Safety and Systemic Exposure of Triamcinolone Acetonide Following Ultrasound-Guided Intra-Articular Injection of Triamcinolone Extended-Release or Standard Triamcinolone Acetonide in Patients with Shoulder Osteoarthritis: An Open-Label, Randomized Study

Association Between Intraoperative Periarticular Injection of Triamcinolone and Early Postoperative Infection in Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Analysis of a Japanese Nationwide Database

BACKGROUND

The safety of intraoperative periarticular triamcinolone injection in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains unclear. This study aimed to assess the association between periarticular injection of triamcinolone during primary TKA and complications, including early postoperative infection.

METHODS

A Japanese nationwide database was used to identify adults who underwent primary TKA between April 2016 and March 2022. Patients were divided into triamcinolone and control groups. The primary outcome was reoperation for infection within 90 days from primary TKA. Secondary outcomes included diagnosis of postoperative infection, wound complications, deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), in-hospital death, and readmission within 90 days. Propensity score matching was performed to adjust baseline differences. During the study period, 242,571 cases underwent primary knee arthroplasty. Among 212,427 eligible TKA patients, 15,229 (7.2%) were in the triamcinolone group and 197,198 (92.8%) were in the control group.

RESULTS

Overall, there were 551 reoperations for infection within 90 days (0.26%), including 61 (0.40%) patients in the triamcinolone group and 490 (0.25%) in the control group. Propensity score matching yielded 14,683 pairs. The triamcinolone group had a higher incidence of reoperation for infection, with a risk ratio (RR) of 1.67 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.10 to 2.53) and risk difference of 0.16% (95% CI: 0.03 to 0.29). Diagnoses of infection (RR: 1.25 [95% CI: 1.09 to 1.44]) and wound complications (RR: 1.18 [95% CI: 0.99 to 1.39]) were more frequent in the triamcinolone group, while DVT incidence was significantly lower (RR: 0.69 [95% CI: 0.65 to 0.73]). No significant differences were observed in PE or in-hospital death, although 90-day readmission was more frequent in the triamcinolone group (RR: 1.22 [95% CI: 1.06 to 1.40]).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the difference was subtle, periarticular injection of triamcinolone during TKA was associated with an increased risk of early postoperative infection requiring reoperation.

Use and safety of corticosteroid injections in joints and musculoskeletal soft tissue: guidelines from the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, the American Academy of Pain Medicine, the American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians, and the International Pain and Spine Intervention Society

BACKGROUND

Intra-articular corticosteroid (IACS) injection and peri-articular corticosteroid injection are commonly used to treat musculoskeletal conditions. Results vary by musculoskeletal region, but most studies report short-term benefit with mixed results on long-term relief. Publications showed adverse events from single corticosteroid injections. Recommended effective doses were lower than those currently used by clinicians.

METHODS

Development of the practice guideline for joint injections was approved by the Board of Directors of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine and the participating societies. A Corticosteroid Safety Work Group coordinated the development of three guidelines: peripheral nerve blocks and trigger points; joints; and neuraxial, facet, and sacroiliac joint injections. The topics included safety of the technique in relation to landmark-guided, ultrasound-guided, or radiology-aided injections; effect of the addition of the corticosteroid on the efficacy of the injectate; and adverse events related to the injection. Experts on the topics were assigned to extensively review the literature and initially develop consensus statements and recommendations. A modified version of the US Preventive Services Task Force grading of evidence and strength of recommendation was followed. A modified Delphi process was adhered to in arriving at a consensus.

RESULTS

This guideline focuses on the safety and efficacy of corticosteroid joint injections for managing joint chronic pain in adults. The joints that were addressed included the shoulder, elbow, hand, wrist, hip, knee, and small joints of the hands and feet. All the statements and recommendations were approved by all participants and the Board of Directors of the participating societies after four rounds of discussion. There is little evidence to guide the selection of one corticosteroid over another. Ultrasound guidance increases the accuracy of injections and reduces procedural pain. A dose of 20 mg triamcinolone is as effective as 40 mg for both shoulder IACS and subacromial subdeltoid bursa corticosteroid injections. The commonly used dose for hip IACS is 40 mg triamcinolone or methylprednisolone. Triamcinolone 40 mg is as effective as 80 mg for knee IACS. Overall, IACS injections result in short-term pain relief from a few weeks to a few months. The adverse events include an increase in blood glucose, adrenal suppression, detrimental effect on cartilage lining the joint, reduction of bone mineral density, and postoperative joint infection.

CONCLUSIONS

In this practice guideline, we provided specific recommendations on the role of corticosteroids in joint, bursa, and peritendon injections for musculoskeletal pain.

