Changing Paradigms in the Rehabilitation of Inpatients with Brain Tumors

Optimizing post-acute care inpatient rehabilitation for patients with brain metastasis: A systematic review of functional outcomes

PURPOSE

This study aimed to provide insight into optimizing inpatient rehabilitation (IR) for patients with brain metastases (BM) following hospitalization, including exploring functional outcomes and reviewing interdisciplinary considerations.

METHODS

Using PRISMA guidelines, a search of PubMed and Embase was conducted to identify studies demonstrating functional outcomes of IR for patients with brain metastases.

RESULTS

Three studies met inclusion criteria and a total of 59 patients with brain metastasis underwent IR. The median length of IR was 19.2 days (range: 17.95 - 20). Discharge destination after IR is available for 39 patients, including 33 (84.6%) who were discharged home, 1 (2.6%) who was discharged to a long-term care facility, 3 (7.7%) to an acute care ward, and 2 (5.1%) to palliative care. All 3 studies (n=59) used the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) to assess function after IR. The weighted average total FIM percent gain between admission and discharge was 14.9% (range: 9.6% - 27.4%) and the average FIM efficiency was 0.61 (range: 0.45 - 0.94). For the 2 studies (n=46) that reported motor and cognitive FIM, the weighted average motor gain (16.5%) was greater than the cognitive gain (3.6%).

CONCLUSION

Inpatient rehabilitation (IR) may enhance functional status and independence in patients with brain metastases during the interim post-hospitalization period, optimizing functional performance for a smoother transition to subsequent oncologic treatments. Healthcare providers within the multidisciplinary team should optimize the post-acute hospitalization period by considering both functional status and oncologic prognosis in patients with brain metastases to streamline rehabilitation efforts and minimize delays in oncologic care.

The Italian Consensus Conference on the role of rehabilitation for children and adolescents with leukemia, central nervous system tumors, and bone cancer, part 2: general principles for the rehabilitation treatment of motor function impairments

In Italy, 1400 children and 800 adolescents are diagnosed with cancer every year. About 80% of them can be cured but are at high risk of experiencing severe side effects, many of which respond to rehabilitation treatment. Due to the paucity of literature on this topic, the Italian Association of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology organized a Consensus Conference on the role of rehabilitation of motor impairments in children/adolescents affected by leukemia, central nervous system tumors, and bone cancer to state recommendations to improve clinical practice. This paper includes the consensus on the rehabilitation of children and adolescents with these cancers.

Characteristics of Patients Hospitalized to Community Hospitals With Malignant Brain Tumors and Factors Associated With Discharge Destination

Background

Our main objective was to compare the characteristics and hospital outcomes of patients with primary and metastatic brain malignancies and to investigate the associated factors related to hospital outcomes.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective, cross-sectional study of 1628 patients with brain malignancies from 8 community hospitals between 2017 and 2022 who were identified using International Classification of Disease codes. A stepwise logistic regression was used to identify demographics and clinical characteristics associated with in-hospital mortality and home discharge.

Results

The median age was 65 years old, with 72.5% of patients having metastatic brain malignancies. After 7.2 days of hospital stay, 49.2% were discharged home, and 102 patients expired during hospitalization. Increased age, medical coverage by Medicare, hemiplegia or paraplegia, lower initial hemoglobin level, increased length of stay, and the use of electrolyte replacement, antibiotics, laxatives, heparin, and anticonvulsants were associated with a decreased likelihood of discharge to home. No medical insurance, Medicaid insurance coverage, comorbidities of cerebrovascular disorder, the need to stay in the intensive care unit, patient safety indicator events, and the use of antibiotics, oral analgesics, and ipratropium-albuterol were associated with increased odds of in-hospital mortality.

Conclusion

We identified several predictor variables that delineate differences between both mortality risk and home discharge in patients with primary and metastatic brain tumors. Understanding these predictor variables can be helpful in improving the acute and post-acute care of this population.

Neurorehabilitation for Adults with Brain and Spine Tumors

Central nervous system (CNS) malignancies (i.e. brain and spine tumors) and their treatments can result in a multitude of neurologic deficits. Patients with CNS malignancies experience physical, cognitive, and psychosocial sequelae that can impact their mobility and quality of life. Neurorehabilitation can play a critical role in maintaining independence, preventing disability, and optimizing safety with activities of daily living. This review provides an overview of the neurorehabilitation approaches for patients with CNS malignancies, neurologic impairments frequently treated, and rehabilitation interventions in various health care settings. In addition, we will highlight rehabilitative outcomes between patients with nononcologic neurologic conditions compared to brain and spine tumors. Finally, we address medical challenges that may impact rehabilitation care in these medically complex cancer patients.

Neurorehabilitation in brain tumours: evidences and suggestions for spreading of knowledge and research implementation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The last few decades have seen an increase in life expectancy in brain tumour patients; however, many patients report sensory-motor and cognitive disabilities due to the tumour itself, but also to the effect of anticancer treatments (surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy), supportive treatments, as well as individual patient factors. This review outlines the principles on which to base neurorehabilitation treatments, with the aim of stimulating an early rehabilitative management, in order to reduce disability and functional limitation and improve the quality of life of the persons affected by brain tumour.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although not definitive, evidences suggest that an early neurorehabilitative evaluation, performed with a multidisciplinary approach, may identify the different functional impairments that can affect people with brain tumour. Furthermore, identifying and classifying the person's level of functioning is useful for designing achievable recovery goals, through the implementation of tailored multidisciplinary rehabilitation programs. The involvement of different professional figures allows to treat all the components (physical, cognitive, psychological and participation) of the person, and to redesign one's life project, lastly improving the quality of life.

