Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Esaxerenone, a Novel Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist: A Review

Home blood pressure-lowering effect of esaxerenone vs trichlormethiazide for uncontrolled hypertension: a prespecified subanalysis of the EXCITE-HT randomized controlled study by age subgroup

This predefined subanalysis of the multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group EXCITE-HT study aimed to determine whether the comparative efficacy and safety of esaxerenone and trichlormethiazide differs with age. Patients were divided into two age subgroups (<65 and ≥65 years). The non-inferiority of esaxerenone to trichlormethiazide was assessed based on the upper limit of the two-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) for the difference in systolic/diastolic blood pressure (SBP/DBP) changes. Esaxerenone was considered non-inferior if this value was <3.9/ < 2.1 mmHg; if it was <0 mmHg, esaxerenone was considered superior in its BP-lowering effect. The results showed that the least squares mean changes in morning home SBP/DBP from baseline to the end of treatment (primary endpoint) were -9.5/-5.7 with esaxerenone and -8.2/-4.9 mmHg with trichloromethiazide (between-group difference: -1.3 [95% CI, -3.3, 0.8]/-0.8 [ - 2.1, 0.5] mmHg) in the subgroup aged <65 years. These changes were -14.6/-7.2 and -11.5/-6.7 (-3.0 [-4.9, -1.2]/-0.5 [-1.5, 0.5] mmHg) in the subgroup aged ≥65 years. The incidences of serum potassium level ≥5.5 mEq/L were 2.2% and 1.9% in the esaxerenone-treated subgroups aged <65 and ≥65 years, respectively. In conclusion, esaxerenone achieved the pre-defined non-inferiority margin to trichlormethiazide in its BP-lowering effect regardless of age. In patients aged <65 years, esaxerenone achieved the non-inferiority margin to trichlormethiazide in lowering both SBP and DBP. In patients aged ≥65 years, esaxerenone was superior to trichlormethiazide in lowering SBP and achieved the non-inferiority margin to trichlormethiazide in lowering DBP. The impact of esaxerenone on serum potassium levels did not show a specific age-related effect. A subgroup analysis of the EXCITE-HT study according to age (<65 and ≥65 years) showed that esaxerenone achieved the pre-defined non-inferiority margin to trichlormethiazide in its BP-lowering effect regardless of age. In patients aged ≥65 years, esaxerenone achieved the superiority margin to trichlormethiazide in lowering SBP.

Home blood pressure-lowering effect of esaxerenone versus trichlormethiazide for uncontrolled hypertension: a predefined subanalysis of the EXCITE-HT randomized controlled trial by basal calcium channel blocker versus angiotensin receptor blocker

This prespecified subanalysis of the multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group EXCITE-HT study aimed to examine the non-inferiority of esaxerenone to trichlormethiazide as a second-line antihypertensive agent according to the basal antihypertensive agent used (angiotensin receptor blocker [ARB] or calcium channel blocker [CCB]). The primary endpoint, change in morning home systolic/diastolic blood pressure (SBP/DBP) from baseline to end of treatment was similar between the two groups (intergroup difference in least squares mean change [95% confidence interval]: -1.3 [-3.8, 1.3]/-0.2 [-1.6, 1.3] mmHg for ARB; -2.7 [-4.2, -1.2]/-0.8 [-1.7, 0.1] mmHg for CCB). The respective incidences of serum potassium levels <3.5 mEq/L and ≥5.5 mEq/L in the ARB subgroup were 3.4% and 4.2% for esaxerenone and 7.9% and 0% for trichlormethiazide; in the CCB subgroup, they were 2.8% and 0.6% for esaxerenone and 13.9% and 1.2% for trichlormethiazide, respectively. The incidence of uric acid level ≥7.0 mg/dL was numerically higher in the trichlormethiazide group than the esaxerenone group in both the ARB and CCB subgroups. The non-inferiority of esaxerenone to trichlormethiazide in lowering morning home BP was demonstrated regardless of whether the basal antihypertensive agent was an ARB or CCB. Esaxerenone with a CCB showed superiority to trichlormethiazide in lowering SBP, without any new safety concerns. Serum potassium levels tended to be higher when esaxerenone was combined with an ARB than with a CCB, but this can be mitigated if administered according to the package insert. A subgroup analysis of the EXCITE-HT study according to basal antihypertensive agent demonstrated the non-inferiority of esaxerenone to trichlormethiazide in lowering morning home BP regardless irrespective of the basal antihypertensive agent. Esaxerenone with a CCB showed superiority to trichlormethiazide in lowering SBP, without any new safety concerns.

