Multikinase Inhibitor-Induced Hand-Foot Skin Reaction: A Review of Clinical Presentation, Pathogenesis, and Management

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial Evaluating the Effect of Topical Urea for Secondary Prophylaxis of Hand Foot Skin Reaction in Renal Cell Cancer Patients on Sunitinib Therapy

INTRODUCTION

Hand foot skin reaction (HFSR) is a common dose-limiting adverse effect of multi kinase inhibitors (MKI) whose mechanism is not fully understood, and the prophylaxis is inadequate.

OBJECTIVE

In this pilot study, a double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial was conducted to evaluate the effect of topical urea in secondary prevention of sunitinib-induced HFSR in renal cell cancer patients.

METHODS

Out of 55 screened patients, 14 were randomized to receive topical urea or placebo for four weeks. The association of HFSR with drug levels of sunitinib and its metabolite (n-desethyl sunitinib), genetic polymorphism of VEGFR2 gene, quality of life (QOL) and biochemical markers was also assessed.

RESULTS

The results showed that urea-based cream was not superior to placebo (P = .075). There was no change in the QOL in both the groups. Single nucleotide polymorphism was checked for two nucleotides rs1870377 and rs2305948 located in VEGFR2 gene on chromosome 4. SNP (variant T > A) at rs1870377 was associated with appearance of new HFSR as compared to the wild type, although the association was not statistically significant (OR 0.714). There was no statistically significant difference between mean plasma levels of sunitinib and N-desethyl sunitinib in urea arm as compared to placebo arm as compared to placebo. The best fit population pharmacokinetic model for sunitinib was one compartment model with first order absorption and linear elimination. The median (IQR) of population parameters calculated from the population pharmacokinetics model for Ka, V and Cl was 0.22 (0.21-0.24) h-1, 4.4 (4.09-4.47) L, 0.049 (0.042-0.12) L/hr, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The study suggested that the urea-based cream was not superior to placebo in decreasing the appearance of new HFSR in renal cancer patients receiving 4:2 regimen of sunitinib.

Topical interventions for preventing hand-foot syndrome resulting from antineoplastic therapy: A scoping review

OBJECTIVE

To map topical interventions used to prevent hand-foot syndrome in cancer patients undergoing antineoplastic therapy.

METHOD

This is a scoping review reported in accordance with the recommendations of PRISMA-ScR (extension for scoping review) and the Joanna Briggs Institute Manual. The searches were carried out in the electronic databases CINAHL, Cochrane CENTRAL, EMBASE, LILACS, LIVIVO, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science; and gray literature (Google Scholar, Pro-Quest).

RESULTS

The searches resulted in 12,016 references and the final sample consisted of 45 studies. A total of 42 topical interventions were identified, including: moisturizing creams, corticosteroids, acids, mapisal, silymarin, and henna. However, urea was the most cited intervention (62%). As for the presentations of the interventions, they varied among creams, ointments, gels, hydrocolloids, decoctions, patches, powders, oils, and soaps.

CONCLUSION

The results allowed reviewing topical interventions, with emphasis on the use of urea and moisturizing creams. However, most of the interventions identified in this review require evaluation in future studies for better understanding of their benefits.

Cutaneous adverse reactions resulting from targeted cancer therapies: histopathologic and clinical findings

Targeted cancer treatments-designed to interfere with specific molecular signals responsible for tumor survival and progression-have shown benefit over conventional chemotherapies but may lead to diverse cutaneous adverse effects. This review highlights clinically significant dermatologic toxicities and their associated histopathologic findings, resulting from various targeted cancer drugs. Case reports and series, clinical trials, reviews, and meta-analyses are included for analysis and summarized herein. Cutaneous side effects resulting from targeted cancer therapies were reported with incidences as high as 90% for certain medications, and reactions are often predictable based on mechanism(s) of action of a given drug. Common and important reaction patterns included: acneiform eruptions, neutrophilic dermatoses, hand-foot skin reaction, secondary cutaneous malignancies, and alopecia. Clinical and histopathologic recognition of these toxicities remains impactful for patient care.

Digital tool to identify and monitor regorafenib-associated hand-foot skin reactions: A proof-of-concept study protocol

BACKGROUND

The FACET study is a prospective, open-label, low risk interventional clinical trial aiming at exploring the fitness-for-purpose and usability of an electronic device suite for the detection of hand-foot skin reaction symptoms in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with regorafenib.

METHODS

38 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer are being selected in 6 centers in France, and will be followed for 2 regorafenib treatment cycles, or for approximately 56 days. The electronic device suite includes connected insoles and a mobile device equipped with a camera and a companion application with electronic patient-reported outcomes questionnaires and educational material. The FACET study is intended to provide information useful for the improvement of the electronic device suite and its usability before the testing of its robustness in a larger follow-up study. This paper describes the protocol of the FACET study and discusses the limitations to consider for the implementation of digital devices in real-life practice.

