1
|
Clement D, Brown S, Leerdam MV, Tesselaar M, Ramage J, Srirajaskanthan R. Sarcopenia and Neuroendocrine Neoplasms. Curr Oncol Rep 2024; 26:121-128. [PMID: 38270848 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-024-01494-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 01/26/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW To summarise the current literature regarding the presence of sarcopenia in patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). These are uncommon cancers separated into well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma (NECs). For the diagnosis of sarcopenia, there needs to be low muscle strength and low muscle quantity/quality. RECENT FINDINGS Five studies exist describing either low muscle strength or low muscle quantity in patients with NETs. The studies used different techniques to analyse muscle strength and muscle quantity, included heterogeneous populations, and performed the analysis at different time points following the diagnosis of the NET. Only 2 studies regarding patients with NECs could be found, both included mainly patients with a mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma (MiNEN) and are, therefore, difficult to interpret for patients with a NEC. The main findings of this review are to describe the presence of sarcopenia in patients with NENs. However, results should be interpreted with caution, and future research should focus on the correct technique, homogenous population and same time point.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dominique Clement
- Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital ENETS Centre of Excellence, London, UK.
- Department of Gastroenterology, King's College Hospital, London, UK.
| | - Sarah Brown
- Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital ENETS Centre of Excellence, London, UK
| | - Monique V Leerdam
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Margot Tesselaar
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - John Ramage
- Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital ENETS Centre of Excellence, London, UK
| | - Rajaventhan Srirajaskanthan
- Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital ENETS Centre of Excellence, London, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, King's College Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
van Leeuwen M, Kieffer JM, Young TE, Annunziata MA, Arndt V, Arraras JI, Autran D, Hani HB, Chakrabarti M, Chinot O, Cho J, da Costa Vieira RA, Darlington AS, Debruyne PR, Dirven L, Doege D, Eller Y, Eichler M, Fridriksdottir N, Gioulbasanis I, Hammerlid E, van Hemelrijck M, Hermann S, Husson O, Jefford M, Johansen C, Kjaer TK, Kontogianni M, Lagergren P, Lidington E, Lisy K, Morag O, Nordin A, Al Omari ASH, Pace A, De Padova S, Petranovia D, Pinto M, Ramage J, Rammant E, Reijneveld J, Serpentini S, Sodergren S, Vassiliou V, Leeuw IVD, Vistad I, Young T, Aaronson NK, van de Poll-Franse LV. Phase III study of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life cancer survivorship core questionnaire. J Cancer Surviv 2023; 17:1111-1130. [PMID: 35088246 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-021-01160-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2021] [Accepted: 12/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study is to develop a European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Group (EORTC QLG) questionnaire that captures the full range of physical, mental, and social health-related quality of life (HRQOL) issues relevant to disease-free cancer survivors. In this phase III study, we pretested the provisional core questionnaire (QLQ-SURV111) and aimed to identify essential and optional scales. METHODS We pretested the QLQ-SURV111 in 492 cancer survivors from 17 countries with one of 11 cancer diagnoses. We applied the EORTC QLG decision rules and employed factor analysis and item response theory (IRT) analysis to assess and, where necessary, modify the hypothesized questionnaire scales. We calculated correlations between the survivorship scales and the QLQ-C30 summary score and carried out a Delphi survey among healthcare professionals, patient representatives, and cancer researchers to distinguish between essential and optional scales. RESULTS Fifty-four percent of the sample was male, mean age was 60 years, and, on average, time since completion of treatment was 3.8 years. Eleven items were excluded, resulting in the QLQ-SURV100, with 12 functional and 9 symptom scales, a symptom checklist, 4 single items, and 10 conditional items. The essential survivorship scales consist of 73 items. CONCLUSIONS The QLQ-SURV100 has been developed to assess comprehensively the HRQOL of disease-free cancer survivors. It includes essential and optional scales and will be validated further in an international phase IV study. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS The availability of this questionnaire will facilitate a standardized and robust assessment of the HRQOL of disease-free cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marieke van Leeuwen
- Division of Psychosocial Research & Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Jacobien M Kieffer
- Division of Psychosocial Research & Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Teresa E Young
