Development of Population and Bayesian Models for Applied Use in Patients Receiving Cefepime

Dose optimization of β-lactam antibiotics in children: from population pharmacokinetics to individualized therapy

INTRODUCTION

β-Lactams are the most widely used antibiotics in children. Their optimal dosing is essential to maximize their efficacy, while minimizing the risk for toxicity and the further emergence of antimicrobial resistance. However, most β-lactams were developed and licensed long before regulatory changes mandated pharmacokinetic studies in children. As a result, pediatric dosing practices are poorly harmonized and off-label use remains common today.

AREAS COVERED

β-Lactam pharmacokinetics and dose optimization strategies in pediatrics, including fixed dose regimens, therapeutic drug monitoring, and model-informed precision dosing are reviewed.

EXPERT OPINION/COMMENTARY

Standard pediatric doses can result in subtherapeutic exposure and non-target attainment for specific patient subpopulations (neonates, critically ill children, e.g.). Such patients could benefit greatly from more individualized approaches to dose optimization, beyond a relatively simple dose adaptation based on weight, age, or renal function. In this context, Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM) and Model-Informed Precision Dosing (MIPD) emerge as particularly promising avenues. Obstacles to their implementation include the lack of strong evidence of clinical benefit due to the paucity of randomized clinical trials, of standardized assays for monitoring concentrations, or of adequate markers for renal function. The development of precision medicine tools is urgently needed to individualize therapy in vulnerable pediatric subpopulations.

Population pharmacokinetic model of cefepime for critically ill adults: a comparative assessment of eGFR equations

Cefepime exhibits highly variable pharmacokinetics in critically ill patients. The purpose of this study was to develop and qualify a population pharmacokinetic model for use in the critically ill and investigate the impact of various estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) equations using creatinine, cystatin C, or both on model parameters. This was a prospective study of critically ill adults hospitalized at an academic medical center treated with intravenous cefepime. Individuals with acute kidney injury or on kidney replacement therapy or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation were excluded. A nonlinear mixed-effects population pharmacokinetic model was developed using data collected from 2018 to 2022. The 120 included individuals contributed 379 serum samples for analysis. A two-compartment pharmacokinetic model with first-order elimination best described the data. The population mean parameters (standard error) in the final model were 7.84 (0.24) L/h for CL1 and 15.6 (1.45) L for V1. Q was fixed at 7.09 L/h and V2 was fixed at 10.6 L, due to low observed interindividual variation in these parameters. The final model included weight as a covariate for volume of distribution and the eGFRcr-cysC (mL/min) as a predictor of drug clearance. In summary, a population pharmacokinetic model for cefepime was created for critically ill adults. The study demonstrated the importance of cystatin C to prediction of cefepime clearance. Cefepime dosing models which use an eGFR equation inclusive of cystatin C are likely to exhibit improved accuracy and precision compared to dosing models which incorporate an eGFR equation with only creatinine.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Loop Diuretics on Antibiotic Pharmacokinetics

Loop diuretics and antibiotics are commonly co-prescribed across many clinical care settings. Loop diuretics may alter antibiotic pharmacokinetics (PK) via several potential drug interactions. A systematic review of the literature was performed to investigate the impact of loop diuretics on antibiotic PK. The primary outcome metric was the ratio of means (ROM) of antibiotic PK parameters such as area under the curve (AUC) and volume of distribution (V_d) on and off loop diuretics. Twelve crossover studies were amenable for metanalysis. Coadministration of diuretics was associated with a mean 17% increase in plasma antibiotic AUC (ROM 1.17, 95% CI 1.09-1.25, I² = 0%) and a mean decrease in antibiotic V_d by 11% (ROM 0.89, 95% CI 0.81-0.97, I² = 0%). However, the half-life was not significantly different (ROM 1.06, 95% CI 0.99-1.13, I² = 26%). The remaining 13 observational and population PK studies were heterogeneous in design and population, as well as prone to bias. No large trends were collectively observed in these studies. There is currently not enough evidence to support antibiotic dosing changes based on the presence or absence of loop diuretics alone. Further studies designed and powered to detect the effect of loop diuretics on antibiotic PK are warranted in applicable patient populations.