Safety profile of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine-kinase inhibitors in pediatrics: a pharmacovigilance disproportionality analysis

Introduction: existing research on children consists primarily of phase I/II clinical trials for VEGFR-TKI. System reports of safety on the use of VEGFR-TKI in pediatrics are lacking. Aim: to investigate the safety profiles of VEGFR-TKI in pediatrics via the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Method: data regarding VEGFR-TKIs were extracted from the FAERS between 2004Q1 to 2022Q3 and categorized by the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA). Population characteristics were analyzed, and reporting odds ratio (ROR) was performed to identify risk signals associated with VEGFR-TKI. Results: 53,921 cases containing 561 children were identified in the database from 18 May 2005, to 30 September 2022. Among those in the system organ class, skin, subcutaneous tissue disorders, and blood and lymphatic system disorders in pediatrics contributed to over 140 cases. Palmar-plantar eythrodysesthesia syndrome (PPES) in VEGFR-TKI presented the most significant 340.9 (95% 229.2-507.0). And pneumothorax also gave a high reporting odds ratio of 48.9 (95% 34.7-68.9). For a specific drug, musculoskeletal pain gave a ROR of 78.5 (95% 24.4-252.6) in cabozantinib and oesophagitis in lenvatinib with a ROR of 95.2 (95% 29.5-306.9). Additionally, hypothyroidism presented a high signal, especially sunitinib, with a ROR of 107.8 (95% 37.6-308.7). Conclusion: the present study explored the safety profile of VEGFR-TKI in pediatrics using the FAERS database. Multiple skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders, as well as blood and lymphatic system disorders, were common VEGFR-TKI-related AEs in system organ class. No serious hepatobiliary AEs were detected. For the specific AEs, PPES and pneumothorax were VEGFR-TKI-related AEs that presented significantly higher signals than those in the general population.

Clinical characteristics, treatment outcomes, and prognosis in patients with MKIs-associated hand-foot skin reaction: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Multikinase inhibitors (MKIs) treatment has been proven as a powerful strategy in cancer therapy. However, it is greatly hampered by its common adverse effect known as hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR), especially in patients with moderate-to-severe HFSR.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinical characteristics, histopathological features, treatment response, and bio-indicators of HFSR.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 102 patients with moderate-to-severe HFSR resulting from MKIs therapy.

RESULTS

The median time to development of moderate-to-severe HFSR was 18 days, which would be significantly affected by the type of MKIs and the history of HFSR. Notably, we found that HFSR was classified into three consecutive stages: erythematous lesion, yellow hyperkeratotic lesion with surrounding erythema, and hyperkeratotic lesion. Inflammation was observed in the first two stages of HFSR, but disappeared in the third stage; in contrast, the hyperkeratosis gradually became thicker from stage one to stage three. Moreover, topical medications were demonstrated as an effective therapy for HFSR, among which, the topical steroids and urea ointment treatment response rate was 37.14%, the Shouzu Ning Decoction (SND) treatment response rate was 65%, and the SND in combination with urea ointment treatment response rate was 75%, meanwhile, systemic therapies did not improve the therapeutic efficacy of topical medications alone. In addition, the serum levels of HMGB1 were found to be a potential indicator for tracking the healing process as well as predicting the prognosis of HFSR.

CONCLUSION

This study revealed the potential factors affecting the development of HFSR, evaluated the therapeutic response towards different strategies for treating HFSR, and identified a potential prognostic indicator of HFSR.

The Efficacy and Safety of the Shouzu Ning Decoction Treatment Versus Halometasone Plus Celecoxib Treatment in Patients With Grade 2 HFSR: A Randomized Clinical Trial

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effects of the Shouzu Ning Decoction (SND) and Halometasone plus Celecoxib (Hal/Cxb) as therapy in patients with grade 2 hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty patients with grade 2 HFSR participated in a randomized, single-center, open-label study. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive the SND or Hal/Cxb treatment, twice daily for 4 weeks, followed by 4 weeks of post-treatment follow-up. The primary endpoint was clinical remission of HFSR at the end of the fourth week (W4). The secondary endpoints were recurrence rate, quality of life (QoL), pain intensity, and safety.

RESULTS

In this study, 46 patients successfully completed the study, and 4 patients were excluded. There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups on demographic and baseline clinical characteristics. In the SND group, 56.52% of patients showed clinical remission at W4, which was significantly superior to that achieved in the Hal/Cxb group (26.09%, P = .036). In addition, the HF-QoL score was statistically lower in the SND group compared to the Hal/Cxb group at W2 (P = .007), W3 (P = .005), and W4 (P = .005), respectively. In line with this, the inter-group difference in NRS score was statistically significant (P = .004).

CONCLUSION

In the present study, SND treatment has been observed to be effective and well tolerated for patients with grade 2 HFSR. Thus, SND treatment could be considered a suitable option for HFSR patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR1900027518. Registered on 17 Nov 2019.

Nitric oxide in multikinase inhibitor-induced hand-foot skin reaction

Hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR) is the most debilitating and prevalent side effect caused by multikinase inhibitors (MKIs) that share vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) as the common inhibition target, such as sorafenib, regorafenib, axitinib, etc. Though not life-threatening, HFSR can significantly deteriorate patients' quality of life and jeopardize the continuity of cancer therapy. Despite years of efforts, there are no FDA-approved treatments for HFSR and the understanding of the precise pathogenic mechanism is still limited. In this study, we hypothesized that nitric oxide has the potential therapeutic effect to reverse the toxicity caused by MKI through upregulation of several VEGF/VEGFR downstream signaling pathways. We found that glyceryl trinitrate (GTN), a nitric oxide donor, could stimulate cell proliferation, migration, and protect cells from apoptosis induced by MKIs in vitro. Local application of GTN mitigated tissue damage in a rat model, while not impacting the anti-tumor effect of the MKI in HepG2 tumor-bearing mice. Finally, GTN ointment alleviated cutaneous damages and improved quality of life in 6 HFSR patients. Our study proposed and validated the mechanism to counteract VEGFR inhibition, providing GTN as the potential treatment to MKI-induced HFSR, which may further improve the therapeutic window of various MKI based cancer therapies.

