Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Globalagliatin, a Glucokinase Activator, in Chinese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Randomized, Phase Ib, 28-day Ascending Dose Study

Modern-Day Therapeutics and Ongoing Clinical Trials against Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Narrative Review

OBJECTIVES

Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is a global health concern that affects millions of people globally. The present review aims to narrate the clinical guidelines and therapeutic interventions for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) patients. Furthermore, the present work summarizes the ongoing phase 1/2/3 and clinical trials against T2DM.

METHODS

A meticulous and comprehensive literature review was performed using various databases, such as PubMed, MEDLINE, Clinical trials database (https://clinicaltrials.gov/), and Google Scholar, to include various clinical trials and therapeutic interventions against T2DM.

RESULTS

Based on our findings, we concluded that most T2DM-associated clinical trials are interventional. Anti-diabetic therapeutics, including insulin, metformin, Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists (GLP-1RAs), and Sodium- Glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors are frontline therapeutics being clinically investigated. Currently, the therapeutics in phase IV clinical trials are mostly SGLT-2 inhibitors, implicating their critical contribution to the clinical management of T2DM.

CONCLUSION

Despite the success of T2DM treatments, a surge in innovative treatment options to reduce diabetic consequences and improve glycemic control is currently ongoing. More emphasis needs to be on exploring novel targeted drug candidates that can offer more sustained glycemic control.

Managing Post-Transplant Diabetes Mellitus after Kidney Transplantation: Challenges and Advances in Treatment

Kidney transplantation is the most effective treatment for end-stage renal failure but is associated with complications, including post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM). It affects the quality of life and survival of patients and the transplanted organ. It can cause complications, including infections and episodes of acute rejection, further threatening graft survival. The prevalence of PTDM, depending on the source, can range from 4 to 30% in transplant patients. This article aims to discuss issues related to diabetes in kidney transplant patients and the latest treatments. Knowledge of the mechanisms of action of immunosuppressive drugs used after transplantation and their effect on carbohydrate metabolism is key to the rapid and effective detection of PTDM. Patient therapy should not only include standard management such as lifestyle modification, insulin therapy or pharmacotherapy based on well-known oral and injection drugs. New opportunities are offered by hypoglycemic drugs still in clinical trials, including glucokinase activators, such as dorzagliatin, ADV-1002401, LY2608204, TMG-123, imeglimine, amycretin and pramlintide. Although many therapeutic options are currently available, PTDM often creates uncertainty about the most appropriate treatment strategy. Therefore, more research is needed to individualize therapeutic plans and monitor these patients.

Clinical investigation of glucokinase activators for the restoration of glucose homeostasis in diabetes

As a sensor, glucokinase (GK) controls glucose homeostasis, which progressively declines in patients with diabetes. GK maintains the equilibrium of glucose levels and regulates the homeostatic system set points. Endocrine and hepatic cells can both respond to glucose cooperatively when GK is activated. GK has been under study as a therapeutic target for decades due to the possibility that cellular GK expression and function can be recovered, hence restoring glucose homeostasis in patients with type 2 diabetes. Five therapeutic compounds targeting GK are being investigated globally at the moment. They all have distinctive molecular structures and have been clinically shown to have strong antihyperglycemia effects. The mechanics, classification, and clinical development of GK activators are illustrated in this review. With the recent approval and marketing of the first GK activator (GKA), dorzagliatin, GKA's critical role in treating glucose homeostasis disorder and its long-term benefits in diabetes will eventually become clear.