- Lynda Jackson Macmillan Centre, North Hertfordshire NHS Trust Including Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, East &, Northwood, UK
| | | | - Volker Arndt
- Unit of Cancer Survivorship Research, Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research & Epidemiological Cancer Registry Baden-Wurttemberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Didier Autran
- Pole Neurosciences Cliniques, Service de Neuro-Oncologie, Aix-Marseille Universite, Marseille, France
| | | | | | - Olivier Chinot
- Pole Neurosciences Cliniques, Service de Neuro-Oncologie, Aix-Marseille Universite, Marseille, France
| | - Juhee Cho
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Cancer Education Center, Samsung Medical Center, School of Medicine Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea
| | | | | | - Philip R Debruyne
- Kortrijk Cancer Centre, General Hospital Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Linda Dirven
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Daniela Doege
- Unit of Cancer Survivorship Research, Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research & Epidemiological Cancer Registry Baden-Wurttemberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Yannick Eller
- Centre for Medical Education, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Martin Eichler
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC), University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Nanna Fridriksdottir
- National University Hospital of Iceland, Ugo De Giorgi, Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, 47014, Italy
| | | | - Eva Hammerlid
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Goteborg, Sweden
| | - Mieke van Hemelrijck
- Translational Oncology & Urology Research (TOUR), School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Silke Hermann
- Epidemiological Cancer Registry Baden-Wurttemberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Olga Husson
- Division of Clinical Studies, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Michael Jefford
- Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Christoffer Johansen
- Oncology Clinic, Finsen Center, Copenhagen Colin Johnson, University Surgical Unit, University Hospitals Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Trille Kristina Kjaer
- Survivorship and Inequality in Cancer, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Meropi Kontogianni
- Department of Nutrition & Dietetics, School of Health Sciences and Education, Harokopio University, Athens, Greece
| | - Pernilla Lagergren
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Karolina Lisy
- Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Ofir Morag
- Oncology Institute, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel
| | - Andy Nordin
- East Kent Gynaecological Oncology Centre, Margate, UK
| | | | - Andrea Pace
- Neuroncology Unit, National Cancer Institute Regina Elena, Rome, Italy
| | - Silvia De Padova
- Psycho-Oncology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, 47014, Italy
| | - Duska Petranovia
- Hematology Department, University Clinical Hospital Center Rijeka, Medical Faculty University of Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia
| | - Monica Pinto
- Rehabilitation Medicine Unit, Department of Strategic Health Services, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - John Ramage
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Basingstoke, UK
| | - Elke Rammant
- Translational Oncology & Urology Research (TOUR), School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Jaap Reijneveld
- Department of Neurology and Brain Tumor Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Samantha Serpentini
- Unit of Psychoncology-Breast Unit, Istituto Oncologico Veneto (IOV)-IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Sam Sodergren
- School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Vassilios Vassiliou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Bank of Cyprus Oncology Centre, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Irma Verdonck-de Leeuw
- Department of Otolaryngology / Head & Neck Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ingvild Vistad
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Sorlandet Hospital Kristiansand, Kristiansand, Norway
| | - Teresa Young
- Lynda Jackson Macmillan Centre, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK
| | - Neil K Aaronson
- Division of Psychosocial Research & Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Panzuto F, Ramage J, Pritchard DM, van Velthuysen MLF, Schrader J, Begum N, Sundin A, Falconi M, O'Toole D. European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) 2023 guidance paper for gastroduodenal neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) G1-G3. J Neuroendocrinol 2023; 35:e13306. [PMID: 37401795 DOI: 10.1111/jne.13306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2023] [Revised: 05/09/2023] [Accepted: 05/10/2023] [Indexed: 07/05/2023]
Abstract
