Traumatic hollow viscus and mesenteric injury: role of CT and potential diagnostic-therapeutic algorithm

Imaging of Blunt Traumatic Bowel and Mesenteric Injuries

Traumatic injury is one of the leading causes of emergent hospital evaluations. Specifically, blunt bowel and mesenteric injury (BBMI) account for 1% to 5% of abdominal traumas with a high morbidity and mortality, as clinical signs and nonspecific imaging findings make the initial diagnosis challenging. Understanding key imaging findings and the clinical symptoms can increase the radiologist's suspicion for BBMI and ultimately improve patient outcomes.

Does time to operating room affect outcomes after pediatric blunt hollow viscus injury? A Trauma Quality Improvement Program analysis

BACKGROUND

Blunt hollow viscus injuries (HVIs) are relatively rare and difficult to diagnose. Whether a delay in operative intervention impacts outcomes for pediatric patients with blunt HVI has not been investigated via analysis of multicenter databases.

METHODS

We queried the Trauma Quality Improvement Program database from 2016 to 2020 for patients younger than 18 years who underwent an operation of the stomach, small intestine, large intestine, or rectum within 72 hours of emergency department arrival after blunt injury. We excluded patients with solid organ injury and additional extra-intestinal abdominal or thoracic operations. Patients were categorized by the time from emergency department presentation to operating room arrival: 1 to 5, 5 to 12, 12 to 24, and 24 to 72 hours. We analyzed baseline characteristics and outcomes between groups.

RESULTS

We identified 1,700 patients, including 147 (9%) who were operated on >24 hours after arrival. Patients with delayed operations demonstrated higher Injury Severity Scores and higher Abbreviated Injury Scale scores for the head, face, and upper extremities and were more likely to require an orthopedic operation. Patients who received a delayed operation were less likely to have full-thickness injury noted in the operating room and demonstrated longer hospital and intensive care unit stays. However, there was no difference in superficial surgical site infection (SSI), deep SSI, organ space SSI, severe sepsis, or mortality between groups.

CONCLUSION

Diagnosis and operative intervention for blunt HVI may be delayed in the presence of distracting injuries and in the absence of full-thickness perforation. While these patients typically have a more severe injury profile and require longer hospital stays, they do not appear to have increased rates of SSI, sepsis, or mortality.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic/Care Management; Level IV.

Effectiveness of syndecan-1 as an adjunct diagnostic marker in small bowel injury: a report of two cases

Background

Small bowel injuries are rare in trauma. Diagnosing these injuries is difficult owing to the lack of clear signs, and delays in diagnosis might increase complications and mortality. Trauma can damage the vascular endothelial glycocalyx, with syndecan-1 emerging as a marker of injury. Here, we describe two cases of small bowel injury due to traffic motor vehicle crash trauma.

Case presentation

The patients, one in their 40s and one teenaged, were transported to our hospital after a traffic motor vehicle crash. Both patients were wearing seat belts at the time of the motor vehicle crash, and the car's airbags deployed properly. Their vital signs were stable at admission, and non-operative treatment was selected. However, their abdominal pain did not improve, and based on posthospitalization CT reconstructive imaging, intra-abdominal hemorrhage was suspected. Surgery was performed, revealing small intestinal injuries. In both patients, a high serum syndecan-1 level in the blood test at admission was a common characteristic.

Conclusion

Increased serum syndecan-1 level was observed in blood tests during the initial treatment of small intestinal injuries in these patients, suggesting its potential utility in early diagnosis. However, further accumulation of cases and detailed studies are required to substantiate these results.

Contrast-enhanced CT scan (CECT) for the detection of hollow viscus and mesenteric injuries in blunt trauma - an updated systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy

BACKGROUND

Despite improved awareness of blunt traumatic hollow viscus and mesenteric injuries (THVMI), the accuracy of contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) varies considerably among studies. This systematic review and meta-analysis of test accuracy aims to explore the diagnostic performance of CECT in detecting THVMI in blunt trauma.