Cefepime, not Piperacillin/Tazobactam use, for empirical treatment of bloodstream infections caused by Enterobacter spp.: Results from a population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis

OBJECTIVE

There is a paucity of published data to evaluate the efficacy and safety of imipenem, cefepime and piperacillin/tazobactam dosing regimens against bloodstream infections caused by Klebsiella aerogenes (BSIs-Kae) and Enterobacter cloacae complex (BSIs-Ecc) in patients with various degrees of renal function.

METHODS

Pathogens were isolated from China's blood bacterial resistant investigation network. The dosing regimens of imipenem, cefepime and piperacillin were simulated with intermittent infusion and extended infusion. Monte Carlo simulation was performed to calculate the probability of target attainment and a cumulative fraction of response (CFR) against BSIs-Kae/Ecc.

RESULTS

In total, 203 BSIs-Kae, and 785 BSIs-Ecc were isolated from the surveillance network. Imipenem showed the highest in vitro activity against BSIs-Kae/Ecc, followed by cefepime (85%) and piperacillin/tazobactam (70-80%). The MIC₉₀ values of imipenem, cefepime and piperacillin/tazobactam aginst BSIs-Kae and BSIs-Ecc were 1/1 mg/L, 16/16 mg/L, and 64/128 mg/L, respectively. The simulation results showed imipenem achieved the highest CFRs in patients with normal or decreased renal function, with values of 91-99%, followed by FEP (88-96%), without risk of excessive dosing. However, the intermittent and extended dosing regimens of piperacillin/tazobactam were unlikely to provide adequate exposure for empirical management of BSIs-Kae/Ecc (CFRs, 50-80%), regardless of renal function. Besides, the traditional intermittent piperacillin/tazobactam dosing regimens were highly likely to contribute to suboptimal therapeutic exposure when MIC was close to clinical breakpoints.

CONCLUSIONS

Cefepime, not piperacillin/tazobactam, can be a reasonable carbapenem-sparing option in empirically treating BSIs-Kae/Ecc.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Cefepime

Cefepime is a broad-spectrum fourth-generation cephalosporin with activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens. It is generally administered as an infusion over 30-60 min or as a prolonged infusion with infusion times from 3 h to continuous administration. Cefepime is widely distributed in biological fluids and tissues with an average volume of distribution of ~ 0.2 L/kg in healthy adults with normal renal function. Protein binding is relatively low (20%), and elimination is mainly renal. About 85% of the dose is excreted unchanged in the urine, with an elimination half-life of 2-2.3 h. The pharmacokinetics of cefepime is altered under certain pathophysiological conditions, resulting in high inter-individual variability in cefepime volume of distribution and clearance, which poses challenges for population dosing approaches. Consequently, therapeutic drug monitoring of cefepime may be beneficial in certain patients including those who are critically ill, have life-threatening infections, or are infected with more resistant pathogens. Cefepime is generally safe and efficacious, with a goal exposure target of 70% time of the free drug concentration over the minimum inhibitory concentration for clinical efficacy. In recent years, reports of neurotoxicity have increased, specifically in patients with impaired renal function. This review summarizes the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and toxicodynamics of cefepime contemporarily in the setting of increasing cefepime exposures. We explore the potential benefits of extended or continuous infusions and therapeutic drug monitoring in special populations.

Cefepime population pharmacokinetics and dosing regimen optimization in critically ill children with different renal function

OBJECTIVE

Cefepime is commonly used in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs), where unpredictable variations in the patients' pharmacokinetic (PK) variables may require drug dose adjustments. The objectives of the present study were to build a population PK model for cefepime in critically ill children and to optimize individual initial dosing regimens.

METHODS

Children (aged from 1 month to 18 years; bodyweight >3 kg) receiving cefepime were included. Cefepime total plasma concentrations were measured using high performance liquid chromatography. Data were modelled using non-linear, mixed-effect modeling software, and Monte Carlo simulations were performed with a PK target of 100% fT _{> MIC}.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine patients (median (range) age: 13.5 months (1.1 month-17.6 years)) and 129 cefepime concentration measurements were included. The cefepime concentration data were best fitted by a one-compartment model. The selected covariates were body weight with allometric scaling and estimated glomerular filtration rate on clearance. Mean population values for clearance and volume were 1.21 L.h^-1 and 4.8 L, respectively. According to the simulations, a regimen of 100 mg.kg^-1.day^-1 q12 h over 30 min or 100 mg.kg^-1.day^-1 as a continuous infusion was more likely to achieve the PK target in patients with renal failure and in patients with normal or augmented renal clearance, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Appropriate cefepime dosing regimens should take renal function into account. Continuous infusions are required in critically ill children with normal or augmented renal clearance, while intermittent infusions are adequate for children with acute renal failure. Close therapeutic drug monitoring is mandatory, given cefepime's narrow therapeutic window.

