1
|
Daley AJ, Griffin RA, Sanders JP, Gokal K, Ives N, Skrybant M, Parretti HM, Edwardson CL, Biddle SJH, Jolly K, Greaves CJ, Greenfield SM, Maddison R, Esliger DW, Sherar LB, Frew E, Mutrie N, Maylor B, Yates T, Tearne S, Moakes CA. Snacktivity™ to Promote Physical Activity in Primary Care, Community Health and Public Health Settings: A Feasibility Randomised Controlled Trial. Int J Behav Med 2025:10.1007/s12529-025-10352-3. [PMID: 39994142 DOI: 10.1007/s12529-025-10352-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/27/2025] [Indexed: 02/26/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A novel 'whole day' approach that could motivate the public to be more physically active is Snacktivity™. The Snacktivity™ approach encourages individuals to accumulate 150 min of physical activity in short 2-5-min 'snacks' of moderate-vigorous intensity physical activity (MVPA) throughout the day/week. METHOD A randomised controlled trial to assess the feasibility/acceptability of a Snacktivity™ intervention and trial processes was conducted. The trial aimed to recruit 80 physically inactive adults from healthcare services and via social media. Participants were randomised to the Snacktivity™ intervention or usual care and followed up at 12 weeks. The intervention was predominately delivered by health professionals within consultations. Assessment of whether the Snacktivity™ intervention and trial methods were acceptable to participants, adherence to Snacktivity™ (assessed by Fitbit) and physical activity (assessed by accelerometer), and retention were considered according to traffic light stop-go progression criteria (green-amber-red). RESULTS Seventy-two participants (n = 37 Snacktivity™ intervention; n = 35 usual care) were recruited across 14 months (72/80, 90%, (green) 95% CI: 83% to 97%). Snacktivity™ adherence was achieved in 12/37 participants (32%, (red) 95% CI: 17% to 48%). Physical activity adherence was achieved in 17/37 participants (46%, (amber) 95% CI: 30% to 62%). Seven participants (10%, (green) 95% CI: 3% to 17%) withdrew from follow-up and 25/72 (35%, (amber) 95% CI: 24% to 46%) had no accelerometer data at follow-up (retention). CONCLUSION The Snacktivity™ intervention may be feasible and acceptable to implement. Findings can inform subsequent research that seeks to investigate whether Snacktivity™ based approaches are effective in promoting physical activity in the population. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN: 64851242. Registration date: 31/01/21.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda J Daley
- Centre for Lifestyle Medicine and Behaviour, School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK.
| | - Ryan A Griffin
- Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - James P Sanders
- Centre for Lifestyle Medicine and Behaviour, School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK
| | - Kajal Gokal
- Centre for Lifestyle Medicine and Behaviour, School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK
| | - Natalie Ives
- Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Magdalena Skrybant
- Department of Applied Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Helen M Parretti
- Norwich Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Charlotte L Edwardson
- University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester and NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Leicester, UK
| | - Stuart J H Biddle
- University of Southern Queensland, Springfield, Australia
- Faculty of Sport & Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland
| | - Kate Jolly
- Department of Applied Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Colin J Greaves
- School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Sheila M Greenfield
- Department of Applied Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Ralph Maddison
- Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Dale W Esliger
- School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK
- NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Leicester, UK
| | - Lauren B Sherar
- School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK
| | - Emma Frew
- Health Economics Unit, Department of Applied Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Nanette Mutrie
- Physical Activity for Health Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Ben Maylor
- University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester and NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Leicester, UK
| | - Tom Yates
- University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester and NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Leicester, UK
| | - Sarah Tearne
- Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Catherine A Moakes
- Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Brown NI, Henderson J, Stern M, Carson TL. Health-Related Benefits and Adherence for Multiple Short Bouts of Aerobic Physical Activity Among Adults. Am J Lifestyle Med 2025; 19:58-72. [PMID: 39554919 PMCID: PMC11562445 DOI: 10.1177/15598276241253160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Most adults do not adhere to established aerobic physical activity (PA) guidelines due in part to various barriers. PA snacks, or periodic short bouts of activity (<10 minutes) offer a potential strategy to overcoming such barriers and increasing PA. Previous efforts have been focused on eliciting the health benefits of PA and exercise snacks, yet adherence to this concept has not been examined. The purpose of this review is to summarize the current literature assessing adherence to PA snacks and health-related outcomes associated with PA snacks. PubMed, CINAHL, and SPORTDiscus were searched for literature published between January 2018-September 2023. Studies investigating adherence and/or the health-related outcomes of PA snacks were included. Of 4201 articles identified, 12 studies were included in the review. Most of the studies were randomized (n = 10), focused on adults with a chronic disease/life-long condition or exhibited a sedentary lifestyle (n = 8), and reported positive health outcomes (n = 12; e.g., improvements in cardiometabolic markers and body composition). Five studies reported adherence to supervised and unsupervised PA snack interventions, with high rates ≥92%. This review supports and extends the previously reported health-related benefits of PA snacks. It also shows promise for increasing overall PA and adherence to the PA guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nashira I. Brown
