Does a brace influence clinical outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair?

Effect of abduction brace wearing angle on clinical outcomes after arthroscopic repair of large repairable rotator cuff: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Rotator cuff tears affect approximately 20% of the population and are usually repaired arthroscopically. The clinical outcomes of these repairs are influenced by multiple factors, including patient characteristics, surgical technique, and postoperative management. Postoperative shoulder posture, particularly the degree of abduction, plays an important role in repair site tension and tendon-bone healing. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes and repair integrity of patients undergoing arthroscopic repair of large rotator cuff tears using a 30° and 45° abduction brace.

METHODS

A total of 82 patients with symptomatic full-thickness rotator cuff tears were included in this study. The control group included 40 patients using a 30° brace, and the study group included 42 patients using a 45° abduction brace. Visual analogue scales (VAS) and humerohumeral range of motion were obtained before surgery and at 1 month (M1), 3 months (M3), and 6 months (M6) after surgery. Shoulder function scores (including Constant-Murley (CMS), University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores) and retear rates were assessed at final follow-up (24 months).

RESULTS

Early passive ROM (flexion at 1 month, abduction at 1 and 3 months, external rotation at 1 and 3 months) was significantly better in the study group (45° abduction brace, P < 0.05). At 24 months, there were no significant differences in shoulder range of motion, function scores, and retear rates between the two groups (P > 0.05). Of note, in subgroup analysis, the retear rate was lower with a 45° brace than with a 30° brace under moderate to severe repair tension (16.67% vs. 44.44%, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that immobilization with a 45° brace rather than a 30° abduction brace after arthroscopic repair of large rotator cuff tears results in better passive range of motion during early follow-up, particularly with lower retear rates at moderate to severe repair strains.

Inordinate attention to minor pathophysiology variations in musculoskeletal research: example of rotator cuff tendinopathy

BACKGROUND

Evidence suggests variation in pathophysiology is less relevant to musculoskeletal illness than variation in mental health factors. For diseases such as rotator cuff tendinopathy, attention may be placed on aspects of tendon thinning and suture techniques when studies show that variations in muscle quality and defect size have limited association with comfort and capability compared with variations in thoughts and feelings regarding symptoms. Using rotator cuff tendinopathy as an example, we studied the degree to which research addresses relatively minor degrees of variation in pathophysiology and relatively minor differences in treatments to better understand the relative emphasis on pathophysiology. We asked the following questions: What factors are associated with relative pathophysiology severity in comparative therapeutic studies of musculoskeletal conditions? What factors are associated with relative differences in interventions in comparative therapeutic studies of musculoskeletal conditions?

METHODS

We systematically reviewed clinical trials of patients with rotator cuff tendinopathy for the relative severity of pathophysiology (low, moderate, or high) and variation in interventions (minimal, moderate, or large). An example of a relatively minor variation in rotator cuff tendon pathophysiology is bursal- vs. articular-sided thinning of the tendon. An example of a relatively minor variation in treatment is single- vs. double-row defect closure.

RESULTS

Most studies of rotator cuff tendinopathy treatment addressed low (39%) or medium (50%) levels of pathophysiology. Greater relative pathology severity was independently associated with operative treatment (odds ratio, 12 [95% confidence interval, 3.2-45]; P < .001). Of 127 studies, 113 (89%) were rated as comparing treatments with minimal difference.

CONCLUSION

Despite the evidence of limited variation in comfort and capability due to pathophysiological variations, a large percentage of research on rotator cuff tendinopathy addresses relatively limited severity of pathophysiology and relatively minor variations in treatment. This may be typical of musculoskeletal research and suggests a possibility of focusing, on the one hand, on more impactful interventions such as treatments that can delay or avoid rotator cuff arthropathy and, on the other hand, on management strategies that optimize accommodation of common age-related changes in the rotator cuff tendons.

