A Novel Dual-Frequency Deep Brain Stimulation Paradigm for Parkinson's Disease

Review of directional leads, stimulation patterns and programming strategies for deep brain stimulation

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a well-established treatment for both neurological and psychiatric disorders. Directional DBS has the potential to minimize stimulation-induced side effects and maximize clinical benefits. Many new directional leads, stimulation patterns and programming strategies have been developed in recent years. Therefore, it is necessary to review new progress in directional DBS. This paper summarizes progress for directional DBS from the perspective of directional DBS leads, stimulation patterns, and programming strategies which are three key elements of DBS systems. Directional DBS leads are reviewed in electrode design and volume of tissue activated visualization strategies. Stimulation patterns are reviewed in stimulation parameters and advances in stimulation patterns. Programming strategies are reviewed in computational modeling, monopolar review, direction indicators and adaptive DBS. This review will provide a comprehensive overview of primary directional DBS leads, stimulation patterns and programming strategies, making it helpful for those who are developing DBS systems.

A framework for translational therapy development in deep brain stimulation

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established treatment for motor disorders like Parkinson's disease, but its mechanisms and effects on neurons and networks are not fully understood, limiting research-driven progress. This review presents a framework that combines neurophysiological insights and translational research to enhance DBS therapy, emphasizing biomarkers, device technology, and symptom-specific neuromodulation. It also examines the role of animal research in improving DBS, while acknowledging challenges in clinical translation.

Programming Algorithm for the Management of Speech Impairment in Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease

OBJECTIVES

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) for Parkinson's disease (PD) has an ambiguous relation to speech. Speech impairment can be a stimulation-induced side effect, and parkinsonian dysarthria can improve with STN-DBS. Owing to the lack of an up-to-date and evidence-based approach, DBS reprogramming for speech impairment is largely blind and greatly relies on the physician's experience. In this study, we aimed to establish an evidence- and experience-based algorithm for managing speech impairment in patients with PD treated with STN-DBS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a single-center retrospective study to identify patients with STN-DBS and speech impairment. Onset of speech impairment, lead localization, and assessment of DBS-induced nature of speech impairment were collected. When DBS settings were adjusted for improving speech, the magnitude and duration of effect were collected. We also performed a systematic literature review to identify studies describing the effects of parameter adjustments aimed at improving speech impairment in patients with PD receiving STN-DBS.

RESULTS

In the retrospective study, 245 of 631 patients (38.8%) with STN-DBS had significant speech impairment. The probability of sustained marked improvement upon reprogramming was generally low (27.9%). In the systematic review, 23 of 662 identified studies were included. Only two randomized controlled trials have been performed, providing evidence for interleaving-interlink stimulation only. Considerable methodologic heterogeneity precluded the conduction of a meta-analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Speech impairment in STN-DBS for PD is frequent, but high-quality evidence regarding DBS parameter adjustments is scarce, and the probability of sustained improvement is low. To improve this outcome, we propose an evidence- and experience-based approach to address speech impairment in STN-DBS that can be used in clinical practice.

Alternative patterns of deep brain stimulation in neurologic and neuropsychiatric disorders

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a widely used clinical therapy that modulates neuronal firing in subcortical structures, eliciting downstream network effects. Its effectiveness is determined by electrode geometry and location as well as adjustable stimulation parameters including pulse width, interstimulus interval, frequency, and amplitude. These parameters are often determined empirically during clinical or intraoperative programming and can be altered to an almost unlimited number of combinations. Conventional high-frequency stimulation uses a continuous high-frequency square-wave pulse (typically 130-160 Hz), but other stimulation patterns may prove efficacious, such as continuous or bursting theta-frequencies, variable frequencies, and coordinated reset stimulation. Here we summarize the current landscape and potential clinical applications for novel stimulation patterns.

Deep Brain Stimulation Impact on Voice and Speech Quality in Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has considerable efficacy for the motor dysfunction of idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD) on patient quality of life. However, the benefit of DBS on voice and speech quality remains controversial. We carried out a systematic review to understand the influence of DBS on parkinsonian dysphonia and dysarthria.

DATA SOURCES

A PubMed/MEDLINE and Cochrane systematic review was carried out following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, Timing, and Setting (PICOTS) statements.

REVIEW METHODS

Three investigators screened studies published in the literature from inception to May 2022. The following data were retrieved: age, demographic, sex, disease duration, DBS duration, DBS location, speech, and voice quality measurements.

RESULTS

From the 180 studies identified, 44 publications met the inclusion criteria, accounting for 866 patients. Twenty-nine studies focused on voice/speech quality in subthalamic DBS patients, and 6 included patients with stimulation of pallidal, thalamic, and zona incerta regions. Most studies (4/6) reported a deterioration of the vocal parameters on subjective voice quality evaluation. For speech, the findings were more contrasted. There was an important heterogeneity between studies regarding the voice and speech quality outcomes used to evaluate the impact of DBS on voice/speech quality.

CONCLUSION

The impact of DBS on voice and speech quality significantly varies between studies. The stimulated anatomical region may have a significant role since the stimulation of the pallidal area was mainly associated with voice quality improvement, in contrast with other regions. Future controlled studies comparing all region stimulation are needed to get reliable findings.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III: evidence from evidence summaries developed from systematic reviews.

