Relationship between frailty and drug use among nursing homes residents: results from the SHELTER study

Prevalence of strong anticholinergic use in residents with and without cognitive impairment and frailty: Analysis from 106 nursing homes in 12 Asia-Pacific and European countries

PURPOSE

There is a need to balance the benefits and risks associated with strong anticholinergic medications in older adults, particularly among those with frailty and cognitive impairment. This study explored the international prevalence of strong anticholinergic medication use in residents of nursing homes with and without cognitive impairment and frailty.

METHODS

Secondary, cross-sectional analyses of data from 5,800 residents of 106 nursing homes in Australia, China, Czech Republic, England, Finland, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, and Spain were conducted. Strong anticholinergic medications were defined as medications with a score of 2 or 3 on the Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden scale. Dementia or cognitive impairment was defined as a documented diagnosis or using a validated scale. Frailty was defined using the FRAIL-NH scale as 0-2 (non-frail), 3-6 (frail) and 7-14 (most-frail). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

Overall, 17.4 % (n = 1010) residents used ≥1 strong anticholinergic medication, ranging from 1.3 % (n = 2) in China to 27.1 % (n = 147) in Italy. The most prevalent strong anticholinergics were quetiapine (n = 290, 5.0 % of all residents), olanzapine (132, 2.3 %), carbamazepine (102, 1.8 %), paroxetine (88, 1.5 %) and amitriptyline (87, 1.5 %). Prevalence was higher among residents with cognitive impairment (n = 602, 17.9 %) compared to those without (n = 408, 16.8 %), and among residents who were most frail (n = 553, 17.9 %) compared to those who were frail (n = 286, 16.5 %) or non-frail (n = 171, 17.5 %).

CONCLUSIONS

One in six residents who were most frail and living with cognitive impairment used a strong anticholinergic. However, there was a 20-fold variation in prevalence across the 12 countries. Targeted deprescribing interventions may reduce potentially avoidable medication-harm.

Prevalence of potentially inappropriate medications according to STOPP-Frail criteria in nursing home residents, the SHELTER study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) in nursing home residents across eight countries and investigate differences between residents with and without cognitive impairment, as well as those with and without life expectancy of six months or less.

METHODS AND DEIGN

The study utilized the second edition of the STOPP-Frail criteria to operationalize PIMs in the baseline assessment of nursing home residents participating in the Services and Health for Elderly in Long TERm care (SHELTER) project. The data were collected between 2009 and 2012. The project was conducted in eight countries: Czech Republic, England, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, and Israel. Cognitive impairment was measured by the cognitive performance scale (CPS). The presence of end-stage disease with a life expectancy of six months or less was recorded. The study included residents aged 60 years or older who underwent a valid medication assessment.

RESULTS

Among the 3,832 eligible residents, 87.9% had at least one PIM. Specifically, 24.3%, 23.5%, 18.8%, and 19.3% of residents had one, two, three, and four or more PIMs, respectively. On average, each person was prescribed 2.16 PIMs. Cognitively impaired residents (n = 1999) had an average of 1.96 PIMs (SD 1.49) per person, while residents with a low CPS score (n = 1783) had an average of 2.40 PIMs (SD 1.57) per person, showing a statistically significant difference (P < 0.001). Similarly, NH residents with life expectancy of six months or less had an average of 1.66 PIMs (SD 1.30), whereas those without had an average of 2.17 PIMs (SD 1.55) (p < 0.001). The average number of PIMs varied across countries, ranging from 3.23 in Finland to 2.15 in the UK (P < 0.001). Anti-platelets and aspirin were the most prescribed PIMs, accounting for over 38.0% of prescriptions.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the high prevalence of PIMs among nursing home residents. However, PIMs were somewhat lower in residents with cognitive impairment and life expectancy of six months or less. Efforts must continue to improve the rationale behind prescribing practices in nursing homes.

Symptomatic and Preventive Medication Use before and after Alzheimer's Disease Diagnosis: A 10-Year Matched Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate longitudinal changes in symptomatic and preventive medication use among community-dwelling people with and without Alzheimer's disease (AD) 5 years pre- and post-AD diagnosis.

DESIGN

Retrospective matched cohort study.

SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS

The sample comprised 58,496 people with a geriatrician/neurologist-verified AD diagnosis matched 1:1 for age, sex, and region to people without AD in Finland.

METHODS

Medication dispensing data were obtained from the Finnish Prescription Register. Prevalence of symptomatic and preventive medication use was evaluated every 6 months from 5 years pre- to post-AD diagnosis. Longitudinal changes in medication use between people with and without AD were compared using ordinal logistic regression.

RESULTS

During the 5 years pre- and post-diagnosis, there were differences in symptomatic (P < .001) and preventive (P = .006) medication use between people with and without AD. Over the 5 years pre-diagnosis, prevalence of symptomatic and preventive medications increased in both people with and without AD. During the 1 year pre-diagnosis, people with AD had a higher increase in use of ≥3 symptomatic medications (+4.4% vs +2.2%) and ≥3 preventive medications (+6.4% vs +2.9%) compared to people without AD. Over the 5 years post-diagnosis, symptomatic medication use plateaued in both people with and without AD. Meanwhile, people using ≥3 preventive medications decreased (-6.0%) in those with AD, but increased (+6.1%) in those without AD. During the follow-up period, people with AD had a larger absolute percentage increase in prevalence of antipsychotics (+22.7% vs +1.8%) and antidepressants (+19.1% vs +5.0%) than people without AD. During the same period, paracetamol and calcium supplement use increased by 31.1% and 20.4%, respectively, among people with AD. The largest absolute percentage decrease in prevalence of preventive medications over the 5 years post-diagnosis were beta-blockers (-9.8%) and statins (-7.0%) in people with AD.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

At the point of and following diagnosis, there were population-level changes in medication use among people with AD. Medication assessments during this period appear to coincide with discontinuation of preventive medications whereas minimal changes were observed in symptomatic medication use.

Deprescribing Opportunities for Frail Residents of Nursing Homes: A Multicenter Study in Australia, China, Japan, and Spain

OBJECTIVE

Deprescribing opportunities may differ across health care systems, nursing home settings, and prescribing cultures. The objective of this study was to compare the prevalence of STOPPFrail medications according to frailty status among residents of nursing homes in Australia, China, Japan, and Spain.

DESIGN

Secondary cross-sectional analyses of data from 4 cohort studies.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

A total of 1142 residents in 31 nursing homes.

METHODS

Medication data were extracted from resident records. Frailty was assessed using the FRAIL-NH scale (non-frail 0-2; frail 3-6; most-frail 7-14). Chi-square tests and prevalence ratios (PRs) were used to compare STOPPFrail medication use across cohorts.

RESULTS

In total, 84.7% of non-frail, 95.6% of frail, and 90.6% of most-frail residents received ≥1 STOPPFrail medication. Overall, the most prevalent STOPPFrail medications were antihypertensives (53.0% in China to 73.3% in Australia, P < .001), vitamin D (nil in China to 52.7% in Australia, P < .001), lipid-lowering therapies (11.1% in Japan to 38.9% in Australia, P < .001), aspirin (13.5% in Japan to 26.2% in China, P < .001), proton pump inhibitors (2.1% in Japan to 32.0% in Australia, P < .001), and antidiabetic medications (12.3% in Japan to 23.5% in China, P = .010). Overall use of antihypertensives (PR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.06-1.25), lipid-lowering therapies (PR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.45-2.18), aspirin (PR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.04-1.64), and antidiabetic medications (PR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.00-1.72) were more prevalent among non-frail and frail residents compared with most-frail residents. Antihypertensive use was more prevalent with increasing frailty in China and Japan, but less prevalent with increasing frailty in Australia. Antidiabetic medication use was less prevalent with increasing frailty in China and Spain but was consistent across frailty groups in Australia and Japan.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

There were overall and frailty-specific variations in prevalence of different STOPPFrail medications across cohorts. This may reflect differences in prescribing cultures, application of clinical practice guidelines in the nursing home setting, and clinician or resident attitudes toward deprescribing.

Polypharmacy and Antibody Response to SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in Residents of Long-Term Care Facilities: The GeroCovid Vax Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Polypharmacy is common in older adults, particularly among those living in long-term care facilities. This condition represents a marker of clinical complexity and might directly affect the immunological response. However, there are limited data on the association of polypharmacy with vaccine immunogenicity. This study evaluated the immune response to anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in older residents of long-term care facilities as a function of the number of medications used.