Online Videos Regarding Relevant Postoperative Patient Information and Postoperative Rehabilitation After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Provide Poor Information Quality, Accuracy, and Reliability

PURPOSE

To evaluate the information quality, accuracy, and reliability of YouTube videos regarding relevant postoperative patient information and postoperative rehabilitation after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

METHODS

By use of The Onion Router (TOR) software and predefined search terms, 102 videos were assessed. Four scoring systems were used to evaluate included videos: (1) Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria score; (2) Global Quality Score (GQS); (3) DISCERN score; and (4) a newly developed score, the Rotator Cuff Score (RCS). The RCS (0-30 points) was built based on the latest published evidence and guidelines from the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Videos that scored up to 9 points were regarded as poor-quality videos.

RESULTS

Most of the included videos provided poor information quality, accuracy, and reliability. Videos that were uploaded by medically trained professionals showed significantly better results for all scores compared with commercial or personal-testimony videos (JAMA benchmark criteria score, P < .001; GQS, P < .001; DISCERN score, P = .001; and RCS, P = .001). Multivariate linear regression showed that the involvement of medically trained professionals was a significant predictor of better results for all scores (JAMA benchmark criteria score, β = 1.496 [P < .001]; GQS, β = 1.105 [P < .001]; DISCERN score, β = 11.234 [P < .001]; and RCS, β = 5.017 [P < .001]). Surprisingly, the like ratio was significantly higher for videos that were uploaded by non-medically trained individuals (P = .041).

CONCLUSIONS

The average information quality, accuracy, and reliability of YouTube videos regarding relevant postoperative patient information and postoperative rehabilitation after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair are poor. Videos from medically trained professionals provide significantly higher information quality; however, even these videos lack important information for a better understanding of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Because of the lack of a peer-review process, available videos on YouTube regarding relevant postoperative patient information and postoperative rehabilitation after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair are of low quality, accuracy, and reliability. However, patients increasingly visit YouTube to gather medical knowledge. Physicians should enlighten patients about these findings and should be able to provide alternative sources of high-quality information.

Positioning efficacy and comfort profile of shoulder support braces: A randomized repeated-measures study using three-dimensional kinematic analysis

BACKGROUND

Shoulder bracing is very common in musculoskeletal rehabilitation.

OBJECTIVE

In this study, the positioning efficacy of shoulder support braces was investigated by analyzing their three-dimensional kinematic properties, as well as their perceived comfort was investigated with user ratings.

STUDY DESIGN

A randomized repeated-measures study.

METHODS

Seventeen asymptomatic participants were included. Scapular, humeral, and thoracic kinematics for all participants were measured using an electromagnetic tracking device in 6 experiments in randomized order: no brace, neutral brace, abduction brace, internal rotation brace, 15-degree external rotation brace (ER15-B), and 30-degree external rotation brace (ER30-B). Also, comfort ratings were obtained during each session.

RESULTS

Internal rotation brace achieved a mean of 29.34° of humerothoracic internal rotation while providing increased scapular internal rotation and upward rotation ( p < 0.05). Abduction brace achieved a mean of 45.39° of humerothoracic and 39.58° of glenohumeral elevation coupled with increased scapular upward rotation, posterior tilt, and humeral internal rotation ( p < 0.05). 30-Degree external rotation brace achieved a mean of 33.25° of glenohumeral external rotation and resulted in increased scapular external rotation, upward rotation, posterior tilt, and humeral external rotation ( p < 0.05). Abduction brace, internal rotation brace, ER15-B, and ER30-B moved the thoracic spine into a more axial rotation in the contralateral direction. Internal rotation brace, ER15-B, and ER30-B were rated more uncomfortable when compared with the no brace condition, with no significant differences observed among the braces.

CONCLUSIONS

The positioning efficacy was enhanced when an abduction pillow and external rotation wedge were applied. Selection of commercially available shoulder support braces should involve consideration of whether it can achieve the desired position and orientation as well as its comfort profile.

Sling Versus Abduction Brace Shoulder Immobilization After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background

The optimal immobilization position of the shoulder after rotator cuff repair is controversial.

