The reference value of trabecular bone score (TBS) in the Iranian population

Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry for Osteoporosis Screening: AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is an established method for osteoporosis screening and treatment monitoring, providing results that predict fracture risk. DXA is used not only to measure bone mineral density (BMD) in various anatomic sites, but also to perform vertebral fracture analysis, trabecular bone score (TBS) determination, and whole-body composition analysis. While DXA is central in osteoporosis screening, the test has limitations, and other factors beyond BMD measurements must be considered when planning treatments and follow-up strategies. For example, sex, race and ethnicity, prior fragility fractures, glucocorticoid use, and prior falls, all affect fracture risk. Despite a growing population of older individuals and growing evidence of variations in fracture risk, osteoporosis screening recommendations have not evolved significantly. Moreover, despite existence of screening recommendations, DXA remains underutilized, and osteoporosis underdiagnosed. This AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review discusses the current status of osteoporosis screening by DXA, addressing current practice recommendations, use of BMD results to guide risk predictions and management decisions, as well as challenges and limitations along with evolving solutions. Topics explored include DXA reporting and screening recommendations; fragility fracture risk assessment tools; role of TBS; race, ethnicity, and sex considerations; application in children; and CT-based BMD measurements and opportunistic screening.

Trabecular bone score norms in Asian-Indians and associations with serum 25(OH)D and parathyroid hormone

OBJECTIVE

There is limited information on population-specific norms of trabecular-bone-score (TBS) and its associated factors. Here, we provide norms of TBS in Asian-Indians and its relationship with serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] and intact-parathyroid hormone (iPTH).

PARTICIPANTS AND MEASUREMENTS

TBS, bone-mineral-density (BMD), and vertebral-fractures (VFs) were assessed using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in 923 healthy Asian-Indians (aged 20-60 years). Serum 25(OH)D, iPTH, T4/TSH,, glycosylated-haemoglobin (HbA1c) were measured and associations with TBS assessed using multivariable linear regression. Subjects with BMD Z-score ≤ -2.0 or ≥2.0 at any sites, VFs, TSH > 10.0 or <0.05 µIU/ml, blood-glucose >11.1 mmol/L or HbA1c > 8.0% were excluded for generating Asian-Indian norms.

RESULTS

TBS norms were generated in 744 healthy Asian-Indians (M:F,389:385). The cut-offs generated for 'normal', 'partially-degraded', and 'degraded' TBS were >1.305, 1.204-1.305 and <1.204, respectively. Mean TBS was lower in females than males (p < .001). There was 75% congruency in TBS categories between Asian-Indian and existing norms. Specificity (97.8 vs. 77.9%, p < .001) and diagnostic-accuracy (97.8% vs. 78.4%, p < .001) of TBS to detect osteoporosis were higher with Asian-Indian norms. The sensitivity of 'partially-degraded' TBS to diagnose osteopenia was also higher with Asian-Indian norms. In multivariable regression, gender, body-mass-index (BMI), BMD-L1-L4, serum PTH, daily dietary-calorie intake and calcium intake were associated with TBS. Though 25(OH)D inversely correlated with PTH, 25(OH)D was not associated with TBS.

CONCLUSION

This study provides norms for TBS in Asian-Indians with gender-specific differences. Increasing age and higher BMI were associated with lower TBS. Associations of TBS with circulating PTH and/or 25(OH)D need confirmation in further studies.

Clinical significance of trabecular bone score of DXA in hip fracture patients-comparative study between trochanteric fractures and neck fractures

BACKGROUND

Studies have shown that the clinical efficacy of TBS (Trabecular Bone Score) of DXA in hip fracture patients. This study aimed to investigate the difference of TBS in trochanteric fractures and femoral neck fractures in hip fracture patients.

METHODS

Data were derived from the University affiliated hospital, the participants included 249 patients aged 60 years or older who were available of TBS prescribe by DXA. 89 femoral neck fracture patients and 160 trochanteric fractures were enrolled. Spine T- score, hip T- score (neck), hip T- score (total), lowest T- score in hip, L1-L4 TBS. TBS Z-score, L1-L4 BMD(g/cm²), L1-L4 BMD T-score, L1 TBS, L1 BMD(g/cm2), L1 BMD T-score, L2 TBS, L2 BMD(g/cm2), L2 BMD T-score, L3 TBS, L3 BMD(g/cm2), L3 BMD T-score, L4 TBS, L4 BMD(g/cm2), L4 BMD T-score, lowest TBS score, highest TBS score were analyzed.

