Antiplatelet therapy and long-term clinical outcome after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation: 5-year outcome of the j-Cypher registry

Dual Antiplatelet Therapy for 6 Versus 18 Months After Biodegradable Polymer Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation

OBJECTIVES

The NIPPON (Nobori Dual Antiplatelet Therapy as Appropriate Duration) study was a multicenter randomized investigation of the noninferiority of short-term versus long-term dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients with implantation of the Nobori drug-eluting stent (DES) (Terumo, Tokyo, Japan), which has a biodegradable abluminal coating.

BACKGROUND

The optimum duration of DAPT for patients with a biodegradable polymer-coated DES is unclear.

METHODS

The subjects were 3,773 patients with stable or acute coronary syndromes undergoing Nobori stent implantation. They were randomized 1:1 to receive DAPT for 6 or 18 months. The primary endpoint was net adverse clinical and cerebrovascular events (NACCE) (all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, and major bleeding) from 6 to 18 months after stenting. Intention-to-treat analysis was performed in 3,307 patients who were followed for at least 6 months.

RESULTS

NACCE occurred in 34 patients (2.1%) receiving short-term DAPT and 24 patients (1.5%) receiving long-term DAPT (difference 0.6%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.5 to 0.3). Because the lower limit of the 95% CI was inside the specified margin of -2%, noninferiority of short-term DAPT was confirmed. Mortality was 1.0% with short-term DAPT versus 0.4% with long-term DAPT, whereas myocardial infarction was 0.2% versus 0.1%, and major bleeding was 0.7% versus 0.7%, respectively. The estimated probability of NACCE was lower in the long-term DAPT group (hazard ratio: 1.44, 95% CI: 0.86 to 2.43).

CONCLUSIONS

Six months of DAPT was not inferior to 18 months of DAPT following implantation of a DES with a biodegradable abluminal coating. However, this result needs to be interpreted with caution given the open-label design and wide noninferiority margin of the present study. (Nobori Dual Antiplatelet Therapy as Appropriate Duration [NIPPON]; NCT01514227).

Clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome between hospitals with and without onsite cardiac surgery backup

BACKGROUND

Based on the 2011 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) guideline, it is recommended that PCI should be performed at hospital with onsite cardiac surgery. But, data suggest that there is no significant difference in clinical outcomes following primary or elective PCI between the two groups. We examined the impact of with or without onsite cardiac surgery on clinical outcomes following PCI for acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

METHODS AND RESULTS

From August 2008 to March 2011, subjects (n=3241) were enrolled from the Kumamoto Intervention Conference Study (KICS). Patients were assigned to two groups treated in hospitals with (n=2764) or without (n=477) onsite cardiac surgery. Clinical events were followed up for 12 months. Primary endpoint was in-hospital death, cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke. And we monitored in-hospital events, non-cardiovascular deaths, bleeding complications, revascularizations, and emergent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). There was no overall significant difference in primary endpoint between hospitals with and without onsite cardiac surgery [ACS, 7.6% vs. 8.0%, p=0.737; ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), 10.4% vs. 7.5%, p=0.200]. There was also no significant difference when events in primary endpoint were considered separately. In other events, revascularization was more frequently seen in hospitals with onsite surgery (ACS, 20.0% vs. 13.0%, p<0.001; STEMI, 21.9% vs. 14.5%, p=0.009). We performed propensity score matching analysis to correct for the disparate patient numbers between the two groups, and there was also no significant difference for primary endpoint (ACS, 8.6% vs. 7.5%, p=0.547; STEMI, 11.2% vs. 7.5%, p=0.210).

CONCLUSIONS

There is no significant difference in clinical outcomes following PCI for ACS between hospitals with and without onsite cardiac surgery backup in Japan.

