Ceftazidime/Avibactam-Based Versus Polymyxin B-Based Therapeutic Regimens for the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Infection in Critically Ill Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Efficacy, Safety, and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Ceftazidime-Avibactam versus Polymyxin B in the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Infections: A Target Trial Emulation

INTRODUCTION

Treatment options for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) infections are limited, with polymyxin B (PMB) and ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) being among the available choices. However, research on these options is scarce and significantly heterogeneous. This study aims to analyze the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of PMB and CZA within a standardized target trial emulation (TTE) framework.

METHODS

This retrospective study emulated a target trial to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of CZA versus PMB for treating CRE infections. Conducted at Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, this study included adult patients treated with CZA or PMB from July 2020 to December 2022. Data on demographics, treatment outcomes, and costs were collected. The primary outcomes included clinical cure, incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs), and cost-effectiveness. Secondary outcomes assessed 28-day all-cause mortality, microbiological eradication rates, incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI), and gastrointestinal events. The outcomes were assessed using the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) effects, per-protocol effects, and propensity score overlap weighting (PSOW) methods.

RESULTS

Between July 1, 2020, and December 31, 2022, 492 hospitalized patients treated with CZA or PMB were screened at Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital. Following inclusion and exclusion criteria, 176 patients were included in the mITT analysis, and 153 in the per-protocol analysis. The clinical cure rate was significantly higher in the CZA group compared to the PMB group across all analyses. The 28-day mortality was similar between groups, while the microbial eradication rate was significantly higher in the CZA group compared to the PMB group across all analyses. The incidence of ADRs was consistent between groups, but AKI occurred more frequently in PMB patients, while gastrointestinal events were more common in the CZA group. The CZA strategy demonstrated a 28.1% increase in efficacy, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 71,651.76 yuan. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of these findings.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that CZA has a higher clinical cure rate compared to PMB within a standard TTE framework. However, the overall incidence of ADRs was similar between the two treatments. Pharmacoeconomic analysis also indicated that CZA is cost-effective.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

https://www.chictr.org.cn ; identifier, ChiCTR2300067946.

Comparing ceftazidime/avibactam and polymyxin B for treating carbapenem-resistant organisms infections: A propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND AND AIM

There are limited comparative studies of ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ/AVI) vs. polymyxin B (PMB) for carbapenem-resistant organisms (CRO) infections. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of CAZ/AVI and PMB in treating CRO infections.

METHODS

This single-centre, retrospective cohort study with propensity score-matching (PSM) involved adult patients with CRO infections. Patients who received the CAZ/AVI-based regimen were included in the cohort group; those prescribed with the PMB-based regimen were included in the control group. The primary outcome was 28-day all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

Among 298 eligible patients, 96 patients in each group were included in the PSM cohort. The CAZ/AVI group showed no improvement in 28-day or 14-day all-cause mortality, nor in 14-day clinical response, compared to the PMB group. However, the CAZ/AVI-based regimen was associated with higher 14-day clinical response rates than the PMB-based regimen in subgroups with carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) infections and monotherapy. The CAZ/AVI group achieved greater CRO eradication than the PMB group (crude odds ratio [OR], 1.658; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.108-2.480; P = 0.014; adjusted OR, 1.718; 95% CI, 1.055-2.798; P = 0.030). This advantage in CRO eradication with CAZ/AVI was consistent in most subgroups, including septic shock, bloodstream infection and lower respiratory tract infection. The CAZ/AVI and PMB groups had comparable nephrotoxicity (crude OR, 0.577; 95% CI, 0.306-1.089; P = 0.090; adjusted OR, 0.741; 95% CI, 0.361-1.521; P = 0.414).

CONCLUSION

CAZ/AVI-based and PMB-based regimens demonstrated similar clinical efficacy and nephrotoxicity in treating CRO infections. However, CAZ/AVI was superior to PMB in CRO eradication and treating CRPA infections. CAZ/AVI monotherapy was more effective than PMB monotherapy for CRO infections.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ChiCTR2300078790 prospectively registered on 19 Dec 2023 (https://www.chictr.org.cn).