Discrimination of hand-foot skin reaction caused by tyrosine kinase inhibitors based on direct keratinocyte toxicity and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 inhibition

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are molecular-targeted anticancer drugs. Their benefits are limited by dermal toxicities, including hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR), which is commonly found in skin areas subjected to friction. The present study aimed to explain the incidence of HFSR in patients treated with TKIs by focusing on keratinocyte toxicity and inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR), which plays an essential role in angiogenesis. Mice with gene knockout for the immunosuppressive cytokine interleukin-10 exhibited HFSR-like phenotypes, such as cytotoxicity in keratinocytes and increased number and size of blood vessels after repeated doses of regorafenib, sorafenib, and pazopanib, all of which cause high incidence of HFSR, in combination with tape-stripping mimicking skin damage at the friction site. Comprehensive examination of the direct cytotoxic effects of 21 TKIs on primary cultured human keratinocytes revealed that 18 of them reduced the cell viability dose-dependently. Importantly, the ratio of the trough concentration in patients (C_trough) to the LC₅₀ values of cell viability reduction was higher than unity for four HFSR-inducing TKIs, suggesting that these TKIs cause keratinocyte toxicity at clinically relevant concentrations. In addition, eight HFSR-inducing TKIs caused inhibition of VEGFR-2 kinase activity, which was validated by their ratios of C_trough to the obtained IC_50,VEGFR-2 of more than unity. All 12 TKIs with no reported incidence of HFSR exhibited less than unity values for both C_trough/LC_{50,keratinocytes} and C_trough/IC_50,VEGFR-2. These results suggested that a combination of keratinocyte toxicity and VEGFR-2 inhibition may explain the incidence of HFSR upon TKI usage in humans.

Cutaneous toxicities from targeted therapies used in oncology: Literature review of clinical presentation and management

•

Cutaneous toxicities are frequent with targeted therapies.

•

Managing cutaneous toxicities is critical for life-saving treatment continuation.

•

Dermatologists can provide a key input in preventing and managing these toxicities.

With the development of molecular targeted therapies, a wide array of dermatologic toxicities is appearing. Their prevention, recognition, and management by dermatologists is critical to ensure antineoplastic treatment continuation. The objective of this study was to provide a literature review of the most common dermatologic toxicities due to targeted therapies in oncologic patients, including their clinical presentation, prevention, and management.

Cutaneous toxicity of FDA-approved small-molecule kinase inhibitors

INTRODUCTION

By 1 January 2021, the FDA has approved a total of 62 small-molecule kinase inhibitors (SMKIs). The increasing clinical use of small-molecule kinase inhibitors has led to some side effects, the most common of which is cutaneous toxicity, as reflected by approximately 90% (57 of 62) of the FDA-approved SMKIs have reported treatment-related cutaneous toxicities. Since these cutaneous toxicities may have a crucial influence on the emotional, physical and psychosocial health of the patients, it is of great importance for doctors, patients, oncologists and interrelated researchers to be aware of the cutaneous side effects of these drugs in order to make the diagnosis accurate and the treatment appropriate.

AREAS COVERED

This review aims to summarize the potential cutaneous toxicities and the frequency of occurrence of FDA-approved 62 SMKIs, and provide a succinct overview of the potential mechanisms of certain cutaneous toxicities. The literature review was performed based on PubMed database and FDA official website.

EXPERT OPINION

It is significant to determine the risk factors for SMKI-induced cutaneous toxicity. The mechanisms underlying SMKI-induced cutaneous toxicities remain unclear at present. Future research should focus on the mechanisms of SMKI-induced cutaneous toxicities to find out mechanistically driven therapies.

FMS-Like Tyrosine Kinase 3 Inhibitors for the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the most common acute leukemia of adults, with a five-year survival that remains poor (approximately 25%). Knowledge and understanding of AML genomics have expanded tremendously over the past decade and are now included in AML prognostication and treatment decisions. FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) is a Class III receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) expressed primarily in the cell membranes of early hematopoietic progenitor cells, found in 28% of all patients with AML. FLT3 is the second most frequent mutation in adult AML following Nuclear-cytoplasmic shuttling phosphoprotein (NPM1), which is found in 50% of cases.¹ FLT3 inhibitors are promising new molecular therapeutics increasingly becoming standard of care for both newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory FLT3 positive AML. This review will focus on the clinical trials/evidence, similarities, differences, clinical toxicities, and drug interactions relevant to treating clinicians as pertains to 5 FLT3-inhibitors: midostaurin, sorafenib, gilteritinib, crenolanib, and quizartinib.