METHODS

The study was conducted according to the Cochrane recommendations searching the PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library datasets from 2000 to 8 September 2023 (PROSPERO ID: CRD42023473041). Surgical exploration, autopsy, and discharge from the hospital after monitoring were set as reference standard. To explore the diagnostic accuracy of CECT in detecting THVMI hierarchical models were developed. The risk of bias in individual studies was assessed with the QUADAS-2 tool. Sensitivity analysis was conducted to detect sources of heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Twelve studies, for a total of 4537 patients, were deemed eligible. After identification of outliers and sensitivity analysis, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, and diagnostic odds ratio were 0.85 (95% CI: 0.69-0.93), 0.94 (95% CI: 0.8-0.98), 14.65 (95% CI: 4.22-50.85), 0.16 (95% CI: 0.07-0.34), 92.3 (95% CI: 29.75-286.34), respectively. The Area under the HSROC curve was 0.95 (95% CI: 0.92-0.96). Meta-regression analysis identified the year of publication as a covariate significantly associated with heterogeneity. A high risk of bias was detected in the "patient selection" domains.

CONCLUSION

CECT has a fundamental role in identifying THVMI with high specificity but suboptimal sensitivity. Clinical criteria are still of paramount importance, especially in cases of ambiguous initial CECT images.

Blunt and Penetrating Injury to the Bowel: A Review

Traumatic injuries to the small and large bowel are common and can be highly morbid. Identifying these injuries, especially in stable patients who suffer blunt trauma, can be challenging. It is critical that traumatic bowel injuries are diagnosed in a timely fashion as delays in diagnosis and treatment are associated with worse outcomes. The literature outlining the management of traumatic bowel injuries is mostly comprised of retrospective data and case reports/series. We have compiled the existing literature and relevant guidelines into a single resource for providers who care for traumatically injured patients.

Contemporary diagnosis and management of colorectal injuries: What you need to know

ABSTRACT

Colorectal injuries are commonly encountered by trauma surgeons. The management of colorectal injuries has evolved significantly over the past several decades, beginning with wartime experience and subsequently refining with prospective randomized studies. Colon injuries were initially nonoperative, evolved toward fecal diversion for all, and then became anatomic based with resection and primary anastomosis with selective diversion, and now primary repair, resection with primary anastomosis, and delayed anastomosis after damage-control laparotomy are all commonplace. Rectal injuries were also initially considered nonoperative until diversion came into favor. Diversion in addition to direct repair, presacral drain placement, and distal rectal washout became the criterion standard for extraperitoneal rectal injuries until drainage and washout fell out of favor. Despite a large body of evidence, there remains a debate on the optimal management of some colorectal injuries. This article will focus on how to diagnose and manage colorectal injuries. The aim of this review is to provide an evidence-based summary of the contemporary diagnosis and management of colorectal injuries.

Impact of Pelvic Fracture on Patients with Blunt Bowel Mesenteric Injury: Is Immediate Laparotomy Warranted?

The management of blunt abdominopelvic trauma with combined hemoperitoneum and pelvic fractures is challenging for trauma surgeons. Although angioembolization can achieve hemostasis in most visceral organ injuries and pelvic fractures after blunt abdominal trauma, it cannot effectively control hemorrhage in patients with blunt bowel mesenteric injury (BBMI). This study aimed to determine the risk factors associated with hemodynamically unstable patients with BBMI and to test the hypothesis that pelvic fracture is an independent risk factor for patients with unstable BBMI and concomitant pelvic fracture to guide the therapeutic sequence for difficult-to-manage patients. This retrospective study reviewed the data of hospitalized patients with trauma between 2009 and 2021 and included 158 adult patients with surgically proven BBMI. The patients were divided on the basis of the presence of a shock episode before emergency laparotomy. The shock group included 44.3% of all patients in the study (n = 70). Clinical injury severity and prognosis for patients in the shock group were poorer than those for patients in the non-shock group, and more invasive treatments and transfusions were performed for patients in the shock group than for those in the non-shock group. Pelvic fractures were more frequently associated with the shock group than with the non-shock group (21.4% vs. 5.7%; p = 0.003). In multivariate analysis, the presence of intracerebral hemorrhage (odds ratio [OR] = 10.87, 95% confidence intervals [CIs]: 1.70-69.75) and rib fracture (OR = 5.94, 95% CIs = 1.06-33.45) was identified as an independent predictor of shock, whereas the effect of pelvic fracture did not achieve statistical significance (OR = 2.94, 95% CIs = 0.66-13.13) after adjusting for confounding factors. For patients with BBMI, outcomes need to be improved during early diagnosis, and treatments should be expeditiously performed on the basis of the rapid identification of unstable hemodynamic status. Our results support the recommendation of emergency laparotomy in unstable patients with concomitant pelvic fractures, followed by damage control TAE if needed.

