Low-Dose Aspirin for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Events in Elderly Japanese Patients with Atherosclerotic Risk Factors: Subanalysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial (JPPP-70)

Contrast-associated acute kidney injury in patients with diabetes mellitus following elective percutaneous coronary intervention: Insights from an iodixanol-acute kidney injury registry study

BACKGROUND

Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) are particularly susceptible to contrast-associated acute kidney injury (CA-AKI). However, few studies have evaluated CA-AKI stages in patients with DM following elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with iodixanol.

METHODS

Patients with DM who underwent elective PCI in 8 Chinese hospitals from May 2020 to November 2021 were prospectively enrolled in the Iodixanol-Acute Kidney Injury Registry (No. ChiCTR1800016719). According to the European Society of Urogenital Radiation on their CA-AKI diagnosis, and follow-up of major adverse renal and cardiovascular events (MARCE), CA-AKI and prognosis predictors were identified using logistic and Cox multivariable regression, respectively.

RESULTS

There were 1120 patients with DM included and the incidence of CA-AKI was 5.8 % (65/1120). However, most CA-AKI patients were at acute kidney injury stage 1 (96.9 %, 63/65). The dose of iodixanol was not an independent risk factor for CA-AKI, however, a hemoglobin level <110 g/L, a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <40 %, an estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73m2, an N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide level ≥300 pg/mL, and the use of loop diuretics were independent risk factors. Only 3.5 % (39/1120) of patients experienced MARCE. Hypertension, LVEF <40 %, hemoglobin level <110 g/L, and age >75 years old were independent risk factors for MARCE, while in comparison to indobufen, aspirin is an independent protective factor against MARCE in diabetic patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of CA-AKI in patients with DM who underwent PCI was low, mostly associated with mild renal impairment, and therefore did not increase the risk of MARCE.

Clinical practice guideline for the management of hypertension in China

In China, hypertension is the most common chronic non-communicable disease and the most significant risk factor for cardiovascular mortality among urban and rural residents. To standardize the clinical diagnosis and treatment of hypertension and to improve the prevention and control level of hypertension in China, Chinese Society of Cardiology, Chinese Medical Association; Hypertension Committee of Cross-Straits Medicine Exchange Association; Cardiovascular Disease Prevention and Rehabilitation Committee, Chinese Association of Rehabilitation Medicine, jointly collaborated to formulate the Clinical Practice Guideline for Hypertension Management in China. The Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to rate the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations, and the reporting items for practice guidelines in healthcare (RIGHT) were followed to establish the guideline. Detailed evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of 44 clinical questions in the field of hypertension, including essential and secondary hypertension, have been provided to guide clinical practice.

REGISTRATION

International Practice Guidelines Registry Platform, http://www.guidelines-registry.cn/ , No. IPGRP-2021CN346.

Prophylactic Effect of Aspirin and Other Medicine on Cerebral Infarction for Patients with Cardiovascular Diseases Risk Factors: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis

Stroke, as a type of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and cerebrovascular disease, has the risk of causing death or disability in patients. Aspirin, as an antipyretic and analgesic drug, can also treat or prevent CVDs. Previous studies have had conflicting results on the preventive effect of aspirin on cerebral infarction for patients with CVD risk factors. This review was carried out through a meticulous search of the Web of Science and PubMed databases. Articles were included or excluded based on predefined criteria. In terms of heterogeneity, a fixed effect model was utilized when I2 was less than 50%. Conversely, if the studies were deemed clinically comparable, a random effect model was implemented. The findings suggest that medical intervention significantly mitigates the risk of cerebral infarction in patients predisposed to CVDs [odds ratio (OR), 0.85; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.74-0.98; P = 0.03]. Interestingly, the preventive efficacy of medication appears to be higher in men (OR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.72-0.94; P = 0.004) than in women (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.69-1.01; P = 0.06). However, in terms of stroke prevention, no significant difference was observed between the use of aspirin (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.76-1.06; P = 0.19) and other medications (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.31-1.38; P = 0.26).