Hyperkeratotic Skin Adverse Events Induced by Anticancer Treatments: A Comprehensive Review

Hyperkeratotic skin adverse events are a group of toxic effects, characterized by the disruption of epidermal homeostasis and interaction with keratinocyte proliferation/differentiation or keratinocyte survival, and frequently reported with systemic anticancer treatments. These types of reactions include hand-foot skin reaction or palmoplantar keratoderma, induced psoriasis, keratosis pilaris-like or pityriasis rubra pilaris-like rashes, Grover's disease, and contact hyperkeratosis. Cutaneous squamoproliferative lesions are also described because of the presence of abnormal keratinocyte proliferation. They are usually observed with tyrosine kinase inhibitors but have also been described in association with cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents. Their pathogenesis is related mainly to the disruption of epidermal homeostasis and interaction with keratinocyte proliferation/differentiation or keratinocyte survival caused by anticancer treatment. Early recognition and adequate management are critical to prevent exacerbation of the lesions, to limit treatment interruption, and to minimize impairment of quality of life. This review summarizes the current knowledge concerning the presentation, pathogenesis, and management of secondary hyperkeratotic reactions to anticancer therapies. It also includes hyperkeratotic reactions that have been more recently described with newly approved targeted therapies or immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as keratosis pilaris-like exanthema with second-generation BCR-ABL inhibitors, lamellar ichthyosis-like lesions with ponatinib, pityriasis rubra pilaris with the newly approved selective phosphoinositide 3 kinase inhibitor idelalisib, or psoriasis with anti-programmed death-1 and programmed death ligand-1.

Apatinib-Induced Hand-Foot Skin Reaction in Chinese Patients With Liver Cancer

Apatinib, an anti-tumor drug selectively targeting VEGFR2 (Vascular Endothelia Growth Factor Recpetor-2), has been proven effective in Chinese patients with liver cancer. Generally, treatment with apatinib achieves 16.1% of the overall objective remission rate (ORR) and 55.83% of the disease control rate (DCR) in Chinese patients with liver cancer. However, the prevalence of apatinib-induced hand–foot skin reaction (AI-HFSR) is noticeably high. The incidence of AI-HFSR is about 50.5%, of which Grades 1/2 and 3 are 38.8 and 11.6%, respectively. In addition, potential molecular mechanisms underlying the development of AI-HFSR are poorly understood and urgently needed to be investigated histologically. In this review, we summarize and review the current efficacy of apatinib and the prevalence of AI-HFSR in Chinese patients with liver cancer. Besides, we postulate the potential mechanisms underlying the development of AI-HFSR and discuss the optimal clinical management for this unwanted cutaneous side effect.

How to conduct integrated pharmaceutical care for patients with hand-foot syndrome associated with chemotherapeutic agents and targeted drugs

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this article was to offer practical operational process for pharmacists to successfully conduct integrated pharmaceutical care for patients with hand-foot syndrome associated with chemotherapeutic agents and targeted drugs which may facilitate the work of first-line clinical pharmacist.Data sources: A literature review was conducted in March 2020 of Pubmed, Medline, and EMBASE (2010-2020) using terms such as: hand-foot syndrome, hand-foot skin reaction, palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia, chemotherapeutic agent, and multikinase inhibitor. Appropriate references from selected articles were also used.Data summary: This paper involves 81 articles including review articles, meta-analysis, and clinical trials which focused on every aspect of hand-foot syndrome, such as manifestation, mechanism, occurrence rate, onset time, patient education, self-monitor scale, and management. Studies were thematically divided into four parts (clinical presentation of HFS, risk stratification, initiation of pharmaceutic care, and management of the adverse reaction).

CONCLUSION

HFS is one of the common adverse events which was associated with many chemotherapeutic agents and multikinase inhibitor drugs. Although the mechanisms and histopathology may be different, they due share some common clinical manifestations. As part of integrated pharmaceutical care for cancer patients, it is important to conduct patient education about the risk of hand-foot syndrome and basic knowledge about hand-foot syndrome management before initiating anticancer therapy. Once hand-foot syndrome happens, evidence-based management could try. If the hand-foot syndrome is intolerable, dose reduction or discontinuation of the anticancer therapy should be considered.

The Efficacy and Safety of the Shouzu Ning Decoction Treatment for Multi-Kinase Inhibitors-Associated Severe Hand-Foot Skin Reaction

Background

Multi-kinase inhibitors (MKIs) treatment plays an important role in cancer therapy, but still suffers from a high incidence of hand–foot skin reaction (HFSR), leading to MKIs dose modification or termination. Thus, there is a high need for therapeutic strategy for HFSR.

Patients and Methods

This prospective analysis included twenty patients, who were continuously administered with MKIs treatment and presented with a grade 3 HFSR during January 2018 to December 2019. All the patients were treated with the Shouzu Ning Decoction (SND) twice a day, in addition to the MKIs treatment. Grading of HFSR was assessed by National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. Pain intensity was evaluated using the numerical rating scale (NRS). Quality of life was assessed using the Hand–Foot Quality of Life Scale (HF-QoLS).