METHODS

In 478 long-term care facility residents participating in the GeroCovid Vax study, we assessed SARS-CoV-2 trimeric S IgG levels through chemiluminescent assays before the vaccination and after 2, 6, and 12 months. A booster dose was administered between 6- and 12-month assessments. Sociodemographic information and data on chronic diseases and medications were derived from medical records. Based on the number of daily medications, residents were classified into the no polypharmacy (zero to four medications), polypharmacy (five to nine medications), and hyperpolypharmacy (ten or more medications) groups.

RESULTS

In the sample (mean age 82.1 years, 69.2% female), 200 (41.8%) residents were taking five or fewer medications/day (no polypharmacy), 229 (47.9%) had polypharmacy, and 49 (10.3%) had hyperpolypharmacy. Using linear mixed models adjusted for potential confounders, we found that hyperpolypharmacy was associated with a steeper antibody decline after 6 months from the first vaccine dose administration (β = - 0.29, 95% confidence interval - 0.54, - 0.03, p = 0.03) than no polypharmacy, while no significant differences were observed at 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The humoral immune response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination of older residents showed only slight changes as a function of the number of medications taken. Although it seemed less durable among older residents with hyperpolypharmacy, the booster dose administration equalized such a difference.

Symptomatic and preventive medication use according to age and frailty in Australian and Japanese nursing homes

OBJECTIVE

To investigate symptomatic and preventive medication use according to age and frailty in Australian and Japanese nursing homes (NHs).

METHODS

Secondary cross-sectional analyses of two prospective cohort studies involving 12 Australian NHs and four Japanese NHs. Frailty was measured using the FRAIL-NH scale (non-frail 0-2; frail 3-6; most-frail 7-14). Regular medications were classified as symptomatic or preventive based on published lists and expert consensus. Descriptive statistics were used to compare the prevalence and ratio of symptomatic to preventive medications.

RESULTS

Overall, 550 Australian residents (87.7 ± 7.3 years; 73.3% females) and 333 Japanese residents (86.5 ± 7.0 years; 73.3% females) were included. Australian residents used a higher mean number of medications than Japanese residents (9.8 ± 4.0 vs 7.7 ± 3.7, p < 0.0001). Australian residents used more preventive than symptomatic medications (5.5 ± 2.5 vs 4.3 ± 2.6, p < 0.0001), while Japanese residents used more symptomatic than preventive medications (4.7 ± 2.6 vs 3.0 ± 2.2, p < 0.0001). In Australia, symptomatic medications were more prevalent with increasing frailty (non-frail 3.4 ± 2.6; frail 4.0 ± 2.6; most-frail 4.8 ± 2.6, p < 0.0001) but less prevalent with age (< 80 years 5.0 ± 2.9; 80-89 years 4.4 ± 2.6; ≥ 90 years 3.9 ± 2.5, p = 0.0042); while preventive medications remained similar across age and frailty groups. In Japan, there was no significant difference in the mean number of symptomatic and preventive medications irrespective of age and frailty.

CONCLUSIONS

The ratio of symptomatic to preventive medications was higher with increasing frailty but lower with age in Australia; whereas in Japan, the ratio remained consistent across age and frailty groups. Preventive medications remained prevalent in most-frail residents in both cohorts, albeit at lower levels in Japan.

Sarcopenia is associated with a greater risk of polypharmacy and number of medications: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Polypharmacy in older adults is associated with multiple negative consequences that may affect muscular function, independently from the presence of medical conditions. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the association of sarcopenia with polypharmacy and higher number of medications. A systematic literature search of observational studies using PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and Cochrane Library databases was conducted from inception until June 2022. To determine if sarcopenia is associated with a higher risk of polypharmacy and increased number of medications, a meta-analysis using a random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled effects (CRD42022337539). Twenty-nine studies were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. Sarcopenia was associated with a higher prevalence of polypharmacy (odds ratio [OR]: 1.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.23, 2.20], I2  = 84%, P < 0.01) and higher number of medications (mean difference: 1.39, 95% CI [0.59, 2.19], I2  = 95%, P < 0.01) compared with individuals without sarcopenia. Using meta-regression, a high variance was observed due to different populations (i.e., community-dwelling, nursing home residents, inpatients, outpatients) for both outcomes of polypharmacy (r = -0.338, SE = 0.1669, 95% CI [-0.67, -0.01], z = -2.03, P = 0.04) and number of medications (r = 0.589, SE = 0.2615, 95% CI [0.08, 1.10], z = 2.25, P = 0.02). This systematic review and meta-analysis reported a significantly increased risk of polypharmacy and higher number of medications in people with sarcopenia compared with individuals without this condition. Future research should clarify whether the specificity and number of medications is a direct contributor in accelerating the progression of muscle wasting and dysfunction contributing to sarcopenia in older adults.

