The Evolution of Lung Transplant Immunosuppression

Management of pharmacotherapy in lung transplant candidates

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Lung transplantation is a common treatment for end-stage lung disease (ESLD). Patients present to lung transplantation evaluation on various medications that could impact their candidacy and posttransplant course. In this review, we will discuss pretransplant optimization of pharmacotherapy to minimize complications while waiting for transplant and increase posttransplant success. We will also discuss important considerations for posttransplant immunosuppression, antimicrobial prophylaxis, and complex drug interactions.

RECENT FINDINGS

Prior to lung transplantation, several medications should be optimized to promote posttransplant success including minimization of corticosteroids, opioids, and benzodiazepines. Lung transplantation candidates should be up to date on vaccinations. Most medications for ESLD are well tolerated to continue up until the point of transplant including antifibrotics, CFTR modulators, and pulmonary vasodilators. Mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors and other immunosuppressants may need to be stopped or minimized before lung transplantation to minimize posttransplant infection and would healing complications. Medications that increase risk of posttransplant bleeding, thrombosis, or aspiration should be stopped prior to listing.

SUMMARY

In this article, we discuss management of pharmacotherapy for lung transplantation candidates to minimize posttransplant complications. Changes in medications for ESLD should be done cautiously to prevent worsening of native disease while waiting for lung transplantation.

Key predictors of long-term survival after lung transplantation in Japan

BACKGROUND

Lung transplantation (LTx) is essential for treating end-stage lung diseases in Japan, achieving favorable long-term survival despite donor shortages. However, factors associated with long-term survival after transplantation remain unclear. This study aims to identify key predictors influencing post-transplant outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on LTx recipients at Tohoku University Hospital from 2000 to 2019, with a follow-up period of five years to 2024. Recipients were categorized into short survivors (<5 years) and long survivors (≥5 years). The analysis focused on recipient demographics, donor characteristics, surgical factors, and post-transplant outcomes.

RESULTS

Of 124 recipients, 36 were short survivors, and 88 were long survivors. Long-term survivors were younger, with a lower prevalence of patients aged 55 years and older. Additionally, fewer long-term survivors received lungs from critically marginal donors compared to short-term survivors. CMV serology was a significant factor, with a higher incidence of CMV disease observed in short-term survivors.

CONCLUSION

The study identified younger age, selective donor use, and CMV status as key predictors associated with long-term survival after LTx in Japan. The findings underscore the importance of targeted CMV management strategies and suggest that future multicenter studies with larger, more diverse populations are needed to confirm these results and further enhance long-term survival outcomes.

Unveiling the potential of lung transplantation for situs inversus

INTRODUCTION

Situs inversus is a rare congenital condition where the organs in the chest and abdomen are reversed, thus complicating surgeries such as lung transplantation. Kartagener syndrome (KS), associated with situs inversus, includes chronic sinusitis and bronchiectasis, which can progress to end-stage lung disease requiring transplantation. This review discusses the unique surgical considerations, technical challenges, and outcomes of lung transplantation in patients with situs inversus, particularly KS.

AREAS COVERED

The review highlights anatomical and physiological challenges in lung transplantation due to reversed organ positioning, requiring customized surgical approaches and intraoperative modifications. Preoperative imaging, anesthesia adjustments, and tailored surgical techniques are crucial for successful transplantation. Postoperative care focuses on managing complications such as primary graft dysfunction, infections, and anastomotic issues. Literature on survival rates, chronic lung allograft dysfunction, and quality of life is analyzed, indicating outcomes comparable to other lung transplant recipients.

EXPERT OPINION

Despite significant challenges, lung transplantation in patients with situs inversus and KS is feasible with outcomes similar to traditional cases. Advances in imaging, surgical planning, and minimally invasive techniques offer promise for improved outcomes. Ongoing research, collaboration, and ethical considerations are essential to optimizing care and expand treatment possibilities for this high-risk patient population.

Gram-negative bacterial colonizations before bilateral lung transplant. The impact of 'targeted' versus 'standard' surgical prophylaxis

BACKGROUND

Infections are one of the most common causes of death after lung transplant (LT). However, the benefit of 'targeted' prophylaxis in LT recipients pre-colonized by Gram-negative (GN) bacteria is still unclear.