RESULTS

Demographic data (age, sex, height, weight, BMI) and T-score of hip and spine in two groups showed no significant difference. TBS in spine in two groups revealed higher TBS in femoral neck fracture groups.

CONCLUSION

There is no difference of age, sex, and BMI in two groups. The T-score was not statistically significant in comparison of bone quality in hip fracture groups. The TBS in femoral neck fracture group is higher than trochanteric fractures. The TBS in spine can be more valuable than T-score of DXA for the proper evaluation of bone quality in the hip fracture patients.

The association of osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease risk score based on the Framingham and ACC/AHA risk prediction models: a cross-sectional analysis of Bushehr Elderly Health Program

Background

The association between osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease, two major health problems, has been reported in some studies. In this study was aimed to investigate the relationship between osteoporosis and the CVD risk score based on Framingham and American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) prediction models in the population over 60 years old.

Methods

A cross-sectional analysis was conducted on data from 2389 men and women participating in the Bushehr Elderly Health (BEH) program. Osteoporosis was defended as T-score ≤  - 2.5 at any site (total hip, femoral neck and lumbar spine (L1-L4). Based on Framingham and ACC/AHA risk scores, participants were categorized as non-high risk (< 20%) or high-risk (≥ 20%). Logistic regression model, was applied to investigate the relationship between osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease risk scores. All comparisons were stratified by sex.

Results

Considering the cut point of ≥ 20% for CVD risk, 36.7% of women and 66.2% of men were categorized as having high risk of CVD in ACC/AHA model. These values in women and men based on the Framingham model were 30% and 35.7%, respectively. In general, there was a negative significant correlation between BMD in the femoral neck, total hip and TBS except for the spine with the CVD risk score in both models. After adjusting for confounding variables, a significant positive association was observed between osteoporosis only at femoral neck with CVD risk score ≥ 20% based on ACC/AHA in both genders.

Conclusion

The ACC/AHA model is effective in identifying the CVD risk difference between individuals with and without osteoporosis.

Update on the utility of trabecular bone score (TBS) in clinical practice for the management of osteoporosis: a systematic review by the Egyptian Academy of Bone and Muscle Health

Trabecular bone score (TBS) is a grayscale textural assessment resulting from a computed evaluation of pixel gray-level variations in previously obtained lumbar spine DXA images. It is an index of bone microarchitecture correlated with parameters of bone strength. Higher values of TBS indicate a better microarchitecture, whereas lower values indicate a degraded microarchitecture. TBS can be used alongside Fracture Risk Assessment tool “FRAX” and bone mineral density (BMD) to enhance the assessment of fracture risk and to inform treatment initiation and monitoring. A systematic review was carried out aiming to update the evidence on the clinical use of the TBS in the management of both primary and secondary osteoporosis. Results revealed that in both primary and secondary osteoporosis, TBS enhances the prediction of fracture risk, and when adjust with BMD and clinical risk factors, it is able to inform the decision-making process regarding initiating osteoporosis therapy and the choice of anti-osteoporosis medication. Evidence also implies that TBS provides valuable adjunctive information in monitoring osteoporosis therapy. In conclusion, this work provides an up-to-date evidence-based review and recommendations which informs the utility of trabecular bone score in standard clinical practice.

Clinical Use of Trabecular Bone Score: The 2023 ISCD Official Positions

Osteoporosis can currently be diagnosed by applying the WHO classification to bone mineral density (BMD) assessed by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). However, skeletal factors other than BMD contribute to bone strength and fracture risk. Lumbar spine TBS, a grey-level texture measure which is derived from DXA images has been extensively studied, enhances fracture prediction independent of BMD and can be used to adjust fracture probability from FRAX® to improve risk stratification. The purpose of this International Society for Clinical Densitometry task force was to review the existing evidence and develop recommendations to assist clinicians regarding when and how to perform, report and utilize TBS. Our review concluded that TBS is most likely to alter clinical management in patients aged ≥ 40 years who are close to the pharmacologic intervention threshold by FRAX. The TBS value from L1-L4 vertebral levels, without vertebral exclusions, should be used to calculate adjusted FRAX probabilities. L1-L4 vertebral levels can be used in the presence of degenerative changes and lumbar compression fractures. It is recommended not to report TBS if extreme structural or pathological artifacts are present. Monitoring and reporting TBS change is unlikely to be helpful with the current version of the TBS algorithm. The next version of TBS software will include an adjustment based upon directly measured tissue thickness. This is expected to improve performance and address some of the technical factors that affect the current algorithm which may require modifications to these Official Positions as experience is acquired with this new algorithm.

