Are there country-specific differences in the use of pegvisomant for acromegaly in clinical practice? An analysis from ACROSTUDY

Cost-effectiveness analysis of second-line medical therapies in acromegaly: a real-life study

Introduction

Acromegaly is an uncommon disease with important comorbidity and economic cost. Although the pharmacological cost of second-line treatment for refractory acromegaly has been theoretically analyzed, real-life studies are needed.

Objectives

To assess the use of pasireotide and pegvisomant in a third-level center under routine clinical practice.

Methods

Acromegaly patients that had been treated with pasireotide and/or pegvisomant were included in (A) a cross-sectional study (two years after starting these drugs) to analyze the cost of acromegaly, hormone replacement, and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) treatments, and the cost of surgery and radiotherapy; and (B) a retrospective cohorts study (May 2006-October 2024) to analyze efficacy, safety (adverse events, fasting glucose, glycated hemoglobin, and T2DM diagnosis), and dose evolution. Descriptive statistics were 10% trimmed means and standard deviation. Two-tailed hypothesis testing with Yuen's t and Fisher's test had a P < 0.05 significance.

Results

25 participants were included in the transversal study and 31 participants in the longitudinal study. A typical patient with a poorly granulated GH-producing adenoma underwent in-center surgery once and received radiotherapy. In the transversal study, total pharmacological cost was 34,139.29 (13,472.09) €/person/year, with 33,874.88 (13,468.36) €/person/year for second-line acromegaly drugs. Pasireotide displayed 9,423.26 €/person/year worth of savings (P = .12), reaching 30,415.98 €/person/year at high dose (P < 0.001). In the longitudinal study, pasireotide dose was reduced (P = .06) regardless of treatment modality. Pasireotide affected carbohydrate metabolism (P = .001), but the effect was generally mild.

Conclusions

Pasireotide was found to be a more cost-effective option in patients with first-line treatment failure.

Insights from an Italian Delphi panel: exploring resistance to first-generation somatostatin receptor ligands and guiding second-line medical therapies in acromegaly management

PURPOSE

First-line medical therapy for acromegaly management includes first-generation somatostatin receptor ligands (fgSRLs), but resistance limits their use. Despite international guidelines, the choice of second-line therapy is debated.

METHODS

We aim to discuss resistance to fgSRLs, identify second-line therapy determinants and assess glycemia's impact to provide valuable insights for acromegaly management in clinical practice. A group of Italian endocrinologists expert in the pituitary field participated in a two-round Delphi panel between July and September 2023. The Delphi questionnaire encompassed a total of 75 statements categorized into three sections: resistance to fgSRLs therapy and predictors of response; determinants for the selection of second-line therapy; the role of glycemia in the therapeutic management. The statements were rated on a 6-point Likert scale.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine (79%) statements reached a consensus. IGF-1 levels resulted central for evaluating resistance to fgSRLs, that should be defined considering also symptomatic clinical response, degree of tumor shrinkage and complications, using clinician- and patient-reported outcome tools available. Factors to be evaluated for the choice of second-line medical therapy are hyperglycemia-that should be managed as in non-acromegalic patients-tumor remnant, resistant headache and compliance. Costs do not represent a main determinant in the choice of second-line medical treatment.

CONCLUSION

The experts agreed on a holistic management approach to acromegaly. It is therefore necessary to choose currently available highly effective second-line medical treatment (pegvisomant and pasireotide) based on the characteristics of the patients.

The direct impact of pegvisomant on osteoblast functions and bone development

PURPOSE

Acromegaly is a chronic disease characterized by growth hormone (GH) hypersecretion, usually caused by a pituitary adenoma, resulting in elevated circulating levels of insulin-like growth factor type I (IGF-I). Pegvisomant (PEG), the GH-receptor (GHR) antagonist, is used in treating acromegaly to normalize IGF-I hypersecretion. Exposure to increased levels of GH and IGF-I can cause profound alterations in bone structure that are not completely reverted by treatment of GH hypersecretion. Indeed, there is evidence that drugs used for the treatment of acromegaly might induce direct effects on skeletal health regardless of biochemical control of acromegaly.

METHODS

We investigated, for the first time, the effect of PEG on cell proliferation, differentiation, and mineralization in the osteoblast cell lines MC3T3-E1 and hFOB 1.19 and its potential impact on bone development in zebrafish larvae.

RESULTS

We observed that PEG did not affect osteoblast proliferation, apoptosis, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity, and mineralization. After PEG treatment, the analysis of genes related to osteoblast differentiation showed no difference in Alp, Runx2, or Opg mRNA levels in MC3T3-E1 cells. GH significantly decreased cell apoptosis (- 30 ± 11%, p < 0.001) and increased STAT3 phosphorylation; these effects were suppressed by the addition of PEG in MC3T3-E1 cells. GH and PEG did not affect Igf-I, Igfbp2, and Igfbp4 mRNA levels in MC3T3-E1 cells. Finally, PEG did not affect bone development in zebrafish larvae at 5 days post-fertilization.

CONCLUSION

This study provides a first evidence of the impact of PEG on osteoblast functions both in vitro and in vivo. These findings may have clinically relevant implications for the management of skeletal health in subjects with acromegaly.