METHODS

All consecutive bilateral LT recipients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit of the University Hospital of Padua (February 2016-2023) were retrospectively screened. Only patients with pre-existing GN bacterial isolations were enrolled and analyzed according to the antimicrobial surgical prophylaxis ('standard' vs. 'targeted' on the preoperative bacterial isolation).

RESULTS

One hundred eighty-one LT recipients were screened, 46 enrolled. Twenty-two (48%) recipients were exposed to 'targeted' prophylaxis, while 24 (52%) to 'standard' prophylaxis. Overall prevalence of postoperative multi-drug resistant (MDR) GN bacteria isolation was 65%, with no differences between the two surgical prophylaxis (p = 0.364). Eleven (79%) patients treated with 'standard' prophylaxis and twelve (75%) with 'targeted' therapy reconfirmed the preoperative GN pathogen (p = 0.999). The prevalence of postoperative infections due to MDR GN bacteria was 50%. Of these recipients, 4 belonged to the 'standard' and 11 to the 'targeted' prophylaxis (p = 0.027).

CONCLUSIONS

The administration of a 'targeted' prophylaxis in LT pre-colonized recipients seemed not to prevent the occurrence of postoperative MDR GN infections.

Readmissions and costs in cadaveric and living-donor lobar lung transplantation: Analysis using a national database

Living-donor lobar lung transplantation (LDLLT) is a well-established surgical procedure with favorable outcomes; however, the frequency of readmission and costs in LDLLT are poorly understood. Here, we aimed to compare health care costs and readmissions at 90 days and 1 year after the index discharge in LDLLT and cadaveric lung transplantation (CLT) and evaluate the reasons for readmission and in-hospital mortality. In this retrospective cohort study, we used the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database, a nationwide inpatient database in Japan to obtain initial lung transplantation data for all patients from July 2010 to March 2020. Multivariable Poisson or multiple regression analyses after multiple imputation was performed to compare the cumulative number of readmissions and costs between patients receiving LDLLT and CLT. Among 514 recipients, 115 (22%) underwent LDLLT and 399 (78%) received CLT. Overall, in-hospital mortality after transplantation was 4.5%. The LDLLT group showed a significantly lower crude readmission rate (90 days, 22% vs 37%, p = 0.004; 1 year, 48% vs 62%, p = 0.031) and median readmission cost (90 days, United States dollar (USD) 0 vs 0, p = 0.003; 1 year, USD 1178 vs 4714, p = 0.005) than the CLT group. Multivariable regression analyses showed that the LDLLT group had a lower risk of readmission (incidence rate ratio, 0.59; 95% confidence interval, 0.38-0.92; p = 0.020) and lower costs at 90 days (difference, USD -11,629; 95% confidence interval, -5682 to -17,462; p < 0.001). The most frequent cause of readmission was pneumonia in both groups. LDLLT was associated with lower readmissions and health care costs in comparison with CLT. Our findings provide a scientific basis for further studies with larger cohorts.

Etiologic characteristics revealed by mNGS-mediated ultra-early and early microbiological identification in airway secretions from lung transplant recipients

Background

Post-operative etiological studies are critical for infection prevention in lung transplant recipients within the first year. In this study, mNGS combined with microbial culture was applied to reveal the etiological characteristics within one week (ultra-early) and one month (early) in lung transplant recipients, and the epidemiology of infection occurred within one month.

Methods

In 38 lung transplant recipients, deep airway secretions were collected through bronchofiberscope within two hours after the operation and were subjected to microbial identification by mNGS and microbial culture. The etiologic characteristics of lung transplant recipients were explored. Within one month, the infection status of recipients was monitored. The microbial species detected by mNGS were compared with the etiological agents causing infection within one month.

