Prevalence of Potential and Clinically Relevant Statin-Drug Interactions in Frail and Robust Older Inpatients

Prevalence and health outcomes of polypharmacy and hyperpolypharmacy in older adults with frailty: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Polypharmacy is a prevalent issue in older adults, associated with a wide range of adverse health outcomes, amplified in those with frailty. This review aims to synthesize current literature on the prevalence and health outcomes of polypharmacy and hyperpolypharmacy in older adults with frailty. A systematic search was carried out within ten databases till December 2021. Data was extracted using a piloted data extraction form, and methodological quality was assessed using JBI critical appraisal checklists. Meta-analyses were conducted for prevalence, and narrative synthesis was conducted for the health outcomes of polypharmacy and hyperpolypharmacy in older adults with frailty. Heterogeneity was assessed using Chi² and I² statistics, with sensitivity and subgroup analyses performed to explore sources of heterogeneity. Sixty-six studies were included for this review. The overall pooled prevalence of polypharmacy and hyperpolypharmacy was 59% and 22% respectively. When stratifying the studies by setting, WHO regions, in eighteen frailty assessment instruments, and by its year of publication, subgroup analysis found the highest rates of prevalence in the hospital setting (71%), in the European region (68%), when Reported Edmonton Frail Scale was used (96%), and in studies published in 2015 (86%). Additionally, frail older adults with polypharmacy were less likely to experience an improvement in frailty states, had higher risks of mortality, were more likely to suffer adverse hospital-related outcomes, and required additional assistance compared to those without polypharmacy. Therefore, the high prevalence and poorer health outcomes urges the healthcare providers and health policymakers to develop and implement preventative and restorative measures targeted at the adverse outcomes associated with polypharmacy and hyperpolypharmacy in older adults with frailty.

The prevalence of frailty and pre-frailty among geriatric hospital inpatients and its association with economic prosperity and healthcare expenditure: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 467,779 geriatric hospital inpatients

BACKGROUND

Frailty is a common and clinically significant condition among geriatric populations. Although well-evidenced pooled estimates of the prevalence of frailty exist within various settings and populations, presently there are none assessing the overall prevalence of frailty among geriatric hospital inpatients. The purpose of this review was to systematically search and analyse the prevalence of frailty among geriatric hospital inpatients within the literature and examine its associations with national economic indicators.

METHODS

Systematic searches were conducted on Ovid, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL Plus, and the Cochrane Library, encompassing all literature published prior to 22 November 2018, supplemented with manual reference searches. Included studies utilised a validated operational definition of frailty, reported the prevalence of frailty, had a minimum age ≥ 65 years, attempted to assess the whole ward/clinical population, and occurred among hospital inpatients. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed study quality.

RESULTS

Ninety-six studies with a pooled sample of 467,779 geriatric hospital inpatients were included. The median critical appraisal score was 8/9 (range 7-9). The pooled prevalence of frailty, and pre-frailty, among geriatric hospital inpatients was 47.4% (95% CI 43.7-51.1%), and 25.8% (95% CI 22.0-29.6%), respectively. Significant differences were observed in the prevalence of frailty stratified by age, prevalent morbidity, ward type, clinical population, and operational definition. No significant differences were observed in stratified analyses by sex or continent, or significant associations between the prevalence of frailty and economic indicators.

CONCLUSIONS

Frailty is highly prevalent among geriatric hospital inpatients. High heterogeneity exists within this setting based on various clinical and demographic characteristics. Pooled estimates reported in this review place the prevalence of frailty among geriatric hospital inpatients between that reported for community-dwelling older adults and older adults in nursing homes, outlining an increase in the relative prevalence of frailty with progression through the healthcare system.

Statin (mis)use in older people: A cross-sectional study using French health insurance databases

PURPOSE

To describe the occurrence of potential statin misuse, its characteristics and associated factors in older people.

