One-tissue compartment model for myocardial perfusion quantification with N-13 ammonia PET provides matching results: A cross-comparison between Carimas, FlowQuant, and PMOD

Measuring myocardial blood flow using dynamic myocardial perfusion SPECT: artifacts and pitfalls

Dynamic acquisition allows absolute quantification of myocardial perfusion and flow reserve, offering an alternative to overcome the potential limits of relative quantification, especially in patients with balanced multivessel coronary artery disease. SPECT myocardial perfusion is widely available, at lower cost than PET. Dynamic cardiac SPECT is now feasible and has the potential to be the next step of comprehensive perfusion imaging. In order to help nuclear cardiologists potentially interested in using dynamic perfusion SPECT, we sought to review the different steps of acquisition, processing, and reporting of dynamic SPECT studies in order to enlighten the potentially critical pitfalls and artifacts. Both patient-related and technical artifacts are discussed. Key parameters of the acquisition include pharmacological stress, radiopharmaceuticals, and injection device. When it comes to image processing, attention must be paid to image-derived input function, patient motion, and extra-cardiac activity. This review also mentions compartment models, cameras, and attenuation correction. Finally, published data enlighten some facets of dynamic cardiac SPECT while several issues remain. Harmonizing acquisition and quality control procedures will likely improve its performance and clinical strength.

The assessment of left ventricular volume and function in gated small animal 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging: a comparative study of three commercially available software tools

BACKGROUND

Several software tools have been developed for gated PET imaging that use distinct algorithms to analyze tracer uptake, myocardial perfusion, and left ventricle volumes and function. Studies suggest that different software tools cannot be used interchangeably in humans. In this study, we sought to compare the left ventricular parameters in gated 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging in mice by three commercially available software tools: PMOD, MIM, and QGS.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Healthy mice underwent ECG-gated 18F-FDG imaging using a small-animal nanoPET/CT (Mediso) under isoflurane narcosis. Reconstructed gates PET images were subsequently analyzed in three different software tools, and cardiac volume and function (end-diastolic (EDV), end-systolic volumes (ESV), stroke volume (SV), and ejection fraction (EF)) were evaluated. While cardiac volumes correlated well between PMOD, MIM, and QGS, the left ventricular parameters and cardiac function differed in agreement using Bland-Altman analysis. EDV in PMOD vs. QGS: r = 0.85; p < 0.001, MIM vs. QGS: r = 0.92; p < 0.001, and MIM vs. PMOD: r = 0.88; p < 0.001, showed good correlations. Correlation was also found in ESV: PMOD vs. QGS: r = 0.48; p = 0.07, MIM vs QGS: r = 0.79; p < 0.001, and MIM vs. PMOD: r = 0.69; p < 0.01. SV showed good correlations in: PMOD vs. QGS: r = 0.73; p < 0.01, MIM vs. QGS: r = 0.86; p < 0.001, and MIM vs. PMOD: r = 0.92; p < 0.001. However, EF among correlated poorly: PMOD vs. QGS: r = -0.31; p = 0.26, MIM vs. QGS: r = 0.48; p = 0.07, and MIM vs. PMOD: r = 0.23; p = 0.41. Inter-class and intra-class correlation coefficient were > 0.9 underlining repeatability in using PMOD, MIM, and QGS for cardiac volume and function assessment.

CONCLUSIONS

All three commercially available software tools are feasible in small animal cardiac volume assessment in gated 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging. However, due to software-related differences in agreement analysis for cardiac volumes and function, PMOD, MIM, and QGS cannot be used interchangeably in murine research.

Myocardial perfusion quantification with Rb-82 PET: good interobserver agreement of Carimas software on global, regional, and segmental levels

Purpose

To estimate the interobserver agreement of the Carimas software package (SP) on global, regional, and segmental levels for the most widely used myocardial perfusion PET tracer—Rb-82.

Materials and methods

Rest and stress Rb-82 PET scans of 48 patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease (CAD) were analyzed in four centers using the Carimas SP.

We considered values to agree if they simultaneously had an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) > 0.75 and a difference < 20% of the median across all observers.

Results

The median values on the segmental level were 1.08 mL/min/g for rest myocardial blood flow (MBF), 2.24 mL/min/g for stress MBF, and 2.17 for myocardial flow reserve (MFR). For the rest MBF and MFR, all the values at all the levels fulfilled were in excellent agreement. For stress MBF, at the global and regional levels, all the 24 comparisons showed excellent agreement. Only 1 out of 102 segmental comparisons (seg. 14) was over the adequate agreement limit—23.5% of the median value (ICC = 0.95).

Conclusion

Interobserver agreement for Rb-82 PET myocardial perfusion quantification analyzed with Carimas is good at any LV segmentation level—global, regional, and segmental. It is good for all the estimates—rest MBF, stress MBF, and MFR.