Dissociated Responses in Patients with Metastatic Solid Tumors Treated with Immunotherapy

Liver metastases do not predict resistance to the addition of atezolizumab to first-line FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab in proficient MMR metastatic colorectal cancer: a secondary analysis of the AtezoTRIBE study

BACKGROUND

Liver metastases (LMs) are related to poor efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-containing therapies. In the AtezoTRIBE trial, Immunoscore-Immune-Checkpoint (immunoscore-IC) was a predictor of benefit from atezolizumab in mismatch repair-proficient (pMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In pMMR patients enrolled in the AtezoTRIBE study, we investigated the association of LMs with immune-related biomarkers and treatment outcomes, and the predictive role of immunoscore-IC in the LMs group.

RESULTS

Out of 202 pMMR patients, 151 (75%) had LMs. No differences in immune-related features were observed according to the presence or not of LMs, except for a lower prevalence of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes-high tumours in the LMs group (33% versus 52%, P = 0.03). Worse outcomes were observed among patients with LMs [progression-free survival (PFS), P = 0.002; overall survival (OS), P = 0.011], also in multivariable models. The effect of adding atezolizumab to FOLFOXIRI/bevacizumab was independent from LMs in terms of PFS (Pint = 0.990) and OS (Pint = 0.800). Among patients with pMMR mCRC and LMs, those with immunoscore-IC-high but not those with immunoscore-IC-low tumours achieved benefit from atezolizumab, though in the absence of a statistically significant interaction effect (Pint for PFS and OS = 0.166 and 0.473, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

LMs are associated with poor prognosis in pMMR mCRC and do not predict resistance to the addition of atezolizumab to FOLFOXIRI/bevacizumab. Immunoscore-IC seems to retain its predictive impact also among patients with LMs.

Multimodal Imaging Approach for Tumor Treatment Response Evaluation in the Era of Immunotherapy

ABSTRACT

Immunotherapy is likely the most remarkable advancement in lung cancer treatment during the past decade. Although immunotherapy provides substantial benefits, their therapeutic responses differ from those of conventional chemotherapy and targeted therapy, and some patients present unique immunotherapy response patterns that cannot be judged under the current measurement standards. Therefore, the response monitoring of immunotherapy can be challenging, such as the differentiation between real response and pseudo-response. This review outlines the various tumor response patterns to immunotherapy and discusses methods for quantifying computed tomography (CT) and 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) in the field of lung cancer. Emerging technologies in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and non-FDG PET tracers are also explored. With immunotherapy responses, the role for imaging is essential in both anatomical radiological responses (CT/MRI) and molecular changes (PET imaging). Multiple aspects must be considered when assessing treatment responses using CT and PET. Finally, we introduce multimodal approaches that integrate imaging and nonimaging data, and we discuss future directions for the assessment and prediction of lung cancer responses to immunotherapy.

Dissociated response and treatment outcome with immune checkpoint blockade in advanced cancer

Immune-related dissociated response (DR) has been recently recognized and have become a subject of ongoing interest. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the frequency, treatment outcome, and predictors of DR in cancer patients with immune checkpoint inhibitors. We retrospectively collected clinicopathological data from a cohort of patients with cancer who received PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-based monotherapy or combination therapy at a single institution (developing cohort). An independent cohort of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with immunotherapy at two institutions was used as the validating cohort. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were used as outcome measures. The pantumor cohort included 177 patients. DR were observed in 12 (6.8%) patients. The median PFS and OS were significantly longer in patients with atypical response versus nonresponse but shorter versus true response. Patients with DR had a longer median PFS and OS than those with true progressive disease (PD). Local treatment seemed to have a positive influence on DR patient outcomes, with a median OS of 32.3 months versus 21.9 months for no local treatment. No clinical characteristics remained significant predictors for DR. In the NSCLC cohort, DR was observed in 10 (12.5%) patients. Inferior PFS and OS were validated in patients with real PD when compared with patients with DR. Patients who experience DR exhibit a relatively favorable prognosis. Some patients with DR may benefit from the continuation of ICI administration and local treatment to the growing lesions and achieve a longer survival.