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA (NIB, JH, TLC)
| | - Jazmin Henderson
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA (NIB, JH, TLC)
| | - Marilyn Stern
- Department of Child and Family Studies, College of Behavioral and Community Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA (MS)
| | - Tiffany L. Carson
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA (NIB, JH, TLC)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Krouwel M, Greenfield S, Sanders JP, Gokal K, Chalkley A, Griffin RA, Parretti H, Jolly K, Skrybant M, Biddle S, Greaves C, Esliger DW, Sherar LB, Edwardson C, Yates T, Maddison R, Frew E, Mutrie N, Ives N, Tearne S, Daley AJ. Making Every Contact Count: health professionals' experiences of integrating conversations about Snacktivity to promote physical activity within routine consultations - a qualitative study. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e085233. [PMID: 39438094 PMCID: PMC11499785 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2024] [Accepted: 08/29/2024] [Indexed: 10/25/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Helping people to change their health behaviours is becoming a greater feature within the role of health professionals, including through whole system initiatives such as Making Every Contact Count. Health services provide an ideal setting to routinely promote health behaviours, including physical activity. Snacktivity is a novel approach that promotes small bouts of physical activity (activity snacks) throughout the day. This study explored health professionals' initial experiences of delivering a Snacktivity intervention to promote physical activity within routine health consultations. A further aim was to investigate health professionals' ability/fidelity in delivering the Snacktivity intervention to their patients. DESIGN Semistructured interviews (n=11) and audio recording of consultations (n=46). SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS Healthcare professionals from a variety of specialisms who delivered the Snacktivity intervention within patient consultations. RESULTS Analyses revealed two higher-level themes of interest: (1) health professionals' conceptualisation of Snacktivity (subthemes: observations/reflections about patients' understanding, engagement and enthusiasm for delivering the Snacktivity intervention) and (2) health professionals' understanding of Snacktivity and experience in delivering the intervention (subthemes: delivering Snacktivity; limitations, challenges and possible improvements). Consultation audio recordings demonstrated health professionals delivered the Snacktivity intervention with high levels of fidelity. Health professionals were proficient and supportive of delivering the Snacktivity intervention within consultations although practical barriers to implementation such as time constraints were raised, and confidence in doing so was mixed. CONCLUSIONS Health professionals were proficient and supportive of delivering the Snacktivity intervention within consultations. The primary barrier to implementation was the time to deliver it, however, gaining greater experience in the intervention and improving behaviour change counselling skills may reduce this barrier. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN64851242.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Krouwel
- Centre for Lifestyle Medicine and Behaviour, School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK
| | - Sheila Greenfield
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - James P Sanders
- Centre for Lifestyle Medicine and Behaviour, School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK
| | - Kajal Gokal
- Centre for Lifestyle Medicine and Behaviour, School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK
| | - Anna Chalkley
- Faculty of Life Sciences and Health Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK
- Centre for Applied Education Research, Wolfson Centre for Applied Health Research, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford, UK
| | | | - Helen Parretti
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Kate Jolly
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Magdalena Skrybant
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Stuart Biddle
- University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia
| | - Colin Greaves
- School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Dale W Esliger
- School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK
| | - Lauren B Sherar
- School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK
| | - Charlotte Edwardson
- Diabetes Research Centre, College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester and NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Leicester, UK
| | - Thomas Yates
- Diabetes Research Centre, College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester and NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Leicester, UK
| | - Ralph Maddison
- Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Melbourne, UK
| | - Emma Frew
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Nanette Mutrie
- Physical Activity for Health Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | | | - Amanda J Daley
- Centre for Lifestyle Medicine and Behaviour, School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pang B, Moullin JC, Thompson C, Thøgersen-Ntoumani C, Stamatakis E, McVeigh JA. Barriers and Facilitators to Participation in Vigorous Lifestyle Physical Activity in Adults Aged 55-75 Years: A Scoping Review. J Aging Phys Act 2024; 32:446-459. [PMID: 38237573 DOI: 10.1123/japa.2022-0405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2022] [Revised: 06/29/2023] [Accepted: 10/03/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2024]
Abstract
