Prevalence of integrase inhibitor resistance mutations in Austrian patients recently diagnosed with HIV from 2008 to 2013

Characterization of Human Immunodeficiency Virus-1 Transmission Clusters and Transmitted Drug-Resistant Mutations in Croatia from 2019 to 2022

Molecular epidemiology of HIV-1 infection is challenging due to the highly diverse HIV-genome. We investigated the genetic diversity and prevalence of transmitted drug resistance (TDR) followed by phylogenetic analysis in 270 HIV-1 infected, treatment-naïve individuals from Croatia in the period 2019-2022. The results of this research confirmed a high overall prevalence of TDR of 16.7%. Resistance to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), non-nucleoside RTIs (NNRTIs), and protease inhibitors (PIs) was found in 9.6%, 7.4%, and 1.5% of persons, respectively. No resistance to integrase strand-transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) was found. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that 173/229 sequences (75.5%) were part of transmission clusters, and the largest identified was T215S, consisting of 45 sequences. Forward transmission was confirmed in several clusters. We compared deep sequencing (DS) with Sanger sequencing (SS) on 60 randomly selected samples and identified additional surveillance drug resistance mutations (SDRMs) in 49 of them. Our data highlight the need for baseline resistance testing in treatment-naïve persons. Although no major INSTIs were found, monitoring of SDRMs to INSTIs should be continued due to the extensive use of first- and second-generation INSTIs.

Preliminary report of transmitted drug resistance to integrase strand chain transfer inhibitors in treatment-naïve HIV infected patients

Transmitted Resistance exists in a newly diagnosed person who has not yet started their treatment. Our objective was to obtain a profile of HIV-1 resistance to integrase inhibitors in newly diagnosed treatment-naïve patients. Fifty people newly diagnosed with HIV-1 infection who had never received antiretroviral treatment were recruited. The complete integrase gene was amplified by nested RTPCR and the sequences obtained were analyzed with the ReCall and HIVdb v9.0. The overall prevalence transmitted due to mutations with some impact on integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTI) activity during the study period was 8%. The major E138K mutation was detected in only 1 patient and the secondary G163R mutation was detected in the other 3. The transmitted resistance for the first generation INSTI was 8% and for the second generation it was 0%. In Chile the resistance transmitted to INSTI is low and it is in according values detect in other part of the world.

Prevalence of resistance mutations associated with integrase inhibitors in therapy-naive HIV-positive patients in Baoding, Hebei province, China

Antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimens containing integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) are the recommended treatment for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-infected patients in the most recent guidelines in China. In this study, we investigated INSTI resistance mutations in newly diagnosed therapy-naive HIV-positive patients in Baoding City, Hebei Province (China) to provide guidance for implementing routine INSTI-associated HIV-1 genotypic resistance testing. Plasma samples were collected from HIV-1-infected patients without treatment at Baoding People’s Hospital from January 2020 to December 2021. The part of HIV-1 pol gene encoding integrase was amplified, sequenced, and analyzed for INSTI resistance. Clinical data including demographic data, CD4⁺ T cell counts, HIV-RNA loads, and resistance mutations were collected. Treatment-naïve HIV-1 patients (n = 131) were enrolled. We identified ten genotypes, and the predominant genotype was CRF01_AE in 67 patients (51.15%), CRF07_ BC in 39 patients (29.77%), subtype B in 11 patients (8.40%), and other subtypes (CRF68_01B, 3.82%; CRF55_01B, 1.53%, CRF80_0107, 1.53%; URFs 1.53%; and CRF103_01B, CRF59_01B, and CRF65_cpx, 1.4% each). Four major (E138A, R263k, G140S, and S147G) and three accessory (H51Y, Q146QL, and S153F) INSTI-resistance mutations were observed (genotype CRF01_AE, three patients; genotype B, one patient; and genotype CRF07_BC, one patient), resulting in different degrees of resistance to the following five INSTIs: raltegravir, elvitegravir, dolutegravir, bictegravir, and cabotegravir. The overall resistance rate was 3.82% (5/131). All INSTI-resistant strains were cross-resistant. The primary INSTI drug resistance rate among newly diagnosed HIV-infected patients in Baoding was low, but monitoring and research on HIV INSTI resistance should be strengthened in Baoding because INSTI-based regimen prescriptions are anticipated to increase in the near future.