Results

The detection rate of mNGS in the 38 airway secretions specimens was significantly higher than that of the microbial culture (P<0.0001). MNGS identified 143 kinds of pathogenic microorganisms; bacterial pathogens account for more than half (72.73%), with gram-positive and -negative bacteria occupying large proportions. Fungi such as Candida are also frequently detected. 5 (50%) microbial species identified by microbial culture had multiple drug resistance (MDR). Within one month, 26 (68.42%) recipients got infected (with a median time of 9 days), among which 10 (38.46%) cases were infected within one week. In the infected recipients, causative agents were detected in advance by mNGS in 9 (34.62%) cases, and most of them (6, 66.67%) were infected within one week (ultra-early). In the infection that occurred after one week, the consistency between mNGS results and the etiological agents was decreased.

Conclusion

Based on the mNGS-reported pathogens in airway secretions samples collected within two hours, the initial empirical anti-infection regimes covering the bacteria and fungi are reasonable. The existence of bacteria with MDR forecasts the high risk of infection within 48 hours after transplant, reminding us of the necessity to adjust the antimicrobial strategy. The predictive role of mNGS performed within two hours in etiological agents is time-limited, suggesting continuous pathogenic identification is needed after lung transplant.

Role of the Nephrologist in Non-Kidney Solid Organ Transplant (NKSOT)

BACKGROUND

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a common complication of a non-kidney solid organ transplant (NKSOT). Identifying predisposing factors is crucial for an early approach and correct referral to nephrology.

METHODS

This is a single-center retrospective observational study of a cohort of CKD patients under follow-up in the Nephrology Department between 2010 to 2020. Statistical analysis was performed between all the risk factors and four dependent variables: end-stage renal disease (ESKD); increased serum creatinine ≥50%; renal replacement therapy (RRT); and death in the pre-transplant, peri-transplant, and post-transplant periods.

RESULTS

74 patients were studied (7 heart transplants, 34 liver transplants, and 33 lung transplants). Patients who were not followed-up by a nephrologist in the pre-transplant (p < 0.027) or peri-transplant (p < 0.046) periods and those who had the longest time until an outpatient clinic follow-up (HR 1.032) were associated with a higher risk of creatinine increase ≥50%. Receiving a lung transplant conferred a higher risk than a liver or heart transplant for developing a creatinine increase ≥50% and ESKD. Peri-transplant mechanical ventilation, peri-transplant and post-transplant anticalcineurin overdose, nephrotoxicity, and the number of hospital admissions were significantly associated with a creatinine increase ≥50% and developing ESKD.

CONCLUSIONS

Early and close follow-up by a nephrologist was associated with a decrease in the worsening of renal function.

Common Noninfectious Complications Following Lung Transplantation

According to the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, both transplant volume and survival among lung transplant recipients are improving over time. However, the outcomes of lung transplantation remain challenged by multiple thoracic and extrathoracic complications. With improving lung transplant survival, patients experience prolonged exposure to chronic immunosuppressive agents that can lead to multiple infectious and noninfectious complications. This article focuses on most common noninfectious complications with significant clinical impact.

Everolimus Based Immunosuppression Strategies in Adult Lung Transplant Recipients: Calcineurin Inhibitor Minimization Versus Calcineurin Inhibitor Elimination

Everolimus (EVE) provides an alternative to maintenance immunosuppression when conventional immunosuppression cannot be tolerated. EVE can be utilized with a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) minimization or elimination strategy. To date, clinical studies investigating EVE after lung transplant (LTx) have primarily focused on the minimization strategy to preserve renal function. The primary aim was to determine the preferred method of EVE utilization for lung transplant recipients (LTR). To undertake this aim, we compared the safety and efficacy outcomes of EVE as part of minimization and elimination immunosuppressant regimens. Single center retrospective study of 217 LTR initiated on EVE (120 CNI minimization and 97 CNI elimination). Survival outcomes were calculated from the date of EVE commencement. On multivariate analysis, LTR who received EVE as part of the CNI elimination strategy had poorer survival outcomes compared to the CNI minimization strategy [HR 1.61, 95% CI: 1.11-2.32, p=0.010]. Utilization of EVE for renal preservation was associated with improved survival compared to other indications [HR 0.64, 95% CI: 0.42-0.97, p=0.032]. EVE can be successfully utilized for maintenance immunosuppression post LTx, particularly for renal preservation. However, immunosuppressive regimens containing low dose CNI had superior survival outcomes, highlighting the importance of retaining a CNI wherever possible.

