Meet Me Where I Am: An Evaluation of an HIV Patient Navigation Intervention to Increase Uptake of PrEP Among Black Men Who Have Sex with Men in the Deep South

Improving Delivery and Use of HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis in the US: A Systematic Review of Implementation Strategies and Adjunctive Interventions

Implementation of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) to prevent HIV transmission is suboptimal in the United States. To date, the literature has focused on identifying determinants of PrEP use, with a lesser focus on developing and testing change methods to improve PrEP implementation. Moreover, the change methods available for improving the uptake and sustained use of PrEP have not been systematically categorized. To summarize the state of the literature, we conducted a systematic review of the implementation strategies used to improve PrEP implementation among delivery systems and providers, as well as the adjunctive interventions used to improve the uptake and persistent adherence to PrEP among patients. Between November 2020 and January 2021, we searched Ovid MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Web of Science for peer reviewed articles. We identified 44 change methods (18 implementation strategies and 26 adjunctive interventions) across a variety of clinical and community-based service settings. We coded implementation strategies and adjunctive interventions in accordance with established taxonomies and reporting guidelines. Most studies focused on improving patient adherence to PrEP and most conducted pilot trials. Just over one-third of included studies demonstrated a positive effect on outcomes. In order to end the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) epidemic in the U.S., future, large scale HIV prevention research is needed that develops and evaluates implementation strategies and adjunctive interventions for target populations disproportionately affected by HIV.

Establishing Evidence Criteria for Implementation Strategies: A Delphi Study for HIV Services

BACKGROUND

There are no criteria specifically for evaluating the quality of implementation research and recommend implementation strategies likely to have impact to practitioners. We describe the development and application of the Best Practices Rubric, a set of criteria to evaluate the evidence supporting implementation strategies, in the context of HIV.

METHODS

We developed the Best Practices Rubric from 2022-2023 in three phases. (1) We purposively selected and recruited by email participants representing a mix of expertise in HIV service delivery, quality improvement, and implementation science. We developed a draft rubric and criteria based on a literature review and key informant interviews. (2) The rubric was then informed and revised through two e-Delphi rounds using a survey delivered online through Qualtrics. The first and second round Delphi surveys consisted of 71 and 52 open and close-ended questions, respectively, asking participants to evaluate, confirm, and make suggestions on different aspects of the rubric. After each survey round, data were analyzed and synthesized as appropriate, and the rubric and criteria were revised. (3) We then applied the rubric to a set of research studies assessing 18 implementation strategies designed to promote the adoption and uptake of pre-exposure prophylaxis, an HIV prevention medication, to assess reliable application of the rubric and criteria.

RESULTS

Our initial literature review yielded existing rubrics and criteria for evaluating intervention-level evidence. For a strategy-level rubric, additions emerged from interviews, for example, a need to consider the context and specification of strategies. Revisions were made after both Delphi rounds resulting in the confirmation of five evaluation domains - research design, implementation outcomes, limitations and rigor, strategy specification, and equity - and four evidence levels - best practice, promising practice, more evidence needed, and harmful practices. For most domains, criteria were specified at each evidence level. After an initial pilot round to develop an application process and provide training, we achieved 98% reliability when applying the criteria to 18 implementation strategies.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed a rubric to evaluate the evidence supporting implementation strategies for HIV services. Although the rubric is specific to HIV, this tool is adaptable for evaluating strategies in other health areas.

Influences affecting decision-making regarding use of pre-exposure prophylaxis among black men who have sex with men in the USA: a systematic review and meta-synthesis

AIM

To systematically identify, evaluate, and synthesise qualitative research examining positive and negative influences affecting decision-making behaviour among black men who have sex with men (BMSM) in the USA regarding use of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP).

BACKGROUND

Used correctly, PrEP is highly efficacious in preventing HIV infection and is available via healthcare services throughout the USA. BMSM are a key target population for HIV prevention services, however their engagement with these services is low. With potential barriers to access ranging from systemic to personal, a phenomenological perspective on the influences affecting individuals' decision-making is essential, helping to better understand the needs of this target population and guide development and delivery of more effective future policy and intervention services.

DESIGN

Qualitative meta-synthesis with meta-aggregation.

DATA SOURCES

The electronic databases Medline, CINAHL, APA PsycInfo, Embase and Ovid Emcare were comprehensively searched from inception to 21 January 2022.