Prevalence of integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTIs) resistance mutations in Henan Province, China (2018-2020)

BACKGROUND

Antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimens containing integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) have become the recommended treatment for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-infected patients in the updated guidelines in China. In this study, we investigated the prevalence of acquired and transmitted INSTI-associated resistance of HIV-1 strains in the Henan Province (China) to provide guidance on the implementation of routine INSTI-associated HIV-1 genotypic resistance testing.

METHODS

Serum samples from HIV-1-infected patients seeking treatment in our hospital from August 2018 to December 2020 were collected and the HIV-1 integrase gene coding sequence was amplified, sequenced and analyzed for INSTI resistance.

RESULTS

We obtained integrase sequence data from a total of 999 HIV-1-infected patients, including 474 ART-naive patients, 438 ART-treated patients, and 87 patients with unknown treatment history. We detected INSTI resistance in 12 patients (1.2%, 12/999) of the study group, which included 9 ART-treated patients (2.05%, 9/438), with 6 being INSTI-treated (14.63%, 6/41) and 3 INSTI-naive (0.76%, 3/397) and 3 ART-naive (0.63%, 3/474) patients. The most common major resistance mutation was E138AK (0.5%, 5/999), while the most common accessory resistance mutation was E157Q (1.8%, 18/999). Phylogenetic analysis based on the HIV-1 integrase gene indicated that INSTI resistance was primarily detected in patients infected with HIV-1 subtype B.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, our study reveals that INSTI resistance is observed in INSTI-treated patients, as expected, and the prevalence of INSTI resistance in ART-naive patients in Henan Province is low. However, baseline INSTI resistance testing should be considered, as the prescription of INSTI-based regimens is anticipated to increase considerably in the near future.

Prevalence of resistance mutations associated with integrase inhibitors in therapy-naive HIV-positive patients in Hungary

Widespread introduction of HIV integrase inhibitors into clinical care may result in appearance of drug resistance mutations affecting treatment outcome. The aim of our study was to monitor the resistance patterns of integrase inhibitors beside protease and reverse transcriptase inhibitors in newly diagnosed therapy-naive HIV-positive patients in Hungary between 2017 and 2019.Genotype-based resistance testing of HIV integrase, protease and reverse transcriptase was performed by amplification and Sanger population sequencing from plasma samples. Drug resistance mutations were identified by the algorithm of Stanford HIV Drug Resistance Database.Potentially transmitted, non-polymorphic integrase major mutation was detected in 1 out of 249 samples, while accessory mutations were observed in further 31 patients (12.4%). The overall prevalence of transmitted drug resistance (TDR) mutations related to protease and reverse transcriptase inhibitors was 5.8% (10/173) between the end of 2017 and 2019. Nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor associated resistance mutations were the most frequent indicators of TDR (6/173; 3.5%), followed by resistance mutations associated with protease (3/173; 1.7%) and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (2/173, 1.2%).The first detection of integrase major mutation and the changing patterns of other resistance mutations in Hungarian untreated HIV-positive population indicate the necessity of continuous molecular surveillance of Hungarian HIV epidemic.

Dolutegravir Plus Lamivudine Two-Drug Regimen: Safety, Efficacy and Diagnostic Considerations for Its Use in Real-Life Clinical Practice-A Refined Approach in the COVID-19 Era

The diagnostic and therapeutic management of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in the HIV population brought some known criticalities (and opportunities) to the forefront, for both those who are facing their first therapeutic line today, and for those already well viro-suppressed. The clinical, socioeconomic, and psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic should not affect the long-term care of people living with HIV, which creates an urgent need to optimize the diagnostic and treatment approach to the first-line or switch regimens. The use of dolutegravir plus a lamivudine two-drug regimen is one of the most promising solutions to ease the management of HIV treatment in this difficult period. In this review, we report the most salient features related to the use of this regimen from real-life cohorts, meta-analyses, randomized clinical trials, and studies presented at international conferences up to March 2021. We focused on the diagnostic and clinical-management implications of its use in real life, and how these comply with the contingent historical situation. The issue of the timing and type of diagnostic procedures and the relevance of classical diagnostic tests (such as genotype for resistance detection) is also discussed. According to the currently available results, dolutegravir plus a lamivudine two-drug regimen represents an outstanding tool, whose expected advantages fulfill the current requirements for optimal daily care of our HIV patients.

