1
|
Bali R, Ji-Xu A, Felton SJ. The significant health threat from sunbed use as a self treatment in patients with acne. Clin Exp Dermatol 2021; 47:404-406. [PMID: 34407228 DOI: 10.1111/ced.14899] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2021] [Revised: 07/28/2021] [Accepted: 08/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Patients with acne are increasingly using sunbeds as a self treatment despite the harmful effects. Little is known about sunbed use in adult patients with acne under dermatology care. This questionnaire study explored prevalence and behaviours surrounding sunbed use in patients with acne at a UK dermatology centre. Over a quarter (26%) of respondents used sunbeds and of these, 72% used them at least weekly. Respondents using sunbeds were more likely to be older, to be female, to have a longer duration of acne diagnosis and to have previously been offered blue-light therapy by their doctor (P < 0.05 for all) Reasons for use included recommendations from external sources (including the Internet), the perceived greater efficacy compared with physician-prescribed treatments and that light therapy was not offered by their doctor. Nearly half (49%) of respondents were taking isotretinoin at the time of sunbed use, which carries an increased risk for photosensitivity and sunburn in this cohort. Dermatologists have a responsibility to address this gap in public awareness by directly counselling patients at risk of sunbed use, particularly for those concomitantly prescribed oral retinoid therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Bali
- Department of Dermatology, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - A Ji-Xu
- Department of Dermatology, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - S J Felton
- Department of Dermatology, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Barros NDM, Sbroglio LL, Buffara MDO, Baka JLCES, Pessoa ADS, Azulay-Abulafia L. Phototherapy. An Bras Dermatol 2021; 96:397-407. [PMID: 33849754 PMCID: PMC8245715 DOI: 10.1016/j.abd.2021.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2019] [Accepted: 03/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Of all the therapeutic options available in Dermatology, few of them have the history, effectiveness, and safety of phototherapy. Heliotherapy, NB-UVB, PUVA, and UVA1 are currently the most common types of phototherapy used. Although psoriasis is the most frequent indication, it is used for atopic dermatitis, vitiligo, cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, and cutaneous sclerosis, among others. Before indicating phototherapy, a complete patient assessment should be performed. Possible contraindications should be actively searched for and it is essential to assess whether the patient can come to the treatment center at least twice a week. One of the main method limitations is the difficulty that patients have to attend the sessions. This therapy usually occurs in association with other treatments: topical or systemic medications. Maintaining the regular monitoring of the patient is essential to identify and treat possible adverse effects. Phototherapy is recognized for its benefits and should be considered whenever possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Norami de Moura Barros
- Department of Dermatology, Hospital Universitário Pedro Ernesto, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
| | - Lissiê Lunardi Sbroglio
- Department of Dermatology, Hospital Universitário Pedro Ernesto, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| | - Maria de Oliveira Buffara
- Department of Dermatology, Hospital Universitário Pedro Ernesto, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| | | | - Allen de Souza Pessoa
- Department of Dermatology, Hospital Universitário Pedro Ernesto, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| | - Luna Azulay-Abulafia
- Department of Dermatology, Hospital Universitário Pedro Ernesto, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Krenitsky A, Ghamrawi RI, Feldman SR. Phototherapy: a Review and Update of Treatment Options in Dermatology. CURRENT DERMATOLOGY REPORTS 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/s13671-020-00290-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
|
4
|
Niculiţe CM, Nechifor MT, Urs AO, Olariu L, Ceafalan LC, Leabu M. Keratinocyte Motility Is Affected by UVA Radiation-A Comparison between Normal and Dysplastic Cells. Int J Mol Sci 2018; 19:E1700. [PMID: 29880745 PMCID: PMC6032280 DOI: 10.3390/ijms19061700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2018] [Revised: 06/01/2018] [Accepted: 06/05/2018] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
UVA radiation induces multiple and complex changes in the skin, affecting epidermal cell behavior. This study reports the effects of UVA exposure on normal (HaCaT) and dysplastic (DOK) keratinocytes. The adherence, spreading and proliferation were investigated by time-lapse measurement of cell layer impedance on different matrix proteins. Prior to UVA exposure, the time required for adherence and spreading did not differ significantly for HaCaT and DOK cells, while spreading areas were larger for HaCaT cells. Under UVA exposure, HaCaT and DOK cells behavior differed in terms of movement and proliferation. The cells' ability to cover the denuded surface and individual cell trajectories were recorded by time-lapse videomicroscopy, during wound healing experiments. Dysplastic keratinocytes showed more sensitivity to UVA, exhibiting transient deficiencies in directionality of movement and a delay in re-coating the denuded area. The actin cytoskeleton displayed a cortical organization immediately after irradiation, in both cell lines, similar to mock-irradiated cells. Post-irradiation, DOK cells displayed a better organization of stress fibers, persistent filopodia, and new, stronger focal contacts. In conclusion, after UVA exposure HaCaT and DOK cells showed a different behavior in terms of adherence, spreading, motility, proliferation, and actin cytoskeleton dynamics, with the dyplastic keratinocytes being more sensitive.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina M Niculiţe
- Victor Babeș National Institute of Pathology, 99-101, Splaiul Independentei, 050096 Bucharest, Romania.
