Collaborating with Families: Exploring Family Member and Health Care Provider Perspectives on Engaging Families Within Medical Education

Power to the people? A co-produced critical review of service user involvement in mental health professions education

Meaningful service user involvement in health professions education requires integrating knowledge held by "lay" people affected by health challenges into professional theories and practices. Involving service users redefines whose knowledge "counts" and implies a shift in power. Such a shift is especially significant in the mental health field, where power imbalances between health professionals and service users are magnified. However, reviews of the literature on service user involvement in mental health professional education do little to explore how power manifests in this work. Meanwhile critical and Mad studies scholars have highlighted that without real shifts in power, inclusion practices can lead to harmful consequences. We conducted a critical review to explore how power is addressed in the literature that describes service user involvement in mental health professions education. Our team used a co-produced approach and critical theories to identify how power implicitly and explicitly operates in this work to unearth the inequities and power structures that service user involvement may inadvertently perpetuate. We demonstrate that power permeates service user involvement in mental health professional education but is rarely made visible. We also argue that by missing the opportunity to locate power, the literature contributes to a series of epistemic injustices that reveal the contours of legitimate knowledge in mental health professions education and its neoliberal underpinnings. Ultimately, we call for a critical turn that foregrounds power relations to unlock the social justice-oriented transformative potential of service user involvement in mental health professions education and health professions education more broadly.

A 1-Day Training Course to Disseminate the BREF Psychoeducational Program to Caregivers and Promote Network Establishment between Psychiatry Departments and Family Associations

OBJECTIVE

Although international guidelines state that psychoeducation to caregivers should be provided systematically, it remains insufficiently available in psychiatry. This study reports the development and evaluation of an original training course aimed to provide participants with the knowledge and skills to implement "BREF," a psychoeducational program for caregivers.

METHODS

The BREF program training course, a free, 1-day course incorporating peer role-play was developed. In addition to psychiatrists, nurses, and psychologists, caregivers were involved as preceptors. Participants were mental health professionals and volunteer caregivers. Participants to the first 28 sessions of the course (n=467) completed a post-course questionnaire (n=341) and a cross-sectional questionnaire (n=56). Quantitative data on satisfaction, learning, and behavior changes following the course were collected equating to levels 1, 2, and 3 of Kirkpatrick's model.

RESULTS

After the course, high levels of satisfaction and commitment were observed with 100% of responders recommending the course and 81% intending to implement the BREF program. Confidence mean score to implement BREF was 7.9/10 (±1.4) with no significant effect of course session. At cross-sectional evaluation, 73% of responders reported improvements in skills related to providing psychoeducation to caregivers, 64% stated that the BREF program was implemented/under implementation, and 66% stated that their department had connected with a family association.

CONCLUSIONS

Training course sessions alone can increase psychoeducational programs for caregivers and network establishment. The BREF program training course demonstrates a high level of participant satisfaction and is a promising method to disseminate psychoeducation to caregivers, thus addressing a major shortage in mental health organization.

A parent-led, patient-centered medical home model instruction for interprofessional undergraduate and graduate learning opportunities

INTRODUCTION

Despite national efforts to establish patient-centered medical homes (PCMH), 57.3% of children with special health care needs are receiving care that does not meet medical home criteria. Project DOCC, a national curriculum designed by parents of children with disabilities or chronic disease, has shown documented strengths in medical resident learner education of children with special health care needs from the parent perspectives for over a decade. Because of the importance of PCMH and the need to provide compassionate care, our team adapted the curriculum to incorporate team-based learning in the rural setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Reading materials were distributed to learners prior to an in-person workshop at which time, learners reviewed a video and discussed PCMH materials to identify elements of the PCMH. Learners then engaged with parent mentors across three breakout sessions. A final group reflection was completed to review and discuss efforts providers would take to establish and maintain the PCMH in their own practice. Baseline and post-workshop PCMH perceptions and parent mentor reflections were collected and compared using t-test comparisons.

