Coronary vasomotor dysfunction portends worse outcomes in patients with breast cancer

Expert Panel on Cardiac Imaging, Meyersohn NM, Parakh A, Ghoshhajra BB, Agarwal PP, Bourque JM, Chamarthy MRK, De Cecco CN, Ehrhardt M, Fuss C, Kallianos K, Lopez-Mattei JC, Malik SB, Manisty C, Maroules CD, Ray A, Scherrer-Crosbie M, Small W, Tailor TD, Koweek LM. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Assessment of Cardiac Function and Baseline Cardiac Risk Stratification in Oncology Patients

Cardiac risk stratification is clinically useful prior to initiation of oncologic therapy in asymptomatic patients in order to guide treatment decisions and allow for initiation of cardioprotective therapy or modification of treatment regimens. Once oncology treatment is underway, patients may develop cardiac symptoms. In this setting, imaging can be used for assessment of ventricular and valvular function, myocardial characterization, pericardial effusion or constriction, as well as to evaluate for ischemia as a cause of symptoms. Results can help guide treatment choices and shared decision-making regarding modification or cessation of treatments with associated cardiotoxicity. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

How to Use Imaging: Complex Cases of Atherosclerosis, Myocardial Inflammation, and Cardiomyopathy in Cardio-Oncology

It is well understood that cancer therapies including chemotherapy, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and radiation can increase the risk of cardiovascular disease in patients with cancer. This can manifest as a multitude of pathologies including left ventricular dysfunction, myocarditis, cardiomyopathy, accelerated atherosclerosis, and coronary vasospasm. Multimodal cardiac imaging plays a critical role in diagnosing such pathologies by relying on noninvasive tools including echocardiograms, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography, single-photon emission computed tomography, and coronary computed tomography angiography. These methods have unique considerations and in recent years have made significant progress in their diagnostic capabilities in this patient population. As the field of cardio-oncology continues to expand rapidly, guidance on the management of such toxicities and the development of imaging technologies is crucial. In this review, we present 2 complex cases of atherosclerosis and myocarditis in patients with cancer, highlighting our rationale for management and discussing the nuances of various cardiac imaging modalities.

Coronary microvascular dysfunction and cancer therapy-related cardiovascular toxicity

BACKGROUND

Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) has been implicated as a potential mechanism in the pathophysiology of different clinical presentations, including ischemia and no obstructive coronary artery disease (INOCA), myocardial infarction and nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA), stress cardiomyopathy, heart failure, and myocarditis. There are limited data about the role of CMD in cancer therapy-related cardiovascular toxicities.

CASE PRESENTATIONS

Four women with a diagnosis of active cancer receiving treatment who developed subsequent MINOCA or INOCA presented for cardiac catheterization. Upon coronary angiography showing no obstructive coronary arteries, coronary function testing was performed to evaluate for CMD.

METHODS

Coronary physiology was assessed measuring non-hyperemic (resting full-cycle ratio [RFR]) and hyperemic (fractional flow reserve [FFR]) indices using a physiologic pressure wire. The wire also measured coronary flow reserve (CFR), index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR), and RFR using thermodilution technology. CMD was confirmed if the CFR was <2.5 and the IMR was >25.

RESULTS

Among 4 patients with diagnosis of active cancer presenting with chest pain, there was no evidence of obstructive coronary artery disease, leading to separate diagnoses of INOCA, MINOCA, stress cardiomyopathy, and myocarditis. We found CMD in 2 patients (1 with INOCA and 1 with immune checkpoint inhibitor-related myocarditis).

CONCLUSIONS

CMD may play a role in cardiovascular toxicities. Further coronary physiology studies are needed to understand the mechanisms of cancer therapy-related cardiovascular toxicity and CMD, as well as optimal preventive and treatment options.

Potential utility of myocardial blood flow quantification with single photon emission computed tomography in a patient undergoing treatment for breast cancer

Diagnosis and management of cardiac complications of cancer treatment can be challenging. Few PET data suggest a potential role of dynamic perfusion imaging with measurements of absolute myocardial blood flow and flow reserve (MFR). We report the case of a 72-year-old woman with a history of bilateral breast cancer who underwent dynamic cardiac scintigraphy. Relative perfusion analysis was normal, whereas MFR was impaired in all territories suggesting diffuse microvascular dysfunction. Flow parameters derived from dynamic cardiac scintigraphy could thus be an interesting tool in cardio-oncology.

Feasibility of Simultaneous Quantification of Myocardial and Renal Perfusion With Cardiac Positron Emission Tomography

BACKGROUND

Given the central importance of cardiorenal interactions, mechanistic tools for evaluating cardiorenal physiology are needed. In the heart and kidneys, shared pathways of neurohormonal activation, hypertension, and vascular and interstitial fibrosis implicate the relevance of systemic vascular health. The availability of a long axial field of view positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) system enables simultaneous evaluation of cardiac and renal blood flow.

METHODS

This study evaluated the feasibility of quantification of renal blood flow using data acquired during routine, clinically indicated 13N-ammonia myocardial perfusion PET/CT. Dynamic PET image data were used to calculate renal blood flow. Reproducibility was assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient among 3 independent readers. PET-derived renal blood flow was correlated with imaging and clinical parameters in the overall cohort and with histopathology in a small companion study of patients with a native kidney biopsy.

