Mapping Implementation Science with Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (MIS-ERIC): Strategies to Improve PrEP Use among Black Cisgender Women Living in Mississippi

From blueprint to biobank: Leveraging expert recommendations for implementing change (ERIC) to pediatric cancer biobanking in Pakistan

BACKGROUND

In low- and middle-income countries, limited infrastructure and resources hinder biobank establishment, affecting specimen diversity. Addressing this gap is crucial for equitable health outcomes, as current databases are skewed towards Northern-European populations. In Pakistan, pediatric cancer biobanks are non-existent. Indus Hospital & Health Network (IHHN) in Karachi, with its large pediatric cancer unit, aims to establish a biobank to address region-specific pediatric cancer research needs. This manuscript describes the biobank implementation process using implementation science frameworks.

METHODS

The pediatric cancer biobank at IHHN collects FFPE specimens for solid tumors, and isolated mononuclear cells from peripheral blood and bone marrow of suspected acute leukemia. Implementation planning workgroups included clinicians, EMR, IT, management, senior leadership, IRB, and external support from UNC and St. Jude Children's Cancer Hospital. The selection of applicable ERIC (Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change) strategies through stakeholder workgroups considered scope, budget, and feasibility, and context. Standard protocols from ISBER and BCNet guided alignment with best practices. IHHN's past experiences and tacit knowledge gained through rapid, successful implementation also facilitated strategy selection. The EPIS framework (exploration, preparation, implementation, sustainment) was used to map and organize the selected intervention strategies.

RESULTS

Biobank implementation at IHHN, organized by EPIS stages, has been described through a set of 41 implementation strategies. Of these, 34 were selected out of 73 originally published ERIC strategies, while 7 were added based on contextually based workgroup consensus. 599 acute leukemia and 1137 solid tumor specimens have been banked since inception of the biobank operations 2 years earlier. The implementation activities and challenges described include infrastructure, swift specimen collection, prior to treatment, and informed consent. The ancillary processes including training and quality control have also been described and related data presented.

CONCLUSION

The implementation of Pakistan's first acute leukemia biobank using ERIC and EPIS frameworks offers a structured approach beneficial for settings with limited biobanking experience. This intervention aligns with recognized implementation science frameworks, while addressing aspects pertinent in low- and middle-income countries.

Understanding PrEP Contemplation Among Black Women: Insights from a Qualitative Analysis

BACKGROUND

The lack of engagement and use of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among Black women in the Southern United States is an enduring health disparity. Guided by an integrated theoretical framework and the PrEP Cascade, this qualitative inquiry aimed to explore Black women's motivation and decision-making regarding PrEP engagement and identify strategies to enhance PrEP messaging and uptake for those with indication(s) for PrEP use.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twelve semi-structured Zoom interviews were conducted between February 2020 and March 2022. Participants were sampled from a larger pool in an online survey study about factors associated with PrEP uptake among Black women. Interviews explored whether women started PrEP (or not) within 3 months after learning about PrEP in the survey and explored their reasoning. Data analysis included quantitative descriptive statistics and directed content analysis.

RESULTS

None of the 12 women had started PrEP at the time of the interview. Two were in discussions with their provider about PrEP (stage 3: PrEParation), and one intended to initiate PrEP within the next 3 months (i.e., thinking about it). Two main themes emerged as their reasons for not starting PrEP: current relationship status and PrEP information (awareness, knowledge, and literacy). Participants expressed a lack of trust in PrEP due to insufficient information while anticipated challenges in obtaining PrEP included cost and the patient-provider relationship (engagement and communication).

CONCLUSION

The findings highlight missed opportunities to improve PrEP use among Black women within the PrEP contemplation phase, emphasizing the need for improved PrEP messaging and tailored PrEP programs and/or interventions for this group.

A Qualitative Study Exploring How the Perspectives and Experiences of Cisgender Black Women Inform Their Readiness to Consider Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis for HIV Prevention

Attention to increasing pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use among cisgender Black women (CBW) in the southern United States (U.S.) is necessary to achieve national 2030 Ending the HIV Epidemic (EHE) goals. Qualitative exploration of CBW's readiness to use PrEP is necessary to discern whether practical solutions to addressing PrEP uptake within this HIV-vulnerable population are feasible. Focus group discussions (n = 5) and key informant interviews (n = 3) in two EHE jurisdictions in Houston and Austin, Texas were used to explore how perspectives and lived experiences may serve as facilitators and/or barriers to PrEP readiness among 20 CBW. Codes highlighted facilitators and barriers to PrEP readiness. Facilitators involved positive experiences with the healthcare system, high perceived HIV vulnerability, and prioritizing PrEP as self-care. Barriers encompassed concerns with sexual relationship dynamics, mental health implications, and access to humane treatment within the healthcare system. High perceived vulnerability of HIV acquisition is related to an awareness that CBW may not know the entirety of their partner's sexual activities. Findings indicate precursors of PrEP readiness and challenge the notion that CBW have low perceived vulnerability of acquiring HIV.

