristic curve with Youden Index. Results Among 397 patients, 131 had OMD at recurrence. The low-NLR group included patients of significantly older age at primary cancer than those in the high-NLR group. A low NLR indicated a better overall survival (p = 0.023) after adjusting for relevant factors, including estrogen receptor status, surgical resection of metastatic disease, metastatic organ number, disease-free interval, and liver metastasis than did the high-NLR group. We developed prognostic models for OMD using six independent prognostic factors, including the NLR. The number of factors was associated with overall survival; patients with all six favorable factors showed a good overall survival of 90.9% at 8 years and those with four or more factors showed 70.4%. Conclusions The NLR was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival in OMD. The number of favorable prognostic factors was associated with overall survival. A prognostic model, including the NLR, will help identify patients with a favorable prognosis. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10549-022-06726-w.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuka Inoue
- Breast Surgical Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550 Japan
| | - Makoto Fujishima
- Department of Surgery, Kuma Hospital, Shinkokai Medical Corporation, 8-2-35, Shimoyamate-dori, Chuo-ku, Kobe-shi, Hyogo-ken 650-0011 Japan
| | - Makiko Ono
- Medical Oncology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550 Japan
| | - Jun Masuda
- Breast Medical Oncology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550 Japan
| | - Yukinori Ozaki
- Breast Medical Oncology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550 Japan
| | - Tetsuyo Maeda
- Breast Surgical Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550 Japan
| | - Natsue Uehiro
- Breast Surgical Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550 Japan
| | - Yoko Takahashi
- Breast Surgical Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550 Japan
| | - Takayuki Kobayashi
- Breast Medical Oncology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550 Japan
| | - Takehiko Sakai
- Breast Surgical Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550 Japan
| | - Tomo Osako
- Division of Pathology, The Cancer Institute of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550 Japan
| | - Takayuki Ueno
- Breast Surgical Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550 Japan
| | - Shinji Ohno
- Breast Oncology Center, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550 Japan
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Aristei C, Bölükbaşı Y, Kaidar-Person O, Pfeffer R, Arenas M, Boersma LJ, Ciabattoni A, Coles CE, Franco P, Krengli M, Leonardi MC, Marazzi F, Masiello V, Meattini I, Montero A, Offersen B, Trigo ML, Bourgier C, Genovesi D, Kouloulias V, Morganti AG, Meduri B, Pasinetti N, Pedretti S, Perrucci E, Rivera S, Tombolini V, Vidali C, Valentini V, Poortmans P. Ways to improve breast cancer patients' management and clinical outcome: The 2020 Assisi Think Tank Meeting. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2022; 177:103774. [PMID: 35917884 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2022.103774] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2021] [Revised: 07/19/2022] [Accepted: 07/29/2022] [Indexed: 10/16/2022] Open
Abstract
We report on the third Assisi Think Tank Meeting (ATTM) on breast cancer, a brainstorming project which involved European radiation and clinical oncologists who were dedicated to breast cancer research and treatment. Held on February 2020, the ATTM aimed at identifying key clinical questions in current clinical practice and "grey" areas requiring research to improve management and outcomes. Before the meeting, three key topics were selected: 1) managing patients with frailty due to either age and/or multi-morbidity; 2) stereotactic radiation therapy and systemic therapy in the management of oligometastatic disease; 3) contralateral breast tumour prevention in BCRA-mutated patients. Clinical practice in these areas was investigated by means of an online questionnaire. In the lapse period between the survey and the meeting, the working groups reviewed data, on-going studies and the clinical challenges which were then discussed in-depth and subjected to intense brainstorming during the meeting; research protocols were also proposed. Methodology, outcome of discussions, conclusions and study proposals are summarized in the present paper. In conclusion, this report presents an in-depth analysis of the state of the art, grey areas and controversies in breast cancer radiation therapy and discusses how to confront them in the absence of evidence-based data to guide clinical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cynthia Aristei
- Radiation Oncology Section, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy.
| | - Yasemin Bölükbaşı
- Radiation Oncology Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Orit Kaidar-Person
- Breast Radiation Unit, Radiation Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Raphael Pfeffer
- Oncology Institute, Assuta Medical Center, Tel Aviv and Ben Gurion University Medical School, Israel
| | - Meritxell Arenas
- Universitat Rovira I Virgili, Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Universitari Sant Hoan de Reus, IISPV, Spain
| | - Liesbeth J Boersma
- Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Antonella Ciabattoni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, San Filippo Neri Hospital, ASL Rome 1, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Pierfrancesco Franco
- Depatment of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont and Department of Radiation Oncology, 'Maggiore della Carità' University Hospital, Novara, Italy
| | - Marco Krengli
- Depatment of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont and Department of Radiation Oncology, 'Maggiore della Carità' University Hospital, Novara, Italy
| | | | - Fabio Marazzi
- Unità Operativa di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagine, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli IRCSS Roma, Italy
| | - Valeria Masiello
- Unità Operativa di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagine, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli IRCSS Roma, Italy
| | - Icro Meattini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence & Radiation Oncology Unit - Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Angel Montero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Birgitte Offersen
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Maria Lurdes Trigo
- Service of Brachytherapy, Department of Image and Radioncology, Instituto Português Oncologia Porto Francisco Gentil E.P.E., Portugal
| | - Céline Bourgier
- Radiation Oncology, ICM-Val d'Aurelle, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Domenico Genovesi
- Radiation Oncology, Ospedale Clinicizzato Chieti and University "G. d'Annunzio", Chieti, Italy
| | - Vassilis Kouloulias
- 2(nd) Department of Radiology, Radiotherapy Unit, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
| | - Alessio G Morganti
- Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna; DIMES, Alma Mater Studiorum Bologna University; Bologna, Italy
| | - Bruno Meduri
- Radiation Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Nadia Pasinetti
- Radiation Oncology Service, ASST Valcamonica Esine and Brescia University, Brescia, Italy
| | - Sara Pedretti
- Istituto del Radio "O.Alberti" - Spedali Civili Hospital and Brescia University, Brescia
| | | | - Sofia Rivera
- Radiation Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Vincenzo Tombolini
- Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Science, University "La Sapienza", Roma, Italy
| | - Cristiana Vidali
- former Senior Assistant Department of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Valentini
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Philip Poortmans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Kankernetwerk, Antwerp, Belgium; University of Antwerp, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Antwerp, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Mátrai Z, Kelemen P, Kósa C, Maráz R, Paszt A, Pavlovics G, Sávolt Á, Simonka Z, Tóth D, Kásler M, Kaprin A, Krivorotko P, Vicko F, Pluta P, Kolacinska-Wow A, Murawa D, Jankau J, Ciesla S, Dyttert D, Sabol M, Zhygulin A, Avetisyan A, Bessonov A, Lázár G. Modern Breast Cancer Surgery 1st Central-Eastern European Professional Consensus Statement on Breast Cancer. Pathol Oncol Res 2022; 28:1610377. [PMID: 35783360 PMCID: PMC9240205 DOI: 10.3389/pore.2022.1610377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2022] [Accepted: 04/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
This text is based on the recommendations accepted by the 4th Hungarian Consensus Conference on Breast Cancer, modified on the basis of the international consultation and conference within the frames of the Central-Eastern European Academy of Oncology. The recommendations cover non-operative, intraoperative and postoperative diagnostics, determination of prognostic and predictive markers and the content of cytology and histology reports. Furthermore, they address some specific issues such as the current status of multigene molecular markers, the role of pathologists in clinical trials and prerequisites for their involvement, and some remarks about the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zoltán Mátrai
- Department of Breast and Sarcoma Surgery, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Péter Kelemen
- Department of Breast and Sarcoma Surgery, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Csaba Kósa
- Department of Surgery, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Róbert Maráz
- Bács-Kiskun County Teaching Hospital, Kecskemét, Hungary
| | - Attila Paszt
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, SZTE ÁOK, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | | | - Ákos Sávolt
- Department of Breast and Sarcoma Surgery, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Zsolt Simonka
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, SZTE ÁOK, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Dezső Tóth
- Department of Surgery, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Miklós Kásler
- Minister of Human Capacities, Government of Hungary, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Andrey Kaprin
- National Medical Research Radiological Center of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
| | - Petr Krivorotko
- N.N.Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology, St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - Ferenc Vicko
- Medical Faculty Novi Sad, Oncology Institute of Vojvodina Sremska Kamenica, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia
| | - Piotr Pluta
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Breast Diseases, Polish Mother’s Memorial Hospital–Research Institute in Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Agnieszka Kolacinska-Wow
- Department of Head and Neck Cancer Surgery, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Cancer Center, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Dawid Murawa
- Clinic of Surgical Oncology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland
- General and Oncological Surgery Clinic, Karol Marcinkowski University Hospital, Zielona Gora, Poland
| | - Jerzy Jankau
- Plastic Surgery Department, Medical University of Gdańsk/University Hospitals, Gdansk, Poland
| | - Slawomir Ciesla
- General and Oncological Surgery Clinic, Karol Marcinkowski University Hospital, Zielona Gora, Poland
| | - Daniel Dyttert
- Department of Surgical Oncology, St. Elisabeth Cancer Institute, Medical Faculty, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia
| | - Martin Sabol
- Department of Surgical Oncology, St. Elisabeth Cancer Institute, Medical Faculty, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia
| | | | | | - Alexander Bessonov
- Breast Cancer Department of the LOKOD, N.N.Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology, St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - György Lázár
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, SZTE ÁOK, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Selvarajan G, Dhanushkodi M, Radhakrishnan V, Kalaiyarasi JP, Murali CS, Ananthi B, Iyer P, Krishnamurthy A, Velusamy S, Ganesarajah S, Sagar TG. The continuing conundrum in oligometastatic breast carcinoma: A real-world data. Breast 2022; 63:140-148. [PMID: 35395472 PMCID: PMC8991292 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2022.03.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2021] [Revised: 03/15/2022] [Accepted: 03/17/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
UNLABELLED The optimal management in Oligometastatic (OM) breast carcinoma is not defined. OBJECTIVES To identify the prognostic factors influencing OM and the effect of Locoregional treatment (LRT) on survival in OM. METHODOLOGY Patients with ≤5 metastases and each with ≤ 5 cm size were defined as OM. Data of OM were extracted from the Institute Registry between 2012 and 2018. The impact of prognostic factors on survival was analysed by univariate and multivariate Cox regression. The Kaplan Meier survival curves were used to plot PFS and OS. RESULTS There were 170 patients with OM. The median follow-up was 61 months. Median OS was 43.3 months. The median OS was 74 months in OMD vs 22.7 months in Oligorecurrent disease (ORD) with 5year OS rate of 55.3% vs 16.5% respectively. In the multivariate analyses of OMD both Ki67 ≤ 50% and hormone therapy (HT) showed significant favourable survival outcome. While premenopausal status and HT showed significant survival benefits in ORD. The worse survival outcome in ORD could be because of their aggressive biology and deficit in LRT compared to literature review. The prognostic factors were swayed by the uneven distribution of HR status, grade and Ki67. CONCLUSION The survival of OM was influenced by OMD, Ki67 ≤ 50%, premenopausal status and HT. The lesser survival rates of OM in the long term suggest the need for curative LRT to metastatic sites and primary tumor. The potential role of HT and targeted therapy with or without LRT need to be assessed in future randomised trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gangothri Selvarajan
