Hetrombopag: First Approval

Comparison of Hetrombopag and Eltrombopag Added to First-Line Immunosuppressive Therapy in Severe Aplastic Anemia

The addition of thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) to immunosuppressive therapy (IST) improves the hematologic response rate and quality in patients with severe aplastic anemia (SAA). However, no studies have yet reported on whether there are differences in the efficacy of TPO-RAs. Here, we retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of SAA patients who received hetrombopag (HPAG) or eltrombopag (EPAG) as part of first-line standard IST to compare the efficacy. Sixty-seven patients were enrolled in the HPAG group and 42 patients in the EPAG group. The overall hematologic response (OR) rates of the HPAG group at 3 and 6 months after IST were 50.7% and 65.6%, respectively, close to that of the EPAG group (50%, p = 0.973; 73.8%, p = 0.494). The rates of complete response (CR) at 3 and 6 months were 13.4% and 31.3% in the HPAG group, respectively, which were like those in the EPAG group (11.9% and 28.6%), with no statistical difference (p = 1.00 and 0.59). The median time to first response (3.0 vs. 3.2 months, p = 0.79) was similar in HPAG and EPAG. The overall survival (OS) rates were 91.0% and 92.8% in the HPAG group and EPAG group (p = 0.53), respectively. Monosomy 7 was detected in one patient in the EPAG group and her disease transformed into acute myelocytic leukemia (AML) at 25 months after ATG treatment. One patient in HPAG had trisomy 8 at 9 months of ATG treatment, and bone marrow examination showed no disease progression. CONCLUSION: The addition of HPAG to standard IST in SAA patients showed similar response rates and response quality to that of EPAG. HPAG could be an alternative to EPAG for the first-line treatment of SAA patients.

Application of thrombopoietic agents in cancer therapy-induced thrombocytopenia: A comprehensive review

Cancer therapy-induced thrombocytopenia (CT-IT) is one of the most common hematological toxicities of anti-cancer therapy, often leading to treatment dose reduced, postponed, or treatment plans altered or even discontinued. Thrombopoietin (TPO) is the only key regulatory factor in platelet production, and TPO receptor is considered an ideal target for the treatment of thrombocytopenia. Thrombopoietic agents, including recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO) and thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs), bind to different regions of the TPO receptor, activating downstream signaling pathways to increase platelet levels. In recent years, numerous studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of thrombopoietic agents in the management of CT-IT. These agents can reduce bleeding risk, decrease platelet transfusions, and maintain relative dose intensity (RDI) of anti-cancer treatments. This article provides a review of the current progress in the application of thrombopoietic agents for CT-IT management.

Hetrombopag treatment for immune thrombocytopenia in pregnancy refractory to corticosteroids and intravenous immunoglobulin: a case report

Pregnancy can lead to the recurrence or exacerbation of immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). Currently, first-line treatments of low-dose corticosteroids or intravenous immunoglobulin are considered safe and effective for both pregnant women and fetuses. However, there is no well-established treatment option for patients who are refractory to these medications. Herein, we report a case of a 31-year-old pregnant woman with recurrent and refractory ITP who was safely and effectively treated with hetrombopag, with no influence on the infant's platelet count. This case explores a new treatment option for the management of recurrent and refractory ITP in pregnancy.

Comparison of Thrombopoietin Receptor Agonists Plus Recombinant Human Thrombopoietin versus Recombinant Human Thrombopoietin Alone for Hematopoietic Reconstruction in Multiple Myeloma Patients Undergoing Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Hetrombopag is a novel thrombopoietin receptor agonist that has shown an additive effect in stimulating platelet production when combined with recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO). However, it remains unclear whether this combination can promote hematopoietic reconstruction after autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT).

PURPOSE

To compare the effect of rhTPO plus thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RA) versus rhTPO alone on hematopoietic recovery, adverse events, postoperative complications, and cost-effectiveness in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) undergoing ASCT.

METHODS

A total of 67 consecutive NDMM patients who underwent ASCT at our hospital from January 2021 to May 2024 were included. Of these patients, 35 received a combination of rhTPO and the TPO-RA hetrombopag after stem cell reinfusion (observation group), whereas 32 patients received rhTPO alone (control group). Hematopoietic reconstitution between the two groups was compared.

RESULTS

Baseline clinical characteristics were similar between both groups. In the observation group, the median time to platelet recovery was 9 days after stem cell reinfusion, which was significantly shorter than that in the control group (P = .003). The mean number of platelet transfusions in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group (1.0 vs. 2.0 units, P = .034). All patients tolerated rhTPO and TPO-RA well, with no thrombotic events observed. Survival analysis showed no reduction in time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) with the addition of TPO-RA. There were no statistical differences in the incidence of adverse events, drug expenses, and hospital stay between two groups (P  > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Although sample size and study design limit the data from this study, our findings suggest that the combination of TPO-RA (hetrombopag) and rhTPO enhances platelet recovery in comparison with rhTPO alone, without increasing adverse effects.