Leveraging Community Engagement and Human-Centered Design to Develop Multilevel Implementation Strategies to Enhance Adoption of a Health Equity Intervention

Background Health equity intervention implementation (which promotes positive health outcomes for populations experiencing disproportionately worse health) is often impeded by health-equity-specific barriers like provider bias; few studies demonstrate how to overcome these barriers through implementation strategies. An urgent health equity problem in the U.S. is the mental health of transgender youth. To address this, we developed Gender-Affirming Psychotherapy (GAP), a health equity intervention comprising best-practice mental health care for transgender youth. This paper details the identification of implementation determinants and the development of targeted strategies to promote provider adoption of GAP. Methods This study represents part of a larger study of mental health provider adoption of GAP. Here we describe the first 2 stages of the 3-stage community-engaged and human-centered design process - Discover, Design/Build, and Test - to identify implementation determinants of adoption and develop implementation strategies with transgender youth, their parents, and mental health providers. This process involved collecting data via focus groups, design meetings, usability testing, and champion meetings. Data were analyzed using rapid and conventional content analysis. Qualitative coding of implementation determinants was guided by the Health Equity Implementation Framework, and implementation strategy coding was facilitated by the ERIC Implementation Strategy Compilation. Results We identified 15 determinants of GAP adoption, and all were specific to the transgender population (e.g., inclusive record system, anti-transgender attitudes). Seventeen implementation strategies were recommended and 12 were developed, collectively addressing all identified determinants. Most strategies were packaged into an online self-paced mental health provider training (implementation intervention) with 6 training tools. Additional inner setting strategies were designed to support training uptake (e.g., mandate training) and GAP adoption (e.g., change record system). Conclusions Community-engaged and human-centered design methods can identify health equity intervention implementation determinants and develop targeted strategies. We highlight five generalizable takeaways for health equity implementation scientists: (1) implementer bias may be a key barrier, (2) experience with the health equity population may be an important facilitator, (3) stakeholder stories may be an effective training tool, (4) inner setting-level implementation strategies may be necessary, and (5) teaching implementers how to build implementation strategies can overcome resource-constraints. Trial registration: NCT05626231.

Where do we go from here? Reconciling implementation failure of PrEP for Black women in the South. Leveraging critical realism to identify unaddressed barriers as we move forward

Introduction

PrEP, a highly effective HIV prevention measure, provides autonomy to individuals in managing their HIV acquisition vulnerability. Despite its availability in tenofovir-based oral pills and injectable cabotegravir formulations, PrEP uptake among Black cisgender women in the U.S. South, a region with a high HIV burden, remains critically low. This demographic faces a disproportionately high rate of new HIV diagnoses, yet fewer than 10% of women in the US who could benefit from PrEP are currently receiving it.

Methods

Utilizing a critical realism interpretative framework, this narrative review employed a tri-level analysis strategy to examine the empirical, actual, and real domains influencing PrEP implementation among Black women in the Southern U.S. The empirical level refers to observable events and data (e.g., PrEP uptake rates), the actual level encompasses experiences and actions that may not always be directly observed (e.g., healthcare interactions and community engagement), and the real level involves the deeper structures and mechanisms (e.g., systemic racism and cultural narratives) that shape these outcomes. A comprehensive search of peer-reviewed literature from PubMed and other sources was conducted to identify barriers and facilitators to PrEP uptake in this population.

Results

The analysis revealed significant barriers, including structural violence, socioeconomic disparities, medical mistrust, stigma, and inadequate healthcare policies. Empirical data showed variability in PrEP awareness and interest among Black women, while actual experiences highlighted misaligned marketing strategies, financial constraints, and interpersonal dynamics. At the real level, underlying mechanisms such as systemic racism and cultural narratives were identified as critical impediments to PrEP uptake.

Discussion

Addressing these multifaceted barriers requires a comprehensive, multi-level approach that integrates personalized, community-centric strategies. Emphasizing the need for healthcare providers, community leaders, researchers, and policymakers to collaborate, the review proposes actionable strategies to enhance PrEP implementation, focusing on education, structural reforms, and policy changes to improve access and acceptability among Black women in the South.