- Department of Medical Oncology,Cancer Institute (WIA), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Priya Iyer
- Department of Radiation Oncology,Cancer Institute (WIA), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Arvind Krishnamurthy
- Department of Surgical Oncology,Cancer Institute (WIA), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Sridevi Velusamy
- Department of Surgical Oncology,Cancer Institute (WIA), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | | | - Tenali Gnana Sagar
- Department of Medical Oncology,Cancer Institute (WIA), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
He L, Wang X, Liu X, Jia Y, Zhao W, Jia X, Zhu Y, Meng W, Tong Z. Analysis of Clinical Characteristics, Treatment, and Prognostic Factors of 106 Breast Cancer Patients With Solitary Pulmonary Nodules. Front Surg 2022; 9:843913. [PMID: 35242809 PMCID: PMC8885491 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.843913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2021] [Accepted: 01/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective The clinical features of solitary pulmonary nodules (SPN) in breast cancer patients were retrospectively analyzed, and the clinical features of primary lung cancer (PLC) and metastatic pulmonary breast cancer (MBC) in breast cancer patients were compared, and the treatment plan, curative effect and influencing factors were analyzed. Methods The clinical data of 106 patients of SPN combined with breast cancer surgery in our hospital from January 2015 to June 2020 were analyzed. There were 65 patients of PLC and 41 patients of MBC. Record the characteristics of the primary breast cancer lesion in our patient, the interval between the initial diagnosis of breast cancer and the appearance of SPN, the previous treatment history of our patient, and the characteristics and surgical method of SPN. The survival status of all patients during the follow-up period was recorded. Results The onset age, interval, maximum nodule diameter, ER expression positive rate and radiotherapy history ratio of PLC patients were higher than those of MBC patients, and the lymph node positive rate and triple negative rate were lower than those of MBC patients (P < 0.05). Median survival was 51 months in patients with PLC and 37 months in patients with MBC. The 1, 3, and 5 year overall survival rates in patients with PLC were higher than those in patients with MBC (P < 0.05). Vascular tumor thrombus, SPN type and chemotherapy were all independent factors affecting the prognosis of patients with breast cancer combined with SPN (P < 0.05). Conclusion PLC patients and MBC patients have significant differences in pathological characteristics, like the onset age, interval, maximum nodule diameter, ER expression positive rate, radiotherapy history ratio, the lymph node positive rate, and triple negative rate. Septum, vascular tumor thrombus, SPN type, and chemotherapy are all independent factors that affect the curative effect of breast cancer patients with SPN. Based on the nature of SPN, it can provide reference for clinicians to decide the treatment plan, improve patients' quality of life and prolong their survival time.
Collapse
|
15
|
Classification of Breast Cancer. Breast Cancer 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/978-981-16-4546-4_5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
16
|
Diagnostic Performance of [ 18F]FDG PET in Staging Grade 1-2, Estrogen Receptor Positive Breast Cancer. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:diagnostics11111954. [PMID: 34829301 PMCID: PMC8625348 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11111954] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2021] [Revised: 10/13/2021] [Accepted: 10/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Positron emission tomography using [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG PET) potentially underperforms for staging of patients with grade 1–2 estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer. The aim of this study was to retrospectively investigate the diagnostic accuracy of FDG PET in this patient population. Suspect tumor lesions detected on conventional imaging and FDG PET were confirmed with pathology or follow up. PET-positive lesions were (semi)quantified with standardized uptake values (SUV) and these were correlated with various pathological features, including the histological subtype. Pre-operative imaging detected 155 pathologically verified lesions (in 74 patients). A total of 115/155 (74.2%) lesions identified on FDG PET were classified as true positive, i.e., malignant (in 67 patients) and 17/155 (10.8%) lesions as false positive, i.e., benign (in 9 patients); 7/155 (4.5%) as false negative (in 7 patients) and 16/155 (10.3%) as true negative (in 14 patients). FDG PET incorrectly staged 16/70 (22.9%) patients. The FDG uptake correlated with histological subtype, showing higher uptake in ductal carcinoma, compared to lobular carcinoma (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Within this study, FDG PET inadequately staged 22.9% of grade 1–2, ER + BC cases. Incorrect staging can lead to inappropriate treatment choices, potentially affecting survival and quality of life. Prospective studies investigating novel radiotracers are urgently needed.
Collapse
|
17
|
Zengel B, Kilic M, Tasli F, Simsek C, Karatas M, Ozdemir O, Cavdar D, Durusoy R, Bas KK, Uslu A. Breast cancer patients with isolated bone metastases and oligometastatic bone disease show different survival outcomes. Sci Rep 2021; 11:20175. [PMID: 34635748 PMCID: PMC8505657 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-99726-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2021] [Accepted: 09/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
In this study, we planned to investigate the clinical course of patients with breast cancer with oligometastatic bone disease (OMBD). The patients were grouped according to the characteristics and the sites of metastases. Group I included 928 patients without metastasis. Group II, the OMBD group, included 68 patients. Group III, the widespread metastasis group, comprised 185 patients with multiple bone metastases and/or solid organ metastases. The mean overall survival of the groups was 16.7 ± 0.3 years in group 1, and 7.8 ± 0.8 and 5.9 ± 0.4 years in groups 2 and 3, respectively (p < 0.001 for the comparison of all three groups together; p < 0.001 for group 1 vs. 2 and 3) and (p = 0.037 for group 2 vs. group 3). In the subgroup survival analysis of patients in group 2 (OMBD), the mean and median survival was 5.5 ± 0.8 and 4.0 ± 0.8 years vs. 9.2 ± 0.98 and 9.0 ± 1.05 years in patients with more than one bone metastasis and single bone metastasis, respectively (p = 0.019). OMBD seems to be a different disease than breast cancer with isolated bone metastases. The high risk of developing OMBD, especially following locoregional recurrence, increases the importance of locoregional therapy in large T and N stage tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Baha Zengel
- Department of General Surgery, Izmir Bozyaka Health Practice and Research Center, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Izmir, Turkey.