Should Glucokinase be Given a Chance in Diabetes Therapeutics? A Clinical-Pharmacological Review of Dorzagliatin and Lessons Learned So Far

Despite advances in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), one-third of patients with diabetes do not achieve the desired glycemic goal. Considering this inadequacy, many agents that activate glucokinase have been investigated over the last two decades but were withdrawn before submission for marketing permission. Dorzagliatin is the first glucokinase activator that has been granted approval for T2DM, only in China. As overstimulation of glucokinase is linked with pathophysiological disturbances such as fatty liver and cardiovascular issues and a loss of therapeutic efficacy with time. This review aims to highlight the benefits of glucokinase activators vis-à-vis the risks associated with chronic enzymatic activation. We discuss the multisystem disturbances expected with chronic activation of the enzyme, the lessons learned with glucokinase activators of the past, the major efficacy and safety findings with dorzagliatin and its pharmacological properties, and the status of other glucokinase activators in the pipeline. The approval of dorzagliatin in China was based on the SEED and the DAWN trials, the major pivotal phase III trials that enrolled patients with T2DM with a mean glycosylated hemoglobin of 8.3-8.4%, and a mean age of 53-54.5 years from multiple sites in China. Patients with uncontrolled diabetes, cardiac diseases, organ dysfunction, and a history of severe hypoglycemia were excluded. Both trials had a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled phase of 24 weeks followed by an open-label phase of 28 weeks with dorzagliatin. Drug-naïve patients with T2DM with a disease duration of 11.7 months were enrolled in the SEED trial while the DAWN trial involved patients with T2DM with a mean duration of 71.5 months and receiving background metformin therapy. Compared with placebo, the decline in glycosylated hemoglobin at 24 weeks was more with dorzagliatin with an estimated treatment difference of - 0.57% in the SEED trial and - 0.66% in the DAWN trial. The desired glycosylated hemoglobin (< 7%) was also attained at more than two times higher rates with dorzagliatin. The glycemic improvement was sustained in the SEED trial but decreased over 52 weeks in the DAWN trial. Hyperlipidemia was observed in 12-14% of patients taking dorzagliatin versus 9-11% of patients receiving a placebo. Additional adverse effects noticed over 52 weeks with dorzagliatin included an elevation in liver enzymes, hyperuricemia, hyperlacticacidemia, renal dysfunction, and cardiovascular disturbances. Considering the statistically significant improvement in glycosylated hemoglobin with dorzagliatin in patients with T2DM, the drug may be given a chance in treatment-naïve patients with a shorter disease history. However, with the waning therapeutic efficacy witnessed in patients with long-standing diabetes, which was also one of the potential concerns with previously tested molecules, extended studies involving patients with chronic and uncontrolled diabetes are needed to comment upon the long-term therapeutic performance of dorzagliatin. Likewise, evidence needs to be generated from other countries, patients with organ dysfunction, a history of severe hypoglycemia, cardiac diseases, and elderly patients before extending the use of dorzagliatin. Apart from monitoring lipid profiles, long-term safety studies of dorzagliatin should involve the assessment of serum uric acid, lactate, renal function, liver function, and cardiovascular parameters.

Unveiling the Influence of a High-Fat Meal on the Pharmacokinetics of Oral Globalagliatin, A Glucokinase Activator, in Healthy Chinese Volunteers

INTRODUCTION

Glucokinase (GK) plays a pivotal role in maintaining glucose homeostasis; globalagliatin, a newly developed drug, is a GK activator (GKA). This study constitutes a randomized, open-label, two-cycle, two-crossover, single-dose, phase I clinical trial conducted at a single center with healthy Chinese volunteers, aiming to examine the influence of a high-fat meal on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of orally administered globalagliatin.

METHODS

Twenty-four healthy volunteers were randomly divided into two groups, with a washout period of 16 days between the two cycles. The first cycle involved Group 1 volunteers who were orally administered globalagliatin 80 mg with 240 mL of water while fasting on Day 1. In contrast, Group 2 volunteers began oral administration of globalagliatin 80 mg with 240 mL of water, 30 min after consuming a high-fat meal (where high-fat content contributed to 54% of the total calories; the high-calorie meal amounted to 988.4 kcal). After the washout period, both groups of volunteers entered the second cycle of drug administration, with meals and medication being swapped on Day 17. Each volunteer collected blood samples at the following time points: 0 h (within 1 h before administration), and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, and 168 h after administration on both trial Day 1 and Day 17. The primary and secondary PK parameters were collected. The validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method was used to determine the concentration of globalagliatin in collected plasma samples, and the results were analyzed using Phoenix WinNonlin software. Safety evaluation was conducted by detecting or observing various adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs (SAEs).