Estimation of cefepime, piperacillin, and tazobactam clearance with iohexol-based glomerular filtration rate in paediatric patients

PURPOSE

Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) equations reflect kidney function imprecisely. We aimed to describe whether iohexol-based GFR or eGFRs predict clearance of cefepime, piperacillin, and tazobactam in pharmacokinetic (PK) models in this population and its clinical significance.

METHODS

Hospitalized patients (0.5-25 years) with haemato-oncological disease and infection receiving cefepime or piperacillin/tazobactam were included. PK samples were collected at a steady state concomitantly with samples for iohexol-based GFR. PK models were developed in NONMEM. Weight, postmenstrual age, iohexol-based GFR, different eGFR equations (Schwartz updated, Lund-Malmö revised, CKD-EPI, Bouvet, Schwartz cystatin C-based) were tested as covariates. Probabilities of neurotoxic/therapeutic concentrations were assessed by simulations.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients receiving cefepime and 17 piperacillin/tazobactam were included (median (range) age 16.2 (1.9-26.0) and 10.5 (0.8-25.6) years, iohexol-based GFR 102 (68-140) and 116 (74-137) mL/min/1.73 m², respectively). Two-compartment model provided the best fit for all drugs. Weight was covariate for central and peripheral compartment, clearance and intercompartmental clearance (only tazobactam), and postmenstrual age for clearance (excluding cefepime). Iohexol-based GFR was the best predictor of clearance. The model of cefepime without vs with iohexol-based GFR underestimated the probability of neurotoxic concentrations (28.3-28.6% vs 52.1-69.3%) and overestimated the probability of therapeutic concentrations (> 90% vs 81.9-87.1%) in the case of iohexol-based GFR 70-80 and 130-140 mL/min/1.73 m², respectively.

CONCLUSION

Iohexol-based GFR can predict better than eGFRs the clearance of cefepime, piperacillin, and tazobactam in children and young adults with haemato-oncological disease and infection, warranting further investigation as an indicator of renal function to improve targeting of therapeutic window.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER AND DATE OF REGISTRATION

EudraCT 2015-000,631-32, EudraCT 2016-003,374-40 (24.10.2016).

Cefepime precision dosing tool: From Standard to Precise Dose Using Nonparametric Population Pharmacokinetics

Cefepime is the second most common cephalosporin used in U.S. hospitals. We aim to develop and validate cefepime population pharmacokinetic (PK) model and integrate into precision dosing tool for implementation. Two datasets (680 patients) were used to build cefepime PK model in Pmetrics, and three datasets (34 patients) were used for the validation. A separate application dataset (115 patients) was used for the implementation and validation of a precision dosing tool. The model support points and covariates were used to generate the optimal initial dose (OID). Cefepime PK was described by a two-compartment model including weight and creatinine clearance (CrCl) as covariates. The median rate of elimination was 0.30 hr^-1 (adults) and 0.96 hr^-1 (pediatrics), central volume of distribution 13.85 L, and rate of transfer from the central to the peripheral compartments 1.22 hr^-1 and from the peripheral to the central compartments 1.38 hr^-1. After integration in BestDose, the observed vs. predicted cefepime concentration fit using the application dataset was excellent (R²>0.98) and the median difference between observed and what BestDose predicted in a second occasion was 4%. For OID, cefepime 0.5-1g 4-hour infusion q8-24hr with CrCl<70 mL/min was needed to achieve a target range of free trough:MIC 1-4 at MIC 8 mg/L, while continuous infusion was needed for higher CrCl and weight values. In conclusion, we developed and validated a cefepime model for clinical application. The model was integrated in a precision dosing tool for implementation and the median concentration prediction bias was 4%. OID algorithm was provided.

Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Dosage Individualization of Cefepime in Critically Ill Patients: A Case Study

OBJECTIVE

The authors report on a case of a 59-year-old man hospitalized in the intensive care unit because of severe SARS-COV-2 infection (COVID-19).