| | - Mustafa Kilic
- Department of General Surgery, Izmir Bozyaka Health Practice and Research Center, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Funda Tasli
- Department of Pathology, Izmir Bozyaka Health Practice and Research Center, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Cenk Simsek
- Department of General Surgery, Izmir Bozyaka Health Practice and Research Center, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Murat Karatas
- Department of General Surgery, Izmir Bozyaka Health Practice and Research Center, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Ozlem Ozdemir
- Department of Medical Oncology, Izmir Bozyaka Health Practice and Research Center, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Demet Cavdar
- Department of Pathology, Izmir Bozyaka Health Practice and Research Center, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Raika Durusoy
- Department of Public Health, Medical Faculty, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Kadir Koray Bas
- Department of General Surgery, Izmir Bozyaka Health Practice and Research Center, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Adam Uslu
- Department of General Surgery, Izmir Bozyaka Health Practice and Research Center, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Izmir, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Intra-Arterial Therapies for Liver Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2021; 44:1868-1882. [PMID: 34322751 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-021-02906-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2021] [Accepted: 06/15/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Performing a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the evidence of intra-arterial therapies in liver metastatic breast cancer (LMBC) patients. METHODS A systemic literature search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS for studies regarding intra-arterial therapies in LMBC patients. Full text studies of LMBC patients (n ≥ 10) published between January 2010 and December 2020 were included when at least one outcome among response rate, adverse events or survival was available. Response rates were pooled using generalized linear mixed models. A weighted estimate of the population median overall survival (OS) was obtained under the assumption of exponentially distributed survival times. RESULTS A total of 26 studies (1266 patients) were included. Eleven articles reported on transarterial radioembolization (TARE), ten on transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and four on chemo-infusion. One retrospective study compared TARE and TACE. Pooled response rates were 49% for TARE (95%CI 32-67%), 34% for TACE (95%CI 22-50%) and 19% for chemo-infusion (95%CI 14-25%). Pooled median survival was 9.2 months (range 6.1-35.4 months) for TARE, 17.8 months (range 4.6-47.0) for TACE and 7.9 months (range 7.0-14.2) for chemo-infusion. No comparison for OS was possible due to missing survival rates at specific time points (1 and 2 year OS) and the large heterogeneity. CONCLUSION Although results have to be interpreted with caution due to the large heterogeneity, the superior response rate of TARE and TACE compared to chemo-infusion suggests first choice of TARE or TACE in chemorefractory LMBC patients. Chemo-infusion could be considered in LMBC patients not suitable for TARE or TACE. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3a.
Collapse
|
19
|
Soran A, Soyder A, Ozbas S, Ozmen V, Karanlik H, Igci A, Muslumanoglu M, Evrensel T, Canturk Z, Utkan Z, Ozaslan C, Uras C, Ugurlu U, Col C, Cabioglu N, Uzunkoy A, Gulluoglu BM, Erdem E, Konca C, Sezgin E. The role of loco-regional treatment in long-term quality of life in de novo stage IV breast cancer patients: protocol MF07-01Q. Support Care Cancer 2021; 29:3823-3830. [PMID: 33242163 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-020-05905-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2020] [Accepted: 11/18/2020] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE Since more solid evidence has emerged supporting the effectiveness of loco-regional treatment (LRT), clinicians consider LRT a treatment option for selected de novo stage IV breast cancer (BC) patients. This is the first report on long-term quality of life (QoL) in a cohort of patients who were randomized to receive either LRT and then systemic treatment (ST) or ST alone in the protocol MF07-01. We aimed to evaluate QoL in patients living at least 3 years since randomization using scores from the SF-12 health survey. METHODS SF-12 (V2) forms were completed during visits of patients who were living 36 months after the randomization. We first calculated PCS-12 (Physical Health Composite Scale) and MCS-12 (Mental Health Composite Scale) scores from de novo stage IV BC patients and compared them with the scores of patients diagnosed with stage I-III BC who lived more than 3 years. Further, PCS-12 and MCS-12 scores were compared between the LRT and ST groups with de novo stage IV BC. Additionally, general health, physical functioning, role functioning, bodily pain, vitality, mental health, and social functioning were evaluated and compared between the groups. Considering age-related changes in QoL, we also compared PCS-12 and MCS-12 scores of patients below or above 55 and 65 years of age. Responses to four additional questions (compare your physical health, mental health, daily activities, and energy currently vs. at diagnosis of BC) were recorded, considering cultural differences. RESULTS There were 81 patients in this analysis; 68% of patients (n = 55) had LRT, and 32% (n = 26) received ST. General health was good or very good in 62% (n = 34) in the LRT group and 66% (n = 17) in the ST-only group (p = 0.63). Mean PCS-12 score was 40.8 + 1.6, and mean MCS-12 score was 43.4 + 2.0 (p = 0.34 and p = 0.54, respectively). PCS-12 and MCS-12 score difference was lower than that of the general Turkish population (PCS-12 = 49.3 + 12.8 and MCS-12 = 46.8 + 13.0) and stage I-III BC patients (PCS-12 = 51.1 ± 0.5, MCS-12 = 45.7 ± 0.6). PCS-12 and MCS-12 scores were similar between the LRT and ST-only groups in patients younger and older than 55 and 65, but QoL scores were much better in stage I-III BC patients younger than 65 when compared to the scores of those with de novo stage IV BC. Although treatment with or without LRT did not affect physical health, mental health, daily activities, and energy at 3 years vs. at diagnosis of BC in de novo stage IV BC patients (p > 0.05), these variables were significantly better in stage I-III BC patients (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION The current MF07-01Q study demonstrates that patient who had LRT has similar physical and mental health outcomes compared to ST only in a cohort of patients who lived longer than 3 years. Trial registration This study is registered on clinicaltrials.gov with identifier number NCT00557986.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Atilla Soran
- Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, 300 Halket St Suite 2601, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Magee-Womens Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| | - Aykut Soyder
- Department of Surgery, Acibadem Altunizade Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Serdar Ozbas
- Breast and Endocrine Surgeon, Private Practice, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Vahit Ozmen
- Department of Surgery, Istanbul University Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Hasan Karanlik
- Surgical Oncology Unit, Istanbul University Institute of Oncology, Capa, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Abdullah Igci