Antiplatelet therapy discontinuation and the risk of serious cardiovascular events after coronary stenting: observations from the CREDO-Kyoto Registry Cohort-2

Relation of antiplatelet therapy (APT) discontinuation with the risk of serious cardiovascular events has not been fully addressed yet. This study is aimed to evaluate the risk of ischemic event after APT discontinuation based on long-term APT status of large cohort. In the CREDO-Kyoto Registry Cohort-2 enrolling 15939 consecutive patients undergoing first coronary revascularization, 10470 patients underwent percutaneous coronary intervention either with bare-metal stents (BMS) only (N=5392) or sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) only (N=5078). Proportions of patients taking dual-APT were 67.3% versus 33.4% at 1-year, and 48.7% versus 24.3% at 5-year in the SES and BMS strata, respectively. We evaluated daily APT status (dual-, single- and no-APT) and linked the adverse events to the APT status just 1-day before the events. No-APT as compared with dual- or single-APT was associated with significantly higher risk for stent thrombosis (ST) beyond 1-month after SES implantation (cumulative incidence rates beyond 1-month: 1.23 versus 0.15/0.29, P<0.001/P<0.001), while higher risk of no-APT for ST was evident only until 6-month after BMS implantation (incidence rates between 1- and 6-month: 8.43 versus 0.71/1.20, P<0.001/P<0.001, and cumulative incidence rates beyond 6-month: 0.31 versus 0.11/0.08, P=0.16/P=0.08). No-APT as compared with dual- or single-APT was also associated with significantly higher risk for spontaneous myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke regardless of the types of stents implanted. Single-APT as compared with dual-APT was not associated with higher risk for serious adverse events, except for the marginally higher risk for ST in the SES stratum. In conclusion, discontinuation of both aspirin and thienopyridines was associated with increased risk for serious cardiovascular events including ST, spontaneous MI and stroke beyond 1-month after coronary stenting.

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention and bleeding risk in the era of drug-eluting stent: a long-term cohort study

Data of long-term efficacy and safety including bleeding risk associated with antithrombotic regimens after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using first-generation drug-eluting stent (1st DES) are scarce. Consecutive 422 patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) underwent primary PCI with DES (285 patients), bare metal stent (BMS, 58 patients) or balloon angioplasty (BA 79 patients). At a median follow-up of 44 months, major cardiovascular events were significantly lower for 1st DES compared with BMS and BA (11.9 vs. 25.9 vs. 16.5 %, p = 0.027). Cardiac death, recurrent myocardial infarction and target lesion revascularization (TLR), differed among the groups (DES 8.8 %; BMS 13.8 %; BA 17.7 %; p = 0.019), although the superiority of DES subsided beyond 1 year by increased late TLRs. Major bleedings were not higher in DES than in BMS and BA (4.6 vs. 6.9 vs. 1.5 %, p = 0.252). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that both dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) >24 months and indefinite oral anticoagulation (OAC) were associated with a major bleeding. The risk was even greater with triple antithrombotic therapy (odds ratio 19.5; 95 % confidence interval 3.73-102.07; p < 0.0001). 1st DES showed favorable overall long-term clinical outcome in STEMI, with an inherent limitation of an increased risk of late TLR. Prolonged DAPT and OAC synergistically increase the risk of major bleeding after primary PCI.

Impact of angiographic peri-stent contrast staining (PSS) on late adverse events after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation: an observation from the multicenter j-Cypher registry PSS substudy

This study sought to assess clinical significance of angiographic peri-stent contrast staining (PSS) after sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation in a large multicenter study with 5-year follow-up. The j-Cypher PSS substudy is a multicenter study including 5712 patients (7838 lesions) who underwent follow-up angiographic study within 12 months after SES implantation. Late acquired PSS was observed in 184 patients (3.2 %) or 194 lesions (2.5 %). Independent risk factors of PSS were chronic total occlusion and left anterior descending artery lesion, while negative risk factors were in-stent restenosis, diabetes mellitus, ≥70 years of age, and left circumflex coronary artery lesion. Cumulative incidence of definite very late stent thrombosis (VLST) at 4 years after the index follow-up angiography in lesions with PSS was significantly higher than that in lesions without PSS (5.3 versus 0.7 %, P < 0.0001). Late target-lesion revascularization (TLR) was also more frequently observed in the PSS group (13 versus 6.9 %, P = 0.01), while late TLR for restenosis excluding those TLR procedures for VLST tended to be higher in the PSS group (9.9 versus 6.3 %; P = 0.15). PSS found in 2.5 % of lesions within 12 months after SES implantation was associated with higher risk for subsequent VLST.