The aim of the present guidance paper was to update the previous ENETS guidelines on well-differentiated gastric and duodenal neuroendocrine tumours (NETs), providing practical guidance for specialists in the diagnosis and management of gastroduodenal NETs. Type II gastric NETs, neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs), and functioning duodenal NETs are not covered, since they will be discussed in other ENETS guidance papers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Panzuto
- Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Digestive Disease Unit, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, ENETS Center of Excellence, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - John Ramage
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hampshire Hospitals and ENETS Center, Kings Health Partners London, London, United Kingdom
| | - D Mark Pritchard
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | | | - Joerg Schrader
- Department of Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Nehara Begum
- Department for General-, Visceral-, Thoracic- and Endocrine Surgery, Johannes-Wesling-Klinikum Minden, University Hospital of the Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Anders Sundin
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Radiology & Molecular Imaging, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Massimo Falconi
- Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, Pancreatic Surgery Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Dermot O'Toole
- National Centre for Neuroendocrine Tumours, ENETS Centre of Excellence, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rinke A, Ambrosini V, Dromain C, Garcia-Carbonero R, Haji A, Koumarianou A, van Dijkum EN, O'Toole D, Rindi G, Scoazec JY, Ramage J. European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) 2023 guidance paper for colorectal neuroendocrine tumours. J Neuroendocrinol 2023; 35:e13309. [PMID: 37345509 DOI: 10.1111/jne.13309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2023] [Revised: 05/12/2023] [Accepted: 05/13/2023] [Indexed: 06/23/2023]
Abstract
This ENETS guidance paper, developed by a multidisciplinary working group, provides an update on the previous colorectal guidance paper in a different format. Guided by key clinical questions practical advice on the diagnosis and management of neuroendocrine tumours (NET) of the caecum, colon, and rectum is provided. Although covered in one guidance paper colorectal NET comprises a heterogeneous group of neoplasms. The most common rectal NET are often small G1 tumours that can be treated by adequate endoscopic resection techniques. Evidence from prospective clinical trials on the treatment of metastatic colorectal NET is limited and discussion of patients in experienced multidisciplinary tumour boards strongly recommended. Neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC) and mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNEN) are discussed in a separate guidance paper.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anja Rinke
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Marburg and Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Valentina Ambrosini
- Nuclear Medicine, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- IRCSS, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Clarisse Dromain
- Department of Radiology, CHUV Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | - Amyn Haji
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, King's College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Anna Koumarianou
- Hematology Oncology Unit, Fourth Department of Internal Medicine, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Els Nieveen van Dijkum
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dermot O'Toole
- NET Center of Excellence, St Vincent's University Hospital and St James Hospital Dublin 8 and Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Guido Rindi
- Section of Anatomic Pathology, Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore; Unit of Head and Neck, Thoracic and Endcorine Pathology, Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS; Roma European NeuroEndocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) Center of Excellence, Rome, Italy
| | - Jean-Yves Scoazec
- Department of Pathology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France, Université Paris Saclay, Faculté de Médecine, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, Villejuif, France
| | - John Ramage
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hampshire Hospitals and ENETS Center, Kings Health Partners London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Nesti C, Bräutigam K, Benavent M, Bernal L, Boharoon H, Botling J, Bouroumeau A, Brcic I, Brunner M, Cadiot G, Camara M, Christ E, Clerici T, Clift AK, Clouston H, Cobianchi L, Ćwikła JB, Daskalakis K, Frilling A, Garcia-Carbonero R, Grozinsky-Glasberg S, Hernando J, Hervieu V, Hofland J, Holmager P, Inzani F, Jann H, Jimenez-Fonseca P, Kaçmaz E, Kaemmerer D, Kaltsas G, Klimacek B, Knigge U, Kolasińska-Ćwikła A, Kolb W, Kos-Kudła B, Kunze CA, Landolfi S, La Rosa S, López CL, Lorenz K, Matter M, Mazal P, Mestre-Alagarda C, Del Burgo PM, van Dijkum EJMN, Oleinikov K, Orci LA, Panzuto F, Pavel M, Perrier M, Reims HM, Rindi G, Rinke A, Rinzivillo M, Sagaert X, Satiroglu I, Selberherr A, Siebenhüner AR, Tesselaar MET, Thalhammer MJ, Thiis-Evensen E, Toumpanakis