Impact of Antibiotic Therapy with Ceftazidime Avibactam vs. Best Available Therapy in Adult Patients with Bacteremia Caused by Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales

Background/Objectives: Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) infection is associated with a higher mortality rate. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of ceftazidime avibactam (CZA) for treating bacteremia caused by CRE compared to the best available therapy in an area where these microorganisms are endemic. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of patients with CRE bacteremia was conducted. We included adults with CRE bacteremia who were treated with CZA or the best available therapy (BAT) for more than 48 h, and the hospitalization time was recorded. The outcomes included death during hospitalization, relapse, and microbiological cure. Confounders were adjusted using propensity score-derived stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Results: A total of 169 patients with CRE bacteremia were included. About 72.6% of isolates had a class A serin carbapenamase, and 20.4% had metallo-β-lactamase co-production. A total of 107 patients were treated with CZA, 63% in monotherapy and 32% with aztreonam (ATM). Crude mortality during hospitalization was 36 (34.5%) in patients treated with CZA and 21 (33.2%) with BAT. No difference was observed between death rates (HR 0.86: IC 95% 0.40-1.83), microbiological cure (OR 1.31 IC 95% 0.46-3.67), clinical response (OR 1.39 IC 95% 0.35-5.43), acute kidney injury (OR 0.56 IC 95% 0.11-2.80) or relapse (OR 0.99 IC 95% 0.17-5.51) during the hospitalization after the adjustment. Conclusions: Among adult patients with CRE, no differences were observed between treatments with CZA and BAT after adjustment with IPTW.

A comparative study of ceftazidime/avibactam-based and fosfomycin plus meropenem-based regimens for managing infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in critically ill patients

The main aim of this study was to compare and analyze the effectiveness of treatment regimens using ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ/AVI) versus fosfomycin plus meropenem (FOS/MER) for managing bloodstream infections (BSI) or ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) caused by carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) in critically ill patients. Between 4 January 2019, and 16 July 2023, adult patients (≥18 years old) diagnosed with BSI or VAP due to culture confirmed CRKP in ICU of a tertiary care hospital were investigated retrospectively. A total of 71 patients were categorized into two groups: 30 patients in CAZ/AVI-based, and 41 patients in FOS/MER-based group. No substantial disparities were found in the total duration of ICU hospitalization, as well as the 14- and 30-day mortality rates, between patients treated with CAZ/AVI-based and FOS/MER-based therapeutic regimens. We consider that our study provides for the first time a comprehensive understanding of treatment outcomes and associated risk factors among patients with CRKP-related infections.

Ceftazidime/avibactam versus polymyxin B in carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infections: a propensity score-matched multicenter real-world study

OBJECTIVES

In this retrospective observational multicenter study, we aimed to assess efficacy and mortality between ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ/AVI) or polymyxin B (PMB)-based regimens for the treatment of Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) infections, as well as identify potential risk factors.

METHODS

A total of 276 CRKP-infected patients were enrolled in our study. Binary logistic and Cox regression analysis with a propensity score-matched (PSM) model were performed to identify risk factors for efficacy and mortality.

RESULTS

The patient cohort was divided into PMB-based regimen group (n = 98, 35.5%) and CAZ/AVI-based regimen group (n = 178, 64.5%). Compared to the PMB group, the CAZ/AVI group exhibited significantly higher rates of clinical efficacy (71.3% vs. 56.1%; p = 0.011), microbiological clearance (74.7% vs. 41.4%; p < 0.001), and a lower incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) (13.5% vs. 33.7%; p < 0.001). Binary logistic regression revealed that the treatment duration independently influenced both clinical efficacy and microbiological clearance. Vasoactive drugs, sepsis/septic shock, APACHE II score, and treatment duration were identified as risk factors associated with 30-day all-cause mortality. The CAZ/AVI-based regimen was an independent factor for good clinical efficacy, microbiological clearance, and lower AKI incidence.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with CRKP infection, the CAZ/AVI-based regimen was superior to the PMB-based regimen.

Efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam with or without polymyxin for carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infections after initial treatment with polymyxin

Although polymyxins are a suboptimal option for difficult-to-treat resistant infections, they are still preferred as the first-line treatment, especially in low- and middle-income countries. This study assesses the efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) following polymyxin B failure in patients with carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) infections. We retrospectively reviewed cases of infections caused by CRKP in adults who received CAZ-AVI as salvage therapy. Clinical features and outcomes were described, and a logistic regression model was used to assess the risk factors associated with in-hospital crude mortality. One hundred and six patients were included in this study. The median age was 56 years. The most common infectious sites were lung. The patients received CAZ-AVI as salvage therapy for a median duration of 9 days following initial treatment with polymyxin B (median, 12.5 days). Also, 91 (85.8%) patients received CAZ-AVI combination therapy, and 34 (32.1%) patients received CAZ-AVI in combination with polymyxin B. The rate of in-hospital crude mortality was 25.5% (27/106), with the highest rate observed in patients treated with regimens containing polymyxin B (41.2%; 14/34). Therapeutic response was observed in 81 (76.4%) patients, with microbiological eradication achieved in 77.1% (74/96) of cases. Multivariable analysis identified that the length of intensive care unit stays, the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score at CAZ-AVI withdrawal, and regimens containing polymyxin B were independently associated with in-hospital mortality, whereas the duration of CAZ-AVI treatment was independently associated with survival. CAZ-AVI salvage therapy demonstrated improved survival outcomes in patients who experienced failure with polymyxin B therapy.IMPORTANCEFor patients with carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) infections, published experience with salvage therapy is limited after the failure of polymyxin-based initial therapy. Here, we found that ceftazidime-avibactam salvage therapy for patients with CRKP infections offers benefit in mortality.