A Thorough Literature Review of the Potential Benefits and Drawbacks of Long-Term Aspirin Use for the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease

This article examines the role of aspirin in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. It highlights findings from major studies such as ASPREE (ASPirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly), ARRIVE (Aspirin to Reduce Risk of Initial Vascular Events), and ASPREE-XT (ASPirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly - eXTension) , among others. The review focuses on aspirin's role in primary prevention for specific populations including older adults, diabetics, hypertension patients, rheumatoid arthritis patients, kidney transplant recipients, and those with specific lipoprotein(a) genotypes, among other groups. We review these studies, noting aspirin's role in reducing events such as myocardial infarctions and its potential for increasing bleeding risks. The review also considers the implications for patients with kidney disease, referencing the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC) study and the International Polycap Study-3 (TIPS-3) trial. Additionally, it addresses the shifting paradigms in guidelines from the US Preventive Services Task Force and other entities, underscoring the importance of individualized aspirin use by balancing benefits against bleeding risks. The article further explores the concept of platelet reactivity, discusses strategies for improving adherence to aspirin therapy, and identifies existing research gaps, such as the phenomenon of aspirin resistance. It concludes by suggesting potential areas for future investigation to enhance understanding and application of aspirin in cardiovascular disease prevention.

Novel Pharmacological Therapies for the Management of Hyperlipoproteinemia(a)

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a well-established risk factor for cardiovascular disease, predisposing to major cardiovascular events, including coronary heart disease, stroke, aortic valve calcification and abdominal aortic aneurysm. Lp(a) is differentiated from other lipoprotein molecules through apolipoprotein(a), which possesses atherogenic and antithrombolytic properties attributed to its structure. Lp(a) levels are mostly genetically predetermined and influenced by the size of LPA gene variants, with smaller isoforms resulting in a greater synthesis rate of apo(a) and, ultimately, elevated Lp(a) levels. As a result, serum Lp(a) levels may highly vary from extremely low to extremely high. Hyperlipoproteinemia(a) is defined as Lp(a) levels > 30 mg/dL in the US and >50 mg/dL in Europe. Because of its association with CVD, Lp(a) levels should be measured at least once a lifetime in adults. The ultimate goal is to identify individuals with increased risk of CVD and intervene accordingly. Traditional pharmacological interventions like niacin, statins, ezetimibe, aspirin, PCSK-9 inhibitors, mipomersen, estrogens and CETP inhibitors have not yet yielded satisfactory results. The mean Lp(a) reduction, if any, is barely 50% for all agents, with statins increasing Lp(a) levels, whereas a reduction of 80-90% appears to be required to achieve a significant decrease in major cardiovascular events. Novel RNA-interfering agents that specifically target hepatocytes are aimed in this direction. Pelacarsen is an antisense oligonucleotide, while olpasiran, LY3819469 and SLN360 are small interfering RNAs, all conjugated with a N-acetylgalactosamine molecule. Their ultimate objective is to genetically silence LPA, reduce apo(a) production and lower serum Lp(a) levels. Evidence thus so far demonstrates that monthly subcutaneous administration of a single dose yields optimal results with persisting substantial reductions in Lp(a) levels, potentially enhancing CVD risk reduction. The Lp(a) reduction achieved with novel RNA agents may exceed 95%. The results of ongoing and future clinical trials are eagerly anticipated, and it is hoped that guidelines for the tailored management of Lp(a) levels with these novel agents may not be far off.

Acute, periprocedural and longterm antithrombotic therapy in older adults: 2022 Update by the ESC Working Group on Thrombosis

The first international guidance on antithrombotic therapy in the elderly came from the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Thrombosis in 2015. This same group has updated its previous report on antiplatelet and anticoagulant drugs for older patients with acute or chronic coronary syndromes, atrial fibrillation, or undergoing surgery or procedures typical of the elderly (transcatheter aortic valve implantation and left atrial appendage closure). The aim is to provide a succinct but comprehensive tool for readers to understand the bases of antithrombotic therapy in older patients, despite the complexities of comorbidities, comedications and uncertain ischaemic- vs. bleeding-risk balance. Fourteen updated consensus statements integrate recent trial data and other evidence, with a focus on high bleeding risk. Guideline recommendations, when present, are highlighted, as well as gaps in evidence. Key consensus points include efforts to improve medical adherence through deprescribing and polypill use; adoption of universal risk definitions for bleeding, myocardial infarction, stroke and cause-specific death; multiple bleeding-avoidance strategies, ranging from gastroprotection with aspirin use to selection of antithrombotic-drug composition, dosing and duration tailored to multiple variables (setting, history, overall risk, age, weight, renal function, comedications, procedures) that need special consideration when managing older adults.