C, Vandamme T, van den Berg JG, Vanoli A, van Velthuysen MLF, Verslype C, Vorburger SA, Lugli A, Ramage J, Zwahlen M, Perren A, Kaderli RM. Hemicolectomy versus appendectomy for patients with appendiceal neuroendocrine tumours 1-2 cm in size: a retrospective, Europe-wide, pooled cohort study. Lancet Oncol 2023; 24:187-194. [PMID: 36640790 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(22)00750-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2022] [Revised: 12/06/2022] [Accepted: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Awareness of the potential global overtreatment of patients with appendiceal neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) of 1-2 cm in size by performing oncological resections is increasing, but the rarity of this tumour has impeded clear recommendations to date. We aimed to assess the malignant potential of appendiceal NETs of 1-2 cm in size in patients with or without right-sided hemicolectomy. METHODS In this retrospective cohort study, we pooled data from 40 hospitals in 15 European countries for patients of any age and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status with a histopathologically confirmed appendiceal NET of 1-2 cm in size who had a complete resection of the primary tumour between Jan 1, 2000, and Dec 31, 2010. Patients either had an appendectomy only or an appendectomy with oncological right-sided hemicolectomy or ileocecal resection. Predefined primary outcomes were the frequency of distant metastases and tumour-related mortality. Secondary outcomes included the frequency of regional lymph node metastases, the association between regional lymph node metastases and histopathological risk factors, and overall survival with or without right-sided hemicolectomy. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate the relative all-cause mortality hazard associated with right-sided hemicolectomy compared with appendectomy alone. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03852693. FINDINGS 282 patients with suspected appendiceal tumours were identified, of whom 278 with an appendiceal NET of 1-2 cm in size were included. 163 (59%) had an appendectomy and 115 (41%) had a right-sided hemicolectomy, 110 (40%) were men, 168 (60%) were women, and mean age at initial surgery was 36·0 years (SD 18·2). Median follow-up was 13·0 years (IQR 11·0-15·6). After centralised histopathological review, appendiceal NETs were classified as a possible or probable primary tumour in two (1%) of 278 patients with distant peritoneal metastases and in two (1%) 278 patients with distant metastases in the liver. All metastases were diagnosed synchronously with no tumour-related deaths during follow-up. Regional lymph node metastases were found in 22 (20%) of 112 patients with right-sided hemicolectomy with available data. On the basis of histopathological risk factors, we estimated that 12·8% (95% CI 6·5 -21·1) of patients undergoing appendectomy probably had residual regional lymph node metastases. Overall survival was similar between patients with appendectomy and right-sided hemicolectomy (adjusted hazard ratio 0·88 [95% CI 0·36-2·17]; p=0·71). INTERPRETATION This study provides evidence that right-sided hemicolectomy is not indicated after complete resection of an appendiceal NET of 1-2 cm in size by appendectomy, that regional lymph node metastases of appendiceal NETs are clinically irrelevant, and that an additional postoperative exclusion of metastases and histopathological evaluation of risk factors is not supported by the presented results. These findings should inform consensus best practice guidelines for this patient cohort. FUNDING Swiss Cancer Research foundation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cédric Nesti
- Department of Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Marta Benavent
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Instituto de Biomedicina De Sevilla, Seville, Spain
| | - Laura Bernal
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Instituto de Biomedicina De Sevilla, Seville, Spain
| | - Hessa Boharoon
- Neuroendocrine Tumour Unit-ENETS Centre of Excellence, Royal Free Hospital London, London, UK
| | - Johan Botling
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Antonin Bouroumeau
- Division of Clinical Pathology, Diagnostic Department, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Iva Brcic
- Diagnostic and Research Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Maximilian Brunner
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuernberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Guillaume Cadiot
- Service d'Hépato-gastroentérologie et d'Oncologie Digestive, Université Reims Champagne Ardenne, CHU de Reims, Reims, France
| | - Maria Camara
- Pathology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Imas12, UCM, Madrid, Spain
| | - Emanuel Christ
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetology and Metabolism, ENETS Center of Excellence, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Clerici
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral-, Endokrin- und Transplantationschirurgie, Kantonsspital St Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Ashley K Clift
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Hamish Clouston