Advances in the clinical treatment of multidrug-resistant pathogens using polymyxins

OBJECTIVES

Polymyxins are a vital class of antibiotics used to combat multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. However, their use is limited due to potential nephrotoxicity and the availability of alternative antibiotics. This review aims to examine the properties of polymyxins and the clinical advances in their use for treating infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB).

METHODS

This review analyses literature on polymyxin properties and various clinical approaches, including intravenous drip infusion, nebulized or dry powder inhalation, and ointment application. Treatment efficacy in terms of bacterial eradication, cure rate and mortality rate are reviewed and evaluated.

RESULTS

Polymyxins have been reintroduced to treat critical infections due to the increasing prevalence of CR-GNB. Clinical trials and studies have confirmed that polymyxins can effectively treat CR-GNB infections when the formulation and administration are appropriate, with acceptable levels of nephrotoxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

In the future, the development of polymyxin formulations will aim to improve their clinical effectiveness while reducing toxicity and side effects and preventing the emergence of polymyxin-resistant strains. Enhanced efficacy and minimized potential side effects can be achieved by developing new polymyxin-delivery systems that provide a smart and controlled release or customized patient administration.

Ceftazidime-avibactam combination therapy versus monotherapy for treating carbapenem-resistant gram-negative infection: a systemic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This meta-analysis was conducted to compare the efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam combination therapy with that of monotherapy in the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacterial (CR-GNB).

METHODS

A literature search of PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov was conducted until September 1, 2023. Only studies that compared CZA combination therapy with monotherapy for CR-GNB infections were included.

RESULTS

A total of 25 studies (23 retrospective observational studies and 2 prospective studies) involving 2676 patients were included. There was no significant difference in 30-day mortality between the study group receiving combination therapy and the control group receiving monotherapy (risk ratio [RR] 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.71-1.18). In addition, no significant differences were observed between the study and the control group in terms of in-hospital mortality (RR 1.00; 95% CI 0.79-1.27), 14-day mortality (RR 1.54; 95% CI 0.24-9.91), 90-day mortality (RR 1.18; 95% CI 0.62-2.22), and clinical cure rate (RR 0.95; 95% CI 0.84-1.08). However, the combination group had a borderline higher microbiological eradication rate than the control group (RR 1.15; 95% CI 1.00-1.32).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to monotherapy, CZA combination therapy did not yield additional clinical benefits. However, combination therapy may be associated with favorable microbiological outcomes.

Efficiency of polymyxin B treatment against nosocomial infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Some cohort studies have explored the effects and safety of polymyxin B (PMB) in comparison to other antibiotics for the treatment of nosocomial infections, yielding inconsistent results. This systematic review aims to explore the effectiveness and safety of PMB and compared it with other antibiotics.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, searching specific terms to identify quantitative cohort studies or RCTs that compared the effects of PMB with other antibiotics in terms of their efficacy and safety. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was conducted to evaluate the risk of bias of observational studies. Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were used for outcome assessment. We evaluated heterogeneity using the I 2 test.

RESULTS

A total of 22 observational trials were included in the analysis. The PMB group had a higher mortality rate compared to the control group (odds ratio: 1.84, 95% CI: 1.36-2.50, p<0.00001, I 2 = 73%). while, the ceftazidime-avibactam group demonstrated a distinct advantage with lower mortality rates, despite still exhibiting high heterogeneity (odds ratio 2.73, 95% confidence interval 1.59-4.69; p = 0.0003; I 2 = 53%). Additionally, the PMB group had a lower nephrotoxicity rate compared to the colistin group but exhibited high heterogeneity in the results (odds ratio 0.58, 95% CI 0.36-0.93; p = 0.02; I 2 = 73%).