REVIEW METHODS

Systematic identification, quality assessment and synthesis of existing qualitative research according to protocols of meta-aggregation. This included identifying salient study findings and corroborating illustrations from the data, sorting like findings into descriptive themed categories and developing transformative synthesised statements from aggregate appraisal of category findings.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies met the inclusion criteria and were assessed to be of acceptable quality. Synthesis of study data yielded 30 categories grouped under five themes: Stigma, Discrimination, Mistrust, PrEP positivity and PrEP negativity. Twelve synthesised statements were produced to provide a summary of the results and suggest improvements to the delivery of future PrEP services and interventions.

CONCLUSION

A more targeted approach focused on advocacy and ambassadorship outside of clinical settings may be more influential in positive decision-making regarding use of PrEP in BMSM populations than relying on traditional outreach methods via institutions and their representatives where stigma, mistrust and structural inequalities perpetuate.

Lack of Informed and Affirming Healthcare for Sexual Minority Men: A Call for Patient-Centered Care

BACKGROUND

Sexual minority men (SMM) face severe health inequities alongside negative experiences that drive avoidance of medical care. Understanding how SMM experience healthcare is paramount to improving this population's health. Patient-centered care, which emphasizes mutual respect and collaboration between patients and providers, may alleviate the disparaging effects of the homophobia that SMM face in healthcare settings.

OBJECTIVE

To explore how SMM perceive their experiences with healthcare providers and how care can most effectively meet their needs.

DESIGN

Semi-structured qualitative interviews focused on healthcare experiences, pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), and HIV-related beliefs were conducted between July and November 2018.

PARTICIPANTS

The study included a sample of 43 young adult SMM (ages 25-27), representing diverse socioeconomic, racial, and ethnic backgrounds, in New York City.

APPROACH

Researchers utilized a multiphase, systematic coding method to identify salient themes in the interview transcripts.

KEY RESULTS

Analyses revealed three main themes: (1) SMM perceived that their clinicians often lack adequate skills and knowledge required to provide care that considers participants' identities and behaviors; (2) SMM desired patient-centered care as a way to regain agency and actively participate in making decisions about their health; and (3) SMM felt that patient-centered care was more common with providers who were LGBTQ-affirming, including many who felt that this was especially true for LGBTQ-identified providers.

CONCLUSIONS

SMM expressed a clear and strong desire for patient-centered approaches to care, often informed by experiences with healthcare providers who were unable to adequately meet their needs. However, widespread adoption of patient-centered care will require improving education and training for clinicians, with a focus on LGBTQ-specific clinical care and cultural humility. Through centering patients' preferences and experiences in the construction of care, patient-centered care can reduce health inequities among SMM and empower healthcare utilization in a population burdened by historic and ongoing stigmatization.

A Systematic Review of Implementation Research on Determinants and Strategies of Effective HIV Interventions for Men Who Have Sex with Men in the United States

Men who have sex with men (MSM) are disproportionately affected by HIV, accounting for two-thirds of HIV cases in the United States despite representing ∼5% of the adult population. Delivery and use of existing and highly effective HIV prevention and treatment strategies remain suboptimal among MSM. To summarize the state of the science, we systematically review implementation determinants and strategies of HIV-related health interventions using implementation science frameworks. Research on implementation barriers has focused predominantly on characteristics of individual recipients (e.g., ethnicity, age, drug use) and less so on deliverers (e.g., nurses, physicians), with little focus on system-level factors. Similarly, most strategies target recipients to influence their uptake and adherence, rather than improving and supporting implementation systems. HIV implementation research is burgeoning; future research is needed to broaden the examination of barriers at the provider and system levels, as well as expand knowledge on how to match strategies to barriers-particularly to address stigma. Collaboration and coordination among federal, state, and local public health agencies; community-based organizations; health care providers; and scientists are important for successful implementation of HIV-related health innovations.

Clinic-based interventions to increase preexposure prophylaxis awareness and uptake among United States patients attending an obstetrics and gynecology clinic in Baltimore, Maryland

BACKGROUND

Cisgender women account for 1 of every 5 new US HIV diagnoses, with most cases (85%) attributed to heterosexual contact. HIV preexposure prophylaxis is an effective prevention strategy; however, preexposure prophylaxis awareness and prescriptions among women are low.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to increase preexposure prophylaxis counseling and uptake among cisgender women attending obstetrics and gynecology clinics.