- Colorectal and Peritoneal Oncology Centre, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Lorenzo Cobianchi
- Department of Clinical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy; Department of General Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Fondazione, Pavia, Italy
| | | | - Kosmas Daskalakis
- 1st Department of Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, Endocrine Unit, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, ENETS Center of Excellence, Athens, Greece
| | - Andrea Frilling
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | | | - Simona Grozinsky-Glasberg
- Neuroendocrine Tumor Unit, ENETS Center of Excellence, Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Hadassah Medical Organization and Faculty of Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Jorge Hernando
- Medical Oncology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital-Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Johannes Hofland
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Endocrinology ENETS Center of Excellence and Erasmus Cancer Institute, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Pernille Holmager
- ENETS Neuroendocrine Tumor Centre of Excellence, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Endocrinology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Frediano Inzani
- General Pathology, Department of Woman and Child Health Science and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Roma European NeuroEndocrine Tumor Society Center of Excellence, Rome, Italy
| | - Henning Jann
- Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Paula Jimenez-Fonseca
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, ISPA, Oviedo, Spain
| | - Enes Kaçmaz
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Daniel Kaemmerer
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Zentralklinik Bad Berka, Bad Berka, Germany
| | - Gregory Kaltsas
- 1st Department of Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, Endocrine Unit, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, ENETS Center of Excellence, Athens, Greece
| | - Branislav Klimacek
- Department of Surgery, Endocrine Surgical Unit, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Ulrich Knigge
- ENETS Neuroendocrine Tumor Centre of Excellence, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Endocrinology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Surgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Walter Kolb
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral-, Endokrin- und Transplantationschirurgie, Kantonsspital St Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Beata Kos-Kudła
- Department of Endocrinology and Neuroendocrine Neoplasms and Department of Endocrinology and Pathophysiology, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
| | - Catarina Alisa Kunze
- Institute of Pathology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Stefania Landolfi
- Pathology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Stefano La Rosa
- Institute of Pathology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland; Unit of Pathology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Carlos López López
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, IDIVAL, Santander, Spain
| | - Kerstin Lorenz
- Department of Visceral, Vascular, and Endocrine Surgery, Martin-Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
| | - Maurice Matter
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Peter Mazal
- Department of Clinical Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, General Hospital Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | | | | | - Kira Oleinikov
- Neuroendocrine Tumor Unit, ENETS Center of Excellence, Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Hadassah Medical Organization and Faculty of Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Lorenzo A Orci
- Division of Abdominal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Francesco Panzuto
- Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy; Digestive Disease Unit, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, ENETS Center of Excellence, Rome, Italy
| | - Marianne Pavel
- Department of Medicine 1, Friedrich Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Marine Perrier
- Service d'Hépato-gastroentérologie et d'Oncologie Digestive, Université Reims Champagne Ardenne, CHU de Reims, Reims, France
| | - Henrik Mikael Reims
- Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Guido Rindi
- Unit of Head and Neck, Lung, and Endocrine Pathology, Department of Woman and Child Health Science and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Roma European NeuroEndocrine Tumor Society Center of Excellence, Rome, Italy; Section of Anatomic Pathology, Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Anja Rinke
- Department of Gastroenterology and Endocrinology, UKGM, Marburg, Germany; Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Maria Rinzivillo
- Digestive Disease Unit, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, ENETS Center of Excellence, Rome, Italy
| | - Xavier Sagaert
- Translational Cell & Tissue Research, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ilker Satiroglu
