Role of tcaA, a potential target as a ceftobiprole resistance breaker, in MRSA β-lactam resistance

OBJECTIVES

Using a random forest algorithm, we previously found that teicoplanin-associated gene A (tcaA) might play a role in resistance of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) to β-lactams, which we have investigated further here.

METHODS

Representative MRSA strains of prevalent clones were selected to identify the role of tcaA in the MRSA response to β-lactams. tcaA genes were deleted by homologous recombination in the selected MRSA strains, and antibiotic susceptibility tests were applied to evaluate the effect of tcaA on the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of glycopeptides and β-lactams. Scanning electron microscopy, RNA sequencing, and quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction were performed to explore the mechanism of tcaA in MRSA resistance to β-lactams.

RESULTS

The MIC of penicillin plus clavulanate decreased from 3 mg/L to 0.064 mg/L and that of oxacillin decreased from 16 to 0.5 mg/L when tcaA was knocked out in the LAC strain. Compared with wild-type MRSA isolates, when tcaA was deleted, all selected strains were more susceptible to β-lactams. Susceptibility to ceftobiprole was restored in the ceftobiprole-resistant strain when tcaA was deleted. tcaA knockout caused "log-like" abnormal division of MRSA, and tcaA deficiency mediated low expression of mecA, ponA, and murA2.

CONCLUSIONS

Machine learning is a reliable tool for identifying drug resistance-related genes. tcaA may be involved in S. aureus cell division and may affect mecA, ponA, and murA2 expression. Furthermore, tcaA is a potential resistance breaker target for β-lactams, including ceftobiprole, in MRSA.

Real-World Experience of Ceftobiprole for Community- and Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia from a Stewardship Perspective

Ceftobiprole is a fifth-generation cephalosporin approved by European and American regulatory agencies for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP). Ceftobiprole administration is useful in severe CAP as well as HAP where the potential is to save other β-lactams including carbapenems or linezolid/vancomycin in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to report the real-world evidence of ceftobiprole in patients with CAP and HAP in a single center. In this retrospective study, we included 159 patients with CAP or HAP: 105 (66%) had CAP and 54 (34%) had HAP. The median age was 70 years (IQR 60-77), the median Charlson Comorbidity Index was 5 (IQR 3-7.5) and baseline INCREMENT ESBL score was 8 (IQR 6-11). Ceftobiprole was mostly given as a combination treatment (77%) or as a carbapenem-sparing strategy (44%). There were no differences in mortality between shorter and longer duration of treatment (<7 days compared with ≥7 days (HR 1.02, C.I. 0.58-1.77, p = 0.93) or between first-line (HR 1.00, C.I. 0.46-2.17, p = 0.989) and second-line therapy. Ceftobiprole use in CAP or HAP in the real world is effective as a first- and second-line treatment as well as a carbapenem-sparing strategy. Further studies are needed to explore the full potential of ceftobiprole, including its real-world use in antimicrobial stewardship programs.

In Vitro Antibacterial Activity of Ceftobiprole and Comparator Compounds against Nation-Wide Bloodstream Isolates and Different Sequence Types of MRSA

Bloodstream infections by bacteria, especially multidrug-resistant bacteria, remain a worldwide public health concern. We evaluated the antibacterial activity of ceftobiprole and comparable drugs against different bloodstream isolates and different sequence types of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in China. We found that MRSA, methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), and methicillin-susceptible coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (MSCNS) displayed ceftobiprole sensitivity rates of >95%, which are similar to the rates for linezolid, daptomycin, and vancomycin. Of the tested MRCNS strains, 90.4% were sensitive to ceftobiprole. The sensitivities of ST59, ST398, and ST22 MRSA to ceftobiprole were higher than that of ST239. Ceftobiprole's MIC50/90 value against Enterococcus faecalis was 0.25/2 mg/L, whereas Enterococcus faecium was completely resistant to this drug. Ceftobiprole exhibited no activity against ESBL-positive Enterobacterales, with resistance rates between 78.6% and 100%. For ESBL-negative Enterobacterales, excluding Klebsiella oxytoca, the sensitivity to ceftobiprole was comparable to that of ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, and cefepime. The MIC50/90 value of ceftobiprole against Pseudomonas aeruginosa was 2/16 mg/L, and for Acinetobacter baumannii, it was 32/>32 mg/L. Thus, ceftobiprole shows excellent antimicrobial activity against ESBL-negative Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (comparable to that of ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, and cefepime); however, it is not effective against ESBL-positive Enterobacterales and Acinetobacter baumannii. These results provide important information to clinicians.

Antibiotic Resistance to Molecules Commonly Prescribed for the Treatment of Antibiotic-Resistant Gram-Positive Pathogens: What Is Relevant for the Clinician?

Antibiotic resistance in Gram-positive pathogens is a relevant concern, particularly in the hospital setting. Several antibiotics are now available to treat these drug-resistant pathogens, such as daptomycin, dalbavancin, linezolid, tedizolid, ceftaroline, ceftobiprole, and fosfomycin. However, antibiotic resistance can also affect these newer molecules. Overall, this is not a frequent phenomenon, but it is a growing concern in some settings and can compromise the effectiveness of these molecules, leaving few therapeutic options. We reviewed the available evidence about the epidemiology of antibiotic resistance to these antibiotics and the main molecular mechanisms of resistance, particularly methicillin-resistant Sthaphylococcus aureus, methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium, and penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. We discussed the interpretation of susceptibility tests when minimum inhibitory concentrations are not available. We focused on the risk of the emergence of resistance during treatment, particularly for daptomycin and fosfomycin, and we discussed the strategies that can be implemented to reduce this phenomenon, which can lead to clinical failure despite appropriate antibiotic treatment. The judicious use of antibiotics, epidemiological surveillance, and infection control measures is essential to preserving the efficacy of these drugs.

Unveiling the Relationship between Ceftobiprole and High-Molecular-Mass (HMM) Penicillin-Binding Proteins (PBPs) in Enterococcus faecalis

Low-affinity PBP4, historically linked to penicillin resistance in Enterococcus faecalis, may still have affinity for novel cephalosporins. Ceftobiprole (BPR) is a common therapeutic choice, even with PBP4-related overexpression and amino acid substitution due to mutations. Our study aims to explore the interaction between BPR and High-Molecular-Mass (HMM) low-reactive PBPs in Penicillin-Resistant-Ampicillin-Susceptible/Ceftobiprole Non-Susceptible (PRAS/BPR-NS) E. faecalis clinical isolates. We conducted competition assays examining class A and B HMM PBPs from four PRAS/BPR-NS E. faecalis strains using purified membrane proteins and fluorescent penicillin (Bocillin FL), in treated and untreated conditions. Interaction strength was assessed calculating the 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) values for ceftobiprole, by analyzing fluorescence intensity trends. Due to its low affinity, PBP4 did not display significant acylation among all strains. Moreover, both PBP1a and PBP1b showed a similar insensitivity trend. Conversely, other PBPs showed IC50 values ranging from 1/2-fold to 4-fold MICs. Upon higher BPR concentrations, increased percentages of PBP4 inhibition were observed in all strains. Our results support the hypothesis that PBP4 is necessary but not sufficient for BPR resistance, changing the paradigm for enterococcal cephalosporin resistance. We hypothesize that cooperation between class B PBP4 and at least one bifunctional class A PBP could be required to synthesize peptidoglycan and promote growth.

Safety and effectiveness of fifth generation cephalosporins for the treatment of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections: a narrative review exploring past, present, and future

INTRODUCTION

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bloodstream infection (BSI) is a major issue in healthcare, since it is often associated with endocarditis or deep site foci. Relevant morbidity and mortality associated with MRSA-BSIs forced the development of new antibiotic strategies; in particular, this review will focus the attention on fifth-generation cephalosporins (ceftaroline/ceftobiprole), that are the only ß-lactams active against MRSA.

AREAS COVERED

The review discusses the available randomized controlled trials and real-world observational studies conducted on safety and effectiveness of ceftaroline/ceftobiprole for the treatment of MRSA-BSIs. Finally, a proposal of MRSA-BSI treatment flowchart, based on fifth-generation cephalosporins, is described.