CONCLUSION

In patients with nosocomial infections, PMB is not superior to other antibiotics in terms of mortality, specifically when compared to ceftazidime-avibactam. However, PMB demonstrated an advantage in terms of nephrotoxicity compared to colistin.

Efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam in the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infections: Focus on solid organ transplantation recipients

INTRODUCTION

Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) is a new option to treat KPC- and OXA-48 carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) infections. However, clinical evidence is limited regarding its use in treating CRKP infections, especially in solid organ transplantation (SOT) recipients. In this study, we assessed the efficacy of CAZ-AVI in treating CRKP infections in both the general population and the SOT recipients in comparison with other antibiotic regimens.

METHODS

This is a single-centre retrospective cohort study of patients admitted between January 1, 2018 and June 30, 2021 with the diagnosis of CRKP infections receiving either CAZ-AVI or other regimens ≥ 72 hours and clinical outcomes were analysed.

RESULTS

Of 200 patients with CRKP infections, 67 received CAZ-AVI, 133 received other regimens, and 50 were SOT recipients. In the SOT cohort, 30 patients received CAZ-AVI, and 20 received other regimens. The overall 30-day mortality was 38% in the SOT cohort. Compared with patients receiving other regimens, CAZ-AVI therapy resulted in lower 30-day mortality (23.3% vs. 60%, P = 0.014) and 90-day mortality (35.7% vs. 86.7%, P = 0.003), higher clinical cure (93.3% vs. 40%, P < 0.001) and microbiological clearance. Similar promising results of CAZ-AVI were also shown in the whole population cohort. Moreover, clinical outcomes of SOT recipients receiving CAZ-AVI were not inferior to those without SOT.

CONCLUSIONS

CAZ-AVI therapy was associated with better clinical outcomes in CRKP infections in both the general population and SOT recipients. Considering the limitations of the present study, well-conducted RCTs are still warranted to confirm these findings.

The Clinical Efficacy of Adding Ceftazidime/Avibactam to Standard Therapy in Treating Infections Caused by Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumonia with blaOXA-48-like Genes

Ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ-AVI) is FDA-approved for managing infections caused by resistant gram-negative bacilli, particularly infections via carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales pathogens. The clinical data are still limited, particularly those in Saudi Arabia. The present study is a retrospective cohort study that was carried out at the Armed Forces Hospital in the southern region of Saudi Arabia to compare the clinical and microbiological outcomes for CAZ-AVI-treated patients as monotherapy and as an add-on to standard therapy for carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumonia (CRKP) OXA-48 infections to those treated with standard drugs. The study included CRKP OXA-48-like infected patients who were administered antibiotics for more than seven days from 1 August 2018 to May 2023. Patients' baseline characteristics and demography were extracted from the clinical records, and their clinical/microbiology efficiencies were assessed as per the corresponding definitions. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were conducted to identify the potential independent variable for CAZ-AVI efficiency. A total of 114 patient files were included for the evaluation. Among these patients, 64 used CAZ-AVI combined with standard therapy and were included in the intervention group, and 50 of them used standard therapy and were included in the comparative group. Following analysis, CAZ-AVI's clinical success was 42.2% (p = 0.028), while the intervention versus comparative groups showed decreased 30-day all-cause mortality (50.0% versus 70.0%; p = 0.036) and infection recurrence (7.8% versus 24.0%; p = 0.019), as well as substantially increased rates of microbial eradication (68.8% versus 42.0%; p = 0.007). CAZ-AVI add-on therapy rather than monotherapy showed statistically significant favored clinical and microbial outcomes over the standard therapy. Furthermore, sex (female %), ICU admission, and fever were negatively associated with patients' 30-day all-cause mortality, serving as independent negative factors. Only fever, CRP bio levels, inotropes, and ICU admissions were significant predictors influencing the CAZ-AVI's clinical efficiency. The duration of CAZ-AVI therapy positively influenced CAZ-AVI's microbial eradication, while both WBC counts and fever experiences were negative predictors. This study shows the effective usage of CAZ-AVI against CRKP OXA-48-like infections. The influencing independent variables depicted here should recommend that clinicians individualize the CAZ-AVI dose based on co-existing risk factors to achieve optimal survival and efficacy. Prospective multicenter and randomized control studies are recommended, with individualized CAZ-AVI precision administration implemented based on patients' characteristics.

Bloodstream infections after solid organ transplantation: clinical epidemiology and antimicrobial resistance (2016-21)

Background

Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients are at risk of bloodstream infections (BSIs) with MDR organisms (MDROs).

