1
|
Kalbe E, Folkerts AK, Witt K, Buhmann C, Liepelt-Scarfone I. German Society of Neurology guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of cognitive impairment and affective disorders in people with Parkinson's disease: new spotlights on diagnostic procedures and non-pharmacological interventions. J Neurol 2024; 271:7330-7357. [PMID: 39120709 PMCID: PMC11561078 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-024-12503-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2024] [Revised: 06/03/2024] [Accepted: 06/07/2024] [Indexed: 08/10/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Cognitive impairment and dementia as well as affective disorders are common and debilitating syndromes that develop in people with Parkinson's disease (PwPD). The authors summarized recommendations for the 2023 updated German guidelines on "Parkinson's disease" from the German Neurological Society (DGN), focusing on the diagnosis and treatment of these disorders. METHODS The recommendations were based on literature reviews, other relevant guidelines, and expert opinions. RESULTS Measurements to assess cognitive and affective states were reviewed for psychometric properties, use in routine clinical practice, and availability in German. To improve mild cognitive impairment, cognitive training and physical aerobic training are recommended. To treat Parkinson's disease (PD)-related dementia, cognitive stimulation (as a non-pharmacological intervention) and acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AChEIs, i.e., rivastigmine) are recommended. Cognitive behavioral therapy is recommended to treat depression, anxiety, and fear of progression. Physical interventions are recommended to treat depression, fatigue, and apathy. Optimized dopaminergic treatment is the first-line pharmacological strategy recommended to manage depression, apathy, anhedonia, fatigue, and mood swings. Major depression can be additionally treated using venlafaxine or desipramine, while moderate depression can be treated pharmacologically according to its clinical phenotype (psychomotor retardation or agitation) and comorbidities (e.g., sleep disturbances, pain). Venlafaxine and nortriptyline can be used to treat anhedonia, while citalopram can be used for anxiety. CONCLUSIONS In addition to the updated pharmacological treatment options, new insights into recommendations for standardized diagnostics and non-pharmacological interventions were provided for the German health care system. However, more studies are needed to explore the full potential of non-pharmacological interventions to treat and prevent cognitive impairment and affective disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elke Kalbe
- Medical Psychology | Neuropsychology and Gender Studies & Center for Neuropsychological Diagnostics and Intervention (CeNDI), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
| | - Ann-Kristin Folkerts
- Medical Psychology | Neuropsychology and Gender Studies & Center for Neuropsychological Diagnostics and Intervention (CeNDI), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Karsten Witt
- Department of Neurology, School of Medicine and Health Science, Carl Von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
- Research Center of Neurosensory Science, Carl Von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
- Department of Neurology, Evangelical Hospital, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Carsten Buhmann
- Department of Neurology, University Clinic Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Inga Liepelt-Scarfone
- Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Department of Neurodegenerative Diseases, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Tübingen, Germany
- IB-Hochschule, Stuttgart, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cooke A, Hindle J, Lawrence C, Bellomo E, Pritchard AW, MacLeod CA, Martin-Forbes P, Jones S, Bracewell M, Linden DEJ, Mehler DMA. Effects of home-based EEG neurofeedback training as a non-pharmacological intervention for Parkinson's disease. Neurophysiol Clin 2024; 54:102997. [PMID: 38991470 DOI: 10.1016/j.neucli.2024.102997] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2024] [Revised: 06/12/2024] [Accepted: 06/12/2024] [Indexed: 07/13/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Aberrant movement-related cortical activity has been linked to impaired motor function in Parkinson's disease (PD). Dopaminergic drug treatment can restore these, but dosages and long-term treatment are limited by adverse side-effects. Effective non-pharmacological treatments could help reduce reliance on drugs. This experiment reports the first study of home-based electroencephalographic (EEG) neurofeedback training as a non-pharmacological candidate treatment for PD. Our primary aim was to test the feasibility of our EEG neurofeedback intervention in a home setting. METHODS Sixteen people with PD received six home visits comprising symptomology self-reports, a standardised motor assessment, and a precision handgrip force production task while EEG was recorded (visits 1, 2 and 6); and 3 × 1-hr EEG neurofeedback training sessions to supress the EEG mu rhythm before initiating handgrip movements (visits 3 to 5). RESULTS Participants successfully learned to self-regulate mu activity, and this appeared to expedite the initiation of precision movements (i.e., time to reach target handgrip force off-medication pre-intervention = 628 ms, off-medication post-intervention = 564 ms). There was no evidence of wider symptomology reduction (e.g., Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part III Motor Examination, off-medication pre-intervention = 29.00, off-medication post intervention = 30.07). Interviews indicated that the intervention was well-received. CONCLUSION Based on the significant effect of neurofeedback on movement-related cortical activity, positive qualitative reports from participants, and a suggestive benefit to movement initiation, we conclude that home-based neurofeedback for people with PD is a feasible and promising non-pharmacological treatment that warrants further research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Cooke
- Instutute for the Psychology of Elite Performance (IPEP), Bangor University, UK; School of Psychology and Sport Science, Bangor University, UK.
