Cervical Cancer Screening in HIV-Positive Women in India: Why, When and How?

Strategies and implementation outcomes of HPV-based cervical screening studies to prevent cervical cancer in India: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

As Indian states consider HPV testing for cervical screening, there is a need to review evidence from prior studies to inform program design and evaluate implementation research gaps.

DESIGN

We conducted a systematic review of original articles in Medline, Embase, Global Health and Web of Science, published from 2000 to May 4, 2024. Articles describing use of HPV as a primary cervical screening test in India, in either community-based programs for the general population, or among women living with HIV, were included. We describe approaches to invitation, education, screening, and follow-up, and map determinants and outcomes to the RE-AIM and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research frameworks.

RESULTS

Of 71 included articles (51 unique studies), 19 reported on screening among women living with HIV, while 52 were community-based (general population of women). Self-collection was offered by 15 studies and was acceptable to most screened women. Community-based programs were mainly facility or outreach-based, with three studies offering only home-based self-collection, including one that integrated with cardiovascular risk screening. Studies from northeastern and tribal populations were scarce. Only one self-collection study used a screen and treat (at second visit) approach, but did not report follow-up, while none offered immediate treatment following a point-of-care test.

CONCLUSIONS

Community-based HPV testing, including self-collection, is feasible in India, with more research needed among underrepresented populations. Further implementation research is needed on integrating HPV screening with existing health systems, feasibility of HPV test and treat models and genotyping triage, to improve follow-up in low resource settings.

Environment and gynaecologic cancers

In the current era, environmental factors are well established as major causative agents for all cancers especially lung and breast cancer. We sought to review the current available literature on the topic pertaining to gynaecologic cancers. Although a few factors are well established in literature, others need more research to conclude.

Integration of cervical cancer screening into healthcare facilities in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review

Cervical cancer is a prevalent disease among women, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where most deaths occur. Integrating cervical cancer screening services into healthcare facilities is essential in combating the disease. Thus, this review aims to map evidence related to integrating cervical cancer screening into existing primary care services and identify associated barriers and facilitators in LMICs. The scoping review employed a five-step framework as proposed by Arksey and O'Malley. Five databases (MEDLINE, Maternity Infant Care, Scopus, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and Web of Science) were systematically searched. Data were extracted, charted, synthesized, and summarised. A total of 28 original articles conducted in LMICs from 2000 to 2023 were included. Thirty-nine percent of the reviewed studies showed that cervical cancer screening (CCS) was integrated into HIV clinics. The rest of the papers revealed that CCS was integrated into existing reproductive and sexual health clinics, maternal and child health, family planning, well-baby clinics, maternal health clinics, gynecology outpatient departments, and sexually transmitted infections clinics. The cost-effectiveness of integrated services, promotion, and international initiatives were identified as facilitators while resource scarcity, lack of skilled staff, high client loads, lack of preventive oncology policy, territorial disputes, and lack of national guidelines were identified as barriers to the services. The evidence suggests that CCS can be integrated into healthcare facilities in LMICs, in various primary care services, including HIV clinics, reproductive and sexual health clinics, well-baby clinics, maternal health clinics, and gynecology OPDs. However, barriers include limited health system capacity, workload, waiting times, and lack of coordination. Addressing these gaps could strengthen the successful integration of CCS into primary care services and improve cervical cancer prevention and treatment outcomes.

Community cervical cancer screening and precancer risk in women living with HIV in Jos Nigeria

BACKGROUND

High HIV prevalence, and lack of organized screening for the indigent population receiving care and treatment within HIV clinics in low-resource settings increases cervical cancer incidence. We sought to determine predictors of cervical precancer in women living with HIV and receiving cervical cancer screening in Jos, Nigeria.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study of women living with HIV and receiving care and treatment in adult HIV/AIDS clinics in Jos-Metropolis, Nigeria between June 2020 and April 2023. Ethical approvals were obtained from the ethics committee in Jos, Nigeria and Northwestern University IRB, USA. Informed consent was obtained from eligible participants, and data on socio-demographics, cancer risk factors, and cytology reports were collected. The outcome variables were cervical precancer lesions. The independent variables were prior Pap smear status, socio-demographics, income, educational, and other reproductive health factors. Descriptive statistics was done to obtain means ± sd, frequencies, and percentages for the variables. Univariate and bivariate analyses were done to determine predictors of cervical dysplasia. Analyses were performed using R software.

