Guidelines: The dos, don'ts and don't knows of remediation in medical education

Learner Success Model in Physical Therapy Education

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Physical therapy educators recognize the need for enhanced learner support to ensure degree completion, licensure, and high-quality, safe patient care. High costs are associated with academic difficulty for learners, educators, programs, institutions, and clinical partners. The urgency to find effective learner support methods is paramount. This paper aims to explain the importance of the affective domain and to highlight external system-level factors affecting learner success through a proposed Learner Success Model in Physical Therapy Education (LSM PTE).

METHOD/MODEL DESCRIPTION AND EVALUATION

The LSM PTE captures the complexity of learner attributes and external systems. This model emphasizes the affective domain and interconnected systems in a socio-ecological model, placing learners within overlapping spheres of influence. The center represents internal attributes and essential learning domains while the spheres represent system-level factors also affecting outcomes. The model's application is explored through a case vignette for a learner needing additional support.

OUTCOMES

Although outcomes of the LSM PTE are not yet known, this model provides a framework for identifying potential impacts within each sphere.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

The LSM PTE illuminates a comprehensive perspective necessary to support learners in physical therapy education. This approach, which includes the affective domain and various system-level factors, extends beyond cognitive and psychomotor learning domains to promote successful learner outcomes, helping achieve program, profession, and societal goals.

Remediation in Pediatric Residency Training: A National Survey of Pediatric Program Directors

BACKGROUND

The goal of graduate medical education is for residents to achieve the skills and knowledge to practice medicine independently. While remediation is not uncommon in residency training, evidence is lacking to guide best practices.

METHODS

We conducted a national survey of pediatric residency programs regarding their remediation experiences identifying struggling residents, documentating the process, and monitoring progress during remediation.

RESULTS

A total of 50.8% (99/195) programs responded. Approximately 4.7% of residents underwent remediation, and 91% (262/288) of residents successfully completed remediation. Programs used data from the Clinical Competency Committee (CCC; 100%), rotation evaluations (98.9%) and direct observation (96.6%) to identify residents who need remediation. Most programs used an improvement plan to document resident progress (88.8%) and assigned a mentor or coach to support the resident (88.8%). Nearly all programs used rotation evaluations (93.3%) to monitor progress towards achieving the goals of remediation. Two-thirds (66.3%) felt their remediation process was either very effective or effective, and about half (56.2%) were very satisfied or satisfied with their remediation process. Programs with more residents who successfully completed remediation were more likely to feel satisfied with their program's remediation processess and effectiveness.

CONCLUSIONS

Nearly 5% of pediatrics residents undergo remediation, with 91% successfully remediating. Two-thirds of program leaders feel their remediation practices are effective, and only half are satisfied with remediation processes in their program. Opportunities exist to improve remediation processes for pediatric residents and for programs to ensure graduation of competent pediatricians.

Mapping Out Remediation: An Actionable Roadmap to Support Trainees Through Remediation

OBJECTIVE

The goal of graduate medical education is for trainees to develop the competence needed to practice independently; however, some residents struggle to achieve competency and require remediation. Evidence around how to best facilitate remediation is lacking. The objective of this study was to understand best practices for remediation in pediatrics.

METHODS

A national web-based survey of pediatric residency program directors (PDs) on remediation practices was performed. The survey included three open-ended questions about PDs' experiences with remediation. Self-reported barriers to and strategies for remediation were systematically analyzed using inductive thematic analysis to develop a theory of effective remediation in pediatric residency training.

RESULTS

A total of 99 out of 195 (50.8%) program directors responded. Two main themes emerged: developing a personalized plan that ensures competency attainment and fostering psychological safety. Twelve categories outline actionable steps that PDs can take to make the remediation process successful.

CONCLUSIONS

Built from insight from pediatric PDs, we propose a conceptual model for effective remediation that accounts for competency attainment while safeguarding the emotional health of the resident. The conceptual model breaks the remediation process down into four phases: identification of the learner who struggles, planning the remediation process, implementation of the plan, and assessing the outcome of the process.

Local clinical practice patterns in urolithiasis guidelines: a critical evaluation from Turkey

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the current clinical practice patterns regarding the utilization of "Urolithiasis Guidelines" in Turkey and to identify critical factors influencing their application by urologists.

METHODS

The study targeted practicing urologists in Turkey, primarily those involved in the management of urolithiasis, to assess their perspectives and experiences regarding the clinical application of established guidelines. A total of 415 urology specialists were invited to participate in a survey-based study conducted via Google Forms. Participation was voluntary, and 65.08% of the invited urologists completed the survey.

RESULTS

Among the respondents, 84.7% reported utilizing the available guidelines in their routine clinical practice, with varying frequencies of reference. The primary motivations for guideline use were the prevention of potential complications and the avoidance of legal risks, as indicated by 90.5% of respondents. While 56.9% of participants adhered to the guidelines as a clinically standardized practice, 41.6% reported applying the recommendations on a case-by-case basis. Notably, 41.0% of respondents emphasized the need for locally adapted versions of guideline texts. Additionally, nearly half of the participants reported receiving no formal education or training on the significance, content, and practical application of these guidelines. Furthermore, 12.7% expressed skepticism about the evidence-based foundation of the guidelines, questioning whether the recommendations were derived from rigorously conducted studies.

CONCLUSION

The available urolithiasis guidelines are recognized as valuable resources offering key recommendations for the effective and safe management of urolithiasis. However, findings from this survey highlight significant variability in clinical practice patterns due to local conditions and the individual experience and attitudes of practicing urologists. The application of guideline recommendations is further influenced by perceptions regarding their development, content, and practicality. Insights gathered from this study may contribute to improving the preparation, dissemination, and implementation of urolithiasis guidelines, particularly in adapting them to local clinical settings.

'We're like Spider-Man; with great power comes great responsibility': Coaches' experiences supporting struggling medical students

BACKGROUND

Medical students can experience a range of academic and non-academic struggles. Coaching is a valuable strategy to support learners, but coaches describe working with struggling learners as taxing. Transformative learning theory (TLT) provides insights into how educators grow from challenging experiences to build resilience. This study explores how coaches evolve as educators through supporting struggling students.

METHODS

This qualitative study grounded in an interpretivist paradigm used interviews of longitudinal medical student coaches at two academic institutions. Interviews, using TLT as a sensitizing concept, explored coaches' experience coaching struggling learners. We performed thematic analysis.

RESULTS

We interviewed 15 coaches. Coaches described supporting students through multi-faceted struggles which often surprised the coach. Three themes characterized coaches' experiences: personal responsibility, emotional response, and personal learning. Coaches shouldered high personal responsibility for learners' success. For some, this burden felt emotional, raised parental instincts and questions about maintaining boundaries with learners. Coaches evolved their coaching approach, challenged biases, and built skills. Coaches learned to better appreciate the learner point of view and employ resources to support students.

DISCUSSION

Through navigating learner struggles, educators can gain self-efficacy, learn to understand learners' perspectives, and evolve their coaching approach to lessen their personal emotional burden through time.