- Department of Visceral, Vascular, and Endocrine Surgery, Martin-Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
| | - Andreas Selberherr
- Division of Visceral Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Alexander R Siebenhüner
- Klinik für Medizinische Onkologie und Hämatologie, Universitätsspital Zürich und Universität Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland; Departement Medizinische Onkologie, Kantonsspital Schaffhausen, Schaffhausen, Switzerland
| | - Margot E T Tesselaar
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Michael J Thalhammer
- Department of Surgery, Division of Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Espen Thiis-Evensen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Christos Toumpanakis
- Neuroendocrine Tumour Unit-ENETS Centre of Excellence, Royal Free Hospital London, London, UK
| | | | - José G van den Berg
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Alessandro Vanoli
- Unit of Anatomic Pathology, Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy; Unit of Anatomic Pathology, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | | | - Chris Verslype
- Clinical Digestive Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium
| | | | | | - John Ramage
- University of Winchester, Winchester, UK; Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke, UK
| | - Marcel Zwahlen
- Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Aurel Perren
- Institute of Pathology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Reto M Kaderli
- Department of Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
George J, Ramage J, White B, Srirajaskanthan R. The role of serotonin inhibition within the treatment of carcinoid syndrome. Endocr Oncol 2023; 3:e220077. [PMID: 37434648 PMCID: PMC10305560 DOI: 10.1530/eo-22-0077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2023] [Accepted: 04/20/2023] [Indexed: 07/13/2023]
Abstract
Carcinoid syndrome is the most frequent hormonal complication associated with neuroendocrine neoplasms. It was first reported in 1954, and the classical symptoms are diarrhoea, flushing and abdominal pain. It is caused by the secretion of several vasoactive substances, the most prominent being serotonin, which play a pathophysiological role in the clinical symptoms which characterise carcinoid syndrome. Therefore, the focus of carcinoid syndrome treatment is to reduce serotonin production and hence improve the patient's quality of life. There are a variety of management options for carcinoid syndrome including medical, surgical and loco-regional interventional radiological procedures. The most widely used are somatostatin analogues with three clinically approved drugs: lanreotide and octreotide (first-generation) and pasireotide (second-generation). Both everolimus and interferon used in combination with octreotide have shown significant reduction in urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid compared to octreotide alone. Telotristat ethyl has been increasingly utilised for patients with symptoms despite taking somatostatin analogues. It has also been shown to have a significant improvement in bowel movement frequency which was associated with a significant improvement in quality of life. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy has proven symptomatic improvement in patients with uncontrolled symptoms. Chemotherapy is primarily reserved for patients with high proliferation tumours, with limited research on the efficacy in reducing symptoms. Surgical resection remains the optimal treatment due to being the only one that can achieve a cure. Liver-directed therapies are considered in patients where curative resection is not possible. There are therefore numerous different therapies. This paper describes the pathophysiology and therapy of carcinoid syndrome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joel George
- Hampshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Basingstoke, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - John Ramage
- Hampshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Basingstoke, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Benjamin White
- Hampshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Basingstoke, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Rajaventhan Srirajaskanthan
- Kings Health Partners NET Centre of Excellence, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Partelli S, Massironi S, Zerbi A, Niccoli P, Kwon W, Landoni L, Panzuto F, Tomazic A, Bongiovanni A, Kaltsas G, Sauvanet A, Bertani E, Mazzaferro V, Caplin M, Armstrong T, Weickert MO, Ramage J, Segelov E, Butturini G, Staettner S, Cives M, Frilling A, Moulton CA, He J, Boesch F, Selberheer A, Twito O, Castaldi A, De Angelis CG, Gaujoux S, Holzer K, Wilson CH, Almeamar H, Vigia E, Muffatti F, Lucà M, Lania A, Ewald J, Kim H, Salvia R, Rinzivillo M, Smid A, Gardini A, Tsoli M, Hentic O, Colombo S, Citterio D, Toumpanakis C, Ramsey E, Randeva HS, Srirajaskanthan R, Croagh D, Regi P, Gasteiger S, Invernizzi P, Ridolfi C, Giovannini M, Jang JY, Bassi C, Falconi M. Management of asymptomatic sporadic non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms no larger than 2 cm: interim analysis of prospective ASPEN trial. Br J Surg 2022; 109:1186-1190. [PMID: 35986682 PMCID: PMC10364756 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2022] [Revised: 05/18/2022] [Accepted: 07/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Partelli
