Navigating the Regulatory Landscape to Develop Pediatric Oncology Drugs: Expert Opinion Recommendations

Therapeutic approaches for targeting the pediatric brain tumor microenvironment

Central nervous system (CNS) tumors are the most frequent solid malignant tumors in pediatric patients and are the leading cause of tumor-related death in children. Treatment for this heterogeneous group of tumors consists of various combinations of safe maximal surgical resection, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy which offer a cure for some children but often cause debilitating adverse late effects in others. While therapies targeting the tumor microenvironment (TME) like immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) have been successful in treating some cancers, these therapies failed to exhibit treatment efficacy in the majority of pediatric brain tumors in the clinic. Importantly, the pediatric TME is unique and distinct from adult brain tumors and designing therapies to effectively target these tumors requires understanding the unique biology of pediatric brain tumors and the use of translational models that recapitulate the TME. Here we describe the TME of medulloblastoma (MB) and diffuse midline glioma (DMG), specifically diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG), and further present the current drug delivery approaches and clinical administration routes targeting the TME in these tumors, including preclinical and clinical studies.

Lineage-dependence of the neuroblastoma surfaceome defines tumor cell state-dependent and independent immunotherapeutic targets

Background

Neuroblastoma is a heterogeneous disease with adrenergic (ADRN)- and therapy resistant mesenchymal (MES)-like cells driven by distinct transcription factor networks. Here, we investigate the expression of immunotherapeutic targets in each neuroblastoma subtype and propose pan-neuroblastoma and cell state specific targetable cell-surface proteins.

Methods

We characterized cell lines, patient-derived xenografts, and patient samples as ADRN-dominant or MES- dominant to define subtype-specific and pan-neuroblastoma gene sets. Targets were validated with ChIP- sequencing, immunoblotting, and flow cytometry in neuroblastoma cell lines and isogenic ADRN-to-MES transition cell line models. Finally, we evaluated the activity of MES-specific agents in vivo and in vitro .

Results

Most immunotherapeutic targets being developed for neuroblastoma showed significantly higher expression in the ADRN subtype with limited expression in MES-like tumor cells. In contrast, CD276 (B7-H3) and L1CAM maintained expression across both ADRN and MES states. We identified several receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) enriched in MES-dominant samples and showed that AXL targeting with ADCT-601 was potently cytotoxic in MES-dominant cell lines and showed specific anti-tumor activity in a MES cell line-derived xenograft.

Conclusions

Immunotherapeutic strategies for neuroblastoma must address the potential of epigenetic downregulation of antigen density as a mechanism for immune evasion. We identified several RTKs as candidate MES-specific immunotherapeutic target proteins for the elimination of therapy-resistant cells. We hypothesize that the phenomena of immune escape will be less likely when targeting pan-neuroblastoma cell surface proteins such as B7-H3 and L1CAM, and/or dual targeting strategies that consider both the ADRN- and MES-cell states.

Key Points

Cellular plasticity influences the abundance of immunotherapeutic targets.Subtype-specific targets may be susceptible to epigenetically-mediated downregulation.Immunotherapeutic targets in development, B7-H3 and L1CAM, show "pan-subtype" expression.

Importance of Study

Neuroblastoma is a lethal childhood malignancy that shows cellular plasticity in response to anti-cancer therapies. Several plasma membrane proteins are being developed as immunotherapeutic targets in this disease. Here we define which cell surface proteins are susceptible to epigenetically regulated downregulation during an adrenergic to mesenchymal cell state switch and propose immunotherapeutic strategies to anticipate and circumvent acquired immunotherapeutic resistance.

Development of a Value Assessment Framework for Pediatric Health Technologies Using Multicriteria Decision Analysis: Expanding the Value Lens for Funding Decision Making

OBJECTIVES

A health technology assessment (HTA) does not systematically account for the circumstances and needs of children and youth. To supplement HTA processes, we aimed to develop a child-tailored value assessment framework using a multicriteria decision analysis approach.

METHODS

We constructed a multicriteria-decision-analysis-based model in multiple phases to create the Comprehensive Assessment of Technologies for Child Health (CATCH) framework. Using a modified Delphi process with stakeholders having broad disciplinary and geographic variation (N = 23), we refined previously generated criteria and developed rank-based weights. We established a criterion-pertinent scoring rubric for assessing incremental benefits of new drugs. Three clinicians independently assessed comprehension by pilotscoring 9 drugs. We then validated CATCH for 2 childhood cancer therapies through structured deliberation with an expert panel (N = 10), obtaining individual scores, consensus scores, and verbal feedback. Analyses included descriptive statistics, thematic analysis, exploratory disagreement indices, and sensitivity analysis.

