1
|
Craig CE, Schnorr CD, Then Paulino CJ, Payano EC, Guzmán PM, Ripkey C, de St Aubin M, Dumas D, Roberts KW, Duke W, Skewes-Ramm R, Lozier MJ, Nilles EJ. Hand hygiene perceptions, preferences, and practices among hospital staff in the Dominican Republic in the context of COVID-19: a qualitative study. Infect Prev Pract 2024; 6:100367. [PMID: 38765916 PMCID: PMC11101936 DOI: 10.1016/j.infpip.2024.100367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 04/10/2024] [Indexed: 05/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Proper hand hygiene (HH), which includes sanitizing with alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR) (or handwashing with soap and water if ABHR is unavailable), is key for preventing healthcare-associated infections (HCAI), including COVID-19. Understanding drivers of HH is key to improving adherence. Aim This study aims to explore drivers and barriers to HH practice at two hospitals in the Dominican Republic in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic to inform development of HH behaviour change interventions. Methods We conducted in-depth interviews with 20 hospital staff during September 2021. We used the COM-B (capability, opportunity, motivation, behaviour) model to explore HH experiences and preferences. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, coded, and analysed using a thematic approach. Results A total of 11 parent codes and 27 sub-codes were identified, and 1145 coded segments were analysed. Use of handwashing with soap and water and/or sanitizing with ABHR was reported by all participants; handwashing was generally preferred. Participants expressed knowledge of proper HH methods (capability), but inconsistent supplies and lack of time presented HH challenges (opportunity). Interviewees described practicing HH to protect themselves and their families from COVID-19 and other infections (reflective motivation) or out of habit (automatic motivation). Discussion By understanding and addressing underlying factors affecting HH, hospitals can decrease the risk of HCAIs. Our findings suggest that interventions implemented to improve HH in these hospitals should target motivation and opportunity. These findings informed a multimodal intervention to increase ABHR access and implement message-tested communications campaigns; end-point assessments will provide insights into the intervention's impact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina E. Craig
- National Center for Emerging Zoonotic and Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Charles D. Schnorr
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Infectious Diseases & Epidemics Program, Harvard Humanitarian Initiative, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Cecilia J. Then Paulino
- Dirección General de Epidemiología, Ministry of Public Health and Social Assistance, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
| | | | | | - Carrie Ripkey
- Infectious Disease Program, CDC Foundation, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Michael de St Aubin
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Infectious Diseases & Epidemics Program, Harvard Humanitarian Initiative, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Devan Dumas
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Infectious Diseases & Epidemics Program, Harvard Humanitarian Initiative, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Kathryn W. Roberts
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Infectious Diseases & Epidemics Program, Harvard Humanitarian Initiative, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - William Duke
- Universidad Nacional Pedro Henríquez Ureña, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
| | - Ronald Skewes-Ramm
- Dirección General de Epidemiología, Ministry of Public Health and Social Assistance, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
| | - Matthew J. Lozier
- National Center for Emerging Zoonotic and Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Eric J. Nilles
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Infectious Diseases & Epidemics Program, Harvard Humanitarian Initiative, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Logie CH, Okumu M, Berry I, Kortenaar JL, Hakiza R, Musoke DK, Katisi B, Nakitende A, Kyambadde P, Lester R, Perez-Brumer AG, Admassu Z, Mbuagbaw L. Kukaa Salama (Staying Safe): a pre-post trial of an interactive informational mobile health intervention for increasing COVID-19 prevention practices with urban refugee youth in Uganda. Int Health 2024; 16:107-116. [PMID: 37458073 PMCID: PMC10759295 DOI: 10.1093/inthealth/ihad051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2022] [Revised: 06/08/2023] [Accepted: 06/23/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tailored coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) prevention strategies are needed for urban refugee youth in resource-constrained contexts. We developed an 8-wk interactive informational mobile health intervention focused on COVID-19 prevention practices informed by the Risk, Attitude, Norms, Ability, Self-regulation-or RANAS-approach. METHODS We conducted a pre-post trial with a community-recruited sample of refugee youth aged 16-24 y in Kampala, Uganda. Data were collected before (T1) and immediately following (T2) the intervention, and at the 16-wk follow up (T3), to examine changes in primary (COVID-19 prevention self-efficacy) and secondary outcomes (COVID-19 risk awareness, attitudes, norms and self-regulation practices; depression; sexual and reproductive health [SRH] access; food/water security; COVID-19 vaccine acceptability). RESULTS Participants (n=346; mean age: 21.2 [SD 2.6] y; cisgender women: 50.3%; cisgender men: 48.0%; transgender persons: 1.7%) were largely retained (T2: n=316, 91.3%; T3: n=302, 87.3%). In adjusted analyses, COVID-19 prevention self-efficacy, risk awareness, attitudes and vaccine acceptance increased significantly from T1 to T2, but were not sustained at T3. Between T1 and T3, COVID-19 norms and self-regulation significantly increased, while community violence, water insecurity and community SRH access decreased. CONCLUSIONS Digital approaches for behaviour change hold promise with urban refugee youth but may need booster messaging and complementary programming for sustained effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmen H Logie
- Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1V4, Canada
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1B2, Canada
- Centre for Gender & Sexual Health Equity, Vancouver, BC V6Z 2K5, Canada
| | - Moses Okumu
- School of Social Work, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61820, United States
- School of Social Sciences, Uganda Christian University, Mukono, Uganda
| | - Isha Berry
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5T 3M7, Canada
| | - Jean-Luc Kortenaar
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5T 3M7, Canada
| | - Robert Hakiza
- Young African Refugees for Integral Development (YARID), Kampala, Uganda
| | | | - Brenda Katisi