- Department of Morphological Sciences, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, 8, Blvd. Eroilor Sanitari, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.
| | - Marina T Nechifor
- Department of Anatomy, Animal Physiology and Biophysics, Faculty of Biology, University of Bucharest, 91-95, Splaiul Independentei, 050095 Bucharest, Romania.
| | - Andreea O Urs
- Victor Babeș National Institute of Pathology, 99-101, Splaiul Independentei, 050096 Bucharest, Romania.
| | - Laura Olariu
- SC Biotehnos SA, 3-5, Gorunului Street, 075100 Otopeni, Romania.
| | - Laura C Ceafalan
- Victor Babeș National Institute of Pathology, 99-101, Splaiul Independentei, 050096 Bucharest, Romania.
- Department of Morphological Sciences, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, 8, Blvd. Eroilor Sanitari, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.
| | - Mircea Leabu
- Victor Babeș National Institute of Pathology, 99-101, Splaiul Independentei, 050096 Bucharest, Romania.
- Department of Morphological Sciences, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, 8, Blvd. Eroilor Sanitari, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zhu H, Wang N, Yao L, Chen Q, Zhang R, Qian J, Hou Y, Guo W, Fan S, Liu S, Zhao Q, Du F, Zuo X, Guo Y, Xu Y, Li J, Xue T, Zhong K, Song X, Huang G, Xiong W. Moderate UV Exposure Enhances Learning and Memory by Promoting a Novel Glutamate Biosynthetic Pathway in the Brain. Cell 2018; 173:1716-1727.e17. [PMID: 29779945 DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.04.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 111] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2017] [Revised: 02/21/2018] [Accepted: 04/12/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Sunlight exposure is known to affect mood, learning, and cognition. However, the molecular and cellular mechanisms remain elusive. Here, we show that moderate UV exposure elevated blood urocanic acid (UCA), which then crossed the blood-brain barrier. Single-cell mass spectrometry and isotopic labeling revealed a novel intra-neuronal metabolic pathway converting UCA to glutamate (GLU) after UV exposure. This UV-triggered GLU synthesis promoted its packaging into synaptic vesicles and its release at glutamatergic terminals in the motor cortex and hippocampus. Related behaviors, like rotarod learning and object recognition memory, were enhanced after UV exposure. All UV-induced metabolic, electrophysiological, and behavioral effects could be reproduced by the intravenous injection of UCA and diminished by the application of inhibitor or short hairpin RNA (shRNA) against urocanase, an enzyme critical for the conversion of UCA to GLU. These findings reveal a new GLU biosynthetic pathway, which could contribute to some of the sunlight-induced neurobehavioral changes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongying Zhu
- Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at the Microscale, Neurodegenerative Disorder Research Center, School of Life Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, 230026 Hefei, China; Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at the Microscale, School of Chemistry and Materials Science, University of Science and Technology of China, 230026 Hefei, China
| | - Ning Wang
- Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at the Microscale, Neurodegenerative Disorder Research Center, School of Life Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, 230026 Hefei, China
| | - Lei Yao
- Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at the Microscale, Neurodegenerative Disorder Research Center, School of Life Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, 230026 Hefei, China
| | - Qi Chen
- Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at the Microscale, Neurodegenerative Disorder Research Center, School of Life Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, 230026 Hefei, China
| | - Ran Zhang
- Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at the Microscale, Neurodegenerative Disorder Research Center, School of Life Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, 230026 Hefei, China
| | - Junchao Qian
- High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 230031 Hefei, China
| | - Yiwen Hou
- Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at the Microscale, Neurodegenerative Disorder Research Center, School of Life Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, 230026 Hefei, China
| | - Weiwei Guo
- Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at the Microscale, Neurodegenerative Disorder Research Center, School of Life Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, 230026 Hefei, China
| | - Sijia Fan
- Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at the Microscale, Neurodegenerative Disorder Research Center, School of Life Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, 230026 Hefei, China
| | - Siling Liu
- Key Laboratory of Animal Models and Human Disease Mechanisms of Chinese Academy of Sciences & Yunnan Province, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 650223 Kunming, China
| | - Qiaoyun Zhao
- Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at the Microscale, Neurodegenerative Disorder Research Center, School of Life Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, 230026 Hefei, China
| | - Feng Du
- Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at the Microscale, Neurodegenerative Disorder Research Center, School of Life Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, 230026 Hefei, China
| | - Xin Zuo
- Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at the Microscale, Neurodegenerative Disorder Research Center, School of Life Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, 230026 Hefei, China
| | - Yujun Guo
- Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at the Microscale, Neurodegenerative Disorder Research Center, School of Life Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, 230026 Hefei, China
| | - Yan Xu
- Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at the Microscale, Neurodegenerative Disorder Research Center, School of Life Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, 230026 Hefei, China
| | - Jiali Li
- Key Laboratory of Animal Models and Human Disease Mechanisms of Chinese Academy of Sciences & Yunnan Province, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 650223 Kunming, China
| | - Tian Xue
- Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at the Microscale, Neurodegenerative Disorder Research Center, School of Life Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, 230026 Hefei, China; Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 200031 Shanghai, China
| | - Kai Zhong
- Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 200031 Shanghai, China; High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 230031 Hefei, China
| | - Xiaoyuan Song
- Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at the Microscale, Neurodegenerative Disorder Research Center, School of Life Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, 230026 Hefei, China
| | - Guangming Huang
- Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at the Microscale, School of Chemistry and Materials Science, University of Science and Technology of China, 230026 Hefei, China.
| | - Wei Xiong
- Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at the Microscale, Neurodegenerative Disorder Research Center, School of Life Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, 230026 Hefei, China; Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 200031 Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sampson BP, Secrest AM, Hansen CB, Geller AC. Examining Dermatologist Use and Opinions of Ultraviolet Radiation for Cosmetic and Medical Purposes. THE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND AESTHETIC DERMATOLOGY 2018; 11:41-46. [PMID: 29552275 PMCID: PMC5843361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The commercial tanning industry has opposed efforts to educate the public on the risks of tanning as well as attempts to restrict minors' access to tanning services. Despite a paucity of supporting literature, statements from the tanning industry claiming that dermatologists routinely use in-office phototherapy for cosmetic treatments and refer patients to tanning salons have successfully derailed and defeated legislation in many states. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate dermatologist referrals for ultraviolet radiation for cosmetic and medical purposes via tanning beds or phototherapy, as well as their opinions on tanning, legislation, and ultraviolet radiation counseling practices. DESIGN: The study was conducted using a 10-question anonymous survey. SETTING: The participants were surveyed during meetings of three regional dermatologic societies. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and fifty-two dermatologists attending society meetings participated in the study. MEASURES: The authors measured physician referrals, opinions, and recommendations regarding ultraviolet exposure. RESULTS: Zero physicians (0/152) recommended tanning salons for cosmetic reasons. These 152 dermatologists referred 458 (417 adult, 41 pediatric) out of an estimated 809,369 patients (0.057%) to tanning salons for medical treatment. Of these physicians, 76 out of 152 and 15 out of 152 reported referring at least one adult or one pediatric patient, respectively, within the last year. All respondents supported ultraviolet tanning legislation and discouraged cosmetic tanning. CONCLUSION: These findings directly contradict the assertion that dermatologists use ultraviolet radiation for cosmetic purposes or routinely refer patients to tanning salons. This study underscores the complex nature of ultraviolet radiation, as dermatologists infrequently utilize ultraviolet radiation for medical purposes and unanimously support restrictive legislation. In addition, these dermatologists counsel against cosmetic tanning and list tanning bed use among their highest concerns with regard to the health of pediatric patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Blake P Sampson
- Dr. Sampson is with Oregon Health & Sciences University in Portland, Oregon
- Drs. Secrest and Hansen are with the Department of Dermatology at the University of Utah in Salt Lake City, Utah
- Mr. Geller is with the Harvard T.H. Chan School Of Public Health in Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Aaron M Secrest
- Dr. Sampson is with Oregon Health & Sciences University in Portland, Oregon
- Drs. Secrest and Hansen are with the Department of Dermatology at the University of Utah in Salt Lake City, Utah
- Mr. Geller is with the Harvard T.H. Chan School Of Public Health in Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Christopher B Hansen
- Dr. Sampson is with Oregon Health & Sciences University in Portland, Oregon
- Drs. Secrest and Hansen are with the Department of Dermatology at the University of Utah in Salt Lake City, Utah
- Mr. Geller is with the Harvard T.H. Chan School Of Public Health in Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Alan C Geller
- Dr. Sampson is with Oregon Health & Sciences University in Portland, Oregon
- Drs. Secrest and Hansen are with the Department of Dermatology at the University of Utah in Salt Lake City, Utah
- Mr. Geller is with the Harvard T.H. Chan School Of Public Health in Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
Despite it is now undeniable that indoor tanning exposure is associated with a number of skin cancers, its favorable effects on vitamin D status may bear some underestimated and currently unexplored health benefits. Vitamin D is a fat-soluble vitamin naturally present in a limited number of foods, the concentration of which largely depends on ultraviolet (UV) B sources exposure in humans. A strong, graded, and inverse association has been documented between serum vitamin D and the risk of developing certain types of malignancy, especially colorectal, breast, lung, bladder, and kidney cancers. The overall mortality from any type of cancer is also apparently lower in subjects with increased values of serum vitamin D. Both genomic and nongenomic mechanisms have been identified to support the anticancer effects of vitamin D. Notably, UVB radiation emitted from indoor tanning devices is effective to linearly increase the serum vitamin D concentration, up to twofold. Therefore, some favorable effects against the risk of developing many human diseases, including nonskin cancers, cannot be excluded at first glance, although they may not be only linked to vitamin D status. Further large, prospective or randomized studies should be hence planned to definitely establish whether the unfavorable effects of indoor tanning exposure on skin cancers may be outweighed by the still unexplored benefits attributable to amelioration of vitamin D status.