Rescue Everolimus Post Lung Transplantation is Not Associated With an Increased Incidence of CLAD or CLAD-Related Mortality

Everolimus (EVE) has been used as a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) minimization/ elimination agent or to augment immunosuppression in lung transplant recipients (LTR) with CNI-induced nephrotoxicity or neurotoxicity. The long-term evidence for survival and progression to chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) is lacking. The primary aim was to compare survival outcomes of LTR starting EVE-based immunosuppression with those remaining on CNI-based regimens. The secondary outcomes being time to CLAD, incidence of CLAD and the emergence of obstructive (BOS) or restrictive (RAS) phenotypes. Single center retrospective study of 91 LTR starting EVE-based immunosuppression matched 1:1 with LTR remaining on CNI-based immunosuppression. On multivariate analysis, compared to those remaining on CNI-based immunosuppression, starting EVE was not associated with poorer survival [HR 1.04, 95% CI: 0.67-1.61, p = 0.853], or a statistically significant faster time to CLAD [HR 1.34, 95% CI: 0.87-2.04, p = 0.182]. There was no difference in the emergence of CLAD (EVE, [n = 57, 62.6%] vs. CNI-based [n = 52, 57.1%], p = 0.41), or the incidence of BOS (p = 0.60) or RAS (p = 0.16) between the two groups. Introduction of EVE-based immunosuppression does not increase the risk of death or accelerate the progression to CLAD compared to CNI-based immunosuppression.

Current perspective of immunomodulators for lung transplant

Lung transplantation is an effective treatment option for selected patients suffering from end-stage lung disease. More intensive immunosuppression is enforced after lung transplants owing to a greater risk of rejection than after any other solid organ transplants. The commencing of lung transplantation in the modern era was in 1983 when the Toronto Lung Transplant Group executed the first successful lung transplant. A total of 43,785 lung transplants and 1365 heart-lung transplants have been performed from 1 Jan 1988 until 31 Jan 2021. The aim of this review article is to discuss the existing immunosuppressive strategies and emerging agents to prevent acute and chronic rejection in lung transplantation.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors for solid organ transplant recipients: clinical updates

Transplant care continues to advance with increasing clinical experience and improvements in immunosuppressive therapy. As the population ages and long-term survival improves, transplant patient care has become more complex due to comorbidities, frailty, and the increased prevalence of cancer posttransplantation. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become a standard treatment option for many cancers in non-transplant patients, but the use of ICIs in transplant patients is challenging due to the possibility of disrupting immune tolerance. However, over the past few years, ICIs have gradually started to be used in transplant patients as well. In this study, we review the current use of ICIs after all solid organ transplantation procedures (kidney, liver, heart, and lung). Increasing data suggest that the type and number of immunosuppressants may affect the risk of rejection after immunotherapy. Immunotherapy for cancer in transplant patients may be a feasible option for selected patients; however, prospective trials in specific organ transplant recipients are needed.

Nonallograft Complications of Lung Transplantation

Long-term exposure to immunosuppressive therapy may exacerbate pre-existing medical comorbidities or result in the development of new chronic medical conditions after lung transplantation. This article focuses on common nonallograft complications with the highest impact on short- and long-term outcomes after transplantation. These include diabetes mellitus, hypertension, dyslipidemia, kidney disease (acute and chronic), and malignancy. We discuss evidence-based strategies for the prevention, diagnosis, and management of these nonallograft complications in this article.

