1
|
Moller SR, Campos MA, Rilling JI, Bakkour R, Hollenback AJ, Jorquera MA, Jaisi DP. Persistence and pathway of glyphosate degradation in the coastal wetland soil of central Delaware. JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS 2024; 477:135238. [PMID: 39096637 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.135238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2024] [Revised: 06/17/2024] [Accepted: 07/16/2024] [Indexed: 08/05/2024]
Abstract
Glyphosate is a globally dominant herbicide. Here, we studied the degradation and microbial response to glyphosate application in a wetland soil in central Delaware for controlling invasive species (Phragmites australis). We applied a two-step solid-phase extraction method using molecularly imprinted polymers designed for the separation and enrichment of glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA) from soils before their analysis by ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC) and Q Exactive Orbitrap mass spectrometry methods. Our results showed that approximately 90 % of glyphosate degraded over 100 d after application, with AMPA being a minor (<10 %) product. Analysis of glyphosate-specific microbial genes to identify microbial response and function revealed that the expression of the phnJ gene, which codes C-P lyase enzyme, was consistently dominant over the gox gene, which codes glyphosate oxidoreductase enzyme, after glyphosate application. Both gene and concentration data independently suggested that C-P bond cleavage-which forms sarcosine or glycine-was the dominant degradation pathway. This is significant because AMPA, a more toxic product, is reported to be the preferred pathway of glyphosate degradation in other soil and natural environments. The degradation through a safer pathway is encouraging for minimizing the detrimental impacts of glyphosate on the environment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Spencer R Moller
- Interdisciplinary Science and Engineering Laboratory, Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA; Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
| | - Marco A Campos
- Laboratorio de Investigación en Salud de Precisión, Departamento de Procesos Diagnósticos y Evaluación, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Católica de Temuco, Manuel Montt 056, Temuco 4780000, Chile; Laboratorio de Ecologia Microbiana Aplicada (EMALAB), Departamento de Ciencias Quimicas y Recursos Naturales, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile
| | - Joaquin I Rilling
- Laboratorio de Ecologia Microbiana Aplicada (EMALAB), Departamento de Ciencias Quimicas y Recursos Naturales, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile
| | - Rani Bakkour
- Chair of Analytical Chemistry and Water Chemistry, School of Natural Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Garching 85748, Germany
| | - Anthony J Hollenback
- Interdisciplinary Science and Engineering Laboratory, Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA
| | - Milko A Jorquera
- Laboratorio de Ecologia Microbiana Aplicada (EMALAB), Departamento de Ciencias Quimicas y Recursos Naturales, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile
| | - Deb P Jaisi
- Interdisciplinary Science and Engineering Laboratory, Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Masotti F, Garavaglia BS, Piazza A, Burdisso P, Altabe S, Gottig N, Ottado J. Bacterial isolates from Argentine Pampas and their ability to degrade glyphosate. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2021; 774:145761. [PMID: 33610979 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2020] [Revised: 02/05/2021] [Accepted: 02/06/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Glyphosate is a synthetic phosphonate compound characterized by a carbon‑phosphorus bond. Glyphosate based herbicides (GBH) are widely distributed in most of the economically productive lands in which crop production is mainly based on glyphosate-resistant genetically modified plants. Naturally, glyphosate is remediated by soil microorganisms, which accelerate its degradation. Technology based on microorganisms is considered highly efficient, low-cost and eco-friendly to remediate contaminated environments, denoting the importance of characterizing new bacterial strains able to degrade glyphosate to perform its bioremediation. In this work, 13 different bacterial strains able to grow in GBH as only phosphorous source were isolated from different environmental samples from the Argentine vastly productive glyphosate-resistant soybean crop area. These strains were identified and they belong to the genera Acinetobacter, Achromobacter, Agrobacterium, Ochrobactrum, Pantoea and Pseudomonas. Their ability to grow and consume GBH, glyphosate or the aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA), another phosphonate derived from glyphosate degradation, was evaluated. The best degradation performance was observed for bacteria from the genera Achromobacter, Agrobacterium and Ochrobactrum. The genome of the highly efficient GBH degrader Agrobacterium tumefaciens CHLDO was sequenced revealing the presence of a phn cluster, responsible for phosphonate metabolization. Expression analysis of A. tumefaciens CHLDO phn genes in the presence of 1.5 mM GBH compared to inorganic phosphorous showed that most of them are highly expressed during growth in the presence of the herbicide, suggesting a strong participation of phn cluster in GBH degradation. The importance of discovering new bacterial strains and the value of deciphering molecular determinants of GBH degradation give promising tools for bioremediation techniques to be used in glyphosate-contaminated environments is discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fiorella Masotti
- Instituto de Biología Molecular y Celular de Rosario, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (IBR-CONICET) and Facultad de Ciencias Bioquímicas y Farmacéuticas, Universidad Nacional de Rosario (UNR), Ocampo y Esmeralda, Rosario 2000, Argentina.
