Impact of baseline body mass index on the outcomes of patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms

Nutritional status and gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: lights and shadows with a clinical guide from the NIKE Group

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) originating in the gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) tract are rare tumors often associated with significant metabolic disturbances and nutritional challenges. This review explores the intricate relationship between nutritional status and the development, progression, and prognosis of GEP-NENs. Through an extensive literature search encompassing studies up to April 2024, we examined various factors, including obesity, malnutrition, metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes mellitus, and their roles in the development and progression of GEP-NENs. The review highlights the dual role of obesity, both as a risk factor and a potential prognostic indicator, drawing attention to the 'obesity paradox' observed in cancer research. Additionally, we discuss the impact of malnutrition on patient outcomes and emphasize the need for comprehensive nutritional assessments beyond BMI. This analysis highlights the importance of incorporating nutritional interventions into preventive and therapeutic strategies for GEP-NEN patients. Future research should further clarify these associations and develop personalized nutritional management protocols to improve patient prognosis and quality of life. Acronyms adopted in the text and tables: AOR: adjusted odd ratio, BIA: Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis, BMI: Body Mass Index, CI: confidence interval, CLARINET: Controlled Study of Lanreotide Antiproliferative Response in Neuroendocrine Tumor, FLI: fatty liver index, GEP: gastroenteropancreatic, GLIM: global leadership into malnutrition, HR: hazard ratio, MS: metabolic syndrome, MUST: malabsorption universal screening tool, NEC: neuroendocrine carcinoma, NENs: Neuroendocrine neoplasms, NETs: Neuroendocrine tumors, NRS: Nutritional Risk Screening, OR: odd ratio, OS: overall survival, PFS: progression-free survival, RR: risk ratio, SGA: Subjective Global Assessment, T2DM: type 2 diabetes mellitus, VAI: visceral adiposity index, WD: well-differentiated.

Impact of sex differences on patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms during hospital admission

Background

Sex disparities are known modifiers of health and disease. In neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs), sex-based differences have been observed in the epidemiology and treatment-related side effects.

Objectives

To examine sex differences in demographics, diagnoses present during hospital admission, comorbidities, and outcomes of hospital course among hospitalized patients with NENs.

Design

Retrospective analysis.

Methods

A descriptive analysis of sex differences was performed on patients with NENs discharged from U.S. community hospitals in 2019 from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS), Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, and Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

Results

A total of 7334 patients with NENs were identified; 4284 patients had primary NENs, and 3050 patients had metastatic NENs. In total, 48.7% were males and 51.3% were females. Distributions of race and ethnicity, and payer types differed by sex (p < 0.001 and p = 0.027, respectively). For race and ethnicity, there were more females in White, Black, and Native American races, and Hispanic ethnicity. For payer types, female predominance was seen with Medicare, Medicaid, private insurance, and self-pay groups. Sex differences were seen in diagnosis made during hospital stay. In all NENs, oral (p = 0.036) and neurologic (p < 0.001) diagnoses were more common in females; ascites (p = 0.002), dysphagia (p = 0.002), biliary ductal obstruction (p = 0.014), and jaundice (p = 0.048) were more common in males. In primary NENs, ascites (p < 0.001) was male predominant. In metastatic NENs, dysphagia (p = 0.003) and jaundice (p = 0.034) were male predominant, whereas females had more headaches (p < 0.001). Nausea and vomiting were female predominant in all NENs (p < 0.001), primary (p = 0.044), and metastatic (p < 0.001) NENs. For comorbidities, arthropathies (p < 0.001), depression (p < 0.001), hypothyroidism (p < 0.001), other thyroid disorders (p < 0.001), chronic pulmonary disease (p = 0.002), and obesity (p < 0.001) were female predominant.

Conclusion

There were sex differences in the race and ethnicity, payer types, diagnoses present during hospital admission, and comorbidities among the 2019 NIS hospital discharge sample of patients with NENs.

Sex Differences in the Survival of Patients with Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Comparative Study of Two National Databases

BACKGROUND

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are increasing in incidence globally. Previous analysis of the UK cancer database (National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service (NCRAS)) showed a notable female survival advantage in most tumour sites. This study aims to compare NCRAS to the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) to validate these results using the same statistical methods.

METHODS

A total of 14,834 and 108,399 patients with NENs were extracted from NCRAS and SEER, respectively. Sixty-months survival for both males and females for each anatomical site of NENs were calculated using restricted mean survival time (RMST) and Kaplan-Meier Survival estimates. The sixty-month RMST female survival advantage (FSA) was calculated.