Mapping Implementation Strategies to Address Barriers to Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Use Among Women Through POWER Up (Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Optimization Among Women to Enhance Retention and Uptake): Content Analysis

BACKGROUND

Black cisgender women (hereafter referred to as "women") experience one of the highest incidences of HIV among all populations in the United States. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is an effective biomedical HIV prevention option, but uptake among women is low. Despite tailored strategies for certain populations, including men who have sex with men and transgender women, Black women are frequently overlooked in HIV prevention efforts. Strategies to increase PrEP awareness and use among Black women are needed at multiple levels (ie, community, system or clinic, provider, and individual or patient).

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to identify barriers and facilitators to PrEP uptake and persistence among Black cisgender women and to map implementation strategies to identified barriers using the CFIR (Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research)-ERIC (Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change) Implementation Strategy Matching Tool.

METHODS

We conducted a secondary analysis of previous qualitative studies completed by a multidisciplinary team of HIV physicians, implementation scientists, and epidemiologists. Studies involved focus groups and interviews with medical providers and women at a federally qualified health center in Chicago, Illinois. Implementation science frameworks such as the CFIR were used to investigate determinants of PrEP use among Black women. In this secondary analysis, data from 45 total transcripts were analyzed. We identified barriers and facilitators to PrEP uptake and persistence among cisgender women across each CFIR domain. The CFIR-ERIC Implementation Strategy Matching Tool was used to map appropriate implementation strategies to address barriers and increase PrEP uptake among Black women.

RESULTS

Barriers to PrEP uptake were identified across the CFIR domains. Barriers included being unaware that PrEP was available (characteristics of individuals), worrying about side effects and impacts on fertility and pregnancy (intervention characteristics), and being unsure about how to pay for PrEP (outer setting). Providers identified lack of training (characteristics of individuals), need for additional clinical support for PrEP protocols (inner setting), and need for practicing discussions about PrEP with women (intervention characteristics). ERIC mapping resulted in 5 distinct implementation strategies to address barriers and improve PrEP uptake: patient education, provider training, PrEP navigation, clinical champions, and electronic medical record optimization.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence-based implementation strategies that address individual, provider, and clinic factors are needed to engage women in the PrEP care continuum. Tailoring implementation strategies to address identified barriers increases the probability of successfully improving PrEP uptake. Our results provide an overview of a comprehensive, multilevel implementation strategy (ie, "POWER Up") to improve PrEP uptake among women.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

RR2-10.1371/journal.pone.0285858.

"Why Not Just go on PrEP?": A Study to Inform Implementation of an HIV Prevention Intervention Among Hispanic/Latino Men Who Have Sex With Men in the Northeastern United States

BACKGROUND

Preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is an effective biological option for HIV prevention yet persistent disparities in PrEP uptake and retention exist among Hispanic/Latino men who have sex with men (MSM). We evaluated barriers and facilitators to PrEP care among Hispanic/Latino MSM at risk for and living with HIV.

SETTING

A small urban setting in the Northeastern United States.

METHODS

This was a mixed-methods, exploratory, sequential, qualitative and quantitative pilot study among Latino MSM at-risk and/or living with HIV across (1) semistructured qualitative interviews (N = 15) and (2) cross-sectional survey (N = 98).

RESULTS

Participants reported a diverse range of sexual identities, HIV statuses, and PrEP statuses. Qualitative participants described feelings of isolation in both Hispanic/Latino and queer communities that made it challenging to learn about HIV prevention or PrEP from peers. Participants in the survey indicated that they would be more inclined to uptake PrEP if PrEP were offered in primary care settings (n = 61; 62.2%); there were specific LGBTQ+ affirming medical settings (n = 36; 36.7%); and/or they could meet other people who are currently on PrEP and sharing experiences online (n = 46; 46.9%) or in person (n = 38; 38.8%). Findings were organized to reflect determinants and implementation strategies that could be used to improve PrEP uptake among this population.

CONCLUSIONS

This mixed-methods study identified several challenges and opportunities for increasing the reach of PrEP to Hispanic/Latino MSM. These findings should be used to inform tailored implementation strategies to promote PrEP uptake among this at-risk yet currently underserved population.

A qualitative study identifying implementation strategies using the i-PARIHS framework to increase access to pre-exposure prophylaxis at federally qualified health centers in Mississippi

BACKGROUND

Mississippi (MS) experiences disproportionally high rates of new HIV infections and limited availability of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) are poised to increase access to PrEP. However, little is known about the implementation strategies needed to successfully integrate PrEP services into FQHCs in MS.