Purpose

To compare the clinical outcomes and incidence of retears after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair between patients who used an abduction brace versus a sling for postoperative shoulder immobilization.

Study Design

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 1.

Methods

This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. We searched the PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase electronic databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared abduction brace and sling immobilization after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using single-row, double-row, or suture-bridge fixation. Clinical scores, pain severity, and retear rates were compared between patients with abduction brace versus sling immobilization.

Results

Of 1572 retrieved studies, 4 RCTs with a total of 224 patients (112 patients with abduction brace and 112 patients with sling) were included in the qualitative analysis, and 3 of the RCTs were included in the quantitative analysis (meta-analysis). There were no significant differences between the abduction brace and sling immobilization groups in the Constant-Murley score at 3 months (weighted mean difference [WMD], 0.26 [95% CI, -1.30 to 1.83]; P = .74; I 2 = 84%), 6 months (WMD, 1.91 [95% CI, -0.17 to 4.00]; P = .07; I 2 = 85%), and 12 months (WMD, 0.55 [95% CI, -1.37 to 2.47]; P = .57; I 2 = 0%); the visual analog scale score for pain at 1 week (WMD, 0.10 [95% CI, -0.20 to 0.41]; P = .51; I 2 = 0%), 3 weeks (WMD, -0.12 [95% CI, -0.34 to 1.00]; P = .29; I 2 = 0%), 6 weeks (WMD, -0.12 [95% CI, -0.30 to 0.06]; P = .20; I 2 = 0%), and 12 weeks (WMD, -0.13 [95% CI, -0.27 to 0.02]; P = .09; I 2 = 18%); or the retear rate at 3 months (risk ratio, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.09 to 4.23]; P = .64; Z = 0.47%) postoperatively.

Conclusion

Our systematic review demonstrated a lack of significant differences between the abduction brace and sling immobilization groups regarding postoperative clinical scores, pain severity, and tendon healing.

A Historical Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials in the Management of Pain in Rotator Cuff Tears

The aim of this analysis was to assess the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) relating to pain management in rotator cuff (RC) tears. This review evaluated the quality of the studies in the literature regarding this topic through the use of some factors and trends. The online databases used to search all RCTs on the topic of RC surgery were Medline, Scopus, CINAHL, EMBASE, and CENTRAL. This research was completed in September 2020. To assess the quality of reports, the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) and the modified Coleman methodology score (MCMS) were used. From the research, 262 articles emerged. Finally, 79 studies were included in this historical analysis. There were no statistically significant changes in MCMS across trials that included or did not include a CONSORT diagram (p = 0.10). A statistically significant difference in MCMS was discovered between papers produced prior to 2009 and publications produced after 2015 (p = 0.03). There was no association between the number of checklist items for each article and the Coleman score. During the years there has been a significant increase in both quantity and quality of RCTs relating to pain in RC tears.

Conservative versus accelerated rehabilitation after rotator cuff repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to compare the conservative and accelerated rehabilitation protocols in patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in terms of clinical outcomes and range of motions at 3, 6, 12, and 24-month follow-up.

Methods

According to PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review of the literature was performed. For each included article, the following data has been extracted: authors, year, study design, level of evidence, demographic characteristics, follow-up, clinical outcomes, range of motions, and retear events. A meta-analysis was performed to compare accelerated versus conservative rehabilitation protocols after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. The retear rate, postoperative Constant-Murley score and range of motions at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months of follow-up were the outcomes measured.

Results

The search strategy yielded 16 level I-II clinical studies. A total of 1424 patients, with 732 patients and 692 in the accelerated and conservative group, were included. The average age (mean ± standard deviation) was 56.1 ± 8.7 and 56.6 ± 9 in the accelerated and conservative group. The mean follow-up was 12.5 months, ranging from 2 to 24 months. The meta-analysis showed no statistically significant differences in terms of retear rate between the groups (P = 0.29). The superiority of the accelerated group was demonstrated in terms of external rotation (P < 0.05) at 3-month follow-up; in terms of forward elevation, external rotation, abduction (P < 0.05), but not in terms of Constant-Murley score at 6-month follow-up; in terms of forward elevation (P < 0.05) at 12-month follow-up. No significant differences between the two group were highlighted at 24-month follow-up.