- School of Medicine, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.,Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Centre, Pancreatic Surgery Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Sara Massironi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Centre for Autoimmune Liver Diseases, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy.,Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | - Alessandro Zerbi
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.,IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Patricia Niccoli
- Department of Medical Oncology, Paoli-Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France
| | - Wooil Kwon
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Luca Landoni
- General and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesco Panzuto
- Digestive Disease Unit, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Sant' Andrea University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Ales Tomazic
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, University Medical Centre, Ljubijana, Slovenia
| | - Alberto Bongiovanni
- Osteoncology and Rare Tumours Centre (CDO-TR), IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) 'Dino Amadori', Meldola, Italy
| | - Gregory Kaltsas
- First Propaedeutic Department of Internal Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Alain Sauvanet
- Department of Pancreatology, Hôpital Beaujon, University of Paris, Paris, France
| | - Emilio Bertani
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Mazzaferro
- Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Fondazione, IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori (INT, National Cancer Institute) and Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Martyn Caplin
- ENETS Centre of Excellence, Neuroendocrine Tumour Unit, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Thomas Armstrong
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Wessex NET Group ENETS Centre of Excellence, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Martin O Weickert
- ARDEN NET Centre, ENETS Centre of Excellence, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust and Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - John Ramage
- Kings Health Partners NET Centre, Kings College Hospital London, London, UK
| | - Eva Segelov
- Department of Oncology and Surgery (School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health), Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Stefan Staettner
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Salzkammergutklinikum Vöcklabruck, Vöcklabruck, Austria
| | - Mauro Cives
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari 'Aldo Moro', Bari, Italy
| | - Andrea Frilling
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Carol Anne Moulton
- Division of General Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Surgery, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jin He
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medical, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Florian Boesch
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Andreas Selberheer
- Section Endocrine Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University, Vienna, Austria
| | - Orit Twito
- Endocrine Institute, Meir Medical Center, Kfar-Sava, Israel.,Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Antonio Castaldi
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Claudio G De Angelis
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, City of Health and Science Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Sebastien Gaujoux
- Department of Digestive, Hepatobiliary and Endocrine Surgery, Paris Sorbonne University, Pitiè Salpétrière Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Katharina Holzer
- Department of Visceral-, Thoracic- and Vascular Surgery, Section of Endocrine Surgery, University Hospital Marburg (UKGM), Marburg, Germany
| | - Colin H Wilson
- Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Unit, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Hussein Almeamar
- National NET Centre and ENETS Centre of Excellence, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Emanuel Vigia
- Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic and Transplantation Centre, Curry Cabral Hospital, CHULC, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Francesca Muffatti
- School of Medicine, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.,Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Centre, Pancreatic Surgery Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Martina Lucà
- Division of Gastroenterology and Centre for Autoimmune Liver Diseases, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy.,Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | - Andrea Lania
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.,IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Jacques Ewald
- Department of Medical Oncology, Paoli-Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France