STUDY DESIGN

The study included 3 obstetrics and gynecology clinics within a single health system in a high HIV prevalence region. There were 3 phases: baseline (the 3-month period before the clinical trial that included provider education and training of a registered nurse about preexposure prophylaxis), clinical trial (the 3-month period during which eligible patients were randomized to an active control or preexposure prophylaxis registered nurse intervention), and maintenance (the 3-month period after the trial ended). Electronic medical record clinical decision support tools were available to both arms during the clinical trial, which included best practice alerts, order sets, progress note templates, and written and video preexposure prophylaxis educational materials for patients. In the intervention arm, a preexposure prophylaxis nurse contacted and counseled patients and was equipped to prescribe preexposure prophylaxis. Moreover, this study evaluated the phases through the "reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance" framework. The primary outcome of the study was effectiveness (eg, percentage of eligible patients with documented HIV prevention counseling in the electronic medical record or preexposure prophylaxis prescriptions). The secondary outcomes included reach (eg, percentage of best practice alerts that providers acted on or the percentage of eligible patients who spoke with the preexposure prophylaxis registered nurse), adoption (eg, percentage of eligible patients with a best practice alert that triggered or the percentage of eligible patients the preexposure prophylaxis registered nurse attempted to contact), and maintenance (eg, percentage of patients with documented HIV prevention counseling or preexposure prophylaxis prescriptions during the maintenance phase).

RESULTS

There were 904 unique patients in all phases with a mean age of 28.8±7.7 years, and 416 patients (46%) were pregnant; moreover, 436 patients were randomized in the clinical trial phase. Concerning reach and adoption, best practice alerts were triggered for 100% of eligible encounters; however, the providers acted on 52% of them. The preexposure prophylaxis nurse attempted to contact every patient and successfully spoke with 81.2% of them in the preexposure prophylaxis registered nurse arm. Concerning effectiveness, there were significantly more patients counseled about preexposure prophylaxis in the preexposure prophylaxis registered nurse group than in the active control group (66.5% vs 12.3%, respectively; P<.001), although preexposure prophylaxis prescriptions were equivalent (P=1.0). Among the subgroup of patients who were counseled about preexposure prophylaxis, 18.5% of patients in the active control arm and 3.4% in the preexposure prophylaxis registered nurse arm were prescribed preexposure prophylaxis (P=.02). Concerning maintenance, clinical decision support tools alone resulted in preexposure prophylaxis counseling of 1.0% of patients during the maintenance phase vs 0.6% of patients during the baseline phase and 11.2% of patients during the clinical trial phase (P<.001). Preexposure prophylaxis prescriptions were not statistically different among the 3 phases (P=.096).

CONCLUSION

A preexposure prophylaxis nurse effectively increased HIV prevention discussions but did not lead to more preexposure prophylaxis prescriptions than the preexposure prophylaxis-focused clinical decision support tools used by providers. The decrease in preexposure prophylaxis counseling after the trial phase suggests that persistent interventions are needed to maintain effects.

Characterizing Persons With HIV/HCV Coinfection Who Remain Untreated for Hepatitis C at Four HIV Clinics in Connecticut (CT): Role of Multiple Overlapping Barriers at the Individual and Clinic System Levels

Introduction. Direct-acting antiviral medications have made hepatitis C virus (HCV) cure possible for >95% of persons with chronic HCV infection, including those coinfected with HIV. Achieving strategic HCV elimination targets requires an understanding of system, provider, and patient-level barriers to treatment. We explored such barriers among persons with HIV/HCV coinfection who remained untreated for HCV. Methods. Among four primary care HIV clinics in CT with high rates of HCV cure, 25 patients with HIV/HCV coinfection were eligible (no HCV treatment as of March 31, 2021). We conducted retrospective chart reviews of demographics, clinical practice patterns, patient-specific issues such as housing, transportation, food security, and presence of mental health and substance use problems. Results. Among untreated patients, 13 (51%) were female; 17 (68%) were Black; median age was 62 years old. The majority (84%) had injecting drug use (IDU) as HIV transmission risk factor; 14 (56%) were prescribed medication-assisted treatment. Median time since HIV and HCV diagnosis was 25 and 19 years, respectively. Clinic-level barriers were noted in 19 (76%) and included lack of evaluation, treatment not recommended or implemented. Concomitant structural barriers included unstable housing for 11 (44%) and lack of transportation for eight (32%). Most patients had history of illicit substance use (84%) and mental health issues (68%). Many (76%) had multiple potential barriers. Conclusions. Multiple overlapping barriers spanning clinic and patient level domains including social determinants of health were the norm in persons with long-standing HIV/HCV coinfection who have not received HCV treatment. Interventions will require innovative, multi-disciplinary and personalized approaches.