RESULTS

The modified Delphi process yielded 10 criteria, based on absolute importance/relevance and agreed importance (median disagreement indices = 0.34): Effectiveness, Child-specific Health-related Quality of Life, Disease Severity, Unmet Need, Therapeutic Safety, Equity, Family Impacts, Life-course Development, Rarity, and Fair Share of Life. Pilot scoring resulted in adjusted criteria definitions and more precise score-scaling guidelines. Validation panelists endorsed the framework's key modifiers of value. Modes of their individual prescores aligned closely with deliberative consensus scores.

CONCLUSIONS

We iteratively developed a value assessment framework that captures dimensions of child-specific health and nonhealth gains. CATCH could improve the richness and relevance of HTA decision making for children in Canada and comparable health systems.

Off-label prescribing of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy at a single pediatric cancer center

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have improved outcomes in a variety of adult cancers and are prescribed with increasing frequency across oncology. However, patterns of off-label use of ICI in pediatrics remain unclear.

METHODS

This is a single-institution, retrospective cohort study evaluating off-label ICI use in pediatric and young adult patients with cancer treated at our institution from 2014 to 2022. Response was based on clinician assessment derived from clinical records. Immune-related adverse events (iRAEs) were classified according to CTCAE v5.0.

RESULTS

We identified 50 unique patients treated with off-label ICI (28 with solid tumors, 20 with central nervous system (CNS) tumors, 2 with hematologic malignancies). At time of ICI initiation, only five patients (10%) had localized disease, and all but one patient was treated in the relapsed/refractory setting. All patients were treated with the FDA-approved weight-based dosing recommendations. Overall, there was disease control in 21 patients (42%), with best response including one complete response (melanoma), two partial responses (high-grade glioma, CNS nongerminomatous germ cell tumor), and 18 patients with stable disease. Forty-four patients (88%) eventually experienced disease progression. Among 22 patients (44%) experiencing iRAEs, 10 (20%) had a grade ≥3 irAE, 12 (24%) required corticosteroids, and 14 (28%) required ICI discontinuation. irAE occurrence was associated with significantly improved progression-free survival (HR 0.35; 95% CI: 0.18 to 0.68; p = 0.002) and overall survival (HR 0.33; 95% CI: 0.17 to 0.66; p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

At our institution, ICI was most commonly prescribed in the relapsed/refractory setting to patients with metastatic disease. The treatment was generally well-tolerated in the pediatric population. The overall response rate was low, and the majority of patients eventually experienced disease progression. A few patients, however, had durable treatment responses. Further studies are needed to identify which pediatric patients are most likely to benefit from ICI.

Pediatric oncology drug development and dosage optimization

Oncology drug discovery and development has always been an area facing many challenges. Phase 1 oncology studies are typically small, open-label, sequential studies enrolling a small sample of adult patients (i.e., 3-6 patients/cohort) in dose escalation. Pediatric evaluations typically lag behind the adult development program. The pediatric starting dose is traditionally referenced on the recommended phase 2 dose in adults with the incorporation of body size scaling. The size of the study is also small and dependent upon the prevalence of the disease in the pediatric population. Similar to adult development, the dose is escalated or de-escalated until reaching the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) that also provides desired biological activities or efficacy. The escalation steps and identification of MTD are often rule-based and do not incorporate all the available information, such as pharmacokinetic (PK), pharmacodynamic (PD), tolerability and efficacy data. Therefore, it is doubtful if the MTD approach is optimal to determine the dosage. Hence, it is important to evaluate whether there is an optimal dosage below the MTD, especially considering the emerging complexity of combination therapies and the long-term tolerability and safety of the treatments. Identification of an optimal dosage is also vital not only for adult patients but for pediatric populations as well. Dosage-finding is much more challenging for pediatric populations due to the limited patient population and differences among the pediatric age range in terms of maturation and ontogeny that could impact PK. Many sponsors defer the pediatric strategy as they are often perplexed by the challenges presented by pediatric oncology drug development (model of action relevancy to pediatric population, budget, timeline and regulatory requirements). This leads to a limited number of approved drugs for pediatric oncology patients. This review article provides the current regulatory landscape, incentives and how they impact pediatric drug discovery and development. We also consider different pediatric cancers and potential clinical trial challenges/opportunities when designing pediatric clinical trials. An outline of how quantitative methods such as pharmacometrics/modelling & simulation can support the dosage-finding and justification is also included. Finally, we provide some reflections that we consider helpful to accelerate pediatric drug discovery and development.