Despite the well-known benefits of physical activity, less than half of adults aged 55-75 years participate in sufficient physical activity. Short bouts of vigorous intermittent lifestyle physical activity (VILPA) accumulated throughout the day can contribute toward the recommended volume of physical activity. A rich characterization of the barriers and facilitators to participation in VILPA is needed to develop targeted interventions. This scoping review aimed to identify barriers and facilitators to participation in different components of VILPA in adults aged 55-75 years, and to map barriers and facilitators to the Theoretical Domains Framework. Within the 18 eligible studies, the most prevalent barriers were related to a person's skills, environmental context, and social influences. Most facilitators were related to a person's goals, social influences, and environmental context. Interventions to promote VILPA should test the effectiveness of behavioral change measures related to the unique barriers and facilitators in this age group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Joanna C Moullin
- Curtin University, Bentley, WA, Australia
- enAble Institute, Curtin University, Bentley, WA, Australia
| | - Craig Thompson
- Curtin University, Bentley, WA, Australia
- enAble Institute, Curtin University, Bentley, WA, Australia
| | | | | | - Joanne A McVeigh
- Curtin University, Bentley, WA, Australia
- enAble Institute, Curtin University, Bentley, WA, Australia
- Movement Physiology Laboratory, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Jones MD, Clifford BK, Stamatakis E, Gibbs MT. Exercise Snacks and Other Forms of Intermittent Physical Activity for Improving Health in Adults and Older Adults: A Scoping Review of Epidemiological, Experimental and Qualitative Studies. Sports Med 2024; 54:813-835. [PMID: 38190022 DOI: 10.1007/s40279-023-01983-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024]
Abstract
Exercise snacks, including other variants of brief intermittent bouts, are an emerging approach for increasing physical activity, although their operationalisation is unstandardised and their health benefits remain unclear. This scoping review aimed to explore characterisations of exercise snacks and summarise their effects on health in adults and older adults. Clinical trial registers (clinicaltrials.gov and ANZCTR) and electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL, CENTRAL, PsycINFO) were searched from inception to 1 June 2023, for ongoing and published studies of exercise snacks. Backwards and forwards citation tracking was also conducted to identify additional eligible studies. Studies were included if they investigated exercise snacks-brief intermittent bouts of physical activity spread across the day-in adults or older adults. We included epidemiological, experimental, quasi-experimental and qualitative studies that examined the effect of exercise snacks on any health outcomes or described barriers to and enablers of these approaches. Thirty-two studies were included (7 trial registers, 1 published protocol, 3 epidemiological studies and 20 trials reported across 21 studies). Three main terms were used to describe exercise snacks: exercise snack(ing), snacktivity and vigorous intermittent lifestyle physical activity (VILPA). Participants were predominantly physically inactive but otherwise healthy adults or older adults. Exercise snacks were feasible and appeared safe. Epidemiological studies showed steep, near-linear associations of VILPA with reduced all-cause, cardiovascular and cancer mortality as well as reduced incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events and cancer. The limited trial evidence showed exercise snacks had modest effects on improving cardiorespiratory fitness, whereas effects on physical function, mood, quality of life and other health outcomes were equivocal. In conclusion, exercise snacks appear feasible and safe for adults and older adults and may have promising health benefits, but this is mostly based on findings from a limited number of small quasi-experimental studies, small randomised trials or qualitative studies. More studies are needed in individuals with chronic disease. This emerging physical activity approach may have appeal for individuals who find structured exercise unfeasible.Registration https://osf.io/qhu24/.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew D Jones
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
- Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Briana K Clifford
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Emmanuel Stamatakis
- Mackenzie Wearables Research Hub, Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Mitchell T Gibbs
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Krouwel M, Greenfield SM, Chalkley A, Sanders JP, Parretti HM, Gokal K, Jolly K, Skrybant M, Biddle SJH, Greaves C, Maddison R, Mutrie N, Ives N, Esliger DW, Sherar L, Edwardson CL, Yates T, Frew E, Tearne S, Daley AJ. Promoting participation in physical activity through Snacktivity: A qualitative mixed methods study. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0291040. [PMID: 37695785 PMCID: PMC10495025 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Public health guidance acknowledges the benefits of physical activity of any duration. We have proposed a whole-day approach to promoting physical activity called Snacktivity™, which encourages frequent 2-5 minute 'activity snacks' of moderate-to-vigorous intensity. METHODS Using repeated semi-structured interviews and a think aloud protocol, this study aimed to understand participants' experiences of integrating Snacktivity™ into daily life, to provide insights to refine the delivery of Snacktivity™ interventions. Physically inactive adults recruited via primary care and a community health service engaged with an intervention to encourage Snacktivity™ over three weeks, which included using a Fitbit and linked mobile phone app (SnackApp). Participants took part in semi-structured interviews on two occasions during the intervention, with a sub-group participating in a think aloud study. Three study data sets were generated and independently explored using inductive thematic analysis, with findings combined into a single set of themes. RESULTS Eleven adults participated in the interview study who were interviewed twice (total interviews completed n = 21, 1 participant declined the second interview), of whom six completed the think aloud study (total voice recordings n = 103). Three main themes emerged from the combined data; lived experience of participating in Snacktivity™, motivation for Snacktivity™ and experiences with the Snacktivity™ technology. Participants undertook a variety of activity snacks, utilising their environment, which they believed improved their psychological wellbeing. Participants were enthusiastic about Snacktivity™, with some stating that activity snacks were more accessible than traditional exercise, but perceived they were often prevented from doing so in the presence of others. Participants were mostly enthusiastic about using the Snacktivity™ technology. CONCLUSION Participants were able to incorporate Snacktivity™ into their lives, particularly at home, and found this approach acceptable. Participants felt they experienced health benefits from Snacktivity™ although barriers to participation were reported. This study offers insights for translating guidance into practice and supporting people to become more physically active.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Krouwel