Real-world evidence of avatrombopag for the treatment of immune thrombocytopenia intolerant or ineffective to eltrombopag/hetrombopag

Due to the limited real-world research on the application of avatrombopag (AVA) for immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) in China, we evaluated the effectiveness and safety of AVA in clinical practice. We included 121 adult ITP patients treated with AVA across three medical centres. Based on the reasons for choosing AVA, these patients were divided into eltrombopag (ELT)/hetrombopag (HET) intolerance group (IG), and ELT/HET unresponsive group (UG). Compared with UG, more patients in IG had a history of liver disease and received fewer treatments before AVA. Amongst all patients, 83% had platelet response (≥30 × 109/L) after AVA and 62% achieved complete response (≥100 × 109/L, CR). Sixty-two percent in IG and 56% in UG were able to discontinue more than one concomitant ITP medication. A total of 17 patients underwent multiple switches of thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs), resulting in an 88% platelet response rate. Sixty-three patients discontinued AVA, 27% were due to unaffordability. AVA was well tolerated in most patients. In the ITP population, AVA proved effective and safe, particularly in patients intolerant or unresponsive to ELT/HET. Patients benefited from TPO-RAs switches, particularly those undergoing multiple switches. However, many patients struggled with the long-term financial burden of AVA.

The effect of hetrombopag combined with conventional treatment on immune function and quality of life in patients with severe aplastic anemia

This study aimed to investigate the effect of hetrombopag combined with conventional treatment on immune function in patients with severe aplastic anemia (SAA). Patients were categorized into the control group (n = 50, receiving conventional treatment only) and experimental group (n = 50, receiving hetrombopag combined with conventional treatment). Before treatment and at weeks 18, 24, and 52 after treatment, the two groups were compared in routine blood test indicators, natural killer (NK) cell activity, and peripheral blood inflammatory factor levels. The overall remission rate and incidence of adverse events were also compared between the two groups. Outpatient or telephone follow-up was performed before treatment and at weeks 18, 24, and 52 after treatment to observe patients' immune function, treatment outcome, quality of life, and adverse events. Hemoglobin (Hb), and platelet count (PLT) (P < 0.05), and a rise in NK cell activity (P < 0.05). Interleukin (IL-10) levels were significantly higher, while IL-6 levels were significantly lower in the experimental group compared to the control group (P < 0.05). After receiving the treatment, all scores of SF-36 domains in both groups were higher than before treatment, particularly with higher scores in the experimental group (P < 0.05). Hetrombopag combined with conventional treatment improved the immune function and hematopoiesis of patients with SAA.

Efficacy and safety of hetrombopag in the treatment of recombinant human thrombopoietin-resistant thrombocytopenia after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Background

Thrombocytopenia after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation is a challenging clinical problem. Recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO) and thrombopoietin receptor agonists are increasingly used in posttransplant thrombocytopenia. However, the use of hetrombopag in patients with posttransplant thrombocytopenia, especially in patients with resistance to rhTPO, has not yet been reported.

Objectives

The present study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of hetrombopag in patients with rhTPO-resistant posttransplant thrombocytopenia.

Methods

This retrospective study included 21 patients with rhTPO-resistant posttransplant thrombocytopenia who received hetrombopag from August 2021 to July 2022. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate, including partial response and complete response (CR). We also evaluated the predictors of hetrombopag efficacy and adverse events.

Results

The overall response rate to hetrombopag was 81%, and the CR rate was 62%. The median time from hetrombopag initiation to response and CR were 16 and 31 days, respectively. Decreased megakaryocytes in bone marrow negatively correlated with CR to hetrombopag (P = .03). All the patients tolerated hetrombopag well without any significant increase in adverse events. At the last follow-up, 71% of responders had discontinued hetrombopag and sustained their best response.

Conclusion

Our results suggested that hetrombopag is an effective treatment option to promote platelet recovery in patients with posttransplant thrombocytopenia, even in patients resistant to rhTPO.

Thrombopoietin Receptor Agonists in Post-Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Complicated by Prolonged Thrombocytopenia: A Comprehensive Review

Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is a well-established procedure that has become a therapeutic mainstay for various hematological conditions. Prolonged thrombocytopenia following HCT is associated with a significant risk of morbidity and mortality, yet no universally recognized treatment protocol exists for such a complication. First-generation thrombopoietin receptor (TpoR) agonists as well as second-generation agents are known for their role in enhancing platelet production, and their use is expanding across various thrombocytopenic conditions. Therefore, we conducted this comprehensive review of the literature to provide an updated evaluation of the use of TpoR agonists and explore their efficacy and safety in the treatment of extended post-HCT thrombocytopenia. The literature search was conducted using PubMed database from 1996 through December 2023, using a predefined strategy with medical subject headings terms. We identified 64 reports on the utility of TpoR agonists, five of them were randomized controlled trials and the rest were retrospective observational studies and case series, with a total number of 1730 patients. Second-generation TpoR agonists appear more convenient than subcutaneous recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTpo) as they can be orally administered and exhibit similar efficacy in platelet recovery, as indicated by recent trial results. Among these agents, avatrombopag, unlike eltrombopag, does not require any dietary restrictions, which could be more favorable for patients. However, eltrombopag remains the most extensively studied agent. TpoR agonists had promising effects in the treatment of post-HCT thrombocytopenia with a good safety profile so far, highlighting the potential benefit of their use.

