Rehabilitation and surgical management of ankylosing spondylitis

Analysis of Physical Therapy in Ankylosing Spondylitis

Aim: The aim of the study was to assess the efficacy of physical therapy methods used in AS patients. Materials and Methods: The study group comprised of 30 individuals with ankylosing spondylitis aged 30 to 67 years, including 5 women and 25 men. The mean age was 43.4 years in women and 41.76 years in men. The largest patient group consisted of men aged 30 to 40 years. All patients lived in the Świętokrzyskie Voivodeship. The study used a diagnostic survey based on a questionnaire created by the authors. Study patients underwent physical therapy in the form of electrotherapy, laser therapy, ultrasound therapy, magnetic field therapy, cryotherapy, kinesiotherapy and massage. Results: The study showed that physical therapy reduced pain severity and increased the level of everyday functioning. Both the sign test (p-value≈0) and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test (p-value≈0) showed a significant difference in pain severity measured before rehabilitation vs. after rehabilitation (significance level, α=0.05). Conclusions: Physical therapy and rehabilitation is a key part of treatment in this group of patients.

Two-Level Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy in Lateral Position for an Ankylosing Spondylitis Patient With Severe Thoracolumbar Kyphosis and Hip Flexion Contracture: A Case Report

BACKGROUND AND IMPORTANCE

Spinal osteotomy and total hip replacement (THR) are the most common surgical interventions for ankylosing spondylitis (AS). It is recommended that patients with AS with severe thoracolumbar kyphotic deformity (TLKD) and flexed hips receive spinal osteotomy before THR to reduce the risk of hip prosthesis dislocation after THR. Standardly, spinal osteotomy is performed in the prone position; however, it is impractical to place patients with AS with kyphosis and closed hips in a prone position. In this report, we present an AS case with severe TLKD and closed hips who underwent spinal osteotomy in a lateral position first, then THR in the second stage.

CLINICAL PRESENTATION

The patient with AS was a 40-year-old woamn with severe TLKD and a closed hip. Back pain, difficulty walking, and gaze loss are the chief complaints. In consideration of the infeasibility of adopting the prone position, the patient was placed in a lateral position and underwent 2-level pedicle subtraction osteotomy at L1 and L3 with a long instrumentation from T10 to S1 at the first stage. Then, THR was performed at the second stage. The patient achieved pain relief, horizontal gaze, and nearly normal ambulation after spinal deformity correction and THR. After 2-year follow-up, the spinal alignment remains good and hip function was satisfactory.

DISCUSSION

The sequence of spinal osteotomy and THR performed for AS patients with TLKD and hip flexion contracture remains inconclusive. According to previous studies, patients treated with THR under a sagittal malaligned spine may require revision of the acetabular component to accommodate to the re-orientated acetabula resulting from the subsequent spinal osteotomy and realignment. Thus, we believe it is more reasonable to perform spinal osteotomy first. For osteotomy in lateral position, one of the key points is that the operation table should be tilted away from the surgeon side at a certain angle. Another point is that contralateral cancellous bone should be removed as much as possible when performing osteotomy at the side of vertebral away from the table. The satisfactory outcomes of this case revealed the feasibility of osteotomy in a lateral position for such severe AS with closed hip.

CONCLUSION

Performing double-level spinal osteotomy in a lateral position first could be an alternative for patients with AS who cannot be placed in the prone position because of the severe deformity of the spine and hips.

Improvement of Sleep Quality in Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis Kyphosis After Corrective Surgery

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to investigate the changes in sleep quality in patients surgically treated for kyphosis due to ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and the correlation between these changes and spinal sagittal realignment.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Sleep problems are prevalent in AS patients. However, little attention has been paid to the sleep quality in patients with AS kyphosis and the effect of surgical intervention on sleep quality.

METHODS

We have retrospectively reviewed 62 patients with AS-induced thoracolumbar kyphosis who underwent surgically treatment from October 2012 to November 2016. Sleep quality was evaluated by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) questionnaire. Preoperative and postoperative radiological characteristics and supine function were documented. We compared the above-mentioned parameters pre- and 24 months postoperatively and analyzed the correlation of the changes in the PSQI with the changes in radiological characteristics.

RESULTS

Fifity-one patients (82%) classified as poor sleepers preoperatively. In addition to use of sleeping medication, each domain of the PSQI and the total PSQI were increased postoperatively. Improved sleep quality was correlated with changes in spinal sagittal characteristics, among which the lumbar lordosis (LL) and the chin-brow vertical angle (CBVA) were the independent correlation factors. The number of patients with supine dysfunction decreased from 89% to 15% after surgery. Significant differences were identified in the PSQI scores between the patients with and without supine dysfunction either pre- or postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

Surgical correction of spinal deformity may improve sleep quality and supine function in patients with AS. Spinal sagittal realignment may be correlated with the improvement of sleep quality.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Vertebral column decancellation: a new spinal osteotomy technique for correcting rigid thoracolumbar kyphosis in patients with ankylosing spondylitis

AIMS

The aim of this study is to introduce and investigate the efficacy and feasibility of a new vertebral osteotomy technique, vertebral column decancellation (VCD), for rigid thoracolumbar kyphotic deformity (TLKD) secondary to ankylosing spondylitis (AS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We took 39 patients from between January 2009 and January 2013 (26 male, 13 female, mean age 37.4 years, 28 to 54) with AS and a TLKD who underwent VCD (VCD group) and compared their outcome with 45 patients (31 male, 14 female, mean age 34.8 years, 23 to 47) with AS and TLKD, who underwent pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO group), according to the same selection criteria. The technique of VCD was performed at single vertebral level in the thoracolumbar region of AS patients according to classification of AS kyphotic deformity. Pre- and post-operative chin-brow vertical angle (CBVA), sagittal vertical axis (SVA) and sagittal Cobb angle in the thoracolumbar region were reviewed in the VCD and PSO groups. Intra- , post-operative and general complications were analysed in both group.