- Centre for Lifestyle Medicine and Behaviour, School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, United Kingdom
| | - Sheila M. Greenfield
- Institute for Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Anna Chalkley
- Centre for Applied Education Research, Wolfson Centre for Applied Health Research, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom
| | - James P. Sanders
- Centre for Lifestyle Medicine and Behaviour, School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, United Kingdom
| | - Helen M. Parretti
- Norwich Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom
| | - Kajal Gokal
- Centre for Lifestyle Medicine and Behaviour, School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, United Kingdom
| | - Kate Jolly
- Institute for Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Magdalena Skrybant
- Institute for Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Stuart J. H. Biddle
- University of Southern Queensland, Springfield, Australia and Faculty of Sport & Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland
| | - Colin Greaves
- School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Ralph Maddison
- Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Nanette Mutrie
- Physical Activity for Health Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Natalie Ives
- Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, Institute for Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Dale W. Esliger
- School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, United Kingdom
| | - Lauren Sherar
- School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, United Kingdom
| | - Charlotte L. Edwardson
- Diabetes Research Centre, College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester and NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | - Tom Yates
- Diabetes Research Centre, College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester and NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | - Emma Frew
- Health Economics Unit, Institute for Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah Tearne
- Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, Institute for Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Amanda J. Daley
- Centre for Lifestyle Medicine and Behaviour, School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Daley AJ, Griffin RA, Moakes CA, Sanders JP, Skrybant M, Ives N, Maylor B, Greenfield SM, Gokal K, Parretti HM, Biddle SJH, Greaves C, Maddison R, Mutrie N, Esliger DW, Sherar L, Edwardson CL, Yates T, Frew E, Tearne S, Jolly K. Snacktivity™ to promote physical activity and reduce future risk of disease in the population: protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial and nested qualitative study. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2023; 9:45. [PMID: 36932423 PMCID: PMC10021043 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-023-01272-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2022] [Accepted: 03/04/2023] [Indexed: 03/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many people do not regularly participate in physical activity, which may negatively impact their health. Current physical activity guidelines are focused on promoting weekly accumulation of at least 150 min of moderate to vigorous intensity physical activity (MVPA). Whilst revised guidance now recognises the importance of making small changes to physical activity behaviour, guidance still focuses on adults needing to achieve at least 150 min of MVPA per week. An alternative 'whole day' approach that could motivate the public to be more physically active, is a concept called Snacktivity™. Instead of focusing on achieving 150 min per week of physical activity, for example 30 min of MVPA over 5 days, Snacktivity™ encourages the public to achieve this through small, but frequent, 2-5 min 'snacks' of MVPA throughout the whole day. METHODS The primary aim is to undertake a feasibility trial with nested qualitative interviews to assess the feasibility and acceptability of the Snacktivity™ intervention to inform the design of a subsequent phase III randomised trial. A two-arm randomised controlled feasibility trial aiming to recruit 80 inactive adults will be conducted. Recruitment will be from health and community settings and social media. Participants will be individually randomised (1:1 ratio) to receive either the Snacktivity™ intervention or usual care. The intervention will last 12 weeks with assessment of outcomes completed before and after the intervention in all participants. We are interested in whether the Snacktivity™ trial is appealing to participants (assessed by the recruitment rate) and if the Snacktivity™ intervention and trial methods are acceptable to participants (assessed by Snacktivity™/physical activity adherence and retention rates). The intervention will be delivered by health care providers within health care consultations or by researchers. Participants' experiences of the trial and intervention, and health care providers' views of delivering the intervention within health consultations will be explored. DISCUSSION The development of physical activity interventions that can be delivered at scale are needed. The findings from this study will inform the viability and design of a phase III trial to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of Snacktivity™ to increase physical activity. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN: 64851242.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda J Daley
- Centre for Lifestyle Medicine and Behaviour, School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK.