Switching from eltrombopag to hetrombopag in patients with primary immune thrombocytopenia: a post-hoc analysis of a multicenter, randomized phase III trial

While studies have explored the feasibility of switching between various thrombopoietin receptor agonists in treating immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), data on the switching from eltrombopag to hetrombopag remains scarce. This post-hoc analysis of a phase III hetrombopag trial aimed to assess the outcomes of ITP patients who switched from eltrombopag to hetrombopag. In the original phase III trial, patients initially randomized to the placebo group were switched to eltrombopag. Those who completed this 14-week eltrombopag were eligible to switch to a 24-week hetrombopag. Treatment response, defined as a platelet count of ≥ 50 × 109/L, and safety were evaluated before and after the switch. Sixty-three patients who completed the 14-week eltrombopag and switched to hetrombopag were included in this post-hoc analysis. Response rates before and after the switch were 66.7% and 88.9%, respectively. Among those with pre-switching platelet counts below 30 × 109/L, eight out of 12 patients (66.7%) responded, while eight out of nine patients (88.9%) with pre-switching platelet counts between 30 × 109/L and 50 × 109/L responded post-switching. Treatment-related adverse events were observed in 50.8% of patients during eltrombopag treatment and 38.1% during hetrombopag treatment. No severe adverse events were noted during hetrombopag treatment. Switching from eltrombopag to hetrombopag in ITP management appears to be effective and well-tolerated. Notably, hetrombopag yielded high response rates, even among patients who had previously shown limited response to eltrombopag. However, these observations need to be confirmed in future trials.

Hetrombopag for the management of chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia in patients with advanced solid tumors: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II study

Background

Chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (CIT) increases the risk of bleeding, necessitates chemotherapy dose reductions and delays, and negatively impacts prognosis.

Objectives

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of hetrombopag for the management of CIT in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Design

A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II study.

Methods

Patients with advanced solid tumors who experienced a chemotherapy delay of ⩾7 days due to thrombocytopenia (platelet count <75 × 109/L) were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive oral hetrombopag at an initial dose of 7.5 mg once daily or a matching placebo. The primary endpoint was the proportion of treatment responders, defined as patients resuming chemotherapy within 14 days (platelet count ⩾100 × 109/L) and not requiring a chemotherapy dose reduction of ⩾15% or a delay of ⩾4 days or rescue therapy for two consecutive cycles.

Results

Between 9 October 2021 and 5 May 2022, 60 patients were randomized, with 59 receiving ⩾1 dose of assigned treatment (hetrombopag/placebo arm, n = 28/31). The proportion of treatment responders was significantly higher in the hetrombopag arm than in the placebo arm [60.7% (17/28) versus 12.9% (4/31); difference of proportion: 47.6% (95% confidence interval (CI): 26.0-69.3); odds ratio = 10.44 (95% CI: 2.82-38.65); p value (nominal) based on the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel: <0.001)]. During the double-blind treatment period, grade 3 or higher adverse events (AEs) occurred in 35.7% (10/28) of patients with hetrombopag and 38.7% (12/31) of patients on placebo. The most common grade 3 or higher AEs were decreased neutrophil count [35.7% (10/28) versus 35.5% (11/31)] and decreased white blood cell count [17.9% (5/28) versus 19.4% (6/31)]. Serious AEs were reported in 3.6% (1/28) of patients with hetrombopag and 9.7% (3/31) of patients with placebo.

Conclusion

Hetrombopag is an effective and well-tolerated alternative for managing CIT in patients with solid tumors.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03976882.

Herombopag for the treatment of persistent thrombocytopenia following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Allo-HSCT) stands as a pivotal treatment for hematologic malignancies, often considered the sole effective treatment option. A frequent complication following allo-HSCT is poor graft function (PGF), with one of its primary manifestations being persistent thrombocytopenia (PT), comprising prolonged isolated thrombocytopenia (PIT) and secondary failure of platelet recovery (SFPR). Conventional treatment methods have had poor efficacy and a high transplantation-associated mortality rate. In recent years, the efficacy of eltrombopag has been reported in the treatment of post-transplantation PT, and additional thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RA) have been developed. Herombopag is a next-generation TPO-RA which has strong proliferation-promoting effects on human TPO-R-expressing cells (32D-MPL) and hematopoietic progenitor cells in vitro. We reviewed eighteen patients with transplantation-associated thrombocytopenia who received herombopag when eltrombopag was ineffective or poorly tolerated and evaluated its efficacy including effects on survival. Herombopag was administered at a median time of 197 days post-transplantation. Six patients achieved complete response (CR), with a median time to CR of 56 days. Five patients achieved partial response (PR), and the median time to PR was 43 days. Seven patients were considered to have no response (NR). The overall response (OR) rate was 61.1%, and the cumulative incidence (CI) of OR was 90.2%. No patients developed herombopag-associated grade 3-4 toxicity. The median follow-up period was 6.5 months. Twelve patients survived and six patients died, with an overall survival rate of 66.7%. This is the first study to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of herombopag in transplantation-associated thrombocytopenia after failing eltrombopag, introducing a new approach in the treatment of PT following allo-HSCT.

Synthetic Approaches to the New Drugs Approved During 2022

In 2022, 23 new small molecule chemical entities were approved as drugs by the United States FDA, European Union EMA, Japan PMDA, and China NMPA. This review describes the synthetic approach demonstrated on largest scale for each new drug based on patent or primary literature. The synthetic routes highlight practical methods to construct molecules, sometimes on the manufacturing scale, to access the new drugs. Ten additional drugs approved in 2021 and one approved in 2020 are included that were not covered in the previous year's review.