RESULTS

Of 957 women screened, 570 were living with HIV and 566 women had cytology report and were included in the final analysis. The mean age was 45.08 ± 8.89 years and 81.6% had no prior evidence of Pap test (under-screened). Prevalence of cervical dysplasia was 24% (mild and severe dysplasia were 12.9% and 11.1%, respectively). Age above 45 years (aOR = 3.48, p = 0.009), postmenopausal status (aOR = 7.69, p = 0.000), and women with no history of prior IUCD use (aOR = 5.94, p = 0.0001), were predictors for severe dysplasia. Women who had history of STI (aOR = 0.17, p = 0.000), prior use of IUCD (aOR = 0.32, p = 0.004), prior use of condom (aOR = 2.50, p = 0.003) and had co-morbidities (aOR = 0.46, p = 0.009) were more likely to have had a Pap test in the past.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of indigent women receiving care at HIV clinics had their first Pap test screening, and lack of organized screening among older and post-menopausal women with HIV, puts women at a higher risk of developing severe cervical precancer lesions.

Cervical Cancer: Early Detection and Prevention in Reproductive Age Group

Cancer has been one of the major illnesses faced by people over many generations. Despite the advancements made in medicine, there are still many problems faced by humankind. Every year a large number of people are diagnosed with cervical cancer. It is the most common type of cancerous condition prevalent among females, especially females over thirty years of age. Like any other cancer, cervical cancer also occurs because of the rapid uncontrolled division of the body cells. A primary reason for its development is the longstanding infection of certain types of human papillomavirus (HPV). A screening test is done to confirm the presence of the virus in the cervix. Many screening tests are available today for accurate diagnosis or confirmation of the condition being suffered from. The main goal of screening is early detection and making certain lifestyle changes to deduce the potential harm of the disease and start the treatment as soon as possible. A thorough study of the already published articles by scholars, professors, and doctors is carried out to conclude the necessity of cervical cancer screening and early detection.

Diagnostic accuracy of cervical cancer screening strategies for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2+/CIN3+) among women living with HIV: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

We systematically reviewed the diagnostic accuracy of cervical cancer screening and triage strategies in women living with HIV (WLHIV).

METHODS

Cochrane Library, Embase, Global Health and Medline were searched for randomised controlled trials, prospective or cross-sectional studies published from database inception to 15 July 2022 reporting diagnostic accuracy of tests in cervical cancer screening and triage of screen-positive WLHIV. Studies were included if they reported the diagnostic accuracy of any cervical cancer screening or triage strategies for the detection of histologically-confirmed high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2+/CIN3+) among WLHIV. Summary data were extracted from published reports. Authors were contacted for missing data where applicable. Sensitivity and specificity estimates for CIN2/3+ were pooled using models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy data. Study quality was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. PROSPERO registration:CRD42020189031.

FINDINGS

In 38 studies among 18,737 WLHIV, the majority (n=19) were conducted in sub-Saharan Africa. The pooled prevalence was 12.0% (95%CI:9.8-14.1) for CIN2+ and 6.7% (95%CI:5.0-8.4) for CIN3+. The proportion of screen-positive ranged from 3-31% (visual inspection using acetic acid[VIA]); 2-46% (high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, and greater [HSIL+] cytology); 20-64% (high-risk[HR]-HPV DNA). In 14 studies, sensitivity and specificity of VIA were variable limiting the reliability of pooled estimates. In 5 studies where majority had histology-confirmed CIN2+, pooled sensitivity was 56.0% (95%CI:45.4-66.1; I²=65%) for CIN2+ and 65.0% (95%CI:52.9-75.4; I² =42%) for CIN3+; specificity for <CIN2 was 73.8% (95%CI:59.8-84.2, I²=94%). Cytology was similarly variable (sensitivity of ASCUS+ for CIN2+ range: 58-100%; specificity: 9-96%). In 28 studies, sensitivity of tests targeting 14-HR-HPV types was high (91.6%, 95%CI:88.1-94.1; I²=45% for CIN2+ and 92.5%, 95%CI:88.4-95.2; I²=32%) for CIN3+); but specificity for <CIN2 was low (62.2% (95%CI:57.9-66.4;I²=92%). Restriction to 8-HR-HPV increased specificity (65.8%; Relative specificity[RSpec] vs. 14-HR-HPV=1.17; 95%CI:1.10-1.24) with no significant change in sensitivity (CIN2+:85.5%; Relative Sensitivity[RSens]=0.94, 95%CI: 0.89-1.00; CIN3+:90%; RSens=0.96, 95%CI:0.89-1.03). VIA triage of 14-HR-HPV positive women decreased sensitivity for CIN2+ compared to HPV-DNA test alone (64.4% vs. 91.6%; RSens=0.68, 95%CI:0.62-0.75).

INTERPRETATION

HPV-DNA based approaches consistently showed superior sensitivity for CIN2+/CIN3+ compared to VIA or cytology. The low specificity of HPV-DNA based methods targeting up to 14-HR-HPV could be improved significantly by restricting to 8-HR-HPV with only minor losses in sensitivity, limiting requirement for triage for which optimal approaches are less clear.

FUNDING

World Health Organisation; National Cancer Institute; European Union's Horizon 2020 and Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions programme.