| | - John Hindle
- The Centre for Research in Ageing and Cognitive Health (REACH), University of Exeter, UK; University of Exeter Medical School, UK
| | - Catherine Lawrence
- Centre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation (CHEME), Bangor University, UK; School of Health Sciences, Bangor University, UK
| | - Eduardo Bellomo
- Instutute for the Psychology of Elite Performance (IPEP), Bangor University, UK
| | | | - Catherine A MacLeod
- Centre for Population Health Sciences, Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, UK
| | | | | | - Martyn Bracewell
- School of Psychology and Sport Science, Bangor University, UK; North Wales Medical School, Bangor University, UK; Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - David E J Linden
- School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, The Netherlands; Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), School of Psychology, Cardiff University, UK; MRC Center for Neuropsychiatric Genetics and Genomics, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, UK
| | - David M A Mehler
- Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), School of Psychology, Cardiff University, UK; MRC Center for Neuropsychiatric Genetics and Genomics, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, UK; Division of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, UK; Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Medical School, RWTH Aachen University, Germany; Institute for Translational Psychiatry, University Hospital Münster, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ferraiolo M, Hermans E. The complex molecular pharmacology of the dopamine D 2 receptor: Implications for pramipexole, ropinirole, and rotigotine. Pharmacol Ther 2023; 245:108392. [PMID: 36958527 DOI: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2023.108392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2022] [Revised: 03/09/2023] [Accepted: 03/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/25/2023]
Abstract
With L-DOPA, dopamine agonists such as pramipexole, ropinirole and rotigotine constitute key therapeutic options for the management of motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease. These compounds exert their beneficial effect on motor behaviours by activating dopamine D2-class receptors and thereby compensating for the declining dopaminergic transmission in the dorsal striatum. Despite a strong similarity in their mechanism of action, these three dopamine agonists present distinct clinical profiles, putatively underpinned by differences in their pharmacological properties. In this context, this review aims at contributing to close the gap between clinical observations and data from molecular neuropharmacology by exploring the properties of pramipexole, ropinirole and rotigotine from both the clinical and molecular perspectives. Indeed, this review first summarizes and compares the clinical features of these three dopamine agonists, and then explores their binding profiles at the different dopamine receptor subtypes. Moreover, the signalling profiles of pramipexole, ropinirole and rotigotine at the D2 receptor are recapitulated, with a focus on biased signalling and the potential therapeutic implications. Overall, this review aims at providing a unifying framework of interpretation for both clinicians and fundamental pharmacologists interested in a deep understanding of the pharmacological properties of pramipexole, ropinirole and rotigotine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mattia Ferraiolo
- Neuropharmacology Laboratory, Institute of Neuroscience, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Emmanuel Hermans
- Neuropharmacology Laboratory, Institute of Neuroscience, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kulisevsky J, Martínez-Horta S, Campolongo A, Pascual-Sedano B, Marín-Lahoz J, Bejr-kasem H, Aracil-Bolaños I, Horta-Barba A, Puig-Davi A, Pagonabarraga J. A Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Effects of Safinamide on Apathetic Non-demented Patients With Parkinson's Disease. Front Neurol 2022; 13:866502. [PMID: 35720066 PMCID: PMC9201638 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.866502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2022] [Accepted: 05/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundApathy is highly prevalent and disabling in Parkinson's disease (PD). Pharmacological options for its management lack sufficient evidence.ObjectiveWe studied the effects of safinamide on apathy in PD.MethodsProspective, 24-week, two-site, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group exploratory study in non-demented PD on stable dopaminergic therapy randomized 1:1 to adjunct safinamide (50 mg/day for 2 weeks and 100 mg/day for 22 weeks) or placebo. The primary endpoint was the mean change from baseline to week 24 on the Apathy Scale (AS) total score. Secondary endpoints included changes in