- Department of Surgery, Istanbul University Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Mahmut Muslumanoglu
- Department of Surgery, Istanbul University Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Turkkan Evrensel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Uludag University School of Medicine, Bursa, Turkey
| | - Zafer Canturk
- Department of Surgery, Kocaeli University School of Medicine, Kocaeli, Turkey
| | - Zafer Utkan
- Department of Surgery, Kocaeli University School of Medicine, Kocaeli, Turkey
| | - Cihangir Ozaslan
- Department of Surgery, Ankara Oncology Teaching and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Cihan Uras
- Department of Surgery, Acibadem University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Umit Ugurlu
- Department of Surgery, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Cavit Col
- Department of Surgery, Etimed Hospital, Etimesgut, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Neslihan Cabioglu
- Department of Surgery, Istanbul University Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ali Uzunkoy
- Department of Surgery, Harran University School of Medicine, Sanlıurfa, Turkey
| | - Bahadır M Gulluoglu
- Department of Surgery, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ergun Erdem
- Department of Surgery, Pamukkale University School of Medicine, Denizli, Turkey
| | - Can Konca
- Department of Surgery, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Efe Sezgin
- Department of Food Engineering, Laboratory of Nutrigenomics and Epidemiology, Izmir Institute of Technology, Izmir, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Barberi V, Pietragalla A, Franceschini G, Marazzi F, Paris I, Cognetti F, Masetti R, Scambia G, Fabi A. Oligometastatic Breast Cancer: How to Manage It? J Pers Med 2021; 11:532. [PMID: 34207648 PMCID: PMC8227505 DOI: 10.3390/jpm11060532] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2021] [Revised: 05/28/2021] [Accepted: 06/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer (BC) is the most frequent cancer among women and represents the second leading cause of cancer-specific death. A subset of patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) presents limited disease, termed 'oligometastatic' breast cancer (OMBC). The oligometastatic disease can be managed with different treatment strategies to achieve long-term remission and eventually cure. Several approaches are possible to cure the oligometastatic disease: locoregional treatments of the primary tumor and of all the metastatic sites, such as surgery and radiotherapy; systemic treatment, including target-therapy or immunotherapy, according to the biological status of the primary tumor and/or of the metastases; or the combination of these approaches. Encouraging results involve local ablative options, but these trials are limited by being retrospective and affected by selection bias. Systemic therapy, e.g., the use of CDK4/6 inhibitors for hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER-2 negative BC, leads to an increase of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in all the subgroups, with favorable toxicity. Regardless of the lack of substantial data, this subset of patients could be treated with curative intent; the appropriate candidates could be mostly young women, for whom a multidisciplinary aggressive approach appears suitable. We provide a global perspective on the current treatment paradigms of OMBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vittoria Barberi
- Medical Oncology 1, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, IRCCS, 00144 Rome, Italy; (V.B.); (F.C.)
| | - Antonella Pietragalla
- Scientific Directorate, Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (A.P.); (G.S.)
| | - Gianluca Franceschini
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Multidisciplinary Breast Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy; (G.F.); (R.M.)
| | - Fabio Marazzi
- UOC Radiotherapy, Department of Imaging Diagnostic, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy;
| | - Ida Paris
- Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy;
| | - Francesco Cognetti
- Medical Oncology 1, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, IRCCS, 00144 Rome, Italy; (V.B.); (F.C.)
| | - Riccardo Masetti
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Multidisciplinary Breast Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy; (G.F.); (R.M.)
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Scientific Directorate, Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (A.P.); (G.S.)
| | - Alessandra Fabi
- Unit of Precision Medicine in Breast Cancer, Scientific Directorate, Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Optimal management of oligometastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2021; 279:567-576. [PMID: 34089384 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-021-06918-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2021] [Accepted: 05/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Oligometastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a distinctive subset of metastatic NPC. Imaging examinations and biomarkers can screen out NPC patients with limited number of sites showing metastasis. Past studies have demonstrated the survival advantages of oligometastatic NPC over multiple metastatic NPC. The treatment strategies of de-novo oligometastatic NPC differ owing to the heterogeneity of this disease. This study aims to systematically review the characteristics and treatments of oligometastatic NPC. METHODS PubMed, EMBASE, the Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were used to search for publications with an emphasis on oligometastatic NPC. RESULTS We have presented the current advances on the management of oligometastatic NPC, including the definition, diagnosis, biomarkers, classification, prognosis, subtype, especially systematic therapy, locoregional radiotherapy to the primary tumor, and treatments of the metastatic lesions. CONCLUSIONS More well-designed prospective clinical trials that are exclusive for oligometastatic NPC are warranted to determine the best treatment paradigm.
Collapse
|
22
|
Sytov A, Brenin C, Millard T, Showalter S, Dillon P. Long-Term Non-progression in Metastatic Breast Cancer Beyond 5 Years: Case Series and Review. CURRENT BREAST CANCER REPORTS 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s12609-021-00410-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose of review
Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) was traditionally viewed as homogeneously progressive and incurable among all comers, but there is new evidence that MBC harbors a range of tumor molecular/immune subtypes and degrees of aggressiveness. Thus, MBC is not rapidly fatal in all affected patients.
Recent findings
A small subset of patients will attain long-term disease control, or undetectable disease, and will enjoy a prolonged survival with little disability from their disease or treatment. Though the term is controversial, some patients with long-term non-detectable disease may effectively be considered “cured”. To best advise treatment options in these patients, it is imperative to identify patients most likely to benefit from aggressive treatment.
Summary
In this review, we delineate the clinical, pathologic, and disease characteristics associated with long-term non-progression in MBC. We include a single institution case series of long-term non-progressive MBC patients and their characteristics as an example of the frequency of this sub-population of MBC. Future prospective trials are warranted to examine the utility of clinical characteristics as predictors of long-term survival in MBC.