METHODS

A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted in Alsace and Lorraine (France) using French health insurance databases. Study population comprised community-dwelling patients and nursing homes residents aged 80 and over, who received at least one statin prescription between January 1, 2017 to April 30, 2017 (N = 38 268). Potential statin misuse was identified considering off-label uses, high-intensity doses, drug contraindications and statin-drug interactions.

RESULTS

At least one potential statin misuse was detected for 19 468 patients (50.9%). Off-label prescription was the most frequent misuse observed (53.6%), followed by high-intensity statin dose (30.5%). Polypharmacy (five to nine drugs) and excessive polypharmacy (10 or more drugs) were the main risk factors associated with potential statin misuse (adjusted OR = 2.6 and 4.7 respectively). Nursing home, multi-morbidity and the presence of multiple prescriptions from different doctors for the same patient were other risk factors significantly associated. Two sensitivity analyzes (reconsiderations of off-label and high statin dose definitions) revealed the same statistical trend.

CONCLUSION

Potential statin misuse is frequent in people aged 80 and over. These findings should serve as a warning to health care professionals and hopefully will contribute to ensure an appropriate and safe use of statin in aged population.

Prescription of statins and pharmacokinetic interactions in Colombian patients

Background: Statins have extensive hepatic metabolism and can have multiple pharmacological interactions. The aim was to identify the main pharmacokinetic interactions between statins and their comedications in a group of patients from Colombia.Research design and methods: A cross-sectional study of pharmacokinetic interactions in patients treated with statins who were identified from a population database. The interactions were documented using the Lexicomp® database.Results: A total of 123,026 patients with statin prescriptions were identified, with a mean age of 68.4 ± 11.5 years; 57.1% were women, and 81.6% received atorvastatin. A total of 19.4% (n = 23.831) of patients presented pharmacological interactions. Some 15,474 (12.6%) had interactions classified as category C, 7.4% (n = 9077) as category D, and 0.5% (n = 660) as category X. 36.8% of the patients with lovastatin prescriptions had some interaction. Age older than 65 years, male sex, residence in capital cities, comorbidities, endocrine pathologies and HIV were associated with an increase in the probability of having contraindicated or risky interactions.Conclusions: Important interactions between statins and other medications were more common in adults over 65 years of age and those with endocrine comorbidities or HIV infection. This knowledge should help when proposing solutions that reduce the risk of adverse reactions.

Frailty and Co-Prescribing of Potentially Interacting Drugs in New Users of Warfarin

Background

Warfarin is underutilised in frail older people because of the fear of bleeding complications. Drug interactions are an independent bleeding risk factor. However, the extent to which potential drug interactions are taken into account at warfarin therapy initiation in frail patients is not known.

Objective

The objective of this study was to investigate the use of potentially interacting drugs increasing the bleeding risk before and after warfarin initiation in frail and non-frail patients.

Methods

We conducted an observational study including inpatients aged ≥ 60 years initiated on warfarin in a tertiary hospital in Adelaide, South Australia. Frailty status was assessed with the Reported Edmonton Frail Scale. Medication charts were reviewed before and after warfarin initiation.

Results

In total, 151 patients (102 non-frail and 49 frail) were included. Before warfarin initiation, the use of clopidogrel and acetaminophen was more common in frail patients compared with non-frail patients (25.5% vs 10.2%, p = 0.0135, 63.8% vs 35.7% p = 0.0014, respectively). The use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, 9.2% in non-frail patients and 6.4% in frail patients before warfarin initiation, was completely stopped after warfarin initiation in both groups. The use of antiplatelet drugs decreased from 56.1% in non-frail patients and 66.0 % in frail patients to 12.2% and 14.9%, respectively. Instead, the use of drugs affecting the metabolism of warfarin or vitamin K increased in both groups. No statistically significant difference was seen in the exposure to interacting drugs between study groups after warfarin initiation. Acetaminophen, senna glycosides and cytochrome P450 2C9 inhibiting drugs were the most common interacting drugs at discharge used in 49.0%, 18.4% and 20.4% of non-frail patients and 53.2%, 29.8% and 19.1% of frail patients, respectively.