EXPERT OPINION

The use of anti-MRSA cephalosporins is an acceptable choice either in monotherapy or combination therapy for the treatment of MRSA-BSIs due to their relevant effectiveness and safety. Particularly, their use may be advisable in combination therapy in case of severe infections (including endocarditis or persistent bacteriemia) or in monotherapy in subjects at higher risk of drugs-induced toxicity with older regimens. On the contrary, caution should be taken in case of suspected/ascertained central nervous system infections due to inconsistent data regarding penetration of these drugs in cerebrospinal fluid and brain tissues.

New Antimicrobials and New Therapy Strategies for Endocarditis: Weapons That Should Be Defended

The overall low-quality evidence concerning the clinical benefits of different antibiotic regimens for the treatment of infective endocarditis (IE), which has made it difficult to strongly support or reject any regimen of antibiotic therapy, has led to a discrepancy between the available guidelines and clinical practice. In this complex scenario, very recently published guidelines have attempted to fill this gap. Indeed, in recent years several antimicrobials have entered the market, including ceftobiprole, ceftaroline, and the long-acting lipoglycopeptides dalbavancin and oritavancin. Despite being approved for different indications, real-world data on their use for the treatment of IE, alone or in combination, has accumulated over time. Furthermore, an old antibiotic, fosfomycin, has gained renewed interest for the treatment of complicated infections such as IE. In this narrative review, we focused on new antimicrobials and therapeutic strategies that we believe may provide important contributions to the advancement of Gram-positive IE treatment, providing a summary of the current in vitro, in vivo, and clinical evidence supporting their use in clinical practice.

Population Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Analysis for Maximizing the Effectiveness of Ceftobiprole in the Treatment of Severe Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcal Infections

Ceftobiprole is a fifth-generation cephalosporin used for different Gram-positive bacterial infections. A population pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted in real-life clinical patients to assess the adequacy of current dosages. Population pharmacokinetics was conducted using non-linear mixed effect modeling. Monte Carlo simulations were performed to determine the probability of target attainment (PTA) of free trough or steady-state concentration over MIC (fCtrough/MIC or fCss/MIC) ≥ 1 or ≥4 associated with both the standard and intensified dosing regimens adjusted for renal function. Cumulative fraction of response (CFR) against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE) were also calculated. A total of 132 patients with 503 concentrations were included. Most of them (107/132, 81.1%) had hospital- or community-acquired pneumonia, endocarditis, and bacteremia. A three-compartment model adequately fitted ceftobiprole concentration-time data. Estimated glomerular filtration rate significantly affected drug clearance. Monte Carlo simulations showed that the optimal target of fCtrough/MIC or fCss/MIC ≥ 4 is achieved only with the use of the standard dosages administered by continuous infusion (CI) against MRSA infections in patients with preserved renal function. Intensified dosages administered by CI are needed in patients with impaired renal function and/or augmented renal clearance against MRSA and in patients with preserved renal functions against MRSE.

Investigation of the Affinity of Ceftobiprole for Selected Cyclodextrins Using Molecular Dynamics Simulations and HPLC

This paper presents the theoretical calculations of the inclusion complex formation between native ceftobiprole, a promising antibiotic from the cephalosporin group, and selected cyclodextrins (CDs) approved by the European Medicines Agency. Ceftobiprole was studied in three protonation states predicted from pKa calculations, along with three selected CDs in a stoichiometric ratio of 1:1. It was introduced into the CD cavity in two opposite directions, resulting in 18 possible combinations. Docking studies determined the initial structures of the complexes, which then served as starting structures for molecular dynamics simulations. The analysis of the obtained trajectories included the spatial arrangement of ceftobiprole and CD, the hydrogen bonds forming between them, and the Gibbs free energy (ΔG) of the complex formation, which was calculated using the Generalised Born Surface Area (GBSA) equation. Among them, a complex of sulfobutyl ether- (SBE-) β-CD with protonated ceftobiprole turned out to be the most stable (ΔG = -12.62 kcal/mol = -52.80 kJ/mol). Then, experimental studies showed changes in the physiochemical properties of the ceftobiprole in the presence of the CDs, thus confirming the validity of the theoretical results. High-performance liquid chromatography analysis showed that the addition of 10 mM SBE-β-CD to a 1 mg/mL solution of ceftobiprole in 0.1 M of HCl increased the solubility 1.5-fold and decreased the degradation rate constant 2.5-fold.

Hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia (HABP) and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (VABP) in Canada: treatment update and the role of new IV antimicrobials

INTRODUCTION

Hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia (HABP) and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (VABP) continue to be common infections causing significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. The timely initiation of empiric antimicrobial therapy is essential. In this paper, we provide a focused expert opinion on the current and potential empiric antimicrobial treatment options in HABP and VABP in Canada influenced by antimicrobial resistance impacting the use of older agents as well as available new intravenous (IV) antimicrobials.

AREAS COVERED

The authors discuss treatment options for HABP and VABP in Canada. In addition, we focus on the potential role of new IV antimicrobials recently introduced to Canada. A literature search of HABP and VABP treatments was performed via PubMed (up to March 2023), using the following key words: monotherapy, combination therapy, aminoglycosides, carbapenems, cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones, penicillins as well as amoxicillin/clavulanate, ceftobiprole, ceftolozane/tazobactam, dalbavancin, and fosfomycin.

EXPERT OPINION

Empiric antimicrobial treatment for HABP and VABP in Canada continues to focus on both the severity of illness and the presence/absence of patient risk factors for antimicrobial resistance. The role of new IV antimicrobials in the empiric treatment for HABP and VABP depends on their antimicrobial activity and published data on efficacy and safety and influenced by Health Canada-approved indications.

The Impact of Antibiotic Prophylaxis on a Retrospective Cohort of Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19 Treated with a Combination of Steroids and Tocilizumab

OBJECTIVES

In the context of COVID-19, patients with a severe or critical illness may be more susceptible to developing secondary bacterial infections. This study aims to investigate the relationship between the use of prophylactic antibiotic therapy and the occurrence of bacterial or fungal isolates following the administration of tocilizumab in hospitalized COVID-19 patients who had previously received steroids during the first and second waves of the pandemic in Spain.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study included 70 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 who received tocilizumab and steroids between January and December 2020. Data on demographics, comorbidities, laboratory tests, microbiologic results, treatment, and outcomes were collected from electronic health records. The patients were divided into two groups based on the use of antibiotic prophylaxis, and the incidence of bacterial and fungal colonizations/infections was analyzed.

RESULTS

Among the included patients, 45 patients received antibiotic prophylaxis. No significant clinical differences were observed between the patients based on prophylaxis use regarding the number of clinically diagnosed infections, ICU admissions, or mortality rates. However, the patients who received antibiotic prophylaxis showed a higher incidence of colonization by multidrug-resistant bacteria compared to that of the subgroup that did not receive prophylaxis. The most commonly isolated microorganisms were Candida albicans, Enterococcus faecalis, Staphylococcus aureus, and Staphylococcus epidermidis. Conclusions: In this cohort of hospitalized COVID-19 patients treated with tocilizumab and steroids, the use of antibiotic prophylaxis did not reduce the incidence of secondary bacterial infections. However, it was associated with an increased incidence of colonization by multidrug-resistant bacteria.

Cefto Real-Life Study: Real-World Data on the Use of Ceftobiprole in a Multicenter Spanish Cohort

BACKGROUND

Ceftobiprole is a fifth-generation cephalosporin that has been approved in Europe solely for the treatment of community-acquired and nosocomial pneumonia. The objective was to analyze the use of ceftobiprole medocaril (Cefto-M) in Spanish clinical practice in patients with infections in hospital or outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT).

METHODS

This retrospective, observational, multicenter study included patients treated from 1 September 2021 to 31 December 2022.

RESULTS

A total of 249 individuals were enrolled, aged 66.6 ± 15.4 years, of whom 59.4% were male with a Charlson index of four (IQR 2-6), 13.7% had COVID-19, and 4.8% were in an intensive care unit (ICU). The most frequent type of infection was respiratory (55.8%), followed by skin and soft tissue infection (21.7%). Cefto-M was administered to 67.9% of the patients as an empirical treatment, in which was administered as monotherapy for 7 days (5-10) in 53.8% of cases. The infection-related mortality was 11.2%. The highest mortality rates were identified for ventilator-associated pneumonia (40%) and infections due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococus aureus (20.8%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (16.1%). The mortality-related factors were age (OR: 1.1, 95%CI (1.04-1.16)), ICU admission (OR: 42.02, 95%CI (4.49-393.4)), and sepsis/septic shock (OR: 2.94, 95%CI (1.01-8.54)).