Timing for First-in-Minor Clinical Trials of New Cancer Drugs

OBJECTIVES

To describe the delay for first-in-minor cancer clinical trials and its relationship with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval.

STUDY DESIGN

We used ClinicalTrials.gov to create a sample of pediatric-relevant cancer drugs starting efficacy testing in adults from 2006 through 2011. We characterized the delay between first-in-adult efficacy trials and first-in-minor trials. We also assessed the proportion of drugs evaluated in minors that failed to gain approval, the proportions that were not evaluated in minors before receiving the FDA approval, and whether shorter delay was associated with larger effect sizes or greater probability of regulatory approval.

RESULTS

Thirty-four percent of the 185 drugs in our cohort were evaluated in minors; the median delay to clinical trials was 4.16 years. Of all drugs, 17% received the FDA approval, 41% of which were never tested in minors before licensing. Of the 153 drugs not attaining approval, 78% were not evaluated in minors. Earlier testing did not significantly predict greater response rates (P = .13). Drugs not attaining regulatory approval were evaluated significantly earlier (3.0 for drugs not approved vs 5.4 years delayed testing for approved drugs, P = .019).

CONCLUSIONS

New cancer drugs were typically evaluated in minors years after adult efficacy evaluation. This delay likely eliminated some drugs lacking desirable pharmacology before pediatric testing. However, some drugs that were eliminated may have had activity in pediatric indications. Approaches for prioritizing drugs for pediatric testing warrants further consideration.

Clinical trial considerations for pediatric cancer drug development

Oncology has been one of the most active therapeutic areas in medicinal products development. Despite this fact, few drugs have been approved for use in pediatric cancer patients when compared to the number approved for adults with cancer. This disparity could be attributed to the fact that many oncology drugs have had orphan drug designation and were exempt from Pediatric Research Equity Act (PREA) requirements. On August 18, 2017, the RACE for Children Act, i.e. Research to Accelerate Cures and Equity Act, was signed into law as Title V of the 2017 FDA Reauthorization Act (FDARA) to amend the PREA. Pediatric investigation is now required if the drug or biological product is intended for the treatment of an adult cancer and directed at a molecular target that FDA determines to be "substantially relevant to the growth or progression of a pediatric cancer." This paper discusses the specific considerations in clinical trial designs and statistical methodologies to be implemented in oncology pediatric clinical programs.

Key Pharmacokinetic Parameters of 74 Pediatric Anticancer Drugs Providing Assistance in Preclinical Studies

Novel drug treatments for pediatric patients with cancer are urgently needed. Success of drug development in pediatric oncology has been promising, but many drugs still fail in translation from preclinical to clinical phases. To increase the translational potential, several improvements have been implemented, including the use of clinically achievable concentrations in the drug testing phase. Although pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of numerous investigated drugs are published, a comprehensive PK overview of the most common drugs in pediatric oncology could guide preclinical trial design and improve the translatability into clinical trials. A review of the literature was conducted for PK parameters of 74 anticancer drugs, from the drug sensitivity profiling library of the INdividualized Therapy FOr Relapsed Malignancies in Childhood (INFORM) registry. PK data in the pediatric population were reported and complemented by adult parameters when no pediatric data were available. In addition, blood-brain barrier (BBB)-penetration assessment of drugs was provided by using the BBB score. Maximum plasma concentration was available for 73 (97%), area under the plasma concentration-time curve for 69 (92%), plasma protein binding for 66 (88%), plasma half-life for 57 (76%), time to maximum concentration for 54 (72%), clearance for 52 (69%), volume of distribution for 37 (49%), lowest plasma concentration reached by the drug before the next dose administration for 21 (28%), and steady-state concentration for 4 (5%) of drugs. Pediatric PK data were available for 48 (65%) drugs. We provide a comprehensive review of PK data for 74 drugs studied in pediatric oncology. This data set can serve as a reference to design experiments more closely mimicking drug PK conditions in patients, and may thereby increase the probability of successful clinical translation.