Conclusions

The overall frequency of potential drug interactions was moderate and frail patients were not exposed to warfarin drug interactions more often than non-frail patients. Further studies in larger study populations are required to verify these results.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s40266-020-00755-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Discontinuation of Statins in Veterans Admitted to Nursing Homes near the End of Life

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Geriatric guidelines recommend against statin use in older adults with limited life expectancy (LLE) or advanced dementia (AD). This study examined resident and facility factors predicting statin discontinuation after nursing home (NH) admission in veterans with LLE/AD taking statins for secondary prevention.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study of Veterans Affairs (VA) bar code medication administration records, Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments, and utilization records linked to Medicare claims.

SETTING

VA NHs, known as community living centers (CLCs).

PARTICIPANTS

Veterans aged 65 and older with coronary artery disease, stroke, or diabetes mellitus, type II, admitted in fiscal years 2009 to 2015, who met criteria for LLE/AD on their admission MDS and received statins in the week after admission (n = 13,110).

MEASUREMENTS

Residents were followed until statin discontinuation (ie, gap in statin use ≥14 days), death, or censoring due to discharge, day 91 of the stay, or end of the study period. Competing risk models assessed cumulative incidence and predictors of discontinuation, stratified by whether the resident had their end-of-life (EOL) status designated or used hospice at admission.

RESULTS

Overall cumulative incidence of statin discontinuation was 31% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 30%-32%) by day 91, and it was markedly higher in those with (52%; 95% CI = 50%-55%) vs without (25%; 95% CI = 24%-26%) EOL designation/hospice. In patients with EOL designation/hospice (n = 2,374), obesity, congestive heart failure, and admission from nonhospital settings predicted decreased likelihood of discontinuation; AD, dependency in activities of daily living, greater number of medications, and geographic region predicted increased likelihood of discontinuation. In patients without EOL designation/hospice (n = 10,736), older age and several specific markers of poor prognosis predicted greater discontinuation, whereas obesity/overweight predicted decreased discontinuation.

CONCLUSION

Most veterans with LLE/AD taking statins for secondary prevention do not discontinue statins following CLC admission. Designating residents as EOL status, hospice use, and individual clinical factors indicating poor prognosis may prompt deprescribing.

Treatment of hypercholesterolaemia in older adults calls for a patient-centred approach

Due to an increasing number of older adults with (risk factors for) cardiovascular disease (CVD), the sum of older adults eligible for lipid-lowering drugs will increase. This has risen questions about benefits and harms of lipid-lowering therapy in older adults with a varying number of (cardiovascular) comorbidities and functional status. The heterogeneity in physical and functional health increases with age, leading to a much wider variety in cardiovascular risk and life expectancy than in younger adults. We suggest treatment decisions on hypercholesterolaemia in adults aged ≥75 years should shift from a strictly 10-year cardiovascular risk-driven approach to a patient-centred and lifetime benefit-based approach. With this, estimated 10-year risk of CVD should be placed into the perspective of life expectancy. Moreover, frailty and safety concerns must be taken into account for a risk–benefit discussion between clinician and patient. Based on the Dutch addendum ‘Cardiovascular Risk Management in (frail) older adults’, our approach offers more detailed information on when not to initiate or deprescribe therapy than standard guidelines. Instead of using traditional risk estimating tools which tend to overestimate risk of CVD in older adults, use a competing risk adjusted, older adults-specific risk score (available at https://u-prevent.com). By filling in a patient’s (cardiovascular) health profile (eg, cholesterol, renal function), the tool estimates risk of CVD and models the effect of medication in terms of absolute risk reduction for an individual patient. Using this tool can guide doctors and patients in making shared decisions on initiating, continuing or deprescribing lipid-lowering therapy.