cognition, activities of daily living, motor scores, the impression of change, and safety and tolerability measures.ResultsIn total, 30 participants (active treatment = 15; placebo = 15; 80% showing clinically significant apathetic symptoms according to the AS) were enrolled, and included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Change in AS (ANOVA) showed a trend to significance [p = 0.059] mediated by a more marked decrease in AS score with safinamide (−7.5 ± 6.9) than with placebo (−2.8 ± 5.7). Post-hoc analysis (paired t-test) showed a significant positive change in the AS score between 12-week and 24-week [p = 0.001] only in the active group. No significant or trend changes were found for any of the secondary outcome variables. Adverse events were few and only mild in both treatment groups.ConclusionsSafinamide was safe and well-tolerated, but failed to provide evidence of improved apathy. The positive trend observed in the post-hoc analyses deserves to be studied in depth in larger studies.Trial RegistrationEudraCT 2017-003254-17.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaime Kulisevsky
- Movement Disorders Unit, Neurology Department, Sant Pau Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
- Medicine Department, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (U.A.B.), Barcelona, Spain
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques- Sant Pau (IIB-Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación en Red-Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas (CIBERNED), Cáceres, Spain
- Neurology Department—Hospital Quirón Dexeus—Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (UOC), Barcelona, Spain
- *Correspondence: Jaime Kulisevsky
| | - Saul Martínez-Horta
- Movement Disorders Unit, Neurology Department, Sant Pau Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
- Medicine Department, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (U.A.B.), Barcelona, Spain
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques- Sant Pau (IIB-Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación en Red-Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas (CIBERNED), Cáceres, Spain
| | - Antonia Campolongo
- Movement Disorders Unit, Neurology Department, Sant Pau Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
- Medicine Department, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (U.A.B.), Barcelona, Spain
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques- Sant Pau (IIB-Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación en Red-Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas (CIBERNED), Cáceres, Spain
- Neurology Department—Hospital Quirón Dexeus—Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (UOC), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Berta Pascual-Sedano
- Movement Disorders Unit, Neurology Department, Sant Pau Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
- Medicine Department, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (U.A.B.), Barcelona, Spain
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques- Sant Pau (IIB-Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación en Red-Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas (CIBERNED), Cáceres, Spain
- Neurology Department—Hospital Quirón Dexeus—Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (UOC), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Juan Marín-Lahoz
- Movement Disorders Unit, Neurology Department, Sant Pau Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Helena Bejr-kasem
- Movement Disorders Unit, Neurology Department, Sant Pau Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
- Medicine Department, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (U.A.B.), Barcelona, Spain
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques- Sant Pau (IIB-Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación en Red-Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas (CIBERNED), Cáceres, Spain
| | - Ignacio Aracil-Bolaños
- Movement Disorders Unit, Neurology Department, Sant Pau Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
- Medicine Department, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (U.A.B.), Barcelona, Spain
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques- Sant Pau (IIB-Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación en Red-Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas (CIBERNED), Cáceres, Spain
| | - Andrea Horta-Barba
- Movement Disorders Unit, Neurology Department, Sant Pau Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
- Medicine Department, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (U.A.B.), Barcelona, Spain
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques- Sant Pau (IIB-Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación en Red-Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas (CIBERNED), Cáceres, Spain
| | - Arnau Puig-Davi