RESULTS

FSA was similar in NCRAS and SEER. The highest FSA occurred in lung and stomach NENs.

CONCLUSIONS

The data from SEER confirm the findings published by NCRAS. Female survival advantage remains unexplained.

The effect of hyperlipidemia on overall survival in patients with cancer was differentiated by BMI and hyperlipidemia type

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The impact of lipids on the overall survival (OS) of patients with malignancy has not yet been clarified. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of hyperlipidemia on the OS among Chinese patients based on Body Mass Index (BMI) stratifications and hyperlipidemia types.

METHOD

The patients in this study were derived from the Investigation of the Nutrition Status and Clinical Outcome of Common Cancers (INSCOC) trial. Kaplan-Meier was used to draw the survival curve, and the log-rank test was used to estimate the survival rates between each group. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate the hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

A total of 9054 patients were included in the final study, with a median age of 59 years, and 55.3% (5004) of them were males. Regarding types of hyperlipidemia, only low high-density lipoprotein was an independent risk factor for the prognosis of all patients (HR = 1.35, 95% CI: 1.25-1.45, P < 0.001), while high total cholesterol (HR = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.90-1.15, P = 0.839) and high low-density lipoprotein (HR = 1.03, 95%CI: 0.91-1.16, P = 0.680) were not. In terms of BMI stratification, the effect of triglycerides on prognosis varied; high triglycerides were an independent risk factor for the prognosis of underweight patients (HR = 1.56, 95% CI:1.05-2.32, P = 0.027) and a protective factor for overweight patients (HR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.63-0.89, P = 0.001). However, for normal-weight patients, there was no significant statistical difference (HR = 0.88, 95%CI: 0.75-1.03, P = 0.108).

CONCLUSIONS

The impact of hyperlipidemia on the OS among patients with cancer varied by different BMI and hyperlipidemia types. BMI and hyperlipidemia type ought to be considered in combination to estimate the prognosis of patients with malignancy.

Clinicopathological characteristics of gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms: A comprehensive analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to explore the clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic implications of gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms (g-NENs).

METHODS

A retrospective enrollment of 142 patients diagnosed with g-NENs was conducted at Zhejiang Cancer Hospital between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2021. The study compared essential clinicopathological features and survival rates. Additionally, the prognosis of gastric neuroendocrine carcinomas/mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (g-NEC/MiNEN) were contrasted with those of gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC) and signet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC).

RESULTS

The study comprised a total of 142 g-NENs cases, with a male-to-female ratio of approximately 2:1. The 5-year survival rates for g-NEC and g-MiNEN were 26.7% and 35.2%, respectively. Corresponding 5-year survival rates for G1 and G2 were observed at 100% and 80.0%, respectively. g-NEC/MiNEN showed a significantly worse prognosis compared to g-NET (p < 0.001). g-NEC/MiNEN exhibited a poor prognosis compared to GAC (p < 0.001), and within poorly differentiated GAC, g-NEC/MiNEN demonstrated a worse prognosis (p = 0.007). Additionally, patients receiving postoperative adjuvant therapy exhibited notably prolonged overall survival (OS) in the case of g-NEC/MiNEN (p = 0.010).

CONCLUSION

In short, the prognosis of g-NEC/MiNEN was worse than that of g-NET, GAC and poorly differentiated GAC, but this group benefit from postoperative adjuvant therapy.

Increased adipose tissue is associated with improved overall survival, independent of skeletal muscle mass in non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The prognostic significance of non-cancer-related prognostic factors, such as body composition, has gained extensive attention in oncological research. Compared with sarcopenia, the prognostic significance of adipose tissue for overall survival in non-small cell lung cancer remains unclear. We investigated the prognostic value of skeletal muscle and adipose tissue in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 4434 patients diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer between January 2014 and December 2016. Cross-sectional areas of skeletal muscle and subcutaneous fat were measured, and the pericardial fat volume was automatically calculated. The skeletal muscle index and subcutaneous fat index were calculated as skeletal muscle area and subcutaneous fat area divided by height squared, respectively, and the pericardial fat index was calculated as pericardial fat volume divided by body surface area. The association between body composition and outcomes was evaluated using Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