| | - Ryan A Griffin
- Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, Institute for Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Catherine A Moakes
- Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, Institute for Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - James P Sanders
- Centre for Lifestyle Medicine and Behaviour, School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK
| | - Magdalena Skrybant
- Institute for Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Natalie Ives
- Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, Institute for Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Ben Maylor
- Diabetes Research Centre, College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester and NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Leicester, UK
| | - Sheila M Greenfield
- Institute for Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Kajal Gokal
- Centre for Lifestyle Medicine and Behaviour, School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK
| | - Helen M Parretti
- Norwich Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Stuart J H Biddle
- University of Southern Queensland, Springfield, Australia.,Faculty of Sport & Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland
| | - Colin Greaves
- School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Ralph Maddison
- Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Nanette Mutrie
- Physical Activity for Health Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Dale W Esliger
- School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK
| | - Lauren Sherar
- School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK
| | - Charlotte L Edwardson
- Diabetes Research Centre, College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester and NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Leicester, UK
| | - Tom Yates
- Diabetes Research Centre, College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester and NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Leicester, UK
| | - Emma Frew
- Health Economics Unit, Institute for Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Sarah Tearne
- Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, Institute for Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Kate Jolly
- Institute for Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Agbangla NF, Séba MP, Bunlon F. Snacktivity TM, Giant Games and Immersive Virtual Reality Exercises: A Rapid Narrative Review of These New Physical Activity Practices among Older People Living in Nursing Homes and Long-Term Care Facilities. Healthcare (Basel) 2022; 10:1897. [PMID: 36292344 PMCID: PMC9601483 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10101897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2022] [Revised: 09/24/2022] [Accepted: 09/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2023] Open
Abstract
In developed countries, the increasing number of older adults raises many public health challenges. Physical activity can enable healthy aging, as it is beneficial for both mental and physical health. Despite this, not all older adults engage in physical activity or have access to it. To counteract this, new physical practices such as SnacktivityTM, giant games and immersive virtual reality exercises are being developed. The main objective of this rapid narrative review is to summarize the effects of SnacktivityTM, giant games and immersive Virtual Reality (VR) exercise among older adults living in nursing homes and long-term care facilities. A scientific review was performed using the search engines PubMed, PsycInfo and Web of Science on 7 July 2022. Fifty-nine items are identified in total, and five items are included in the literature review. Synthesis of the studies shows that immersive virtual reality and giant games improve the motivation and enjoyment of older adults and are beneficial for their functional abilities. Furthermore, no interventional studies have tested the effect of SnacktivityTM in older adults. This review suggests that future studies should be conducted to further explore the effects of these new physical activity practices in older adults living in nursing homes or long-term care facilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nounagnon Frutueux Agbangla
- Unité de Recherche Pluridisciplinaire Sport Santé Société (URePSSS), ULR 7369, Univ. Artois, Univ. Lille, Univ. Littoral Côte d’Opale, F-62800 Lille, France
| | - Marie-Philippine Séba
- Institut des Sciences du Sport-Santé de Paris (URP 3625), Université Paris Cité, F-75015 Paris, France
| | | |
Collapse
|