RESULTS

Learner knowledge, perceptions, and comfort significantly increased after the workshop. Parent mentor comments also highlighted an increased understanding for the provider. Discussion: The adapted PCMH curriculum significantly impacted learner outcomes using a feasible approach that fit nicely within health professional curricula and limited resources of the rural setting. Parents enjoyed the opportunity to serve as mentors and valued the instruction format.

Patient Partners in Continuing Professional Development: Experience Developing an End-of-Life Care Program for Family Physicians

Involvement of patients in continuing professional development (CPD) is less developed than in health professional education at undergraduate or postgraduate levels. Although patients are sometimes involved in delivering CPD, they are less likely to be involved in education planning. At our institution, patients have sometimes acted as consultants in the design of CPD. The problem we address is how to engage patients as partners throughout the design process. We applied principles of authentic patient engagement and lessons learned from patient involvement in undergraduate health professional education to the design of CPD for family physicians. We created a partnership between the CPD Office and Patient and Community Partnership for Education, a unit with a history of patient involvement in the education of health professional students. Practices for meaningful involvement were identified through literature review, environmental scan, and interviewing key informants, including patients involved in health professional education at the university. These principles and practices were applied to the development of a CPD module on end-of-life care. Patient partners contributed new perspectives and some CPD providers reassessed components of their own practice as a result. Lessons learned include the need for stakeholder buy-in; mechanisms to identify those patients best able to contribute expertise; ways to facilitate involvement that work for both patients and CPD providers; the importance of feedback mechanisms to patient partners; and recognition for patient contributions. CPD offices should view integration of patient partners in program planning as an opportunity to engage in ongoing quality improvement.

Parents of adult children with long-term mental disorder: Their experiences of the mental health professionals' approach and feelings of alienation - A cross sectional study

The aim was to describe how parents of adult children suffering from long-term mental disorder experience the mental health professionals' approach and any feelings of alienation regarding the provision of care. A further aim was to investigate any differences according to the parents' gender or the child's age. 93 mothers and 37 fathers participated. A majority experienced the mental health professionals' approach toward them as being negative and they felt alienated from the professional care. Regardless of the age of the children, parents have a considerable need for a positive approach from the professionals that can enable them to choose how they should act and what they should do, in order to help and support their adult child.

Where is the family voice? Examining the relational dimensions of the family- healthcare professional and its perceived impact on patient care outcomes in mental health and addictions

BACKGROUND

We explored the relationship between family members and healthcare professionals (HCPs), specifically how family members can influence the course and outcome of patient care for youth. Exploring this under-researched area provided an opportunity to understand the tripartite relationship between the family, the youth experiencing mental health problems or substance use concerns and their HCP.

METHODS

A qualitative research design was used to gain a full understanding of how family members experience relationships with HCPs. We interviewed 21 family members using semi-structure questions to explore the type of relationships formed between HCPs and family members throughout a patient's course of care, the family member's perceived role in the care of their youth accessing mental health or addiction services and the family member's awareness of formalized structures (i.e., hospital rules, policies) and resources that support family involvement.

RESULTS

Within a relationship-centred framework, four themes, with various sub-themes emerged from the interviews: 1) The family member-HCP relationship regarding creating a positive impression, being an extension of the patient and the discovery of "pink flags"; 2) The family member-youth-HCP relationship regarding the receptivity of youth to family involvement and a youth's individual right to privacy; 3)The family member's relationship to self with regard to the situation being a family illness; and 4) The family member's relationship with friends, family and peers regarding the feelings of loneliness, stigma and shame and the lack of understanding about mental health problems and substance use.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study provided in-depth information about the importance of family involvement in the care and health outcomes of youth who are accessing mental health and addiction services. Family members experienced and conceptualized their relationships with HCPs, their youth, themselves and their friends and peers as active interactions that influenced the course and outcomes of care. Future studies are needed to collect the multiple perspectives of youth and HCPs alongside with the family perspectives.