RESULTS

Among 386 consecutive patients with myocardial perfusion PET/CT, 296 (76.7%) had evaluable images to quantify renal perfusion. PET quantification of renal blood flow was highly reproducible (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.98 [95% CI, 0.93-0.99]) and was correlated with the estimated glomerular filtration rate (r=0.64; P<0.001). Compared across vascular beds, resting renal blood flow was correlated with maximal stress myocardial blood flow and myocardial flow reserve (stress/rest myocardial blood flow), an integrated marker of endothelial health. In patients with kidney biopsy (n=12), resting PET renal blood flow was strongly negatively correlated with histological interstitial fibrosis (r=-0.85; P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Renal blood flow can be reliably measured from cardiac 13N-ammonia PET/CT and allows for simultaneous assessment of myocardial and renal perfusion, opening a potential novel avenue to interrogate the mechanisms of emerging therapies with overlapping cardiac and renal benefits.

Tales from the future-nuclear cardio-oncology, from prediction to diagnosis and monitoring

Cancer and cardiovascular diseases (CVD) often share common risk factors, and patients with CVD who develop cancer are at high risk of experiencing major adverse cardiovascular events. Additionally, cancer treatment can induce short- and long-term adverse cardiovascular events. Given the improvement in oncological patients' prognosis, the burden in this vulnerable population is slowly shifting towards increased cardiovascular mortality. Consequently, the field of cardio-oncology is steadily expanding, prompting the need for new markers to stratify and monitor the cardiovascular risk in oncological patients before, during, and after the completion of treatment. Advanced non-invasive cardiac imaging has raised great interest in the early detection of CVD and cardiotoxicity in oncological patients. Nuclear medicine has long been a pivotal exam to robustly assess and monitor the cardiac function of patients undergoing potentially cardiotoxic chemotherapies. In addition, recent radiotracers have shown great interest in the early detection of cancer-treatment-related cardiotoxicity. In this review, we summarize the current and emerging nuclear cardiology tools that can help identify cardiotoxicity and assess the cardiovascular risk in patients undergoing cancer treatments and discuss the specific role of nuclear cardiology alongside other non-invasive imaging techniques.

Review of cardiovascular imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 2022: positron emission tomography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance

In 2022, the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology® published many excellent original research articles and editorials focusing on imaging in patients with cardiovascular disease. In this review of 2022, we summarize a selection of articles to provide a concise recap of major advancements in the field. In the first part of this 2-part series, we addressed publications pertaining to single-photon emission computed tomography. In this second part, we focus on positron emission tomography, cardiac computed tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance. We specifically review advances in imaging of non-ischemic cardiomyopathy, cardio-oncology, infectious disease cardiac manifestations, atrial fibrillation, detection and prognostication of atherosclerosis, and technical improvements in the field. We hope that this review will be useful to readers as a reminder to articles they have seen during the year as well as ones they have missed.

Long-Term Prognostic Value of 82Rb PET/CT-Determined Myocardial Perfusion and Flow Reserve in Cancer Patients

Myocardial flow reserve (MFR), derived from quantitative measurements of myocardial blood flow during PET imaging, provides prognostic information on patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), but it is not known if this also applies to cancer patients with a competing risk for mortality. Methods: To determine the prognostic value of MFR in patients with cancer, we designed a retrospective cohort study comprising 221 patients with known or suspected CAD (median age, 71 y; range, 41-92 y) enrolled between June 2009 and January 2011. Most patients were referred for perioperative risk assessment. Patients underwent measurement of myocardial blood flow at rest and during pharmacologic stress, using quantitative 82Rb PET imaging. They were divided into early-stage versus advanced-stage cancer groups based on cancer histopathology and clinical state and were further stratified by myocardial perfusion summed stress score, summed difference score, and calculated MFR. Overall survival (OS) was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier estimator, and Cox proportional-hazards regression helped identify independent predictors for OS. Results: During a follow-up of 85.6 mo, 120 deaths occurred. MFR, summed difference score, and cancer stage were significantly associated with OS. In the age-adjusted Cox hazard multivariable analysis, MFR and cancer stage remained independent prognostic factors. MFR combined with cancer stage enhanced OS discrimination. The groups had significantly different outcomes (P < 0.001), with 5-y OS of 88% (MFR ≥ 1.97 and early-stage), 53% (MFR < 1.97 and early-stage), 33% (MFR ≥ 1.97 and advanced-stage), and 13% (MFR < 1.97 and advanced-stage). Conclusion: Independent of cancer stage, MFR derived from quantitative PET was prognostic of OS in our cohort of cancer patients with known or suspected CAD. Combining these 2 parameters enhanced discrimination of OS, suggesting that MFR improves risk stratification and may serve as a treatment target to increase survival in cancer patients.

Endothelial dysfunction as a complication of anti-cancer therapy

Recent strides in anti-cancer therapeutics have improved longevity and led to a growing population of cancer survivors, who are increasingly likely to die of other causes. Treatment-induced cardiotoxicity is a complication of several therapeutic agents with acute and long-term consequences for cancer patients. Vascular endothelial dysfunction is a precursor and hallmark of ischemic coronary disease and may play a role in anti-cancer therapy-induced cardiotoxicity. This review summarizes clinical evidence for endothelial dysfunction following anti-cancer therapy and extends the discussion to include the impact of therapeutic agents on conduit arteries and the microcirculation. We highlight the role of innate immune system activation and cross-talk between inflammation and oxidative stress as pathogenic mechanisms underlying anti-cancer therapy-induced vascular toxicity. Understanding the impact of anti-cancer agents on the vascular endothelium will inform therapeutic approaches to prevent or reverse treatment-induced cardiotoxicity and may serve as an important tool to predict, monitor, and prevent adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients undergoing treatment.