The Use of Aspirin Increases the Risk of Major Adverse Cardiac and Cerebrovascular Events in Hypertensive Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea for the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: A Real-World Cohort Study

(1) Background: Hypertensive patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) are at high risk for cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), and the utility of aspirin for primary cardiovascular prevention in this population remains uncertain. (2) Methods: In this retrospective cohort study using data from the Urumchi Hypertension Database (UHDATA), hypertensive patients older than 18 years old with a first-time diagnosis of OSA were divided into three groups depending on aspirin history. Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) were the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included MACCE components, ischemic events, cardiac events, cerebrovascular events, and gastrointestinal bleeding risk. The inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method was used to balance the confounding factors among the groups, and the Cox proportional hazards model was used to calculate the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). (3) Results: In persistent aspirin users, the risk of MACCE events (HR 2.11, 95%CI 1.23-3.63), ischemic events (HR 2.58, 95%CI 1.42-4.69), cerebrovascular events (HR 2.55, 95%CI 1.44-4.51), and non-fatal cerebral infarction (HR 3.14, 95%CI 1.69-5.84) was significantly elevated. (4) Conclusions: Continuous aspirin use increases the incidence of cardiovascular adverse events in hypertensive patients with OSA receiving aspirin for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.

Risk of surgical failure and hemorrhagic complications associated with antithrombotic medication in glaucoma surgery

PURPOSE

The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine the extent to which the use of antithrombotic drugs during glaucoma surgery contributes to surgical failure and postsurgical hemorrhagic complications.

METHODS

Glaucoma surgeries were categorized into three groups: trabeculotomy (TLO), trabeculectomy (TLE), and long-Tube shunt surgery (Tube). At 1 year after surgery, the following criteria for surgical success were met: intraocular pressure (IOP) in the 5-21-mmHg range, IOP reduction of at least 20% from the preoperative level, and no additional glaucoma surgeries. We compared the percentages of the success rates and hemorrhagic complications between antithrombotic medication experiencers and non-experiencers. Furthermore, we adjusted the preoperative factors between the two groups using a propensity score analysis in TLO and TLE surgeries.

RESULTS

A total of 910 glaucoma surgeries were included, with TLO, TLE, and Tube accounting for 353, 444, and 113 surgeries, respectively. Preoperative antithrombotic medications were administered to 149 patients in all glaucoma surgeries: 37 patients used only anticoagulants, 102 used only antiplatelets, and 10 used both. There was no significant difference in the success rates of any of the procedures. The hemorrhagic complications (hyphema and vitreous hemorrhage rate) were significantly higher in the patients who underwent TLE and Tube. The surgical success rates of TLO and TLE were not significantly different after the two groups were matched by propensity score.

CONCLUSION

The perioperative use of antithrombotic drugs did not affect success for any of the procedures. However, it increased early postoperative hemorrhagic complications for TLE and Tube.

Aspirin Use to Prevent Cardiovascular Disease and Colorectal Cancer: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force

IMPORTANCE

Low-dose aspirin is used for primary cardiovascular disease prevention and may have benefits for colorectal cancer prevention.

OBJECTIVE

To review the benefits and harms of aspirin in primary cardiovascular disease prevention and colorectal cancer prevention to inform the US Preventive Services Task Force.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials through January 2021; literature surveillance through January 21, 2022.

STUDY SELECTION

English-language randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of low-dose aspirin (≤100 mg/d) compared with placebo or no intervention in primary prevention populations.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Single extraction, verified by a second reviewer. Quantitative synthesis using Peto fixed-effects meta-analysis.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Cardiovascular disease events and mortality, all-cause mortality, colorectal cancer incidence and mortality, major bleeding, and hemorrhagic stroke.