Objectives

To describe the epidemiology of BSI in the year after several types of SOT, as well as the prevalence of MDRO infections in this population.

Methods

We conducted a single-centre, retrospective study of kidney, liver, heart, and multi-organ transplantation patients. We examined BSIs ≤1 year from SOT and classified MDRO phenotypes for Staphylococcus aureus, enterococci, Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Candida spp. We compared BSI characteristics between SOT types and determined risk factors for 90 day mortality.

Results

We included 2293 patients [1251 (54.6%) kidney, 663 (28.9%) liver, 219 (9.6%) heart and 160 (7.0%) multi-organ transplant]. Overall, 8.5% of patients developed a BSI. BSIs were most common after multi-organ (23.1%) and liver (11.3%) transplantation (P < 0.001). Among 196 patients with BSI, 323 unique isolates were recovered, 147 (45.5%) of which were MDROs. MDROs were most common after liver transplant (53.4%). The most frequent MDROs were VRE (69.8% of enterococci) and ESBL-producing and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (29.2% and 27.2% of Enterobacterales, respectively). Mortality after BSI was 9.7%; VRE was independently associated with mortality (adjusted OR 6.0, 95% CI 1.7-21.3).

Conclusions

BSI incidence after SOT was 8.5%, with a high proportion of MDROs (45.5%), especially after liver transplantation. These data, in conjunction with local antimicrobial resistance patterns and prescribing practices, may help guide empirical antimicrobial selection and stewardship practices after SOT.

Ceftazidime-avibactam versus polymyxins in treating patients with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) pose a significant threat to human health and have emerged as a major public health concern. We aimed to compare the efficacy and the safety of ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) and polymyxin in the treatment of CRE infections.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed by searching the databases of EMBASE, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library. Published studies on the use of CAZ-AVI and polymyxin in the treatment of CRE infections were collected from the inception of the database until March 2023. Two investigators independently screened the literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, evaluated the methodological quality of the included studies and extracted the data. The meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software.

RESULTS

Ten articles with 833 patients were included (CAZ-AVI 325 patients vs Polymyxin 508 patients). Compared with the patients who received polymyxin-based therapy, the patients who received CAZ-AVI therapy had significantly lower 30-days mortality (RR = 0.49; 95% CI 0.01-2.34; I2 = 22%; P < 0.00001), higher clinical cure rate (RR = 2.70; 95% CI 1.67-4.38; I2 = 40%; P < 0.00001), and higher microbial clearance rate (RR = 2.70; 95% CI 2.09-3.49; I2 = 0%; P < 0.00001). However, there was no statistically difference in the incidence of acute kidney injury between patients who received CAZ-AVI and polymyxin therapy (RR = 1.38; 95% CI 0.69-2.77; I2 = 22%; P = 0.36). In addition, among patients with CRE bloodstream infection, those who received CAZ-AVI therapy had significantly lower mortality than those who received polymyxin therapy (RR = 0.44; 95% CI 0.27-0.69, I2 = 26%, P < 0.00004).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to polymyxin, CAZ-AVI demonstrated superior clinical efficacy in the treatment of CRE infections, suggesting that CAZ-AVI may be a superior option for CRE infections.

Ceftazidime-avibactam induced renal disorders: past and present

With the increasing prevalence of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacterial pathogens worldwide, antimicrobial resistance has become a significant public health concern. Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) exhibited excellent in vitro activity against many carbapenemase-producing pathogens, and was widely used for the treatment of various complicated infections. CAZ-AVI is well tolerated across all dosing regimens, and its associated acute kidney injury (AKI) in phase II/III clinical trials is rare. However, recent real-world studies have demonstrated that CAZ-AVI associated AKI was more frequent in real-world than in phase II and III clinical trials, particularly in patients receiving concomitant nephrotoxic agents, with critically ill patients being at a higher risk. Herein, we reviewed the safety data related to renal impairment of CAZ-AVI, and discussed its pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets and dosage adjustment in patients with impaired renal function. This review aimed to emphasize the importance for healthcare professionals to be aware of this adverse event of CAZ-AVI and provide practical insights into the dosage optimization in critically ill patients with renal dysfunction.

Reviewing novel treatment options for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales

INTRODUCTION

Carbapenem resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) are a major threat to global health and hospital-onset CRE infections have risen during the COVID-19 pandemic. Novel antimicrobials are now available for the treatment of CRE infections. There remains an urgent need for new antimicrobials for CRE, especially for those producing metallo-β-lactamases.