CONCLUSIONS

In real life, Cefto-M is a safe antibiotic, comprising only half of prescriptions for respiratory infections, that is mainly administered as rescue therapy in pluripathological patients with severe infectious diseases.

In Vitro Activities of Ceftobiprole, Dalbavancin, Tedizolid and Comparators against Clinical Isolates of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Associated with Skin and Soft Tissue Infections

Skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) are associated with significant morbidity and healthcare costs, especially when caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Vancomycin is a preferred antimicrobial therapy for the management of complicated SSTIs (cSSTIs) caused by MRSA, with linezolid and daptomycin regarded as alternative therapeutic options. Due to the increased rates of antimicrobial resistance in MRSA, several new antibiotics with activity against MRSA have been recently introduced in clinical practice, including ceftobiprole, dalbavancin, and tedizolid. We evaluated the in vitro activities of the aforementioned antibiotics against 124 clinical isolates of MRSA obtained from consecutive patients with SSTIs during the study period (2020-2022). Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for vancomycin, daptomycin, ceftobiprole, dalbavancin, linezolid and tedizolid were evaluated by the MIC Test Strip using Liofilchem strips. We found that when compared to the in vitro activity of vancomycin (MIC₉₀ = 2 μg/mL), dalbavancin possessed the lowest MIC₉₀ (MIC₉₀ = 0.094 μg/mL), followed by tedizolid (MIC₉₀ = 0.38 μg/mL), linezolid, ceftobiprole, and daptomycin (MIC₉₀ = 1 μg/mL). Dalbavancin demonstrated significantly lower MIC₅₀ and MIC₉₀ values compared to vancomycin (0.064 vs. 1 and 0.094 vs. 2, respectively). Tedizolid exhibited an almost threefold greater level of in vitro activity than linezolid, and also had superior in vitro activity compared to ceftobiprole, daptomycin and vancomycin. Multidrug-resistant (MDR) phenotypes were detected among 71.8% of the isolates. In conclusion, ceftobiprole, dalbavancin and tedizolid exhibited potent activity against MRSA and are promising antimicrobials in the management of SSTIs caused by MRSA.

Ampicillin and Ceftobiprole Combination for the Treatment of Enterococcus faecalis Invasive Infections: "The Times They Are A-Changin"

BACKGROUND

Enterococcus faecalis is responsible for a large variety of severe infections. This study is a case series reporting our experience in the treatment of E. faecalis invasive infections with ampicillin in combination with ceftobiprole (ABPR).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed all the medical records of patients admitted to the University Hospital of Udine from January to December 2020 with a diagnosis of infective endocarditis or primary or non-primary complicated or uncomplicated bacteremia caused by E. faecalis.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients were included in the final analysis. The clinical success rate was very high, accounting for 81% of patients, and microbiological cure was obtained in 86% of patients. One relapse was recorded in one patient who did not adhere to the partial oral treatment prescribed. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) was always performed for ampicillin and ceftobiprole, and serum concentrations of both drugs were compared to the MICs of the different enterococcal isolates.

CONCLUSIONS

ABPR is a well-tolerated antimicrobial regimen with anti-E. faecalis activity. TDM can help clinicians optimize medical treatments to achieve the best possible efficacy with fewer side effects. ABPR might be a reasonable option for the treatment of severe invasive infections caused by E. faecalis due to the high level of enterococcal penicillin-binding protein (PBP) saturation.

CEFTO-CURE Study: CEFTObiprole Clinical Use in Real-lifE - a multi-centre experience in Italy

BACKGROUND

Ceftobiprole is approved in Europe for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and non-ventilator associated hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) in adults. Real-life data are limited.

METHODS

This was a multicentre, observational and ambispective investigator-initiated study run in Italy from January 2018 to December 2019 in order evaluate the use of ceftobiprole in a real-life setting.

RESULTS

Overall, 195 patients from 10 centres were evaluated (68% retrospectively). Male sex was prevalent (121, 62%). Median age was 67 years (interquartile range - IQR 53-75). Median value of Charlson score was 5 (3-7). The most frequent indication was pneumonia (151/195, 77%), especially HAP. Other uses were skin and soft tissue infections (5%), endocarditis (4%) and bone infections (4%). Ceftobiprole was usually an empiric choice (65%), in combination with other drugs (66%) and as second-line therapy (58%). A causative agent was found in 39% of cases. A diagnosis of sepsis was made in 59 episodes (30%). Success in the clinical evaluable population (excluding 12 cases owing to isolation of pathogens out of ceftobiprole's spectrum of activity) was obtained in 79% of cases, with an all-cause mortality of 20%. At multilevel analysis, 3 predictors were positively associated with clinical success: male gender, pneumonia, detection of causal agent; sepsis was a negative predictor. Nine factors were independently associated, favourably or unfavourably, with fatal outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Ceftobiprole is a safe and effective therapeutic choice even in a real-world setting. More data are needed to establish its efficacy in septic patients.

Synergistic Combinations of FDA-Approved Drugs with Ceftobiprole against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

New strategies are urgently needed to address the public health threat of antimicrobial resistance. Synergistic agent combinations provide one possible pathway toward addressing this need and are also of fundamental mechanistic interest. Effective methods for comprehensively identifying synergistic agent combinations are required for such efforts. In this study, an FDA-approved drug library was screened against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) (ATCC 43300) in the absence and presence of sub-MIC levels of ceftobiprole, a PBP2a-targeted anti-MRSA β-lactam. This screening identified numerous potential synergistic agent combinations, which were then confirmed and characterized for synergy using checkerboard analyses. The initial group of synergistic agents (sum of the minimum fractional inhibitory concentration ∑FIC_min ≤0.5) were all β-lactamase-resistant β-lactams (cloxacillin, dicloxacillin, flucloxacillin, oxacillin, nafcillin, and cefotaxime). Cloxacillin-the agent with the greatest synergy with ceftobiprole-is also highly synergistic with ceftaroline, another PBP2a-targeted β-lactam. Further follow-up studies revealed a range of ceftobiprole synergies with other β-lactams, including with imipenem, meropenem, piperacillin, tazobactam, and cefoxitin. Interestingly, given that essentially all other ceftobiprole-β-lactam combinations showed synergy, ceftaroline and ceftobiprole showed no synergy. Modest to no synergy (0.5 < ∑FIC_min ≤ 1.0) was observed for several non-β-lactam agents, including vancomycin, daptomycin, balofloxacin, and floxuridine. Mupirocin had antagonistic activity with ceftobiprole. Flucloxacillin appeared particularly promising, with both a low intrinsic MIC and good synergy with ceftobiprole. That so many β-lactam combinations with ceftobiprole show synergy suggests that β-lactam combinations can generally increase β-lactam effectiveness and may also be useful in reducing resistance emergence and spread in MRSA. IMPORTANCE Antimicrobial resistance represents a serious threat to public health. Antibacterial agent combinations provide a potential approach to combating this problem, and synergistic agent combinations-in which each agent enhances the antimicrobial activity of the other-are particularly valuable in this regard. Ceftobiprole is a late-generation β-lactam antibiotic developed for MRSA infections. Resistance has emerged to ceftobiprole, jeopardizing this agent's effectiveness. To identify synergistic agent combinations with ceftobiprole, an FDA-approved drug library was screened for potential synergistic combinations with ceftobiprole. This screening and follow-up studies identified numerous β-lactams with ceftobiprole synergy.

Effect of Antibiotic Exposure on Staphylococcus epidermidis Responsible for Catheter-Related Bacteremia

Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) and especially Staphylococcus epidermidis are responsible for health care infections, notably in the presence of foreign material (e.g., venous or central-line catheters). Catheter-related bacteremia (CRB) increases health care costs and mortality. The aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of 15 days of antibiotic exposure (ceftobiprole, daptomycin, linezolid and vancomycin) at sub-inhibitory concentration on the resistance, fitness and genome evolution of 36 clinical strains of S. epidermidis responsible for CRB. Resistance was evaluated by antibiogram, the ability to adapt metabolism by the Biofilm Ring test^® and the in vivo nematode virulence model. The impact of antibiotic exposure was determined by whole-genome sequencing (WGS) and biofilm formation experiments. We observed that S. epidermidis strains presented a wide variety of virulence potential and biofilm formation. After antibiotic exposure, S. epidermidis strains adapted their fitness with an increase in biofilm formation. Antibiotic exposure also affected genes involved in resistance and was responsible for cross-resistance between vancomycin, daptomycin and ceftobiprole. Our data confirmed that antibiotic exposure modified bacterial pathogenicity and the emergence of resistant bacteria.