Best Practices for Early Intervention and Remediation of Residents in Family Medicine: Insights From an Interdisciplinary Delphi Study

BACKGROUND

Remediation and early intervention for family medicine residents who experience performance problems represent a challenge for programs, faculty, and residents. Some evidence suggests that identifying those at risk for performance problems and providing support early may prevent more serious issues later in residency.

OBJECTIVES

We wanted to explore the perspectives of content experts to identify best practices for early intervention and remediation to address common challenges and create a framework for more effective and inclusive early intervention and remediation.

METHODS

We used a Delphi approach to identify themes and best practices for early intervention and remediation, including qualitative interviews, identification of themes, clarification of essential practices, and confirmation of agreement with core medical faculty.

RESULTS

Our qualitative interviews and Delphi methodology identified best practices in five main categories: (a) early assessment and identification, (b) feedback, (c) resident engagement, (d) intervention strategies and resources, and (e) documentation. From an initial pool of 38 recommendations, we identified a final group of 11 practices that generated broad agreement among behavioral science faculty and core medical faculty.

CONCLUSIONS

Key principles for early intervention and remediation include early skill assessment, data-driven feedback, collaborative processes, diverse resources, clear documentation, and faculty training for providing actionable feedback. While our Delphi study provided in-depth insights into various programs' practices, it may not capture unique practices across all programs. Future research on early intervention and remediation should explore current practices, aiming for specific, collaborative, and transparent processes, with insights from experienced faculty, to enhance equity and effectiveness.

Bridging the Gap: Implementing an Adjunct Faculty as a Remediation Specialist in a Physician Assistant/Associate Program

INTRODUCTION

Creating a successful remediation plan for physician assistant/associate students comes with its challenges, particularly because of the limited time available for both faculty and students. In an accelerated 24-month program, the pace of the curriculum leaves little time to fall behind in mastering knowledge and skills. One possible solution is appointing an adjunct faculty member to serve as a dedicated Remediation Specialist (RS) to focus solely on student remediation.

METHODS

The RS reviews assessments of failing students and develops a review session based on shared areas of weakness among them. This session is promptly offered postassessment to ensure timely review. While required for failing students, the session is open to all didactic students. In addition, students complete a remediation assignment of their choice.

RESULTS

Implementation of a RS demonstrated positive program outcomes. Students requiring remediation receive re-education in areas of deficiency within the curriculum. Furthermore, the time burden is shifted away from the core faculty. Students are remediated in targeted areas.

DISCUSSION

Dedicated remediation specialists are commonly used in health profession education programs. The utilization of these specialists often results in higher examination pass rates, licensure pass rates, and improved clinical skills. While some programs select a candidate training in education and pedagogy, our program's RS is a trained physician assistant/associate and able to provide discipline-specific support.

Interventions for undergraduate and postgraduate medical learners with academic difficulties: A BEME systematic review update: BEME Guide No. 85

BACKGROUND

Clinical teachers often struggle to record trainee underperformance due to lacking evidence-based remediation options.

OBJECTIVES

To provide updated evidence-based recommendations for addressing academic difficulties among undergraduate and postgraduate medical learners.

METHODS

A systematic review searched databases including MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, ERIC, Education Source, and PsycINFO (2016-2021), replicating the original Best Evidence Medical Education 56 review strategy. Original research/innovation reports describing intervention(s) for medical learners with academic difficulties were included. Data extraction used Michie's Behaviour Change Techniques (BCT) Taxonomy and program evaluation models from Stufflebeam and Kirkpatrick. Quality appraised used the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). Authors synthesized extracted evidence by adapting GRADE approach to formulate recommendations.

RESULTS

Eighteen articles met the inclusion criteria, primarily addressing knowledge (66.7%), skills (66.7%), attitudinal problems (50%) and learner's personal challenges (27.8%). Feedback and monitoring was the most frequently employed BCT. Study quality varied (MMAT 0-100%). We identified nineteen interventions (UG: n = 9, PG: n = 12), introducing twelve new thematic content. Newly thematic content addressed contemporary learning challenges such as academic procrastination, and use of technology-enhanced learning resources. Combined with previous interventions, the review offers a total dataset of 121 interventions.

CONCLUSION

This review offers additional evidence-based interventions for learners with academic difficulties, supporting teaching, learning, faculty development, and research efforts.

Remediation of Preclinical Course Failures in a DVM Program and Its Impact on Program Outcomes: A 10-Year Descriptive Study

Remediation provides academically struggling students reasonable opportunities to correct deficiencies in knowledge or skills, achieve competence, and potentially reverse failures. At Purdue University College of Veterinary Medicine, a remediation policy in the preclinical years of the DVM program was implemented beginning with the class of 2014. We evaluated its impact on our DVM program and student outcomes. Using data from DVM classes of 2011 to 2023, we compared academic outcomes between remediating and non-remediating class cohorts and, within remediating cohorts, between students with and without academic difficulties. Despite changes in class size and admissions criteria, 4-year graduation and relative attrition rates were similar in remediating (92.2% and 4.2%) and non-remediating (92.3% and 4.8%) cohorts. Success at the North American Veterinary Licensing Examination (NAVLE) prior to graduation was lower in remediating than in non-remediating cohorts (94.5% vs. 97.0%). Among 815 students in remediating cohorts, 157 (19.3%) failed ≥1 courses. Of the 157 students, 134 (85.4%) attempted remediation of ≥1 failed courses, 125 (79.6%) successfully remediated ≥1 failed courses, and 96 (61.1%) successfully remediated all their failed courses. Remediation occurred more often in first-year than in second- or third-year courses. While 99% of the 96 successfully remediated students graduated in 4 years, 13.5% failed ≥1 clinical blocks and 18.7% did not pass NAVLE before DVM graduation. Our remediation policy enabled successfully remediated students to avoid delayed graduation, but some students struggled in the clinical year and at passing the NAVLE prior to graduation. Additional support systems are necessary to help students pass the NAVLE before graduation.

Bridging knowledge gaps: impact of remedial classes on first-year medical students in biochemistry - a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Remedial teaching is a tailored educational approach dedicated to enhancing the academic performance of students facing challenges within the curriculum. By identifying and addressing specific learning difficulties, it provides essential support and guidance to bring students closer to expected standards while preventing future setbacks. We hypothesize that underperforming medical students who receive daily, tailored remediation will demonstrate significant improvement in their formative and summative assessment scores in biochemistry.

METHODS

A cross-sectional mixed-method study was conducted on 56 underperforming first-year medical undergraduates to assess the effect of targeted remediation on formative and summative assessments in Biochemistry. Training sessions included various remediation techniques over six months. Post-remediation feedback was collected to gather insights into students' attitudes, perceptions, and the effectiveness of the methods in improving their understanding of the subject. Logistic regression analysis was employed to determine the most effective remediation for student performance. Benefits and weaknesses of remedial training approaches for future application as perceived by the students were derived through deductive thematic analysis of their feedback.