- Movement Disorders Unit, Neurology Department, Sant Pau Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
- Medicine Department, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (U.A.B.), Barcelona, Spain
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques- Sant Pau (IIB-Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Javier Pagonabarraga
- Movement Disorders Unit, Neurology Department, Sant Pau Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
- Medicine Department, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (U.A.B.), Barcelona, Spain
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques- Sant Pau (IIB-Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación en Red-Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas (CIBERNED), Cáceres, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Neuropsychiatric Symptoms in Clinically Defined Parkinson’s Disease: An Updated Review of Literature. Behav Neurol 2022; 2022:1213393. [PMID: 35586201 PMCID: PMC9110237 DOI: 10.1155/2022/1213393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2022] [Revised: 02/22/2022] [Accepted: 03/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) are a common and potentially serious manifestation of Parkinson's disease (PD) but are frequently overlooked in favor of a focus on motor symptomatology. Here, we conducted a literature review of the prevalence and type of NPS experienced by PD patients with a clinically defined course of their illness. Methods We identified reports of NPS in patients with PD and mean disease duration over 3 years. Three databases—PubMed, Scopus, and Dialnet—were searched for relevant literature published between 2010 and 2020. Predefined exclusion criteria were applied prior to a descriptive analysis of the literature base. Results In all, 87 unique reports were identified and 30 met inclusion and exclusion criteria. These included 7142 patients with PD (male: 67.3%; mean age: 66.2 years; mean disease duration: 6.7 years). The most frequent NPS were mood disorders (apathy, depression, and anxiety), psychosis, and impulse control disorders (ICD). Treatment with dopamine agonists was identified as an important risk factor for ICD. Co-occurrence of NPS and cognitive dysfunction was also evidenced in a number of studies. Patients with more significant cognitive deficits and higher levels of NPS appeared to be of older age with a longer disease duration and to have more severe motor symptoms. Conclusions NPS, most commonly mood disorders (apathy, depression, and anxiety), psychosis, and ICDs are frequent manifestations of PD. The results of this review reflect the need to develop unified validated assessment protocols for NPS in PD, as well as to improve their management in clinical practice.
Collapse
|
6
|
Fahed M, Steffens DC. Apathy: Neurobiology, Assessment and Treatment. CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY AND NEUROSCIENCE : THE OFFICIAL SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN COLLEGE OF NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY 2021; 19:181-189. [PMID: 33888648 PMCID: PMC8077060 DOI: 10.9758/cpn.2021.19.2.181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2021] [Revised: 03/09/2021] [Accepted: 03/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Apathy is a highly prevalent, disabling and treatment resistant syndrome. It is defined as a quantitative reduction of goal- directed activity in comparison to the patient’s previous level of in multiple dimensions including behavior/cognition, emotion and social interaction. It has been described in major depressive disorder, Alzheimer’s disease, frontotemporal dementia, Parkinson’s Disease, cerebrovascular disease, and vascular dementia, among others. This review will address the neuropsychology and associated neurobiological underpinnings of apathy in the above conditions, identify specific methods to assess apathy clinically, and review the literature on managing apathy across these various disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario Fahed
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Connecticut, School of Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA
| | - David C Steffens
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Connecticut, School of Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Stocchi F, Fossati B, Torti M. Safety considerations when using non-ergot dopamine agonists to treat Parkinson's disease. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2020; 19:1155-1172. [PMID: 32869676 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2020.1804550] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Nonergot dopamine agonists (NEDA) represent an excellent treatment option for Parkinson's disease (PD) patients, in both early and advanced stages of the disease. The post-marketing phase of NEDA has highlighted, though, the occurrence of important long-term adverse events. AREAS COVERED This review reports recent updates on NEDA adverse events, analyzing neurobiological bases and risk factors of these complications. A literature search has been performed using Medline and reviewing the bibliographies of selected articles. EXPERT OPINION NEDA represents a very important option in the treatment of PD. Criticisms on their use can be overcome through a better knowledge of these molecules and of the risk factors for adverse events which allow specialists to prevent the occurrence of undesired complications and consent a tailor-based approach. Abbreviations: PD: Parkinson's disease, DA: dopamine agonists, NEDA: non-ergot dopamine agonists, ICD: impulse control disorders, DAWS: dopamine agonist withdrawal syndrome, CYP: Cytochrome P, PK: pharmacokinetic, AUC: area under the curve, HRT: hormone replacement therapy, AV: atrioventricular, HF: heart failure, OH: orthostatic hypotension, RBD: REM behavior disorders, PDP: Parkinson's disease psychosis, DRT: dopamine replacement therapy, DDS: dopamine dysregulation syndrome, MMSE: Mini-Mental state examination, EDS: excessive daytime somnolence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabrizio Stocchi
- Neurology, Institute for Research and Medical Care IRCCS San Raffaele Pisana , Rome, Italy.,Neurology, San Raffaele University , Rome, Italy
| | - Barbara Fossati
- Department of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, Casa Di Cura Privata Del Policlinico , Milano, Italy
| | - Margherita Torti
- Neurology, Institute for Research and Medical Care IRCCS San Raffaele Pisana , Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Cerri S, Blandini F. An update on the use of non-ergot dopamine agonists for the treatment of Parkinson's disease. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2020; 21:2279-2291. [PMID: 32804544 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2020.1805432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Long-term treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD) with levodopa is hampered by motor complications related to the inability of residual nigrostriatal neurons to convert levodopa to dopamine (DA) and use it appropriately. This generated a tendency to postpone levodopa, favoring the initial use of DA agonists, which directly stimulate striatal dopaminergic receptors. Use of DA agonists, however, is associated with multiple side effects and their efficacy is limited by suboptimal bioavailability. AREAS COVERED This paper reviewed the latest preclinical and clinical findings on the efficacy and adverse effects of non-ergot DA agonists, discussing the present and future of this class of compounds in PD therapy. EXPERT OPINION The latest findings confirm the effectiveness of DA agonists as initial treatment or adjunctive therapy to levodopa in advanced PD, but a more conservative approach to their use is emerging, due to the complexity and repercussions of their side effects. As various factors may increase the individual risk to side effects, assessing such risk and calibrating the use of DA agonists accordingly may become extremely important in the clinical management of PD, as well as the availability of new DA agonists with better profiles of safety and efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvia Cerri
- Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology, IRCCS Mondino Foundation , Pavia, Italy
| | - Fabio Blandini
- Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology, IRCCS Mondino Foundation , Pavia, Italy.,Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia , Pavia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lazcano-Ocampo C, Wan YM, van Wamelen DJ, Batzu L, Boura I, Titova N, Leta V, Qamar M, Martinez-Martin P, Ray Chaudhuri K. Identifying and responding to fatigue and apathy in Parkinson’s disease: a review of current practice. Expert Rev Neurother 2020; 20:477-495. [DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2020.1752669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Lazcano-Ocampo
- King’s College London, Department of Neurosciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, De Crespigny Park, London, UK
- Parkinson’s Foundation Centre of Excellence, King’s College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, UK
- Department of Neurology, Hospital Sotero Del Rio, Santiago, Chile
| | - Yi Min Wan
- King’s College London, Department of Neurosciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, De Crespigny Park, London, UK
- Parkinson’s Foundation Centre of Excellence, King’s College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, UK
- Department of Psychiatry, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Daniel J van Wamelen
- King’s College London, Department of Neurosciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, De Crespigny Park, London, UK
- Parkinson’s Foundation Centre of Excellence, King’s College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, UK