Results

The median time from MKIs initiation to onset of grade 3 HFSR was 26.2 days. Following the SND treatment, seventeen (17/20) patients displayed grade 2 HFSR with a median time of 5.1 days. Among whom, seven (7/17) finally transformed to grade 1 with a median time of 9.9 days. While all of the grade 1 patients (7/7) had local recurrence, and retreatment of the SND was effective. In addition, after the SND treatment, the score of NRS and HF-QoLS decreased to 1.60 ± 1.14 (P < 0.01) and 26.75 ± 11.76 (P < 0.01), respectively.

Conclusion

The SND treatment could alleviate symptoms, relieve pain and improve quality of life in HFSR patients. The SND treatment was proved to be an effective and well-tolerated treatment for MKIs-associated grade 3 HFSR patients for the first time. Indeed, further randomized controlled trails with large-scale, multi-center are require to fully determine the clinical application of the SND in MKIs-associated HFSR.

A clinical and histological comparison between acute cutaneous graft-versus-host disease and other maculopapular eruptions following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a retrospective cohort

BACKGROUND

Prompt management of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) may prevent its morbidity and mortality. Maculopapular (MP) eruption is a presenting sign of acute GVHD, but differentiation from other causes of MP rash is challenging.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted among patients developing MP eruptions after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. We compared the clinical and histopathological differences between an acute cutaneous GVHD (group 1) and other MP eruptions (group 2). We also determined the clinical prognostic indicators linked to acute GVHD severity, morbidity, and mortality.

RESULTS

Of 95 patients identified, 75 met the classification criteria for acute GVHD, and 25 had other MP eruptions. Palm and/or sole involvement was more frequently found (51.4% vs. 12%, odds ratio [OR] [95% confidence interval] = 7 [2.1, 23.7], P < 0.01 and 41.4% vs. 0%, OR 37.2 [2.2, 635], P < 0.01, respectively) in group 1 than in group 2. Comparing the histological features between the two groups, necrotic keratinocytes in basal and spinous layers (92.9% vs. 22.2%, OR 27 [3.5, 594.7], P < 0.01) and (85.7% vs. 33.3%, OR 9.3 [1.4, 60.8], P = 0.02, respectively), diffuse basal vacuolization (42.9% vs. 0%, OR 14.5 [0.7, 298.2], P = 0.04), lymphocyte satellitosis (71.4% vs. 0%, OR 44.3 [2.1, 936.8], P < 0.01), and subepidermal clefts (42.9% vs. 0%, OR 14.5 [0.7, 298.2], P = 0.04) were significantly more apparent in group 1. Among extracutaneous presentations, diarrhea alone and/or accompanied by hyperbilirubinemia (47.1% vs. 16%, OR 4.3 [1.4, 13.1], P = 0.03 and 27.1% vs. 0%, OR 19.3 [1.1, 332.8], P < 0.01, respectively) and newly developed transaminitis (37.1% vs. 12%, OR 3.3 [1.1, 12.6], P = 0.02) suggested the diagnosis of acute GVHD. Mucosal involvement and/or blister formation correlated with severe acute GVHD (OR 26.6 [5.4, 130.4], P < 0.01). Skin and systemic GVHD severity correlated with time to rash resolution (P = 0.03 and P = 0.04, respectively), length of hospital stays (P < 0.01 and P < 0.01, respectively), and mortality (OR 4.87 [1.4, 17.4], P = 0.02 and OR 4.6 [1.3, 16.5], P = 0.02, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings may be beneficial tools for establishing the diagnosis of acute GVHD.

Cutaneous adverse events in patients receiving anticancer therapy in a tertiary hospital setting: the old and the new

BACKGROUND

Targeted therapies and immunotherapies are increasingly prescribed, but classic chemotherapy agents are still highly used in cancer treatment. Both therapies, the old and the new, are associated with cutaneous adverse events (CAEs) that can cause treatment interruptions or reduce the quality of life of patients.

METHODS

An observational, cross-sectional, single-center study that included consecutive cancer patients presenting CAEs. The main objective was to describe CAEs derived from antineoplastic drugs. Secondary objectives were to determine the number and severity of CAEs and if there were differences regarding CAEs between conventional chemotherapeutics and targeted therapies.

RESULTS

A total of 114 patients were included with a total number of 177 CAEs. Of the 114 patients, 64 presented a single CAE, 37 patients had two CAEs, and 13 patients presented three CAEs. The most frequent CAEs were pruritus, xerosis, palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE), and alopecia. The majority of CAEs were mild (63.2%), followed by moderate (29.9%) and severe (6.7%) CAEs. Of the 114 patients, 103 (90.3%) received topical agents and 11 (9.7%) required systemic treatment for the management of CAEs. Prophylactic treatment for CAE was delivered to only 4/114 (3.5%) patients. No significant differences were found in the number or severity of CAEs between conventional chemotherapy and targeted therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Close collaboration between oncologists and dermatologists is essential to start preventive measures on time, enhance patient education, and avoid unnecessary dose reductions or treatment interruptions. The multidisciplinary approach can offer better management of skin toxicities.