RESULTS

The mean marks, evaluated out of a maximum of 100, showed improvement from 29.86 ± 7.71 to 71.48 ± 10.19, with statistical significance (p < 0.001). From the students' perspective, the most effective remediation method was grade incentives in formative assessments (odds ratio 6.19). Five major themes were identified: perceived barriers prior to remediation, positive outcomes and behavioral changes observed after remediation, and strengths and areas for improvement in remediation.

CONCLUSIONS

The study concludes that identifying underperformers in the early stages of the medical curriculum and providing them with tailored remediation can enhance their performance in exams. Grade incentives in formative assessments, mind maps, quizzes, quick revisions, and assignments were beneficial remedial tools. Targeted remediation proved advantageous for students in improving their academic skills, exam preparation, time management, and attitudes towards the subject.

"A clean slate": Insights for improving remediation from the perspectives of underperforming surgical trainees

BACKGROUND

Remediation frameworks have centered around perspectives of educators. The aim of this study is to explore the insights proposed by surgical trainees to improve remediation processes.

METHODS

This qualitative study used semi-structured interviews with 11 doctors who have experienced formal remediation as a surgical trainee. We used reflexive thematic analysis on transcribed interviews.

RESULTS

Trainees recommended creating environments that safeguarded their well-being. Examples include trainee-led peer support groups and external mentors. Feedback conversations and remediation plans were flagged as needing improvement. Opportunities for forward planning for successful remediation were suggested including learning plans, program evaluation and aligning training program structure with expectations.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings about trainees' insights on improving remediation highlighted the need for further emotional support for trainees. Supervisors need further support with feedback conversations and remediation plans. Actively seeking out trainee perspectives and integrating their recommendations when designing remediation processes should improve outcomes.

Does Game-Based Learning Promote Academic Engagement Among Millennial Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Residents?

BACKGROUND

House staff participating in surgical residency programs are often comprised of adult learners from the millennial generation (Gen Y). With the increasing gap in both age and learning styles between these residents and their educators, their educators are struggling to keep them academically engaged.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to measure the association between implementing a digital online Jeopardy! (Sony Pictures Studios, Culver City, CA) style game (digital game) (Factile Solace Creative, LLC, Melbourne Beach, FL) into oral maxillofacial surgery (OMS) resident didactic training and Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery In-service Training Examination (OMSITE) scores.

STUDY DESIGN, SETTING, SAMPLE

This study was a retrospective cohort study conducted at The New York Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medicine. OMS residents who took the OMSITE examination were included in the study. Exclusion criteria included OMS residents who did not take the OMSITE in a given year.

INDEPENDENT VARIABLE

The independent variable was the timing of the implementation of the digital game, divided into before and after implementation.

MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLES

The primary outcome variable was OMSITE scores.

COVARIATES

Covariates included demographics (age, gender, and race), year of training, and number of examination attempts.

ANALYSES

Descriptive and bivariate statistics included Fisher's exact test and Wilcoxon rank sum test. Linear mixed modeling was performed to take into account multiple observations per participants.

RESULTS

The sample composed of 14 resident subjects with a median age of 27.5 (27.0, 28.7) years. Females represented 29% of the cohort. Seventy-one percent of the participants were Post Graduate Year 1. The median (interquartile range) OMSITE score preimplementation: 61 (48, 71) and postimplementation: 79 (68, 87). On average, the OMSITE scores improved significantly following the implementation of this study modality (P < .001).

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

Digital games may be an effective learning tool to prepare residents for OMSITE by promoting academic engagement.

"I'm on an island": A qualitative study of underperforming surgical trainee perspectives on remediation

BACKGROUND

There is a significant gap in the literature regarding trainees' perceptions of remediation. This study aims to explore surgical trainees' experiences and perspectives of remediation.

METHODS

This qualitative study used semi-structured interviews with 11 doctors who have experienced formal remediation as a surgical trainee. Reflexive thematic analysis was used for data analysis.

RESULTS

In this study, trainees perceived remediation as a harrowing and isolating experience, with long-lasting emotions. There was a perceived lack of clarity regarding explanations of underperformance and subjective goals. Remediation was viewed as a 'performance' and tick-box exercise with superficial plans, with challenging trainee/supervisor dynamics.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings about trainees' perspectives on remediation show a need for trainees to be better emotionally supported during remediation and that remediation plans must be improved to address deficits. Integrating the perspectives and experiences of surgical trainees who have undergone remediation should help improve remediation outcomes and patient care.

Twelve tips for designing and implementing peer-led assessment writing schemes in health professions education

Peer-led assessment (PLA) has gained increasing prominence within health professions education as an effective means of engaging learners in the process of assessment writing and practice. Involving students in various stages of the assessment lifecycle, including item writing, quality assurance, and feedback, not only facilitates the creation of high-quality item banks with minimal faculty input but also promotes the development of students' assessment literacy and fosters their growth as teachers. The advantages of involving students in the generation of assessments are evident from a pedagogical standpoint, benefiting both students and faculty. However, faculty members may face uncertainty when it comes to implementing such approaches effectively. To address this concern, this paper presents twelve tips that offer guidance on important considerations for the successful implementation of peer-led assessment schemes in the context of health professions education.

Examining the approach to medical remediation programmes-an observational study

BACKGROUND

Remediation of underperforming students is recognised as an important tool in medical education; however, there is no universally agreed approach.

AIMS

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a remediation program for final year medical students who failed their first long case assessment (LCA1) and to compare their academic performance with their peers who passed their first long case assessment.

METHODS

The study consisted of two phases. Phase 1 analysed the demographics and academic performance data for the 9% of the class in the remediation group. Phase 2 focused on collecting similar data for the remaining 91% of students in the non-remediation group. Statistical analyses including the Wilcoxon rank sum test and Pearson correlation coefficients were used to compare the groups.

RESULTS

Phase 1 showed 88% of students who participated in remediation successfully passed the second long case assessment (LCA2); however, 25% of this cohort ultimately failed the academic year due to poor results in other assessments. Phase 2 results revealed that non-remediation group students scored significantly higher in LCA2 (59.71% vs 52.07%, p < 0.001) compared to their remediation counterparts, despite 19% of them failing this assessment. Non-remediation group students consistently outperformed their remediation group counterparts in formative and summative assessments. Overall, 6.25% of the entire class failed the academic year.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates the need to focus on overall academic performance to identify struggling students rather than one high stakes exam. Most of the students in the remediation programme ultimately passed LCA2.

