Use of Azithromycin in Pregnancy: More Doubts than Certainties

Can the use of azithromycin during labour reduce the incidence of infection among puerperae and newborns? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated whether the use of azithromycin during labour or caesarean section reduces the incidence of sepsis and infection among mothers and newborns.

DATA SOURCES

We independently searched the PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and EMBASE databases for relevant studies published before February, 2024.

METHODS

We included RCTs that evaluated the effect of prenatal oral or intravenous azithromycin or placebo on intrapartum or postpartum infection incidence. We included studies evaluating women who had vaginal births as well as caesarean sections. Studies reporting maternal and neonatal infections were included in the current analysis. Review Manager 5.4 was used to analyse 6 randomized clinical trials involving 44,448 mothers and 44,820 newborns. The risk of bias of each included study was assessed using the criteria outlined in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.Primary outcomes included the incidence of maternal sepsis and all-cause mortality and neonatal sepsis and all-cause mortality; secondary outcomes included maternal (endometritis, wound and surgical site infections, chorioamnionitis, and urinary tract infections) and neonatal outcomes (infections of the eyes, ears and skin). A random-effects model was used to test for overall effects and heterogeneity.

RESULTS

The pooled odds ratios (ORs) were as follows: 0.65 for maternal sepsis (95% CI, 0.55-0.77; I2, 0%; P < .00001); 0.62 for endometritis (95% CI, 0.52-0.74; I2, 2%; P < .00001); and 0.43 for maternal wound or surgical site infection (95% CI, 0.24-0.78; P < .005); however, there was great heterogeneity among the studies (I2, 75%). The pooled OR for pyelonephritis and urinary tract infections was 0.3 (95% CI, 0.17-0.52; I2, 0%; P < .0001), and that for neonatal skin infections was 0.48 (95% CI, 0.35-0.65; I2, 0%, P < .00001). There was no significant difference in maternal all-cause mortality or incidence of chorioamnionitis between the two groups. No significant differences were observed in the incidence of neonatal sepsis or suspected sepsis, all-cause mortality, or infections of the eyes or ears.

CONCLUSION

In this meta-analysis, azithromycin use during labour reduced the incidence of maternal sepsis, endometritis, incisional infections and urinary tract infections but did not reduce the incidence of neonatal-associated infections, except for neonatal skin infections. These findings indicate that azithromycin may be potentially beneficial for maternal postpartum infections, but its effect on neonatal prognosis remains unclear. Azithromycin should be used antenatally only if the clinical indication is clear and the potential benefits outweigh the harms.

Antibiotic use during pregnancy in Sweden: A nationwide utilization study covering 2007-2019

INTRODUCTION

Antibiotics are often prescribed during pregnancy. Assessing the current state of prenatal antibiotic use is therefore imperative for optimizing prescribing and identifying emerging research priorities. The study aimed to describe recent trends and patterns in antibiotic use during pregnancy among women who gave birth in Sweden, including user characteristics.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Population-based descriptive study using linked nationwide registers. All pregnancies delivered in Sweden from 2007 to 2019 were included. Prevalence of use was defined as the percentage of pregnancies during which at least one prescription forantibiotics was filled. Temporal trends in the prevalence of antibiotic use by calendar year, trimester and weeks of gestation were assessed from time series graphs.

RESULTS

Prescriptions for systemic antibiotics were filled in 20.7% of 1 434 431 pregnancies overall, decreasing from 24.7% in 2007 to 18.0% in 2019. Phenoxymethylpenicillin (8.5%), pivmecillinam (6.5%), nitrofurantoin (4.7%), amoxicillin (1.6%) and cefadroxil (1.5%) use were the most prevalent. Their use decreased over the 13-year period, except for pivmecillinam, which increased from 4.0% to 7.4%. Prevalence of use was highest in the second trimester (9.5%), with weekly trends peaking at 13 and 34 weeks of gestation. Compared with non-users, antibiotic users more often belonged to the youngest and oldest age strata, carried multipleton pregnancies, had delivered before, had attained a lower education level and smoked in early pregnancy. A higher body mass index, asthma, chronic renal disease and diabetes mellitus were more prevalent among antibiotic users than among non-users.

CONCLUSIONS

Although outpatient antibiotic use during pregnancy in Sweden has been declining, one in five pregnancies was exposed to systemic antibiotics.

The molecular mechanisms in prenatal drug exposure-induced fetal programmed adult cardiovascular disease

The "developmental origins of health and disease" (DOHaD) hypothesis posits that early-life environmental exposures have a lasting impact on individual's health and permanently shape growth, structure, and metabolism. This reprogramming, which results from fetal stress, is believed to contribute to the development of adulthood cardiovascular diseases such as hypertension, coronary artery disease, heart failure, and increased susceptibility to ischemic injuries. Recent studies have shown that prenatal exposure to drugs, such as glucocorticoids, antibiotics, antidepressants, antiepileptics, and other toxins, increases the risk of adult-onset cardiovascular diseases. In addition, observational and animal experimental studies have demonstrated the association between prenatal drug exposure and the programming of cardiovascular disease in the offspring. The molecular mechanisms underlying these effects are still being explored but are thought to involve metabolism dysregulation. This review summarizes the current evidence on the relationship between prenatal drug exposure and the risk of adult cardiovascular disorders. Additionally, we present the latest insights into the molecular mechanisms that lead to programmed cardiovascular phenotypes after prenatal drug exposure.