Study of Degradation Kinetics and Structural Analysis of Related Substances of Ceftobiprole by HPLC with UV and MS/MS Detection

Ceftobiprole is a novel β-lactam antibiotic, active against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, vancomycin-resistant S. aureus and penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. To artificially generate potential degradation products (DPs) of ceftobiprole that may be formed under relevant storage conditions, acidic, alkaline, oxidative, photolytic and thermolytic stress tests were performed in both solution and solid state. A novel selective HPLC method was developed for the separation of ceftobiprole from its DPs and synthesis by-products (SBPs) using Kinetex Biphenyl column, ammonium acetate buffer pH 5.8 and acetonitrile. The kinetic studies demonstrated the low stability of ceftobiprole in alkaline solution, in the presence of an oxidising agent and under irradiation with near UV. In the solid state, ceftobiprole underwent oxidation when the powder was irradiated with visible light and UV. Based on mass spectroscopic analysis, 13 new structural formulas of SBPs and DPs were proposed, along with molecular formulas for three other DPs obtained in solution and four oxidative DPs characteristic of solid-state degradation.

Susceptibility of Ceftobiprole against Gram-positive and Gram-negative Clinical Isolates from 2019 from different European territories

BACKGROUND

Ceftobiprole is approved for use in treatment of hospital-associated and community-acquired pneumonia in 16 different European countries and is currently undergoing clinical trials in the USA.

METHODS

Isolates were collected from hospital laboratories from 16 European countries during 2019 as part of an ongoing post-marketing surveillance study. MICs were determined using EUCAST broth microdilution methodology and interpreted using 2020 EUCAST breakpoints.

RESULTS

Ceftobiprole was active (MIC, ≤2 mg/L) against 100% and 99.3% of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus and MRSA isolates collected in 2019. Against S. pneumoniae, ceftobiprole was active (MIC, ≤0.5 mg/L) against 98.4% of isolates. Overall, 77.4% of Enterobacterales were susceptible though isolate numbers in certain countries were notably low. In addition, based on non-species related PK/PD breakpoints, 69.7% of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates were susceptible to ceftobiprole. Analysis of data by geographical regions showed that susceptibility to ceftobiprole by region or country was not significantly varied though MRSA, S. pneumoniae, Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa. Isolates from Italy had lower susceptibilities to ceftobiprole: 98% of MRSA, 94% of S. pneumoniae and 61% of Enterobacterales isolates were susceptible to ceftobiprole.

CONCLUSIONS

The data for ceftobiprole for isolates from 2019 are encouragingly very similar to studies performed on isolates from earlier years showing that susceptibility to ceftobiprole has not changed and importantly that resistance emergence remains low throughout Europe.

The antimicrobial activity of ceftobiprole against Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and multi-drug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: A large tertiary care university hospital experience in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Objectives:

To assess the antibacterial activity of ceftobiprole against Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) from various body specimen types and different patterns of resistance.

Methods:

A retrospective cohort study with a total of 49 MRSA and 99 P. aeruginosa isolated in the Microbiology Laboratory at King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, between 2018-2019, were used. Isolates were randomly selected from various specimen types. The minimum inhibition concentration (MIC) of ceftobiprole was determined by E-test. Breakpoints carried out by the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) were used to assess antibiotic susceptibility.

Results:

Approximately 100% of the MRSA isolates were susceptible with MIC50/90 value of 1/1.5 mg/L while 69.8% of multi-drug resistant (MDR) P. aeruginosa isolates were resistant with MIC50/90 value of 16/32 mg/L.

Conclusion:

The excellent activity of ceftobiprole against MRSA would have major implications in management of the patients with serious infections, as an empirical treatment or alternative to vancomycin. Ceftobiprole has a very low activity against MDR P. aeruginosa, and its susceptibility should be tested prior to use for treatment.

Current pharmacotherapy for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) pneumonia

INTRODUCTION

Currently, several antibiotics are active against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and can be used for the treatment of pneumonia. They show great variability in terms of antibiotic class, indication, pharmacodynamic/pharmacokinetic properties, type of available formulations, spectrum of activity against bacteria other than MRSA, and toxicity profile.

AREAS COVERED

In this narrative review, the authors discuss the characteristics of currently available agents for the treatment of MRSA pneumonia.

EXPERT OPINION

The availability of different agents with anti-MRSA activity, and approved for the treatment of pneumonia can allow a personalized approach for any given patient based on the severity of the disease, the setting of occurrence, the patient's baseline risk of toxicity and drug interactions, and the possibility of oral therapy whenever early discharge or outpatient treatment are possible. Although some gray areas still remain, like the lack of high certainty evidence on the efficacy of some old agents and on the precise role of companion agents with toxin inhibitory activity in the case of necrotizing pneumonia, the frequent availability of different treatment choices, each with peculiar characteristics, is already allowing an important step toward a precision medicine approach for the treatment of MRSA pneumonia.

Biofilm Formation in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolated in Cystic Fibrosis Patients Is Strain-Dependent and Differentially Influenced by Antibiotics

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a genetic disease with lung abnormalities making patients particularly predisposed to pulmonary infections. Staphylococcus aureus is the most frequently identified pathogen, and multidrug-resistant strains (MRSA, methicillin-resistant S. aureus) have been associated with more severe lung dysfunction leading to eradication recommendations. Diverse bacterial traits and adaptive skills, including biofilm formation, may, however, make antimicrobial therapy challenging. In this context, we compared the ability of a collection of genotyped MRSA isolates from CF patients to form biofilm with and without antibiotics (ceftaroline, ceftobiprole, linezolid, trimethoprim, and rifampicin). Our study used standardized approaches not previously applied to CF MRSA, the BioFilm Ring test® (BRT®), the Antibiofilmogram®, and the BioFlux™ 200 system which were adapted for use with the artificial sputum medium (ASM) mimicking conditions more relevant to the CF lung. We included 63 strains of 10 multilocus sequence types (STs) isolated from 35 CF patients, 16 of whom had chronic colonization. The BRT® showed that 27% of the strains isolated in 37% of the patients were strong biofilm producers. The Antibiofilmogram® performed on these strains showed that broad-spectrum cephalosporins had the lowest minimum biofilm inhibitory concentrations (bMIC) on a majority of strains. A focus on four chronically colonized patients with inclusion of successively isolated strains showed that ceftaroline, ceftobiprole, and/or linezolid bMICs may remain below the resistance thresholds over time. Studying the dynamics of biofilm formation by strains isolated 3years apart in one of these patients using BioFlux™ 200 showed that inhibition of biofilm formation was observed for up to 36h of exposure to bMIC and ceftaroline and ceftobiprole had a significantly greater effect than linezolid. This study has brought new insights into the behavior of CF MRSA which has been little studied for its ability to form biofilm. Biofilm formation is a common characteristic of prevalent MRSA clones in CF. Early biofilm formation was strain-dependent, even within a sample, and not only observed during chronic colonization. Ceftaroline and ceftobiprole showed a remarkable activity with a long-lasting inhibitory effect on biofilm formation and a conserved activity on certain strains adapted to the CF lung environment after years of colonization.

Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Ceftobiprole in Pediatric Patients

BACKGROUND

Ceftobiprole, the active moiety of the prodrug ceftobiprole medocaril, is an advanced-generation, broad-spectrum, intravenous cephalosporin, which is currently approved for the treatment of adults with hospital-acquired or community-acquired pneumonia.

METHODS

Noncompartmental pharmacokinetics and safety were analyzed from 2 recently completed pediatric studies, a single-dose, phase 1 study in neonates and infants up to 3 months of age (7.5 mg/kg) and a phase 3 study in patients 3 months to 17 years of age with pneumonia (10-20 mg/kg with a maximum of 500 mg per dose every 8 hours for up to 14 days).

RESULTS

Total ceftobiprole plasma concentrations peaked at the end of infusion. Half life (median ranging from 1.9 to 2.9 hours) and overall exposure (median AUC ranging from 66.6 to 173 μg•h/mL) were similar to those in adults (mean ± SD, 3.3 ± 0.3 hours and 102 ± 11.9 μg•h/mL, respectively). Calculated free-ceftobiprole concentrations in the single-dose study remained above a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 4 mg/L (fT > MIC of 4 mg/L) for a mean of 5.29 hours after dosing. In the pneumonia study, mean fT > MIC of 4 mg/L was ≥5.28 hours in all dose groups. Ceftobiprole was well tolerated in both studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Pharmacokinetic parameters of ceftobiprole characterized in the pediatric population were within the range of those observed in adults. In the pneumonia study, the lowest percentage of the dosing interval with fT > MIC of 4 mg/L was 50.8%, which suggests that pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic target attainment can be sufficient in pediatric patients. Ceftobiprole was well tolerated.