Degenerative lumbar changes have a statistically significant but small effect on trabecular bone score (TBS)-adjusted fracture risk (FRAX)

Trabecular bone score (TBS) assesses trabecular microarchitecture at the lumbar spine and was shown to improve fracture risk prediction compared to bone mineral density (BMD) alone. We investigated whether lumbar degenerative changes (DC) affect TBS and TBS-adjusted 10-year fracture risk assessment (tool) (FRAX) estimates. All patients who underwent BMD and TBS measurements via dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at our institution between 1/7/2020 and 1/10/2020 were retrospectively evaluated. We identified all patients who had DC in 1 or 2 vertebrae (out of L1-L4) with a BMD T score > 1 unit higher than the remaining 2 to 3 adjacent vertebrae. TBS and BMD were compared between the vertebrae with and without DC. Change in TBS as well as FRAX estimates for major osteoporotic (MOP) and hip fractures after exclusion of the degenerative vertebrae were also determined. Of the 356 eligible patients, 94 met the inclusion criteria. The mean TBS of vertebrae without DC was not significantly different from that of L1 to L4 (1.31 ± 0.12 vs 1.32 ± 0.12, respectively, P = .11). The FRAX estimates after exclusion of the degenerative vertebrae were statistically significantly higher than for L1 to L4 for both MOP and hip fractures (P = .04 and P = .01, respectively). However, the differences were very small. The mean 10-year MOP FRAX estimate after exclusion of degenerative vertebrae was 7.67% ± 4.50% versus 7.55% ± 4.36% for L1 to L4 and the mean 10-year hip FRAX estimate after exclusion of degenerative vertebrae was 2.06% ± 2.01% versus 2.02% ± 1.98% for L1 to L4. Lumbar DC have a statistically significant but only small effect on TBS-adjusted FRAX making it unnecessary to exclude the degenerative vertebrae when computing TBS.

Bone density and trabecular bone score to predict fractures in adults aged 20-39 years: a registry-based study

Trabecular bone score (TBS) enhances fracture risk assessment in older adults; whether this is true in younger people is uncertain. In this registry-based study of adults aged 20-39 years, low BMD, but not low TBS, predicted fracture.

PURPOSE

Trabecular bone score (TBS), a bone texture measurement, is associated with fracture risk independent of bone mineral density (BMD) in older adults. In adults aged 20-40 years, TBS remains stable and its role in fracture risk assessment is unclear. We utilized the Manitoba Bone Density Registry to explore the relationship of fracture risk with BMD and TBS in younger adults.

METHODS

Women and men aged 20-39 years referred for DXA testing were studied. Incident major and any fractures were captured from health records. Categories based on WHO BMD T-score classification and TBS tertile were considered using Cox regression models to estimate covariate-adjusted (including sex) hazard ratios (aHR, 95%CI) for incident fracture by category, and each SD decrement in BMD and TBS.

RESULTS

The study included 2799 individuals (77% female, mean age 32 years). Mean (SD) minimum T-score was - 0.9 (1.1) and TBS 1.355 (0.114); 7% had osteoporosis and 13% were in the lowest TBS tertile. Incident major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) and any fracture risk was elevated in those with osteopenia (aHRs 1.20/1.45) and osteoporosis (aHRs 4.60/5.16). Fracture risk was unrelated to TBS tertile. Each SD decrement in BMD was associated with increased MOF risk (aHR 1.64) and any fracture (aHR 1.71); lower TBS was unrelated to fractures.

CONCLUSION

In young adults, low BMD, but not low TBS, was predictive of MOF and any fracture. Routine clinical TBS measurement is not recommended for young adults. Further study is indicated to evaluate whether TBS is beneficial in subsets of younger adults.

Logistic Entropy of Trabecular Bone Score in SLE Patients and New Type Visualizations

The medical images and reference intervals, in the diagnosis and treatment process of diseases, are undoubtedly very important. Clear and easy interpretation of images and reference intervals derived from medical devices and statistical methods, respectively, are of great importance for doctors in the diagnosis and treatment process. In this article, for systemic lupus erythematosus disease, we have transformed the reference intervals into fuzzy sets and calculated the entropy values to find the uncertainty contained in the reference interval of systemic lupus erythematosus disease, so the doctors can keep in view patient treatment using entropy values. Finally, for better observations of patients, with the help of the entropy functions, new types of medical images were given for some trabecular bone diseases using Wolfram Mathematica 7.0. We should note that this type of medical images for bone mineral density is not in medicine.