Frailty modifies the effect of polypharmacy and multimorbidity on the risk of death among nursing home residents: Results from the SHELTER study

Background

Frailty, disability, and polypharmacy are prevalent in nursing home (NH) residents, often co-occurring with multimorbidity. There may be a complex interplay among them in terms of outcomes such as mortality. Aims of the study were to (i) assess whether nursing home residents with polypharmacy (5-9 medications) or hyperpolypharmacy (≥10 drugs), have an increased risk of death and (ii) whether any association is modified by the co-presence of frailty or disability.

Methods

Cohort study with longitudinal mortality data including 4,023 residents from 50 European and 7 Israeli NH facilities (mean age = 83.6 years, 73.2% female) in The Services and Health for Elderly in Long Term care (SHELTER) cohort study. Participants were evaluated with the interRAI-LongTerm Care assessment tool. Frailty was evaluated with the FRAIL-NH scale. Hazard ratio (HR) of death over 12 months was assessed with stratified Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for demographics, facilities, and cognitive status.

Results

1,042 (25.9%) participants were not on polypharmacy, 49.8% (n = 2,002) were on polypharmacy, and 24.3% (n = 979) on hyperpolypharmacy. Frailty and disability mostly increased risk of death in the study population (frailty: HR = 1.85, 95%CI 1.49-2.28; disability: HR = 2.10, 95%CI 1.86-2.47). Among non-frail participants, multimorbidity (HR = 1.34, 95%CI = 1.01-1.82) and hyperpolypharmacy (HR = 1.61, 95%CI = 1.09-2.40) were associated with higher risk of death. Among frail participants, no other factors were associated with mortality. Polypharmacy and multimorbidity were not associated with mortality after stratification for disability.

Conclusions

Frailty and disability are the strongest predictors of death in NH residents. Multimorbidity and hyperpolypharmacy increase mortality only in people without frailty. These findings may be relevant to identify patients who could benefit from tailored deprescription.

Prevalence and health outcomes of polypharmacy and hyperpolypharmacy in older adults with frailty: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Polypharmacy is a prevalent issue in older adults, associated with a wide range of adverse health outcomes, amplified in those with frailty. This review aims to synthesize current literature on the prevalence and health outcomes of polypharmacy and hyperpolypharmacy in older adults with frailty. A systematic search was carried out within ten databases till December 2021. Data was extracted using a piloted data extraction form, and methodological quality was assessed using JBI critical appraisal checklists. Meta-analyses were conducted for prevalence, and narrative synthesis was conducted for the health outcomes of polypharmacy and hyperpolypharmacy in older adults with frailty. Heterogeneity was assessed using Chi² and I² statistics, with sensitivity and subgroup analyses performed to explore sources of heterogeneity. Sixty-six studies were included for this review. The overall pooled prevalence of polypharmacy and hyperpolypharmacy was 59% and 22% respectively. When stratifying the studies by setting, WHO regions, in eighteen frailty assessment instruments, and by its year of publication, subgroup analysis found the highest rates of prevalence in the hospital setting (71%), in the European region (68%), when Reported Edmonton Frail Scale was used (96%), and in studies published in 2015 (86%). Additionally, frail older adults with polypharmacy were less likely to experience an improvement in frailty states, had higher risks of mortality, were more likely to suffer adverse hospital-related outcomes, and required additional assistance compared to those without polypharmacy. Therefore, the high prevalence and poorer health outcomes urges the healthcare providers and health policymakers to develop and implement preventative and restorative measures targeted at the adverse outcomes associated with polypharmacy and hyperpolypharmacy in older adults with frailty.