- Young African Refugees for Integral Development (YARID), Kampala, Uganda
| | | | - Peter Kyambadde
- National AIDS and STI Control Programme, Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda
- Most at Risk Population Initiative, Mulago Hospital, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Richard Lester
- Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - Amaya G Perez-Brumer
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5T 3M7, Canada
| | - Zerihun Admassu
- Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1V4, Canada
| | - Lawrence Mbuagbaw
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8, Canada
- Department of Anesthesia, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada
- Biostatistics Unit, Father Sean O'Sullivan Research Centre, St Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton, ON L8G 5E4, Canada
- Centre for Development of Best Practices in Health (CDBPH), Yaoundé Central Hospital, Yaoundé, Cameroon
- Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Global Health, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Buis L, Amrein MA, Bäder C, Ruschetti GG, Rüttimann C, Del Rio Carral M, Fabian C, Inauen J. Promoting Hand Hygiene During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Parallel Randomized Trial for the Optimization of the Soapp App. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2023; 11:e43241. [PMID: 36599056 PMCID: PMC9938438 DOI: 10.2196/43241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2022] [Revised: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hand hygiene is an effective behavior for preventing the spread of the respiratory disease COVID-19 and was included in public health guidelines worldwide. Behavior change interventions addressing hand hygiene have the potential to support the adherence to public health recommendations and, thereby, prevent the spread of COVID-19. However, randomized trials are largely absent during a pandemic; therefore, there is little knowledge about the most effective strategies to promote hand hygiene during an ongoing pandemic. This study addresses this gap by presenting the results of the optimization phase of a Multiphase Optimization Strategy of Soapp, a smartphone app for promoting hand hygiene in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to identify the most effective combination and sequence of 3 theory- and evidence-based intervention modules (habit, motivation, and social norms) for promoting hand hygiene. To this end, 9 versions of Soapp were developed (conditions), and 2 optimization criteria were defined: the condition with the largest increase in hand hygiene at follow-up and condition with the highest engagement, usability, and satisfaction based on quantitative and qualitative analyses. METHODS This study was a parallel randomized trial with 9 intervention conditions defined by the combination of 2 intervention modules and their sequence. The trial was conducted from March to August 2021 with interested participants from the Swiss general population (N=232; randomized). Randomization was performed using Qualtrics (Qualtrics International Inc), and blinding was ensured. The duration of the intervention was 34 days. The primary outcome was self-reported hand hygiene at follow-up, which was assessed using an electronic diary. The secondary outcomes were user engagement, usability, and satisfaction assessed at follow-up. Nine participants were further invited to participate in semistructured exit interviews. A set of ANOVAs was performed to test the main hypotheses, whereas a thematic analysis was performed to analyze the qualitative data. RESULTS The results showed a significant increase in hand hygiene over time across all conditions. There was no interaction effect between time and intervention condition. Similarly, no between-group differences in engagement, usability, and satisfaction emerged. Seven themes (eg, "variety and timeliness of the task load" and "social interaction") were found in the thematic analysis. CONCLUSIONS The effectiveness of Soapp in promoting hand hygiene laid the foundation for the next evaluation phase of the app. More generally, the study supported the value of digital interventions in pandemic contexts. The findings showed no differential effect of intervention conditions involving different combinations and sequences of the habit, motivation, and social norms modules on hand hygiene, engagement, usability, and satisfaction. In the absence of quantitative differences, we relied on the results from the thematic analysis to select the best version of Soapp for the evaluation phase. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04830761; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04830761. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) RR2-10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055971.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Carole Bäder
- Institute of Psychology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | - Carlo Fabian
- Institute for Social Work and Health, FHNW School of Social Work, Olten, Switzerland
| | - Jennifer Inauen
- Institute of Psychology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Social cognition theories and behavior change in COVID-19: A conceptual review. Behav Res Ther 2022; 154:104095. [PMID: 35605335 PMCID: PMC9005242 DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2022.104095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2021] [Revised: 03/31/2022] [Accepted: 04/08/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has had unprecedented health, economic, and social consequences worldwide. Although contact reductions and wearing face coverings have reduced infection rates, and vaccines have reduced illness severity, emergence of new variants of the coronavirus that causes COVID-19, and the shift from pandemic to endemic patterns of infection, highlights the importance of ongoing preventive behavior adherence to manage future outbreaks. Research applying social cognition theories may assist in explaining variance in these behaviors and inform the development of efficacious behavior change interventions to promote adherence. In the present article, we summarize research applying these theories to identify modifiable determinants of COVID-19 preventive behaviors and the mechanisms involved, and their utility in informing interventions. We identify limitations of these applications (e.g., overreliance on correlational data, lack of long-term behavioral follow-up), and suggest how they can be addressed. We demonstrate the virtue of augmenting theories with additional constructs (e.g., moral norms, anticipated regret) and processes (e.g., multiple action phases, automatic processes) to provide comprehensive, parsimonious behavioral explanations. We also outline how the theories contribute to testing mechanisms of action of behavioral interventions. Finally, we recommend future studies applying these theories to inform and test interventions to promote COVID-19 preventive behavior adherence.
Collapse
|