Development and Validation of a Novel Hollow Viscus Injury Prediction Score for Abdominal Seatbelt Sign: A Pacific Coast Surgical Association Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

High-quality CT can exclude hollow viscus injury (HVI) in patients with abdominal seatbelt sign (SBS) but performs poorly at identifying HVI. Delay in diagnosis of HVI has significant consequences necessitating timely identification.

STUDY DESIGN

This multicenter, prospective observational study conducted at 9 trauma centers between August 2020 and October 2021 included adult trauma patients with abdominal SBS who underwent abdominal CT before surgery. HVI was determined intraoperatively and physiologic, examination, laboratory, and imaging findings were collected. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator- and probit regression-selected predictor variables and coefficients were used to assign integer points for the HVI score. Validation was performed by comparing the area under receiver operating curves (AUROC).

RESULTS

Analysis included 473 in the development set and 203 in the validation set. The HVI score includes initial systolic blood pressure <110 mmHg, abdominal tenderness, guarding, and select abdominal CT findings. The derivation set has an AUROC of 0.96, and the validation set has an AUROC of 0.91. The HVI score ranges from 0 to 17 with score 0 to 5 having an HVI risk of 0.03% to 5.36%, 6 to 9 having a risk of 10.65% to 44.1%, and 10 to 17 having a risk of 58.59% to 99.72%.

CONCLUSIONS

This multicenter study developed and validated a novel HVI score incorporating readily available physiologic, examination, and CT findings to risk stratify patients with an abdominal SBS. The HVI score can be used to guide decisions regarding management of a patient with an abdominal SBS and suspected HVI.

Blunt abdominal trauma: watch and wait

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review examines recent advancements in nonoperative management (NOM) of hemodynamically stable blunt abdominal trauma, focusing on expanding patient selection for observation-first strategies, particularly for high-grade solid organ injuries.

RECENT FINDINGS

Advances include a more deliberate nonoperative approach, allowing for broader patient inclusion in diagnostic and interventional angiography. Strict clinical monitoring and appropriate follow-up strategies are crucial to identify early signs of clinical progression and complications. Repeated contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) scan can be used for close observation of high-risk injuries, while the repetition of CECTs may be avoided for lower-risk cases, such as specific high-grade kidney injuries. The role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in detecting sequelae of nonoperative approaches is still debated and has lot of potential, with ongoing trials exploring possible advantages.

SUMMARY

Multidisciplinary trauma teams play a crucial role in nonoperative management, particularly for high-grade injuries. A careful selection of patients is essential to minimize failure rates. Complications of nonoperative and angiographic approaches should be managed according to local expertise.

The Role of Diagnostic Laparoscopy in the Evaluation of Abdominal Trauma Patients: A Trauma Quality Improvement Program Study

PURPOSE

We aimed to identify factors related to delayed intervention in abdominal trauma patients who underwent diagnostic laparoscopy using a nationwide databank.

METHODS

From 2017 to 2019, abdominal trauma patients who underwent diagnostic laparoscopy were retrospectively evaluated using the Trauma Quality Improvement Program. Patients who underwent delayed interventions after a primary diagnostic laparoscopy were compared with those who did not. Factors associated with poor outcomes that are usually correlated with overlooked injuries and delayed interventions were also analyzed.