Simple and accurate quantitative analysis of cefiderocol and ceftobiprole in human plasma using liquid chromatography-isotope dilution tandem mass spectrometry: interest for their therapeutic drug monitoring and pharmacokinetic studies

OBJECTIVES

Cefiderocol and ceftobiprole are new generation cephalosporin antibiotics that exhibit high inter-individual plasma concentration variability that potentially impact their efficacy or toxicity. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a selective, simple, and fast UPLC-MS/MS method for simultaneous quantification of cefiderocol and ceftobiprole in human plasma to enable their therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) and support PK and PK/PD studies, in particular in critically ill patients.

METHODS

After a simple and fast single-step protein precipitation, cefiderocol and ceftobiprole were separated on a Waters Acquity UPLC BEH C18 column by linear gradient elution; with subsequent detection by Shimadzu MS 8060 triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometer in a positive ionization mode.

RESULTS

Analysis time was 5 min per run. The analytical performance of the method in terms of specificity, sensitivity, linearity, precision, accuracy, matrix effect (ME), extraction recovery (ER), limit of quantification, dilution integrity, and stability of analytes under different conditions met all criteria for a bioanalytical method for the quantification of drugs. The calibration curves were linear over the range of 1-200 mg/L for cefiderocol and 0.5-100 mg/L for ceftobiprole with a linear regression coefficient above 0.995 for both.

CONCLUSIONS

A simple, fast, and selective liquid chroma-tography-tandem mass spectrometry method was developed and validated for the simultaneous quantification of cefiderocol and ceftobiprole. This new method was successfully applied to the measurement of plasma concentration of cefiderocol and ceftobiprole in critically ill patients and showed good performance for their therapeutic monitoring and optimizing antibiotic therapy.

Anti-MRSA Cephalosporin versus Vancomycin-Based Treatment for Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

This systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) compared the clinical efficacy and safety of anti-MRSA cephalosporin and vancomycin-based treatment in treating acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs). PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Turning Research into Practice, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched for relevant articles from inception to 15 June 2020. RCTs comparing the clinical efficacy and safety of anti-MRSA cephalosporin with those of vancomycin-based regimens in treating adult patients with ABSSSIs were included. The primary and secondary outcomes were clinical response at the test-of-cure assessments and risk of adverse events (AEs), respectively. Eight RCTs were enrolled. The clinical response rate was not significantly different between anti-MRSA cephalosporin and vancomycin-based treatments (odds ratio [OR], 1.05; 95% CI, 0.90–1.23; I² = 0%). Except for major cutaneous abscesses in which anti-MRSA cephalosporin-based treatment was associated with a lower clinical response rate than vancomycin-based treatment (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.40–0.97; I² = 0%), other subgroup analyses according to the type of cephalosporin (ceftaroline or ceftobiprole), type of infection, and different pathogens did not show significant differences in clinical response. Anti-MRSA cephalosporin-based treatment was only associated with a higher risk of nausea than vancomycin-based treatment (OR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.07–1.85; I² = 0%). In treating ABSSSIs, the clinical efficacy of anti-MRSA cephalosporin is comparable to that of vancomycin-based treatment, except in major cutaneous abscesses. In addition to nausea, anti-MRSA cephalosporin was as tolerable as vancomycin-based treatment.

A post hoc analysis of two Phase III trials showing the efficacy and tolerability of ceftobiprole in East Asian patients

Aim: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ceftobiprole in patients from East Asia. Materials & methods: A post hoc analysis was conducted of two randomized, double-blind, Phase III studies in patients with community- or hospital-acquired pneumonia. Results: Findings for East Asian patients were consistent with the overall study populations. A trend toward higher microbiological eradication rates and numerically lower rates of all-cause mortality were reported for ceftobiprole versus comparators (all-cause mortality [intent-to-treat]: community-acquired pneumonia, 1.5 vs 2.8%; hospital-acquired pneumonia excluding ventilator-associated pneumonia, 5.9 vs 11.4%). The incidence of adverse events was similar between treatment groups. Conclusion: This post hoc analysis supports the efficacy and tolerability of ceftobiprole in East Asian patients. ClinicalTrials.gov trial identifiers: NCT00326287, NCT00210964, NCT00229008.

Clinical efficacy and safety of ceftobiprole in the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Objectives: To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of ceftobiprole for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs).Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, EBSO, Ovid Medline, ClinicalTrial.gov and Cochrane Library were searched until 25 December 2020. Only randomized controlled trials that compared the treatment efficacy of ceftobiprole with that of other antibiotics for adult patients with ABSSSIs were included in this meta-analysis.Results: The 3 RCTs involving 2291 adult patients with ABSSSIs were included. No significant difference in clinical success, as measured by the TOC, was observed between ceftobiprole and comparators among the intention-to-treat population (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.85-1.33; I² = 0%) and clinical evaluable population (OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.76-1.79; I² = 17%). Ceftobiprole was associated with a similar risk of adverse events (AEs) to that of comparators.Conclusions: Ceftobiprole can achieve similar clinical and microbiological responses as alternative antibiotics in patients with ABSSSIs. In addition, ceftobiprole shares a similar safety profile to comparators.

A Phase 3, Randomized, Investigator-blinded Trial Comparing Ceftobiprole With a Standard-of-care Cephalosporin, With or Without Vancomycin, for the Treatment of Pneumonia in Pediatric Patients

BACKGROUND

The advanced-generation, broad-spectrum, intravenous (IV) cephalosporin, ceftobiprole, is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for adults with hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) or community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), but its effects in pediatric patients have not been established.

METHODS

In this multicenter, investigator-blinded, active-controlled, phase 3 study, patients 3 months to <18 years old with HAP or CAP requiring hospitalization were randomized (2:1) to ceftobiprole versus standard-of-care (SoC) IV cephalosporin treatments (ceftazidime or ceftriaxone), with or without vancomycin. After at least 3 days' IV treatment, patients demonstrating clinical improvement could be switched to an oral antibiotic, to complete a minimum of 7 days' treatment.

RESULTS

Overall, 138 patients were randomized to ceftobiprole (n = 94) or a SoC cephalosporin (n = 44). Median time to oral switch was 6.0 days in the ceftobiprole group and 8.0 days in the SoC cephalosporin group. While on IV therapy, adverse events and treatment-related adverse events were reported by 20.2% and 8.5% of ceftobiprole-treated patients and 18.2% and 0% of SoC cephalosporin-treated patients. Early clinical response rates at day 4 in the intention-to-treat population were 95.7% and 93.2% (between-group difference, 2.6%; 95% confidence interval, -5.5% to 14.7%) in the ceftobiprole and comparator groups, and clinical cure rates at the test-of-cure visit were 90.4% and 97.7% (between-group difference, -7.3%; 95% confidence interval, -15.7% to 3.6%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Ceftobiprole was well tolerated and, in this small phase 3 study, demonstrated similar efficacy to SoC cephalosporins in pediatric patients with HAP or CAP requiring hospitalization.

Efficacy and safety of ceftobiprole in patients aged 65 years or older: a post hoc analysis of three Phase III studies

Aim: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ceftobiprole in patients aged ≥65 years. Materials & methods: We conducted a post hoc analysis of three randomized, double-blind, Phase III studies in patients with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, community-acquired pneumonia and hospital-acquired pneumonia. Results: Findings for patients aged ≥65 years (n = 633) were consistent with those for the overall study populations, although a trend toward improved outcomes was reported in some subgroups, for example, patients aged ≥75 years with community-acquired pneumonia were more likely to achieve an early clinical response with ceftobiprole than comparator (treatment difference 16.3% [95% CI:1.8-30.8]). The safety profile was similar between treatment groups in all studies. Conclusion: This analysis further supports the efficacy and safety of ceftobiprole in older patients with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections or pneumonia. Clinicaltrials.gov trial identifiers: NCT03137173, NCT00326287, NCT00210964, NCT00229008.