POWER Up-Improving pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) uptake among Black cisgender women in the Southern United States: Protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial (SW-CRT)

BACKGROUND

HIV disproportionately affects Black/African American cisgender women (hereafter women) in the United States. Despite its proven effectiveness, pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV prevention remains vastly under-prescribed to women based on their need. Increasing PrEP uptake and persistence among women is crucial to reducing HIV transmission; however, there have been few studies designed specifically for women. This article describes the study protocol used to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of implementation strategies to improve PrEP uptake and persistence among Black women in the Midwest and South.

METHODS

PrEP Optimization among Women to Enhance Retention and Uptake (POWER Up) is an evidence-based, woman-focused set of five implementation science strategies that addresses barriers of PrEP utilization at the provider, patient, and clinic levels. POWER Up includes 1) routine PrEP education for patients, 2) standardized provider training, 3) electronic medical record (EMR) optimization, 4) PrEP navigation, and 5) PrEP clinical champions. These strategies will be adapted to specific clinics for implementation, tested via a stepped-wedge trial, and, if effective, packaged for further dissemination.

DISCUSSION

We will utilize a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial (SW-CRT) to measure change in PrEP utilization across diverse geographic areas. Preparation for adapting and implementing the bundle of strategies is needed to determine how to tailor them to specific clinics. Implementation challenges will include adapting strategies with the available resources at each site, maintaining stakeholder involvement and staff buy-in, adjusting the study protocol and planned procedures as needed, and ensuring minimal crossover. Additionally, strengths and limitations of each strategy must be examined before, during, and after the adaptation and implementation processes. Finally, the implementation outcomes of the strategies must be evaluated to determine the real-world success of the strategies. This study is an important step toward addressing the inequity in PrEP service delivery and increasing PrEP utilization among Black women in the U.S.

English Teaching Achievement Prediction by Big Data Analysis under Deep Intervention

Appropriate data analysis technology can make people use the online degree education, obtain the data and information generated in the learning management system, and provide a useful decision basis for optimizing the teaching and management process of online degree education. Data analysis technology can help English teachers better grasp students’ learning situations and progress and optimize management. First, data analysis methods and decision tree algorithms are analyzed. Second, in data mining technology, the C4.5 decision tree method is used to construct an English score prediction model. Through the analysis of English learning-related information such as questionnaires and collected student test score data, the prediction of English teaching performance is analyzed from the perspective of teachers’ in-depth intervention. The survey results are shown as follows: (1) The model is simulated and tested. The model’s prediction accuracy is 98.20%, 99.10%, 99.40%, 98.70%, and 98.90%, higher than the standard accuracy of 97.5%. Additionally, the average response efficiency of the model is 99.42%, which can be used. (2) The failure rate of boys’ final grades is 11%, and the failure rate of female students’ final grades is 10%. There is only a 1% difference in the final grade failure rate between male and female students. The effect of gender on teaching performance is less pronounced. (3) As the number of practice questions increases, the rate of failing grades decreases. Thus, the data suggest that the number of practice questions affects instructional performance. (4) Teachers’ intervention can improve students’ English achievement. Increasing the intensity of the intervention also improves student achievement. Therefore, the follow-up research should increase the number of practice questions and teacher intervention in English teaching. The English teaching achievement prediction suggestion based on big data analysis is put forward, providing a reference for prediction management.

'PrEP'ing Memphis: A qualitative process evaluation of peer navigation support

BACKGROUND

HIV PrEP (pre-exposure prophylaxis) navigation comprises intervention strategies used to improve PrEP uptake via education, linkage, and follow-up/ongoing engagement. During 2016-2019, the Tennessee Department of Health (TDH) implemented a CDC-funded demonstration project ("Project PrIDE") focused on PrEP navigation in Memphis community-based organizations (CBOs) and the Shelby County Health Department (HD). A process evaluation was conducted to determine facilitators and barriers to the implementation of the Memphis-based Project PrIDE PrEP navigation activities.

METHODS

A total of fourteen in-depth qualitative interviews were conducted, with nine PrEP navigators in evaluation year 1 (2018) and five of the original navigators in evaluation year 2 (2019), to understand the navigation processes using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Facilitators of PrEP navigation included accessing clients at testing events, accompanying clients to first appointments, rapport building with patient and clinic staff, and maintaining consistent engagement with clients. Factors impeding PrEP navigation included difficulties assessing client readiness, tracking client navigation status, and stigmatizing clinic and social experiences for clients.

CONCLUSIONS AND LESSONS LEARNED

Findings have informed the scale-up of PrEP navigation implementation statewide, along with priority setting and resource allocation for the local Ending the HIV Epidemic (EHE) initiative in Memphis.