RESULTS

Of the 5221 studied patients, 4682 (89.7%) underwent inspection without any intervention. Only 48 (0.9%) patients underwent delayed interventions after primary laparoscopy. Compared with patients receiving immediate interventions during primary diagnostic laparoscopy, patients receiving delayed interventions were more likely to have small intestine injuries (58.3% vs. 28.3%, p < 0.001). Among patients with hollow viscus injuries, a significantly higher probability of overlooked injuries that required delayed intervention was observed in patients with small intestine injuries (small intestine injury: 16.8%; gastric injury: 2.5%; large intestine injury: 5.2%). However, delayed small intestine repair did not significantly affect the risk of surgical site infection (SSI) (p = 0.249), acute kidney injury (AKI) (p = 0.998), or hospital length of stay (LOS) (p = 0.053). In contrast, significantly positive relationships between delayed large intestine repair and poor outcomes were observed (SSI, odds ratio = 19.544, p = 0.021; AKI, odds ratio = 27.368, p < 0.001; LOS, β = 13.541, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Most examinations and interventions (near 90%) were successful during primary laparoscopy for abdominal trauma patients. Small intestine injuries were easily overlooked. Delayed small intestine repair-related poor outcomes were not observed.

Radiologic Imaging of Traumatic Bowel and Mesenteric Injuries: A Comprehensive Up-to-Date Review

Diagnosing bowel and mesenteric trauma poses a significant challenge to radiologists. Although these injuries are relatively rare, immediate laparotomy may be indicated when they occur. Delayed diagnosis and treatment are associated with increased morbidity and mortality; therefore, timely and accurate management is essential. Additionally, employing strategies to differentiate between major injuries requiring surgical intervention and minor injuries considered manageable via non-operative management is important. Bowel and mesenteric injuries are among the most frequently overlooked injuries on trauma abdominal computed tomography (CT), with up to 40% of confirmed surgical bowel and mesenteric injuries not reported prior to operative treatment. This high percentage of falsely negative preoperative diagnoses may be due to several factors, including the relative rarity of these injuries, subtle and non-specific appearances on CT, and limited awareness of the injuries among radiologists. To improve the awareness and diagnosis of bowel and mesenteric injuries, this article provides an overview of the injuries most often encountered, imaging evaluation, CT appearances, and diagnostic pearls and pitfalls. Enhanced diagnostic imaging awareness will improve the preoperative diagnostic yield, which will save time, money, and lives.

Identifying Radiographic and Clinical Indicators to Reduce the Occurrence of Nontherapeutic Laparotomy for Blunt Bowel and Mesenteric Injury

BACKGROUND

Roughly 5% of patients with blunt abdominal trauma (BAT) have a blunt bowel and/or mesenteric injury (BBMI). Determining the need for operative management in these patients can be challenging when hemodynamically stable. Single center studies have proposed scoring systems based on CT findings to guide management. Our study aimed to determine the predictability of abdominopelvic CT scan (CT A/P) findings in conjunction with clinical exam to determine the necessity of operative intervention for BBMI.

METHODS

Patients presenting from 2017 to 2022 to the University of South Alabama Level 1 Trauma Center after motor vehicle collision were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with CT findings suggestive of BBMI were further analyzed, noting CT findings, Glasgow coma scale (GCS), shock index, abdominal exam, operative or nonoperative management, and intraoperative intervention.

RESULTS

1098 patients with BAT underwent CT A/P. 139 patients had ≥1 finding suggestive of BBMI. 38 patients underwent surgical exploration and 30 had surgically confirmed BBMI. 27 patients required intervention for BBMI. Univariate analysis indicated that pneumoperitoneum (p < 0.0001), active extravasation of contrast (p = 0.0001), hemoperitoneum without solid organ injury (SOI) (p < 0.0001), peritonitis (p < 0.0001), and mesenteric stranding(p < 0.05) were significantly associated with intervention.

CONCLUSION

In total, 30 patients had surgically confirmed BBMI. Active extravasation, pneumoperitoneum, hemoperitoneum without SOI, mesenteric stranding, and peritonitis were significant indicators of BBMI requiring intervention. CT and clinical findings cannot reliably predict the need for surgical intervention without ≥1 of these findings. Initial nonoperative management with serial clinical exams should be strongly considered to reduce incidence of nontherapeutic laparotomies.

