Family First: Asian Americans' Attitudes and Behaviors Toward Deceased Organ Donation

Family consent to deceased organ donation in China: a participatory qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Organ donation improves patient survival and quality of life, yet family refusal is a major barrier. This study aimed to explore the role of family discussions in shaping attitudes and decisions about organ donation in China, while also examining the influencing factors at the individual, family, community and societal levels.

METHOD

Participatory interviews with family members were conducted based on the social-ecological model (SEM). A snowball sampling strategy was adopted to recruit volunteer interviewers. Of 52 interviewers, 25 completed the family group interviews, involving 94 participants in total. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim within 24 hours. Two researchers coded the data in line with SEM. Themes were identified through an inductive process.

RESULTS

Four themes were identified out of family discussions about deceased organ donation: (i) individual perceptions on the value of lives and organ donation (value of organ donation, death attitudes, knowledge about organ donation), (ii) family consensus and conflicts (family structure, family altruism), (iii) collective conformity (conformity, individualism, negativity bias) and (IV) culture and social environment (traditional beliefs, incentive policy, education, media promotion).

CONCLUSION

This study is the first to systematically examine the factors influencing deceased organ donation in the Chinese family context. Obtaining family consent for organ donation appears to be challenging in Chinese families due to limited knowledge and traditional beliefs. Incentive policies that benefit the family are crucial. While media promotion is effective in increasing awareness of organ donation, education and family discussions are critical in alleviating fears and misunderstandings about deceased organ donation.

What factors influence patient autonomy in healthcare decision-making? A systematic review of studies from the Global South

BackgroundThe principle of respect for autonomy (PRA) is a central tenet of bioethics. In the quest for a global bioethics, it is pertinent to ask whether this principle can be applied as it is to cultures and societies that are devoid of the Western sociopolitical historical pressures that led to its emergence. Relational autonomists have argued for a more inclusive approach to patient autonomy which takes into account factors such as interdependency and social relations. However, at the outset of any relational approach, it is necessary to identify underlying factors that influence patient autonomy in non-Western cultures.ObjectiveTo conduct a review of the literature to uncover the mechanisms through which social, cultural, and religious factors influence and impact the application of the PRA in healthcare decision-making in non-Western cultures and societies.MethodsWe conducted a systematic review through a comprehensive search of three major electronic databases of biomedical sciences. Returned citations were imported to Covidence, full texts were assessed for eligibility, included articles were thoroughly reviewed and data was synthesized. PRISMA guidelines were followed.ResultsOur search retrieved 590 non-duplicate results, 50 of which were included after screening and full-text eligibility checks. The included studies were predominantly qualitative in nature, with few quantitative, mixed-methods, and review studies included. Our synthesis of data identified nine key factors that influenced patients' autonomous decision-making through cultural, social, religious, or intersectional pathways.ConclusionTwo main conclusions emerge from this review. Firstly, there is a notable dearth of bioethical research examining the influence of diverse factors on patients' inclination towards different conceptions of autonomy. Secondly, the analysis of prevalent collectivist cultures and deference of autonomy adds value to the solution-oriented relational autonomy debate. This raises questions regarding how decision-making can be truly autonomous in the presence of such large-scale factors, warranting further attention.

Reconsidering autonomy: Asian Americans' use of relational autonomy in organ donation decisions

BACKGROUND

As cultural contexts have gained increasing relevance in medical decision-making, the current mainstream definition of autonomy is insufficient. A viable alternative framework, relational autonomy posits that agents' actions are influenced by and embedded in society and culture rather than occurring in isolation. To test the concept's applicability, we examine whether Asian Americans in the study's sample operationalize relational autonomy as a decisional approach in hypothetical scenarios about organ donation, a practice for which there is considerably lower enthusiasm compared to other racial groups in the US.

METHODS

A national sample of Asian American adults were recruited from a Qualtrics research panel. Participants completed a Think-Aloud interview containing scenarios in which they decide whether or not to: (1) become a registered donor at the motor vehicle department; (2) authorize organ donation for a close relative who unexpectedly died. The interview first elicited candid reactions to the scenarios, followed by probing participants' rationale of their initial responses. Participants' final decision to each scenario (whether or not to register; whether or not consent to surrogate authorization), as well as participants' decisional approaches (individualistic vs. relational) were coded using the constant comparison method.