Case report: The impact of dissociated response of immunotherapy on the treatment strategy of advanced head and neck cancer

Some special therapeutic responses may appear during immunotherapy, such as hyperprogression, pseudoprogression and so on. Dissociated response of immunotherapy has been clinically reported in recent years mainly in lung cancer and kidney cancer. Since there were poor prognosis and simple treatment of advanced head and neck cancer, the application of immunotherapy in head and neck cancer has risen in recent years. But the dissociated response of immunotherapy in head and neck cancer is rarely reported. We reported two series of cases of advanced head and neck cancer that showed dissociated response after immunotherapy, tumor progression was assessed by imaging methods such as PET-CT, enhanced CT and enhanced MR, and reviewed the literature related to dissociated response in immunotherapy. We propose that the dissociated response of immunotherapy may affect the treatment strategy of advanced head and neck cancer, but more clinical analyses and researches are needed to confirm it.

Efficacy and safety of anlotinib plus penpulimab as second-line treatment for small cell lung cancer: A multicenter, open-label, single-arm phase II trial

BACKGROUND

Currently, the need for new therapeutic strategies involving programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) monoclonal antibodies in the second-line setting of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is urgent. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib plus penpulimab as a second-line treatment for patients with SCLC who progressed after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy.

METHODS

This study included the patients from Cohort 4 of a single-arm, open-label, multicenter, phase II clinical trial. A safety run-in phase was performed under anlotinib (10/12 mg quaque die [QD], days 1-14) plus penpulimab (200 mg intravenously [IV], day 1) in a 21-day cycle, followed by the formal trial in which the patients received anlotinib (12 mg QD, days 1-14) plus penpulimab (200 mg IV, day 1) in a 21-day cycle. The primary endpoint of the safety run-in phase was safety. The primary endpoint of the formal trial phase was the objective response rate (ORR).

RESULTS

From April 28, 2020, to November 24, 2020, 21 patients were enrolled from 11 hospitals, including 2 in the safety run-in phase and 19 in the formal trial phase. In the formal trial phase, the ORR was 42.1% (8/19; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 17.7-66.6%). The median progression-free survival was 4.8 months (95% CI: 2.9-11.3 months), and the median overall survival was 13.0 months (95% CI: 4.6-not applicable [NA] months). The incidence of ≥grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) was 52.4% (11/21), and the incidence of treatment-related serious adverse events (AEs) was 28.6% (6/21). Two AE-related deaths occurred. The most common AEs were hypertension (57.1%, 12/21), hypothyroidism (42.9%, 9/21), and hypertriglyceridemia (38.1%, 8/21).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with SCLC who progressed after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy, the second-line anlotinib plus penpulimab treatment demonstrates promising anti-cancer activity and a manageable safety profile, which warrants further investigation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

No. NCT04203719, https://clinicaltrials.gov/.

Progressive Disease with Mixed Response After Immunotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Purpose

There exists a dearth of research concerning non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients experiencing overall progressive disease concomitant with shrinking lesions after immunotherapy. This is a special type of mixed response. We aim to evaluate the clinical characteristics and treatment options of these patients during immunotherapy.

Patients and Methods

We categorized patients into two groups: Progressive Disease with Mixed Responses (PDMR) (n = 31) and Progressive Disease with None Mixed Responses (PDNMR) (n = 144), depending on whether at least one target lesion had shrunk by ≥30% at the point of overall progression. Computed tomography scans and magnetic resonance imaging were utilized to evaluate the clinicopathological significance of these patients, and a multivariate analysis was conducted to scrutinize the clinical characteristics and prognosis-influencing factors in these patients.