Accuracy of CT Scan for Detecting Hollow Viscus Injury in Penetrating Abdominal Trauma

BACKGROUND

In penetrating abdominal trauma, computed tomography (CT) is routinely performed to evaluate stable patients for selective non-operative management (SNOM). Triple-contrast CT (oral, rectal, and IV) has traditionally been used. However, due to its disadvantages, most trauma centres, including our unit at the Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital (CMJAH), now perform single-contrast intravenous-only CT scans. We performed a retrospective review to determine the accuracy of single-contrast CT scans for detecting hollow viscus injuries (HVI) in penetrating abdominal trauma.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all patients who presented to CMJAH with penetrating abdominal injuries was performed between 01 August 2017 and 31 August 2019 and were evaluated for SNOM with CT (IV contrast only). Patient records were reviewed to determine pertinent demographics, mechanism, and site of injury, as well as metabolic parameters. CT findings were compared to findings at laparotomy.

RESULTS

A total of 437 patients met the inclusion criteria. The majority were male (92.7%), with a mean age of 31.5 yrs (SD 8.7). Injuries were predominantly due to stab wounds (72,5%, n = 317). CT scan was negative in 342 patients, of which 314 completed SNOM successfully. A total of 93 patients proceeded to laparotomy. CT had a sensitivity of 95.1%, specificity of 44.2%, positive predictive value of 57.4%, and negative predictive value of 92%.

CONCLUSION

Single-contrast CT in penetrating abdominal trauma is a valuable investigative tool in identifying patients for SNOM. Features of HVI on single-contrast CT are not very specific and should be interpreted along with other clinical factors including wound trajectory and serial abdominal examinations. Other associated injuries such as diaphragmatic and solid organ injuries should be considered in the final management plan.

BASE Jumping in the Lauterbrunnen Valley: A Retrospective Cohort Study from 2007 to 2016

BACKGROUND

BASE jumping, and especially BASE jumping with the help of wingsuits, is considered one of the most dangerous airborne sports. The valley of Lauterbrunnen in Switzerland has become infamous for the large number of BASE jumps and the high rate of accidents and fatalities. The aim of this study was to evaluate the morbidity and mortality of BASE jumping, to determine the severity of injuries and injury patterns of BASE jumping accidents and to compare preclinical assessment with clinical diagnoses to detect under- or overtriage.

METHODS

This retrospective, descriptive cohort study covers a period of 10 years (2007-2016). The evaluation covered all BASE jumping incidents in the valley of Lauterbrunnen that required either a helicopter mission by the local HEMS (Helicopter Emergency Medical Service) company of Lauterbrunnen, Air Glaciers, or medical care in the regional hospital, the level I trauma centre or the medical practice of the local general practitioner. Besides demographic data, experience in BASE jumping and skydiving as well as BASE jumping technique(s) and details about the rescue missions were collected. The medical data focused on the severity of injuries, as expressed by the National Advisory Committee of Aeronautics (NACA) score in the prehospital assessment as well as the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) and Injury Severity Score (ISS) retrieved from the clinical records in the hospital or medical practice setting.

RESULTS

The patients were predominantly young, experienced male BASE jumpers. Morbidity (injury risk) ranged from 0.05% to 0.2%, and fatality risk from 0.02% to 0.08%. Undertriage was low, with only two cases. Overtriage was significant, with 73.2% of all NACA 4-6 cases not qualifying for major trauma.

CONCLUSIONS

BASE jumping remains a high-risk sport and is associated with significant rates of injuries and fatalities. Comparison with previous studies indicated that the injury rate may have decreased, but the fatality rate had not. In this known BASE jumping environment, prehospital assessment appears to be good, as we found a low undertriage rate. The high overtriage rate might be an expression of physicians' awareness of high-velocity trauma mechanisms and possible deceleration injuries.

Utilization of Chest and Abdominopelvic CT for Traumatic Injury From 2011 to 2018: Evaluation Using a National Commercial Database