RESULTS

The sample (n = 40) mirrored the largest proportions of Asian Americans in the US; the plurality identified as Chinese (35%), Filipino (27.5%) and Indian (25%). In response to the organ donor registration prompt, a majority of respondents (57.5%) expressed they would employ the mainstream decisional approach of individualistic autonomy, and 42.5% would make the decision with a relational approach. In contrast, when responding to the surrogate authorization prompt, the majority (77.5%) described a relational approach when making the decision, to preserve familial harmony and honor their cultural heritage.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of individualistic and relational autonomy frameworks are situational for some individuals. Participants acknowledged the impact of personal, cultural, and societal elements on their decisional approach. The concept of relational autonomy has utility through its versatility in complex decision-making events and by accounting for multiple stakeholders without privileging the autonomy of a single decision-maker over others.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

Not applicable.

Do ethical views of end-of-life patients' family members impact organ donation decisions?

Background: The relatives of patients who decide to donate their loved one's organs experience dilemmas about organ donation and are affected by culture, religion, and individual views.Aim: The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between the ethical position and personal characteristics of the family members of the patients receiving end-of-life care and their thoughts about organ donation in Turkey.Research design and participants: The study was completed with 158 family members. For data collection, a personal information form and the Ethics Position Questionnaire were used.Ethical considerations: This study was obtained from the ethics committee of the faculty of medicine in Turkey. It was based on voluntary participation, informed consent, confidentiality, and anonymity.Results: All participants in the study shared the same faith and were Muslims. The idealism and relativism tendencies of the participants tended to be high. The number of children, the participants have, participants' status of waiting for an organ transplant, the view that the clergy and health personnel will increase interest in organ donation were identified as factors associated with idealism tendencies. Participants' status of having children, the number of children participants have, participants' status of organ transplant waiting, the view that the health personnel will increase interest in organ donation were identified as factors associated with relativism tendencies (p < 0.0.5).Conclusion: The results of this study demonstrated a relationship between participants' idealism and relativism tendencies, among those with a large number of children, waiting for organ donation, advocating for clergy guidance to increase organ donations, and believing healthcare professionals need not guide to increase organ donations. In light of this finding, it may be recommended to establish a multidisciplinary team, including healthcare professionals and clergy, and to inform the society with accurate information to increase the number of organ donations.

Reconsidering Autonomy: Asian Americans' Use of Relational Autonomy in Organ Donation Decisions

Background

As cultural contexts have gained increasing relevance in medical decision-making, the current mainstream definition of autonomy is insufficient. A viable alternative framework, relational autonomy posits that agents' actions are influenced by and embedded in society and culture rather than occurring in isolation. To test the concept's applicability, we examine whether Asian Americans in the study's sample operationalize relational autonomy as a decisional approach in hypothetical scenarios about organ donation, a practice for which there is considerably lower enthusiasm compared to other racial groups in the US.

Methods

A national sample of Asian American adults were recruited from Qualtrics research panel. Participants completed a Think-Aloud interview containing scenarios in which they decide whether or not to: 1) become a registered donor at the motor vehicle department; 2) authorize organ donation for a close relative who unexpectedly died. The interview first elicited candid reactions to the scenarios, followed by probing participants' rationale of their initial responses. Participants' final decision to each scenario (whether or not to register; whether or not consent to surrogate authorization), as well as participants' decisional approaches (individualistic vs relational) were coded using the constant comparison method.

Results

The sample (n = 40) mirrored the largest proportions of Asian Americans in the US; the plurality identified as Chinese (35%), Filipino (27.5%) and Indian (25%). In response to the organ donor registration prompt, a majority of respondents (57.5%) expressed they would employ the mainstream decisional approach of individualistic autonomy, and 42.5% would make the decision with a relational approach. In contrast, when responding to the surrogate authorization prompt, the majority (77.5%) described a relational approach when making the decision, to preserve familial harmony and honor their cultural heritage.

Conclusions

Use of individualistic and relational autonomy frameworks are situational for some individuals. Participants acknowledged the impact of personal, cultural, and societal elements on their decisional approach. The concept of relational autonomy has utility through its versatility in complex decision-making events and by accounting for multiple stakeholders without privileging the autonomy of a single decision-maker over others.

Racial and Gender Disparities in Transplantation of Hepatitis C+ Hearts and Lungs

BACKGROUND

Transplanting organs from hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected donors into HCV-negative recipients has led to thousands of more transplants in the United States since 2016. Studies have demonstrated disparities in utilization of kidneys from these donors due to gender and education. It is still unknown, however, if the same disparities are seen in heart and lung transplantation.