Ceftobiprole Perspective: Current and Potential Future Indications

Ceftobiprole combines an excellent spectrum for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) pathogens, with a low/medium MDR risk, and the β-lactams' safety in frail patients admitted to the hospital in internal medicine wards which may be at high risk of adverse events by anti-MRSA coverage as oxazolidinones or glycopeptides. We aimed to report the available evidence regarding ceftobiprole use in pneumonia and invasive bacterial infections, shedding light on ceftobiprole stewardship. The clinical application and real-life experiences of using ceftobiprole for bloodstream infections, including infective endocarditis, are limited but nevertheless promising. In addition, extended-spectrum ceftobiprole activity, including Enterococcus faecalis, Enterobacteriaceae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, has theoretical advantages for use as empirical therapy in bacteremia potentially caused by a broad spectrum of microorganisms, such as catheter-related bacteremia. In the future, the desirable approach to sepsis and severe infections will be administered to patients according to their clinical situation, the intrinsic host characteristics, the susceptibility profile, and local epidemiology, while the "universal antibiotic strategy" will no longer be adequate.

Ceftobiprole Compared With Vancomycin Plus Aztreonam in the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections: Results of a Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Trial (TARGET)

BACKGROUND

The development of novel broad-spectrum antibiotics, with efficacy against both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, has the potential to enhance treatment options for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs). Ceftobiprole is an advanced-generation intravenous cephalosporin with broad in vitro activity against gram-positive (including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus) and gram-negative pathogens.

METHODS

TARGET was a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter, phase 3 noninferiority study that compared ceftobiprole with vancomycin plus aztreonam. The Food and Drug Administration-defined primary efficacy endpoint was early clinical response 48-72 hours after treatment initiation in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population and the European Medicines Agency-defined primary endpoint was investigator-assessed clinical success at the test-of-cure (TOC) visit. Noninferiority was defined as the lower limit of the 95% CI for the difference in success rates (ceftobiprole minus vancomycin/aztreonam) >-10%. Safety was assessed through adverse event and laboratory data collection.

RESULTS

In total, 679 patients were randomized to ceftobiprole (n = 335) or vancomycin/aztreonam (n = 344). Early clinical success rates were 91.3% and 88.1% in the ceftobiprole and vancomycin/aztreonam groups, respectively, and noninferiority was demonstrated (adjusted difference: 3.3%; 95% CI: -1.2, 7.8). Investigator-assessed clinical success at the TOC visit was similar between the 2 groups, and noninferiority was demonstrated for both the ITT (90.1% vs 89.0%) and clinically evaluable (97.9% vs 95.2%) populations. Both treatment groups displayed similar microbiological success and safety profiles.

CONCLUSIONS

TARGET demonstrated that ceftobiprole is noninferior to vancomycin/aztreonam in the treatment of ABSSSIs, in terms of early clinical response and investigator-assessed clinical success at the TOC visit.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

NCT03137173.

Ceftobiprole Activity against Bacteria from Skin and Skin Structure Infections in the United States from 2016 through 2018

Ceftobiprole medocaril is an advanced-generation cephalosporin prodrug that has qualified infectious disease product status granted by the US FDA and is currently being evaluated in phase 3 clinical trials in patients with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs) and in patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. In this study, the activity of ceftobiprole and comparators was evaluated against more than 7,300 clinical isolates collected in the United States from 2016 through 2018 from patients with skin and skin structure infections. The major species/pathogen groups were S. aureus (53%), Enterobacterales (23%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (7%), beta-hemolytic streptococci (6%), Enterococcus spp. (4%), and coagulase-negative staphylococci (2%). Ceftobiprole was highly active against S. aureus (MIC_50/90, 0.5/1 mg/liter; 99.7% susceptible by EUCAST criteria; 42% methicillin-resistant S. aureus [MRSA]). Ceftobiprole also exhibited potent activity against other Gram-positive cocci. The overall susceptibility of Enterobacterales to ceftobiprole was 84.8% (>99.0% susceptible for isolate subsets that exhibited a non-extended-spectrum β-lactamase [ESBL] phenotype). A total of 74.4% of P. aeruginosa, 100% of beta-hemolytic streptococci and coagulase-negative staphylococci, and 99.6% of Enterococcus faecalis isolates were inhibited by ceftobiprole at ≤4 mg/liter. As expected, ceftobiprole was largely inactive against Enterobacterales that contained ESBL genes and Enterococcus faecium Overall, ceftobiprole was highly active against most clinical isolates from the major Gram-positive and Gram-negative skin and skin structure pathogen groups collected at U.S. medical centers participating in the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program during 2016 to 2018. The broad-spectrum activity of ceftobiprole, including potent activity against MRSA, supports its further evaluation for a potential ABSSSI indication.

Ceftobiprole versus daptomycin in Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a novel protocol for a double-blind, Phase III trial

Although Staphylococcus aureus is a common cause of bacteremia, treatment options are limited. The need for new therapies is particularly urgent for methicillin-resistant S. aureus bacteremia (SAB). Ceftobiprole is an advanced-generation, broad-spectrum cephalosporin with activity against both methicillin-susceptible and -resistant S. aureus. This is a Phase III, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter, two-part study to establish the efficacy and safety of ceftobiprole compared with daptomycin in the treatment of SAB, including infective endocarditis. Anticipated enrollment is 390 hospitalized adult patients, aged ≥18 years, with confirmed or suspected complicated SAB. The primary end point is overall success rate. Target completion of the study is in the second half of 2021.

Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03138733

Novel Antibiotics for Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Positive Microorganisms

Increasing multidrug-resistance to Gram-positive pathogens, particularly to staphylococci, enterococci and streptococci, is a major problem, resulting in significant morbidity, mortality and healthcare costs. In recent years, only a small number of novel antibiotics effective against Gram-positive bacteria has been approved. This review will discuss the current evidence for novel branded antibiotics that are highly effective in the treatment of multidrug-resistant infections by Gram-positive pathogens, namely ceftobiprole, ceftaroline, telavancin, oritavancin, dalbavancin, tedizolid, besifloxacin, delafloxacin, ozenoxacin, and omadacycline. The mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, microbiological spectrum, efficacy and safety profile will be concisely presented. As for any emerging antibiotic agent, resistance is likely to develop against these highly effective antibiotics. Only through appropriate dosing, utilization and careful resistance development monitoring will these novel antibiotics continue to treat Gram-positive pathogens in the future.

Ceftobiprole Activity against Gram-Positive and -Negative Pathogens Collected from the United States in 2006 and 2016

Ceftobiprole is an advanced cephalosporin with potent activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria that has been approved in many European and non-European countries to treat community- and hospital-acquired pneumonia (excluding ventilator-associated pneumonia). This study reports on the activity of ceftobiprole against a large set of clinical isolates obtained from hospitalized patients in the United States in 2016 that caused serious infections, including pneumonia, bacteremia, and skin and skin structure infections. To assess any potential temporal changes in ceftobiprole activity, the 2016 results were compared to corresponding MIC data from a 2006 U.S. survey that included key target pathogens. Ceftobiprole exhibited potent activity against Staphylococcus aureus (including methicillin-resistant S. aureus isolates, which were 99.3% susceptible), coagulase-negative staphylococci (100% susceptible), Enterococcus faecalis (100% susceptible), Streptococcus pneumoniae (99.7% susceptible), and other tested streptococci. Similarly, ceftobiprole was highly active against Enterobacteriaceae isolates that did not exhibit an extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) phenotype, including Escherichia coli (99.8% susceptible) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (99.6% susceptible). A total of 99.6% of all Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis isolates were inhibited at ≤1 mg/liter ceftobiprole, and 72.7% of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates were susceptible to ceftobiprole. With the exception of decreased cephalosporin susceptibility among Enterobacteriaceae isolates, which correlates with an increased prevalence of ESBL-producing isolates, ceftobiprole had similar activities against the isolate sets collected in 2006 and 2016. Therefore, ceftobiprole remains highly active when tested in vitro against a large number of current Gram-positive or Gram-negative pathogens that cause serious infections.

Possible clinical indications of ceftobiprole

Ceftobiprole is a fifth-generation cephalosporin approved for the treatment of adult community-acquired pneumonia and non-ventilator associated hospital-acquired pneumonia. However, its microbiological and pharmacokinetic profile is very attractive as armamentarium for empirical monotherapy treatment in other infections too. Among these, the following scenarios could be considered complicated skin and soft tissue infections, moderate-severe diabetic foot infections without bone involvement, vascular-catheter-associated-bloodstream infections, and fever without apparent focus in the hospitalized patient without septic shock or profound immunosuppression.