Low Frequency of Integrase Inhibitor Resistance Mutations Among Therapy-Naïve HIV Patients in Southeast China

BACKGROUND

With the widespread use of integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) in the clinical setting, transmission of INSTIs-resistance mutations may increase. Data regarding transmitted drug resistance mutations (TDRM) to INSTIs in Chinese HIV patients are limited. The aim of this study was to summarize the INSTIs TDRM, including the frequency of protease inhibitors (PIs) and reverse transcriptase (RT) inhibitors (RTIs) mutations in treatment-naïve patients in Southeast China.

METHODS

HIV-1 positive patients were retrospectively selected between April 2018 and October 2020 from the Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital of Fujian Medical University, the largest designated HIV/AIDS care hospital in Southeast China. Individuals who were antiretroviral therapy-naïve and received antiretroviral drug resistance testing at baseline were included. Clinical data including demographic data, CD4 counts, HIV-RNA loads, and drug resistance mutations were collected.

RESULTS

A total of 147 patients were enrolled. INSTIs TDRM was rare, with only one primary integrase mutation E138K observed in one sample and one secondary mutation E157Q detected in another sample. The overall prevalence of INSTIs TDRM was 1.36%. A substantial proportion of patients harbored common INSTIs-associated polymorphic variants. Two samples harbored the T215S, M184V and K70E mutations related to nucleoside RTIs (NRTIs). Twelve patients carried nonnucleoside RTIs (NNRTIs)-resistance mutations. Two individuals harbored PIs-resistance mutations: Q58E in one patient and M46I, I54V, V82A, L10F, and Q58E mutations in another patient. The total TDRM rate for RTIs and PIs was 10.20% (15/147), but only 0.68% (1/147) was according to the WHO recommendations on TDRM.

CONCLUSION

The rate of INSTIs TDRM was low among therapy-naïve HIV patients in Southeast China. INSTIs as a first-line regimen are suitable for untreated HIV-1 patients in Southeast China. But special attention must be still paid to INSTIs TDRM in clinical practice.

Predictors of virological failure and time to viral suppression of first line integrase inhibitor based antiretroviral treatment

Background

Integrase strand transfer inhibitors (InSTIs) are recommended for first-line treatment of persons with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). We identified risk factors, including baseline minor InSTI resistance mutations, for treatment failure of InSTI-based regimens.

Methods

We studied time-to-treatment failure and time to viral suppression among 1419 drug-naive patients in the Swiss HIV Cohort Study. We performed Cox regression models adjusted for demographic factors, baseline HIV RNA/CD4 cell counts, AIDS-defining events, and the type of InSTI. In 646 patients with a baseline genotypic resistance test of the integrase, we studied the impact of minor integrase resistance mutations.

Results

We observed 121 virological failures during 18 447 person-years of follow-up. A baseline viral load ≥100 000 copies/mL (multivariable hazard ratio [mHR], 2.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3–3.6) and an AIDS-defining event (mHR, 1.8; 95% CI. 1.1–3.0) were associated with treatment failure. CD4 counts between 200 and 500 cells/µL (mHR, 0.5; 95% CI, .3–.8) and >500 cells/µL (mHR, 0.4; 95% CI, .2–.7) were protective. Time to suppression was shorter in lower viral load strata (mHR, 0.7; 95% CI, .6–.8) and in dolutegravir-based therapy (mHR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.0–1.4). Minor resistance mutations were found at baseline in 104 of 646 (16%) patients with no effect on treatment outcome.

Conclusions

Factors associated with treatment failure on InSTI-based first-line regimen remained similar to those of older treatments, in particular high viral load and low CD4 counts.

High effectiveness of recommended first-line antiretroviral therapies in Germany: a nationwide, prospective cohort study

PURPOSE

Current German/Austrian antiretroviral treatment guidelines recommend more than 20 combination regimens for first-line therapy, without a preference. Regimens include two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) plus either an integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI), a non-NRTI (NNRTI) or a boosted protease inhibitor (PI). The objective was to examine the outcomes of recommended first-line ART in Germany.

METHODS

This nationwide observational study included treatment-naïve chronically HIV-1 infected patients receiving one of the recommended first-line regimens. Patients were allocated to three arms (INSTI, NNRTI, PI) and were prospectively followed for 24 months. Delayed treatment initiation was defined by a baseline CD4 T-cell count of < 350/µl or CDC clinical stage C.

RESULTS

Among a total of 434 patients enrolled, virologic failure was rare and occurred in 4.3% (6/141) in the PI arm, in 3.3% (4/122) in the NNRTI arm and in 0.6% (1/171) in the INSTI arm (p = 0.10). De novo drug resistance mutations developed in only two patients in the NNRTI arm. Nonetheless, treatment modifications were frequent (51%) and mostly performed for strategic reasons. Retention on all initial compounds at month 24 was 64%, 49%, and 22% in the INSTI, NNRTI and PI arms respectively. Delayed treatment initiation was common (47%) and more frequently observed in patients in the PI arm. It was not associated with virological failure.