METHODS

We used Organ Procurement and Transplantation/United Network for Organ Sharing data on all isolated heart and lung transplants from November 1, 2018, to March 31, 2023, classifying donors based on their HCV nucleic acid test (NAT) result: HCV-NAT- vs HCV-NAT+. We fit separate mixed-effects logistic regression models (outcome: HCV-NAT+ donor) for heart and lung transplants. Primary covariates included (1) race/ethnicity, (2) sex, (3) education level, (4) insurance type, and (5) transplant year.

RESULTS

The study included 26,108 adults (14,189 isolated heart transplant recipients and 11,919 isolated lung transplant recipients). A total of 993 (7.0%) heart transplants involved an HCV-NAT+ donor, compared to 457 (3.8%) lung transplants. In multivariable models among all isolated heart transplant recipients, women were significantly less likely to receive an HCV-NAT+ donor heart (odds ratio [OR]: 0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.67-0.92, p = 0.003), as were Asian patients (OR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.31-0.86, p = 0.01). In multivariable models among all isolated lung transplant recipients, Asians were significantly less likely to receive HCV-NAT+ transplants (OR: 0.31, 95% CI: 0.12-0.77, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

There are disparities in utilization of heart and lungs from HCV-NAT+ donors, with women and Asian patients being significantly less likely to receive these transplants.

Impact of demographic factors on corneal donor recovery

PURPOSE

Death-to-preservation time (DTP) is a commonly reported, but infrequently studied, measure of efficiency for the corneal tissue procurement process and is a key screening component for corneal tissue suitability for transplantation. It is unknown whether demographic factors such as race, age, or gender may affect DTP.

METHODS

This retrospective cross-sectional study included all deceased-donor eye tissue collected by CorneaGen Eye Banks between June 1, 2012 and June 30, 2016. Exposure variables of race, age, and gender were independently analyzed with the outcome variable, DTP, using three simple linear regression analyzes. Associations were then confirmed by a multiple linear regression analysis within a single model.

RESULTS

A total of 24,138 unique donors were identified from 48,207 donor eyes. Simple linear regression analysis showed that relative to White donors, Black and Hispanic donors were associated with a 2.40 h (95% CI 2.07-2.74 h, p < 0.001) and 2.48 h (95% CI 2.15-2.80 h, p < 0.001) longer mean DTP, respectively. DTP decreased with increasing age, at a rate of 30 min per every 10 years (95% CI 27-33 min, p < 0.001). Male donors were associated with a 35 min (95% CI 26-44 min, p < 0.001) longer DTP relative to female donors. A multiple linear regression confirmed the results of the three simple linear regressions.

CONCLUSIONS

In a large cohort of corneal donors, non-White race, younger age, and male gender were associated with longer DTP.

A Critical Ethnographic Study of Families of Brain-Dead Patients: Their Experiences and Attitudes to Organ Donation

Background

Despite the difficulty of making decisions providing facilitating mediators and removing barriers to making decisions about choosing the right path to donate the organs of brain-dead patients by families can assist in improving the services and help the lives of fellow human beings. This study aimed to explain the decision-making mediator for organ donation in families with brain-dead patients in a cultural context.

Materials and Methods

This qualitative study with a critical ethnographic approach was conducted based on Carspecken's stages from August 2021 to March 2022. In this regard, 22 participants were selected through the purposive sampling method and considering the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Sampling was continued until data saturation. After obtaining the required ethical approval, data collection was performed through observation, semi-structured interviews, and document review. All data were recorded and managed using MAXQDA 18 software.

Results

Based on the results, the main themes and subthemes of this study included "inefficient decision-making mediator" (the shadow of the socioeconomic situation on the medical status of organ recipients, as well as pessimistic influential individuals, social accountability, dialect difference, and ethnic beliefs) and "efficient decision-making mediator" (social learning, material, and spiritual motivation, mother role, and divine reward).

Conclusions

The results of this study, derived from a cultural context, can be applied to carrying out future applied and empirical research. Moreover, they can be used in the field of various nursing roles, especially management, care, and education.