BACKGROUND. Increases in the use of CT to evaluate patients presenting with trauma have raised concern about inappropriate imaging. The evolving utilization of CT for trauma evaluation may be impacted by injury severity. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to explore patterns in utilization of chest and abdominopelvic CT among trauma-related emergency department (ED) visits across the United States. METHODS. This retrospective study was conducted with national commercial claims information extracted from the MarketScan Commercial Database. Trauma-related ED encounters were identified from the 2011-2018 MarketScan database files and classified by injury severity score (minor, intermediate, and major injuries) on the basis of International Classification of Diseases codes. ED encounters were also assessed for chest CT, abdominopelvic CT, and single-encounter chest and abdominopelvic CT examinations. Utilization per 1000 trauma-related ED encounters was determined. Multivariable Poisson regression models were used to determine incidence rate ratios (IRRs) as a measure of temporal changes in utilization. RESULTS. From 2011 to 2018, 8,369,092 trauma-related ED encounters were identified (5,685,295 for minor, 2,624,944 for intermediate, and 58,853 for major injuries). Utilization of chest CT per 1000 trauma-related ED encounters increased from 4.9 to 13.5 examinations (adjusted IRR, 1.15 per year; minor injuries, from 2.2 to 7.7 [adjusted IRR, 1.17]; intermediate injuries, from 8.5 to 21.5 [adjusted IRR, 1.16]; major injuries, from 117.8 to 200.1 [adjusted IRR, 1.08]). Utilization of abdominopelvic CT per 1000 trauma-related ED encounters increased from 7.5 to 16.4 (adjusted IRR, 1.12; minor injuries, 4.8 to 12.2 [adjusted IRR, 1.13]; intermediate injuries, 10.6 to 21.7 [adjusted IRR, 1.13]; major injuries, 134.8 to 192.6 [adjusted IRR, 1.07]). Utilization of single-encounter chest and abdominopelvic CT per 1000 trauma-related ED encounters increased from 3.4 to 8.9 [adjusted IRR, 1.16; minor injuries, 1.1 to 4.6 [adjusted IRR, 1.18]; intermediate injuries, 6.4 to 16.4 [adjusted IRR, 1.16]; major injuries, 99.6 to 179.9 [adjusted IRR, 1.08]). CONCLUSION. National utilization of chest and abdominopelvic CT for trauma-related ED encounters increased among commercially insured patients from 2011 to 2018, particularly for single-encounter chest and abdominopelvic CT examinations and for minor injuries. CLINICAL IMPACT. Given concerns about increased cost and detection of incidental findings, further investigation is warranted to explore the potential benefit of single-encounter chest and abdominopelvic CT examinations of patients with minor injuries and to develop strategies for optimizing appropriateness of imaging orders.

Late Presentation of Peritonitis Post Jejunal Perforation Due to Flank Stab Wound

Abdominal trauma injuries are caused by many mechanisms including blunt and penetrating trauma injuries. Penetrating injuries are far more common than blunt injuries. Subsequently, the most affected organ during such injuries is small intestine perforations. As far as we know, there were no cases reported before about jejunal injury due to penetrating trauma. We present a case of a 20-year-old male with a stab wound injury who was initially stable in the emergency department (ED). After a set of investigations were done, the patient was discharged home. Yet, the patient presented again with late signs of peritonitis. Imaging was done and showed pneumoperitoneum. Thereafter, the patient was rushed to the operation room (OR) where the jejunal repair was performed. ED physicians must be vigilant regarding any signs of deterioration in penetrating trauma patients and should provide clear instructions to patients regarding any symptoms of the acute abdomen before any discharge.

Use of minimally invasive surgery for the management of hollow viscus traumatic injuries

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study is to assess surgical outcomes following the initial use of laparoscopy versus laparotomy when managing patients with hollow viscus injuries due to trauma.

METHODS

Using the database from the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program we identified all patients from 2015-2017 with ICD-10 Diagnosis codes for hollow viscus trauma. Types of procedures were identified by ICD-10 PCS codes. Patient outcomes were stratified by major trauma(ISS > 15) and minor trauma. Continuous variables were compared by ANOVA and categorical variables compared by Chi-Square. Analysis performed using STATA 16.

RESULTS

We identified 16,284 patients that matched inclusion criteria within the study time frame. Of those, 1986 patients received a surgical intervention, 1911(96%) were open and 75(4%) were laparoscopic. In blunt trauma there were 106 diagnostic procedures, 87(82%) were open and 19(18%) were laparoscopic. There were 574 therapeutic procedures, 543(95%) were open and 31(5%) were laparoscopic. In penetrating trauma there were 223 diagnostic procedures, 215(96%) were open and 8(4%) were laparoscopic. There were 1039 therapeutic procedures for penetrating trauma, 1023(98%) were open and 16(2%) were laparoscopic. For minor trauma, mean length of stay(days) after open surgery was 5 while for laparoscopy it was 2 (p = 0.04). There were 203 complications noted in the open group and 7 in the laparoscopic group (p = 0.19). For major trauma, mean length of stay(days) after open surgery was 5 and 6 for laparoscopy p = 0.54). There were 242 complications in the open group and 1 in the laparoscopic group (p = 0.07). There was no noted significant difference noted in the disposition at discharge in either group in both major and minor trauma.