Clinical research with targeted drugs in paediatric oncology

The development of targeted drugs in paediatric oncology has been notoriously slow, in part due to the peculiarities of this rare and highly heterogeneous population. To provide therapeutic breakthroughs for the highest risk subgroups of childhood cancer, innovative research solutions have been implemented in the last several years by different international collaborative groups and regulators. Here, we discuss and summarise some of these approaches, as well as challenges and unmet needs that are still being addressed. A wide range of topics were covered in this review including molecular diagnosis optimisation, innovative research methodologies, big data approaches, trial enrolment strategies, and improvements in regulation and preclinical research platforms.

Genomics-Driven Precision Medicine in Pediatric Solid Tumors

Over the past decades, several study programs have conducted genetic testing in cancer patients to identify potential genetic targets for the development of precision therapeutic strategies. These biomarker-driven trials have demonstrated improved clinical outcomes and progression-free survival rates in various types of cancers, especially for adult malignancies. However, similar progress in pediatric cancers has been slow due to their distinguished mutation profiles compared to adults and the low frequency of recurrent genomic alterations. Recently, increased efforts to develop precision medicine for childhood malignancies have led to the identification of genomic alterations and transcriptomic profiles of pediatric patients which presents promising opportunities to study rare and difficult-to-access neoplasms. This review summarizes the current state of known and potential genetic markers for pediatric solid tumors and provides perspectives on precise therapeutic strategies that warrant further investigations.

Racial Disparities in Renal Outcomes over Time among Hospitalized Children with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

OBJECTIVES

Racial and ethnic minority groups have excess morbidity related to renal disease in pediatric-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). We evaluated temporal trends in renal outcomes and racial disparities among hospitalized children with SLE over 14 years.

METHODS

We identified patients ≤21 years-old with discharge diagnoses of SLE in the Pediatric Health Information System® inpatient database (2006-2019). Adverse renal outcomes included end-stage renal disease (ESRD), dialysis, or transplant, analyzed as a composite and separately. We estimated the odds of adverse renal outcomes at any hospitalization, or the first occurrence of an adverse renal outcome, adjusted for calendar period, patient characteristics, and clustering by hospital. We tested whether racial disparities differed by calendar period.

RESULTS

There were 20,893 admissions for 7,434 SLE patients, of which 32%, 16%, 12% and 8% were Black, Hispanic White, Hispanic Other and Asian, respectively. Proportions of admissions with adverse renal outcomes decreased over time (p<0.01). Black children remained at highest risk of adverse renal outcomes at any admission (OR 2.5, 95% CI [1.8-3.5] vs. non-Hispanic White). Black and Asian children remained at higher risk of incident adverse renal outcomes, driven by ESRD among Black children (OR 1.6 [1.2-2.1]) and dialysis among Asians (OR 1.7 [1.1-2.7]). Relative disparities did not change significantly over time.

CONCLUSION

Significant reductions in ESRD and dialysis occurred over time for children with SLE across all racial and ethnic groups. The lack of corresponding reductions in racial disparities highlights the need for targeted interventions to achieve greater treatment benefit among higher risk groups.

Analysis of Paediatric Clinical Trial Characteristics and Activity Over 23 Years-Impact of the European Paediatric Regulation on a Single French Clinical Research Center

As unlicensed or off-label drugs are frequently prescribed in children, the European Pediatric Regulation came into force in 2007 to improve the safe use of medicinal products in the pediatric population. This present report analyzes the pediatric research trials over 23 years in a clinical research center dedicated to children and the impact of regulation. The database of trial characteristics from 1998 to 2020 was analyzed. We also searched for differences between two periods (1998-2006 and 2007-2020) and between institutional and industrial sponsors during the whole period (1998-2020). A total of 379 pediatric trials were initiated at our center, corresponding to inclusion of 7955 subjects and 19448 on-site patient visits. The trials were predominantly drug evaluation trials (n = 278, 73%), sponsored by industries (n = 216, 57%) or government/non-profit institutions (n = 163, 43%). All age groups and most subspecialties were concerned. We noted an important and regular increase in the number of trials conducted over the years, with an increased number of multinational, industrially sponsored trials. Based on the data presented, areas of improvement are discussed: (1) following ethical and regulatory approval depending on the sponsor, the mean time needed for administrative and financial agreement, validation of trial procedures allowing trial initiation at the level of the center was 6.3 and 6.5 months (periods 1 and 2, respectively) and should be reduced, (2) availability of expert research teams remain insufficient, time dedicated to research attributed to physicians should be organized and recognition of research nurses is required. The positive impact of the European Pediatric Regulation highlights the need to increase the availability of trained research teams, organized within identified multicenter international pediatric research networks.