Organ Donation Willingness Among Asian Americans: Results from a National Study

Asian Americans are the fastest growing racial group in the USA, but their health disparities are often overlooked. Although their needs for transplantable organs are substantial, they have the lowest rates of organ donation per million compared to other Americans by race. To better understand Asian Americans' disposition toward organ donation, a self-administered survey was developed based on formative data collection and guidance from a Community Advisory Board composed of Asian American stakeholders. The instrument was deployed online, and quota sampling based on the 2017 American Community Survey was used to achieve a sample representative (N = 899) of the Asian American population. Bivariate tests using logistic regression and the chi-square test of independence were performed. Over half (58.1%) of respondents were willing to be organ donors. A majority (81.8%) expressed a willingness to donate a family member's organs, but enthusiasm depended on the family member's donor wishes. Only 9.5% of respondents indicated that the decision to donate their organs was theirs alone to make; the remainder would involve at least one other family member. Other key sociodemographic associations were found. This study demonstrates both the diversity of Asian Americans but also the centrality of the family's role in making decisions about organ donation. Practice and research considerations for the field are also presented.

Adaptive Content Tuning of Social Network Digital Health Interventions Using Control Systems Engineering for Precision Public Health: Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Social media has emerged as an effective tool to mitigate preventable and costly health issues with social network interventions (SNIs), but a precision public health approach is still lacking to improve health equity and account for population disparities.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to (1) develop an SNI framework for precision public health using control systems engineering to improve the delivery of digital educational interventions for health behavior change and (2) validate the SNI framework to increase organ donation awareness in California, taking into account underlying population disparities.

METHODS

This study developed and tested an SNI framework that uses publicly available data at the ZIP Code Tabulation Area (ZCTA) level to uncover demographic environments using clustering analysis, which is then used to guide digital health interventions using the Meta business platform. The SNI delivered 5 tailored organ donation-related educational contents through Facebook to 4 distinct demographic environments uncovered in California with and without an Adaptive Content Tuning (ACT) mechanism, a novel application of the Proportional Integral Derivative (PID) method, in a cluster randomized trial (CRT) over a 3-month period. The daily number of impressions (ie, exposure to educational content) and clicks (ie, engagement) were measured as a surrogate marker of awareness. A stratified analysis per demographic environment was conducted.

RESULTS

Four main clusters with distinctive sociodemographic characteristics were identified for the state of California. The ACT mechanism significantly increased the overall click rate per 1000 impressions (β=.2187; P<.001), with the highest effect on cluster 1 (β=.3683; P<.001) and the lowest effect on cluster 4 (β=.0936; P=.053). Cluster 1 is mainly composed of a population that is more likely to be rural, White, and have a higher rate of Medicare beneficiaries, while cluster 4 is more likely to be urban, Hispanic, and African American, with a high employment rate without high income and a higher proportion of Medicaid beneficiaries.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed SNI framework, with its ACT mechanism, learns and delivers, in real time, for each distinct subpopulation, the most tailored educational content and establishes a new standard for precision public health to design novel health interventions with the use of social media, automation, and machine learning in a form that is efficient and equitable.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NTC04850287; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04850287.

Organ and Tissue Donation Consent Model and Intent to Donate Registries: Recommendations From an International Consensus Forum

Consent model and intent to donate registries are often the most public facing aspects of an organ and tissue donation and transplantation (OTDT) system. This article describes the output of an international consensus forum designed to give guidance to stakeholders considering reform of these aspects of their system.

Methods

This Forum was initiated by Transplant Québec and cohosted by the Canadian Donation and Transplantation Program partnered with multiple national and international donation and transplantation organizations. This article describes the output of the consent and registries domain working group, which is 1 of 7 domains from this Forum. The domain working group members included administrative, clinical, and academic experts in deceased donation consent models in addition to 2 patient, family, and donor partners. Topic identification and recommendation consensus was completed over a series of virtual meetings from March to September 2021. Consensus was achieved by applying the nominal group technique informed by literature reviews performed by working group members.

Results

Eleven recommendations were generated and divided into 3 topic groupings: consent model, intent to donate registry structure, and consent model change management. The recommendations emphasized the need to adapt all 3 elements to the legal, societal, and economic realities of the jurisdiction of the OTDT system. The recommendations stress the importance of consistency within the system to ensure that societal values such as autonomy and social cohesion are applied through all levels of the consent process.

Conclusions

We did not recommend one consent model as universally superior to others, although considerations of factors that contribute to the successful deployment of consent models were discussed in detail. We also include recommendations on how to navigate changes in the consent model in a way that preserves an OTDT system's most valuable resource: public trust.