AREAS COVERED

This article discusses previously published research supporting currently available novel antimicrobials for the treatment of CRE infections. Newer compounds currently being evaluated in clinical trials are covered. A literature search was conducted in PubMed over all available dates for relevant published papers and conference abstracts with the search terms, 'CRE,' 'carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales,' 'β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor,' 'KPC,' 'NDM,' 'metallo-β-lactamase,' 'ceftazidime-avibactam,' 'meropenem-vaborbactam,' 'imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam,' 'cefiderocol,' 'eravacycline,' 'plazomicin,' 'taniborbactam,' 'zidebactam,' and 'nacubactam.'

EXPERT OPINION

Novel antimicrobials for CRE infections have been developed, most notably the β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, though treatment options for infections with metallo-β-lactamase producing Enterobacterales remain few and have limitations. Development of antibiotics with activity against metallo-β-lactamase producing Enterobacterales is eagerly awaited, and there are promising new compounds in clinical trials. Finally, more clinical research is needed to optimize and individualize treatment approaches, which will help guide antimicrobial stewardship initiatives aimed at reducing the spread of CRE and development of further resistance.

Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Colistin Sulfate in the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Organism Infections in Patients with Hematological Diseases

INTRODUCTION

Carbapenem-resistant organisms (CRO) have emerged as a significant worldwide issue. However, the availability of efficacious antibiotics for treating CRO infections remains limited. Polymyxins, including colistin sulfate, represent the last-line therapeutic option against CRO infections. This study aims to retrospectively evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of colistin sulfate in managing CRO infections among patients with hematological diseases.

METHODS

Between April 2022 and January 2023, a total of 118 hematological patients diagnosed with CRO infection were treated with colistin sulfate at Suzhou Hongci Hospital of Hematology. The assessment encompassed the clinical efficacy, bacterial clearance rate, adverse reactions, and 30-day all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

The study found that the total effective rate of colistin sulfate in the treatment of CRO infection was 74.6%, with a bacterial clearance rate of 72.6%. Throughout the treatment, nephrotoxicity occurred in 7.6% of cases, neurotoxicity in 2.5% of cases, and the 30-day all-cause mortality rate was 22.9%. Multivariate logistic analysis revealed that the treatment course and combination medication with other antimicrobials were independent factors affecting the clinical efficacy of colistin sulfate.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates that the treatment of colistin sulfate can achieve high clinical efficacy and microbial responses, with a low risk of nephrotoxicity. This study provides evidence of the positive clinical efficacy and safety of colistin sulfate treatment in these patients. High-quality randomized controlled trials are still needed to further confirm the beneficial role of colistin sulfate.

Risk factors and clinical outcomes of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteraemia in children: a retrospective study

OBJECTIVES

Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) is increasingly being identified in children, but data on the clinical outcomes in this population are limited. This study aimed to characterise the risk factors for 30-day mortality with CRKP bloodstream infection (BSI) in children.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed from January 2018 to December 2021 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University. Patients aged < 18 years and with CRKP BSI were included. Multivariable Cox and logistic regression were performed to determine risk factors for death and the development of septic shock following CRKP infection, respectively.

RESULTS

This study identified 33 neonates aged 0-4 weeks and 37 older children. The 30-day mortality rate was 39.4% in neonates and 43.2% in older children. In the neonatal population, a higher Pitt bacteremia score (HR 1.694; 95% CI 1.313-2.186; P < 0.001) was an independent risk factor for 30-day mortality. In the non-neonatal population, higher platelet count (HR 0.990; 95% CI 0.982-0.998; P = 0.010), the use of carbapenems (HR 0.212; 95% CI 0.064-0.702; P = 0.011) and appropriately targeted antimicrobial treatment (HR 0.327; 95% CI 0.111-0.969; P = 0.044) were associated with decreased 30-day mortality. Monocyte count < 0.1 × 109 cells/L (OR 3.615; 95% CI 1.165-11.444; P = 0.026) and a higher Pitt bacteremia score (OR 1.330; 95% CI 1.048-1.688; P = 0.019) were identified as risk factors for the development of septic shock.

CONCLUSIONS

Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae BSI was associated with high mortality in children. Appropriate antimicrobial treatment is important to improve survival, but more work is needed to assess the efficacy of specific treatment regimens in children.