A total of 750 patients (501 males [66.8%] and 249 females [33.2%]; mean age, 60.9 ± 9.8 years) were included. Sarcopenia (60.8% vs. 52.7%; P < 0.001), decreased subcutaneous fat index (51.4% vs. 25.2%; P < 0.001) and decreased pericardial fat index (55.4% vs. 16.5%; P < 0.001) were more commonly found in the deceased group than survived group. In multivariable Cox regression analysis, after adjusting for clinical variables, increased subcutaneous fat index (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.56, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.47-0.66, P < 0.001) and increased pericardial fat index (HR = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.40-0.56, P < 0.001) were associated with longer overall survival. For stage I-III patients, increased subcutaneous fat index (HR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.48-0.76, P < 0.001) and increased pericardial fat index (HR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.34-0.54, P < 0.001) were associated with better 5-year overall survival rate. Similar results were recorded in stage IV patients. For patients with surgery, the prognostic value of increased subcutaneous fat index (HR = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.44-0.80, P = 0.001) and increased pericardial fat index (HR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.38-0.68, P < 0.001) remained and predicted favourable overall survival. Non-surgical patients showed similar results as surgical patients. No association was noted between sarcopenia and overall survival (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Increased subcutaneous fat index and pericardial fat index were associated with a higher 5-year overall survival rate, independent of sarcopenia, in non-small cell lung cancer and may indicate a reduced risk of non-cancer-related death.

Obesity, the Adipose Organ and Cancer in Humans: Association or Causation?

Epidemiological observations, experimental studies and clinical data show that obesity is associated with a higher risk of developing different types of cancer; however, proof of a cause-effect relationship that meets the causality criteria is still lacking. Several data suggest that the adipose organ could be the protagonist in this crosstalk. In particular, the adipose tissue (AT) alterations occurring in obesity parallel some tumour behaviours, such as their theoretically unlimited expandability, infiltration capacity, angiogenesis regulation, local and systemic inflammation and changes to the immunometabolism and secretome. Moreover, AT and cancer share similar morpho-functional units which regulate tissue expansion: the adiponiche and tumour-niche, respectively. Through direct and indirect interactions involving different cellular types and molecular mechanisms, the obesity-altered adiponiche contributes to cancer development, progression, metastasis and chemoresistance. Moreover, modifications to the gut microbiome and circadian rhythm disruption also play important roles. Clinical studies clearly demonstrate that weight loss is associated with a decreased risk of developing obesity-related cancers, matching the reverse-causality criteria and providing a causality correlation between the two variables. Here, we provide an overview of the methodological, epidemiological and pathophysiological aspects, with a special focus on clinical implications for cancer risk and prognosis and potential therapeutic interventions.

Exploring the Relationship between Obesity, Metabolic Syndrome and Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

Obesity is a major burden for modern medicine, with many links to negative health outcomes, including the increased incidence of certain cancer types. Interestingly, some studies have supported the concept of an “Obesity Paradox”, where some cancer patients living with obesity have been shown to have a better prognosis than non-obese patients. Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are malignancies originating from neuroendocrine cells, in some cases retaining important functional properties with consequences for metabolism and nutritional status. In this review, we summarize the existing evidence demonstrating that obesity is both a risk factor for developing NENs as well as a good prognostic factor. We further identify the limitations of existing studies and further avenues of research that will be necessary to optimize the metabolic and nutritional status of patients living with NENs to ensure improved outcomes.

Inflammation Related to Obesity in the Etiopathogenesis of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) are rare neoplasms, which, due to their heterogeneous nature, non-specific symptoms, and lack of specific tumor markers pose many diagnostic and clinical challenges. In recent years, the effectiveness of GEP-NEN diagnosis has increased, which is probably associated with the greater availability of diagnostic tests and the cooperation of many experienced specialists in various scientific disciplines. In addition to the possible genetic etiology, the cause of GEP-NET development is not fully understood. Inflammation and obesity are known risks that contribute to the development of many diseases. Chronic inflammation accompanying obesity affects the hormonal balance and cell proliferation and causes the impairment of the immune system function, leading to neoplastic transformation. This review explores the role of inflammation and obesity in GEP-NETs. The exact mechanisms inducing tumor growth are unknown; however, the profile of inflammatory factors released in the GEP-NET tumor microenvironment is responsible for the progression or inhibition of tumor growth. Both the excess of adipose tissue and the impaired function of the immune system affect not only the initiation of cancer but also reduce the comfort and lifetime of patients.