Ex Vivo Lung Perfusion: A Review of Current and Future Application in Lung Transplantation

The number of waitlisted lung transplant candidates exceeds the availability of donor organs. Barriers to utilization of donor lungs include suboptimal lung allograft function, long ischemic times due to geographical distance between donor and recipient, and a wide array of other logistical and medical challenges. Ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) is a modality that allows donor lungs to be evaluated in a closed circuit outside of the body and extends lung donor assessment prior to final acceptance for transplantation. EVLP was first utilized successfully in 2001 in Lund, Sweden. Since its initial use, EVLP has facilitated hundreds of lung transplants that would not have otherwise happened. EVLP technology continues to evolve and improve, and currently there are multiple commercially available systems, and more under investigation worldwide. Although barriers to universal utilization of EVLP exist, the possibility for more widespread adaptation of this technology abounds. Not only does EVLP have diagnostic capabilities as an organ monitoring device but also the therapeutic potential to improve lung allograft quality when specific issues are encountered. Expanded treatment potential includes the use of immunomodulatory treatment to reduce primary graft dysfunction, as well as targeted antimicrobial therapy to treat infection. In this review, we will highlight the historical development, the current state of utilization/capability, and the future promise of this technology.

Review: immunosuppression for the lung transplant patient

Lung transplantation (LTx) has evolved significantly since its inception and the improvement in LTx outcomes over the last three decades has predominantly been driven by advances in immunosuppression management. Despite the lack of new classes of immunosuppression medications, immunosuppressive strategies have evolved significantly from a universal method to a more targeted approach, reflecting a greater understanding of the need for individualized therapy and careful consideration of all factors that are influenced by immunosuppression choice. This has become increasingly important as the demographics of lung transplant recipients have changed over time, with older and more medically complex candidates being accepted and undergoing LTx. Furthermore, improved survival post lung transplant has translated into more immunosuppression related comorbidities long-term, predominantly chronic kidney disease (CKD) and malignancy, which has required further nuanced management approaches. This review provides an update on current traditional lung transplant immunosuppression strategies, with modifications based on pre-existing recipient factors and comorbidities, peri-operative challenges and long term complications, balanced against the perpetual challenge of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). As we continue to explore and understand the complexity of LTx immunology and the interplay of different factors, immunosuppression strategies will require ongoing critical evaluation and personalization in order to continue to improve lung transplant outcomes.

Postoperative Management of Lung Transplant Recipients in the Intensive Care Unit

The number of lung transplantations is progressively increasing worldwide, providing new challenges to interprofessional teams and the intensive care units. The outcome of lung transplantation recipients is critically affected by a complex interplay of particular pathophysiologic conditions and risk factors, knowledge of which is fundamental to appropriately manage these patients during the early postoperative course. As high-grade evidence-based guidelines are not available, the authors aimed to provide an updated review of the postoperative management of lung transplantation recipients in the intensive care unit, which addresses six main areas: (1) management of mechanical ventilation, (2) fluid and hemodynamic management, (3) immunosuppressive therapies, (4) prevention and management of neurologic complications, (5) antimicrobial therapy, and (6) management of nutritional support and abdominal complications. The integrated care provided by a dedicated multidisciplinary team is key to optimize the complex postoperative management of lung transplantation recipients in the intensive care unit.

Interventional and Surgical Treatments for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

Despite significant advancements in pharmacological treatment, interventional and surgical options are still viable treatments for patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), particularly idiopathic PAH. Herein, we review the interventional and surgical treatments for PAH. Atrial septostomy and the Potts shunt can be useful bridging tools for lung transplantation (Ltx), which remains the final surgical treatment among patients who are refractory to any other kind of therapy. Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO) remains the ultimate bridging therapy for patients with severe PAH. More importantly, VA-ECMO plays a crucial role during Ltx and provides necessary left ventricular conditioning during the initial postoperative period. Pulmonary denervation may potentially be a new way to ensure better transplant-free survival among patients with the aforementioned disease. However, high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed. As established, obtaining the Eisenmenger physiology among patients with severe pulmonary hypertension by creating artificial defects is associated with improved survival. However, right-to-left shunting may be harmful after Ltx. Closure of the artificially created defects may carry some risk associated with cardiac surgery, especially among patients with Potts shunts. In conclusion, PAH requires an interdisciplinary approach using pharmacological, interventional, and surgical modalities.

Selection Criteria for Lung Transplantation: Controversies and New Developments

Lung transplantation is an accepted therapeutic option for end-stage lung diseases. The imbalance between limited availability and vast need of donor organs necessitates careful selection of recipient candidates, ensuring the best possible utilization of the scarce resource of organs. Nonetheless, possible lung transplant candidates who could experience a meaningful improvement in survival and quality of life should not be excluded solely based on the complexity of their case. In this review, controversial issues or difficult limitations for lung transplantation, and new developments in recipient selection criteria, are discussed, which may help broaden recipient eligibility for lung transplantation without compromising long-term outcomes.