CONCLUSION

High efficacy and low virological failure rates were observed with recommended first-line regimens independent of delayed treatment initiation, chosen regimen and subsequent treatment modifications, demonstrating the validity of the current treatment guidelines.

Forecasting Prevalence of HIV-1 Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitor (INSTI) Drug Resistance: A Modeling Study

BACKGROUND

Antiretroviral therapy (ART) is a cornerstone of HIV-1 treatment and provides significant health benefits for patients with responsive HIV-1 strains. Integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) are the newest class of ART. Although most HIV-1 cases are responsive, a small number are already resistant. Here, we forecast the prevalence of INSTI resistance amid wide-spread use.

METHODS

We developed a stochastic model to simulate HIV-1 dynamics and INSTI resistance for raltegravir, elvitegravir, and dolutegravir. We forecast prevalence of INSTI resistance in adults living with HIV-1 over a 30-year period using parameter values and initial conditions that mimic HIV-1 dynamics Washington DC. We used the model to predict the amount of transmitted drug resistance (TDR) versus regimen-acquired drug resistance.

RESULTS

We forecast the prevalence of HIV-1 cases resistant to raltegravir as 0.41 (minimum: 0.21; maximum: 0.57), resistant to elvitegravir as 0.44 (minimum: 0.26; maximum: 0.60), and resistant to dolutegravir as 0.44 (minimum: 0.25; maximum: 0.65). Model output was greatly affected by the proportion of those living with HIV-1 on ART and the rate of converting from an INSTI-sensitive strain to an INSTI-resistant strain for chronically infected ART-experienced cases. We forecast that TDR will contribute minimally-if at all-to the overall proportion of resistant HIV-1 cases.

CONCLUSIONS

INSTI drug resistance has the potential to be a public health concern in the next 30 years. Although several parameters influence the predicted prevalence of INSTI drug resistance, TDR is unlikely to contribute substantially to future trends.

HIV-1 integrase drug-resistance mutations in Iranian treatment-experienced HIV-1-infected patients

The latest class of antiretrovirals (ARVs), including integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs), has been demonstrated to be effective for antiretroviral therapy (ART). Despite all the distinguishing characteristics of these drugs, including a high genetic barrier to resistance and lower toxicity than other ARVs, unfortunately, INSTI drug resistance mutations (DRMs) have occasionally been observed. The aim of this study was to investigate the presence of DRMs associated with INSTIs among treatment-experienced HIV-1-infected patients. From June 2012 to December 2018, a total of 655 treatment-experienced HIV-1-infected patients enrolled in this cross-sectional survey. Following amplification and sequencing of the HIV-1 integrase region of the pol gene, DRM and phylogenetic analysis were successfully carried out on the plasma samples of patients who had a viral load over 1,000 IU/ml after at least 6 months of ART. Out of the 655 patients evaluated, 62 (9.5%) had a viral load higher than 1,000 IU/ml after at least 6 months of ART. Phylogenetic analysis showed that all of the 62 HIV-1 patients experiencing treatment failure were infected with CRF35_AD, and one of these patients (1.6%) was infected with HIV-1 variants with DRMs. The DRMs that were identified belonged to the INSTI class, including E138K, G140A, S147G, and Q148R. This survey shows that DRMs belonging to the INSTI class were detected in an Iranian HIV patient who has experienced treatment failure. Therefore, regarding the presence of DRMs to INSTIs in ART-experienced patients, it seems better to perform drug resistance mutation testing in HIV patients experiencing treatment failure before changing the ART regimen and prescribing this class of medication.

Prevalence of Human Immunodeficiency Virus-1 Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitor Resistance in British Columbia, Canada Between 2009 and 2016: A Longitudinal Analysis

Background

Integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) are highly efficacious and well tolerated antiretrovirals with fewer adverse side-effects relative to other classes of antiretrovirals. The use of INSTIs raltegravir, elvitegravir, and dolutegravir has increased dramatically over recent years. However, there is limited information about the evolution and prevalence of INSTI resistance mutations in clinical human immunodeficiency virus populations.