RESULTS

All 24 healthy Chinese volunteers enrolled completed the study and underwent PK analysis. The maximum concentration (Cmax; ng/mL), area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from time zero to time of the last quantifiable concentration (AUCt; h·ng/mL), and AUC from time zero extrapolated to infinity (AUC∞; h·ng/mL) of fasting administration were 22.35 ± 7.02, 725.74 ± 303.04, and 774.07 ± 343.89, respectively, while the Cmax, AUCt, and AUC∞ administered after a high-fat meal were 28.95 ± 12.60, 964.84 ± 333.99, and 1031.28 ± 392.80, respectively. The geometric mean ratios of Cmax, AUCt, and AUC∞ for high-fat meal/fasting administration of globalagliatin were 124.81%, 135.24%, and 135.42%, respectively, with 90% confidence intervals of 109.97-141.65, 124.24-147.20, and 124.42-147.39, respectively. Compared with the fasting state, healthy volunteers who consumed a high-fat meal showed a 24.8% increase in Cmax, a 35.2% increase in AUCt, and a 35.4% increase in AUC∞. The geometric mean of Tmax was 4.69 h under fasting conditions and 5.93 h in a high-fat state, with a median of 4.98 h. Among the 24 enrolled volunteers, 9 cases (37.5%) had 11 AEs, and 6 cases (25.0%) had 7 adverse drug reactions (ADRs) after medication, all of which were cured or improved without taking any treatment measures. There were no SAEs in this study, no volunteers withdrew from the study due to AEs or ADRs, and no hypoglycemic events occurred during the trial.

CONCLUSION

A high-fat meal increased the Cmax, AUCt, and AUC∞ of globalagliatin compared with fasting conditions in healthy Chinese adult volunteers. Meanwhile, globalagliatin showed favorable safety and tolerability under fasting or high-fat meal conditions.

Targeting human Glucokinase for the treatment of type 2 diabetes: an overview of allosteric Glucokinase activators

Diabetes mellitus is a worldwide impacting disorder and the ratio through which the number of diabetic patients had increased worldwide, puts medical professionals to serious stress for its effective management. Due to its polygenic origin and involvement of multiple genes to its pathophysiology, leads to understanding of this ailment more complex. It seems that current interventions, such as dietary changes, life style changes and drug therapy such as oral hypoglycaemics and insulin, are unable to halt the trend. There are various novel and emerging targets on which the researchers are paying attention to combat with this ailment successfully. Human glucokinase (GK) enzyme is one of these novel and emerging targets for management of diabetes. Its availability in the pancreas and liver cells makes this target more lucrative. GK's presence in the pancreatic and hepatic cells plays a very important function for the management of glucose homoeostasis. Small molecules that activate GK allosterically provide an alternative strategy for restoring/improving glycaemic regulation, especially in type 2 diabetic patients. Although after enduring many setbacks in the development of the GK activators, interest has been renewed especially due to introduction of novel dual acting GK activator dorzagliatin, and a novel hepato-selective GK activator, TTP399. This review article has been formulated to discuss importance of GK in glucose homeostasis, recent updates on small molecules of GK activators, clinical status of GK activators and challenges in development of GK activators.

Dorzagliatin in drug-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial

Improving glucose sensitivity remains an unmet medical need in treating type 2 diabetes (T2D). Dorzagliatin is a dual-acting, orally bioavailable glucokinase activator that enhances glucokinase activity in a glucose-dependent manner, improves glucose-stimulated insulin secretion and demonstrates effects on glycemic control in patients with T2D. We report the findings of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dorzagliatin in patients with T2D. Eligible drug-naïve patients with T2D (n = 463) were randomly assigned to the dorzagliatin or placebo group at a ratio of 2:1 for 24 weeks of double-blind treatment, followed by 28 weeks of open-label treatment with dorzagliatin for all patients. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in glycated hemoglobin from baseline to week 24. Safety was assessed throughout the trial. At week 24, the least-squares mean change in glycated hemoglobin from baseline (95% confidence interval) was -1.07% (-1.19%, -0.95%) in the dorzagliatin group and -0.50% (-0.68%, -0.32%) in the placebo group (estimated treatment difference, -0.57%; 95% confidence interval: -0.79%, -0.36%; P < 0.001). The incidence of adverse events was similar between the two groups. There were no severe hypoglycemia events or drug-related serious adverse events in the dorzagliatin group. In summary, dorzagliatin improved glycemic control in drug-naïve patients with T2D and showed a good tolerability and safety profile.

Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of the glucokinase activator PB-201 and its effects on the glucose excursion profile in drug-naïve Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomised controlled, crossover, single-centre phase 1 trial

BACKGROUND

PB-201, a partial, pancreas/liver-dual glucokinase activator, showed good tolerance and glycaemic effects in multinational studies. This study determined its optimal dose, safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

In this double-blind, randomised, four-period, crossover, phase 1 trial in China, conducted at the Peking University Third Hospital, adult patients with drug-naive type 2 diabetes were randomised (1:1:1:1) to four sequence groups using a computer-generated randomisation table. In each period, they received oral placebo or PB-201 (50+50, 100+50, or 100+100 mg split doses) for 7 days. Investigators and patients were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoints were safety and pharmacokinetics. Continuous glucose monitoring was used to delineate the glucose excursion profile. Trial registration number: NCT03973515.

FINDINGS

Between August 27, 2019 and December 19, 2019, 16 patients were randomised. PB-201 showed a dose-proportional pharmacokinetic profile without apparent accumulation in the body and induced dose-dependent lowering of blood glucose. PB-201 at 50+50, 100+50, and 100+100 mg increased mean time in range (49·210% [standard deviation 27], 56·130% [25], and 63·330% [20] with three doses, respectively) versus placebo (49·380% [27]) and reduced estimated glycated haemoglobin from baseline (-0·5445% [1·654], -1·063% [1·236], and -1·888% [1·381] vs -0·581% [1·200]). Fifteen patients (93·8%) had treatment-emergent adverse events, which were mild. No patients had hypoglycaemia with venous/capillary glucose <3·9 mmol/L or nocturnal hypoglycaemia.

INTERPRETATION

PB-201 100 mg twice daily is identified as the optimal dose, which shows promising glucose-lowering effects and low risks of hypoglycaemia and other side effects. Further investigation of PB-201 100 mg twice daily in confirmatory trials is warranted.

FUNDING

PegBio.

The efficacy and safety of glucokinase activators for the treatment of type-2 diabetes mellitus: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Glucokinase activators (GKAs) are a novel family of glucose-lowering agents used for the treatment of type-2 diabetes mellitus. Treatment with different GKAs has been shown to reduce blood glucose levels in these patients. We compared the efficacy/safety of GKAs in patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus through a meta-analysis.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed, Excerpt Medica Database, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases for articles published before December 30, 2020. We computed the weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for the change from baseline to the study endpoint for GKA versus placebo treatments.

RESULTS

A total of 4 articles (5 studies) were included in the meta-analysis. GKAs were associated with reductions in glycated hemoglobin levels from baseline (WMD, -0.3%; 95% CI, -0.466% to -0.134%). No significant difference between GKA and placebo treatment was observed in the results of fasting plasma glucose levels from baseline (WMD 0.013 mmol/L; 95% CI, -0.304-0.33 mmol/L). A significantly higher change in 2-hour postprandial plasma glucose (2-h PPG) levels (WMD -2.434 mmol/L; 95% CI, -3.304 to -1.564 mmol/L) was observed following GKA than placebo treatment. GKAs were associated with a higher prevalence of causing hypoglycemic events than placebo treatment (risk difference [RD], 0.06; 95% CI 0.013-0.106). GKAs had no association with the risk of developing adverse effects (RD, 0.038; 95% CI, -0.03-0.106) and serious adverse events (RD, 0.01; 95% CI, -0.004-0.023).

CONCLUSIONS

GKAs were more effective for postprandial blood glucose control. However, these agents showed a significantly high risk of causing hypoglycemia.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42021220364.