The Effect of Frailty Syndrome on the Quality of Life of Individuals with Parkinson's Disease: A Pilot Observational and Multicenter Study on the Polish Population

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder involving decreased dopamine release and atrophy of dopaminergic neurons of the substantia nigra. Frailty syndrome (FS) is common in older adults, which, in combination with PD symptoms, can substantially affect the quality of life (QOL). This study aimed to assess the prevalence of FS among PD patients and to identify variables affecting their QOL with particular attention to FS. The study included 296 patients (n = 173 women) with a mean age of 70.3 ± 5.7 years suffering from PD for an average of 8.2 ± 5.6 years. Patients were classified as at least stage II according to the Hoehn and Yahr scale. The following standardized questionnaires were used in the study: Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living (SE-ADL), Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), and Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI). FS was found in 96% (n = 283) of the PD patients studied. No depression occurred in 30% (n = 89) of subjects, moderate depression in 48% (n = 141) of subjects, and severe depression in 22% (n = 66) of subjects. The mean score of the PDQ-39 questionnaire in PD subjects with FS was 41.6 pts (min-max: 5.2-81.5 pts; SD = 17.4 pts), which was statistically significantly higher than in subjects without FS (p < 0.05). FS has been shown to be present in most of the subjects with PD. FS occurs more frequently with a longer PD period, which is associated with reduced physical capacity and QOL. Physical activity improves QOL and reduces disease progression. FS, similar to PD, is a common cause of disability in older adults and their dependency. Predictors such as depression, advanced stage of the disease, higher education, and low professional and economic status significantly affect the QOL level of PD patients. However, the results obtained among the Polish population of PD patients do not confirm the impact of FS on the QOL, so there is a need to conduct further research on this subject.

Frailty, multimorbidity patterns and mortality in institutionalized older adults in Italy

Background

Little is known on how frailty influences clinical outcomes in persons with specific multimorbidity patterns.

Aims

To investigate the interplay between multimorbidity and frailty in the association with mortality in older individuals living in nursing homes (NH).

Methods

We considered 4,131 NH residents aged 60 years and over, assessed through the interRAI LTCF instrument between 2014 and 2018. Follow-up was until 2019. Considering four multimorbidity patterns identified via principal component analysis, subjects were stratified in tertiles (T) with respect to their loading values. Frailty Index (FI) considered 23 variables and a cut-off of 0.24 distinguished between high and low frailty levels. For each pattern, all possible combinations of tertiles and FI were evaluated. Their association (Hazard Ratio [HR] and 95% confidence interval) with mortality was tested in Cox regression models.

Results

In the heart diseases and dementia and sensory impairments patterns, the hazard of death increases progressively with patterns expression and frailty severity (being HR T3 vs. T1 = 2.36 [2.01–2.78]; HR T3 vs. T1 = 2.12 [1.83–2.47], respectively). In heart, respiratory and psychiatric diseases and diabetes, musculoskeletal and vascular diseases patterns, frailty seems to have a stronger impact on mortality than patterns’ expression.

Discussion

Frailty increases mortality risk in all the patterns and provides additional prognostic information in NH residents with different multimorbidity patterns.

Conclusions

These findings support the need to routinely assess frailty. Older people affected by specific groups of chronic diseases need a specific care approach and have high risk of negative health outcomes.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40520-022-02269-8.

Associations Between Anticholinergic Medication Exposure and Adverse Health Outcomes in Older People with Frailty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Introduction

There are robust associations between use of anticholinergic medicines and adverse effects in older people. However, the nature of these associations for older people living with frailty is yet to be established.

Objectives

The aims were to identify and investigate associations between anticholinergics and adverse outcomes in older people living with frailty and to investigate whether exposure is associated with greater risks according to frailty status.

Methods

MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Web of Science and PsycINFO were searched to 1 August 2019. Observational studies reporting associations between anticholinergics and outcomes in older adults (average age ≥ 65 years) that reported frailty using validated measures were included. Primary outcomes were physical impairment, cognitive dysfunction, and change in frailty status. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias In Non-randomised Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool. Meta-analysis was undertaken where appropriate.