The place of new antibiotics for Gram-negative bacterial infections in intensive care: report of a consensus conference

INTRODUCTION

New beta-lactams, associated or not with beta-lactamase inhibitors (NBs/BIs), can respond to the spread of carbapenemase-producing enterobacteriales and nonfermenting carbapenem-resistant bacteria. The risk of emergence of resistance to these NBs/BIs makes guidelines necessary. The SRLF organized a consensus conference in December 2022.

METHODS

An ad hoc committee without any conflict of interest (CoI) with the subject identified the molecules (ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam, meropenem-vaborbactam and cefiderocol); defined 6 generic questions; drew up a list of subquestions according to the population, intervention, comparison and outcomes (PICO) model; and reviewed the literature using predefined keywords. The quality of the data was assessed using the GRADE methodology. Seven experts in the field proposed their own answers to the questions in a public session and answered questions from the jury (a panel of 10 critical-care physicians without any CoI) and the public. The jury then met alone for 48 h to write its recommendations. Due to the frequent lack of powerful studies that have used clinically important criteria of judgment, the recommendations were formulated as expert opinions as often as necessary.

RESULTS

The jury provided 17 statements answering 6 questions: (1) Is there a place in the ICU for the probabilistic use of new NBs/IBs active against Gram-negative bacteria? (2) In the context of documented infections with sensitivity to several of these molecules, are there pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, ecological or medico-economic elements for prioritization? (3) What are the possible combinations with these molecules and in what context? (4) Should we integrate these new molecules into a carbapenem-sparing strategy? (5) What pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data are available to optimize their mode of administration in critically ill patients? (6) What are the dosage adaptations in cases of renal insufficiency, hepatocellular insufficiency or obesity?

CONCLUSION

These recommendations should optimize the use of NBs/BIs in ICU patients.

Efficacy and safety of ceftazidime-avibactam versus polymyxins in the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae is increasingly recognised as a significant public health concern. Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) and polymyxins are considered as the last therapeutic options worldwide. This is the first meta-analysis of recently published data to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of CAZ-AVI with polymyxins in the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched, for publications in any language, from database inception to February 2023.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES

Studies comparing the clinical efficacy and safety of CAZ-AVI with polymyxins were included. Mortality, clinical success, microbiological eradication and nephrotoxicity were assessed as the main outcomes.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Literature screening, data extraction and the quality evaluation of studies were conducted by two researchers independently, with disagreements resolved by another researcher. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess the bias risk for the included studies. Review Manager V.5.3 was employed for the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis included seven retrospective and four prospective cohort studies with 1111 patients enrolled. The CAZ-AVI groups demonstrated a lower 30-day mortality (risk ratio (RR)=0.48, 95% CI of 0.37 to 0.63, I²=10%, p<0.0001) in nine studies with 766 patients; higher clinical success (RR=1.71, 95% CI 1.33 to 2.20, I²=35%, p<0.0001) in four studies with 463 patients; and lower nephrotoxicity in seven studies with 696 patients (RR=0.42, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.77, I²=35%, p<0.05). However, no significant difference in microbiological eradication rates was observed in 249 patients from two studies (RR=1.16, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.39, I²=0, p>0.05).

CONCLUSION

Available evidence suggested that CAZ-AVI treatment held a dominant position with respect to efficacy and safety compared with polymyxins in carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections. However, the analysis included only observational studies, and high-quality, large-scale, multicentre, double-blind randomised controlled trials are needed to confirm the advantage of CAZ-AVI.

Efficacy and mortality of ceftazidime/avibactam-based regimens in carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria infections: A retrospective multicenter observational study

OBJECTIVES

Limited data on clinical and microbiological efficacy, patient mortality, and other associated factors are available for ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ/AVI)-based regimens for carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB). This study aimed to assess these issues retrospectively using multicenter data.

METHODS

This multicenter study included CR-GNB infected patients treated with CAZ/AVI-based regimens for more than three days. Patient characteristics, bacterial culture reports, drug-sensitivity test results, and antibiotic use, including CAZ/AVI use, were extracted from the patient's clinical records. The clinical and microbiological efficacy of the combined drug regimen and patient mortality were evaluated according to corresponding definitions. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were performed to explore the efficacy and mortality-related factors.