Results

Patients in the PDMR group had worse staging and a greater proportion of previous radiotherapy. The median overall survival (mOS 22 vs 36.4 months; P = 0.019) and median progression-free survival (mPFS 5.83 vs 9.03 months; P = 0.031) of the PDMR group were shorter than PDNMR group. Longer subsequent OS with continued immunotherapy after PDMR compared with patients who do not continue with immunization after PDMR (mOS 23.9 vs 6.5 months; P = 0.024).

Conclusion

PDMR was primarily observed in stage IV patients and previously irradiated patients. OS and PFS were inferior in patients with PDMR compared to patients with PDNMR. The continuation of immunotherapy in PDMR patients could extend their survival.

Beyond the Barrier: Unraveling the Mechanisms of Immunotherapy Resistance

Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) induces a remarkable and durable response in a subset of cancer patients. However, most patients exhibit either primary or acquired resistance to ICB. This resistance arises from a complex interplay of diverse dynamic mechanisms within the tumor microenvironment (TME). These mechanisms include genetic, epigenetic, and metabolic alterations that prevent T cell trafficking to the tumor site, induce immune cell dysfunction, interfere with antigen presentation, drive heightened expression of coinhibitory molecules, and promote tumor survival after immune attack. The TME worsens ICB resistance through the formation of immunosuppressive networks via immune inhibition, regulatory metabolites, and abnormal resource consumption. Finally, patient lifestyle factors, including obesity and microbiome composition, influence ICB resistance. Understanding the heterogeneity of cellular, molecular, and environmental factors contributing to ICB resistance is crucial to develop targeted therapeutic interventions that enhance the clinical response. This comprehensive overview highlights key mechanisms of ICB resistance that may be clinically translatable.

Versican Associates with Tumor Immune Phenotype and Limits T-cell Trafficking via Chondroitin Sulfate

Immunotherapies for cancers of epithelial origin have limited efficacy, and a growing body of evidence links the composition of extracellular matrix (ECM) with the likelihood of a favorable response to treatment. The ECM may be considered an immunologic barrier, restricting the localization of cytotoxic immune cells to stromal areas and inhibiting their contact with tumor cells. Identifying ECM components of this immunologic barrier could provide targets that whether degraded in situ may support antitumor immunity and improve immunotherapy response. Using a library of primary triple-negative breast cancer tissues, we correlated CD8+ T-cell tumor contact with ECM composition and identified a proteoglycan, versican (VCAN), as a putative member of the immunologic barrier. Our analysis reveals that CD8+ T-cell contact with tumor associates with the location of VCAN expression, the specific glycovariant of VCAN [defined through the pattern of posttranslational attachments of glycosaminoglycans (GAG)], and the cell types that produce the variant. In functional studies, the isomers of chondroitin sulfate presented on VCAN have opposing roles being either supportive or inhibiting of T-cell trafficking, and removal of the GAGs ameliorates these effects on T-cell trafficking. Overall, we conclude that VCAN can either support or inhibit T-cell trafficking within the tumor microenvironment depending on the pattern of GAGs present, and that VCAN is a major component of the ECM immunologic barrier that defines the type of response to immunotherapy.

SIGNIFICANCE

The response to immunotherapy has been poor toward solid tumors despite immune cells infiltrating into the tumor. The ECM has been associated with impacting T-cell infiltration toward the tumor and in this article we have identified VCAN and its structural modification, chondroitin sulfate as having a key role in T-cell invasion.

PET/Computed Tomography Transformation of Oncology: Immunotherapy Assessment

Immunotherapy approaches have changed the treatment landscape in a variety of malignancies with a high anti-tumor response. Immunotherapy may be associated with novel response and progression patterns that pose a substantial challenge to the conventional criteria for assessing treatment response, including response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) 1.1. In addition to the morphologic details provided by computed tomography (CT) and MRI, hybrid molecular imaging emerges as a comprehensive imaging modality with the capacity to interrogate pathophysiological mechanisms like glucose metabolism. This review highlights the current status of 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) in prognostication, response monitoring, and identifying immune-related adverse events. Furthermore, it investigates the potential role of novel immuno-PET tracers that could complement the utilization of 18F-FDG PET/CT by imaging the specific pathways involved in immunotherapeutic strategies.