Collapse
|
8
|
|
9
|
Hoffman MB, Hill D, Feldman SR. Current challenges and emerging drug delivery strategies for the treatment of psoriasis. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 2016; 13:1461-73. [PMID: 27164301 DOI: 10.1080/17425247.2016.1188801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Psoriasis is a common skin disorder associated with physical, social, psychological and financial burden. Over the past two decades, advances in our understanding of pathogenesis and increased appreciation for the multifaceted burden of psoriasis has led to new treatment development and better patient outcomes. Yet, surveys demonstrate that many psoriasis patients are either undertreated or are dissatisfied with treatment. There are many barriers that need be overcome to optimize patient outcomes and satisfaction. AREAS COVERED This review covers the current challenges associated with each major psoriasis treatment strategy (topical, phototherapy, oral medications and biologics). It also reviews the challenges associated with the psychosocial aspects of the disease and how they affect treatment outcomes. Patient adherence, inconvenience, high costs, and drug toxicities are all discussed. Then, we review the emerging drug delivery strategies in topical, oral, and biologic therapy. EXPERT OPINION By outlining current treatment challenges and emerging drug delivery strategies, we hope to highlight the deficits in psoriasis treatment and strategies for how to overcome them. Regardless of disease severity, clinicians should use a patient-centered approach. In all cases, we need to balance patients' psychosocial needs, treatment costs, convenience, and effectiveness with patients' preferences in order to optimize treatment outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa B Hoffman
- a Center for Dermatology Research, Department of Dermatology , Wake Forest School of Medicine , Winston-Salem , NC , USA
| | - Dane Hill
- a Center for Dermatology Research, Department of Dermatology , Wake Forest School of Medicine , Winston-Salem , NC , USA
| | - Steven R Feldman
- a Center for Dermatology Research, Department of Dermatology , Wake Forest School of Medicine , Winston-Salem , NC , USA.,b Department of Pathology , Wake Forest School of Medicine , Winston-Salem , NC , USA.,c Department of Public Health Sciences , Wake Forest School of Medicine , Winston-Salem , NC , USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Curnow A, Owen SJ. An Evaluation of Root Phytochemicals Derived from Althea officinalis (Marshmallow) and Astragalus membranaceus as Potential Natural Components of UV Protecting Dermatological Formulations. OXIDATIVE MEDICINE AND CELLULAR LONGEVITY 2016; 2016:7053897. [PMID: 26953144 PMCID: PMC4756206 DOI: 10.1155/2016/7053897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2015] [Revised: 01/02/2016] [Accepted: 01/10/2016] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
As lifetime exposure to ultraviolet (UV) radiation has risen, the deleterious effects have also become more apparent. Numerous sunscreen and skincare products have therefore been developed to help reduce the occurrence of sunburn, photoageing, and skin carcinogenesis. This has stimulated research into identifying new natural sources of effective skin protecting compounds. Alkaline single-cell gel electrophoresis (comet assay) was employed to assess aqueous extracts derived from soil or hydroponically glasshouse-grown roots of Althea officinalis (Marshmallow) and Astragalus membranaceus, compared with commercial, field-grown roots. Hydroponically grown root extracts from both plant species were found to significantly reduce UVA-induced DNA damage in cultured human lung and skin fibroblasts, although initial Astragalus experimentation detected some genotoxic effects, indicating that Althea root extracts may be better suited as potential constituents of dermatological formulations. Glasshouse-grown soil and hydroponic Althea root extracts afforded lung fibroblasts with statistically significant protection against UVA irradiation for a greater period of time than the commercial field-grown roots. No significant reduction in DNA damage was observed when total ultraviolet irradiation (including UVB) was employed (data not shown), indicating that the extracted phytochemicals predominantly protected against indirect UVA-induced oxidative stress. Althea phytochemical root extracts may therefore be useful components in dermatological formulations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alison Curnow
- Clinical Photobiology, European Centre for Environment and Human Health, University of Exeter Medical School, Knowledge Spa, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Truro, Cornwall TR1 3HD, UK
| | - Sara J. Owen
- Clinical Photobiology, European Centre for Environment and Human Health, University of Exeter Medical School, Knowledge Spa, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Truro, Cornwall TR1 3HD, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Vangipuram R, Feldman SR. Ultraviolet phototherapy for cutaneous diseases: a concise review. Oral Dis 2015; 22:253-9. [PMID: 26464123 DOI: 10.1111/odi.12366] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2015] [Accepted: 08/13/2015] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Phototherapy is the use of non-ionizing radiation, primarily in the ultraviolet spectrum, to treat disease. In dermatology, ultraviolet (UV) phototherapy remains an established, lower cost, and often preferred option for many common skin conditions, despite the introduction of newer potent biologics. This article introduces a principal therapeutic modality in the treatment of psoriasis, atopic dermatitis (eczema), vitiligo, and morphea among other diseases where oral manifestations may be present, providing basic information about the use of UVA, UVB, and PUVA. Practical considerations and side effects of phototherapy are described. Phototherapy is an effective treatment for many illnesses and carries a relatively benign side-effect profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Vangipuram
- University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - S R Feldman
- Department of Dermatology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|