| | - Betiana S Garavaglia
- Instituto de Biología Molecular y Celular de Rosario, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (IBR-CONICET) and Facultad de Ciencias Bioquímicas y Farmacéuticas, Universidad Nacional de Rosario (UNR), Ocampo y Esmeralda, Rosario 2000, Argentina.
| | - Ainelén Piazza
- Instituto de Biología Molecular y Celular de Rosario, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (IBR-CONICET) and Facultad de Ciencias Bioquímicas y Farmacéuticas, Universidad Nacional de Rosario (UNR), Ocampo y Esmeralda, Rosario 2000, Argentina.
| | - Paula Burdisso
- Instituto de Biología Molecular y Celular de Rosario, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (IBR-CONICET) and Facultad de Ciencias Bioquímicas y Farmacéuticas, Universidad Nacional de Rosario (UNR), Ocampo y Esmeralda, Rosario 2000, Argentina; Plataforma Argentina de Biología Estructural y Metabolómica (PLABEM), Ocampo y Esmeralda, Rosario 2000, Argentina.
| | - Silvia Altabe
- Instituto de Biología Molecular y Celular de Rosario, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (IBR-CONICET) and Facultad de Ciencias Bioquímicas y Farmacéuticas, Universidad Nacional de Rosario (UNR), Ocampo y Esmeralda, Rosario 2000, Argentina.
| | - Natalia Gottig
- Instituto de Biología Molecular y Celular de Rosario, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (IBR-CONICET) and Facultad de Ciencias Bioquímicas y Farmacéuticas, Universidad Nacional de Rosario (UNR), Ocampo y Esmeralda, Rosario 2000, Argentina.
| | - Jorgelina Ottado
- Instituto de Biología Molecular y Celular de Rosario, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (IBR-CONICET) and Facultad de Ciencias Bioquímicas y Farmacéuticas, Universidad Nacional de Rosario (UNR), Ocampo y Esmeralda, Rosario 2000, Argentina.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Massot F, Gkorezis P, Van Hamme J, Marino D, Trifunovic BS, Vukovic G, d'Haen J, Pintelon I, Giulietti AM, Merini L, Vangronsveld J, Thijs S. Isolation, Biochemical and Genomic Characterization of Glyphosate Tolerant Bacteria to Perform Microbe-Assisted Phytoremediation. Front Microbiol 2021; 11:598507. [PMID: 33519737 PMCID: PMC7840833 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.598507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2020] [Accepted: 12/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The large-scale use of the herbicide glyphosate leads to growing ecotoxicological and human health concerns. Microbe-assisted phytoremediation arises as a good option to remove, contain, or degrade glyphosate from soils and waterbodies, and thus avoid further spreading to non-target areas. To achieve this, availability of plant-colonizing, glyphosate-tolerant and -degrading strains is required and at the same time, it must be linked to plant-microorganism interaction studies focusing on a substantive ability to colonize the roots and degrade or transform the herbicide. In this work, we isolated bacteria from a chronically glyphosate-exposed site in Argentina, evaluated their glyphosate tolerance using the minimum inhibitory concentration assay, their in vitro degradation potential, their plant growth-promotion traits, and performed whole genome sequencing to gain insight into the application of a phytoremediation strategy to remediate glyphosate contaminated agronomic soils. Twenty-four soil and root-associated bacterial strains were isolated. Sixteen could grow using glyphosate as the sole source of phosphorous. As shown in MIC assay, some strains tolerated up to 10000 mg kg–1 of glyphosate. Most of them also demonstrated a diverse spectrum of in vitro plant growth-promotion traits, confirmed in their genome sequences. Two representative isolates were studied for their root colonization. An isolate of Ochrobactrum haematophilum exhibited different colonization patterns in the rhizoplane compared to an isolate of Rhizobium sp. Both strains were able to metabolize almost 50% of the original glyphosate concentration of 50 mg l–1 in 9 days. In a microcosms experiment with Lotus corniculatus L, O. haematophilum performed better than Rhizobium, with 97% of glyphosate transformed after 20 days. The results suggest that L. corniculatus in combination with to O. haematophilum can be adopted for phytoremediation of glyphosate on agricultural soils. An effective strategy is presented of linking the experimental data from the isolation of tolerant bacteria with performing plant-bacteria interaction tests to demonstrate positive effects on the removal of glyphosate from soils.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francisco Massot
- Cátedra de Biotecnología, Departamento de Microbiología, Inmunología, Biotecnología y Genética, Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Junín, Argentina.,Instituto de Nanobiotecnología (NANOBIOTEC), CONICET-Universidad de Buenos Aires, Junín, Argentina
| | - Panagiotis Gkorezis