RESULTS

A total of 183 patients with CR-GNB infection were considered for the analysis according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. After the treatment of CAZ/AVI-based regimens, the clinical efficacy was 75.4 %. The 7-day microbial efficacy and clearance rate after treatment were 43.7 % and 66.0 %, respectively. Moreover, 30-day all-cause and in-hospital mortality were 11.5 % and 14.2 %, respectively. Harboring renal dysfunction (creatinine clearance rate (CCR) of<20 mL/min), cardiovascular diseases, and digestive system diseases were independent risk factors for poor clinical efficacy of CAZ/AVI-based regimens. Bloodstream infection (BSI), patients with the adjusted doses of CAZ/AVI, and CAZ/AVI co-administration with carbapenem were independently associated factors of bacterial clearance by CAZ/AVI-based regimens. Age, total hospital stays, use of mechanical ventilation, and cumulative CAZ/AVI dose were independent factors associated with all-cause mortality.

CONCLUSION

CAZ/AVI was an effective drug in treating CR-GNB infection. CAZ/AVI that is mostly excreted by the kidney and is accumulated in renal impairment should be renally adjusted. Renal dysfunction and the adjusted dose of CAZ/AVI were associated with efficacy. Clinicians should individualize CAZ/AVI regimen and dose by the level of renal function to achieve optimal efficacy and survival. The efficacy of CAZ/AVI in the treatment of CR-GNB infection, as well as the implementation of individualized precision drug administration of CAZ/AVI according to patients' different infection sites, renal function, bacterial types, bacterial resistance mechanisms, blood concentration monitoring and other conditions need to be further studied in multicenter.

Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling for Ceftazidime-Avibactam Renal Dose Adjustments in Pediatric Patients 3 months and Older

Ceftazidime-avibactam is a novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination developed to treat serious Gram-negative bacterial infections; approved indications include complicated urinary tract infection, complicated intra-abdominal infection, and hospital-acquired pneumonia including ventilator-associated pneumonia in patients ≥ 3 months old. Because of the predominantly renal clearance of ceftazidime and avibactam, dose adjustments (reductions) are required for patients with estimated creatinine clearance (CrCL) ≤ 50 mL/min. We describe the application of combined adult and pediatric population pharmacokinetic models in developing ceftazidime-avibactam dose recommendations for pediatric patients ≥ 2 to < 18 years old with body surface area-normalized CrCL ≤ 50 mL/min/1.73 m² , including moderate, severe, or very severe renal impairment, or end-stage renal disease requiring hemodialysis, and for patients ≥ 3 months to < 2 years old with mild, moderate, or severe renal impairment. Models included allometric scaling for all subjects and simulations (1,000 subjects per age group, renal function group, and indication) were performed nonparametrically using post hoc random effects. Doses were selected based on simulated pediatric patients achieving steady-state exposures similar to adults and high probability of target attainment (using a simultaneous joint target for both ceftazidime and avibactam). Because there were few children with renal impairment in the ceftazidime-avibactam clinical trials, selected pediatric doses were guided by extrapolation and matching of adult exposures associated with efficacy and within established safety margins. The recommended doses for pediatric patients with estimated CrCL ≤ 50 mL/min/1.73 m² use equivalent adjustments in dose quantity and/or administration interval (vs. the corresponding age group with normal renal function) as those for adults.

Use of Ceftazidime-Avibactam in the Treatment of Clinical Syndromes With Limited Treatment Options: A Retrospective Study

Background With rising trends of multi-drug organism infections and the limited availability of new antimicrobials, management of such cases has become a hassle for the clinician. Ceftazidime-Avibactam (CEF-AVI) is evolving as an effective alternative to polymyxins in the management of Carbapenem-Resistant Organisms (CRO) infections. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved CEF-AVI in a restricted group of clinical syndromes where the drug could have potential use. Objective The goal of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome in terms of 14-day all-cause mortality and clinical cure at seven days in patients on CEF-AVI. Methodology A retrospective study was conducted on patients who received CEF-AVI in a period of one year in our hospital. Patients were included in the study if they have received CEF-AVI for more than one day of therapy (DOT) and samples from relevant sites have been sent for culture and sensitivity. Variables and outcomes were collected from the hospital information system and medical records. Results A total of 78 patients were included, 52 (66.7%) were started empirically on CEF-AVI while 26 (33.3%) were on targeted therapy. Out of the 78 patients, 43 patients had positive cultures among which 32 patients had Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE)/Carbapenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) infection. The most common clinical syndrome in which the drug was used was occult sepsis (27/78; 34.6%) followed by primary bacteremia (20/78; 25.6%) and neutropenic sepsis (11/78; 14.1%). The clinical efficacy which was primarily assessed in terms of clinical cure was met for 55 (70.5%) patients. The 14-day mortality for the studies group was found to be 18 (23%). Conclusion The analysis of results shows encouraging clinical cure rates and 14-day mortality rates in a subset of severe infections which has limited treatment options.