Polypharmacy and Incident Frailty in a Longitudinal Community-Based Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES

Polypharmacy may affect frailty, a common and costly condition among older adults. Frailty prevalence is elevated among racial/ethnic minorities and persons living in the US South, and research is needed to inform future pharmacologic interventions in these populations. Our aim was to quantify the prevalence of frailty and polypharmacy, and to estimate the association between polypharmacy and incident frailty.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

A community-based cohort study of adults residing in Johnston County, North Carolina.

PARTICIPANTS

White and African American adults aged 50 to 95 years (n=1697).

MEASUREMENTS

At each study visit, all prescription and over-the-counter medications were recorded. We calculated annual polypharmacy (5-9 medications) and excessive polypharmacy (≥10 medications) prevalence at the 2006-2010 visit (n = 1697) and operationalized the Fried frailty phenotype to describe prevalent and incident frailty at two consecutive visits (2006-2010 and 2013-2015). We estimated risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between polypharmacy and incident frailty using weighted log-binomial regression to account for measured confounding and attrition using inverse probability of treatment and attrition weights, respectively.

RESULTS

At the 2006-2010 visit, 678 (41%) and 260 (16%) participants were exposed to polypharmacy and excessive polypharmacy, respectively. Overall, 353 (21%) participants and 180 (21%) participants were frail at the 2006-2010 and 2013-2015 visits, respectively. Frailty was more common among participants identifying as white, women, and having less educational attainment relative to those without these characteristics. Incident frailty at the 2013-2015 visit was 15% (mean follow-up = 5.5 years). Our results suggest that polypharmacy is positively associated with incident frailty (weighted RR = 1.4; 95% CI = .9-2.0), yet estimates are imprecise and should be interpreted with caution.

CONCLUSION

Consistent with the current weight of evidence, our results suggest an association between polypharmacy and incident frailty. Prospective studies evaluating deprescribing interventions are needed to clarify whether reducing polypharmacy decreases frailty incidence. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:2482-2489, 2019.

Association of polypharmacy and hyperpolypharmacy with frailty states: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To investigate: (1) the cross-sectional association between polypharmacy, hyperpolypharmacy and presence of prefrailty or frailty; (2) the risk of incident prefrailty or frailty in persons with polypharmacy, and vice versa.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. We searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase from 01/01/1998 to 5/2/2018. Pooled estimates were obtained through random effect models and Mantel-Haenszel weighting. Homogeneity was assessed with the I² statistic and publication bias with Egger's and Begg's tests.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven studies were included. The pooled proportion of polypharmacy in persons with prefrailty and frailty was 47% (95% CI 33-61) and 59% (95% CI 42-76), respectively. Increased odds ratio of polypharmacy were seen for prefrail (pooled OR = 1.52; 95% CI 1.32-1.79) and frail persons (pooled OR = 2.62, 95% CI 1.81-3.79). Hyperpolypharmacy was also increased in prefrail (OR = 1.95; 95% CI 1.41-2.70) and frail (OR = 6.57; 95% CI 9.57-10.48) persons compared to robust persons. Only seven longitudinal studies reported data on the risk of either incident prefrailty or frailty in persons with baseline polypharmacy. A significant higher odds of developing prefrailty was found in robust persons with polypharmacy (pooled OR = 1.30; 95% CI 1.12-1.51). We found no papers investigating polypharmacy incidence in persons with prefrailty/frailty.

CONCLUSIONS

Polypharmacy is common in prefrail and frail persons, and these individuals are also more likely to be on extreme drug regimens, i.e. hyperpolypharmacy, than robust older persons. More research is needed to investigate the causal relationship between polypharmacy and frailty syndromes, thereby identifying ways to jointly reduce drug burden and prefrailty/frailty in these individuals.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42018104756.