SUMMARY

Overall, the evidences suggest a critical need for the development of this clinical area by spreading the concept of rehabilitation among neuro-oncologists and producing high quality research.

Predictors of functional outcomes in adults with brain tumor undergoing rehabilitation treatment: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

The number of diagnosed brain tumors (BT) has increased in recent years. The results of treatment of patients with surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy are also improving and their survival rate has increased significantly. Symptoms of the disease and side effects of oncological treatment may reduce the functional performance of patients. It is so important to conduct rehabilitation in this group of patients. The aim of this systematic review is to identify predictors of effective rehabilitation in aspects of physical functioning of BT patients. The study was registered with health and social care, welfare, public health, education, crime, justice and international development departments, where there is a health-related interest outcome PROSPERO. We have received registration number is: CRD42021269398.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

To find relevant publications, the algorithm of keywords ("brain tumor") AND (rehabilitation OR "physical activity" OR exercise OR "physical therapy") was used. The search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, PEDro, ClinicalTrials.gov and Cochrane Library. Information was extracted using the PICO format (i.e., participants, intervention, comparison, outcomes).

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

the initial search identified a total of 1122 results, and 21 articles met the criteria and were selected for analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The results present that rehabilitation is an important and safe cancer encouraging therapy, brings functional benefits. The type of rehabilitation program, especially in BT patients, depends on many factors such as time and type of oncological treatment, general conditions which is strongly related to the general functioning of the patient. It still is a need for clinical research into the safety and effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions already during radio or chemotherapy in this group of cancer patients.

Medical Complications and Prognostic Factors for Medically Unstable Conditions During Acute Inpatient Cancer Rehabilitation

PURPOSE

Acute inpatient rehabilitation provides concurrent medical care and intensive rehabilitation. We sought to describe the nature of types of medical complications and to identify the more frequent types of medical complications management in patients with cancer undergoing acute inpatient rehabilitation.

METHODS

We reviewed the records of all consecutive patients admitted to acute inpatient rehabilitation from September 1, 2017, through February 28, 2018. Presenting problem noted to be a significant change in medical status using the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' Evaluation and Management Service Guide was defined as a medical complication. We recorded demographic and clinical characteristics. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to assess prognostic factors for returning to acute care.

RESULTS

Among 165 evaluable patients, 158 (96%) had at least one medical complication, and 31 (19%) had an unplanned return to acute care. After excluding three patients who had planned return to acute care, there was a cohort of 162 patients and the most common medical complication categories were electrolyte abnormalities 81 (50%), musculoskeletal 70 (43%), genitourinary or renal 61 (38%), hematologic 58 (36%), and cardiovascular problems 46 (28%). Multivariable analysis showed that tachycardia (odds ratio [OR], 7.83; 95% CI, 2.23 to 27.54; P = .001) and weekly or more frequent RBC transfusions (OR, 5.23; 95% CI, 1.39 to 19.64; P = .014) were independently associated with unplanned return to acute care.

CONCLUSION

A high frequency and wide range of medical complications and interventions occur in patients with cancer undergoing acute inpatient rehabilitation. Close monitoring and expertise are needed for this patient population.

Impact of inpatient rehabilitation services on the functional levels of cancer patients at King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Objectives:

To identify the impact of inpatient rehabilitation services on the functional levels of cancer patients.

Methods:

This was a retrospective study of data from the Rehabilitation Hospital, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, from 2012 to 2018. The functional independence measure (FIM) tool was used to assess functional changes from admission to discharge to determine the impact of inpatient rehabilitation.

Results:

A total of 81 eligible records were reviewed. The median hospital length of stay (LOS) was 50 days, mean±SD of the FIM gain was 25 (15.3), and 91.4% were discharged home, while only 4.9% were readmitted. Although statistically significant gains were observed in both motor and cognitive scores, motor scores improved more than the cognitive. The LOS was less (30 days) in patients requiring minimal assistance, at the time of admission, compared to the LOS in patients with moderate and low levels of independence. The level of significance was set at p≤0.05

Conclusions:

In patient cancer rehabilitation service demonstrated statistically significant functional gains during rehabilitation at King Fahad Medical City. This study may help the policymakers to provide similar rehabilitation services to all cancer patients as well as in other health care hospitals to improve the functional status of cancer survivors.

Can Multidisciplinary Inpatient and Outpatient Rehabilitation Provide Sufficient Prevention of Disability in Patients with a Brain Tumor?-A Case-Series Report of Two Programs and A Prospective, Observational Clinical Trial

Brain tumor (BT) patients have a high incidence of disability due to the effects of the tumor itself or oncological treatment. Despite the incidence of neurological and functional deficits caused by BT, rehabilitation of those patients is not as properly established as in patients with other neurological conditions. The aim of the research was to evaluate the effectiveness of a multidisciplinary rehabilitation, carried out as an out- or in-patient program, as prevention of disability in BT patients. This was developed as a case-series report of two programs and a prospective, observational clinical study in BT patients who were allocated to inpatient (n = 28) or outpatient (n = 26) rehabilitation programs. The patients were assessed using the Barthel Index, Berg Balance Scale, Functional Independence Measure (FIM), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Brain and Cognitive Function, and Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination III (ACE III) upon admission and after 12 weeks of rehabilitation. Analysis of the results showed that patients in both programs significantly improved their physical functioning scores in daily activities (p < 0.0001). We also observed significant reductions in most post-intervention cognitive complaints (p < 0.05), except for the FIM social functioning and ACE III language functioning in the outpatient group (p > 0.05) in contrast to inpatients (p < 0.001). This is evidence that early multidisciplinary rehabilitation is an effective therapeutic strategy to reduce BT symptoms and disability in this group of patients.