The Challenges of Local Intra-Articular Therapy

Fibroblast-like synoviocytes (FLSs) are among the main disease-driving players in most cases of monoarthritis (MonoA), oligoarthritis, and polyarthritis. In this review, we look at the characteristics and therapeutic challenges at the onset of arthritis and during follow-up management. In some cases, these forms of arthritis develop into autoimmune polyarthritis, such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), whereas local eradication of the RA synovium could still be combined with systemic treatment using immunosuppressive agents. Currently, the outcomes of local synovectomies are well studied; however, there is still a lack of a comprehensive analysis of current local intra-articular treatments highlighting their advantages and disadvantages. Therefore, the aim of this study is to review local intra-articular therapy strategies. According to publications from the last decade on clinical studies focused on intra-articular treatment with anti-inflammatory molecules, a range of novel slow-acting forms of steroidal drugs for the local treatment of synovitis have been investigated. As pain is an essential symptom, caused by both inflammation and cartilage damage, various molecules acting on pain receptors are being investigated in clinical trials as potential targets for local intra-articular treatment. We also overview the new targets for local treatment, including surface markers and intracellular proteins, non-coding ribonucleic acids (RNAs), etc.

Intra-articular corticosteroids for the treatment of osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis on the comparison of different molecules and doses

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to quantify and compare the clinical relevance of the different intra-articular corticosteroids (CS) effects in vivo for osteoarthritis (OA) treatment.

Methods

The search was conducted on PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science in October 2023. The PRISMA guidelines were used. Inclusion criteria: animal or human randomized controlled trials (RCTs), English language and no time limitation, on the comparison of different intra-articular CS for OA treatment. The articles' quality was assessed using the Cochrane RoB2 and GRADE guidelines for human RCTs, and SYRCLE's tool for animal RCTs.

Results

Eighteen RCTs were selected (16 human and 2 animal studies), including 1577 patients (1837 joints) and 31 animals (51 joints). The CS used were triamcinolone (14 human and 2 animal studies), methylprednisolone (7 human and 1 animal study), betamethasone (3 human studies) and dexamethasone (1 human study). All studies addressed knee OA except for three human and one animal study. A meta-analysis was performed on the comparison of methylprednisolone and triamcinolone in humans with knee OA analysing VAS pain at very short- (≤2 weeks), short- (>2 and ≤4 weeks), mid- (>4 and ≤8 weeks), long- (>8 and ≤ 12 weeks), and very long-term (>12 and ≤24 weeks). Triamcinolone showed better post-injection values compared to methylprednisolone at very short-term (p = 0.028). No difference in terms of VAS improvement was observed at any follow-up.

Conclusions

The available preclinical and clinical literature provides limited evidence on the comparison of different CS, hindering the possibility of determining the best CS approach in terms of molecule and dose for the intra-articular injection of OA joints.

Level of Evidence

Level I.

The Emerging Era of Interventional Imaging in Rheumatology: An Overview During the Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic

Imaging has long been taking its place in the diagnosis, monitor, and prognosis of rheumatic diseases. It plays a vital role in the appraisal of treatment. Key progress in the clinical practice of rheumatology is the innovation of advanced imaging modalities; such as musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS), computerized tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). These modalities introduced a promising noninvasive method for visualizing bone and soft tissues to enable an improved diagnosis. The use of MSUS in rheumatology is considered a landmark in the evolution of the specialty and its ease of use and many applications in rheumatic diseases make it a forerunner instrument in the practice. The use of MSUS among rheumatologists must parallel the development rate of the excellence revealed in the specialty. Moreover, innovative interventional imaging in rheumatology (III-R) is gaining fame and key roles in the near future for a comprehensive management of rheumatic diseases with precision. This review article throws light on the emergence of these robust innovations that may reshape the guidelines and practice in rheumatology, in particular, efforts to enhance best practice during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic are endorsed.

A Randomized, Open-Label, Single-Dose Study to Assess Safety and Systemic Exposure of Triamcinolone Acetonide Extended-Release in Patients With Hip Osteoarthritis

Introduction

Intra-articular (IA) corticosteroids, including triamcinolone acetonide (TA), are a recommended treatment for hip osteoarthritis. We compared the safety and systemic exposure of TA extended-release (TA-ER) versus TA crystalline suspension (TAcs) in patients with hip osteoarthritis.

Methods

In this phase 2, randomized, multicenter, open-label, single-dose study (NCT03382262), patients with hip osteoarthritis were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive single IA injections of TA-ER 32 mg or TAcs 40 mg. Safety assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis up to day 85. PK parameters included area under the concentration–time curve, total body drug clearance, maximum concentration (C_max), mean residence time, half-life, and time to maximum concentration.

Results

Of 30 patients (TA-ER: n = 15; TAcs: n = 15) randomized and included in the Safety Population, 25 patients were evaluated in the PK Population. TEAEs were reported in four of 15 (26.7%) patients who received TA-ER and in seven of 15 (46.7%) patients who received TAcs. The most common TEAEs included arthralgia and headache. All TEAEs were of grade 1 or 2 in severity. TA-ER produced substantially lower peak plasma TA concentrations compared with TAcs (C_max geometric mean: 890.4 vs. 5549.4 pg/ml), and these were less variable with TA-ER versus TAcs. Similarly, overall TA systemic exposure was substantially lower for TA-ER versus TAcs, with gradual elimination from systemic circulation through day 85.

Conclusions

Following a single IA injection in the hip, TA-ER was generally well tolerated, with a safety profile comparable to that of TAcs. Systemic TA exposure was markedly lower in TA-ER-treated patients, consistent with the PK profile observed in knee osteoarthritis.

Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03382262.