Treatments of gliosarcoma of the brain: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Primary Intracranial Gliosarcoma: Is It Really a Variant of Glioblastoma? An Update of the Clinical, Radiological, and Biomolecular Characteristics

Gliosarcomas (GS) are sporadic malignant tumors classified as a Glioblastoma (GBM) variant with IDH-wild type phenotype. It appears as a well-circumscribed lesion with a biphasic, glial, and metaplastic mesenchymal component. The current knowledge about GS comes from the limited literature. Furthermore, recent studies describe peculiar characteristics of GS, such as hypothesizing that it could be a clinical-pathological entity different from GBM. Here, we review radiological, biomolecular, and clinical data to describe the peculiar characteristics of PGS, treatment options, and outcomes in light of the most recent literature. A comprehensive literature review of PubMed and Web of Science databases was conducted for articles written in English focused on gliosarcoma until 2023. We include relevant data from a few case series and only a single meta-analysis. Recent evidence describes peculiar characteristics of PGS, suggesting that it might be a specific clinical-pathological entity different from GBM. This review facilitates our understanding of this rare malignant brain tumor. However, in the future we recommend multi-center studies and large-scale metanalyses to clarify the biomolecular pathways of PGS to develop new specific therapeutic protocols, different from conventional GBM therapy in light of the new therapeutic opportunities.

Clinicopathological and Neuroimaging Features of Primary Gliosarcoma: A Case Series and Review of Literature

BACKGROUND

Gliosarcoma (GS) is a rare primary high-grade brain neoplasm with a poor prognosis and challenging surgical resection. Although it is now considered a morphologic variant of IDH-wildtype glioblastoma (World Health Organization Classification of Tumours 2021), GS may display peculiarities that hamper both surgical and oncological management.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we searched our registry for histologically confirmed GS patients between 2006 and 2020. Cases were reviewed for clinical information, pathologic characteristics, imaging findings, management, and outcome.

RESULTS

21 patients with histologically confirmed GS were identified with a median age of 62 years. Twelve were men and 9 women. The temporal lobe was the most common location (9 patients, 42.9%). Nineteen patients underwent surgical resection, and only 4 (19%) demonstrated gross total resection on postsurgical MRI, with an overall median survival of 7 months (range, 0.5-37). Diagnostic MRI demonstrated heterogenous lesions with necrotic-cystic areas and a ring-enhancement pattern. Only 1 case of extracranial extension was seen in our sample, and no patient showed distant metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

The rarity of primary GS and the absence of specific therapeutic guidelines represent a significant clinical challenge. Our study provides a comprehensive analysis of clinical and neuroimaging characteristics in a real-world patient cohort and compares our findings with the available literature.

Prognostic Factors of Gliosarcoma in the Real World: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Purpose

Gliosarcoma is a histopathological variant of glioblastoma, which is characterized by a biphasic growth pattern consisting of glial and sarcoma components. Owing to its scarcity, data regarding the impact of available treatments on the clinical outcomes of gliosarcoma are inadequate. The purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to analyze the prognostic factors of gliosarcoma.

Methods

By screening the clinical database of neurosurgical cases at a single center, patients with gliosarcoma diagnosed histologically from 2013 to 2021 were identified. Clinical, pathological, and molecular data were gathered founded on medical records and follow-up interviews. Prognostic factors were derived using the Cox proportional hazards model with backward stepwise regression analysis.

Results

Forty-five GSM patients were included. Median overall survival was 25.6 months (95% CI 8.0-43.1), and median relapse-free survival was 15.2 months (95% CI 9.7-20.8). In multivariable analysis, total resection (p = 0.023, HR = 0.192, 95% CI 0.046-0.797) indicated an improved prognosis. And low expression of Ki-67 (p = 0.059, HR = 2.803, 95% CI 0.963-8.162) would be likely to show statistical significance. However, there might be no statistically significant survival benefit from radiotherapy with concurrent temozolomide (n = 33, 73.3%, log-rank p = 0.99) or adjuvant temozolomide (n = 32, 71.1%, log-rank p = 0.74).

Conclusion

This single-center retrospective study with a limited cohort size has demonstrated the treatment of gross total resection and low expression of Ki-67 which are beneficial for patients with GSM, while radiotherapy or temozolomide is not.

Survival outcomes associated with MGMT promoter methylation and temozolomide in gliosarcoma patients

PURPOSE

Gliosarcoma is an uncommon glioblastoma subtype, for which MGMT promoter methylation's relationship with response to temozolomide chemotherapy is unclear. We therefore examined this question using a national cohort.

METHODS

 The National Cancer Database was queried for patients histopathologically diagnosed with gliosarcoma between 2010 and 2019. The associations between MGMT promoter methylation, first-line single-agent chemotherapy-presumed to be temozolomide herein-and overall survival (OS) were examined using log-rank tests and Cox regression, with correction for multiple testing (p < 0.01 was significant).

RESULTS

580 newly-diagnosed gliosarcoma patients with MGMT status were available, among whom 33.6% were MGMT promoter methylated. Median OS for gliosarcoma patients that received standard-of-care temozolomide and radiotherapy was 12.1 months (99% confidence interval [CI] 10.8-15.1) for MGMT promoter unmethylated and 21.4 months (99% CI 15.4-26.2) for MGMT promoter methylated gliosarcomas (p = 0.003). In multivariable analysis of gliosarcoma patients-which included the potential confounders of age, sex, maximal tumor size, extent of resection, and radiotherapy-receipt of temozolomide was associated with improved OS in both MGMT promoter methylated (hazard ratio [HR] 0.23 vs. no temozolomide, 99% CI 0.11-0.47, p < 0.001) and unmethylated (HR 0.50 vs. no temozolomide, 99% CI 0.29-0.89, p = 0.002) gliosarcomas. MGMT promoter methylation was associated with improved OS among temozolomide-treated gliosarcoma patients (p < 0.001), but not in patients who did not receive chemotherapy (p = 0.35).

CONCLUSION

In a national analysis of gliosarcoma patients, temozolomide was associated with prolonged OS irrespective of MGMT status. These results provide support for the current practice of trimodal therapy for gliosarcoma.