Conclusions

No statistically significant differences in the retear rate among the accelerated and conservative group have been demonstrated. On the other hand, statistically and clinically significant differences were found in terms of external rotation at 3 and 6 months of follow-up in favour of the accelerated group. However, no differences between the two groups were detected at 24 months follow-up.

Postoperative Rehabilitation of Rotator Cuff Repair: A Systematic Review

Rotator cuff tears are the most common cause of shoulder disability and can cause significant pain and dysfunction. This systematic review summarizes the latest research on rehabilitation following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they pertained to postoperative rehabilitation following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and were published between 2003 and 2019 with a level of evidence of 1 or 2. Two blinded reviewers screened, graded, and extracted data from articles and recommendations on various aspects of rehabilitation were summarized. A total of 4067 articles were retrieved from the database search and 22 studies were included for data extraction. We noted similar outcomes between early and delayed mobilization following surgery. Reviewed articles support the use of supervised physical therapy, bracing in 15 degrees external rotation, and adjunctive transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for pain management. Early isometric loading improved outcomes in 1 study. Evidence is lacking for exercise prescription parameters and postoperative rehabilitation of the subscapularis.

Rotator Cuff Healing

The present article broadly addresses the aspects that interfere with the healing process of the rotator cuff. Life habits, such as smoking and alcoholism, are considered, systemic factors such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and obesity, as well as local factors, among which are those related to the pre, peri, and postoperative periods. From an extensive literature review, with the citation of 60 scientific articles from both Western and Eastern literature, the authors intend to deepen the theme by bringing to medical practice conducts based on new established concepts.

Does application of abduction brace after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair improve blood flow around posterosuperior rotator cuff and repair site, affecting pain levels and clinical and structural outcomes? A pilot randomized controlled trial

Background

As per some cadaveric studies, blood flow in posterosuperior rotator cuff tendons improves in the abducted shoulder position compared with the neutral position. In a clinical post–rotator cuff repair scenario, the impact of abduction on altered blood flow in and around the posterosuperior rotator cuff tendons is unknown in terms of clinical outcomes and structural healing.

Materials and methods

This study included 42 eligible patients aged between 40 and 70 years with clinically diagnosed and radiologically confirmed rotator cuff tears undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Patients were randomly allocated to undergo application of either an abduction brace (group 1) or an arm pouch (group 2). On postoperative day 1, power Doppler scanning was performed on the index shoulder in adduction and 30° of abduction in each patient; the allocated treatment (abduction brace or arm pouch) was then applied. Power Doppler scanning was repeated at 6 weeks in the immobilization position assigned to the patient (abduction or adduction). The vascular flow in 6 regions was noted as per the criteria of Fealy et al. A visual analog scale score was assessed preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 56 weeks postoperatively. Clinical assessment was performed with the Constant-Murley score at 1 year, and structural healing of the cuff was assessed using ultrasonography at 3 and 12 months.

Result

On the first postoperative day, blood flow was significantly higher in all 6 areas of the shoulder in group 1 than in group 2. The mean total vascular score was significantly higher in group 1 than in group 2 on postoperative day 1 (P = .0001) and remained so at 6 weeks (P = .0001). However, significantly higher vascular flow was noted only in the peribursal region at 6 weeks in group 1 (P = .04). No significant difference in the visual analog scale score was noted between the 2 groups at any given point of follow-up. Furthermore, no clinical and structural healing differences were noted between the 2 groups at final follow-up.

Conclusion

Higher blood flow in and around the posterosuperior rotator cuff owing to an abducted shoulder position with an abduction brace in the first 6 weeks postoperatively fails to offer any advantage in terms of lower pain levels, better clinical scores, or superior cuff healing.