Coping Strategies of Failing International Medical Students in Two Chinese Universities: A Qualitative Study

Phenomenon: China hosts a large number of international medical students from low-income countries, and some fail examinations in the early stage of the Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery (MBBS) program. Little is known about how failing international medical students cope to recover their academic performance. It would be beneficial to investigate the coping strategies they use to help them recover their academic performance and progress. Approach: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 21 international medical students at two universities in China from September 2020 to January 2021. These students had passed make-up exams or re-sits and progressed academically. A thematic analysis approach was used to identify major themes in the interview data. Findings: After failing initial exams or re-sits, students were found to adopt seven coping strategies to help them pass future examinations and recover their academic performance: (i) increased help-seeking behaviors, (ii) improved learning motivation and attitudes, (iii) improved learning strategies, (iv) improved exam preparation, (v) utilization of library resources, (vi) enhanced time management, and (vii) enhanced English language skills. Of the seven strategies, seeking help from friends, peers, seniors, and teachers was the strategy reported most frequently. Insights: The results of this study provide insights into the coping strategies that international undergraduate medical students adopt to recover from poor academic performance in Chinese universities. Host institutions should recognize the resilience and agency of such students to make positive changes. Furthermore, institutional efforts should be made to develop contextualized intervention plans that stimulate students' learning motivation and encourage them to adopt self-help strategies by incorporating useful resources (e.g., help from peers, seniors, and teachers). Enrollment should integrate specific English language proficiency criteria, and interviews and entrance exams should be conducted. For some failing students, it may be necessary to provide academic remediation.

The missing ingredient: Medical student insights to inform and enhance learner handover

BACKGROUND

Learner handover (LH) is the passing on of information about students between educators. In light of broad acceptance that LH can improve learner support experiences and performance outcomes, those involved are seeking greater governance to achieve practical, effective handover implementation. Stakeholder consultation can inform and enable the co-creation of meaningful, robust practice guidance. This study sought to address the gap in literature around in-depth learner opinion, a key element so far overlooked.

METHODS

This qualitative study (2022) investigated undergraduate medical student perspectives on appropriate tutor information-sharing at the University of Limerick School of Medicine (ULSoM). The findings build upon an educator focus group study published by the authors (2021). Eleven participants were recruited to represent the typical graduate-entry medical school programme population across years 1-4 of study. Their understanding and expectations of "learner handover" were explored qualitatively, using online, individual, semi-structured interviews. Inductive transcript coding and thematic data analysis were applied to illustrate learner insights.

FINDINGS

Emergent themes included shared values, individual context and collaborative process, with ideas proposed for specific action around student education, staff training, mental health support, and documented procedures.

DISCUSSION

Consent, system transparency, data security and the development of positive handover culture were revealed as current needs. Student perspectives, together existing LH literature and highlighted aspects of educational theory, allowed the creation a new conceptual LH framework as a foundation for practice improvement.

CONCLUSION

These findings provide clarity and contextual understanding, mainly from a pre-clinical phase learner standpoint, with pragmatic suggestions to enhance LH appeal.

Pre- and post-examination reflections of first-year medical students in an integrated medical anatomy course

Due to the rigor and pace of undergraduate medical anatomy courses, it is not uncommon for students to struggle and fail initially. However, repetition of coursework places an additional burden on the student, instructor, and institution. The purpose of this study was to compare the exam preparation strategies of repeating and non-repeating students to identify areas where struggling students can be supported prior to course failure. As part of their integrated anatomy course, first-year medical students at Indiana University completed a metacognitive Practice-Based Learning and Improvement (PBLI) assignment prior to and after their first exam. In the PBLIs, students were asked to reflect on their exam preparation strategies, confidence, and satisfaction, as well as their predicted and actual exam performance. PBLI responses from non-repeating and repeating students were then analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively. A total of 1802 medical students were included in this study, including 1751 non-repeating and 51 repeating students. Based on their PBLI responses, non-repeating students were appropriately confident, somewhat satisfied, and more accurate when predicting their exam performance. Repeating students were overconfident, dissatisfied, and inaccurate when predicting their first exam performance on their initial, unsuccessful attempt but were more successful on their second, repeat attempt. Qualitative analysis revealed that repeating students aimed to improve their studying by modifying their existing study strategies and managing their time more effectively. In conjunction with other known risk factors, these insights into repeater and non-repeater exam preparation practices can help anatomy educators better identify and support potential struggling students.

Professional Success: Utilizing Simulation to Remediate and Retain Nursing Staff

Nursing education focuses on nursing theory and the ability to perform tasks. There is a lack of education related to prioritization of nursing tasks. Therefore, new nurses transitioning into their roles sometimes struggle and, as a result, leave their units or, often enough, our facility. We developed a Professional Success Program that includes cognitive prioritization exercises and simulation scenarios to assist these nurses. After utilizing the program, our facility has seen an increase in nurse retention.

Competency-Based Medical Education in a Norm-Referenced World: A Root Cause Analysis of Challenges to the Competency-Based Paradigm in Medical School

Competency-based medical education (CBME) requires a criterion-referenced approach to assessment. However, despite best efforts to advance CBME, there remains an implicit, and at times, explicit, demand for norm-referencing, particularly at the junction of undergraduate medical education (UME) and graduate medical education (GME). In this manuscript, the authors perform a root cause analysis to determine the underlying reasons for continued norm-referencing in the context of the movement toward CBME. The root cause analysis consisted of 2 processes: (1) identification of potential causes and effects organized into a fishbone diagram and (2) identification of the 5 whys. The fishbone diagram identified 2 primary drivers: the false notion that measures such as grades are truly objective and the importance of different incentives for different key constituents. From these drivers, the importance of norm-referencing for residency selection was identified as a critical component. Exploration of the 5 whys further detailed the reasons for continuation of norm-referenced grading to facilitate selection, including the need for efficient screening in residency selection, dependence upon rank-order lists, perception that there is a best outcome to the match, lack of trust between residency programs and medical schools, and inadequate resources to support progression of trainees. Based on these findings, the authors argue that the implied purpose of assessment in UME is primarily stratification for residency selection. Because stratification requires comparison, a norm-referenced approach is needed. To advance CBME, the authors recommend reconsideration of the approach to assessment in UME to maintain the purpose of selection while also advancing the purpose of rendering a competency decision. Changing the approach will require a collaboration between national organizations, accrediting bodies, GME programs, UME programs, students, and patients/societies. Details are provided regarding the specific approaches required of each key constituent group.

Twelve tips for providing academic remediation to widening access learners in medical education

As medical schools expand access and diversity through widening access initiatives, there is an increasing need to provide academic remediation for learners during their first year in medical school. The previous educational experiences of widening access learners are often mismatched for continuing success in medical school. This article offers 12 tips for providing academic remediation to widening access learners and draws on insights from the learning sciences and research in psychosocial education to support academic development within a holistic framework.

The Application of Adaptive Minimum Match k-Nearest Neighbors to Identify At-Risk Students in Health Professions Education

INTRODUCTION

When learners fail to reach milestones, educators often wonder if any warning signs could have allowed them to intervene sooner. Machine learning can predict which students are at risk for failing a high-stakes certification examination. If predictions can be made well before the examination, educators can meaningfully intervene before students take the examination to reduce their chances of failing.

METHODS

The authors used already-collected, first-year student assessment data from 5 cohorts in a single Master of Physician Assistant Studies program to implement an "adaptive minimum match" version of the k-nearest neighbors algorithm using changing numbers of neighbors to predict each student's future examination scores on the Physician Assistant National Certifying Exam (PANCE). Validation occurred in 2 ways by using leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV) and by evaluating predictions in a new cohort.