- Environmental Biology, Centre for Environmental Sciences, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium
| | - Jonathan Van Hamme
- Department of Biological Sciences, Thompson Rivers University, Kamloops, BC, Canada
| | - Damian Marino
- Centro de Investigaciones del Medio Ambiente, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Universidad Nacional de la Plata (UNLP), La Plata, Argentina
| | | | - Gorica Vukovic
- Department of Phytomedicine, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Jan d'Haen
- Institute for Materials Research (IMO-IMEC), Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium
| | - Isabel Pintelon
- Laboratory of Cell Biology and Histology, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Ana María Giulietti
- Cátedra de Biotecnología, Departamento de Microbiología, Inmunología, Biotecnología y Genética, Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Junín, Argentina.,Instituto de Nanobiotecnología (NANOBIOTEC), CONICET-Universidad de Buenos Aires, Junín, Argentina
| | | | - Jaco Vangronsveld
- Environmental Biology, Centre for Environmental Sciences, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium.,Department of Plant Physiology and Biophysics, Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, Lublin, Poland
| | - Sofie Thijs
- Environmental Biology, Centre for Environmental Sciences, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rasul M, Yasmin S, Yahya M, Breitkreuz C, Tarkka M, Reitz T. The wheat growth-promoting traits of Ochrobactrum and Pantoea species, responsible for solubilization of different P sources, are ensured by genes encoding enzymes of multiple P-releasing pathways. Microbiol Res 2021; 246:126703. [PMID: 33482437 DOI: 10.1016/j.micres.2021.126703] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2020] [Revised: 12/22/2020] [Accepted: 01/06/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
Production and release of organic acids and phosphatase enzymes by microbes are important for inorganic and organic phosphorus cycling in soil. The presence of microorganisms with corresponding traits in the plant rhizosphere lead to improved plant P uptake and ultimately growth promotion. We studied the potential of two rhizosphere-competent strains, Pantoea sp. MR1 and Ochrobactrum sp. SSR, for solubilization of different organic and inorganic P sources in vitro. In a pot experiment we further revealed the impact of the two strains on wheat seedling performance in soil amended with either phytate, rock phosphate or K2HPO4 as solely P source. To directly link P-solubilizing activity to the strain-specific genetic potential, we designed novel primers for glucose dehydrogenase (gcd), phosphatase (pho) and phytase (phy) genes, which are related to the organic and inorganic P solubilization potential. Quantitative tracing of these functional genes in the inoculated soils of the conducted pot experiment further allowed to compare strain abundances in the soil in dependency on the present P source. We observed strain- and P source-dependent patterns of the P solubilization in vitro as well as in the pot experiment, whereby P release, particularly from phytate, was linked to the strain abundance. We further revealed that the activity of microbial phosphatases is determined by the interplay between functional gene abundance, available soil P, and substrate availability. Moreover, positive impacts of microbial seed inoculation on wheat root architecture and aboveground growth parameters were observed. Our results suggest that screening for rhizosphere-competent strains with gcd, pho and phy genes may help to identify new microbial taxa that are able to solubilize and mineralize inorganic as well as organic bound P. Subsequently, the targeted use of corresponding strains may improve P availability in agricultural soils and consequently reduce fertilizer application.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Rasul
- National Institute for Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering (NIBGE), Faisalabad, Pakistan
| | - Sumera Yasmin
- National Institute for Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering (NIBGE), Faisalabad, Pakistan.
| | - Mahreen Yahya
- National Institute for Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering (NIBGE), Faisalabad, Pakistan
| | - Claudia Breitkreuz
- UFZ - Helmholtz-Centre for Environmental Research, Soil Ecology Department, Theodor-Lieser-Straße 4, 06120, Halle, Germany
| | - Mika Tarkka
- UFZ - Helmholtz-Centre for Environmental Research, Soil Ecology Department, Theodor-Lieser-Straße 4, 06120, Halle, Germany; German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Deutscher Platz 5e, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
| | - Thomas Reitz
- UFZ - Helmholtz-Centre for Environmental Research, Soil Ecology Department, Theodor-Lieser-Straße 4, 06120, Halle, Germany; German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Deutscher Platz 5e, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|