A Historical Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials in Rotator Cuff Tears

Background and objectives: Our research aimed to evaluate the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) linked to rotator cuff (RC) tears. The present study analyzed factors connected to the quality of the RCTs and trends in the quality of reporting through time. Materials and Methods: The online databases used to search all RCTs on the topic of RC surgery completed until March 2020 were PubMed and Ovid (MEDLINE). The quality of reporting was evaluated using the modified Coleman methodology score (MCMS) and the consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT). Results: The online search found 957 articles. Finally, 183 studies were included in the quantitative synthesis. A total of 97 (53%) of 183 studies had a level of evidence I and 86 (47%) of 183 studies had a level of evidence II, according to the Oxford Center of Evidence Based Medicine (EBM). A statistically significant difference in MCMS between articles written before 2010 and articles written after 2010 was found. Articles written after 2010 had, on average, the highest Coleman score. The average number of CONSORT checklist items for each article across all analyzed RCTs was 21.67. The 37 studies completed up to 2010 averaged a number of checklist items of 19.97 and the studies completed between 2011 and 2019 averaged a number of checklist items of 22.10. A statistically significant difference in the number of checklist items between articles written before 2010 and articles written after 2010 was found. Articles written after 2010 had on average more checklist items. However, low correlation (0.26) between the number of checklist items for each article and the respective Coleman score was found. On the other hand, articles with the CONSORT diagram had a significantly high Coleman score. Conclusions: An improvement in the quantity and quality of RCTs relating to RC surgery over the analyzed period was found.

Conservative Rehabilitation Provides Superior Clinical Results Compared to Early Aggressive Rehabilitation for Rotator Cuff Repair: A Retrospective Comparative Study

Background and objectives: To compare the long term clinical outcomes, range of motion (ROM) and strength of two different postoperative rehabilitation protocols after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) for full-thickness rotator cuff (RC) tears. Materials and Methods: Patients undergoing RCR were divided into two groups. In 51 patients (56 shoulders), rehabilitation was performed without passive external rotation, anterior elevation ROM, and active pendulum exercises in the first 2 weeks after surgery (Group A). In 49 patients (50 shoulders) aggressive rehabilitation was implemented, with early free passive external rotation, anterior elevation ROM, and active pendulum exercises were allowed from the day after surgery (Group A). Results: No statistically significant differences were found in clinical scores, muscle strength, passive forward flexion, passive and active internal/external rotation between the two groups. However, the mean active forward flexion was 167.3° ± 26° (range 90–180°) in group A and 156.5° ± 30.5° (range 90–180°) in group B (p = 0.04). Conclusions: A statistically significant difference between the 2 groups was found in active forward flexion ROM, which was better in patients of group A.

Editorial Commentary: Optimizing Postoperative Care After Rotator Cuff Repair: What Do We Know and Understand?

Optimization of the management of rotator cuff tears is still needed. Preoperative patient selection, perioperative surgical techniques, and postoperative care are all important topics that are studied extensively. This commentary will examine the current situation and important fields of interest for future research. Postoperative pain management is scrutinized in relation to the level of abduction using an abduction brace.

Does The Type of Shoulder Brace Affect Postoperative Pain and Clinical Outcome After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair?

PURPOSE

To compare postoperative pain and clinical outcome after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in patients immobilized with an abduction brace versus patients placed in an antirotation brace.

METHODS

One hundred twenty patients (72 women and 48 men) with symptomatic degenerative complete tear of the supraspinatus or infraspinatus tendons were included in the study. Exclusion criteria were history of trauma/traumatic tears, concomitant shoulder pathology, psychological illnesses, and previous shoulder surgery. The Constant-Murley score (CMS) was obtained before surgery and at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery. The visual analogue scale (VAS) was done on the day of surgery and at 1 week, 3 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months after surgery. Postoperative isokinetic muscle strength evaluation was done for the shoulder external rotator at 1 year.