RESULTS

lf patients could lie on their backs and walk with horizontal vision and sagittal profile, radiographic parameters improved significantly post-operatively in both groups. No major acute complications such as death or complete paralysis occurred in either group. In the VCD group, five patients (12.8%) experienced complications such as severe CSF leak (n = 4), deep wound infection (n = 1) and in one patient a transient neurological deficit occurred. In the PSO group, eight patients (17.8%) suffered conditions such as severe CSF leak (n = 5), infections (n = 2) and sagittal translation at osteotomy site (n = 1). Scoliosis Research Society outcomes instrument (SRS-22) improved significantly in both groups. All patients achieved solid fusion at latest follow-up and no implant failures were noted in either group.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

The VCD technique is a new, safe and effective strategy for correction of rigid TLKD in AS patients. The main advantage of the new correction mechanism is that it achieved a satisfactory correction by controlled anterior column opening and posterior column closing, avoiding the occurrence of sagittal translation. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:672-8.

Indirect and direct costs of treating patients with ankylosing spondylitis in the Brazilian public health system

INTRODUCTION

Patients with ankylosing spondylitis require a team approach from multiple professionals, various treatment modalities for continuous periods of time, and can lead to the loss of labour capacity in a young population. So, it is necessary to measure its socio-economic impact.

OBJECTIVES

To describe the use of public resources to treat AS in a tertiary hospital after the use of biological medications was approved for treating spondyloarthritis in the Health Public System, establishing approximate values for the direct and indirect costs of treating this illness in Brazil.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

93 patients selected from the ambulatory spondyloarthritis clinic at the Hospital de Clínicas of the Federal University of Paraná between September 2011 and September 2012 had their direct costs indirect treatment costs estimation.

RESULTS

70 patients (75.28%) were male and 23 (24.72%) female. The mean age was 43.95 years. The disease duration was calculated based on the age of diagnosis and the mean was 8.92 years (standard deviation: 7.32); 63.44% were using anti-tumour necrotic factor drugs. Comparing male and female patients the mean Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index was 4.64 and 5.49 while the mean Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index was 5.03 and 6.35 respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The Brazilian public health system's spending related to ankylosing spondylitis has increased in recent years. An important part of these costs is due to the introduction of new, more expensive health technologies, as in the case of nuclear magnetic resonance and, mainly, the incorporation of anti-tumour necrotic factor therapy into the therapeutic arsenal. The mean annual direct and indirect cost to the Brazilian public health system to treat a patient with ankylosing spondylitis, according to our findings, is US$ 23,183.56.

Lumbar subcutaneous edema and degenerative spinal disease in patients with low back pain: a retrospective MRI study

PURPOSE

This study was designed to determine the association between LSE, spondylolisthesis, facet arthropathy, lumbar canal stenosis, BMI, radiculopathy and bone marrow edema at conventional lumbar spine MR imaging.

METHODS

This is a retrospective radiological study; 441 consecutive patients with low back pain (224 men and 217 women; mean age 57.3 years; mean BMI 26) underwent conventional lumbar MRI using a 1.5-T magnet (Avanto, Siemens). Lumbar MR images were reviewed by consensus for the presence of LSE, spondylolisthesis, facet arthropathy, lumbar canal stenosis, radiculopathy and bone marrow edema. Descriptive statistics and association studies were conducted using STATA software 11.0. Association studies have been performed using linear univariate regression analysis and multivariate regression analysis, considering LSE as response variable.

RESULTS

The overall prevalence of LSE was 40%; spondylolisthesis (p = 0.01), facet arthropathy (p < 0.001), BMI (p = 0.008) and lumbar canal stenosis (p < 0.001) were included in the multivariate regression model, whereas bone marrow edema, radiculopathy and age were not.

CONCLUSIONS

LSE is highly associated with spondylolisthesis, facet arthropathy and BMI, suggesting underestimation of its clinical impact as an integral component in chronic lumbar back pain. Longitudinal simultaneous X-ray/MRI studies should be conducted to test the relationship of LSE with lumbar spinal instability and low back pain.

Decision making regarding spinal osteotomy and total hip replacement for ankylosing spondylitis

Few studies have examined the order in which a spinal osteotomy and total hip replacement (THR) are to be performed for patients with ankylosing spondylitis. We have retrospectively reviewed 28 consecutive patients with ankylosing spondylitis who underwent both a spinal osteotomy and a THR from September 2004 to November 2012. In the cohort 22 patients had a spinal osteotomy before a THR (group 1), and six patients had a THR before a spinal osteotomy (group 2). The mean duration of follow-up was 3.5 years (2 to 9). The spinal sagittal Cobb angle of the vertebral osteotomy segment was corrected from a pre-operative kyphosis angle of 32.4 (SD 15.5°) to a post-operative lordosis 29.6 (SD 11.2°) (p < 0.001). Significant improvements in pain, function and range of movement were observed following THR. In group 2, two of six patients had an early anterior dislocation. The spinal osteotomy was performed two weeks after the THR. At follow-up, no hip has required revision in either group. Although this non-comparative study only involved a small number of patients, given our experience, we believe a spinal osteotomy should be performed prior to a THR, unless the deformity is so severe that the procedure cannot be performed.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:360–5.