Phase Ib/II trial of tipapkinogene sovacivec, a therapeutic human papillomavirus16-vaccine, in combination with avelumab in patients with advanced human papillomavirus16-positive cancers

PURPOSE

To evaluate tipapkinogene sovacivec (TG4001), a viral immunotherapeutic vaccine expressing human papillomavirus (HPV)16 E6/E7 non-oncogenic proteins and IL-2, in combination with avelumab in HPV16+ cancer patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this open-label, phase Ib/II, multicenter study, HPV16+ advanced cancer patients received subcutaneous TG4001 at two dose levels (DL) in phase Ib and at the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) in phase II weekly for 6 weeks, then every 2 weeks (q2Wk) until 6 months, thereafter every 12 weeks, in combination with avelumab q2Wk starting from day 8. Exploratory end-points included immunomonitoring from sequential tumour and blood samples.

RESULTS

Forty-three patients, mainly heavily pretreated (88% ≥ 1 previous line), were included in the safety analysis, with a majority of anal cancer (44%). No dose-limiting toxicities were reported, and DL2 (5 × 107 Plaque forming units (PFU)) was selected as the RP2D. Treatment-related adverse events to TG4001 occurred in 93% of patients, mostly grade 1/2, with grade 3 anaemia in one patient and no grade 4/5. Overall response rate (ORR) was 22% (8/36) and 32% (8/25) in all and patients without liver metastases, respectively. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS) were 2.8 months (95% CI: 1.4-5.6) and 11.0 months (95% CI:7.5-16.7) in the total population and 5.6 months (95% CI:1.6-9.6) and 13.3 months (95% CI:8.7-32.7) in patients without liver metastases. Antigen-specific T-cell response was identified in 7/11 patients by IFNγ ELISpot.

CONCLUSIONS

TG4001 in combination with avelumab is safe, demonstrated antitumour activity in heavily pre-treated HPV16+ cancer patients, and is currently being evaluated in a randomised phase II trial in patients with incurable anogenital cancer and limited hepatic involvement.

CLINICALTRIALS

GOV IDENTIFIER

NCT03260023.

Assessing the Increased Variability in Individual Lesion Kinetics During Immunotherapy: Does It Exist, and Does It Matter?

PURPOSE

Several studies have raised the hypothesis that immunotherapy may exacerbate the variability in individual lesions, increasing the risk of observing divergent kinetic profiles within the same patient. This questions the use of the sum of the longest diameter to follow the response to immunotherapy. Here, we aimed to study this hypothesis by developing a model that estimates the different sources of variability in lesion kinetics, and we used this model to evaluate the impact of this variability on survival.

METHODS

We relied on a semimechanistic model to follow the nonlinear kinetics of lesions and their impact on the risk of death, adjusted on organ location. The model incorporated two levels of random effects to characterize both between- and within-patient variability in response to treatment. The model was estimated on 900 patients from a phase III randomized trial evaluating programmed death-ligand 1 checkpoint inhibitor atezolizumab versus chemotherapy in patients with second-line metastatic urothelial carcinoma (IMvigor211).

RESULTS

The within-patient variability in the four parameters that characterize individual lesion kinetics represented between 12% and 78% of the total variability during chemotherapy. Similar results were obtained during atezolizumab, except for the durability of the treatment effects, for which the within-patient variability was markedly larger than during chemotherapy (40% v 12%, respectively). Accordingly, the occurrence of divergent profile consistently increased over time in patients treated with atezolizumab and was equal to about 20% after 1 year of treatment. Finally, we show that accounting for the within-patient variability provided a better prediction of most at-risk patients than a model relying solely on the sum of the longest diameter.