A case report of very late stent thrombosis observed simultaneously in all three vessels 5 years after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation

A 67-year-old man with recent myocardial infarction underwent a total of five sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) implantation for three vessels stage by stage. A follow-up angiography showed no significant restenosis except one in the side branch. Thereafter, he had remained asymptomatic. Sixty-six months later, he had an acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock due to simultaneous 3-vessel very late stent thrombosis (VLST). After successful percutaneous coronary intervention, final angiography revealed serious peri-stent contrast staining along with positive remodeling and grade V stent fracture. This rare case illustrates simultaneous 3-vessel VLST, associating with multiple SES-related problems, under continuation of aspirin and cilostazol.

Angiographic findings of everolimus-eluting as compared to sirolimus-eluting stents: angiographic sub-study from the Randomized Evaluation of Sirolimus-eluting versus Everolimus-eluting stent Trial (RESET)

Several recent randomized trials comparing everolimus-eluting stent (EES) and sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) reported similar clinical outcomes. This study was aimed to clarify the differences in the angiographic findings of EES as compared to SES. Randomized Evaluation of Sirolimus-eluting versus Everolimus-eluting stent Trial is a prospective multicenter randomized open-label trial comparing EES with SES in Japan. From February to July 2010, 3197 patients were randomly assigned to receive either EES or SES. Of these, angiographic sub-study enrolled 571 patients (EES 285 patients, SES 286 patients). Angiograms were assessed qualitatively and quantitatively at procedure and at 8-12 months in the independent core angiographic laboratory. Late loss of the proximal edges tended to be greater in the EES group than that in the SES group (0.12 ± 0.49 vs. 0.04 ± 0.43 mm, P = 0.05), although late loss in the other segments was similar between the 2 groups. Edge restenosis was mainly observed in EES group, whereas body restenosis was demonstrated in half of SES group. Stent fracture was observed only in the SES group (1.5 %), and peri-stent contrast staining (PSS) tended to be more frequently observed in the SES group than in the EES group (3.6 and 1.5 %, P = 0.18). Restenotic response in the proximal edge was more prominent in the EES group as compared to the SES group. Abnormal angiographic findings such as stent fracture and PSS tended to be more frequent in the SES group.

Impact of proton pump inhibitors or famotidine on the antiplatelet actions during dual-antiplatelet therapy in Japanese patients

BACKGROUND

It has been reported that the antiplatelet action becomes attenuated when a proton pump inhibitor is used in combination with clopidogrel.

PURPOSE

The effect of an antacid causing platelet aggregation during the administration of clopidogrel was investigated.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

The subjects consisted of 265 patients with coronary artery disease. Platelet aggregation function testing (light transmittance aggregometry) was conducted while aspirin and clopidogrel 75 mg were taken orally and the minimum concentration of aggregation induction platelet aggregation threshold index was measured. The ADP-PATI, measured with ADP as the inducing substance, was compared and investigated according to the type of concomitantly used antacid.

RESULT

The results of the ADP-PATI were: control group: 3.47 ± 0.95 μM (N = 67), famotidine group: 3.80 ± 0.52 μM (N = 32), rabeprazole group: 3.43 ± 0.93 μM (N = 87), lansoprazole group: 3.28 ± 1.04 μM (N = 63) and omeprazole group: 3.33 ± 0.81 μM (N = 16). No statistically significant difference was observed regarding the ADP-PATI of respective groups compared to the control group.

CONCLUSION

The concomitant use of famotidine, rabeprazole, lansoprazole, and omeprazole did not affect the antiplatelet action of clopidogrel in Japanese patients.