Methods

Human immunodeficiency virus-1-positive individuals ≥19 years were included if they received ≥1 dispensed prescription of antiretroviral therapy (ART) in British Columbia between 2009 and 2016 (N = 9358). Physician-ordered drug resistance tests were analyzed and protease inhibitor (PI), reverse-transcriptase inhibitor (RT), and INSTI resistance were defined as having ≥1 sample with a combined, cumulative score ≥30 by Stanford HIV Drug Resistance Algorithm version 7.0.1.

Results

Although most ART-treated individuals were tested for PI and RT resistance, INSTI resistance testing lagged behind the uptake of INSTIs among INSTI-treated individuals (11% in 2009; 34% in 2016). The prevalence of INSTI resistance was relatively low, but it increased from 1 to 7 per 1000 ART-treated individuals between 2009 and 2016 (P < .0001, R² = 0.98). Integrase strand transfer inhibitor resistance mutations increased at integrase codons 66, 97, 140, 148, 155, and 263.

Conclusions

The prevalence of INSTI resistance remains low compared with PI and RT resistance in ART-treated populations but is expanding with increased INSTI use.

Prevalence of Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitors Resistance Mutations in Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitors-Naive and -Experienced HIV-1 Infected Patients: A Single Center Experience

Integrase strand transfer inhibitor (InSTI) resistance rates are low. However, genotypic resistance test (GRT) is not routinely performed in many centers. The aim of this study is to evaluate the prevalence of InSTI-related mutations in our large cohort. We examined all integrase GRTs performed as part of routine clinical practice at Spedali Civili General Hospital, University of Brescia from 2011 to 2016. Analysis was performed through the Stanford HIV Drug Resistance Database. A total of 341 patients were included. Genotypic resistance assays were performed in naive (48), ART-experienced but InSTI-naive (114), and both ART-experienced/InSTI-experienced (179) patients. No major resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) were detected in patients never exposed to InSTIs. Of 179 samples from patients exposed to InSTIs (mostly to raltegravir [RAL]), the overall prevalence of major RAMs was 11.7%. Among them, 10 harbored N155H, 4 Q148H, 2 Q148R, 2 Y143C/S, and 2 T66A/I/T, respectively. A novel mutation at a recognized resistance site (E92K) was identified in one RAL-experienced patient. The overall prevalence of InSTI mutations in our cohort was low, particularly in naive patients indicating no transmitted RAMs, although in InSTIs-experienced patients the rate of RAMs was high (11.7%). We support an implementation of surveillance of InSTI resistance.

Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitor Resistance Mutations in Antiretroviral Treatment-naïve Patients in Korea: a Prospective, Observational Study

The present study investigated prevalence of integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTI) resistance mutations in HIV-1-infected antiretroviral therapy (ART)-naïve patients in Korea. From 106 plasma samples, amplification and sequencing of integrase genes was performed, and major or minor mutations were calculated by the Stanford HIV drug resistance mutation interpretation algorithm. No major INSTI resistance mutations were found, and 14 minor mutations were detected in 13 (12.3%) patients. The present data support the recommendation that routine testing for INSTI resistance mutations before starting ART is not necessary.

HIV-1 integrase strand-transfer inhibitor resistance in southern Taiwan

The use of antiretroviral therapy has reduced rates of mortality and morbidity in patients with human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immune deficiency syndrome(HIV/AIDS). However, transmission of drug-resistant strains poses a challenge to control the spread of HIV-1. Primary resistance to integrase strand-transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) is rare despite their increased use. The prevalence of transmitted drug resistance (TDR) to INSTIs was 0.9% in northern Taiwan. This study was to analyse the prevalence and risk factors of TDR to INSTIs in southern Taiwan. In this study, we enrolled antiretroviral treatment-naïve HIV-1-infected subjects who underwent voluntary counselling and testing from 2013 to 2016 in southern Taiwan. Genotypic drug resistance, coreceptor tropism (CRT) and INSTI resistance were determined. Logistic regression was used to analyse the risk factors for INSTI polymorphic substitution. Sequences were obtained from 184 consecutive individuals, of whom 96.7% were men who have sex with men and 3.3% were heterosexual. Of the patients, 10% (19/183) had hepatitis B and 33.3% (61/183) had syphilis infection. Subtype B HIV-1 strains were found in 96.1% of the patients. Fifteen patients (8.4%, 15/178) harboured nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors or protease inhibitors resistance. CCR-5 coreceptors were used by 71.4% (130/184) of the patients. None of the patients had INSTI resistance-associated mutations, however 16 patients had INSTI polymorphic substitutions, and they were associated with a higher HIV viral load (p = 0.03, OR 2.4, CI 1.1–5.3) and syphilis infection (p = 0.03, OR 3.7, CI 1.1–12.0). In conclusion, no signature INSTI resistance-associated mutations were detected in our cohort. Continued monitoring of TDR to INSTI is needed due to the increased use of INSTIs.