RESULTS

Eleven RCTs (N = 134 470) and 1 pilot trial (N = 400) of low-dose aspirin for primary cardiovascular disease prevention were included. Low-dose aspirin was associated with a significant decrease in major cardiovascular disease events (odds ratio [OR], 0.90 [95% CI, 0.85-0.95]; 11 RCTs [n = 134 470]; I2 = 0%; range in absolute effects, -2.5% to 0.1%). Results for individual cardiovascular disease outcomes were significant, with similar magnitude of benefit. Aspirin was not significantly associated with reductions in cardiovascular disease mortality or all-cause mortality. There was limited trial evidence on benefits for colorectal cancer, with the findings highly variable by length of follow-up and statistically significant only when considering long-term observational follow-up beyond randomized trial periods. Low-dose aspirin was associated with significant increases in total major bleeding (OR, 1.44 [95% CI, 1.32-1.57]; 10 RCTs [n = 133 194]; I2 = 4.7%; range in absolute effects, 0.1% to 1.0%) and in site-specific bleeding, with similar magnitude.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Low-dose aspirin was associated with small absolute risk reductions in major cardiovascular disease events and small absolute increases in major bleeding. Colorectal cancer results were less robust and highly variable.

The effect of aspirin in patients with nonvaricose upper gastrointestinal bleeding and risk factors analysis

OBJECTIVE

This paper aims to explore the effect of aspirin on the in-hospital mortality of patients with NVUGIB.

METHODS

An observational study retrospectively examined 1514 patients with NVUGIB based on a multi-center database.

RESULT

Our study reported a mortality rate of 4.8% in patients with NVUGIB, with 163 patients had a history of aspirin. Among 163 patients with an aspirin history, 76 patients (46.6%) continued to take aspirin in the hospital, with an average duration of 0.66 days after bleeding. Subsequent multivariate regression analysis showed heart rate (p <.001, OR = 0.978, 95%CI 0.969-0.987) and albumin (p =.019, OR = 0.658, 95%CI 0.464-0.933) were independent factors for aspirin-therapy after bleeding. Patients who received aspirin after NVUGIB (log-rank = 3.968, p =.046) had better survival than those who did not, but it was not an independent risk factor. The levels of albumin (p < .001, OR = 0.288, 95%CI 0.165-0.505) and INR (p =.013, OR = 1.166, 95%CI 1.033-1.316) and heart rate (p =.005, OR = 1.017, 95%CI 1.005-1.029) were independent factors of in-hospital mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

The independent risk factors for in-hospital mortality in patients with NVUGIB were albumin and INR and heart rate. The history of aspirin and the aspirin therapy after the bleeding did not affect the in-hospital mortality in patients with NVUGIB.

The Effect of Aspirin on the Primary Prevention of Major Adverse Cardiac and Cerebrovascular Events in Chinese Older Adults: A Registration Study

BACKGROUND

Low-dose acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) prevents stroke and myocardial infarction in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD), but whether it should be used for primary CVD prevention in older Chinese adults remains unclear.

METHODS

This prospective study investigated Chinese people aged > 70 years participating in the Kadoorie Study of Chronic Disease. The subjects were grouped as aspirin users and nonusers. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to achieve balanced baseline characteristics. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE). The secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality, cardiovascular and/or cerebrovascular disease (CCVD) mortality, and bleeding events. Survival curves were used to compare the outcomes between groups. Cox regression was used to identify the risk factors for the outcomes.

RESULTS

In total, 4791 participants were categorized as aspirin users (n = 257) or nonusers (n = 4534). PSM resulted in 252 and 951 participants in the aspirin user and nonuser groups, respectively. Median follow-up was 8.6 years. Aspirin did not influence MACCE, all-cause mortality, or bleeding events, but it did influence CCVD deaths (p = 0.019). Male sex (hazard ratio [HR] 1.652; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.217-2.243; p = 0.001), body mass index (BMI) (HR 1.053; 95% CI 1.008-1.100; p = 0.021), and systolic blood pressure (HR 1.009; 95% CI 1.003-1.016; p = 0.004) were independent risk factors for MACCE. Survival analysis showed higher rates of CCVD mortality among aspirin users (HR 1.363; 95% CI 1.040-1.786; p = 0.025), but this was not significant in the regression analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

There were no significant benefits from using aspirin as primary prevention for MACCE in older Chinese adults.