RESULTS

Mean age was 50.4 years for the abduction brace group (ABG) and 50.8 years for the open pouch arm sling group (PASG). The mean level of the VAS score ranged from 75.6 for the ABG and 74.9 for the PASG on the day of the operation to 17.7 and 18.5 at 3 months after surgery. In both groups, the repeated measure analysis of variance showed that there were highly significant changes (P < .001) in the VAS from the day of operation to 3 months after surgery. A significant improvement was detected in both groups in the mean level of the CMS, from 40.9 for the ABG and 41.2 for the PASG before surgery to 84.7 and 84.5 at 1 year after the operation. There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups regarding the isokinetic muscle strength, VAS, or the CMS.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study did not find a significant difference between abduction brace and antirotation sling in patient-oriented outcome measures or postoperative pain after rotator cuff repair.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, prospective comparative study.

The position of sling immobilization influences the outcomes of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: a randomized, single-blind, prospective study

BACKGROUND

To date, no studies have been published that have assessed the optimal position of sling immobilization after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty for glenohumeral osteoarthritis.

METHODS

Thirty-six patients undergoing anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty for osteoarthritis were randomized to a neutral rotation sling versus an internal rotation sling. The primary outcomes assessed included the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score; Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder score; Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score; visual analog scale (VAS) scores for pain and satisfaction; compliance ratings; and radiographic and range-of-motion measurements. Primary outcomes were assessed at baseline and postoperatively at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year.

RESULTS

All patient-determined outcome scores for both groups revealed statistically significant improvements (P < .0001) from enrollment to final follow-up. There were statistically significant advantages to the neutral rotation sling group compared with the internal rotation sling group when we evaluated the improvements in (1) active external rotation (42° vs 25°, P = .03), (2) passive external rotation (44° vs 26°, P = .02), (3) passive horizontal adduction (7.7 cm vs 3.7 cm, P = .05), and (4) pain relief with passive adduction (VAS score, 6.2 cm vs 3.5 cm; P = .002). There was a trend toward greater improvements in the neutral rotation sling group when we measured (1) active horizontal adduction (8.3 cm vs 2.9 cm, P = .06) and (2) active internal rotation behind the back (18 cm vs 11.1 cm, P = .09). At 2 weeks, the neutral rotation sling group had significantly less night pain than the internal rotation sling group (mean VAS score, 18 mm vs 34 mm; P = .047).

CONCLUSIONS

Neutral rotation sling use after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty resulted in statistically significant improvements in external rotation and adduction, as well as decreased night pain, compared with an internal rotation sling.

No Functional Difference Between Three and Six Weeks of Immobilization After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Non-Inferiority Trial

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to compare clinical and radiologic results among patients with 3 versus 6 weeks of immobilization after arthroscopic rotator cuff (RC) repair in a prospective randomized controlled non-inferiority trial.

METHODS

One hundred twenty patients were included after RC surgery for a small- to medium-sized tear of supraspinatus and upper infraspinatus tendons. Group A was immobilized in a simple sling for 3 weeks, and group B had a brace with a small abduction pillow with the arm in neutral position for 6 weeks. All patients started active range of motion when they removed the sling/brace. One hundred eighteen (98%) patients were assessed at 1-year follow-up. They underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the shoulder, filled out the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC) index, and were evaluated with a Constant Murley (CM) score.

RESULTS

Statistical non-inferiority was demonstrated for the 2 groups on the basis of the WORC index, the primary endpoint at 1 year. The objective for the non-inferiority test was to determine whether the expected mean WORC index for group A was at most 13% worse than standard treatment (Group B). The WORC index at 1 year was similar in both groups, with mean percent scores of 83% in group A and 87% in group B (mean difference = -4; 95% one-sided CI -9, -4). Age-adjusted CM scores were also similar, with means of 86 in group A and 90 in group B (mean difference = -4; 95% CI -13, 5; P = .37). MRI after 1 year showed 50 (89%) patients in each group with healed RC repair. Four patients in group A had complications: 1 acute postoperative infection, 2 cases of postoperative capsulitis treated with corticosteroid injections, and 1 repeat operation because of a loose anchor and subacromial pain. No patients in group B had complications.