Thrombopoietin receptor agonists use and risk of thrombotic events in patients with immune thrombocytopenic purpura: A systematic review and meta‑analysis of randomized controlled trials

Thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) have a role in second-line immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) treatment, binding to and activating thrombopoietin receptors on megakaryocyte membranes in the bone marrow. This promotes megakaryocyte maturation and increases platelet production. Despite a 2-6% incidence of thrombotic events during TPO-RA treatment, it remains uncertain whether TPO-RAs elevate thrombosis rates. A comprehensive search of electronic databases was conducted using the relevant search criteria. To assess the risk of bias, the included studies were assessed using the revised Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool 2.0, and a meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4.1. A total of 1,698 patients with ITP were included from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). There were 26 thromboembolic events in the TPO-RAs group and 4 in the control group. However, there was no significant difference in the incidence of thrombotic events between the two groups [odds ratio (OR)=1.76, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.78-4.00, P=0.18], even if the duration of treatment was >12 weeks (OR=2.46, 95% CI: 0.81-7.43, P=0.11). Subgroup analysis showed that none of the four drugs significantly increased the incidence of thrombotic events (romiplostim: OR=0.92, 95% CI: 0.14-6.13, P=0.93; eltrombopag: OR=2.32, 95% CI: 0.64-8.47, P=0.20; avatrombopag: OR=4.15, 95% CI: 0.20-85.23, P=0.36; and hetrombopag: OR=0.76, 95% CI: 0.03-18.76, P=0.87). There was also no significant difference in the results of the double-blinded placebo-controlled RCTs (OR=1.21, 95% CI: 0.41-3.58, P=0.73). Compared to patients with ITP who did not receive TPO-RA treatment, those receiving TPO-RA treatment did not exhibit a significantly increased risk of thrombotic events.

Knowledge map of thrombopoietin receptor agonists: A bibliometric analysis

Thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) have been widely used to treat thrombocytopenia, however, a scientometric profile of TPO-RAs research is lacking. Methods: This study uses VOSviewer, CiteSpace, and R software to provide an overview of current research, highlight study hotspots, and predict future research directions of TPO-RAs. Results: One thousand seven hundred and nineteen relevant studies from 1993 to 2022 with 43962 citations were identified from the Web of Science Core Collection. Over three decades, the USA has been leading TPO-RAs publications. Industries and academic institutions have been actively involved in TPO-RAs research, with funding provided by pharmaceutical companies and public funding bodies. The most productive and cited journals are British Journal of Hematology and Blood, respectively. When author keywords were categorised into three clusters, i.e., cluster 1 (immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP)), cluster 2 (avatrombopag, lusutrombopag, and thrombocytopenia), and cluster 3 (TPO-RAs for ITP and off-label drug use), ITP was found to be the current research hotspot, while oral TPO-RAs and licensed or unlicensed drug indications of thrombocytopenic diseases require further investigation. Conclusion: This study has generated the knowledge map of TPO-RAs, which provides a dynamic roadmap for future research in this field.

Efficacy and Safety of Hetrombopag for Thrombocytopenia in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors: A Retrospective Study

Objective. To analyze and evaluate the clinical value of hetrombopag in cancer therapy-induced thrombocytopenia (CTIT) caused by antitumor therapy for malignant tumors and to provide scientific evidence support for clinical application in the real-world setting. Methods. The clinical data of CTIT patients with advanced solid tumors who received hetrombopag were analyzed retrospectively. The proportion of patients with different characteristics who recovered platelet count to ≥75 × 109/L at day 14 and the effective rate of platelet elevation was compared by the χ2 test or Fisher exact probability method. $P<0.05$ was considered statistically significant. Results. A total of 60 CTIT patients who received hetrombopag at our site from July 2021 to October 2022 were finally included in this study. The proportion of patients who achieved therapeutic effect within (7 ± 2) days after treatment was 26.7% (16/60), among which 20.0% (12/60) patients had platelet count recovered to ≥100 × 109/L, and 25.0% (15/60) patients had platelet count increase from baseline ≥50 × 109/L. Within (14 ± 2) days of treatment with hetrombopag, 66.7% (40/60) of patients achieved treatment response, of whom 56.7% (34/60) had platelet counts ≥100 × 109/L and 53.3% (32/60) had platelet counts ≥50 × 109/L increase from baseline. In addition, no treatment-related adverse events occurred during the treatment period. Conclusion. This retrospective study provides preliminary evidence that hetrombopag increases platelets in CTIT patients receiving antitumor therapy for advanced solid tumors.

Thrombopoietin-receptor agonists for adult patients with immune thrombocytopenia: a narrative review and an approach for managing patients fasting intermittently

Introduction

Thrombopoietin-receptor agonist (TPO-RAs) currently represent the state of art for treating immune thrombocytopenia. Their different molecular structures contribute to the difference in their pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics. This narrative review aims to provide an overview of the current TPO-RAs approved for primary immune thrombocytopenia (romiplostim, eltrombopag, avatrombopag) and the effect of intermittent fasting in adult patients receiving TPO-RAs.

Areas covered

Literature was searched with no limits on date or language, using various combinations of keywords. Data on the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, efficacy, and safety of TPO-RAs and the effect of intermittent fasting were summarized.

Expert opinion

Switching between TPO-RAs is a useful strategy to tackle some associated limitations. Romiplostim and avatrombopag have an advantage over eltrombopag as they do not require any dietary restrictions. In cases where romiplostim and avatrombopag are unavailable, patients should be educated on the appropriate administration, possible interactions, and dietary restrictions before initiating eltrombopag.

Efficacy and safety of QL0911 in adult patients with chronic primary immune thrombocytopenia: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial

Objective

QL0911, a recombinant human thrombopoietin mimetic peptide-Fc fusion protein, is a romiplostim (Nplate®) biosimilar used to treat primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). This phase III study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of QL0911 in adult patients with chronic primary ITP over a 24-week treatment period.