Rationale and Design of a Randomized, Open-Label, Parallel-Group Study of Esaxerenone Versus Angiotensin Receptor Blockers in Older Patients With Uncontrolled Hypertension on Calcium Channel Blocker Monotherapy (ESCORT-HT)

Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) and calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are commonly prescribed as first- and second-line treatments for older Japanese patients with hypertension. However, due to age-related decline in renin activity, the effectiveness of ARBs may decrease. This highlights the need for other antihypertensive agents to be used in combination with CCBs to replace ARBs for more effective blood pressure (BP) control. The ESCORT-HT study is a multicenter, randomized, controlled, open-label, parallel-group study with a 4-week run-in period and 12-week treatment period. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of esaxerenone as a second-line treatment for hypertension and to determine whether its BP-lowering effect is noninferior to that of ARBs in older patients with uncontrolled hypertension on CCB monotherapy. The safety profiles of esaxerenone and ARBs will also be evaluated. Patients will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either esaxerenone or an ARB. The primary efficacy endpoint will be the change from baseline in morning home systolic BP at the end of the treatment period. The BP-lowering effect of esaxerenone will be considered noninferior to that of ARBs if the upper limit of the two-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) for the difference in systolic BP change between esaxerenone and ARB is <3.8 mmHg, and will be considered superior if the upper limit of the two-sided 95% CI is <0. The findings may elucidate the possible benefits of earlier use of mineralocorticoid receptor blockers in combination with CCBs in older patients with essential hypertension.

Home blood pressure-lowering effect of a non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor blocker, esaxerenone, versus trichlormethiazide for uncontrolled hypertension: the EXCITE-HT randomized controlled study

The EXCITE-HT study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of esaxerenone versus thiazide diuretics (trichlormethiazide) as second-line treatment for Japanese patients with uncontrolled essential hypertension. This was a 12-week, multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group study. The non-inferiority of esaxerenone to trichlormethiazide was confirmed if the upper limit of the two-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) for the difference in systolic blood pressure (SBP)/diastolic blood pressure (DBP) change between groups was below 3.9/2.1 mmHg. A total of 295 and 290 patients were included in the esaxerenone and trichlormethiazide groups, respectively. The non-inferiority of esaxerenone to trichlormethiazide was demonstrated: least squares mean change differences in morning home SBP/DBP at end of treatment (EOT) were -2.2 (95% CI, -3.6, -0.8) mmHg for SBP/-0.6 (-1.4, 0.2) mmHg for DBP. Morning home, bedtime home, and office BP significantly decreased (all p < 0.001) from baseline to EOT in both groups. The urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide level decreased from baseline to Week 12 in both groups, with no notable intergroup difference. Serum potassium elevations occurred more frequently with esaxerenone, while serum potassium reductions occurred more with trichlormethiazide. Uric acid elevations were observed in both groups, but more frequently with trichlormethiazide than esaxerenone. No cases of gout occurred in this study. Reductions in estimated glomerular filtration rate were similarly observed in both groups. EXCITE-HT is the first randomized controlled study to demonstrate evidence that esaxerenone is non-inferior to trichlormethiazide as second-line treatment for Japanese patients with uncontrolled essential hypertension, with no new safety concerns. The EXCITE-HT study demonstrated the non-inferiority of esaxerenone to trichlormethiazide in its morning home blood pressure lowering effect and safety profile in Japanese patients with uncontrolled essential hypertension who were previously treated with an angiotensin II receptor blocker or calcium channel blocker.