Collapse
|
23
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To critically analyze the available evidence on oligometastatic breast cancer and to suggest therapeutic approaches for optimal management of these patients. RECENT FINDINGS Unlike metastatic breast cancer, which remains incurable, patients with a limited number and extent of metastatic lesions, that is, oligometastatic disease, might achieve disease control and long-term survival when radical therapy of the primary tumor, if present, and metastatic disease is added to standard systemic therapy. However, the lack of a clear definition, variety of presentations, and the absence of biomarkers makes oligometastatic breast cancer a poorly understood clinical entity for which there is no standard treatment. SUMMARY Improvements in systemic therapies along with radical treatment of the primary tumor and metastatic lesions, together with optimization in the use of imaging tools, may help to increase the percentage of patients with metastatic breast cancer who achieve no-evidence-of-disease status or, at least, chronification of the disease. However, the fundamental question remains: which patients may benefit the most from a radical therapeutic approach? In this article, we propose strategies for the appropriate selection and comprehensive management of these patients.
Collapse
|
24
|
Bohlok A, Vermeulen P, Leduc S, Latacz E, Botzenhart L, Richard F, De Schepper M, Geukens T, Lucidi V, Ignatiadis M, Aftimos P, Sotiriou C, Piccart M, Hendlisz A, Van Laere S, Dirix L, Noël JC, Biganzoli E, Larsimont D, Desmedt C, Donckier V. Association between the histopathological growth patterns of liver metastases and survival after hepatic surgery in breast cancer patients. NPJ Breast Cancer 2020; 6:64. [PMID: 33339824 PMCID: PMC7749172 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-020-00209-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2020] [Accepted: 11/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Currently, there are no markers to identify patients with liver-only or liver-dominant metastases that would benefit from hepatic surgery. Here we characterized histopathological growth patterns (HGPs) of liver metastases in a consecutive series of 36 breast cancer patients who underwent hepatic surgery. Survival analyses showed that the presence of a desmoplastic HGP in the liver metastases (a rim of fibrous tissue separating cancer cells from the liver parenchyma, present in 20 (56%) patients) is independently associated with favorable progression-free and overall survival when compared with the replacement HGP (cancer cells growing into the liver parenchyma, present in 16 (44%) patients).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Bohlok
- Department of Surgery, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Peter Vermeulen
- Translational Cancer Research Unit, GZA Hospitals & CORE, MIPRO, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Oncological Research, Oncology Center, GZA Hospitals Sint-Augustinus, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Sophia Leduc
- Laboratory for Translational Breast Cancer Research, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Emily Latacz
- Translational Cancer Research Unit, GZA Hospitals & CORE, MIPRO, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Lara Botzenhart
- Department of Oncological Research, Oncology Center, GZA Hospitals Sint-Augustinus, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - François Richard
- Laboratory for Translational Breast Cancer Research, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Maxim De Schepper
- Laboratory for Translational Breast Cancer Research, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Tatjana Geukens
- Laboratory for Translational Breast Cancer Research, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Valerio Lucidi
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Michail Ignatiadis
- Medical Oncology Clinic, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Philippe Aftimos
- Clinical Trials Conduct Unit, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Christos Sotiriou
- Breast Cancer Translational Lab, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Martine Piccart
- Medical Oncology Clinic, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Alain Hendlisz
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Steven Van Laere
- Translational Cancer Research Unit, GZA Hospitals & CORE, MIPRO, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Luc Dirix
- Translational Cancer Research Unit, GZA Hospitals & CORE, MIPRO, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Oncological Research, Oncology Center, GZA Hospitals Sint-Augustinus, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Jean-Christophe Noël
- Department of Pathology, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Elia Biganzoli
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health & DSRC, University of Milan, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Denis Larsimont
- Department of Pathology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Christine Desmedt
- Laboratory for Translational Breast Cancer Research, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Vincent Donckier
- Department of Surgery, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Zhao J, Yang Y, Pang D, Yu Y, Lin X, Chen K, Ye G, Tang J, Hu Q, Chai J, Bi Z, Ding L, Wu W, Zeng Y, Gui X, Liu D, Yao H, Wang Y. Development and validation of a nomogram in survival prediction among advanced breast cancer patients. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2020; 8:1446. [PMID: 33313191 PMCID: PMC7723627 DOI: 10.21037/atm-20-3473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2020] [Accepted: 08/12/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The overall survival (OS) among patients with advanced breast cancer (ABC) varies greatly. Although molecular subtype is known as the most important factor in OS differentiation, significant differences in OS among patients with the same molecular subtype still occur, leading to the need for a more accurate prognostic prediction model. This study aimed to develop a prediction model (nomogram) based on current diagnosis and treatment to predict the OS of newly diagnosed ABC patients in China. METHODS From the institution's database, we collected data of 368 ABC patients from Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital (national hospital) as a training set to establish a nomogram with prognostic risk factors that calculated the predicted probability of survival. Nomograms were independently validated with 278 patients with ABC from two other institutions using the concordance index (C-index), calibration plots and risk group stratifications. RESULTS The initial primary tumor stage, molecular subtype, disease-free survival (DFS), presence of brain metastasis, and the tumor burden of metastasis disease (local recurrence, oligo-metastatic disease, or multiple-metastatic disease) were included in the prognostic nomogram. The nomogram had a C-index of 0.77 and 0.71 in the training and the validation sets, respectively. The nomogram was able to stratify patients into different risk groups, respectively (HR 6.81, 95% CI: 4.69 to 9.89, P<0.001). In the lower risk score group (risk score <11), there was no significant difference between the OS with chemotherapy and hormone therapy (HR 0.81, 95% CI: 0.44 to 1.47, P=0.48). CONCLUSIONS We have constructed a novel prediction nomogram that can guide the physicians to select personalized treatment options. Furthermore, our study is the first to add oligo-metastatic disease and primary endocrine/trastuzumab resistance into the prognostic models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianli Zhao