Methods

We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III study in patients diagnosed with primary ITP for at least 12 months who had received at least one first-line ITP treatment with no response or recurrence after treatment, or who relapsed after splenectomy at 44 sites in China. Patients were randomly allocated (2:1 ratio) to QL0911 or placebo injection subcutaneously once weekly at an initial dose of 1 μg/kg for 24 weeks. The doses were adjusted to maintain the target platelet counts from 50 × 109/L to 200 × 109/L. Patients and investigators were blinded to the assignment. The primary endpoints were the proportion of patients who achieved a durable platelet response at week 24 (platelet count, ≥ 50 × 109/L during 6 of the last 8 weeks of treatment) and safety. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05621330).

Results

Between October 2019 and December 2021, 216 patients were randomly assigned (QL0911,144; placebo,72). A durable platelet response was achieved by significantly more patients in the QL0911 group (61.8%, 95% CI: 53.3-69.8; P < 0.0001) than in the placebo group (0%). The mean duration of platelet responses was 15.9 (SE: 0.43) weeks with QL0911, and 1.9 (SE:0.26) week with placebo. Consistent results were achieved in subgroup analyses categorized by baseline splenectomy status (yes/no), concomitant ITP treatment (yes/no), and baseline platelet count (≤ 10 × 109/L, > 10 × 109/L, ≤ 20 × 109/L, > 20 × 109/L, and < 30 × 109/L). The incidence of TEAEs was comparable between the QL0911 and the placebo groups (91.7% and 88.9%, respectively). The most common adverse events overall were ecchymosis (28.5% for QL0911 vs. 37.5% for placebo), upper respiratory tract infections respiratory tract infections (31.9% for QL0911 vs. 27.8% for placebo), and gingival bleeding (17.4% for QL0911 vs. 26.4% for placebo).

Conclusion

QL0911 was well-tolerated and increased and maintained platelet counts in adults with ITP. QL0911, a biosimilar to romiplostim (Nplate®), may be a novel treatment option for patients with ITP who have failed or relapsed from first-line treatment in China. Ongoing studies will provide further data on long-term efficacy and safety in such patient populations.

Avatrombopag, a promising novel thrombopoietin receptor agonist for refractory/relapsed/intolerant non-severe aplastic anemia: a phase 2 single-arm clinical trial

INTRODUCTION

The therapeutic options for thrombocytopenia in non-severe aplastic anaemia (NSAA) are limited. Avatrombopag (AVA) is prescribed for thrombocytopenic diseases but not for NSAA.

METHODS

Herein, we conducted a phase 2, non-randomized, single-arm trial to explore the efficacy and safety of AVA in refractory/relapsed/intolerant NSAA. AVA dose was initiated at 20 mg/d and titrated to a maximum of 60 mg/d. The primary endpoint was the haematological response at 3 months.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients were analyzed. The overall response rate (ORR) at 3 months was 56% (14/25), with 12% (3/25) achieving a complete response (CR). At a median follow-up of 7 (3-10) months, the OR and CR rates were 52% and 20%, respectively. Responders had a shorter duration of diagnosis of AVA administration than non-responders (10 (6-80) vs 37 (6-480) months, p = 0.027) and belonged to the relapsed/intolerant NSAA type (71% vs 27%, p = 0.047); 44% (8/18) patients previously treated with eltrombopag before enrollment responded at 3 months, with an average prior eltrombopag dose of median 72.5 (50-100) mg/d and an average AVA dose for a response of median 43.5 (20-60) mg/d. 3-month ORR had no significant correlation with eltrombopag exposure (p = 0.09), prior eltrombopag length (R²=0.11), or cumulative eltrombopag dose (R²=0.30). Only one patient relapsed after stopping AVA for 1 month. No serious AVA-related side effects or clone evolution were detected.

CONCLUSION

AVA is effective and well-tolerated in NSAA patients who are refractory, relapsed, or intolerant to CsA/tacrolimus ± eltrombopag. Earlier treatment and relapsed/intolerant AA may show a better short-term response rate. More studies are needed to define the optimal dose and the long-term efficacy (NCT04728789).

Hetrombopag plus recombinant human thrombopoietin for chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia in patients with solid tumors

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (CIT) is a common hematological complication in patients with cancer. Hetrombopag is a novel thrombopoietin receptor agonist that has shown an additive effect in stimulating platelet production when combined with recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO).

OBJECTIVES

This multicenter retrospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of hetrombopag plus rhTPO compared with rhTPO alone for CIT.

METHODS

A total of 294 patients with solid tumors and CIT (platelet count, <50 × 109/L) who received either rhTPO plus hetrombopag (146 patients) or rhTPO alone (148 patients) at 3 centers from January to December 2022 were included in the study. The primary outcome was a platelet count at least 50 × 109/L higher than the baseline value within 14 days. Chemotherapy dose reductions/delays, bleeding, and adverse events were reported.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty patients (82.2%) in the rhTPO-hetrombopag group vs 100 patients (67.6%) in the rhTPO group achieved the primary outcome (P = .005). This significant difference persisted in adjusted analysis (odds ratio, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.12-3.60). A total of 115 patients (78.8%) in the rhTPO-hetrombopag group and 101 patients (68.2%) in the rhTPO group avoided chemotherapy dose reductions/delays (P = .041). There was no significant difference in bleeding rates, and adverse events were mild and similar between the 2 groups. No deaths occurred.

CONCLUSION

Compared to rhTPO alone, our findings suggest that the combination of hetrombopag and rhTPO is safe and more effective in patients with CIT.

Avatrombopag for adult chronic primary immune thrombocytopenia: a randomized phase 3 trial in China

Background

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune disorder with decreased platelet counts and increased bleeding risk.