Aspirin in people with dementia, long-term benefits, and harms: a systematic review

PURPOSE

People with dementia may have indications for aspirin prescription and clinicians are asked to balance the potential risks against benefits. This review examines the evidence for the risk and benefit of long-term aspirin use in people with dementia aged over 65 years, including randomised controlled trials and observational studies.

METHODS

We searched three databases for research published between 2007 and 2020. Each eligible article was assessed for risk of bias, and confidence in findings was rated using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE).

RESULTS

Four papers met inclusion criteria: one randomised controlled trial, two cohort studies, and one with pooled data. All looked only at dementia of Alzheimer's type, and none addressed myocardial or cerebral infarction as outcomes. Dementia progression was reported by two studies, with conflicting results. The trial found no significant effect of aspirin on mortality (odds ratio aspirin vs. no aspirin 1.07, 95% confidence interval 0.58-1.97) but found more events of severe bleeding with aspirin (OR aspirin vs. no aspirin 6.9, 1.5-31.2). An excess in intracranial haemorrhage in the aspirin group was judged plausible based on two non-randomised studies.

CONCLUSIONS

The review findings are limited because studies include only people with Alzheimer's-type dementia and lack confirmatory studies, although an increased risk of bleeding events is recognised. Further research that addresses the benefits and risks of aspirin in more representative groups of people with dementia is needed to guide prescribing decisions.

Additive effect of dabigatran and high-dose aspirin in the development of haemorrhagic pleural effusion in a patient with tuberculous pleuritis

Tuberculous pleuritis can rarely cause haemorrhagic pleural effusion. Dabigatran etexilate can have an additive effect on increasing the risk of haemorrhage. Aspirin cannot cause major haemorrhage, but in the elderly it can cause gastrointestinal bleeding via ulceration of the gastrointestinal mucosa. We report here the case of a 77-year-old male who presented to the hospital with a 2-month history of progressive dyspnoea. He had been taking dabigatran etexilate (220 mg) and high-dose acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin; 300 mg) daily for chronic atrial fibrillation. A chest X-ray revealed a moderately sized right pleural effusion confirmed by a computed tomography scan, which also showed bronchiectasis of both lungs. Dabigatran was discontinued and aspirin was decreased to the minimal therapeutic dose of 100 mg before thoracentesis was performed. Lymphocyte-predominant (50%) haemorrhagic fluid of 500 ml was drained, positive for acid-fast bacilli smear and polymerase chain reaction of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. A chest tube was placed and an additional 1250 ml of haemorrhagic exudate drained out. We treated the patient with a routine regimen of antituberculous medication and the infection resolved without complications other than the bronchiectasis present before treatment. We think that the combination of dabigatran etexilate and high doses of aspirin increased the risk of pleural haemorrhage in this patient with tuberculous pleuritis.

Low-Dose Aspirin Use Among African American Older Adults

OBJECTIVES

Existing epidemiologic information shows disparities in low-dose aspirin use by race. This study investigates the frequency, pattern, and correlates of both self- and clinician-prescribed low-dose aspirin use among underserved African Americans aged 55 years and older.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study conducted a comprehensive evaluation of all over-the-counter and prescribed medications used among 683 African American older adults in South Central Los Angeles, California. Correlation between use of low-dose aspirin and sociodemographic variables, health care continuity, health behaviors, and several major chronic medical conditions were examined. In addition, the use of low-dose aspirin as self prescribed versus clinician prescribed was examined. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to examine correlates of low-dose aspirin use.

RESULTS

Overall, 37% of participants were taking low-dose aspirin. Sixty percent of low-dose aspirin users were taking low-dose aspirin as self prescribed and 40% were taking it as prescribed by a clinician. Major aspirin-drug interactions were detected in 75% of participants who used low-dose aspirin, but no significant differences in aspirin-drug interactions were found between those who used aspirin as self prescribed and those who used it as clinician prescribed. No negative association between being diagnosed with gastrointestinal conditions and aspirin used was detected. Being diagnosed with diabetes mellitus or a heart condition was associated with higher use of aspirin. However, only 50% with high risk of cardiovascular took prescribed (38%) or self-prescribed (62%) low-dose aspirin. One third of participants aged 70 years and older with low risk of cardiovascular were using aspirin.