An International Perspective on Chronic Multimorbidity: Approaching the Elephant in the Room

Multimorbidity is a common and burdensome condition that may affect quality of life, increase medical needs, and make people live more years of life with disability. Negative outcomes related to multimorbidity occur beyond what we would expect from the summed effect of single conditions, as chronic diseases interact with each other, mutually enhancing their negative effects, and eventually leading to new clinical phenotypes. Moreover, multimorbidity mirrors an accelerated global susceptibility and a loss of resilience, which are both hallmarks of aging. Due to the complexity of its assessment and definition, and the lack of clear evidence steering its management, multimorbidity represents one of the main current challenges for clinicians, researchers, and policymakers. The authors of this article recently reflected on these issues during two twin international symposia at the 2016 European Union Geriatric Medicine Society (EUGMS) meeting in Lisbon, Portugal, and the 2016 Gerontological Society of America (GSA) meeting in New Orleans, USA. The present work summarizes the most relevant aspects related to multimorbidity, with the ultimate goal to identify knowledge gaps and suggest future directions to approach this condition.

No modifying effect of nutritional status on statins therapy in relation to all-cause death in older patients with coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND

Statins therapy in the secondary prevention of coronary artery disease (CAD) is associated with a lower risk of adverse cardiovascular events. However, little is known regarding the association of elderly patients with nutritional risk on statin therapy.

AIMS

To investigate whether older patients with CAD who were at nutritional risk gain similar survival benefit from statins therapy as their counterparts without nutritional risk.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective hospital-based cohort study among 1705 patients with CAD who were older than 65 years of age, using coronary heart disease database from 2008 to 2012. Nutritional status of included patients was gauged using the geriatric nutritional risk index. After stratification by nutritional status, the hazard of all-cause death was compared between those with or without statins therapy.

RESULTS

Of the 1705 patients included in the study (mean age 72 years; 73% male), all-cause death occurred in 146 (9.2%) patients with statins use and in 33 (26.2%) patients without statins use. The rate of all-cause death was higher in patients not receiving statins irrespective of nutritional status. After adjustments for potential confounders, the HR with statins use was 0.33 (95% CI 0.20-0.55) in patients without nutritional risk and 0.47 (95% CI 0.22-1.00) in patients with nutritional risk. No interaction effect was detected between nutritional status and statins use in relation to all-cause death (P value for interaction effect 0.516).

CONCLUSION

Despite of the patient's nutritional status, statins therapy as a secondary prevention in elderly CAD patients was associated with decreased risk of all-cause death.

The relationship between frailty and polypharmacy in older people: A systematic review

AIMS

Frailty is a complex geriatric syndrome resulting in decreased physiological reserves. Frailty and polypharmacy are common in older adults and the focus of extensive studies, although little is known about the impact they may have on each other. This is the first systematic review analysing the available evidence on the relationship between frailty and polypharmacy in older adults.

METHODS

Systematic review of quantitative studies. A comprehensive literature search for publications in English or Spanish was performed on MEDLINE, CINAHL, the Cochrane Database and PsycINFO in September 2017 without applying restrictions on the date of publication. Studies reporting any relationship between frailty and polypharmacy in older adults were considered.

RESULTS

A total of 25 publications were included, all of them observational studies. Evaluation of Fried's frailty criteria was the most common approach, followed by the Edmonton Frail Scale and FRAIL scale. Sixteen of 18 cross-sectional analyses and five of seven longitudinal analyses demonstrated a significant association between an increased number of medications and frailty. The causal relationship is unclear and appears to be bidirectional. Our analysis of published data suggests that polypharmacy could be a major contributor to the development of frailty.

CONCLUSIONS

A reduction of polypharmacy could be a cautious strategy to prevent and manage frailty. Further research is needed to confirm the possible benefits of reducing polypharmacy in the development, reversion or delay of frailty.

Relationship between frailty, polypharmacy, and underprescription in older adults living in nursing homes

PURPOSE

Frailty, polypharmacy, and underprescription are considered a major matter of concern in nursing homes, but the possible relationships between them are not well known. The aim is to examine the possible association between medication underprescription, polypharmacy, and frailty in older people living in nursing homes.

METHODS

A cross-sectional analysis from a concurrent cohort study, including 110 subjects ≥ 65 years living in two nursing homes. Four frailty scales were applied; polypharmacy was defined as ≥ 5 medications and underprescription was measured with Screening Tool to Alert to Right Treatment (START) criteria. Logistic regression models were performed to assess the associations.