Objectives

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of avatrombopag, a second-generation oral thrombopoietin receptor agonist, for the treatment of Chinese patients with chronic primary ITP.

Methods

This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study (CTR20210431) consisted of a 6-week double-blind core treatment phase followed by a 20-week, open-label extension phase. Chinese adults with chronic primary ITP for at least 12 months and a platelet count <30 × 109/L were randomized (2:1) to receive avatrombopag (initial dose of 20 mg/day) or matched placebo. The primary endpoint was the proportion of subjects with a platelet count ≥50 × 109/L at week 6 of the core treatment phase in absence of rescue therapy.

Results

In total, 74 patients were randomized (avatrombopag: N = 48; placebo: N = 26) between March 5, 2021, and August 6, 2021; all of whom entered the extension phase (72 received avatrombopag up to 26 weeks). At week 6 of the core study, the platelet response (≥50 x 109/L) rate was significantly higher in the avatrombopag group (77.1%; 95% CI, 62.7, 88.0) vs placebo (7.7%; 95% CI, 1.0, 25.1); the treatment difference was 69.4% (95% CI, 56.2, 86.3; P < .0001). During the 6-week core study, treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 41 (85.4%) and 20 (76.9%) patients in the avatrombopag and placebo groups, respectively. The most common avatrombopag-related treatment-emergent adverse events were upper respiratory tract infection (14/48 [29.2%]), increased platelet count (13/48 [27.1%]) and headache (7/48 [14.6%]).

Conclusion

Avatrombopag was efficacious and generally well tolerated in Chinese patients with chronic primary ITP, with comparable efficacy and safety to previous reports in Western patients.

Safety of non‑peptide thrombopoietin receptor agonists in patients with immune thrombocytopenia: A systematic review and meta‑analysis of short‑term double‑blind randomized clinical trials

The aim of the present study was to analyze the safety of non-peptide thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) for immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) treatment. All studies reporting adverse events (AEs) in relation to ITP treatment with eltrombopag, avatrombopag, and hetrombopag were retrieved from PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases. RevMan 5.4.1 was used for meta-analysis, heterogeneity and bias analyses. A total of 1,078 patients from seven eligible studies were enrolled. In the enrolled clinical trials, the double-blind period was between 6 weeks and 6 months. The results revealed that the chances of any AEs [relative risk (RR)=1.16; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.90-1.51; I²=78%; P=0.26], grade 3/4 AEs (RR=1.07; 95% CI, 0.63-1.80; I²=0%; P=0.81), elevated transaminase levels (RR=1.09; 95% CI, 0.68-1.74; I²=0%; P=0.72), thrombosis (RR=1.92; 95% CI, 0.55-6.66; I²=0%; P=0.31) and cataracts (RR=0.83; 95% CI, 0.38-1.83; I²=0%; P=0.65) were not significantly higher in patients with ITP that received non-peptide TPO-RAs compared with patients with ITP treated with a placebo. The present study indicated that non-peptide TPO-RAs were relatively safe for patients with ITP, at least within 6 months of administration.

Emerging data on thrombopoietin receptor agonists for management of chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia

INTRODUCTION

Chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (CIT) is a common complication of cancer treatment, frequently leading to reduced relative dose intensity, and is associated with reduced survival. Given the lack of FDA-approved therapies for CIT, thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) have received significant attention for treatment and prevention of CIT.

AREAS COVERED

This review will summarize the development of prior agents for treatment of CIT, discuss the existing literature investigating the use of TPO-RAs in CIT primarily in patients with solid tumor malignancies, and offer insights on the future direction of TPO-RAs and other therapeutics for CIT.

EXPERT OPINION

In alignment with NCCN guidelines, we recommend that patients with CIT participate in a clinical trial for consideration of TPO-RA treatment or consider off-label use of romiplostim when participation in clinical trials is not possible. The literature to date supports the use of TPO-RAs for treatment of persistent CIT. Further data is needed to describe the long-term efficacy, safety, and prescribing practices of TPO-RAs in a diverse patient population with a variety of tumor types and chemotherapy regimens in addition to exploring the underlying biology of CIT.

Hetrombopag plus porcine ATG and cyclosporine for the treatment of aplastic anaemia: early outcomes of a prospective pilot study

Hetrombopag, a small molecular thrombopoietin-receptor agonist, has shown encouraging efficiency in immunosuppressive therapy refractory or relapsed severe aplastic anaemia. To investigate the response rate of hetrombopag combined with IST as first-line treatment, we designed a prospective pilot study including 32 patients with SAA treated with anti-human T lymphocyte porcine immunoglobulin (p-ATG), cyclosporine, and hetrombopag. In addition, 96 patients with SAA treated with p-ATG and cyclosporine alone were matched as controls. In total, 21.9% of patients treated with hetrombopag achieved complete response (CR) at 3 months, while 5.2% of patients achieved CR in the control group (P = 0.005). At 6 months, the CR rates were 34.4% in the hetrombopag group and 14.6% in the control group (P = 0.015). The overall response rates at 6 months were 68.7% and 50.0% in the hetrombopag and control groups, respectively. The median time to haematologic response was 56 days and 77 days, and to CR was 96 days and 214 days in the hetrombopag and control groups, respectively. In conclusion, adding hetrombopag to IST as first-line treatment resulted in faster and better haematologic response in SAA.