CONCLUSION

Within-patient variability provides valuable information for the assessment of treatment efficacy and the detection of at-risk patients.

Tumor response assessment on imaging following immunotherapy

In recent years, various systemic immunotherapies have been developed for cancer treatment, such as monoclonal antibodies (mABs) directed against immune checkpoints (immune checkpoint inhibitors, ICIs), oncolytic viruses, cytokines, cancer vaccines, and adoptive cell transfer. While being estimated to be eligible in 38.5% of patients with metastatic solid or hematological tumors, ICIs, in particular, demonstrate durable disease control across many oncologic diseases (e.g., in melanoma, lung, bladder, renal, head, and neck cancers) and overall survival benefits. Due to their unique mechanisms of action based on T-cell activation, response to immunotherapies is characterized by different patterns, such as progression prior to treatment response (pseudoprogression), hyperprogression, and dissociated responses following treatment. Because these features are not encountered in the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), which is the standard for response assessment in oncology, new criteria were defined for immunotherapies. The most important changes in these new morphologic criteria are, firstly, the requirement for confirmatory imaging examinations in case of progression, and secondly, the appearance of new lesions is not necessarily considered a progressive disease. Until today, five morphologic (immune-related response criteria (irRC), immune-related RECIST (irRECIST), immune RECIST (iRECIST), immune-modified RECIST (imRECIST), and intra-tumoral RECIST (itRECIST)) criteria have been developed to accurately assess changes in target lesion sizes, taking into account the specific response patterns after immunotherapy. In addition to morphologic response criteria, 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG-PET/CT) is a promising option for metabolic response assessment and four metabolic criteria are used (PET/CT Criteria for Early Prediction of Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy (PECRIT), PET Response Evaluation Criteria for Immunotherapy (PERCIMT), immunotherapy-modified PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (imPERCIST5), and immune PERCIST (iPERCIST)). Besides, there is evidence that parameters on 18F-FDG-PET/CT, such as the standardized uptake value (SUV)max and several radiotracers, e.g., directed against PD-L1, may be potential imaging biomarkers of response. Moreover, the emerge of human intratumoral immunotherapy (HIT-IT), characterized by the direct injection of immunostimulatory agents into a tumor lesion, has given new importance to imaging assessment. This article reviews the specific imaging patterns of tumor response and progression and available imaging response criteria following immunotherapy.

Immune-related dissociated response as a specific atypical response pattern in solid tumors with immune checkpoint blockade

Immune checkpoint blockade using immune checkpoint inhibitors, including cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen–4 and programmed cell death protein-1/programmed cell death ligand–1 inhibitors, has revolutionized systematic treatment for advanced solid tumors, with unprecedented survival benefit and tolerable toxicity. Nivolumab, pembrolizumab, cemiplimab, avelumab, durvalumab, atezolizumab, and ipilimumab are currently approved standard treatment options for various human cancer types. The response rate to immune checkpoint inhibitors, however, is unsatisfactory, and unexpectedly, atypical radiological responses, including delayed responses, pseudoprogression, hyperprogression, and dissociated responses (DRs), are observed in a small subgroup of patients. The benefit of immunotherapy for advanced patients who exhibit atypical responses is underestimated according to the conventional response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST). In particular, DR is considered a mixed radiological or heterogeneous response pattern when responding and nonresponding lesions or new lesions coexist simultaneously. The rate of DR reported in different studies encompass a wide range of 3.3–47.8% based on diverse definition of DR. Although DR is also associated with treatment efficacy and a favorable prognosis, it is different from pseudoprogression, which has concordant progressive lesions and can be regularly captured by immune RECIST. This review article aims to comprehensively determine the frequency, definition, radiological evaluation, probable molecular mechanisms, prognosis, and clinical management of immune-related DR and help clinicians and radiologists objectively and correctly interpret this specific atypical response and better understand and manage cancer patients with immunotherapy and guarantee their best clinical benefit.