RESULTS

"Adaptive minimum match" version of the k-nearest neighbors algorithm achieved an accuracy of 93% in LOOCV. "Adaptive minimum match" version of the k-nearest neighbors algorithm generates a predicted PANCE score for each student one year before they take the examination. Students are classified into extra support, optional extra support, or no extra support categories. Then, one year remains to provide appropriate support to each category of student.

DISCUSSION

Predictive analytics can identify at-risk students who might need additional support or remediation before high-stakes certification examinations. Educators can use the included methods and code to generate predicted test outcomes for students. The authors recommend that educators use predictive modeling responsibly and transparently, as one of many tools used to support students. More research is needed to test alternative machine learning methods across a variety of educational programs.

The Problematic Persistence of Tiered Grading in Medical School

Issue: The evaluation of medical students is a critical, complex, and controversial process. It is tightly woven into the medical school curriculum, beginning at the inception of the medical student's professional journey. In this respect, medical student evaluation is among the first in a series of ongoing, lifelong assessments that influence the interpersonal, ethical, and socioeconomic dimensions necessary for an effective physician workforce. Yet, tiered grading has a questionable historic pedagogic basis in American medical education, and evidence suggests that tiered grading itself is a source of student burnout, anxiety, depression, increased competitiveness, reduced group cohesion, and racial biases. Evidence: In its most basic form, medical student evaluation is an assessment of the initial cognitive and technical competencies ultimately needed for the safe and effective practice of contemporary medicine. At many American medical schools, such evaluation relies largely on norm-based comparisons, such as tiered grading. Yet, tiered grading can cause student distress, is considered unfair by most students, is associated with biases against under-represented minorities, and demonstrates inconsistent correlation with residency performance. While arguments that tiered grading motivates student performance have enjoyed historic precedence in academia, such arguments are not supported by robust data or theories of motivation. Implications: Given the evolving recognition of the deleterious effects on medical student mental health, cohesiveness, and diversity, the use of tiered grading in medical schools to measure or stimulate academic performance, or by residency program directors to distinguish residency applicants, remains questionable. Examination of tiered grading in its historical, psychometric, psychosocial, and moral dimensions and the various arguments used to maintain it reveals a need for investigation of, if not transition to, alternative and non-tiered assessments of our medical students.

Envisioning the Future of Student Success: Report of the 2022-2023 AACP Student Affairs Standing Committee

Over the past several years, traditional metrics have indicated declining student success within colleges and schools of pharmacy. Though students may be less well-prepared for professional school than in years past, once candidates are admitted to our institutions, we have a responsibility to effectively support their progression through the program. The 2022-2023 Student Affairs Committee was convened to evaluate and advance the construct of student success within Doctor of Pharmacy programs. The Student Affairs Committee was charged with identifying environmental factors affecting the ability of pharmacy students to be successful; determining how colleges and schools of pharmacy are currently meeting needs related to student progress; conducting a literature review to determine what academic support measures minimize attrition; and developing innovative suggestions and recommendations that better support student success. To accomplish this work, we conducted an extensive literature review and synthesis of evidence, engaged in professional networking across the Academy, and administered a wide-ranging student success survey to all colleges and schools of pharmacy. In this report, we explore the complex and interacting systems that affect learning behavior and academic success and offer a novel, comprehensive description of how the Academy is currently responding to challenges of academic and student success. Additionally, we envision the future of student success, offering 7 recommendations to the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy and 5 suggestions to members of the Academy to advance this vision.

WR, Farrell SE, Hundert EM, Dalrymple JL, Goldhamer MEJ. A pilot clinical skills coaching program to reimagine remediation: a cohort study

Background New approaches are needed to improve and destigmatize remediation in undergraduate medical education (UME).  The COVID-19 pandemic magnified the need to support struggling learners to ensure competency and readiness for graduate medical education (GME).  Clinical skills (CS) coaching is an underutilized approach that may mitigate the stigma of remedial learning. Methods A six-month CS coaching pilot was conducted at Harvard Medical School (HMS) as a destigmatized remedial learning environment for clerkship and post-clerkship students identified as 'at risk' based on objective structured clinical examinations (OSCE).  The pilot entailed individual and group coaching with five faculty, direct bedside observation of CS, and standardized patient encounters with video review. Strengths-based coaching principles and appreciative inquiry were emphasized.  Results Twenty-three students participated in the pilot: 14 clerkship students (cohort 1) and 9 post-clerkship students (cohort 2).  All clerkship students (cohort 1) demonstrated sustained improvement in CS across three OSCEs compared to baseline: at pilot close, at 6-months post pilot, and at 21-24 months post-pilot all currently graduating students (10/10, 100%) passed the summative OSCE, an HMS graduation requirement. All post-clerkship students (cohort 2) passed the HMS graduation OSCE (9/9,100%). Feedback survey results included clerkship students (9/14; 64%) and post-clerkship students (7/9; 78%); all respondents unanimously agreed that individual coaching was "impactful to my clinical learning and practice". Faculty and leadership fully supported the pilot as a destigmatized and effective approach to remediation.  Conclusion Remediation has an essential and growing role in medical schools.  CS coaching for remedial learning can reduce stigma, foster a growth mindset, and support sustained progress for 'at risk' early clerkship through final year students. An "implementation template" with suggested tools and timelines can be locally adapted to guide CS coaching for UME remediation. The CS coaching pilot model is feasible and can be generalized to many UME programs.

Design of a Learning Development Program to Support First-Year Undergraduate Medical Students in the Transition to a PBL Curriculum

While the evaluation of learning development interventions needs to be considered carefully and included at the curriculum design stage, there is limited literature on the actual design of interventions, especially on how these designs evolve and improve over time. This paper describes the evolution of a learning development program intended to support first-year medical students adjusting to a problem-based learning curriculum. We used a design-based research approach, articulating our theoretical grounding and incorporating students' voices to develop an "optimal" intervention for the specific challenges in our context. We describe lessons learned around four aspects: students' growth and development, teachers' professional growth and development, program design principles, and the emergent components of a learning development program. Overall, our students describe the Learning Success Program as adding value by enabling the adoption of a repertoire of skills and strategies for learning management. Additionally, the incremental nature of design-based research allowed for the development of a context-specific program that considers students' voices through needs assessment and feedback on the program offerings. It has also provided an opportunity for the professional development of teachers through feedback from classroom practice, reflection, and the literature.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-023-01790-3.

Using document phenomenology to investigate academic failure among year 1 undergraduate Malaysian medical students

BACKGROUND

Academic failure is common among medical schools worldwide. However, the process behind this failure itself is underexplored. A deeper understanding of this phenomenon may avert the vicious cycle of academic failure. Hence, this study investigated the process of academic failure among medical students in Year 1.

METHODS

This study employed a document phenomenological approach, which is a systematic process to examine documents, interpret them to attain understanding, and develop empirical knowledge of the phenomenon studied. Using document analysis, interview transcripts and reflective essays of 16 Year 1 medical students who experienced academic failure were analysed. Based on this analysis, codes were developed and further reduced into categories and themes. Thirty categories in eight themes were linked to make sense of the series of events leading to academic failure.