CONCLUSIONS

For those that required surgery for hollow viscous injury, laparoscopy appeared to be safe, had less adverse outcomes and was underutilized, particularly when only a diagnostic procedure was required.

Do signs of abdominal wall injury on computed tomography predict intra-abdominal injury in trauma patients with a seatbelt sign?

BACKGROUND

A seatbelt sign in patients with blunt abdominal injury is associated with both abdominal wall and intra-abdominal injuries. This study aimed to assess the association between signs of abdominal wall injury on computed tomography (CT) and rates of intra-abdominal injury in patients with a blunt abdominal injury and a clinical seatbelt sign.

METHODS

This study includes hemodynamically stable trauma patients with blunt abdominal injury and a clinical seatbelt sign who were hospitalized in two regional trauma centers in Israel, during 2014-2019. All data were collected via the medical center's trauma registry in both centers.

RESULTS

We identified 123 stable blunt abdominal trauma patients with a seatbelt sign, of which 101 (82.1%) and 22 (17.9%) had a low-grade and high-grade abdominal wall injury according to CT findings, respectively. Laparotomy rates were significantly higher in patients with signs of high-grade abdominal wall injury (p<0.0001). No differences in the timing of laparotomy between low and high-grade injuries were found.

CONCLUSIONS

In stable patients with blunt abdominal trauma and a clinical seatbelt sign, the severity of abdominal wall injury, as represented by CT findings, may predict a need for surgical treatment.

A Retrospective Cohort Study on the Clinical Characteristics of Patients with Surgical Blunt Bowel and/or Mesenteric Injuries among Motorcyclists and Car Occupants

(1) Background: Surgical blunt bowel and/or mesenteric injuries (BBMIs) are rare but challenging for trauma surgeons. Surgical BBMI is associated with specific injury mechanisms, such as direct compression by the handlebar in motorcycle accidents or rapid acceleration and deceleration of the impact forces associated with seatbelt injuries in motor vehicle collisions. However, the discussions on the implications of BBMI and the mechanisms of road traffic accidents remain scarce. This retrospective study assessed the clinical and injury characteristics of surgically proven BBMI among motorcyclists and car occupants based on trauma-registered data obtained from a level I trauma center in Taiwan. (2) Methods: Medical data of 72 motorcyclists and 38 car occupants who had surgical BBMI between January 2009 and December 2020 were reviewed. Patient characteristics, injuries, and outcomes in both groups were compared and analyzed. (3) Results: Motorcyclists with surgical BBMI had a significantly higher Injury Severity Score (median [Q1–Q3], 18 (9–27) vs. 16 (9–18), p = 0.044) and lower Glasgow Coma Scale score (15 (11–15) vs. 15 (15–15), p = 0.034]) than car occupants. Motorcyclists with surgical BBMI had a higher incidence of pelvic fractures (18.1% vs. 2.6%, p = 0.032) and upper limb fractures (23.6% vs. 7.9%, p = 0.042) and a significantly higher rate of chest tube insertion than car occupants (29.2% vs. 10.5%, p = 0.027). However, there were no significant differences in the outcomes of morbidity and mortality between motorcyclists and car occupants with surgical BBMI. (4) Conclusions: This study demonstrated there were no significant differences in outcomes between motorcyclists and car occupants with surgical BBMI. However, motorcyclists with surgical BBMI were injured more severely, along with injuries to the head/neck and extremities, than car occupants.

WSES guidelines on blunt and penetrating bowel injury: diagnosis, investigations, and treatment

The aim of this paper was to review the recent literature to create recommendations for the day-to-day diagnosis and surgical management of small bowel and colon injuries. Where knowledge gaps were identified, expert consensus was pursued during the 8th International Congress of the World Society of Emergency Surgery Annual (September 2021, Edinburgh). This process also aimed to guide future research.