Long-Term Clinical Experience with Directional Deep Brain Stimulation Programming: A Retrospective Review

INTRODUCTION

Directional deep brain stimulation (d-DBS) axially displaces the volume of tissue activated (VTA) towards the intended target and away from neighboring structures potentially improving benefit and reducing side effects (SE) of stimulation. A clinical trial evaluating d-DBS demonstrated a wider therapeutic window (TW) with directional electrodes. While this seems advantageous, it remains unclear when and why directional stimulation is chosen clinically. To evaluate the implementation of d-DBS in our practice we examined the prevalence of and motivation for directional programming.

METHODS

A retrospective review was completed in consecutive patients with Parkinson's disease (PD)/essential tremor (ET) implanted with the Abbott Infinity system from December 2016 to January 2020. At 3, 12, 24, and 36 months we extracted post-DBS stimulation parameters; use of directional electrodes and other advanced programming techniques; and reasons for directional programming.

RESULTS

Fifty-six patients with PD and 18 patients with ET (104 and 33 leads, respectively) were identified. The numbers of patients programmed with a directional electrode in at least one DBS lead in PD and ET, respectively, were 22/56 (39%) and 13/18 (72%) at 3 months; 19/48 (40%) and 8/12 (67%) at 12 months; 12/31 (39%) and 5/8 (63%) at 24 months; and 6/9 (67%) and 1/2 (50%) at 36 months. In PD and ET, reasons for using directional stimulation were better symptom control, less SE, or combination of better symptom control/SE; additional reasons in ET were improved battery/TW%.

CONCLUSION

Over a 36-month time period 39-68% of patients with PD and 50-72% of patients with ET had at least one lead programmed directionally in order to either improve symptom control or reduce side effects, an option not available with conventional omnidirectional stimulation. Initially directional electrodes were used in ET more frequently than PD, likely because of the less complex nature of programming for a monosymptomatic disorder. However, over time this shifted as we gained directional experience and sought solutions to reduce worsening symptoms.

Deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease: state of the art and future perspectives

For more than 30 years, Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) has been a therapeutic option for Parkinson's disease (PD) treatment. However, this therapy is still underutilized mainly due to misinformation regarding risks and clinical outcomes. DBS can ameliorate several motor and non-motor symptoms, improving patients' quality of life. Furthermore, most of the improvement after DBS is long-lasting and present even in advanced PD. Adequate patient selection, precise electric leads placement, and correct DBS programming are paramount for good surgical outcomes. Nonetheless, DBS still has many limitations: axial symptoms and signs, such as speech, balance and gait, do not improve to the same extent as appendicular symptoms and can even be worsened as a direct or indirect consequence of surgery and stimulation. In addition, there are still unanswered questions regarding patient's selection, surgical planning and programming techniques, such as the role of surgicogenomics, more precise imaging-based lead placement, new brain targets, advanced programming strategies and hardware features. The net effect of these innovations should not only be to refine the beneficial effect we currently observe on selected symptoms and signs but also to improve treatment resistant facets of PD, such as axial and non-motor features. In this review, we discuss the current state of the art regarding DBS selection, implant, and programming, and explore new advances in the DBS field.

Deep brain stimulation for movement disorder treatment: exploring frequency-dependent efficacy in a computational network model

A large-scale computational model of the basal ganglia network and thalamus is proposed to describe movement disorders and treatment effects of deep brain stimulation (DBS). The model of this complex network considers three areas of the basal ganglia region: the subthalamic nucleus (STN) as target area of DBS, the globus pallidus, both pars externa and pars interna (GPe-GPi), and the thalamus. Parkinsonian conditions are simulated by assuming reduced dopaminergic input and corresponding pronounced inhibitory or disinhibited projections to GPe and GPi. Macroscopic quantities are derived which correlate closely to thalamic responses and hence motor programme fidelity. It can be demonstrated that depending on different levels of striatal projections to the GPe and GPi, the dynamics of these macroscopic quantities (synchronisation index, mean synaptic activity and response efficacy) switch from normal to Parkinsonian conditions. Simulating DBS of the STN affects the dynamics of the entire network, increasing the thalamic activity to levels close to normal, while differing from both normal and Parkinsonian dynamics. Using the mentioned macroscopic quantities, the model proposes optimal DBS frequency ranges above 130 Hz.

In silico Accuracy and Energy Efficiency of Two Steering Paradigms in Directional Deep Brain Stimulation

Background: In Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS), stimulation field steering is used to achieve stimulation spatial specificity, which is critical to obtain clinical benefits and avoid side effects. Multiple Independent Current Control (MICC) and Interleaving/Multi Stim Set (Interleaving/MSS) are two stimulation field steering paradigms in commercially available DBS systems. This work investigates the stimulation field steering accuracy and energy efficiency of these two paradigms in directional DBS.

