The Combination of Daptomycin with Fosfomycin is More Effective than Daptomycin Alone in Reducing Mortality of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcal Bloodstream Infections: A Retrospective, Comparative Cohort Study

Clinical characteristics, therapy and outcome of bloodstream infections caused by vancomycin-resistant enterococci: a multicentre clinical experience

OBJECTIVES

Bloodstream infections (BSIs) due to vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus spp. (VRE) are considered a predictor of mortality among frail patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk factors associated with 30 day mortality and relapse of infection in enterococcal BSI caused by VRE and to evaluate the impact of antibiotic regimens in targeted therapy.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of consecutive hospitalized patients in six teaching hospitals from August 2016 to August 2022 in Italy. All adult patients with a documented VRE BSI were included.

RESULTS

We enrolled 517 consecutive hospitalized patients with VRE BSI; of these BSIs 496 (96.5%) were caused by Enterococcus faecium and 26 (5.1%) by Enterococcus faecalis. The most frequently used antibiotics as backbone were linezolid (48.1%) and daptomycin (43.7%). Overall, the 30 day mortality was 32.1%. Upon Cox regression analysis, the risk factor independently associated with 30 day mortality was Charlson comorbidity index >3 points (P < 0.001), whereas a Pitt score <4 points (P = 0.031), surgery for source control of infection (P = 0.016) and time to targeted therapy <24 h (P = 0.006) were associated with survival. After propensity score adjustment, a daptomycin-based regimen (P = 0.003) was associated with 30 day survival.

CONCLUSIONS

VRE BSI is an important cause of mortality in frail/critically ill patients. Our data highlighted the role of daptomycin as backbone agent for the treatment of enterococcal BSI caused by vancomycin-resistant strains.

Real-World Use, Effectiveness, and Safety of Intravenous Fosfomycin: The FORTRESS Study

INTRODUCTION

Intravenous fosfomycin (FOS) is a broad-spectrum antibiotic primarily used in combination therapy to treat severe infections caused by both Gram-positive (GP) and Gram-negative (GN) pathogens, including multi-drug resistant (MDR) bacteria. The aim of this study, the largest to date, was to evaluate the effectiveness, safety, usage patterns, and patient characteristics of FOS in a real-world setting.

METHODS

Interim analysis of an ongoing, prospective, non-interventional, multicentre study in five European countries, involving centres in Germany, Italy, the United Kingdom, Greece, and Austria.

RESULTS

A total of 716 patients were enrolled between January 2017 and November 2023 (mean age: 62.8 years, APACHE II: 18.3, SOFA: 6.7). Main indications for FOS were bacteraemia/sepsis (23.6%), complicated urinary tract infections (18.0%), and bone and joint infections (17.4%). Other indications included hospital-acquired/ventilator-associated pneumonia (11.0%), complicated skin and soft tissue infections (9.1%), bacterial meningitis/central nervous system (CNS) infections (7.8%), and infective endocarditis (6.4%). Most common pathogens identified were Staphylococcus aureus (31.4%, including methicillin-resistant S. aureus), Klebsiella spp. (including K. pneumoniae) (17.2%), Escherichia coli (14.2%), coagulase-negative staphylococci (12.9%), other Enterobacterales (10.9%), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (8.4%). In 34.6% of patients, an MDR pathogen was involved. Carbapenem resistance (CR) was high in Klebsiella spp. infections (59/123, 48.0%). In most patients, FOS was used in combination therapy (90.2%). The median dose was 15 g/day. Overall, clinical success and clinical response were favourable with 75.3% and 83.4% at the end of FOS treatment. Clinical success rates in infections caused by MDR or CR pathogens were 78.0% and 81.8%, respectively. Microbiological cure was achieved in 82.4% of all patients. Electrolyte imbalances were the most frequently observed adverse drug reactions, while gastrointestinal disorders were rare.

CONCLUSION

The results from this study suggest that FOS is a safe and effective option as combination partner in the treatment of patients with severe infections caused by both GP and GN pathogens, including deep-seated infections and/or involvement of MDR bacteria.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02979951.

Treatment of Complicated Gram-Positive Bacteremia and Infective Endocarditis

The Gram-positive cocci Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus spp., and Enterococcus spp. are the most frequent causative organisms of bloodstream infections and infective endocarditis. "Complicated bacteremia" is a term used in S. aureus bloodstream infections and originally implied the presence of metastatic infectious foci (i.e. complications of S. aureus bacteremia). These complications demand longer antimicrobial treatment durations and, frequently, interventional source control. Several risk factors for the incidence of bacteremia complications have been identified and are often used for the definition of complicated bacteremia. Here, we discuss management and diagnostic approaches and treatment options for patients with complicated bacteremia, with particular focus on infective endocarditis. We also summarize the available evidence regarding imaging modalities and the choice of antimicrobial mono- or combination therapy according to resistance patterns for these pathogens as well as treatment durations and optimized application routes. Finally, we synopsize current and future areas of research in complicated bacteremia and infective endocarditis.