Mechanisms and Factors That Drive Extensive Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type-1 Hypervariability: An Overview

The extensive hypervariability of human immunodeficiency virus type-1 (HIV-1) populations represents a major barrier against the success of currently available antiretroviral therapy. Moreover, it is still the most important obstacle that faces the development of an effective preventive vaccine against this infectious virus. Indeed, several factors can drive such hypervariability within and between HIV-1 patients. These factors include: first, the very low fidelity nature of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase; second, the extremely high HIV-1 replication rate; and third, the high genomic recombination rate that the virus has. All these factors together with the APOBEC3 proteins family and the immune and antiviral drugs pressures drive the extensive hypervariability of HIV-1 populations. Studying these factors and the mechanisms that drive such hypervariability will provide valuable insights that may guide the development of effective therapeutic and preventive strategies against HIV-1 infection in the near future. To this end, in this review, we summarized recent advances in this area of HIV-1 research.

Pretreatment integrase strand transfer inhibitor resistance in North Carolina from 2010-2016

OBJECTIVE

We sought to define the prevalence of pretreatment integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) resistance and assess the transmission networks of those with pretreatment INSTI resistance.

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study of HIV-positive patients with genotypic resistance testing sent to a single referral laboratory in North Carolina between 2010 and 2016.

METHODS

We linked genotype and public health data for in-care HIV-positive individuals to determine the prevalence of INSTI resistance among treatment-naive (defined as those with a first genotype ≤3 months after diagnosis) and treatment-experienced (defined as those with a first genotype >3 months after diagnosis) patients. We performed molecular and phylogenetic analyses to assess whether pretreatment INSTI resistance mutations represented clustered HIV transmission.

RESULTS

Of 8825 individuals who contributed sequences for protease, reverse transcriptase, or INSTI genotypic resistance testing during the study period, 2784 (31%) contributed at least one sequence for INSTI resistance testing. Of these, 840 were treatment-naive individuals and 20 [2.4%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.5, 3.6%] had INSTI mutations; only two (0.2%, 95% CI: 0.02, 0.9%) had major mutations. Of 1944 treatment-experienced individuals, 9.6% (95% CI: 8.3, 11.0%) had any INSTI mutation and 7.0% (95% CI: 5.9, 8.3%) had major mutations; the prevalence of INSTI mutations among treatment-experienced patients decreased overtime (P < 0.001). In total 12 of 20 individuals with pretreatment INSTI mutations were part of 10 molecular transmission clusters; only one cluster shared identical minor mutations.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of major pretreatment INSTI resistance is very low. Pretreatment INSTI mutations do not appear to represent clustered HIV transmission.

Prevalence of HIV-1 transmitted drug resistance in the incarcerated population

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to determine the prevalence of transmitted drug resistance (TDR)-associated mutations among treatment-naïve, incarcerated individuals with HIV-1 infection in the USA as well as the class TDR and antiretroviral (ARV) mutations present at baseline.

METHODS

Patients over the age of 18 years were included in the study if they had been diagnosed with HIV infection, if their HIV infection was managed through telemedicine and if they were incarcerated in the State of Illinois Department of Corrections between 10 July 2010 and 29 April 2016. Additionally, the patients were required to have a documented genotype and be ARV-naïve. A medical chart review was conducted to assess demographic information, disease burden, and risk factors for acquiring the virus.

RESULTS

The inclusion criteria were met for 105 patients. A total of 24 patients (23%) had a clinically significant mutation associated with resistance to any drug class. The prevalence of mutations conferring clinically significant resistance was 19% for nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), 18% for nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), and 4% for protease inhibitors (PIs). Five per cent of patients had dual-class TDR to both NRTI and NNRTI drug classes and 2% of patients had mutations to both NNRTI and PI drug classes. There was no significant increase in the prevalence of clinically relevant drug resistance mutations based on demographics, burden of disease, or risk factors for acquiring the virus.

CONCLUSIONS

A high prevalence of TDR was identified in the ARV-naïve incarcerated population. The results of this study indicate an increased prevalence of TDR in a largely unstudied incarcerated population, demonstrating the need for increased monitoring of resistance in HIV-infected patients world-wide.