Skin Cancers and Lung Transplant

It is well known that solid-organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) have a 65- to 100-fold increase in the risk of developing skin cancer, namely, nonmelanoma skin cancers (NMSCs) such as cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) and basal cell carcinoma (BCC). In addition, these patients are also at increased risk for development of melanoma as well as other less common cutaneous malignancies (Merkel's cell carcinoma, Kaposi's sarcoma). SOTRs with NMSC (namely cSCC) are also at significantly increased risk of poor clinical outcomes including local recurrence, nodal and distant metastasis, and disease-specific death relative to patients who are not immunosuppressed. Increased surveillance and monitoring in patients at risk of aggressive disease and poor outcomes who are on immunosuppression is essential in patients with lung transplants given the high degree of immunosuppression. Increased awareness of risks, treatments, and management allows for improved outcomes in these patients. This article will provide an overview of the risk factors for the development of cutaneous malignancies in organ transplant recipients as well as a detailed discussion of various immunosuppressant and prophylactic medications used in this patient population that contribute to the risk of developing cutaneous malignancies, with an emphasis on NMSC (cSCC and BCC) in lung transplant recipients. Finally, this article includes a discussion on the clinical and dermatologic management of this high-risk immunosuppressed population including a review of topical and systemic agents for field therapy of actinic damage and chemoprevention of keratinocyte carcinomas. In addition, indications for additional treatment and preventive measures such as adjuvant radiation treatment after surgical management of cutaneous malignancies and potential modification of immunosuppressive medication regimens are discussed.

Safety of shoulder arthroplasty in lung transplant recipients

PURPOSE

Although shoulder arthroplasty is relatively safe in general population, it remains unclear in transplant recipient. Aim of this study was to determine outcomes and morbidity after shoulder arthroplasty in lung transplant recipients.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed at our university hospital center from 2001 to 2015. Main inclusion criterion was all lung transplant recipient who underwent shoulder arthroplasty. Clinical outcomes including Constant score, visual analogue scale (VAS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (ASES) were determined in pre-operative period and a minimum follow-up of 36 months. Special attention was taken about complications.

RESULTS

Among 700 lung transplant recipients, we identified 12 patients who underwent 14 shoulder arthroplasties. Arthroplasties were performed after proximal humeral avascular necrosis (n = 10), degenerative osteoarthritis (n = 1) and non-union of proximal humeral fracture (n = 1). 8 anatomical total shoulder arthroplasties and 6 reversed shoulder arthroplasties were performed. Mean follow-up was 61.4 months (± 22.1). Mean age was 47.1 (± 9.3) years. All patients had immunosuppression therapy at the time of surgery. Mean Constant score was improved at last follow-up [43(± 9.7) vs 94(± 4), p < 0.001]. VAS decreased from 6.4 (± 1.2) to 0.4 (± 0.8), p < 0.001. Mean ASES was improved from 33 (± 6) to 91 (± 5) at last follow-up (p < 0.001). Range of motion were improved between early post-operative evaluation and last follow-up: forward flexion: 85° (± 8°) vs 119°(± 13°); abduction: 83° (± 14°) vs 106°(± 23°); external rotation (RE1): 26° (± 7°) vs 36°(± 10°). At last follow-up, one revision was required for humeral prothesis loosening at 2 years post-surgery. One patient died due to acute pulmonary decompensation on chronic rejection 66 months after shoulder arthroplasty.