RESULTS

One or more critical incidents commenced during the academic year, which led to possible resulting events. The students had poor attitudes, ineffective learning methods, health problems or stress. Students progressed to mid-year assessments and reacted differently to their results in the assessments. Afterwards, the students tried different types of attempts, and they still failed the end-of-year assessments. The general process of academic failure is illustrated in a diagram describing chronological events.

CONCLUSION

Academic failure may be explained by a series of events (and consequences) of what students experience and do and how they respond to their experiences. Preventing a preceding event may prevent students from suffering these consequences.

The role of feedback in supporting trainees who underperform in clinical environments

Introduction

Underperformance in clinical environments can be costly and emotional for all stakeholders. Feedback is an important pedagogical strategy for working with underperformance - both formal and informal strategies can make a difference. Feedback is a typical feature of remediation programs, and yet there is little consensus on how feedback should unfold in the context of underperformance.

Methods

This narrative review synthesises literature at the intersections of feedback and underperformance in clinical environments where service, learning and safety need to be considered. We do so with a critical eye towards generating insights for working with underperformance in the clinical environment.

Synthesis and discussion

There are compounding and multi-level factors that contribute to underperformance and subsequent failure. This complexity overwrites simplistic notions of 'earned' failure through individual traits and deficit. Working with such complexity requires feedback that goes beyond educator input or 'telling'. When we shift beyond feedback as input to process, we recognise that these processes are fundamentally relational, where trust and safety are necessary for trainees to share their weaknesses and doubts. Emotions are always present and they signal action. Feedback literacy might help us consider how to engage trainees with feedback so that they take an active (autonomous) role in developing their evaluative judgements. Finally, feedback cultures can be influential and take effort to shift if at all. A key mechanism running through all these considerations of feedback is enabling internal motivation, and creating conditions for trainees to feel relatedness, competence and autonomy. Broadening our perceptions of feedback, beyond telling, might help create environments for learning to flourish.

Shifting the narrative and practice of assessing professionalism in dietetics education: An Australasian qualitative study

AIM

We aimed to explore current approaches to assessing professionalism in dietetics education in Australia and New Zealand, and asked the questions what is working well and what needs to improve?

METHOD

We employed a qualitative interpretive approach and conducted interviews with academic and practitioner (workplace-based) educators (total sample n = 78) with a key stake in dietetics education across Australia and New Zealand. Data were analysed using team-based, framework analysis.

RESULTS

Our findings suggest significant shifts in dietetics education in the area of professionalism assessment. Professionalism assessment is embedded in formal curricula of dietetics programs and is occurring in university and placement settings. In particular, advances have been demonstrated in those programs assessing professionalism as part of the programmatic assessment. Progress has been enabled by philosophical and curricula shifts; clearer articulation and shared understandings of professionalism standards; enhanced learner agency and reduced power distance; early identification and intervention of professionalism lapses; and increased confidence and capabilities of educators.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest there have been considerable advances in professionalism assessment in recent years with shifts in practice in approaching professionalism through a more interpretivist lens, holistically and more student-centred. Professionalism assessment in dietetics education is a shared responsibility and requires further development and transformation to more fully embed and strengthen curricula approaches across programs. Further work should investigate strategies to build safer learning cultures and capacity for professionalism conversations and in strengthening approaches to remediation.

Assisting physicians who exhibit disruptive behavior: Understanding the costs, contributors, and corrections

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this article is to discuss the etiology, prevalence, impact, and management of disruptive behavior in physicians. These various aspects will be examined at both the individual and system level, to provide appropriate perspective and detail effective approaches to address these behaviors.

METHOD

Clinical experience and review of the authors' and other researchers' findings provide consensus on numerous key aspects of physician disruptive behavior.

RESULTS

Physicians demonstrating disruptive behavior are often distressed. The behavior should be understood as arising from biopsychosocial contributors, knowledge gaps, insight, and systems factors. These contributors are inclusive and may interact with each other.

CONCLUSIONS

A comprehensive approach is required which can include assessment/reassessment tools, individualized programming (therapy, coaching, instruction), deliberate practice, medical follow-up, and system intervention. Complications include the diversity of disruptive behaviors, the many contributory factors therein, disagreement about methodology/measurement, and the role of the system.

Improving Learning and Study Strategies in Undergraduate Medical Students: A Pre-Post Study

We aimed to describe the impact of a structured interventional program to improve learning and study skills in undergraduate medical students from a Latin American medical school. The interventional program's design was based on diagnostic/prescriptive assessment test scores measuring ten scales. The program consisted of five tailored workshops. The cohort studied consisted of 81 third-year medical students. The outcome variable was the difference between "pre" and "post" test scores. The unadjusted score percentiles were used to compare improvement in learning and study skills. In addition, a sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess variation in the mean difference of the test scores by the number of workshops attended. The response rate was 100% (81/81) for the pre test and ~77% (62/81) for the post test. After the interventional program, nine out of ten scales showed statistical improvement, except for the scale of motivation. The scales with the highest and lowest percent change improvement were time management (66%, p-value: <0.001) and motivation (14.9%, p-value: 0.06). The students who attended more workshops obtained a higher percent change improvement in the post test. These findings suggest that through a well-designed interventional program, it is possible to improve learning and study skills among medical students.

Curricular changes in times of crisis: Lessons learned

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

During the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic, experiential education became challenging as sites began to cancel scheduled rotations, and the University of Florida College of Pharmacy had to cancel the first advanced pharmacy practice experience (APPE) block. This was allowable given the excess number of experiential hours built into the curriculum.

EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITY AND SETTING

To meet total program credit hour requirements, a six-credit virtual course was created to mimic an experiential rotation. This course was designed to bridge didactic learning with experiential learning. The course included presentation of patient cases, topic discussions, pharmaceutical calculations, self-care cases, disease state management cases, and career development.

FINDINGS

Students provided feedback via a survey containing 23 Likert type questions and four open-ended questions. Most students agreed or strongly agreed that participation in self-care scenarios, small group discussions (calculations and topic discussion), and disease state management cases (preceptor dialogue and verbal defense activities) were valuable learning experiences. The verbal defense portion of the disease management case and the self-care scenarios were the most highly rated learning activities. Peer review activities in the career development assignments were seen as the least beneficial component of the course.

SUMMARY

This course allowed students an opportunity to further prepare for APPEs in a unique learning environment. The college was able to identify students requiring additional support during APPEs and provide earlier intervention. Additionally, data supported exploring incorporation of new learning activities into the current curriculum.

Guidelines: The Do's, Don'ts and Don't Knows of Creating Open Educational Resources

Background

In medical education, there is a growing global demand for Open Educational Resources (OERs). However, OER creators are challenged by a lack of uniform standards. In this guideline, the authors curated the literature on how to produce OERs for medical education with practical guidance on the Do's, Don'ts and Don't Knows for OER creation in order to improve the impact and quality of OERs in medical education.

Methods

We conducted a rapid literature review by searching OVID MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central database using keywords "open educational resources" and "OER". The search was supplemented by hand searching the identified articles' references. We organized included articles by theme and extracted relevant content. Lastly, we developed recommendations via an iterative process of peer review and discussion: evidence-based best practices were designated Do's and Don'ts while gaps were designated Don't Knows. We used a consensus process to quantify evidentiary strength.