CONCLUSION

RC repair resulted in improved postoperative shoulder function, regardless of whether the shoulder was immobilized for 3 or 6 weeks. Three weeks of postoperative immobilization with sling use was non-inferior to the commonly used regimen involving 6 weeks of immobilization in a brace with regard to the WORC index at 12 months' follow-up. MRI indicated similar degrees of healing between the groups. Based on these findings, it is safe to immobilize patients in a simple sling for 3 to 6 weeks after repair of small to medium RC tears.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, high-quality randomized controlled trial with statistically significant differences.

Editorial Commentary: Better Care, Better Health, Better Cost: Is Scientific Evidence Negatively Impacting the Transformation of Health Care?

The selection of an immobilization device and arm positioning may play a role in postoperative pain and healing after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Although the current evidence is inconclusive, it is important that we aim as a profession to produce meaningful evidence that will advance the care of our patients while controlling health care costs.

Abduction Brace Versus Antirotation Sling After Arthroscopic Cuff Repair: The Effects on Pain and Function

PURPOSE

To study the effects on pain as the main outcome parameter and on function and cuff integrity as the secondary outcome parameters after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in the short term comparing the abduction brace with an antirotation sling for postoperative shoulder immobilization.

METHODS

Eligible patients were between the ages of 18 and 75 years who were diagnosed with a traumatic or degenerative tear of the supraspinatus and/or infraspinatus tendon, confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging, for which an arthroscopic footprint repair was indicated and performed. Patients were randomly allocated to the antirotation sling or abduction brace group. Postoperative pain and use of analgesics were accurately registered up to 3 months after surgery using a patient diary. Follow-up examinations including the Constant-Murley score, Western Ontario Rotator Cuff index, and glenohumeral range of motion were scheduled 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months, and 1 year after surgery.

RESULTS

The average level of pain measured directly postoperation up to 1 year after surgery was not significant different between groups. Postoperatively, function scores and glenohumeral range of motion improved significantly for both groups; however, no differences were observed between groups. No retears were observed on ultrasonograph 3 months after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

In the short term, the level of pain, function, and quality of life were not significantly different between the use of an abduction brace and that of an antirotation sling after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Based on these findings, the abduction brace used in this study does not seem to be the solution for decreasing the pain experienced in the first postoperative weeks after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, and both are recommendable.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, randomized controlled trial.

Deltoid muscle tropism does not influence the outcome of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

BACKGROUND

Several different factors have been identified as causes of failure of rotator cuff (RC) repair. However, no studies focused on the role of the deltoid muscle. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of the deltoid tropism in the outcomes of arthroscopic RC repair procedures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Nine male (45 %) and 11 female (55 %) patients who underwent arthroscopic RC repair were included in the study. The mean age was 63.5 ± 8.1 years (range 50-74 years), and the follow-up averaged 1.9 ± 1.3 years (range 1-5 years) after surgery. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the modified University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder rating scale, Wolfgang criteria shoulder score and Oxford shoulder score (OSS). Functional outcomes were evaluated considering active and passive range of motion of the shoulder and muscle strength. The deltoid tropism was measured pre-operatively and post-operatively using T2-weighted transverse MRI images.

RESULTS

No statistically significant correlation was found between the thickness of each portion of the deltoid muscle (vD, lD and dD) and the UCLA shoulder rating scale, Wolfgang shoulder score and OSS. At the same time, no statistically significant relationship was detected between the thickness of each portion of the deltoid muscle (vD, lD and dD) and the functional outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The deltoid tropism does not influence the results of arthroscopic RC repair. Early RC repair may prevent the reduction in the tropism of the deltoid muscle. Nevertheless, further prospective randomized studies with larger samples are necessary to clarify the role of deltoid tropism in the outcomes of arthroscopic RC repair procedures.