Investigating the Impact of Selective Modulators on the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System: Unraveling Their Off-Target Perturbations of Transmembrane Ionic Currents

The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) plays a crucial role in maintaining various physiological processes in the body, including blood pressure regulation, electrolyte balance, and overall cardiovascular health. However, any compounds or drugs known to perturb the RAAS might have an additional impact on transmembrane ionic currents. In this retrospective review article, we aimed to present a selection of chemical compounds or medications that have long been recognized as interfering with the RAAS. It is noteworthy that these substances may also exhibit regulatory effects in different types of ionic currents. Apocynin, known to attenuate the angiotensin II-induced activation of epithelial Na+ channels, was shown to stimulate peak and late components of voltage-gated Na+ current (INa). Esaxerenone, an antagonist of the mineralocorticoid receptor, can exert an inhibitory effect on peak and late INa directly. Dexamethasone, a synthetic glucocorticoid, can directly enhance the open probability of large-conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channels. Sparsentan, a dual-acting antagonist of the angiotensin II receptor and endothelin type A receptors, was found to suppress the amplitude of peak and late INa effectively. However, telmisartan, a blocker of the angiotensin II receptor, was effective in stimulating the peak and late INa along with a slowing of the inactivation time course of the current. However, telmisartan's presence can also suppress the erg-mediated K+ current. Moreover, tolvaptan, recognized as an aquaretic agent that can block the vasopressin receptor, was noted to suppress the amplitude of the delayed-rectifier K+ current and the M-type K+ current directly. The above results indicate that these substances not only have an interference effect on the RAAS but also exert regulatory effects on different types of ionic currents. Therefore, to determine their mechanisms of action, it is necessary to gain a deeper understanding.

Results of the trycort: Cohort study of add-on antihypertensives for treatment of resistant hypertension

Although true treatment resistant hypertension is relatively rare (about 7.3% of all patients with hypertension), optimal control of blood pressure is not achieved in every other patient due to suboptimal treatment or nonadherence. The aim of this study was to compare effectiveness, safety and tolerability of various add-on treatment options in adult patients with treatment resistant hypertension The study was designed as multi-center, prospective observational cohort study, which compared effectiveness and safety of various add-on treatment options in adult patients with treatment resistant hypertension. Both office and home blood pressure measures were recorded at baseline and then every month for 6 visits. The study cohort was composed of 515 patients (268 females and 247 males), with average age of 64.7 ± 10.8 years. The patients were switched from initial add-on therapy to more effective ones at each study visit. The blood pressure measured both at office and home below 140/90 mm Hg was achieved in 80% of patients with add-on spironolactone, while 88% of patients taking this drug also achieved decrease of systolic blood pressure for more than 10 mm Hg from baseline, and diastolic blood pressure for more than 5 mm Hg from baseline. Effectiveness of centrally acting antihypertensives as add-on therapy was inferior, achieving the study endpoints in <70% of patients. Adverse drug reactions were reported in 9 patients (1.7%), none of them serious. Incidence rate of hyperkalemia with spironolactone was 0.44%, and gynecomastia was found in 1 patient (0.22%). In conclusion, the most effective and safe add-on therapy of resistant hypertension were spironolactone alone and combination of spironolactone and a centrally acting antihypertensive drug.

Network meta-analysis of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists for diabetic kidney disease

Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is one of the major causes of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). To evaluate the efficacy and safety of different types of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) in diabetic kidney disease patients, we conducted this network meta-analysis by performing a systematic search in PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and Clinicaltrials.gov. A total of 12 randomized clinical trials with 15,492 patients applying various types of MRAs covering spironolactone, eplerenone, finerenone, esaxerenone, and apararenone were included. The efficacy outcomes were the ratio of urine albumin creatine ratio (UACR) at posttreatment vs. at baseline, change in posttreatment estimated glomerular filtration (eGFR) vs. at baseline, and change in posttreatment systolic blood pressure (SBP) vs. at baseline. The safety outcome was the number of patients suffering from hyperkalemia. High-dose finerenone (MD −0.31, 95% CI: −0.52, −0.11), esaxerenone (MD −0.54, 95% CI: −0.72, −0.30), and apararenone (MD −0.63, 95% CI: −0.90, −0.35) were associated with a superior reduction in proteinuria in patients with DKD. Regarding the change in eGFR, the results of all drugs were similar, and finerenone may have potential superiority in protecting the kidney. Compared with placebo, none of the treatments was associated with a higher probability of controlling systolic blood pressure during treatment. Moreover, spironolactone, esaxerenone, and 20 mg of finerenone presented a higher risk of hyperkalemia. This Bayesian network meta-analysis was the first to explore the optimal alternative among MRAs in the treatment of DKD and revealed the superiority of 20 mg of finerenone among MRAs in treating DKD.

Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO, identifier (CRD42022313826)