RESULTS

The mean age was 86.3 years (SD 7.3) and 71.8% were female. 73.6% of subjects took ≥ 5 chronic medications and 60.9% met one or more START criteria. The non-frail participants took more medications than the frail subjects according to the imputated frailty Fried criteria (8.1 vs 6.7, p = 0.042) and the FRAIL-NH scale (7.8 vs 6.8, p = 0.026). Multivariate analyses did not find an association between frailty and polypharmacy. Frail participants according to the Fried criteria met a higher number of START criteria (1.9 vs 1.0, p = 0.017), and had a higher prevalence of underprescription (87.5 vs 50.0%), reaching the limit of statistical significance in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

The positive association found in previous studies between frailty and polypharmacy cannot be extrapolated to institutionalized populations. There is a trend towards higher rates of underprescription in frail subjects. Underprescription in frail older adults should be redefined and new strategies to measure it should be developed.

Clinically relevant potential drug-drug interactions among outpatients: A nationwide database study

BACKGROUND

Adverse drug events due to drug-drug interactions (DDIs) represent a considerable public health burden, also in Slovenia. A better understanding of the most frequently occurring potential DDIs may enable safer pharmacotherapy and minimize drug-related problems.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence and predictors of potential DDIs among outpatients in Slovenia.

METHODS

An analysis of potential DDIs was performed using health claims data on prescription drugs from a nationwide database. The Lexi-Interact Module was used as the reference source of interactions. The influence of patient-specific predictors on the risk of potential clinically relevant DDIs was evaluated using logistic regression model.

RESULTS

The study population included 1,179,803 outpatients who received 15,811,979 prescriptions. The total number of potential DDI cases identified was 3,974,994, of which 15.6% were potentially clinically relevant. Altogether, 9.3% (N = 191,213) of the total population in Slovenia is exposed to clinically relevant potential DDIs, and the proportion is higher among women and the elderly. After adjustment for cofactors, higher number of medications and older age are associated with higher odds of clinically relevant potential DDIs. The burden of DDIs is highest with drug combinations that increase risk of bleeding, enhance CNS depression or anticholinergic effects or cause cardiovascular complications.

CONCLUSION

The current study revealed that 1 in 10 individuals in the total Slovenian population is exposed to clinically relevant potential DDIs yearly. Taking into account the literature based conservative estimate that approximately 1% of potential DDIs result in negative health outcomes, roughly 1800 individuals in Slovenia experience an adverse health outcome each year as a result of clinically relevant potential interactions alone.

Prevalence of statin-drug interactions in older people: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Statins are among the most frequently prescribed medications internationally. Older people are commonly prescribed multiple medications and are at an increased risk of drug-drug interactions, including statin-drug interactions. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review of current evidence on the prevalence of statin-drug interactions in older people.

METHODS

A systematic search of observational studies in Embase, Medline, and PubMed was conducted. Articles were included if they were published in English during the period July 2000-July 2014 and reported on the prevalence of statin-drug interactions in people over 65 years of age. Two reviewers independently assessed the articles for eligibility and extracted the data.

RESULTS

The search returned 1556 eligible articles. A total of 19 articles met the inclusion criteria. In studies (n = 7) that focused on statin users only, the prevalence of potential statin-drug interactions assessed using different measures ranged from 0.19 to 33.0 %. In studies that examined drug interactions across a population of both statin users and non-users (n = 12), the prevalence of potential statin-drug interactions ranged from 0.1 to 7.1 % (n = 8), and the prevalence of clinically relevant statin-drug interactions ranged from 1.5 to 4 % (n = 4).

CONCLUSIONS

Current published evidence suggests substantial variations in the prevalence of statin-drug interactions and their clinical relevance. Further studies are necessary to provide a better understanding of the prevalence of clinically significant statin-drug interactions, the medications most frequently contributing to statin-drug interactions, and impact on relevant clinical outcomes in older people.