BACKGROUND

The patient had several comorbidities, including liver cirrhosis. He developed ventilation-associated bacterial pneumonia for which he was administered cefepime at an initial dose of 2 g/8 hours. Therapeutic drug monitoring was performed, showing overexposure with an initial trough concentration of >60 mg/L.

METHODS

Analysis of pharmacokinetic data and model-based dose adjustment was performed using BestDose software.

RESULTS

The patient had unexpected pharmacokinetic parameter values. Serum creatinine was only moderately increased, whereas measured creatinine clearance based on urine collection showed impaired renal function. Bacterial minimum inhibitory concentration was also considered in the dosing decisions. After dose reduction to 0.5 g/8 hours, the cefepime trough concentration progressively declined and reached the target values by the end of the therapy. A post-hoc analysis provided a different interpretation of drug overexposure.

CONCLUSION

This case report illustrates how physiological, microbiological, and drug concentration data can be used for model-based dosage individualization of cefepime in intensive care unit patients.

β-lactam dosing strategies: Think before you push

OBJECTIVES

There has been interest in administering cefepime, a β-lactam antibiotic, via intravenous push (IVP) as a means to improve time to first-dose antibiotic and reduce cost; however, the downstream impacts on antibiotic exposure and pharmacodynamic efficacy need to be further evaluated.

METHODS

This study used a population pharmacokinetic model for cefepime and simulated exposures to predict the pharmacodynamic (PD) effect for cefepime regimens administered via IVP or 30-minute intermittent infusion in adults with different renal functions. FDA-approved adult dosages of 1-2 g every 8 or 12 hours were compared. This study aimed to compare the absolute difference in pharmacodynamic probability of target attainment (PTA) between IVP and intermittent infusion, defined as free cefepime concentrations above organism MIC for ≥ 70% of the time.

RESULTS

At MICs of 0.25-0.5 mg/L, absolute differences in PTA were observed, with a reduction as great as 2.3% (89% to 86.7% for 30-minute intermittent infusion and IVP, respectively). At MICs of 1-4 mg/L, 30-minute intermittent infusion and IVP exhibited PTA differences as great as 5.4%, from 89.4% to 84%, respectively. At MICs of ≥8 mg/L, similar absolute differences existed; however, no regimen achieved a PTA >70%. Across renal function strata of 60, 100 and 140 mL/minute (within the same dosing group and MICs), better renal function lowered PTAs.

CONCLUSIONS

Simulations demonstrated that IVP cefepime resulted in lower PTAs than traditional intermittent infusion among a subset of elevated MICs. Clinicians should exercise caution in IVP strategy, as unintended clinical consequences are possible.

Population Pharmacokinetics and Target Attainment of Cefepime in Critically Ill Patients and Guidance for Initial Dosing

Cefepime is commonly used in the intensive care unit (ICU) to treat bacterial infections. The time during which the free cefepime concentration is above the MIC (fT_>MIC) should be optimized to increase the efficacy of the regimen. We aim to optimize the exposure of cefepime in ICU patients by using population pharmacokinetic (PK) modeling and simulations. Two data sets were included in this study. The first was a prospective study of pediatric patients who received cefepime at 50 mg/kg of body weight and had extensive PK sampling. The second study comprised retrospective data for adult ICU patients admitted to UF Health Shands Hospital who received cefepime and had their cefepime concentrations measured. The population PK model was developed, and simulations were performed, using Pmetrics. The target exposures were 100% fT_>MIC and 100% fT_>4×MIC The studies included a total of 266 patients, and the mean ages were 3.9 years in the pediatric group and 55 years in adult group. More than half of the patients were males. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) creatinine clearance (CrCl) was 125 (93) ml/min. The mean (SD) daily dose for adults was 4.9 (1.6) g. Cefepime was well described by a two-compartment model with weight as a covariate on the volume of distribution and elimination rate constant (k _el), and CrCl and age group as covariates on k _el At a MIC of 8 mg/liter, a cefepime loading dose of 4 g as an extended infusion followed by a 6-g continuous infusion was needed for good target attainment. In conclusion, prolonged or continuous infusions will be needed to achieve optimal cefepime exposure for ICU patients. Given the observed variability, therapeutic drug monitoring can help individualize therapy.