- Cognition and Behaviour; Department of Neurology; Nijmegen, Radboud University Medical Centre; Donders Institute for Brain, The Netherlands
| | - Lucia Batzu
- King’s College London, Department of Neurosciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, De Crespigny Park, London, UK
- Parkinson’s Foundation Centre of Excellence, King’s College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, UK
| | - Iro Boura
- King’s College London, Department of Neurosciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, De Crespigny Park, London, UK
- Parkinson’s Foundation Centre of Excellence, King’s College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, UK
| | - Nataliya Titova
- Department of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Medical Genetics, Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education «N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University» of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
| | - Valentina Leta
- King’s College London, Department of Neurosciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, De Crespigny Park, London, UK
- Parkinson’s Foundation Centre of Excellence, King’s College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, UK
| | - Mubasher Qamar
- King’s College London, Department of Neurosciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, De Crespigny Park, London, UK
- Parkinson’s Foundation Centre of Excellence, King’s College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, UK
- Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother Hospital, East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust, Margate, UK
| | - Pablo Martinez-Martin
- Center for Networked Biomedical Research in Neurodegenerative Diseases (CIBERNED), Carlos III Institute of Health. Madrid, Spain
| | - K Ray Chaudhuri
- King’s College London, Department of Neurosciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, De Crespigny Park, London, UK
- Parkinson’s Foundation Centre of Excellence, King’s College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Neuropsychiatric aspects of Parkinson disease psychopharmacology: Insights from circuit dynamics. HANDBOOK OF CLINICAL NEUROLOGY 2020; 165:83-121. [PMID: 31727232 DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-444-64012-3.00007-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Parkinson disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder with a complex pathophysiology characterized by the progressive loss of dopaminergic neurons within the substantia nigra. Persons with PD experience several motoric and neuropsychiatric symptoms. Neuropsychiatric features of PD include depression, anxiety, psychosis, impulse control disorders, and apathy. In this chapter, we will utilize the National Institutes of Mental Health Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) to frame and integrate observations from two prevailing disease constructions: neurotransmitter anomalies and circuit physiology. When there is available evidence, we posit how unified translational observations may have clinical relevance and postulate importance outside of PD. Finally, we review the limited evidence available for pharmacologic management of these symptoms.
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
Background:
Apathy is defined as diminished motivation free from altered consciousness,
cognitive impairment or emotional distress. It is a prevalent syndrome in different disorders,
which share brain system alterations despite very different underlying pathologies. However, to
date, little research has be en devoted to the subject.
Aim:
To review the concept of apathy and clarify its aetiology, structural and functional neural
bases and treatment options.
Methods:
Literature search and review, with “apathy” as a term, using all main databases (Medline,
Psychinfo, Cochrane) included in our organization’s (RSMB; Osakidetza/Basque Health Service)
Ovid search engine, together with a manual search of relevant papers.
Results:
The literature reviewed shows that apathy is a multi-dimensional clinical construct with a
current definition and validated diagnostic criteria. It is a prevalent condition across an array of different
brain disorders, which share a common pathology, namely dysfunction of the fronto-striatal
circuitry, specially affecting the 1) anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), 2) ventral striatum (VS) and 3)
nucleus accumbens (N. Acc.). Different theories have emerged regarding the role of the ACC in the
genesis of apathy. The neuromodulator dopamine is heavily implicated in 1- ACC, 2- VS, 3- in particulat
the N. Acc., and 4- the genesis of apathy, although other neurotransmitters could also be
involved to a lesser degree. There is a patent lack of RCTs on the efficiency of current therapeutic options.
Conclusion:
Further research is needed to help understand the functional neuroanatomy, neuromodulators
involved and possible treatment options of this clinical construct.