Results

The authors performed full text analysis of 81 eligible studies. A total of 15 Do's, Don't, and Don't Knows guidelines were compiled and presented alongside relevant evidence about OERs.

Discussion

OERs can add value for medical educators and their learners, both as tools for expanding teaching opportunities and for promoting medical education scholarship. This summary should guide OER creators in producing high-quality resources and pursuing future research where best practices are lacking.

Differences between high- and low-achieving pre-clinical medical students: a qualitative instrumental case study from a theory of action perspective

BACKGROUND

Poor academic performance and failure can cause undesired effects for students, schools, and society. Understanding why some students fail while their peers succeed is important to enhance student performance. Therefore, this study explores the differences in the learning process between high- and low-achieving pre-clinical medical students from a theory of action perspective.

METHODS

This study employed a qualitative instrumental case study design intended to compare two groups of students-high-achieving students (n = 14) and low-achieving students (n = 5), enrolled in pre-clinical medical studies at the Universiti Malaya, Malaysia. Data were collected through reflective journals and semi-structured interviews. Regarding journaling, participants were required to recall their learning experiences of the previous academic year. Two analysts coded the data and then compared the codes of high- and low-achieving students. The third analyst reviewed the codes. Themes were identified iteratively, working towards comparing the learning processes of high- and low-achieving students.

RESULTS

Data analysis revealed four themes-motivation and expectation, study methods, self-management, and flexibility of mindset. First, high-achieving students were more motivated and had higher academic expectations than low-achieving students. Second, high-achieving students adopted study planning and deep learning approaches, whereas low-achieving students adopted superficial learning approaches. Third, in contrast to low-achieving students, high-achieving students exhibited better time management and studied consistently. Finally, high-achieving students proactively sought external support and made changes to overcome challenges. In contrast, low-achieving students were less resilient and tended to avoid challenges.

CONCLUSION

Based on the theory of action, high-achieving students utilize positive governing variables, whereas low-achieving students are driven by negative governing variables. Hence, governing variable-based remediation is needed to help low-achieving students interrogate the motives behind their actions and realign positive governing variables, actions, and intended outcomes.Key MessagesThis study found four themes describing the differences between high- and low-achieving pre-clinical medical students: motivation and expectation, study methods, self-management, and flexibility of mindset.Based on the theory of action approach, high-achieving pre-clinical medical students are fundamentally different from their low-achieving peers in terms of their governing variables, with the positive governing variables likely to have guided them to act in a manner beneficial to and facilitating desirable academic performance.Governing variable-based remediation may help students interrogate the motives of their actions.

Best Practices for Remediation in Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Fellowship Training

Background

Remediation of struggling learners in pulmonary and critical care fellowship programs is a challenge, even for experienced medical educators.

Objective

This evidence-based narrative review provides a framework program leaders may use to address fellows having difficulty achieving competency during fellowship training.

Methods

The relevant evidence for approaches on the basis of each learner’s needs is reviewed and interpreted in the context of fellowship training in pulmonary medicine and critical care. Issues addressed include bias in fellow assessments and remediation, the impacts of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic, the specific challenges of pulmonary and critical care fellowship programs, a brief review of relevant legal issues, guidance on building and leveraging program resources, and a discussion of learner outcomes.

Results

This results in a concise, evidence-based toolkit for program leaders based around four pillars: early identification, fellow assessment, collaborative intervention, and reassessment. Important concepts also include the need for documentation, clear and written communication, and fellow-directed approaches to the creation of achievable goals.

Conclusion

Evidence-based remediation helps struggling learners in pulmonary and critical care fellowship to improve their ability to meet Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) milestones.

When the wheels fall off - Medical students' experiences of interrupted academic progression

INTRODUCTION

There is limited published research on medical students' perspectives of a significant interruption to their academic progression. This study sought to identify the factors that contribute to difficulties with academic progression and to understand how medical students successfully respond.

METHODS

This interpretive phenomenological study reports on the findings from in-depth interviews of 38 final year medical students who had experienced a significant academic interruption.

RESULTS

The two superordinate themes were: the factors contributing to the interruption and their experience of the interruption. Factors identified as contributing to the interruption were: workload, learning in medicine, motivation for medicine, isolation, adapting to local culture, health and external factors. Their experience of the interruption focused on stages of working through the process: 'what happened,' 'how it felt,' 'managing the failure,' 'accepting the failure' and 'making some changes.'

DISCUSSION

Each factor affected how the participants reacted and responded to the interruption. Regardless of the origins of the interruption, most reacted and responded in a comparable process, albeit with varying timespans. These reactions and responses were in a state of fluctuation. In order to succeed many stated they shifted their motivation from external to internal, in direct response to the interruption, resulting in changed learning behaviours.

CONCLUSIONS

The process of working through an interruption to academic progression for students may benefit from a model of interval debriefing, restorative academic and personal development support. Facilitation of this process could enable students to face an interruption constructively rather than as an insurmountable emotionally burdensome barrier. Medical schools could utilise these findings to implement further support strategies to reduce the number of significant academic disruptions.

The life raft to keep students afloat: Early detection, supplemental instruction, tutoring, and self-directed remediation

PROBLEM DESCRIPTION

To decrease delayed graduation and student dismissal, we developed a systematic process to identify and intervene with students with academic challenge across the first three years of the curriculum.

QUALITY IMPROVEMENT METHODS

Four strategies were implemented to support student academic success: early identification of academic challenge, supplemental instruction, tutoring, and remediation. Outcomes were tracked through the number of students requiring remediation, academic performance during remediation, and changes in delayed graduation and academic dismissal.

RESULTS OF CQI INQUIRY

The number of students requiring remediation has decreased each year since implementation in 2017 to 2020 (54, 36, 30, and 21, respectively). The rate of successful remediation has ranged from 72% to 87%. Strategies to support student success have resulted in decreased delayed graduation and academic dismissal.

INTERPRETATION AND DISCUSSION

Commitment to academic success was a culmination of resources to support students, including the investment in an academic performance specialist and paid supplemental instructors. A focus on student success has led to awareness of additional strategies that may be employed to enhance the student support program. These include creating a culture of no shame for receiving academic support and mandating some activities for students who do not maintain a minimum threshold.

CONCLUSIONS

A holistic approach to academically support students that included preventive and interventional strategies was successful in decreasing delayed graduation and academic dismissal.

Ambivalent professional identity of early remedial medical students from Generation Z: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Supporting professional identity development in medical students undergoing remediation in the first few years of their studies is an important topic. However, there is a lack of research on developing an effective and individualised process for successful remediation that targets learner identities. This study examined the identities of Generation Z remedial medical students through the lens of professional identity formation, focusing on the difficulties they faced and the support they sought.