Machine learning in causal inference for epidemiology

In causal inference, parametric models are usually employed to address causal questions estimating the effect of interest. However, parametric models rely on the correct model specification assumption that, if not met, leads to biased effect estimates. Correct model specification is challenging, especially in high-dimensional settings. Incorporating Machine Learning (ML) into causal analyses may reduce the bias arising from model misspecification, since ML methods do not require the specification of a functional form of the relationship between variables. However, when ML predictions are directly plugged in a predefined formula of the effect of interest, there is the risk of introducing a "plug-in bias" in the effect measure. To overcome this problem and to achieve useful asymptotic properties, new estimators that combine the predictive potential of ML and the ability of traditional statistical methods to make inference about population parameters have been proposed. For epidemiologists interested in taking advantage of ML for causal inference investigations, we provide an overview of three estimators that represent the current state-of-art, namely Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation (TMLE), Augmented Inverse Probability Weighting (AIPW) and Double/Debiased Machine Learning (DML).

Antibiotics with antibiofilm activity - rifampicin and beyond

The management of prosthetic joint infections is a complex and multilayered process that is additionally complicated by the formation of bacterial biofilm. Foreign material provides the ideal grounds for the development of an intricate matrix that hinders treatment and creates a difficult environment for antibiotics to act. Surgical intervention is often warranted but requires appropriate adjunctive therapy. Despite available guidelines, several aspects of antibiotic therapy with antibiofilm activity lack clear definition. Given the escalating challenges posed by antimicrobial resistance, extended treatment durations, and tolerance issues, it is essential to ensure that antimicrobials with antibiofilm activity are both potent and diverse. Evidence of biofilm-active drugs is highlighted, and alternatives to classical regimens are further discussed.

Pharmacotherapies for multidrug-resistant gram-positive infections: current options and beyond

INTRODUCTION

Infections due to multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO) are a serious concern for public health with high morbidity and mortality. Though many antibiotics have been introduced to manage these infections, there are remaining concerns regarding the optimal management of Gram-positive MDROs.

AREAS COVERED

A literature search on the PubMed/Medline database was conducted. We applied no language and time limits for the search strategy. In this narrative review, we discuss the current options for managing Gram-positive MDROs as well as non-traditional antibacterial agents in development.

EXPERT OPINION

Despite their introduction more than 70 years ago, glycopeptides are still the cornerstone in treating Gram-positive infections: all registrative studies of new antibiotics have glycopeptides as control; these studies are designed as not inferior studies, therefore it is almost impossible to give recommendations other than the use of glycopeptides in the treatment of Gram-positive infections. The best evidence on treatments different from glycopeptides comes from post-hoc analysis and meta-analysis. Non-traditional antibacterial agents are being studied to aid in short and effective antibiotic therapies. The use of non-traditional antibacterial agents is not restricted to replacing traditional antibacterial agents with alternative therapies; instead, they should be used in combination with antibiotic therapies.

State-of-the-Art Review: Persistent Enterococcal Bacteremia

Persistent enterococcal bacteremia is a commonly encountered and morbid syndrome without a strong evidence base for optimal management practices. Here we highlight reports on the epidemiology of enterococcal bacteremia to better describe and define persistent enterococcal bacteremia, discuss factors specific to Enterococcus species that may contribute to persistent infections, and describe a measured approach to diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for patients with these frequently complicated infections. The diagnosis of persistent enterococcal bacteremia is typically clinically evident in the setting of repeatedly positive blood culture results; instead, the challenge is to determine in an accurate, cost-effective, and minimally invasive manner whether any underlying nidus of infection (eg, endocarditis or undrained abscess) is present and contributing to the persistent bacteremia. Clinical outcomes for patients with persistent enterococcal bacteremia remain suboptimal. Beyond addressing host immune status if relevant and pursuing source control for all patients, management decisions primarily involve the selection of the proper antimicrobial agent(s). Options for antimicrobial therapy are often limited in the setting of intrinsic and acquired antimicrobial resistance among enterococcal clinical isolates. The synergistic benefit of combination antimicrobial therapy has been demonstrated for enterococcal endocarditis, but it is not clear at present whether a similar approach will provide any clinical benefit to some or all patients with persistent enterococcal bacteremia.

New Antimicrobials and New Therapy Strategies for Endocarditis: Weapons That Should Be Defended

The overall low-quality evidence concerning the clinical benefits of different antibiotic regimens for the treatment of infective endocarditis (IE), which has made it difficult to strongly support or reject any regimen of antibiotic therapy, has led to a discrepancy between the available guidelines and clinical practice. In this complex scenario, very recently published guidelines have attempted to fill this gap. Indeed, in recent years several antimicrobials have entered the market, including ceftobiprole, ceftaroline, and the long-acting lipoglycopeptides dalbavancin and oritavancin. Despite being approved for different indications, real-world data on their use for the treatment of IE, alone or in combination, has accumulated over time. Furthermore, an old antibiotic, fosfomycin, has gained renewed interest for the treatment of complicated infections such as IE. In this narrative review, we focused on new antimicrobials and therapeutic strategies that we believe may provide important contributions to the advancement of Gram-positive IE treatment, providing a summary of the current in vitro, in vivo, and clinical evidence supporting their use in clinical practice.