GeneXpert of stool versus gastric lavage fluid for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in severely ill adults

Performance of stool-based Xpert MTB/RIF assay in the diagnosis of presumptive pulmonary tuberculosis in adults unable to expectorate sputum

This study aimed to compare the performance of stool-based Xpert MTB/RIF(Xpert) assay (Cepheid, USA) against that of smear, culture, and Xpert using respiratory tract specimens (RTS) and stool samples in the diagnosis of adult pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB). This prospective study of patients with presumptive PTB was conducted at the Beijing Chest Hospital from January 2021 to December 2021. The smear test by fluorescence microscope, MGIT 960 liquid culture, and Xpert MTB/RIF assay was performed simultaneously on the RTS and stool samples. Patients were grouped based on the RTS examination results and clinical diagnosis. A total of 434 eligible patients were enrolled. Among these, 351 patients were diagnosed as PTB, while 83 patients were diagnosed as non-TB patients. Using RTS as standard sample, the sensitivity of smear on stool, culture on stool, Xpert on stool, and Xpert on RTS was 13.39% (47/351), 22.22% (78/351), 45.30% (159/351), and 66.10% (232/351), respectively. Furthermore, the specificity of Xpert on RTS and stool was 100% (83/83) for both specimens. Among the 48 patients with PTB confirmed by bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) examination, 16 had stool specimens with positive Xpert results. Similarly, among 200 patients diagnosed through sputum examination, 133 had positive Xpert results on stool specimens. Thus, Xpert on stool specimens may be a promising and practical strategy to improve PTB diagnosis, particularly among patients unable to expectorate sputum.IMPORTANCEThis study aimed to assess the value of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay (Xpert) for diagnosing PTB using stool samples from adults in low HIV prevalence settings. Although the diagnostic yield of Xpert on stool samples is inferior to that of Xpert on RTS, stool-based Xpert may be useful in diagnosing patients with presumptive PTB who cannot expectorate sputum and do not opt for BALF collection.

Performance of a stool-based quantitative PCR assay for the diagnosis of tuberculosis in adolescents and adults: a multinational, prospective diagnostic accuracy study

BACKGROUND

Despite increasing availability of rapid molecular tests for the diagnosis of tuberculosis in high-burden settings, many people with tuberculosis are undiagnosed. Reliance on sputum as the primary specimen for tuberculosis diagnostics contributes to this diagnostic gap. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy and additive yield of a novel stool quantitative PCR (qPCR) assay for the diagnosis of tuberculosis in three countries in Africa with high tuberculosis burdens.

METHODS

We undertook a prospective diagnostic accuracy study in Eswatini, Mozambique, and Tanzania from Sept 21, 2020, to Feb 2, 2023, to compare the diagnostic accuracy for tuberculosis of a novel stool qPCR test with the current diagnostic standard for Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA detection from sputum and stool, Xpert-MTB/RIF Ultra (Xpert Ultra). Sputum, stool, and urine samples were provided by a cohort of participants, aged 10 years or older, diagnosed with tuberculosis. Participants with tuberculosis (cases) were enrolled within 72 h of treatment initiation for tuberculosis diagnosed clinically or following laboratory confirmation. Participants without tuberculosis (controls) consisted of household contacts of the cases who did not develop tuberculosis during a 6-month follow-up. The performance was compared with a robust composite microbiological reference standard (CMRS).

FINDINGS

The cohort of adolescents and adults (n=408) included 268 participants with confirmed or clinical tuberculosis (cases), 147 (55%) of whom were living with HIV, and 140 participants (controls) without tuberculosis. The sensitivity of the novel stool qPCR was 93·7% (95% CI 87·4-97·4) compared with participants with detectable growth on M tuberculosis culture, and 88·1% (81·3-93·0) compared with sputum Xpert Ultra. The stool qPCR had an equivalent sensitivity as sputum Xpert Ultra (94·8%, 89·1-98·1) compared with culture. Compared with the CMRS, the sensitivity of the stool qPCR was higher than the current standard for tuberculosis diagnostics on stool, Xpert Ultra (80·4%, 73·4-86·2 vs 73·5%, 66·0-80·1; p=0·025 on paired comparison). The qPCR also identified 17-21% additional tuberculosis cases compared to sputum Xpert Ultra or sputum culture. In controls without tuberculosis, the specificity of the stool qPCR was 96·9% (92·2-99·1).