METHODS

An exploratory qualitative case study was conducted within a constructivist paradigm. Twenty-two medical students (14 males and 8 females) who had experienced remediation in their first few years of medical university participated in this study. All participants were members of Generation Z. Qualitative data were collected through face-to-face, semi-structured interviews and analysed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Medical students undergoing remediation in the first few years experienced resistance to the medical profession and conflict due to the gap between the ideal and the reality they experienced after entering medical university. Students' professional identities were closely intertwined with their pre-university identities; this affected the process of professional identity formation after entering medical university. They preferred assurances of confidentiality as a prerequisite and immediately sought advice through social networks to support their professional identity development.

CONCLUSIONS

When planning professional identity development support for Generation Z medical students undergoing remediation in the first few years, it is necessary to carefully select integrative interaction methods, focus on the context of individual learners, and collaboratively discuss specific responses between students and faculty. The results of this study could be useful to faculty in developing support systems for future remedial medical students that focuses on professional identity development and mentoring of remedial medical students.

Considerations for remediation policy and procedures in pharmacy education

INTRODUCTION

Despite the heterogeneous nature of remediation definitions, processes, and impact on learning, it is commonly understood as a process for identifying student deficiencies in knowledge, skills, and attitudes that need to be corrected prior to student progression in the program.

COMMENTARY

Current issues related to remediation in pharmacy education include inconsistencies in practices and types within and among institutions, a lack of correlation to student academic success, effects on attrition both positive (student staying on-time for graduation) and negative (students sitting back one year), increase in faculty workload, and negativity or stigma associated with the student.

IMPLICATIONS

Key considerations in developing and implementing remediation policies and procedures include being student-focused, providing a positive frame for remediation, implementing a clear process, and early identification of students who need help.

Post graduate remediation programs in medicine: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Recognizing that physicians may struggle to achieve knowledge, skills, attitudes and or conduct at one or more stages during their training has highlighted the importance of the 'deliberate practice of improving performance through practising beyond one's comfort level under guidance'. However, variations in physician, program, contextual and healthcare and educational systems complicate efforts to create a consistent approach to remediation. Balancing the inevitable disparities in approaches and settings with the need for continuity and effective oversight of the remediation process, as well as the context and population specific nature of remediation, this review will scrutinise the remediation of physicians in training to better guide the design, structuring and oversight of new remediation programs.

METHODS

Krishna's Systematic Evidence Based Approach is adopted to guide this Systematic Scoping Review (SSR in SEBA) to enhance the transparency and reproducibility of this review. A structured search for articles on remediation programs for licenced physicians who have completed their pre-registration postings and who are in training positions published between 1st January 1990 and 31st December 2021 in PubMed, Scopus, ERIC, Google Scholar, PsycINFO, ASSIA, HMIC, DARE and Web of Science databases was carried out. The included articles were concurrently thematically and content analysed using SEBA's Split Approach. Similarities in the identified themes and categories were combined in the Jigsaw Perspective and compared with the tabulated summaries of included articles in the Funnelling Process to create the domains that will guide discussions.

RESULTS

The research team retrieved 5512 abstracts, reviewed 304 full-text articles and included 101 articles. The domains identified were characteristics, indications, frameworks, domains, enablers and barriers and unique features of remediation in licenced physicians in training programs.

CONCLUSION

Building upon our findings and guided by Hauer et al. approach to remediation and Taylor and Hamdy's Multi-theories Model, we proffer a theoretically grounded 7-stage evidence-based remediation framework to enhance understanding of remediation in licenced physicians in training programs. We believe this framework can guide program design and reframe remediation's role as an integral part of training programs and a source of support and professional, academic, research, interprofessional and personal development.

Remediation in Practice: A Polarity to be Managed

Originally developed in the business literature, a polarity is a concept where 2 distinctive and opposing characteristics (poles), each presenting advantages and disadvantages or opportunities and pitfalls, must both be taken into account to ensure effective management of a challenging problem. Managing a polarity is a thorny endeavor because it entails striving to maximize the benefits of both poles while simultaneously minimizing or controlling the downsides of each. Previous investigations into stakeholder conceptualizations of remediation led us to suggest that remediation is framed in stakeholders' minds simultaneously as an educational endeavor (ie, the remediatee needs educational support to regain full competence) and a regulatory act (ie, the revocation of the individual's professional right to self-regulate their practice and learning). In this article, we argue that viewing remediation for practicing physicians as a polarity to be managed offers a framework that can further the conversation about how to address some of remediation's challenges.

Characterization of Clinical Skills Remediation: A National Survey of Medical Schools

OBJECTIVES

Clinical skills instruction is a standard part of medical school curricula, but how institutions address learners who struggle in this area is less clear. Although recommendations for the remediation of clinical skills at an institutional level have been published, how these recommendations are being implemented on a national scale is unknown. In this descriptive study, we characterize current clinical skills remediation practices at US medical schools and US-accredited Caribbean medical schools.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional survey of medical educators who work with struggling students. From March 24, 2020 to April 9, 2020, the Directors of Clinical Skills Remediation Working Group conducted an e-mail survey incorporating four aspects of remediation program design and function: identification, assessment, active remediation, and ongoing evaluation.

RESULTS

In total, 92 individuals representing 45 institutions provided descriptive information about their respective remediation programs. The majority of respondents have a formal process of identifying (75%) and assessing (86%) students who are identified as struggling with clinical skills, but lack a standardized method of categorizing deficits. Fewer institutions have a standardized approach to active remediation and ongoing evaluation of struggling learners. Fifty-two percent of institutions provide training to faculty involved in the remediation process.

CONCLUSIONS

Although most institutions are able to identify struggling students, they lack a standardized approach to intervene. Remediation effectiveness is limited by a lack of student buy-in and institutional time, expertise, and resources. These findings highlight the need for more formalized structure and standardization in remediation program design and implementation.

Clinical Skills Tutoring Program (CSTP): Developing a Curriculum for Medical Student Clinical Skills Peer Tutors

INTRODUCTION

There are few curriculum materials designed to provide training and support for peer tutors to become effective clinical skills teachers. We designed the Clinical Skills Tutoring Program (CSTP) curriculum to guide tutors to help their students reflect on clinical skills performance, create an individualized learning plan, and engage in improvement based on feedback to achieve clinical skills competencies.

METHODS

Curriculum content was delivered through an in-person training session, formal curriculum written content, online resources, and longitudinal support from faculty directors. Tutors (fourth-year medical students) received surveys to evaluate the in-person training session, curriculum resources, and overall program experience. Student participants (medical students of any year) completed a survey to rate their satisfaction in working with their tutors.

RESULTS

There were 12 tutors in cohort 1 and 18 tutors in cohort 2. Survey response rates ranged from 50% to 70% among tutors. The tutors were satisfied with the in-person training session, program experience, curriculum resources, support from directors, development of learning goals with the student, and clinical skills practice with the student (mean Likert ratings greater than 4 out of 5). Student participants were satisfied with their experience creating learning goals and receiving feedback from their tutors.

DISCUSSION

The tutor curriculum fills a gap by training and supporting tutors before and during their work with students needing further resources and remediation in one or more clinical skills domains. The curriculum can be implemented and further adapted by other tutoring programs locally and nationally.