United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) Database Analysis of Factors Associated With Kidney Transplant Time on Waiting List

INTRODUCTION

 In the United States (U.S.), African Americans and other minority groups have longer wait times for kidney transplantation than Caucasians. To date, many studies analyzing time spent on the waitlist for each race/ethnicity have been done. However, there are few to no studies examining waitlist time after the 2019 policy changes to the geographic distribution of donated kidneys.

METHODS

Data collected from the National Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database were used to analyze associations between race and time spent on the waitlist for a kidney transplant in the U.S. Additional sub-categorical data were analyzed to determine further associations and potential covariates, such as gender, age, citizenship, primary source of payment, region of transplant center, BMI, Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI), renal diagnosis, and presence/type of diabetes. Data were analyzed using odds ratios and validated by Bonferroni-Holm's corrected chi-square tests at confidence intervals of 95% to determine if there are statistically significant differences between transplant time spent on the waitlist and ethnicity, as well as age, diagnosis category, region of transplant center, and KDPI.

RESULTS

Statistically significant increased odds of remaining on the transplant list at two years existed for all non-white races/ethnicities, except those identifying as multiracial. Asian American candidates had the greatest odds of remaining on the waitlist greater than two years in comparison to white candidates: 1.51 times that of a patient categorized as white (odds ratio [OR] 1.51, confidence interval [CI] 1.44-1.57). African American/Black, (OR 1.38, CI 1.34-1.43) Pacific Islander (OR 1.38, CI 1.17-1.63), Hispanic candidates (OR 1.37, CI 1.32-1.41), and American Indian or Native Alaskan candidates (OR 1.23, CI 1.12-1.46) also had increased odds of remaining on the transplant waitlist greater than two years compared to white candidates.

DISCUSSION

In this study, ethnic disparities persisted as a barrier for non-white individuals receiving treatment for end-stage kidney disease, specifically in the context of time spent on the waitlist for a kidney transplant. Further research is needed regarding the causes of these disparities in time spent on the waitlist, such as cultural restrictions in organ donation, racial differences in parameters for organ match, and institutionalized racism in health care practitioners.

Improving equity in kidney transplant allocation policies through a novel genetic metric: The Matched Donor Potential

The demand for donors' kidneys continues to increase amid a shortage of available donors. Managing policies to thoughtfully allocate this scarce resource is a complex process. Although human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matching has been shown to prolong graft survival, its relative contribution to allocation schemes is empirically compromised owing to competing priorities. We explored using a new metric, Matched Donor Potential (MDP), to facilitate improved HLA matching while promoting equity. We interrogated all active kidney waitlist patients (N = 164 427), their corresponding unacceptable antigen files, and all effective donors in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (January 1, 2016-December 31, 2017). Cause-specific hazard functions were evaluated to assess the potential impact of the MDP metric on deceased donor transplant access rates for all candidates. Access was affected by ethnicity, blood group type, and calculated Panel Reactive Antibody (cPRA). Importantly, we show that access to transplantation is influenced by the patient's own HLA makeup regardless of their ethnicity and by the HLA makeup of effective donors. The MDP metric demonstrates a high association with access to transplantation. Adjusting Cox models to include this new metric resulted in improved access to kidney transplantation for waitlist candidates of minority heritage while significantly promoting HLA matching. Thus, the MDP metric accounts for balanced, equitable organ allocation algorithms.

An Interpretive Approach to Religious Ambiguities around Medical Innovations: The Spanish Catholic Church on Organ Donation and Transplantation (1954-2014)

How do institutionalized religions solve moral ambiguities around controversial medical innovations and public health issues? Most religions have moral guidelines about what can and cannot be done to people's bodies, but these guidelines are not always straightforward and, when faced with certain scientific advances, can come into contradiction with other doctrinal principles. I address this theoretical puzzle through the empirical case of the Spanish Catholic Church's discourse on organ donation and transplantation during the second half of the twentieth century. Drawing on an interpretive analysis of official statements by the Spanish Catholic Church, and of the media coverage of the religious debate over organ donation and transplantation in Spain from 1954 onwards, I show that the first experiments in organ transplantation faced the Church with a contradiction between its altruistic teachings and its beliefs in the sacredness of human life. Faced with an interpretive dilemma, the Church produced a context-specific version of its official doctrine friendly to organ donation and transplantation. It did so by activating its altruistic elements and suppressing sacralized meanings of the body, thus aligning organ donation with Catholic values of generosity and fraternal love. My study theorizes this moral alignment as a semantic overlap realized through historically situated institutional discourse. Additionally, it incorporates 24 primary and secondary sources on comparative cases to propose three facilitating factors that enabled and encouraged the Spanish Catholic Church to embrace a controversial medical practice.