Protective effect of adenosine triphosphate against sunitinib-related skin damage in rats

Cutaneous side effects associated with sunitinib use are a major problem in patients receiving cancer treatment. The aim of this study was to investigate the protective effect of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) against possible skin damage resulting from sunitinib use in rats. Thirty Albino Winstar rats were divided into the following three groups: healthy controls (HCs, n = 10), sunitinib (SUN, n = 10), and sunitinib + ATP (SAT, n = 10). ATP was injected intraperitoneally at a dose of 2 mg/kg. One hour subsequent to the administration of ATP and 0.9% NaCl, the SAT and SUN groups were orally administered a dose of 25 mg/kg sunitinib to the stomach. Macroscopic evaluation of the skin indicated lower levels of skin damage in the SAT group than in the SUN group. As an indicator of oxidative stress, malondialdehyde (MDA), total oxidant status (TOS), and oxidative stress index (OSI) levels were significantly higher in the SUN group than in the HC group, while total glutathione (tGSH) and total antioxidant status (TAS) levels were significantly lower. However, MDA, TOS, and OSI levels were significantly lower in the SAT group than in the SUN group, while tGSH and TAS levels were significantly higher. Histopathological examination revealed keratin plugs with edema, vasopathology, and inflammatory cell infiltration in the SUN group. The SAT group showed less necrotic epithelium, keratin plugs, edema, and vasopathology than the SUN group. ATP can be effective in preventing skin damage caused by sunitinib use by reducing oxidative stress.

Clinical study for external Chinese herbal medicine LC09 treating hand-foot skin reaction associated with the antitumor targeted drugs: Protocol for a prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind, and monocentric clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Molecular targeted anticancer drugs such as multikinase inhibitors have shown obvious therapeutic advantages in a variety of tumors. The occurrence of hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR) is positively correlated with therapeutic effect, but it is also the most common cause of dose limiting toxicity for this treatment. This can lead to interruption or decrement of the treatment, a reduction in quality of life for patients, as well as potentially leading to secondary infections. As a result, the curative effect of targeted anticancer drugs will be negatively impacted. Currently, there is no certain and effective therapy. External use of Chinese herb medicine LC09 in the early treatment of HFSR has shown positive outcomes, but it is necessary to carry out further clinical research to confirm.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of topical soaks of Chinese herbal medicine LC09 for HFSR induced by molecular targeted anticancer drugs.

METHODS

The trial is a prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind, monocentric, and interventional study. A total of 66 patients with HFSR will be recruited and randomly assigned to receive either LC09 Granules or placebo. The primary outcomes are the assessment of HFSR grade and pain score. The secondary outcomes are the evaluation of the quality of life, incidence of targeted drug dosage reduction, and incidence of targeted drug withdrawal.

DISCUSSION

This prospective, randomized clinical trial will provide valuable data regarding the efficacy and safety of topical soak treatments with LC09 granules for HFSR. Positive results would provide evidence-based complementary therapeutic approach future treatments of HFSR.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, http://www.chictr.org.cn, ChiCTR1900023679. Registered on 7 June 2019.

Sorafenib-associated hand-foot skin reaction: practical advice on diagnosis, mechanism, prevention, and management

Introduction: Sorafenib is a multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor, which has been mainly used in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and renal cancer. However, hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR), as one of the most common adverse reactions, have hindered its long-term clinical application. At present, the mechanism of its occurrence has not been clearly studied and it leads to the lack of effective means of intervention. This article reviews known mechanism and management methods of HFSR caused by sorafenib.Areas covered: The author reviews HFSR caused by the treatment of sorafenib including the mechanism and management. English language reports located through PubMed are reviewed.Expert opinion: There are some conjectures about the mechanism of HFSR. However, the mechanism of HFSR induced by sorafenib is still unclear at present. In the absence of understanding the mechanism of HFSR, the most common method for clinical treatment of sorafenib-induced HFSR is dose down-regulation or discontinuation of treatment, which affects efficacy and even survival. Future research should focus on the mechanism of HFSR to find out new ways for prevention. Precautionary measures before the occurrence of HFSR can also be studied in the future.

Safety and Efficacy of Bis-Glyceryl Ascorbate (Amitose DGA) to Prevent Hand-Foot Skin Reaction in Patients With Renal Cell Carcinoma Receiving Sunitinib Therapy: Protocol for a Phase I/II, Uncontrolled, Single-Arm, Open-Label Trial

Background

Hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR) is a serious side effect induced by multiple-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). HFSR can cause treatment interruption or decreased dosing. HFSR also markedly decreases quality of life and is associated with the therapeutic efficacy of multiple-TKIs. Therefore, the management and prevention of HFSR is an important issue; however, an effective method for its prevention has not been established. Specific ascorbic acid derivatives can reverse multiple-TKI-induced keratinocyte growth and pathological changes in vitro.

Objective

This study was designed to evaluate the safety of bis-glyceryl ascorbate (Amitose DGA), a novel, hydrosoluble, and moisturizing ascorbic acid derivative, in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) receiving sunitinib therapy. This study was also designed to evaluate Amitose DGA’s preventive efficacy for sunitinib-induced HFSR.

Methods

This is a Phase I/II, single-center, uncontrolled, single-arm, open-label trial. We will recruit a total of 30 patients with RCC receiving sunitinib therapy, with a 2-week-on and 1-week-off schedule. The participants will apply Amitose DGA-containing cream over both palmar and plantar surfaces within two treatment cycles (ie, 6 weeks) of sunitinib in combination with a general moisturizing agent, in addition to standard-of-care processes. Safety assessments will include dermatological abnormalities, clinical laboratory tests, and incidence of adverse events. Efficacy assessments will include development of HFSR and therapeutic outcomes associated with sunitinib.