Collapse
|
12
|
Cools R, Froböse M, Aarts E, Hofmans L. Dopamine and the motivation of cognitive control. HANDBOOK OF CLINICAL NEUROLOGY 2019; 163:123-143. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-804281-6.00007-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
|
13
|
|
14
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Non-motor symptoms in patients with Parkinson's Disease (PD) are better predictors of quality of life changes, caregiver burden, and mortality than motor symptoms. Levodopa has limited, and sometimes detrimental, effects on these symptoms. In this review we discuss recent evidence on pharmacological treatments for non-motor symptoms. RECENT FINDINGS Breakthroughs have been made in the treatment of psychosis and sleep dysfunction. Pimavanserin has become the first FDA approved drug for PD psychosis. There is also new research supporting cholinesterase inhibitors for sleep disorders in PD. Other studies, including several novel treatments, have shown mixed results for apathy, depression, and fatigue. SUMMARY Further research is needed to develop treatments for non-motor symptoms in PD. Preclinical and postmortem studies indicate that non-motor symptoms in PD may arise from pathology in non-dopamine systems. Although sometimes used off-label, therapies that target such systems have been under-utilized in treating non-motor symptoms and warrant further clinical investigation.
Collapse
|
15
|
Laurencin C, Danaila T, Broussolle E, Thobois S. Initial treatment of Parkinson's disease in 2016: The 2000 consensus conference revisited. Rev Neurol (Paris) 2016; 172:512-523. [PMID: 27476416 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurol.2016.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2016] [Accepted: 07/08/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
In 2000, a French consensus conference proposed guidelines for the treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD). Since then, new drugs have been concocted, new studies have been published and clinicians have become aware of some drug-induced adverse effects that were little known in the past. This has led us to reconsider the recommendations published 16 years ago. Thus, the aim of the present review is to present the recent data related to the different medications and non-pharmacological approaches available for PD, with a special focus on early-stage PD. Levodopa (LD), dopamine agonists (DAs), catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitors (COMT-Is), anticholinergics, monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOB-Is) and amantadine have been considered, and their efficacy and safety for both motor as well as non-motor aspects are reported here. This has led to our proposal for a revised therapeutic strategy for the initiation of treatment in newly diagnosed PD patients, based on the available literature and the relative benefits/side effects balance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Laurencin
- Service de neurologie C, hôpital neurologique Pierre-Wertheimer, hospices civils de Lyon, 59, boulevard Pinel, 69677 Lyon/Bron, France; Faculté de médecine et de maïeutique Lyon Sud Charles-Mérieux, université de Lyon, université Claude-Bernard Lyon I, Lyon, France.
| | - T Danaila
- Service de neurologie C, hôpital neurologique Pierre-Wertheimer, hospices civils de Lyon, 59, boulevard Pinel, 69677 Lyon/Bron, France
| | - E Broussolle
- Service de neurologie C, hôpital neurologique Pierre-Wertheimer, hospices civils de Lyon, 59, boulevard Pinel, 69677 Lyon/Bron, France; CNRS, UMR 5229, institut des sciences cognitives Marc-Jeannerod, 69500 Bron, France; Faculté de médecine et de maïeutique Lyon Sud Charles-Mérieux, université de Lyon, université Claude-Bernard Lyon I, Lyon, France
| | - S Thobois
- Service de neurologie C, hôpital neurologique Pierre-Wertheimer, hospices civils de Lyon, 59, boulevard Pinel, 69677 Lyon/Bron, France; CNRS, UMR 5229, institut des sciences cognitives Marc-Jeannerod, 69500 Bron, France; Faculté de médecine et de maïeutique Lyon Sud Charles-Mérieux, université de Lyon, université Claude-Bernard Lyon I, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hauser RA, Slawek J, Barone P, Dohin E, Surmann E, Asgharnejad M, Bauer L. Evaluation of rotigotine transdermal patch for the treatment of apathy and motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease. BMC Neurol 2016; 16:90. [PMID: 27267880 PMCID: PMC4895976 DOI: 10.1186/s12883-016-0610-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2015] [Accepted: 05/24/2016] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background This multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study assessed the efficacy of rotigotine transdermal patch on apathy and motor symptoms in patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD). Methods Patients with PD-associated apathy (Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale [UPDRS] I item 4 [motivation] ≥2 and patient-rated Apathy Scale [AS] ≥14) were randomized 1:1:1 to “low-dose” rotigotine (≤6 mg/24 h for early PD [those not receiving levodopa] or ≤8 mg/24 h for advanced PD [those receiving levodopa]), “high-dose” rotigotine (≤8 mg/24 h for early PD or ≤16 mg/24 h for advanced PD), or placebo, and maintained at optimal/maximal dose for 12 weeks. Coprimary efficacy variables were: change from baseline to End of Maintenance in patient-rated AS and UPDRS II + III total score. Recruitment was stopped after an interim futility analysis; therefore, all p values are exploratory. Results Of 122 patients randomized, 81.1 % completed the study (placebo, n = 32/40 [80.0 %]; low-dose rotigotine, n = 30/41 [73.2 %]; high-dose rotigotine, n = 37/41 [90.2 %]). No treatment difference was observed in the change in patient-rated AS (least squares mean [95 % confidence interval (CI)] difference: low-dose, 0.04 [−2.42, 2.50], p =0.977; high-dose, −0.22 [−2.61, 2.18], p = 0.859). Rotigotine improved UPDRS II + III total scores versus placebo (least squares mean [95 % CI] treatment difference: low-dose, −7.29 [−12.30, −2.28], p = 0.005; high-dose, −6.06 [−10.90, −1.21], p = 0.015), and the “mood/apathy” domain of the Non-Motor Symptom Scale as rated by the investigator (secondary outcome). The most frequent adverse events in rotigotine-treated patients were application site reactions, somnolence, and nausea. Conclusions Rotigotine did not improve PD-associated apathy as rated by the patient but provided clinically relevant improvement in motor control and activities of daily living. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01782222. Trial registration date: January 30, 2013. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12883-016-0610-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert A Hauser
- Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders Center, USF Health - Byrd Institute, National Parkinson Foundation Center of Excellence, Tampa, FL, USA.
| | - Jaroslaw Slawek
- Department of Neurological-Psychiatric Nursing, Medical University of Gdańsk and Department of Neurology, St Adalbert Hospital, Gdańsk, Poland
| | - Paolo Barone
- Neurodegenerative Disease Center, University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ceravolo R, Rossi C, Del Prete E, Bonuccelli U. A review of adverse events linked to dopamine agonists in the treatment of Parkinson's disease. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2016; 15:181-98. [PMID: 26646536 DOI: 10.1517/14740338.2016.1130128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Dopamine agonists are highly effective as adjunctive therapy to levodopa in advanced Parkinson's disease. These drugs have rapidly gained popularity as a monotherapy in the early stages of Parkinson's disease for patients less than 65-70 years old since they are about as effective as levodopa but patients demonstrate a lower tendency to develop motor complications. However, dopamine agonists could have peripheral and central side-effects which are often the reason for the discontinuation of the treatment. AREAS COVERED This article presents an overview of the efficacy and the potential negative effects related to the use of dopamine agonists in the treatment of Parkinson's disease. EXPERT OPINION Beyond the new generation non ergot dopamine agonists, no strong evidences allow the choice of a specific dopamine agonists for Parkinson 's disease treatment and by now dopamine agonists treatment should be tailored on specific adverse events profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Ceravolo
- a Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine , University of Pisa , Pisa , Italy.,b Department of Neurosciences, Neurology Unit , AOU-Pisa , Pisa , Italy
| | - Carlo Rossi
- a Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine , University of Pisa , Pisa , Italy.,b Department of Neurosciences, Neurology Unit , AOU-Pisa , Pisa , Italy
| | - Eleonora Del Prete
- a Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine , University of Pisa , Pisa , Italy.,b Department of Neurosciences, Neurology Unit , AOU-Pisa , Pisa , Italy
| | - Ubaldo Bonuccelli
- a Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine , University of Pisa , Pisa , Italy.,b Department of Neurosciences, Neurology Unit , AOU-Pisa , Pisa , Italy
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
The role of dopamine in the pathophysiology and treatment of apathy. PROGRESS IN BRAIN RESEARCH 2016; 229:389-426. [DOI: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2016.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
|