Usefulness of the Trabecular Bone Score in Assessing the Risk of Vertebral Fractures in Patients with Cirrhosis

The trabecular bone score (TBS), a surrogate measure of bone microarchitecture, provides complementary information to bone mineral density (BMD) in the assessment of osteoporotic fracture risk. This cross-sectional study aimed to determine whether TBS can identify patients with liver cirrhosis that are at risk of vertebral fractures. We enrolled 275 patients who completed evaluations for lumbar BMD, TBS, and vertebral fractures between November 2018 and April 2021. BMD was measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), TBS was calculated by analyzing DXA images using TBS iNsight software, and vertebral fractures were evaluated using Genant’s semi-quantitative method with lateral X-ray images. Factors associated with vertebral fractures and their correlation with the TBS were identified using regression models. Of the enrolled patients, 128 (47%) were female, the mean age was 72 years, and 62 (23%) were diagnosed with vertebral fractures. The prevalence of vertebral fractures was higher in women than in men (33% vs. 14%; p < 0.001). The unadjusted odds ratio (OR) of the vertebral fractures for one standard deviation decrease in TBS and BMD was 2.14 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.69−2.73) and 1.55 (95% CI, 1.26−1.90), respectively. After adjusting for age, sex, and BMD, the adjusted OR of the vertebral fractures in TBS was 2.26 (95% CI, 1.52−3.35). Multivariate linear regression analysis showed that TBS was independently correlated with age (β = −0.211), body mass index (β = −0.251), and BMD (β = 0.583). TBS can help identify patients with cirrhosis at risk of vertebral fractures.

Age-Specific Normative Values of Lumbar Spine Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) in Taiwanese Men and Women

Trabecular bone score (TBS) is a novel method for assessing trabecular microarchitecture. Normative values of TBS are available for various populations of the world but are not yet available for Taiwanese adults. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to estimate age-specific, normative TBS curves for Taiwanese men and women. Medical records of general health examinations from a regional hospital in Southern Taiwan were reviewed. Individuals aged 30–90 years with data on lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) were included. TBS was retrospectively calculated from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans using TBS iNsight software. Of the 12,028 patients included, 4533 (37.7%) were male and the mean age was 55.8 years. The mean TBS was 1.392 (standard deviation (SD) 0.089) for men and 1.344 (SD 0.107) for women. In women, TBS declined at a rate of 0.0004/year among those aged 30.0–45.9 years, 0.0106/year among those 46.0–60.7 years, and 0.0028/year among those 60.8–90.0 years. In men, TBS declined at a constant rate of 0.0023/year over the entire age range. In conclusion, age-adjusted, normative curves of TBS for Taiwanese men and women are presented, which could be used to facilitate the use of TBS in assessing bone status in clinical practice.

Bone characteristics and metabolic phenotypes of obesity in an Iranian Elderly population: Bushehr Elderly Health Program (BEHP)

INTRODUCTION

Obesity and osteoporosis are health problems with high impact on the morbidity and mortality rate. While the association between BMI and bone density is known, the combined effects of obesity and metabolic components on bone health have not yet been revealed. The objectives of this study were to determine the association between bone health and different phenotypes of obesity in an elderly population.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study was conducted on the data collected in the Bushehr Elderly Health Program (BEHP). The participants were classified in four groups based on the metabolic phenotypes of obesity (metabolic healthy obese (MHO), metabolic non-healthy non-obese (MNHNO), metabolic non-healthy obese (MNHO), and metabolic healthy non-obese (MHNO)). The association between osteoporosis and TBS and the metabolic phenotypes of obesity were assessed using multiple variable logistic regression models.

RESULTS

Totally, 2378 people (1227 women) were considered for analyses. The prevalence of MHNO, MHO, MNHNO, and MNHO were 902 (39.9%), 138 (6.1%), 758 (33.5%), and 464 (20.5%), respectively. In the multivariate logistic regression models, those with MHO (OR 0.22; 95% CI 0.12-0.36), MNHNO (OR 0.52; 95% CI 0.4-0.66), and MNHO phenotypes (OR 0.22; 95% CI 0.16-0.3) had a significantly lower risk of osteoporosis. Likewise, those having MHO (OR 2.38; 95% CI 1.51-3.76), MNHNO (OR 1.49; 95% CI 1.11-2), and MNHO (OR 2.50; 95% CI 1.82-3.42) phenotypes were found to had higher risk of low bone quality as confirmed by TBS.

CONCLUSIONS

The obese subjects have lower bone quality, regardless of their obesity phenotype.