A mixed-methods examination of public attitudes toward vascularized composite allograft donation and transplantation

Background:

This mixed-methods study examined the general public’s knowledge and attitudes about vascularized composite allografts. The availability of these anatomical gifts to treat individuals with severe disfiguring injuries relies largely on decisions made by family members. If vascularized composite allograft transplantation is to become more readily available, the knowledge and beliefs of the general public must be explored to ensure vascularized composite allograft donation approaches adequately support the donation decision-making process.

Methods:

We conducted six focus groups with 53 members of the general public, which were audio-recorded for accuracy and transcribed. Before each session, participants completed a brief survey assessing donation-related knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs. Analysis of qualitative data entailed the constant comparison method in the development and application of a schema for thematic coding. Descriptive statistics and Spearman’s rank coefficient were used in the analysis of the quantitative data.

Results:

Respondents were most knowledgeable about solid organ donation and least knowledgeable about vascularized composite allograft donation. Six major themes emerged: (1) strong initial reactions toward vascularized composite allografts, (2) limited knowledge of and reservations about vascularized composite allografts, (3) risk versus reward in receiving a vascularized composite allograft, (4) information needed to authorize vascularized composite allograft donation, (5) attitudes toward donation, and (6) mistrust of the organ donation system.

Conclusion:

The general public has low levels of knowledge and high levels of hesitation about vascularized composite allograft donation and transplantation. Education campaigns to familiarize the general public with vascularized composite allografts and specialized training for donation professionals to support informed family decision-making about vascularized composite allograft donation may address these issues.

Culturally Tailored and Community-Based Social Media Intervention to Promote Organ Donation Awareness among Asian Americans: "Heart of Gold"

Organ donation disparities among ethnic minorities have persisted for decades, especially among Asian Americans (AAs). AAs represent a substantial proportion of the national transplant waitlist but have historically had the lowest organ donation rate in the United States. Community based and culturally tailored (CBCT) interventions are needed to increase donor designation within AA communities. In collaboration with local AA organizations and representatives and national partners, we developed a culturally and linguistically tailored video using a family appeal to promote donor designation among AAs. The video was distributed on social media platforms in two stages from February 17 to September 17, 2021 and tracked Reaches, Impressions, Views, and Engagements as part of a larger evaluation. The results revealed higher social media activities and engagements on Facebook than on Instagram with and without paid advertisements, although the paid approach yielded 5 to 16 times higher viewer engagement. Over six months, the video reached 36,845 AAs and gained 53,308 Impressions, 20,139 Views, 2,455 Engagements, and 232 visits to the organ donation registration page. The findings indicated Facebook and CBCT approaches as effective communication strategies to potentially raise AAs' organ donation awareness, especially among AA females over 45 years of age. Implications and limitations are discussed.

A Qualitative Study in Family Units on Organ Donation: Attitude, Influencing Factors and Communication Patterns

This study aimed to analyze the attitude, influencing factors and communication patterns of organ donation in Chinses families. We conducted in-depth interviews with 97 participants from 26 families in China from August 2018 to October 2020. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed by the researchers. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the data and Nvivo 12 was used to catalog coded data. Thirty-eight participants indicated that they would like to be a donor while the majority were unlikely to donate. Among those who were willing to donate, some disagreed with family members to donate organs. Themes found included attitude, the timing of thinking, taboo and fear, traditional beliefs, ethics and family communication patterns. Lack of knowledge, fear, taboo, some traditional beliefs and mistrust may discourage donation. Altruism and policy which is good for the family seem to encourage donation. We also constructed three family communication patterns to provide a deeper understanding of the family in China. This is the first qualitative study that analyzed attitude, influencing factors and communication patterns based on family units in China mainland. Our findings showed that family comes first in Chinese. We suggest that family-based consent and incentives are more suitable for the Chinese social context.