CONCLUSION

Shoulder arthroplasty is a safe procedure in this vulnerable population of lung transplant recipients. Such results encourage us to continue arthroplasty surgery when required.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Prolongation of allograft survival by artemisinin treatment is associated with blockade of OX40-OX40L

OBJECTIVES

It has been demonstrated that artemisinin (ART) possesses multiple immune modulatory effects. However, its role as immunosuppressant in allogeneic transplantation is undetermined. Here, we investigated the effect of ART on co-stimulatory signaling in OX40⁺ T cells and evaluated ART as a potential immunosuppressant in transplantation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Allogeneic skin transplantation was performed in C57BL/6 to BALB/c mice. Recipient mice were administrated with vehicle, ART or cyclosporine A daily from day 0 to day 19 post transplantation. Proportions of splenic CD4⁺OX40⁺ and CD4⁺CD44^hiCD62L^hi cells, and serum IgG was measured by using flow cytometry. An in vitro lymphocyte stimulation with Con A or LPS under various concentrations of ART was performed, expression of CD4⁺OX40⁺ and CD4⁺CD44^hiCD62L^hi cells was evaluated, and interleukin(IL)-6 production was measured by ELISA.

RESULTS

In in vivo allogeneic skin transplant model, ART significantly prolongs allogeneic skin survival. Furthermore, our in vitro studies demonstrate that the immune suppression of ART on T cells is associated with a reduction in OX40⁺ T cells and inhibition of IL-6 secretion.

CONCLUSION

Our data indicate that the OX40-OX40L pathway and IL-6 are possibly involved in ART-induced immunosuppression, and ART is a potential novel immunosuppressant.

Isolated Liver Rejection After Lung and Combined Kidney-Liver Transplantation: A Case Report

Liver allografts are unique in solid organ transplantation as they are less susceptible to both acute and chronic rejection. Operational tolerance, defined as prolonged graft survival in the absence of immunosuppression, is also achieved more frequently with liver allografts. It is unknown if the presence of multiple allografts in the same individual, levels of immunosuppression, or the presence of cystic fibrosis (CF) impacts the livers ability to ward off rejection or achieve operational tolerance. We describe an unsensitized, ABO-compatible patient with CF who underwent double lung transplantation and several years later a combined liver-kidney transplant. He developed isolated late acute T-cell mediated rejection of his liver allograft despite a high level of immunosuppression (IS) required for his lung and kidney allografts. To our knowledge, this is the first case of isolated liver rejection in a patient with 3 separate organ allografts, or in a patient with CF, to be reported in the literature. This isolated liver rejection is out of keeping with typically accepted ideas about orthotopic liver tolerance.

Network pharmacology-based analysis of the role of tacrolimus in liver transplantation

Background

Tacrolimus is a powerful immunosuppressant and has been widely used in organ transplantation. In order to further explore the role of tacrolimus in liver transplantation, we conducted network pharmacology analysis.

Methods

GSE100155 was obtained from the GEO database, and the DEGs of liver transplantation were analyzed. The 2D structure of tacrolimus was obtained from the National Library of Medicine, and the pharmacophore model of tacrolimus was predicted using the online tool pharmmapper. Then a network of tacrolimus and target genes was constructed through network pharmacology, and visualization and GO enrichment analysis was performed through Cytoscape. In addition, we also analyzed the correlation between key genes and immune infiltrating cells. The data of GSE84908 was used to verify the changes of key gene expression levels after tacrolimus treatment.

Results

The results of network pharmacological analysis showed that tacrolimus had 43 target genes, and the GO enrichment results showed many potential functions. Further analysis found that there were 5 key target genes in DEGs, and these 5 genes were significantly down-regulated in liver transplant patients. Another important finding was that 5 genes were significantly related to some immune infiltrating cells. The results of the GSE84908 data analysis showed that after tacrolimus treatment, the expression of DAAM1 was significantly increased (p = 0.015).

Conclusion

Tacrolimus may inhibit the human immune response by affecting the expression of DAAM1 in liver transplant patients.

Viral load-guided immunosuppression after lung transplantation (VIGILung)-study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Background

Immunosuppression including high-dose calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) is essential after lung transplantation. Dosing is usually guided by therapeutic drug monitoring adjusted to target trough levels of CNIs to keep the balance between over-dose causing severe toxicity and increased risk of infections or under-dose with a risk of graft injury. Adaptation of CNI-based immunosuppression by monitoring of torque teno virus (TTV), a latent nonpathogenic DNA virus, measured in the whole blood in addition to conventional therapeutic drug monitoring may reduce the toxicity of immunosuppression with similar efficacy.