Results

Recruitment to the study began in August 2017 and is ongoing in Japan. To date, 21 subjects have been recruited. Study completion is expected in 2021.

Conclusions

This is the first clinical study of Amitose DGA-containing cream in patients with RCC who are receiving sunitinib therapy. The single-center, single-arm, open-label design was selected to maximize subject exposure and increase the likelihood of achieving our study endpoints. The results will provide valuable and preliminary evidence of the effects of Amitose DGA-containing cream on HFSR.

Trial Registration

UMIN Clinical Trials Registry UMIN000027209; https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr /ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000031174

International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)

DERR1-10.2196/14636

Adherence to a topical moisturizing preparation for regorafenib-related hand-foot skin reaction

OBJECTIVE

Application of topical moisturizing preparations is important for the prevention and palliation of hand-foot skin reaction induced by multi-kinase inhibitor. Application adherence of topical moisturizing preparations in clinical practice has rarely been reported. This study investigated the factors affecting adherence to the application of topical moisturizing preparations in patients administered regorafenib.

METHODS

The subjects were patients administered regorafenib (n = 118). Consumption of a urea-based moisturizing ointment, hand-foot skin reaction grade (CTC-AE ver 3.0), treatment duration, and dose of regorafenib, factors that might affect the onset of symptoms and adherence, including age, sex, presence of a key person, working status, performance status, past use of capecitabine or epidermal growth factor receptor antibodies, and relative dose intensity were retrospectively investigated. The adherence to the topical moisturizing ointment (<21 g per week) was judged as poor. The data were analyzed by logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Working status was associated with poor adherence, showing a positive correlation (odds ratio; 3.024, p = 0.023). In contrast, symptom grade of hand-foot skin reaction and regorafenib relative dose intensity showed negative correlation with poor adherence (odds ratio; 0.971, p = 0.012, and 0.485, p < 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that adherence decreases in patients with working. The relative dose intensity of regorafenib decreased when adherence to topical moisturizing ointments decreased. Severe hand-foot skin reaction could be associated with adherence. Patients consciously might not apply the ointment when hand-foot skin reaction did not become severe. It will be problematic for medical personnel to motivate patients for improving adherence to the use of moisturizing ointments.

Large-Scale, Prospective Observational Study of Regorafenib in Japanese Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in a Real-World Clinical Setting

BACKGROUND

Regorafenib improved the overall survival (OS) of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who progress after standard therapies in two phase III trials. The present large-scale prospective observational study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of regorafenib administered to Japanese patients with mCRC in real-life setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with mCRC were prospectively registered and initially received ≤160 mg oral regorafenib daily, at the investigator's discretion, for weeks 1-3 of each 4-week cycle. The study's primary aim was to assess safety, particularly unexpected clinically significant adverse drug reactions (ADRs). A Cox's proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the association between OS, hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR), and baseline characteristics.

RESULTS

We evaluated 1,227 of 1,301 patients (enrolled from March 2013 to May 2015). ADRs occurred in 89.3% of patients (mostly within the first 4 weeks) and were a major reason for discontinuing treatment. The most frequent ADRs were HFSR, liver injury, and hypertension. The cumulative incidence of HFSR and liver injury was higher in patients who initially received 160 mg than in those who received ≤120 mg. The incidence of hypertension and fatigue was similar between groups. Median OS was 6.9 months (95% confidential interval, 6.4-7.4). OS was associated with early onset of HFSR and good performance status (PS) but not with the initial dose.

CONCLUSION

The outcomes of this study were consistent with those of clinical trials. There were no new safety concerns. Regorafenib treatment would not be recommended for patients with higher PS.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Previous clinical trials demonstrated regorafenib improved overall survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who progress after standard chemotherapies. Because the eligibility criteria of the trials were restricted compared with a real-world setting, the data from the trials may not fully represent the profiles of regorafenib in clinical practice. This large-scale observational study showed that the safety and effectiveness of regorafenib in clinical practice were generally consistent with previous trials. The majority of patients reported adverse drug reactions within the first 4 weeks, most commonly hand-foot skin reaction. Regorafenib treatment would not be recommended for patients with higher performance status.

Kidney Cancer: Toxicity Management, Symptom Control, and Palliative Care

The challenges of managing the toxicities associated with the current armamentarium to combat kidney cancer continue to grow. It is therefore paramount for providers to not only have knowledge of the disease, but to also have an understanding of the potential adverse effects associated with the various treatments. In addition, it is important to incorporate palliative care strategies to help manage symptoms, improve quality of life, and support patients and their families throughout the continuum of the disease. This article will discuss the general toxicities and symptomatic issues encountered in patients with kidney cancer who are receiving targeted therapies and immunotherapies. It will also define the components of palliative care and its benefits. The recommendations in this article are from source documentation noted in various guidelines of the Oncology Nursing Society, ASCO, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, and the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer. We feel it is appropriate to modify and individualize management as deemed necessary to provide the best outcome for patients and their families.