Methods: Volumes of Tissue Activated (VTAs) were generated in silico using pulse widths of 60 μs and five pulse amplitude fractionalizations intended to steer the VTAs radially in 12° steps. For each fractionalization, VTAs were generated with nine pre-defined target radii. Stimulation field steering accuracy was assessed based on the VTAs rotation angle. Energy efficiency was inferred from current draw from battery values, which were calculated based on the pulse amplitudes needed to generate and steer the VTAs, as well as electrode impedance measurements of clinically implanted directional leads.

Results: For radial steering, MICC needed a single VTA. In contrast, Interleaving/MSS required the generation of two VTAs, whose union and intersection created an Interleaving/MSS VTA and an Intersection VTA, respectively. MICC VTAs were 6.8 (−3.2–11.8)% larger than Interleaving/MSS VTAs. The Intersection VTAs accounted for 26.2 (16.0–32.8)% of Interleaving/MSS VTAs and were exposed to a higher stimulation frequency. For all VTA radius-fractionalization combinations, steering accuracy was 7.0 (4.5–10.5)° for MICC and 24.0 (9.0–25.3)° for Interleaving/MSS. Pulse amplitudes were 16.1 (9.2–28.6)% lower for MICC than for Interleaving/MSS, leading to a 45.9 (18.8–72.6)% lower current draw from battery for MICC.

Conclusions: The results of this work show that in silico, MICC achieves a significantly better stimulation field steering accuracy and has a significantly higher energy efficiency than Interleaving/MSS. Although direct evidence still needs to be generated to translate the results of this work to clinical practice, clinical outcomes may profit from the better stimulation field steering accuracy of MICC and longevity of DBS systems may profit from its higher energy efficiency.

Current Directions in Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease-Directing Current to Maximize Clinical Benefit

Several single-center studies and one large multicenter clinical trial demonstrated that directional deep brain stimulation (DBS) could optimize the volume of tissue activated (VTA) based on the individual placement of the lead in relation to the target. The ability to generate axially asymmetric fields of stimulation translates into a broader therapeutic window (TW) compared to conventional DBS. However, changing the shape and surface of stimulating electrodes (directional segmented vs. conventional ring-shaped) also demands a revision of the programming strategies employed for DBS programming. Model-based approaches have been used to predict the shape of the VTA, which can be visualized on standardized neuroimaging atlases or individual magnetic resonance imaging. While potentially useful for optimizing clinical care, these systems remain limited by factors such as patient-specific anatomical variability, postsurgical lead migrations, and inability to account for individual contact impedances and orientation of the systems of fibers surrounding the electrode. Alternative programming tools based on the functional assessment of stimulation-induced clinical benefits and side effects allow one to collect and analyze data from each electrode of the DBS system and provide an action plan of ranked alternatives for therapeutic settings based on the selection of optimal directional contacts. Overall, an increasing amount of data supports the use of directional DBS. It is conceivable that the use of directionality may reduce the need for complex programming paradigms such as bipolar configurations, frequency or pulse width modulation, or interleaving. At a minimum, stimulation through directional electrodes can be considered as another tool to improve the benefit/side effect ratio. At a maximum, directionality may become the preferred way to program because of its larger TW and lower energy consumption.

A Novel DBS Paradigm for Axial Features in Parkinson's Disease: A Randomized Crossover Study

BACKGROUND

High-frequency (130-185 Hz) deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus is more effective for appendicular than axial symptoms in Parkinson's disease (PD). Low-frequency (60-80 Hz) stimulation (LFS) may reduce gait/balance impairment but typically results in worsening appendicular symptoms. We created a "dual-frequency" programming paradigm (interleave-interlink, IL-IL) to address both axial and appendicular symptoms. In IL-IL, 2 overlapping LFS programs are applied to the DBS lead, with the overlapping area focused on the optimal cathode. The nonoverlapping area (LFS) is thought to reduce gait/balance impairment, whereas the overlapping area (high-frequency stimulation, HFS) aims to control appendicular symptoms.

METHODS

We performed a randomized, double-blind crossover trial comparing patients' previously optimized IL-IL and conventional HFS paradigms. Each arm was 2 weeks in duration. The primary outcome measure was the patient/caregiver Modified Clinical Global Impression Severity (CGI-S). Secondary outcome measures included blinded motor evaluations, timed tests, patient/caregiver questionnaires, and Personal KinetiGraphs (PKG).

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients were enrolled, and 20 completed. The patient/caregiver CGI-S for gait/balance (P = 0.01) and appendicular symptom control (P = 0.001), and the blinded rater MDS-UPDRS-III (-5.22, P = 0.02), CGI-S gait/balance (P = 0.01), and CGI-S speech (P = 0.02) were better while on IL-IL. Scores on Parkinson's Disease Quality of Life (P = 0.002) and Freezing-of-Gait Questionnaires (P = 0.04) were better on IL-IL. The Timed-Up-and-Go was 9.8% faster (P = 0.01), with 11.8% reduction in steps (P = 0.001) on IL-IL. There was no difference in PKG bradykinesia (P = 0.18) or tremor (P = 0.23) between paradigms.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results prompt consideration of this novel programming paradigm (IL-IL) for PD patients with axial symptom impairment as a new treatment option for both axial and appendicular symptoms. © 2020 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.