Advances in myelodysplastic syndromes: promising novel agents and combination strategies

INTRODUCTION

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are heterogeneous group of clonal hematopoietic stem cell neoplasms that have limited approved treatment options. Multiple novel agents are currently being tested in a clinical trial setting. From a therapeutic perspective, MDS is generally divided into lower-risk and higher-risk disease. In this review, we summarize some of the most prominent novel agents currently in development.

AREAS COVERED

This review focuses on select clinical trials in both lower- and higher-risk MDS, elucidating the mechanisms of action and rationale for drug combinations and summarizing early safety and efficacy data using novel agents in MDS.

EXPERT OPINION

Advances in understanding the innate immune system, telomere biology, as well as genomic drivers of the disease have led to the development of multiple novel agents that are currently in late stages of clinical development in MDS. Imetelstat is being tested in lower-risk disease and the phase III clinical trial recently completed accrual. Magrolimab, sabatolimab, and venetoclax in addition to novel oral hypomethylating agents (HMA) are being investigated in higher-risk MDS. These advances will hopefully bring better treatment options to patients and lead to a shift in the treatment paradigm. Post HMA therapy remains an area of dire unmet need.

Thrombopoietin receptor agonists for chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia: a new solution for an old problem

Chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (CIT) is common, resulting in increased bleeding risk and chemotherapy delays, dose reduction, and treatment discontinuation, which can negatively affect oncologic outcomes. The only agent approved by the US Food and Drug Administration to manage CIT (oprelvekin) was voluntarily withdrawn from the market by the manufacturer, leaving few options for patients. Therefore, patients experiencing CIT present a significant clinical challenge in daily practice. The availability of thrombopoietin receptor agonists has led to formal clinical trials describing efficacy in CIT as well as a rather extensive body of published observational data from off-label use in this setting but no formal regulatory indications for CIT to date. The accumulated data, however, have affected National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, which now recommend consideration of TPO-RA clinical trials as well as off-label use of romiplostim. This review article details the evidence to date for the management of CIT with thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs), discussing the efficacy data, the specific circumstances when treatment is warranted (and when it is generally unnecessary), and safety considerations. Specific recommendations regarding patient selection, initiation, dosing, titration, and discontinuation for TPO-RA therapy in CIT are given, based on published data and expert opinion where evidence is lacking.

Iron chelation of hetrombopag in aplastic anemia: a post hoc analysis of a phase II study

Hetrombopag is the only CFDA-approved thrombopoietin (TPO) receptor agonist for severe aplastic anemia (SAA) in China. Its chemical structure has an iron chelation domain. To explore the iron chelation effect of hetrombopag, we performed a post hoc analysis of the phase II clinical trial (NCT03557099). Thirty-five immunosuppressive therapy (IST)-refractory SAA patients were enrolled in the study, and the longitudinal changes of serum ferritin (SF) were assessed. At 18 weeks post-hetrombopag initiation, 51.4% of patients showed decreased SF levels by a median of 49.0 (18.1-95.5) % from baseline (median ΔSF decrease value, 917.2 ng/ml, range from 104.0 to 7030.0 ng/ml). A decrease in SF was found in 75.0% of hematologic responders and 31.6% of non-responders. Among the 24 patients with iron overload, 12 had decreased SF levels by up to 51% of the baseline. Patients with normal SF levels also showed decreased SF levels, and iron deficiency occurred in two patients. In conclusion, hetrombopag showed a powerful and rapid iron chelation effect.

Treatment of drug-induced immune thrombocytopenias

Several therapeutic agents can cause thrombocytopenia by either immune-mediated or non-immune-mediated mechanisms. Non-immune-mediated thrombocytopenia is due to direct toxicity of drug molecules to platelets or megakaryocytes. Immune-mediated thrombocytopenia, on the other hand, involves the formation of antibodies that react to platelet-specific glycoprotein complexes, as in classic drug-induced immune thrombocytopenia (DITP), or to platelet factor 4, as in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT). Clinical signs include a rapid drop in platelet count, bleeding or thrombosis. Since the patient's condition can deteriorate rapidly, prompt diagnosis and management are critical. However, the necessary diagnostic tests are only available in specialized laboratories. Therefore, the most demanding step in treatment is to identify the agent responsible for thrombocytopenia, which often proves difficult because many patients are taking multiple medications and have comorbidities that can themselves also cause thrombocytopenia. While DITP is commonly associated with an increased risk of bleeding, HIT and VITT have a high mortality rate due to the high incidence of thromboembolic complications. A structured approach to drug-associated thrombocytopenia/thrombosis can lead to successful treatment and a lower mortality rate. In addition to describing the treatment of DITP, HIT, VITT, and vaccine-associated immune thrombocytopenia, this review also provides the pathophysiological and clinical information necessary for correct patient management.

Treatment of chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia in patients with non-hematologic malignancies

Chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (CIT) is a common complication of the treatment of non-hematologic malignancies. Many patient-related variables (e.g., age, tumor type, number of prior chemotherapy cycles, amount of bone marrow tumor involvement) determine the extent of CIT. CIT is related to the type and dose of chemotherapy, with regimens containing gemcitabine, platinum, or temozolomide producing it most commonly. Bleeding and the need for platelet transfusions in CIT are rather uncommon except in patients with platelet counts below 25x10⁹/L in whom bleeding rates increase significantly and platelet transfusions are the only treatment. Nonetheless, platelet counts below 70x10⁹/L present a challenge. In patients with such counts, it is important to exclude other causes of thrombocytopenia (medications, infection, thrombotic microangiopathy, post-transfusion purpura, coagulopathy and immune thrombocytopenia). If these are not present, the common approach is to reduce chemotherapy dose intensity or switch to other agents. Unfortunately decreasing relative dose intensity is associated with reduced tumor response and remission rates. Thrombopoietic growth factors (recombinant human thrombopoietin, pegylated human megakaryocyte growth and development factor, romiplostim, eltrombopag, avatrombopag and hetrombopag) improve pretreatment and nadir platelet counts, reduce the need for platelet transfusions, and enable chemotherapy dose intensity to be maintained. National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines permit their use but their widespread adoption awaits adequate phase III randomized, placebo-controlled studies demonstrating maintenance of relative dose intensity, reduction of platelet transfusions and bleeding, and possibly improved survival. Their potential appropriate use also depends on consensus by the oncology community as to what constitutes an appropriate pretreatment platelet count as well as identification of patient-related and treatment variables that might predict bleeding.

A multicenter phase II study on the efficacy and safety of hetrombopag in patients with severe aplastic anemia refractory to immunosuppressive therapy

Background:

In this single-arm phase II study (NCT03557099), we evaluated the efficacy and safety of hetrombopag, a small molecule thrombopoietin (TPO) receptor agonist, in patients with severe aplastic anemia (SAA) who were refractory to standard first-line immunosuppressive therapy (IST).

Methods:

SAA patients who were refractory to standard first-line IST were given hetrombopag orally at an initial dose of 7.5 mg once daily to a maximum of 15 mg once daily, for a total of 52 weeks. The primary endpoint was proportion of patients achieving hematologic responses in ⩾1 lineage at week 18.

Results:

A total of 55 eligible patients were enrolled and received hetrombopag treatment. This study met its primary endpoint, with 23 [41.8%, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 28.7–55.9] patients achieving hematologic response in ⩾1 lineage at week 18 after initiation of hetrombopag treatment. Twenty-four (43.6%, 95% CI = 30.3–57.7) and 27 (49.1%, 95% CI = 35.4–62.9) of the 55 patients responded in ⩾1 lineage at weeks 24 and 52, respectively. Median time to initial hematologic response was 7.9 weeks (range = 2.0–32.1). The responses were durable, with a 12-month relapse-free survival rate of 82.2% (95% CI = 62.2–92.2). Adverse events occurred in 54 (98.2%) patients, and 28 (50.9%) patients had treatment-related adverse events. Seventeen (30.9%) patients had adverse events of grade ⩾3. Serious adverse events occurred in 15 (27.3%) patients and three deaths (5.5%) were reported.

Conclusion:

Hetrombopag showed encouraging efficacy with durable hematologic responses in patients with SAA who were refractory to IST. Hetrombopag was well tolerant and safe for long-term use.

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier:

NCT03557099

Dose tapering to withdrawal stage and long-term efficacy and safety of hetrombopag for the treatment of immune thrombocytopenia: Results from an open-label extension study

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of hetrombopag in Chinese patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) has been demonstrated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, phase III trial (NCT03222843).

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to report comprehensive data on a ≤6-week dose tapering to withdrawal (Stage 3) and an additional 24-week long-term extension period (Stage 4) in this phase III trial.

PATIENTS/METHODS

Patients who fulfilled the screening criteria were eligible to enter Stage 3 or 4. During Stage 3, hetrombopag was gradually tapered to withdrawal. During Stage 4, hetrombopag treatment was initiated at 2.5, 3.75, 5, or 7.5 mg once daily. The efficacy endpoints during Stage 3 or 4 and the safety profile during the entire treatment period were reported.

RESULTS

Among 194 patients who entered Stage 3, 171 (88.1%) relapsed. The median time to the first relapse since the start of Stage 3 was 15.0 days (95% CI, 14.0-16.0). In Stage 4, 144 (42.5%) patients responded at ≥75% of their assessments and 254 (74.9%) patients achieved platelet count ≥30 × 109 /L at least once, which was at least twice their baseline platelet count in the hetrombopag group (n = 339). The most common adverse events were upper respiratory tract infection (53.1%), thrombocytopenia (27.1%), and urinary tract infection (21.2%) in the hetrombopag group.

CONCLUSION

The majority of patients who experienced dose tapering to withdrawal experienced a relapse. Long-term treatment with hetrombopag was effective in increasing and maintaining platelet count within the desired range in Chinese adults with ITP. Hetrombopag was well tolerated.

Novel therapies for immune thrombocytopenia

Current therapies for immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) are successful in providing a haemostatic platelet count in over two-thirds of patients. Still, some patients have an inadequate response and there is a need for other therapies. A number of novel therapies for ITP are currently being developed based upon the current pathophysiology of ITP. Many therapies are targetted at reducing platelet destruction by decreasing anti-platelet antibody production by immunosuppression with monoclonal antibodies targetted against CD40, CD38 and the immunoproteasome or physically reducing the anti-platelet antibody concentration by inhibition of the neonatal Fc receptor. Others target the phagocytic system by inhibiting FcγR function with staphylococcal protein A, hypersialylated IgG, polymeric Fc fragments, or Bruton kinase. With a recognition that platelet destruction is also mediated by complement, inhibitors of C1s are also being tested. Inhibition of platelet desialylation may also play a role. Other novel therapies promote platelet production with new oral thrombopoietin receptor agonists or the use of low-level laser light to improve mitochondrial activity and prevent megakaryocyte apoptosis. This review will focus on these novel mechanisms for treating ITP and assess the status of treatments currently under development. Successful new treatments for ITP might also provide a pathway to treat other autoimmune disorders.