Clinical management of cutaneous adverse events in patients on targeted anticancer therapies and immunotherapies: a national consensus statement by the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology

Progress in the understanding of many tumors has enabled the development of new therapies, such as those targeted at specific molecules involved in cell growth (targeted therapies) or intended to modulate the immune system (immunotherapy). However, along with the clinical benefit provided by these new treatments, new adverse effects have also appeared. Dermatological toxicities such as papulopustular eruptions, xerosis, and pruritus are common with EGFR inhibitors. Other adverse effects have also been described with PDGFR, BCR-ABL, and MAPK tyrosine kinase inhibitors, antiangiogenic drugs, and inhibitors at immune checkpoints such as CTLA-4 and PD-1/PD-L1. Onset of these adverse effects often causes dose reductions and/or delays in administering the prescribed therapy, which can affect patient survival and quality of life. It is, therefore, important to prevent the occurrence of these adverse effects, or to treat unavoidable ones as soon as possible. This requires cooperation between medical oncologists and dermatologists. This article reviews the various dermatological toxicities associated with targeted therapies and immunotherapies, along with their diagnosis and therapeutic management.

Severe cutaneous adverse reactions induced by targeted anticancer therapies and immunotherapies

With the increasing use of targeted anticancer drugs and immunotherapies, there have been a substantial number of reports concerning life-threatening severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs), including Stevens–Johnson syndrome (SJS), toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms, drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome, and acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis. Although the potential risks and characteristics for targeted anticancer agent- and immunotherapy-induced SCAR were not well understood, these serious adverse reactions usually result in morbidity and sequela. As a treatment guideline for this devastating condition is still unavailable, prompt withdrawal of causative drugs is believed to be a priority of patient management. In this review, we outline distinct types of SCARs caused by targeted anticancer therapies and immunotherapies. Also, we discuss the clinical course, latency, concomitant medication, tolerability of rechallenge or alternatives, tumor response, and mortality associated with these devastating conditions. Imatinib, vemurafenib, and rituximab were the top three offending medications that most commonly caused SJS/TEN, while EGFR inhibitors were the group of drugs that most frequently induced SJS/TEN. For drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms/drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome and acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis, imatinib was also the most common offending drug. Additionally, we delineated 10 SCAR cases related to innovative immunotherapies, including PD1 and CTLA4 inhibitors. There was a wide range of latency periods: 5.5–91 days (median). Only eight of 16 reported patients with SCAR showed clinical responses. Targeted anticancer drugs and immunotherapies can lead to lethal SCAR (14 deceased patients were identified as suffering from SJS/TEN). The mortality rate of TEN was high: up to 52.4%. The information compiled herein will serve as a solid foundation to formulate ideas for early recognition of SCAR and to discontinue offending drugs for better management.

Multikinase inhibitor sorafenib induces skin toxicities in tumor-bearing mice

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the pathologic changes and pathogenesis of multikinase inhibitor (MKI)-induced skin lesions in an animal model.

METHODS

Tumor-bearing nude mice and BDF1 mice were treated with different doses (30-240 mg/kg, Bid) of sorafenib. The pathology and severity of the skin lesions was assessed and evaluated. The concentration of sorafenib in the skin was also determined.

RESULTS

Sorafenib transiently induced skin rash at high doses (120-240 mg/kg). The induced skin lesions had pathological manifestations resembling the observations in human patients. The skin of mice treated with sorafenib had significantly increased pathological scores and thickness of the stratum spinosum compared with the control, and induced more severe cutaneous lesions in nude mice than in BDF1 mice. The severity of skin lesions was correlated with the local concentration of sorafenib in the skin, which was significantly higher in nude mice than in BDF1 mice. Sorafenib treatment significantly increased the expression of F4-80, Ly6G, tumor growth factor (TGF)-1β, Smad2/3, α-smooth-muscle actin, and proliferating cell nuclear antigen.

CONCLUSIONS

The severity of skin lesions was positively correlated with the concentration of sorafenib in the skin. Our results suggested the involvement of the TGF-β1/Smads signaling pathway in the skin reaction induced by MKIs.

Falls and Physical Inactivity in Patients with Gastrointestinal Cancer and Hand-Foot Syndrome

Objective

This study aims to ascertain the incidence and association of falls and physical inactivity in patients with gastrointestinal cancer and hand-foot syndrome (HFS) after receiving chemotherapy or targeted therapy.

Methods

The present cross-sectional study was conducted on 50 outpatients with HFS of Grade 1 or above, according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, following the receipt of chemotherapy or targeted therapy for gastrointestinal cancer in Japan between November 2016 and February 2017. For measurement, Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire were used. Data were analyzed by logistic regression analysis.

Results

Of the participants, 18% experienced falls and 60% reported physical inactivity. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that the DLQI treatment domain score was the only factor associated with falls (odds ratio [OR] =8.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] =1.27-50.63, P = 0.027). Physical inactivity was associated with DLQI symptom and feeling domain scores (OR = 5.54, 95% CI = 1.26-24.33, P = 0.023) and the with-oxaliplatin or paclitaxel regimen (OR = 3.71, 95% CI = 1.06-13.03, P = 0.041).

Conclusions

The results of the present study suggest patients should be informed that HFS is a risk factor for physical inactivity and falls.