Ceftobiprole: pharmacokinetics and PK/PD profile

Ceftobiprole shows many similar pharmacokinetic properties to other cephalosporins, except for not being orally bioactive, and that it is administered by IV infusion as the prodrug ceftobiprole medocaril, which is subsequently hydrolyzed in the blood into the active molecule. Distribution focus in extracellular fluid and active antibiotic concentration has been proven in different corporal tissues using dosing regimen of 500 mg intravenous infusion over 2 h every 8 h. Ceftobiprole is eliminated exclusively into the urine, thus the reason why dose adjustment is required for patients with moderate or severe renal impairment, or increased creatinine clearance. However, there is no need for dose adjustments related with other comorbidities and patients' conditions such as age, body weight. Although considering distribution features, molecular weight and dose fraction, increase dosing regimen might be necessary in patients using renal replacement therapy. The half-life of ceftobiprole is more than 3 h, allowing to easily reach optimal PK/PD parameters with the infusion time of 2 h, using the usual dosing regimen.

Safety and tolerability of ceftobiprole

Ceftobiprole is a fifth generation cephalosporin with a series of characteristics differentiating it from other beta-lactams, including its antibacterial activity, mainly against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae and also Gram-negative microorganisms such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa. This antibiotic has been subjected to various clinical trials and the results of these have led to its approval in Spain for the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia, excluding that associated with mechanical ventilation, and community-acquired pneumonia. The results of various ceftobiprole clinical studies provide consistent information on efficacy and tolerability. Ceftobiprole as monotherapy has been shown to be non-inferior to comparator antibiotics in different settings. Information is available on its compatibility with other drugs in Y-site administration, important from the point of view of the intravenous treatment of patients who present venous access limitation. On the other hand, and in contrast to other cephalosporins, ceftobiprole presents a low risk of infection due to Clostridium difficile and, in comparison with ceftaroline, neutropenia has not been reported to present any significant issues.

Mechanisms of action and antimicrobial activity of ceftobiprole

Ceftobiprole, a novel last generation parenteral cephalosporin, has an extended spectrum of activity, notably against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), ampicillin-susceptible enterococci, penicillin-resistant pneumococci, Enterobacterales and susceptible Pseudomonas aeruginosa. It exerts an inhibitory action on essential peptidoglycan transpeptidases, interfering with cell wall synthesis. The inhibitory action of ceftobiprole through binding to abnormal PBPs like PBP2a in methicillin-resistant staphylococci and PBP2b and PBP2x in the case of β-lactam-resistant pneumococci, ultimately leads to rapid bacterial cell death. In the case of Enterobacterales, ceftobiprole retains activity against narrow spectrum β-lactamases but is hydrolysed by their extended-spectrum counterparts, overexpressed Amp C, and carbapenemases. It is also affected by certain efflux pumps from P. aeruginosa. For anaerobic bacteria, ceftobiprole is active against Gram-positive Clostridioides difficile and Peptococcus spp. and Gram-negative Fusobacterium nucleatum but not against Bacteroides group or other anaerobic Gram-negatives. In in vitro studies, a low propensity to select for resistant subpopulations has been demonstrated. Currently, ceftobiprole is approved for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia and hospital-acquired pneumonia with the exception of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Ceftobiprole's place in therapy appears to lie mainly in its combined activity against Gram-positive organisms, such as S. aureus and S. pneumoniae alongside that against Gram-negative organisms such as P. aeruginosa.

High Rate of Ceftobiprole Resistance among Clinical Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates from a Hospital in Central Italy

Ceftobiprole is a fifth-generation cephalosporin with activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). One-year surveillance at the Regional Hospital of Ancona (Italy) disclosed a 12% ceftobiprole resistance rate (12/102 isolates; MIC, ≥4 mg/liter). Epidemiological characterization demonstrated that the resistant isolates all belonged to different clones. Penicillin-binding protein (PBP) analysis showed substitutions in all PBPs and a novel insertion in PBP2a. The mecB and mecC genes were not detected. Ceftobiprole susceptibility screening is essential to avoid therapeutic failure and the spread of ceftobiprole-resistant strains.

In vitro activity of ceftaroline and ceftobiprole against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with decreased susceptibility to vancomycin isolated in paediatric patients

Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC, mg/l) of ceftaroline and ceftobiprole were evaluated over 70 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains with vancomycin MIC ≥1 isolated in a paediatric hospital. The proportion of non-wild-type strains (MIC > epidemiological cut off) was 18% for ceftobiprole and 64% for ceftaroline. Only 1.4% of strains was resistant to ceftobiprole, and none to ceftaroline. These results are worrisome, since show the presence of non-negligible proportions of MRSA strains with high MIC values for ceftaroline and ceftobiprole in a setting where both drugs were never used.

In Vitro Activity of Tedizolid, Dalbavancin, and Ceftobiprole Against Clostridium difficile

Background:Clostridium difficile (C. difficile) is a major nosocomial pathogen that colonizes in the human gut. Recently, the U.S. FDA approved three new antimicrobial agents against gram-positive bacteria: Tedizolid, Dalbavancin, and Ceftobiprole. The efficacy of these antibiotics for treatment of C. difficile infection has not been thoroughly examined. The current study aimed to examine the in vitro activity of these antibiotics against C. difficile. In addition, to compare between Dalbavancin and Ceftobiprole to antibiotics from the same class: Vancomycin and Ceftriaxone, respectively. Methods: Eighty-four C. difficile isolates were tested for susceptibility to Tedizolid, Dalbavancin, Ceftobiprole, Vancomycin, and Ceftriaxone by Etest technique in order to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). Results: Upon comparison of the novel antibiotic agents, Dalbavancin demonstrated the lowest MIC values and ceftobiprole the highest at MIC₅₀ (0.016, 0.38, and 1.5 μg/mL, for Dalbavancin, Tedizolid, and Ceftobiprole, respectively) and MIC₉₀ (0.03, 0.78, and 3.17 μg/mL, respectively). Dalbavancin demonstrated significantly lower MIC₅₀ and MIC₉₀ values compared to Vancomycin (0.016 vs. 0.38 and 0.03 vs. 3.5, respectively) (p < 0.001) and ceftobiprole had significantly lower MIC values compare to ceftriaxone (1.5 vs. 32 and 3.17 vs. 28.8, respectively) (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Dalbavancin and Tedizolid may play a role as potential therapeutic agents for treatment of C. difficile infection. Examination of antibiotic effect on the intestinal microbiome and clinical trials are needed for more accurate results.

High-Level Resistance of Staphylococcus aureus to β-Lactam Antibiotics Mediated by Penicillin-Binding Protein 4 (PBP4)

Penicillin-binding protein 4 (PBP4), a nonessential, low-molecular-weight penicillin-binding protein of Staphylococcus aureus, has been implicated in low-level resistance to β-lactam antibiotics, although the mechanism is unknown. Mutations in PBP4 and its promoter were identified in a laboratory-generated mutant strain, CRB, which expresses high-level resistance to β-lactams, including resistance to the new-generation cephalosporins active against methicillin-resistant strains of S. aureus These mutations did not appreciably alter the β-lactam antibiotic binding affinity of purified recombinant mutant PBP4 compared to that of wild-type PBP4. Compared to the susceptible parent strain, COLnex, the CRB strain produces a highly cross-linked cell wall peptidoglycan, indicative of increased transpeptidase activity. The pbp4 promoter mutation of CRB was associated with greatly increased amounts of PBP4 in membranes compared to those in the COLnex parent. Replacement of the native promoter of COLnex with the mutant promoter of CRB resulted in increased amounts of PBP4 in membranes and a highly cross-linked cell wall. PBP4 can be repurposed to provide essential transpeptidase activity in vivo and confer high-level resistance to β-lactam antibiotics, such as ceftobiprole and ceftaroline.