Results

Thirteen studies (21,516 participants) were included (ten community, one residential aged-care facility and two hospital studies). Observed associations included reduced ability for chair standing, slower gait speeds, poorer physical performance, increased risk of falls and mortality. Conflicting results were reported for grip strength, timed up and go test, cognition and activities of daily living. No associations were observed for transitions between frailty states, psychological wellbeing or benzodiazepine-related adverse reactions. There was no clear evidence of differences in risks according to frailty status.

Conclusions

Anticholinergics are associated with adverse outcomes in older people living with frailty; however, the literature has significant methodological limitations. There is insufficient evidence to suggest greater risks based on frailty, and there is an urgent need to evaluate this further in well-designed studies stratifying by frailty.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40801-021-00256-5.

Frailty in Parkinson's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Frailty and Parkinson's disease (PD) are common conditions that increase with age. Independently, frailty and PD lead to increased morbidity and mortality for patients. Few studies report on frailty in patients with PD. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence, associations and outcomes of frailty in persons with PD.

METHODS

We searched four electronic databases and grey literature from inception to May 19, 2020, for articles which reported the prevalence, associations and outcomes of frailty in persons with PD.

RESULTS

One-thousand and sixty-three citations were identified, of which 127 articles were reviewed. Thirty studies were included. Twenty-eight studies were observational and the settings varied including 25 community and 5 inpatient studies.The most common frailty screening measures were the frailty phenotype and clinical frailty scale. The prevalence of frailty in PD using the FP was 0.38 (0.24-0.55) with I2 = 92.6% (p < 0.01). Frailty was associated with recurrent falls, cognitive impairment, dementia, orthostatic hypotension, fatigue, hallucinations, nursing home placement, dependency in activities of daily living and in-patient mortality. PD disease duration, motor impairment, non-tremor dominant PD (postural instability/gait difficulty dominant phenotype) and total daily levodopa dose were associated with frailty.

CONCLUSION

Frailty is common in PD. There is no agreed upon tool for identifying frailty, however, the importance of its identification is apparent given the high prevalence and the association between frailty and adverse outcomes in persons with PD. Future studies are required to guide clinicians in how best to identify and manage frail patients with PD.

The FRAIL-NH Scale: Systematic Review of the Use, Validity and Adaptations for Frailty Screening in Nursing Homes

OBJECTIVES

To investigate frailty prevalence, cross-sectional associations, predictive validity, concurrent validity, and cross-cultural adaptations of the FRAIL-NH scale.

DESIGN

Systematic review.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Frail residents living in nursing homes.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library were searched from January 2015 to June 2021 for primary studies that used the FRAIL-NH scale, irrespective of study designs and publication language.

RESULTS

Overall, 40 studies conducted across 20 countries utilized the FRAIL-NH scale; majority in Australia (n=14), followed by China (n=6), United States (n=3), and Spain (n=3). The scale has been translated and back-translated into Brazilian Portuguese, Chinese, and Japanese. Various cut-offs have been used, with ≥2 and ≥6 being the most common cut-offs for frail and most frail, respectively. When defined using these cut-offs, frailty prevalence varied from 15.1-79.5% (frail) to 28.5-75.0% (most frail). FRAIL-NH predicted falls (n=2), hospitalization or length of stay (n=4), functional or cognitive decline (n=4), and mortality (n=9) over a median follow-up of 12 months. FRAIL-NH has been compared to 16 other scales, and was correlated with Fried's phenotype (FP), Frailty Index (FI), and FI-Lab. Four studies reported fair-to-moderate agreements between FRAIL-NH and FI, FP, and the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment. Ten studies assessed the sensitivity and specificity of different FRAIL-NH cut-offs, with ≥8 having the highest sensitivity (94.1%) and specificity (82.8%) for classifying residents as frail based on FI, while two studies reported an optimal cut-off of ≥2 based on FI and FP, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In seven years, the FRAIL-NH scale has been applied in 20 countries and adapted into three languages. Despite being applied with a range of cut-offs, FRAIL-NH was associated with higher care needs and demonstrated good agreement with other well-established but more complex scales. FRAIL-NH was predictive of adverse outcomes across different settings, highlighting its value in guiding care for frail residents in nursing homes.