PURPOSE

The study had two objectives: identify barriers and facilitators to PrEP use and to develop tailored implementation strategies for FQHCs.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 19 staff and 17 PrEP-eligible patients in MS FQHCs between April 2021 and March 2022. The interview was guided by the integrated-Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (i-PARIHS) framework which covered PrEP facilitators and barriers. Interviews were coded according to the i-PARIHS domains of context, innovation, and recipients, followed by thematic analysis of these codes. Identified implementation strategies were presented to 9 FQHC staff for feedback.

RESULTS

Data suggested that PrEP use at FQHCs is influenced by patient and clinic staff knowledge with higher levels of knowledge reflecting more PrEP use. Perceived side effects are the most significant barrier to PrEP use for patients, but participants also identified several other barriers including low HIV risk perception and untrained providers. Despite these barriers, patients also expressed a strong motivation to protect themselves, their partners, and their communities from HIV. Implementation strategies included education and provider training which were perceived as acceptable and appropriate.

CONCLUSIONS

Though patients are motivated to increase protection against HIV, multiple barriers threaten uptake of PrEP within FQHCs in MS. Educating patients and providers, as well as training providers, are promising implementation strategies to overcome these barriers.

Community Health Care Providers' Perspectives on Human Immunodeficiency Virus Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Use Among Black Women in Eastern Virginia

The most at-risk population among women for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) diagnosis in the United States are Black women, accounting for 61% of all new HIV cases. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a safe and effective HIV prevention method for people at risk of HIV acquisition. Although disproportionately affected by HIV, Black women's knowledge, perceived benefits, and uptake of PrEP remain low. The socioecological model (SEM) may be useful for understanding why there is a low uptake of PrEP among Black women. The current study used the SEM to explore provider perspectives on the barriers and facilitators of PrEP uptake among Black women in Eastern Virginia. Semistructured interviews were conducted with a total sample of 15 community health care providers. Barriers of PrEP uptake at the societal (e.g., PrEP advertisements focus on gay men), community/organizational (e.g., time constraints in the workplace), interpersonal (e.g., perceived monogamy), and individual (e.g., unmet basic needs) levels were identified. Providers also identified facilitators of PrEP uptake at the societal (e.g., PrEP advertisements that target women), community/organizational (e.g., PrEP education), interpersonal (e.g., HIV-positive partner), and individual (e.g., PrEP awareness and perceived susceptibility to HIV) levels. These findings highlight unique barriers to accessing and taking PrEP for Black women in the United States, and potential factors that could facilitate PrEP use. Both barriers and facilitators may be important targets for interventions to improve PrEP uptake. Future research focused on improving PrEP uptake among Black women in the United States should consider multi-level interventions that target barriers and facilitators to reduce rates of HIV infections.

A Qualitative Exploration of PrEP Interests, Barriers, and Interventions Among Black and Latina Cisgender Women in the U.S

Black and Latina cisgender women (BLCW) are disproportionally affected by HIV, particularly in the southern U.S. In Austin, Texas, Black women contract HIV 18.4 times more and Latinas 2.6 times more compared to White women. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a medication that prevents contracting HIV; however, PrEP adoption among women is low. The current qualitative study aimed to explore PrEP awareness, interest, preferred PrEP administration methods, barriers to PrEP adoption, and future programs to increase PrEP adoption and adherence among BLCW. A total of 18 BLCW at high risk for HIV were enrolled. Participants completed 3 semi-structured interviews across 3 months. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, coded, and analyzed using thematic content analysis. Results demonstrated that BLCW had low PrEP awareness, high initial PrEP interest, and were interested in a long-acting injectable form of PrEP. Barriers to PrEP adoption included concerns regarding side effects, concerns about adherence to the currently available daily pill, and difficulty with insurance. Participants proposed different ideas for interventions, including support groups, education, community-level programs, and structural interventions. Future studies should focus on increasing PrEP awareness and HIV risk, consider alternative forms of PrEP, educate providers and medical staff on PrEP, and consider tailored interventions to reduce HIV risk among BLCW.

PrEP initiation and adherence among Black cisgender women in Mississippi: The role of HIV and PrEP stigma and social support

BACKGROUND

Stigma and lack of social support are barriers to HIV prevention, especially among cisgender Black women in the United States. While HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) can decrease HIV transmission, PrEP initiation and adherence remains low among Black women, especially in the U.S. South.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to characterize experiences with stigma and social support among PrEP-naïve and PrEP-experienced Black cisgender women in Mississippi.

