Pharmacokinetic Bioequivalence Studies of a Fixed-Dose Combination of Tamsulosin and Dutasteride in Healthy Volunteers

LC-MS/MS determination of dutasteride and its major metabolites in human plasma

Dutasteride is a specific and selective inhibitor of both 5α-reductase isoforms used mainly in benign prostatic hyperplasia and lower urinary tract symptoms. Although the drug is extensively metabolized in humans, data on the concentrations of its main metabolites are lacking. There is also a lack of data on dutasteride stability in frozen plasma samples. Our method was used to determine dutasteride and its active metabolites: 4'-hydroxydutasteride, 6β-hydroxydutasteride, and 1,2-dihydrodutasteride in plasma after a single administration of 0.5 mg of dutasteride. We also assessed the long-term stability (two years in the freezer) of dutasteride in clinical samples. The developed method covered the range of 0.1-3.5 ng/mL for dutasteride and 0.08-1.2 ng/mL for 1,2-dihydrodutasteride, 4'-hydroxydutasteride, 6β-hydroxydutasteride. It was proved to be reliable as it met all validation criteria required by the European Medicine Agency for bioanalytical methods. 4'-hydroxydutasteride and 1,2-dihydrodutasteride concentrations in plasma were higher than 6β-hydroxydutasteride. Dutasteride was stable in the freezer for up to 2 years in clinical samples. Thus within 1014 days of storage (below - 65 °C), samples can be reanalyzed without the risk of unreliable results.

Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modelling of tamsulosin related to CYP2D6*10 allele

Tamsulosin, a selective [Formula: see text]-adrenoceptor blocker, is commonly used for alleviation of lower urinary tract symptoms related to benign prostatic hyperplasia. Tamsulosin is predominantly metabolized by CYP3A4 and CYP2D6 enzymes, and several studies reported the effects of CYP2D6 genetic polymorphism on the pharmacokinetics of tamsulosin. This study aims to develop and validate the physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model of tamsulosin in CYP2D6*wt/*wt, CYP2D6*wt/*10, and CYP2D6*10/*10 genotypes, using Simcyp® simulator. Physicochemical, and formulation properties and data for absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion were collected from previous publications, predicted in the simulator, or optimized in different CYP2D6 genotypes. The tamsulosin PBPK model in CYP2D6*wt/*wt and CYP2D6*wt/*10 genotypes were developed based on the clinical pharmacokinetic study where a single oral dose of 0.2 mg tamsulosin was administered to 25 healthy Korean male volunteers with CYP2D6*wt/*wt and CYP2D6*wt/*10 genotypes. A previous pharmacokinetic study was used to develop the model in CYP2D6*10/*10 genotype. The developed model was validated using other clinical pharmacokinetic studies not used in development. The predicted exposures via the PBPK model in CYP2D6*wt/*10 and CYP2D6*10/*10 genotype was 1.23- and 1.76-fold higher than CYP2D6*wt/*wt genotype, respectively. The simulation profiles were visually similar to the observed profiles, and fold errors of all development and validation datasets were included within the criteria. Therefore, the tamsulosin PBPK model in different CYP2D6 genotypes with regards to CYP2D6*10 alleles was appropriately established. Our model can contribute to the implementation of personalized pharmacotherapy of patients, appropriately predicting the pharmacokinetics of tamsulosin reflecting their demographic and CYP2D6 genotype characteristics without unnecessary drug exposure.

Bioequivalence Assessment of an Oral Fixed-Dose Formulation of Dutasteride-Tamsulosin 0.5 mg/0.4 mg: A Randomized, Single-Blind, Single-Dose, 2-Period Crossover Study in Mexican Population Under Fasted Conditions

The aim of the present study was to compare the bioavailability and to demonstrate the bioequivalence between a dutasteride-tamsulosin 0.5 mg/0.4 mg capsule formulation and the regulatory reference drug (Combodart®, GlaxoSmithKline). A randomized, single-blind, single-dose, 2-way crossover study under fasting conditions, with at least a 28-day washout period was carried out in healthy volunteers. Plasma concentrations of drugs were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The pharmacokinetic analysis included maximum plasma concentration (C_max ), area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from time 0 to 72 hours, and AUC from baseline to infinity. The test formulation was considered bioequivalent if the geometric mean ratios (test/reference) were within the predetermined range of 80% to 125%. Safety and tolerability were evaluated by clinical assessment. The confidence intervals for the log-transformed test/reference ratios for dutasteride, C_max (95.4-109.2) and AUC from baseline to 72 hours (93.2-109.1), and for tamsulosin, C_max (101.9-119.8), AUC from baseline to the last quantifiable concentration (91.4-106.3) and AUC from baseline to infinity (90.9-103.3), were within the allowed limit specified by the regulatory authorities (80%-125%). In addition, both test and reference drugs were safe and tolerated. These results demonstrated the bioequivalence of test product (Dakart®) compared with Combodart®.

Meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of combination of tamsulosin plus dutasteride compared with tamsulosin monotherapy in treating benign prostatic hyperplasia

BACKGROUND

We performed a meta-analysis to confirm the efficacy and safety of the combination of tamsulosin plus dutasteride compared with tamsulosin monotherapy in treating benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) during a treatment cycle of at least 1 year.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials were searched by using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register. Systematic review was carried out using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses. The data was evaluated and statistically analyzed by using RevMan version 5.3.0.

RESULTS

Five studies including 4348 patients were studied. The analysis found that the combination group was significantly greater effect in international prostate symptom score (mean difference [MD], - 1.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], - 2.20 to - 0.66; P = 0.0003), prostate volume (MD, - 10.13; 95% CI, - 12.38 to - 7.88; P < 0.00001), transitional zone volume (MD, - 3.18; 95% CI, - 3.57 to - 2.79; P<0.0001), maximum urine flow rate (MD, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.82 to 1.29; P < 0.00001), prostate specific antigen (MD, - 0.54; 95% CI, - 0.80 to - 0.29; P < 0.0001) and post-void residual volume (MD, - 3.85; 95% CI, - 4.95 to - 2.76; P < 0.00001) compared with the tamsulosin group. In terms of safety, including adverse events (odds ratio [OR], 2.06; 95% CI, 1.34 to 3.17; P = 0.001), erectile dysfunction (OR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.73 to 2.92; P < 0.00001), ejaculation disorder (OR, 3.37; 95% CI, 1.97 to 5.79; P < 0.0001), retrograde ejaculation (OR, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.08 to 4.93; P = 0.03), decreased libido (OR, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.53 to 3.31; P < 0.0001) and loss of libido (OR, 3.38; 95% CI, 1.94 to 5.88; P<0.0001), the combination group showed poor tolerance than the tamsulosin group with the exception of dizziness (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.75 to 1.80; P = 0.50). The combination group significantly reduced the risk of clinical progression than the tamsulosin group especially in incidence of BPH-related symptom progression (OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.67; P < 0.00001) and acute urinary retention (OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.98; P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

The combination of tamsulosin plus dutasteride provides a preferable therapeutic effect for BPH with a higher incidence of sexual side effects, but combination-therapy can markedly reduce risk of BPH-related symptom progression and acute urinary retention relative to tamsulosin monotherapy.

Relative Bioavailability of Fixed-Dose Combinations of Tamsulosin and Dutasteride: Results From 2 Randomized Trials in Healthy Male Volunteers

The relative bioavailabilities of dutasteride/tamsulosin hydrochloride 0.5 mg/0.2 mg fixed-dose combination (FDC) capsules compared with coadministered reference products (1 dutasteride 0.5-mg capsule [Avodart^® ] + 1 tamsulosin hydrochloride 0.2-mg orally disintegrating tablet [Harnal D^® ]) were investigated in 2 clinical trials under fasted and fed conditions (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02184585 and NCT02509104). Both trials were open-label, randomized, single-dose, crossover studies in healthy male adults aged 18-65 years. Trial 1 evaluated 2 formulations (FDC1 and FDC2), and trial 2 evaluated a third formulation (FDC3). The primary end points were dutasteride area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to t (AUC_(0-t) ) and peak plasma concentration (C_max ) and tamsulosin AUC_(0-∞) , AUC_(0-t) , and C_max . The formulations were considered to be bioequivalent if the 90%CIs for the geometric mean ratios for each end point were within the range of 0.80-1.25. For FDC1 in trial 1, bioequivalence criteria were not met for dutasteride C_max or AUC in the fasted state or for tamsulosin C_max in the fasted or fed states. For FDC2 in trial 1, all bioequivalence criteria were met except for tamsulosin C_max in the fasted state. For FDC3 in trial 2, bioequivalence criteria were met for all dutasteride and tamsulosin end points in both the fed and fasted states. Safety profiles were similar for all FDC formulations and combination treatments.