CONCLUSIONS

Among underserved African-American middle-aged and older adults, many who could potentially benefit from aspirin are not taking it; and many taking aspirin have no indication to do so and risk unnecessary side effects. Compared with non-Hispanic Whites, African Americans are more likely to be diagnosed with diabetes, hypertension, and heart conditions at earlier stages of life; as a result, the role of preventive intervention, including safe and appropriate use of low-dose aspirin among this segment of our population, is more salient. Interventional studies are needed to promote safe and effective use of low-dose aspirin among underserved African-American adults.

Predictors of hemorrhagic stroke in older persons taking nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: Results from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System

BACKGROUND

Hemorrhagic strokes have not declined in the United States despite a decline worldwide.

PURPOSE

To identify hemorrhagic stroke risk associated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), other medications associated with increased risk for hemorrhagic stroke, and diabetes, cardiovascular disease, gender, and age.

METHODS

A post hoc design was used to examine predictors of hemorrhagic stroke for adults of age 65 years and older from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Events Reporting System database. The initial sample consisted of all cases reported during the third quarter of 2016 and the second quarter of 2018 with an NSAID as the primary suspect for the adverse drug event (ADE). An additional 397 cases with warfarin as the primary suspect were included in the final sample (N = 3,784) to test for bias from including only NSAID as the primary ADE suspect cases. Extracted data included the primary ADE (hemorrhagic stroke or other ADE), age, gender, primary suspect drug (NSAID or warfarin), and presence of a second NSAID, rivaroxaban, warfarin, clopidogrel, antidepressants (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, and tricyclic antidepressants), inhaled corticosteroids, diabetes, or cardiovascular medications. Logistic regression was used to predict hemorrhagic stroke.

RESULTS

Aspirin and warfarin increased the risk for hemorrhagic stroke by 3.458 and 3.059, respectively. Presence of an additional NSAIDs reduced the risk by 48%.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Hemorrhagic stroke risk specific to older adults may provide helpful estimates for practitioners as they weigh the risk benefit of prescribing aspirin as an antiplatelet therapy for older adults.

Efficacy of Aspirin in the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Diseases and Cancer in the Elderly: A Population-Based Cohort Study in Korea

INTRODUCTION

Aspirin is widely used to prevent cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). However, the balance of its benefits and risks in the primary prevention of CVDs and cancer is unclear, especially in elderly Asians. The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of aspirin in the primary prevention of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), bleeding risk, and cancer in elderly Koreans with cardiovascular (CV) risk factors.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study used data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service-Senior cohort database (2002-2015). Patients aged 60-90 years with hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), or dyslipidemia were identified. Aspirin users were compared with non-users using propensity score matching at a 1:3 ratio. The primary outcome was MACCE, a composite of CV mortality, myocardial infarction, and ischemic stroke. The secondary outcomes were the components of MACCE, all-cause mortality, angina pectoris, heart failure, the incidence and mortality of cancer, and the risks of hemorrhagic stroke and gastrointestinal bleeding. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using a Cox proportional hazard model.

RESULTS

A total of 3366 aspirin users and 10,089 non-users were finally included in the study. During a mean follow-up of 7.8 years, the incidence of MACCE was 15.2% in aspirin users and 22.4% in non-users. The risk of MACCE was significantly lower in aspirin users than in non-users (HR 0.76; 95% CI 0.69-0.85), and this risk was significantly reduced in patients using aspirin over 5 years (HR 0.52; 95% CI 0.46-0.60). Aspirin use was associated with a 21% reduction in the risk of primary cancer (HR 0.79; 95% CI 0.70-0.88) and cancer-related mortality (HR 0.72; 95% CI 0.61-0.84). No significant differences in bleeding risks were observed between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Aspirin reduced the risks of MACCE and cancer without increasing the bleeding risk in elderly Koreans with hypertension, T2DM, or dyslipidemia. Moreover, the benefits of the long-term use of aspirin in reducing the risks of MACCE were demonstrated. However, the decision of using aspirin for primary prevention must be carefully made on an individual basis, while estimating the benefit-risk balance of aspirin.