DESIGN

Qualitative study in which semi-structured interviews and focus groups were conducted.

METHODS

We purposively recruited PrEP-naïve cisgender Black women who met PrEP indications to participate in focus groups and all PrEP-experienced cisgender Black women at a sexual health clinic in Jackson, Mississippi to participate in one-on-one semi-structured interviews. Inductive thematic analysis was used to analyze focus group and interview transcripts.

RESULTS

A total of 37 PrEP-naïve Black cisgender women participated across 6 focus groups and 8 PrEP-experienced cisgender Black women completed semi-structured interviews. Four themes were identified: (1) the intersection of gendered racism, discrimination, and HIV stigma, (2) enacted and anticipated PrEP stigma, (3) stigma mitigation strategies and PrEP adherence, and (4) social support's role in PrEP initiation and adherence. PrEP-naïve and -experienced Black women discussed the negative consequence that sexual stigmatization and gendered racism has on HIV testing. PrEP-naïve Black women discussed how HIV stigma decreases PrEP initiation. Conversely, PrEP-experienced Black women were able to identify strategies they utilized to mitigate stigma. PrEP-experienced Black women discussed how differing levels of social support impact their PrEP use.

CONCLUSION

Improving social support and stigma mitigation strategies could help improve PrEP initiation and adherence among cisgender Black women at-risk of acquiring HIV in the U.S. South. Educating communities on PrEP, and training providers on stigma-mitigating strategies when serving Black women in the U.S. South who are seeking HIV prevention is paramount.

The Impact of Providers as Health Discussants on Black Women's Interest in PrEP for HIV Prevention

This study sought to examine the role of providers as health discussants (HD) on interest in preexposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention in a national sample of adult Black cisgender women (N = 315). Health discussant networks, a type of social network, may be influential in HIV prevention efforts. These networks, often composed of individuals' families, have improved health utilization outcomes in other disciplines. However, health discussants in HIV prevention are understudied, especially when considering providers as network members. We conducted a cross-sectional online survey and collected socio-demographic information, sexual history, HIV concerns, PrEP attitudes, healthcare utilization, mistrust, social support, and HD information. We used descriptive statistics and logistic regression to analyze data. Associations between PrEP interest and variables were examined. We found that older, partnered, who had recent healthcare visits or health insurance were more likely to involve healthcare providers as discussants. Anticipated PrEP stigma decreased provider involvement. Among participants listing providers as discussants, there was a greater likelihood of interest in using PrEP. Our findings indicate that healthcare provider support and social factors are crucial in promoting PrEP engagement among Black women. Integrating social dynamics and positive provider-patient interactions is essential for successful PrEP implementation.

Using audience segmentation to identify implementation strategies to improve PrEP uptake among at-risk cisgender women: a mixed-methods study protocol

BACKGROUND

In the USA, 19% of new HIV infections occur among cisgender women (cis women); however, only 10% of eligible cis women have been prescribed pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for the prevention of HIV infection (an evidence-based intervention). A fundamental challenge for expanding HIV prevention to cis women is ensuring implementation strategies are tailored to the various healthcare settings in which cis women seek care and the heterogeneous providers nested within these settings. This project's specific aims are to (1) explore clinician-level characteristics and organizational climate factors that are related to variability in adoption of PrEP service delivery as an evidence-based intervention for cis women; (2) identify latent audience segments of women's health providers as the related to PrEP acceptability, adoption, and maintenance and analyze demographic correlates of these segments; and (3) identify audience segment-specific implementation strategies to facilitate the adoption of PrEP as an evidence-based intervention among at-risk cis women.

METHODS

Using the i-PARIHS framework, this mixed-methods study examines three domains for guiding audience segmentation to facilitate PrEP implementation for cis women: innovation (degree of fit with existing practices, usability), recipient beliefs and knowledge and context factors (organizational culture, readiness for change), needs to determine appropriate facilitation methods. To achieve aim 1, qualitative interviews will be conducted with PrEP-eligible cis women, women's health providers, and other key stakeholders. Aim 2 will consist of a quantitative survey among 340 women's health providers. Latent class analysis will be used to facilitate audience segmentation. To achieve aim 3, a panel of 5-8 providers for each audience segment will meet and engage in iterative discussions guided by Fernandez's implementation mapping to identify (1) implementation outcomes and performance objectives, determinants, and change objectives and (2) determine and refine of implementation strategies for each audience segment.

DISCUSSION

This exploratory mixed methods study will provide an empirical foundation to inform the development implementations strategies aimed at increasing PrEP delivery to cis women among heterogenous groups of providers.