INTERPRETATION

In this study, a novel qPCR for the diagnosis of tuberculosis from stool specimens had a higher accuracy in adolescents and adults than the current diagnostic PCR gold standard on stool, Xpert-MTB/RIF Ultra, and equivalent sensitivity to Xpert-MTB/RIF Ultra on sputum.

FUNDING

National Institutes of Health (NIH) Allergy and Infectious Diseases, and NIH Fogarty International Center.

Stool specimen for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in adults: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To assess the diagnostic accuracy of stool specimens to diagnose pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) in adults.

DESIGN

Systematic review.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), Web of Science and the Cochrane database were searched from inception to 9 March 2023-10 March 2023 using a comprehensive search strategy; reference lists of selected articles and relevant review articles were manually searched.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES

Studies in English reporting diagnostic performance of stool specimens against respiratory specimens using mycobacterial culture or smear microscopy or Xpert assay to diagnose PTB in adults were eligible for this systematic review.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Two reviewers independently screened the retrieved citations and extracted data. The risk of bias and applicability of results were assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. Narrative data synthesis was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 1658 citations were screened, and 28 full-text articles were assessed. Nine studies met the inclusion criteria. The reported sensitivity and specificity of stool culture varied between 21.4% and 63.9%, and 61.5% and 100%, respectively. In stool smear microscopy, sensitivities and specificities ranged from 12.1% to 53.9%, and from 79.5% to 100%, respectively. The reported sensitivities of PCR assays, including Xpert assays, ranged from 69.7% to 100%, with specificities ranging from 69.8% to 100%. Most of the studies had a low risk of bias and a low applicability concern in all domains.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review could not conclude on the diagnostic accuracy of stool specimens for PTB diagnosis in adults. Further studies are required to evaluate the accuracy of stool specimens in adults to enable meta-analyses in updates of this review as well as other systematic reviews.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42021245203.

Correlation between Sputum Bacterial Culture Positive Rate and Drug Sensitivity Test Results and Disease Severity inInpatients and Its Clinical Significance: A SystematicReview and Meta-Analysis

Objective. To systematically evaluate the correlation between the positive rate of sputum bacterial culture and the results of drug sensitivity test and the severity of the disease and its clinical significance, so as to provide evidence-based medicine for clinical application. Methods. PubMed, Embase, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, China Knowledge Network Database (CNKI), China VIP Database, Wanfang Database, and China Biomedical Literature Database (CBM) online database were used. The retrieval time limit was from the establishment of the database to the present. Data for all included studies were extracted by two independent researchers, and the risk of bias for the quality of each included study was assessed by the Cochrane Handbook 5.1.0 criteria. RevMan5.4 statistical software was used to analyze the collected data by meta. Results. In the end, 6 RCT articles were included. Overall, 613 samples were included in 6 RCT studies. The correlation between the positive rate of sputum bacterial culture in inpatients and the severity of the disease was meta-analyzed. The heterogeneity test results showed that Chi2 = 177.20, df = 3, P < 0.00001, and I2 = 98%, indicating that there was obvious heterogeneity among the included research data. It was considered that there was a correlation between the positive rate of sputum bacterial culture and the severity of the disease. The correlation between the results of the drug sensitivity test of inpatients and the severity of the disease was evaluated. The results of the heterogeneity test showed that Chi2 = 0.00, df = 1, P = 1 > 0.05, and I2 = 0%, indicating that there was no heterogeneity among the included research data. In addition, the combined effect of WMD was analyzed by the fixed effect model. The combined effect dose WMD test was Z = 6.58 (P < 0.00001). It was considered that there was a correlation between the results of the drug sensitivity test and the severity of the disease. Conclusion. There is a correlation between positive sputum culture and drug sensitivity test results and the severity of the disease in hospitalized patients. In clinical practice, for hospitalized patients, the positive sputum bacterial culture rate and drug sensitivity test results can be used to guide the appropriate use of antibiotics. Due to the low input from the literature, more studies with higher methodological quality and longer follow-up are needed for further validation.