Pharmacokinetic drug evaluation of ceftobiprole for the treatment of MRSA

INTRODUCTION

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), while decreasing in overall incidence, is still a prominent concern world-wide. New agents coming to market in the last 10 years allow practitioners to optimize treatment for MRSA infections. Ceftobiprole is a cephalosporin agent with MRSA activity, currently approved in selected countries for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia and hospital-acquired pneumonia. Areas covered: Relevant literature regarding spectrum of activity, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and clinical trials will be discussed. Expert opinion: Ceftobiprole is an addition to a growing number of antimicrobials with activity against MRSA. Concern for appropriate dosing in critically ill patients remains due to its ineffectiveness for the treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). While ceftobiprole has activity against gram-negative organisms, the allowance for use of an additional agent for gram-negative infections in clinical trials limits recommendations for monotherapy for empirical treatment of HAP. Ceftobiprole's place in therapy will lie in its activity against gram positive organisms, such as Streptococcus spp. and Staphylococcus spp.

Emerging drugs for nosocomial pneumonia

INTRODUCTION

Hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) is one of the leading nosocomial infections worldwide and is associated with an elevated morbidity and mortality and increased hospital costs. Nevertheless, prompt and adequate antimicrobial treatment is mandatory following VAP development, especially in the face of multidrug resistant pathogens.

AREAS COVERED

We searched Pubmed and ClinicalTrials.gov site reports in English language of phase III clinical trials, between 2000-2016 referring to the antibiotic treatment of nosocomial pneumonia. We provide a summary of latest approved drugs for HAP and emerging drugs with potential indication nosocomial pneumonia.

EXPERT OPINION

There are several promising compounds on their way, as tedizolid-a new oxazolidone, iclaprim-a novel drug, related to trimethoprim, plazomicin-a new aminoglycoside and two combinations of ceftazidime/avibactam and ceftolozane/tazobactam against MDR bacteria, especially against MRSA and Gram-negative ESBL bacteria.

Rates of susceptibility of carbapenems, ceftobiprole, and colistin against clinically important bacteria collected from intensive care units in 2007: Results from the Surveillance of Multicenter Antimicrobial Resistance in Taiwan (SMART)

BACKGROUND

Data on susceptibility to ceftobiprole and colistin, and the complete evolutionary trends of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of important carbapenem agents among important pathogens collected in intensive care units (ICUs) in Taiwan are lacking.

METHODS

We surveyed the MIC distribution patterns of ceftobiprole and colistin and susceptibility profiles of some important pathogens collected from patients hospitalized in intensive care units (ICUs) of major teaching hospitals throughout Taiwan in 2007. We also investigated the rates of nonsusceptibility to powerful carbapenems (imipenem, meropenem) among four important species of Enterobacteriaceae (Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterobacter cloacae, and Proteus mirabilis) collected during the same period. MIC breakpoints recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute in 2014 were applied.

RESULTS

Colistin showed excellent in vitro activity (susceptibility rate, 96%) against Acinetobacter baumannii isolates but moderate (73-77% susceptibility rate) activity against isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and E. cloacae. The ceftobiprole MIC₉₀ value was 4 μg/mL for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and 16 μg/mL for P. aeruginosa. The phenotype of methicillin resistance did not markedly increase the MIC value of ceftobiprole among S. aureus isolates. Interestingly, the proportion of isolates that displayed nonsusceptibility to imipenem was significantly higher among P. mirabilis isolates than among isolates of the other three Enterobacteriaceae species, regardless of the production of extended-spectrum β-lactamase.

CONCLUSION

Continuous monitoring of susceptibility profiles of ICU pathogens to important antibiotics is warranted to provide appropriate antimicrobial regimens against infections in the ICU.

Monte Carlo simulation analysis of ceftobiprole, dalbavancin, daptomycin, tigecycline, linezolid and vancomycin pharmacodynamics against intensive care unit-isolated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

The aim of the present study was to compare the potential of ceftobiprole, dalbavancin, daptomycin, tigecycline, linezolid and vancomycin to achieve their requisite pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) targets against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates collected from intensive care unit (ICU) settings. Monte Carlo simulations were carried out to simulate the PK/PD indices of the investigated antimicrobials. The probability of target attainment (PTA) was estimated at minimum inhibitory concentration values ranging from 0.03 to 32 μg/mL to define the PK/PD susceptibility breakpoints. The cumulative fraction of response (CFR) was computed using minimum inhibitory concentration data from the Canadian National Intensive Care Unit study. Analysis of the simulation results suggested the breakpoints of 4 μg/mL for ceftobiprole (500 mg/2 h t.i.d.), 0.25 μg/mL for dalbavancin (1000 mg), 0.12 μg/mL for daptomycin (4 mg/kg q.d. and 6 mg/kg q.d.) and tigecycline (50 mg b.i.d.), and 2 μg/mL for linezolid (600 mg b.i.d.) and vancomycin (1 g b.i.d. and 1.5 g b.i.d.). The estimated CFR were 100, 100, 70.6, 88.8, 96.5, 82.4, 89.4, and 98.3% for ceftobiprole, dalbavancin, daptomycin (4 mg/kg/day), daptomycin (6 mg/kg/day), linezolid, tigecycline, vancomycin (1 g b.i.d.) and vancomycin (1.5 g b.i.d.), respectively. In conclusion, ceftobiprole and dalbavancin have the highest probability of achieving their requisite PK/PD targets against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from ICU settings. The susceptibility predictions suggested a reduction of the vancomycin breakpoint to 1 μg/mL.

A phase 3 randomized double-blind comparison of ceftobiprole medocaril versus ceftazidime plus linezolid for the treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia

BACKGROUND

Ceftobiprole, the active moiety of ceftobiprole medocaril, is a novel broad-spectrum cephalosporin, with bactericidal activity against a wide range of gram-positive bacteria, including Staphylococcus aureus (including methicillin-resistant strains) and penicillin- and ceftriaxone-resistant pneumococci, and gram-negative bacteria, including Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

METHODS

This was a double-blind, randomized, multicenter study of 781 patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP), including 210 with ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Treatment was intravenous ceftobiprole 500 mg every 8 hours, or ceftazidime 2 g every 8 hours plus linezolid 600 mg every 12 hours; primary outcome was clinical cure at the test-of-cure visit.

RESULTS

Overall cure rates for ceftobiprole vs ceftazidime/linezolid were 49.9% vs 52.8% (intent-to-treat [ITT], 95% confidence interval [CI] for the difference, -10.0 to 4.1) and 69.3% vs 71.3% (clinically evaluable [CE], 95% CI, -10.0 to 6.1). Cure rates in HAP (excluding VAP) patients were 59.6% vs 58.8% (ITT, 95% CI, -7.3 to 8.8), and 77.8% vs 76.2% (CE, 95% CI, -6.9 to 10.0). Cure rates in VAP patients were 23.1% vs 36.8% (ITT, 95% CI, -26.0 to -1.5) and 37.7% vs 55.9% (CE, 95% CI, -36.4 to 0). Microbiological eradication rates in HAP (excluding VAP) patients were, respectively, 62.9% vs 67.5% (microbiologically evaluable [ME], 95% CI, -16.7 to 7.6), and in VAP patients 30.4% vs 50.0% (ME, 95% CI, -38.8 to -0.4). Treatment-related adverse events were comparable for ceftobiprole (24.9%) and ceftazidime/linezolid (25.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Ceftobiprole is a safe and effective bactericidal antibiotic for the empiric treatment of HAP (excluding VAP). Further investigations are needed before recommending the use of ceftobiprole in VAP patients. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT00210964, NCT00229008.

Emerging agents to combat complicated and resistant infections: focus on ceftobiprole

Antimicrobial resistance is a global concern. Over the past few years, considerable efforts and resources have been expended to detect, monitor, and understand at the basic level the many different facets of emerging and increasing resistance. Development of new antimicrobial agents has been matched by the development of new mechanisms of resistance by bacteria. Current antibiotics act at a variety of sites within the target bacteria, including the cross-linking enzymes in the cell wall, various ribosomal enzymes, nucleic acid polymerases, and folate synthesis. Ceftobiprole is a novel parenteral cephalosporin with high affinity for most penicillin-binding proteins, including the mecA product penicillin-binding protein 2a, rendering it active against methicillin-resistant staphylococci. Its in vitro activity against staphylococci and multiresistant pneumococci, combined with its Gram-negative spectrum comparable to that of other extended-spectrum cephalosporins, its stability against a wide range of beta-lactamases, and its pharmacokinetic and safety profiles make ceftobiprole an attractive and well tolerated new antimicrobial agent. The US Food and Drug Administration granted ceftobiprole medocaril fast-track status in 2003 for the treatment of complicated skin infections and skin structure infections due to methicillin-resistant staphylococci, and subsequently extended this to treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia, including ventilator-associated pneumonia due to suspected or proven methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.