Factors that Influence Organ Donor Registration Among Asian American Physicians in Queens, New York

Organ donation rates in the United States are lowest among Asians. Physicians are highly respected in Asian communities and may be influential in promoting donor registration, but little is known about their organ donor registration attitudes. We assessed associations between knowledge, attitudes, personal/professional experience, cultural/religious beliefs surrounding organ donation and donor registration status using multivariable logistic regression. We surveyed 121 Asian physicians in Queens, New York; 22% were registered donors. Registered donors were more likely to discuss donation wishes with their family (OR 9.47, 95% CI 2.60-34.51), know that donor human leukocyte antigen does not need to match organ recipients (OR 6.47, 95% CI 1.66-25.28), and have experience advising patients about organ donation (OR 5.35, 95% CI 1.50-19.02). Culturally tailored educational materials providing updated information to promote family discussion about organ donation could potentially increase Asian physicians' level of comfort and expertise in discussing organ donor registration with patients.

Opinions of healthcare students on organ and tissue donation for transplantation

OBJECTIVES

to analyze the opinions of healthcare students on organ and tissue donation for transplantation.

METHODS

qualitative document analysis study, using the records of a database and analyzing data from two perspectives: 1) Lexical analysis, with the IRAMUTEQ software, and 2) Thematic content analysis.

RESULTS

from the analysis, 3 main categories were generated: 1) Organ and tissue donation as an act of love for others and an opportunity of a new beginning; 2) Clarification and awareness on organ and tissue donation; and 3) Importance of communicating the family and promoting organ and tissue donation.

FINAL CONSIDERATIONS

despite being in favor of donation, students also recognize the presence of social taboos; the discussion in the family nucleus, promoting the theme and raising awareness in society are considered important. Additionally, the education of students is one of the possibilities of intervention for the issue.

Predictors of Deceased Organ Donation in the Pediatric Population

BACKGROUND

A shortage of donor organs represents the major barrier to the success of solid organ transplantation. This is especially true in the pediatric population for which the number of organ donors has decreased over time. With this study, we aimed to assess the factors associated with deceased organ donor consent in the pediatric population and determine the variability in consent rates across organ procurement organizations (OPOs).

METHODS

All eligible pediatric deaths were identified from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (2008-2019). The rate of organ donor consent was determined, and multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the factors independently associated with successful donor recruitment. The probability of donor consent was determined for each OPO after adjusting for patient demographics.

RESULTS

A total of 11 829 eligible pediatric deaths were approached to request consent for organ donation. Consent was successful in 8816 (74.5%) subjects. Consent rates are lower in the pediatric population compared with young adults and are directly related to patient age such that eligible infant deaths have the lowest rate of successful donor consent. There is significant variability in donor consent rates across OPOs, independent of population demographic differences.

CONCLUSIONS

OPO is predictive of pediatric deceased organ donor consent independent of demographic differences, with some regions having consistently higher consent rates than others. Sharing best practices for pediatric deceased donor recruitment may be a strategy to increase organ availability in the pediatric population.

Long-Term Outcomes and Prognosticators of Pediatric Primary Dilated Cardiomyopathy in an Asian Cohort

Background: Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is the most common childhood cardiomyopathy. The epidemiological profiles and prognosticators of clinical outcomes in Asian populations are not well elucidated. Methods: Data of 104 children aged <18 years with a diagnosis of primary DCM from January 1990 to December 2019 in our institutional database were retrospectively investigated. Relevant demographic, echocardiographic, and clinical variables were recorded for analysis. A P <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The median age at diagnosis was 1.4 years (interquartile range = 0.3-9.1 years), and 52.9% were males. During a median follow-up duration of 4.8 years, 48 patients (46.2%) were placed on the transplantation waitlist, and 52.1% of them eventually received heart transplants. An exceptionally high overall waitlist mortality rate was noted (27.1%), which was even higher (43.5%) if the diagnostic age was <3 years. The 1-, 5-, and 10-year transplant-free were 61.1, 48.0, and 42.8%. Age at diagnosis >3 years and severe mitral regurgitation at initial diagnosis were independent risk factors for death or transplantation (hazard ratios = 2.93 and 3.31, respectively; for both, P <0.001). In total, 11 patients (10.6%) experienced ventricular function recovery after a median follow-up of 2.5 (interquartile range = 1.65-5) years. Younger age at diagnosis was associated a higher probability of ventricular function recovery. Conclusions: Despite donor shortage for heart transplantation and subsequently high waitlist mortality, our data from an Asian cohort indicated that transplant-free long-term survival was comparable with that noted in reports from Western populations. Although younger patients had exceptionally higher waitlist mortality, lower diagnostic age was associated with better long-term survival and higher likelihood of ventricular function recovery.