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Guangzhou Regenerative Medicine and Health Guangdong Laboratory, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Breast Tumor Center, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yaping Yang
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Guangzhou Regenerative Medicine and Health Guangdong Laboratory, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Breast Tumor Center, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Danmei Pang
- Department of Breast Cancer Oncology. Foshan the First Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Foshan, China
| | - Yunfang Yu
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Guangzhou Regenerative Medicine and Health Guangdong Laboratory, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiao Lin
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Guangzhou Regenerative Medicine and Health Guangdong Laboratory, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Breast Tumor Center, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Kai Chen
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Guangzhou Regenerative Medicine and Health Guangdong Laboratory, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Breast Tumor Center, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Guolin Ye
- Department of Breast Surgery. Foshan the First Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Foshan, China
| | - Jun Tang
- Department of Breast Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qian Hu
- Department of Breast Cancer Oncology. Foshan the First Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Foshan, China
| | - Jie Chai
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Guangzhou Regenerative Medicine and Health Guangdong Laboratory, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Breast Tumor Center, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhuofei Bi
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Guangzhou Regenerative Medicine and Health Guangdong Laboratory, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Linxiaoxiao Ding
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Guangzhou Regenerative Medicine and Health Guangdong Laboratory, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Breast Tumor Center, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wenjing Wu
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Guangzhou Regenerative Medicine and Health Guangdong Laboratory, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Breast Tumor Center, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yinduo Zeng
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Guangzhou Regenerative Medicine and Health Guangdong Laboratory, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Breast Tumor Center, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiujuan Gui
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Guangzhou Regenerative Medicine and Health Guangdong Laboratory, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Breast Tumor Center, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Donggeng Liu
- Breast Tumor Center, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Herui Yao
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Guangzhou Regenerative Medicine and Health Guangdong Laboratory, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Breast Tumor Center, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ying Wang
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Guangzhou Regenerative Medicine and Health Guangdong Laboratory, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Breast Tumor Center, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Marazzi F, Orlandi A, Manfrida S, Masiello V, Di Leone A, Massaccesi M, Moschella F, Franceschini G, Bria E, Gambacorta MA, Masetti R, Tortora G, Valentini V. Diagnosis and Treatment of Bone Metastases in Breast Cancer: Radiotherapy, Local Approach and Systemic Therapy in a Guide for Clinicians. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12092390. [PMID: 32846945 PMCID: PMC7563945 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12092390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2020] [Revised: 08/13/2020] [Accepted: 08/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The standard care for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is systemic therapies with imbrication of focal treatment for symptoms. Recently, thanks to implementation of radiological and metabolic exams and development of new target therapies, oligometastatic and oligoprogressive settings are even more common-paving the way to a paradigm change of focal treatments role. In fact, according to immunophenotype, radiotherapy can be considered with radical intent in these settings of patients. The aim of this literature review is to analyze available clinical data on prognosis of bone metastases from breast cancer and benefits of available treatments for developing a practical guide for clinicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabio Marazzi
- “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario, 00168 Roma, Italy; (F.M.); (S.M.); (M.M.); (M.A.G.); (V.V.)
| | - Armando Orlandi
- “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, UOC di Oncologia Medica, Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario, 00168 Roma, Italy; (A.O.); (E.B.); (G.T.)
| | - Stefania Manfrida
- “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario, 00168 Roma, Italy; (F.M.); (S.M.); (M.M.); (M.A.G.); (V.V.)
| | - Valeria Masiello
- “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario, 00168 Roma, Italy; (F.M.); (S.M.); (M.M.); (M.A.G.); (V.V.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Alba Di Leone
- “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, UOC di Chirurgia Senologica, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario, 00168 Roma, Italy; (A.D.L.); (F.M.); (G.F.); (R.M.)
| | - Mariangela Massaccesi
- “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario, 00168 Roma, Italy; (F.M.); (S.M.); (M.M.); (M.A.G.); (V.V.)
| | - Francesca Moschella
- “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, UOC di Chirurgia Senologica, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario, 00168 Roma, Italy; (A.D.L.); (F.M.); (G.F.); (R.M.)
| | - Gianluca Franceschini
- “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, UOC di Chirurgia Senologica, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario, 00168 Roma, Italy; (A.D.L.); (F.M.); (G.F.); (R.M.)
- Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Roma, Italy
| | - Emilio Bria
- “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, UOC di Oncologia Medica, Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario, 00168 Roma, Italy; (A.O.); (E.B.); (G.T.)
- Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Roma, Italy
| | - Maria Antonietta Gambacorta
- “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario, 00168 Roma, Italy; (F.M.); (S.M.); (M.M.); (M.A.G.); (V.V.)
- Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Roma, Italy
| | - Riccardo Masetti
- “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, UOC di Chirurgia Senologica, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario, 00168 Roma, Italy; (A.D.L.); (F.M.); (G.F.); (R.M.)
- Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Roma, Italy
| | - Giampaolo Tortora
- “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, UOC di Oncologia Medica, Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario, 00168 Roma, Italy; (A.O.); (E.B.); (G.T.)
- Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Roma, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Valentini
- “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario, 00168 Roma, Italy; (F.M.); (S.M.); (M.M.); (M.A.G.); (V.V.)
- Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Roma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Weykamp F, König L, Seidensaal K, Forster T, Hoegen P, Akbaba S, Mende S, Welte SE, Deutsch TM, Schneeweiss A, Debus J, Hörner-Rieber J. Extracranial Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Oligometastatic or Oligoprogressive Breast Cancer. Front Oncol 2020; 10:987. [PMID: 32676455 PMCID: PMC7333735 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00987] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2019] [Accepted: 05/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose/Objective: Oligometastatic disease (OMD) and oligoprogressive disease (OPD) describe tumor states with a limited metastasization. In contrast to other disease states, treatment of OMD or OPD has not yet become common for breast cancer. We sought to understand the outcomes and toxicities of this treatment paradigm. Material/Methods: We retrospectively analyzed female breast cancer patients with OMD (≤3 metastases) or OPD (1 progressive lesion) who received stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for their respective extracranial metastatic lesions between 01/2002 and 07/2019. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank test being used for evaluation of significance. Cox regression was used to detect prognostic outcome factors. Toxicity was evaluated using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v. 5.0). Results: Forty-six patients (70% OMD; 30% OPD) with 58 lesions met criteria for inclusion. The majority of treatments (34 out of 58; 58.6%) were delivered from 2017 to 2018. Treatment sites were bone, liver, lung [n = 19 (33%) for each site], and adrenal gland [n = 1 (1%)]. Median biologically effective dose (BED at α/β = 10) was 81.6 Gy (range: 45-112.5 Gy) and median planning target volume was 36.60 mL (range: 3.76-311.00 mL). At 2 years, local control (LC) was 89%, distant control (DC) was 44%, progression free survival (PFS) was 17% and overall survival (OS) was 62%. Multivariate analysis identified the diagnosis of a solitary metastasis as an independent prognostic factor for superior DC (HR = 0.186, CI [0.055; 0.626], p = 0.007) and PFS (HR = 0.363, CI [0.152; 0.863], p = 0.022). OS was independently inferior for patients treated at a higher age (HR = 5.788, CI [1.077; 31.119] p = 0.041). Nine (15.5%) grade I° and one (1.7%) grade II° toxicities were recorded, with no grade III° or higher toxicities. Conclusion: Extracranial SBRT in breast cancer patients with OMD or OPD was well-tolerated with excellent LC. SBRT should especially be offered to younger OMD and OPD breast cancer patients with only one metastasis. The increase in utilization since 2017 points toward a growing acceptance of SBRT for OMD and OPD in breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabian Weykamp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Laila König
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Katharina Seidensaal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tobias Forster
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Philipp Hoegen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sati Akbaba
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stephan Mende
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan E. Welte
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas M. Deutsch
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juliane Hörner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Tehrani OS. Systemic Treatments in Pregnancy-Associated Breast Cancer. ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY 2020; 1252:115-124. [PMID: 32816270 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-41596-9_15] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Available data on systemic treatments in pregnancy-associated breast cancer (PABC) is reviewed in this section. These treatments include chemotherapy, endocrine therapy (ET), small molecule inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies against human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (EGFR-2) also known as HER2; and human epidermal growth factor receptor 3 (EGFR-3), also known as HER3.In local disease, systemic treatment can be delivered as neoadjuvant (before surgery) or adjuvant (after surgery) treatment. In metastatic disease, systemic therapy is the main modality of treatment.Approach to PABC is based on available data in the general population, limited only by safety issues for use of medications during gestation and lactation. Therefore, treatments are similar to non-PABC patients while trying to minimize the risk to the fetus. Available data on different chemotherapies, anti-HER2 monoclonal antibodies, ET and small molecule inhibitors are discussed in detail.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omid S Tehrani
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Tomita M, Oura S, Makimoto S. A Case of Locally Advanced Breast Cancer Successfully Treated with Multidisciplinary Therapy. Case Rep Oncol 2020; 13:261-265. [PMID: 32308587 PMCID: PMC7154267 DOI: 10.1159/000506195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2020] [Accepted: 01/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
A 42-year-old woman with locally advanced luminal breast cancer was referred to our hospital. Ultrasonography showed marked skin thickening with obscured breast mass. Positron emission tomography showed bilateral swelling in the axillar, parasternal, and supraclavicular lymph nodes in addition to the primary breast cancer. Following the patient's request, we treated her with primary bevacizumab-containing chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy to the breast due to the histologically proven widely spreading cancer remnants in the skin after chemotherapy. Thereafter, the patient underwent mastectomy and axillary dissection with a vertical rectus abdominis musculo-cutaneous flap to cover the skin defect. Pathological examination showed no viable cancer cells both in the breast and lymph nodes but imperceptible cytokeratin AE1 + 3-positive cells in the skin. Although wound healing needed 3 months due to the influence of preoperative radiotherapy, the patient has been well on endocrine therapy without any recurrence for more than 7 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masafumi Tomita
- Department of Surgery, Kishiwada Tokushukai Hospital, Kishiwada, Japan
| | - Shoji Oura
- Division of Breast Surgery, Kishiwada Tokushukai Hospital, Kishiwada, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Savard MF, Khan O, Hunt KK, Verma S. Redrawing the Lines: The Next Generation of Treatment in Metastatic Breast Cancer. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2019; 39:e8-e21. [PMID: 31099662 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_237419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Although not considered curative in nature, new therapeutic advances in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) have substantially improved patient outcomes. This article discusses the state-of-the-art and emerging therapeutic options for management of MBC. BC systemic therapy targets multiple key pathways, including estrogen receptor signaling, HER2 signaling, and phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (AKT)/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling. Other therapeutic strategies include targeting DNA repair, inhibiting immune checkpoints, and developing antibody-drug conjugates. Although surgery historically was reserved for palliation of symptomatic, large, or ulcerating masses, some data suggest a possibly expanding role for more aggressive locoregional therapy in combination with systemic therapy. As technology develops, biomarker-specific, line-agnostic, and receptor-agnostic treatment strategies will redraw the current lines of MBC care. However, tumor heterogeneity remains a challenge. To effectively reshape our approach to MBC, careful consideration of the patient perspective, the costs and value of novel treatments, and accessibility (especially in developing countries) is paramount.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie-France Savard
- 1 Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Omar Khan
- 1 Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Kelly K Hunt
- 2 Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, Division of Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Centre, Houston, TX
| | - Sunil Verma
- 1 Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|