Methods/design

An open-label, randomized, controlled, parallel-group, multicenter trial in lung transplant recipients will be conducted to investigate the safety and efficacy of immunosuppression guided by TTV monitoring as an add-on to conventional therapeutic drug monitoring. Adult lung transplant recipients 21 to 42 days after transplantation are eligible to participate. Patients (N = 144) will be randomized 1:1 to the experimental intervention (arm 1: immunosuppression guided by TTV monitoring in addition to conventional therapeutic drug monitoring of tacrolimus trough levels) and control intervention (arm 2: conventional therapeutic drug monitoring). Outcomes will be assessed 12 months after randomization with the change in glomerular filtration rate as the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints will be additional measurements of renal function, allograft function, incidence of acute rejections, incidence of chronic lung allograft dysfunction, graft loss, and infections.

Discussion

The results of this randomized controlled trial may reduce the toxicity of immunosuppression after lung transplantation while maintaining the efficacy of immunosuppression. Study results are transferable to all other solid organ transplantations.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04198506. Registered on 12 December 2019

Exploring failure of antimicrobial prophylaxis and pre-emptive therapy for transplant recipients: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES

Infections remain a threat for solid organ and stem cell transplant recipients. Antimicrobial prophylaxis and pre-emptive therapy have improved survival of these patients; however, the failure rates of prophylaxis are not negligible. The aim of this systematic review is to explore the reasons behind failure of antimicrobial prophylaxis and pre-emptive therapy.

SETTING

This systematic review included prospective randomised controlled trials and prospective single-arm studies.

PARTICIPANTS

The studies included were on prophylaxis and pre-emptive therapy of opportunistic infections in transplant recipients. Studies were included from databases MEDLINE, CENTRAL and Embase published until October first 2018.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary outcome measures were breakthrough infections, adverse events leading to stopping of treatment, switching medication or dose reduction. Secondary outcome measures were acquired resistance to antimicrobials, antifungals or antivirals and death.

RESULTS

From 3317 identified records, 30 records from 24 studies with 2851 patients were included in the systematic review. Seventeen focused on prophylactic and pre-emptive treatment of cytomegalovirus and seven studies on invasive fungal infection. The main reasons for failure of prophylaxis and pre-emptive therapy were adverse events and breakthrough infections, which were described in 54% (13 studies) and 38% (9 studies) of the included studies, respectively. In 25%, six of the studies, a detailed description of patients who experienced failure of prophylaxis or pre-emptive therapy was unclear or lacking.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that although failure is reported in the studies, the level of detail prohibits a detailed analysis of failure of prophylaxis and pre-emptive therapy. Clearly reporting on patients with a negative outcome should be improved. We have provided guidance on how to detect failure early in a clinical setting in accordance to the results from this systematic review.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42017077606.

Early clinical experience of bacteriophage therapy in 3 lung transplant recipients

Bacteriophage therapy (BT) uses bacteriophages to treat pathogenic bacteria and is an emerging strategy against multidrug-resistant (MDR) infections. Experience in solid organ transplant is limited. We describe BT in 3 lung transplant recipients (LTR) with life-threatening MDR infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 2) and Burkholderia dolosa (n = 1). For each patient, lytic bacteriophages were selected against their bacterial isolates. BT was administered for variable durations under emergency Investigational New Drug applications and with patient informed consent. Safety was assessed using clinical/laboratory parameters and observed clinical improvements described, as appropriate. All patients received concurrent antibiotics. Two ventilator-dependent LTR with large airway complications and refractory MDR P. aeruginosa pneumonia received BT. Both responded clinically and were discharged from the hospital off ventilator support. A third patient had recurrent B. dolosa infection following transplant. Following BT initiation, consolidative opacities improved and ventilator weaning was begun. However, infection relapsed on BT and the patient died. No BT-related adverse events were identified in the 3 cases. BT was well tolerated and associated with clinical improvement in LTRs with MDR bacterial infection not responsive to antibiotics alone. BT may be a viable adjunct to antibiotics for patients with MDR infections.