| | - Hongbeom Kim
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Roberto Salvia
- General and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Maria Rinzivillo
- Digestive Disease Unit, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Sant' Andrea University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Alojz Smid
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Centre Ljubijana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Andrea Gardini
- General and Oncological Surgery Unit, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forlì, Italy
| | - Marina Tsoli
- First Propaedeutic Department of Internal Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Olivia Hentic
- Department of Pancreatology, Hôpital Beaujon, University of Paris, Paris, France
| | - Samuele Colombo
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Davide Citterio
- Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Fondazione, IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori (INT, National Cancer Institute) and Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Christos Toumpanakis
- ENETS Centre of Excellence, Neuroendocrine Tumour Unit, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Emma Ramsey
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Wessex NET Group ENETS Centre of Excellence, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | | | | | - Daniel Croagh
- Department of Oncology and Surgery (School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health), Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Paolo Regi
- Department of Surgery, Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Italy
| | - Silvia Gasteiger
- Department of Visceral, Transplantation and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Pietro Invernizzi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Centre for Autoimmune Liver Diseases, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy.,Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | - Cristina Ridolfi
- Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital-IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Marc Giovannini
- Department of Medical Oncology, Paoli-Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France
| | - Jin-Young Jang
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Claudio Bassi
- General and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Massimo Falconi
- School of Medicine, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.,Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Centre, Pancreatic Surgery Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lamarca A, Palmer D, Wasan H, Ross P, Ma Y, Arora A, Falk S, Gillmore R, Wadsley J, Patel K, Anthoney A, Maravellas A, Waters J, Hoobs C, Macdonald T, Ryder D, Ramage J, Davies L, Bridgewater J, Valle J. 54MO Quality of life (QoL) and value of health (V-He) in advanced biliary cancers (ABC) treated with second-line active-symptom-control (ASC) alone or ASC with oxaliplatin/5-FU chemotherapy (ASC+FOLFOX) in the randomised phase III, multi-centre, open-label ABC-06 trial. Ann Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.07.082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022] Open
|
9
|
Lamarca A, Palmer D, Wasan H, Ross P, Ting Ma Y, Arora A, Falk S, Gillmore R, Wadsley J, Patel K, Anthoney A, Maraveyas A, Waters J, Hoobs C, Macdonald T, Ryder D, Ramage J, Davies L, Bridgewater J, Valle J. P-88 Clinical role of tumour markers in advanced biliary cancers (ABC) treated with second-line active-symptom-control (ASC) alone or ASC with oxaliplatin/5-FU chemotherapy (ASC+mFOLFOX) in the randomised phase III, multi-centre, open-label ABC-06 trial. Ann Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.04.178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
|
10
|
Doornebal EJ, Harris N, Riva A, Jagatia R, Pizanias M, Prachalias A, Menon K, Preziosi M, Zamalloa A, Miquel R, Zen Y, Orford MR, Eaton S, Heaton N, Ramage J, Palma E, Srirajaskanthan R, Chokshi S. Human Immunocompetent Model of Neuroendocrine Liver Metastases Recapitulates Patient-Specific Tumour Microenvironment. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2022; 13:909180. [PMID: 35909511 PMCID: PMC9326114 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.909180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2022] [Accepted: 06/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Neuroendocrine liver metastases (LM-NEN) develop in a considerable proportion of patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms. There is a paucity of experimental models that accurately recapitulate this complex metastatic human liver microenvironment precluding scientific and clinical advancements. Here, we describe the development of a novel personalised immunocompetent precision cut tumour slice (PCTS) model for LM-NEN using resected human liver tissue. The histological assessment throughout the culture demonstrated that slices maintain viability for at least 7 days and retain the cellular heterogeneity of the original tumour. Essential clinical features, such as patient-specific histoarchitecture, tumour grade, neuroendocrine differentiation and metabolic capacity, are preserved in the slices. The PCTS also replicate the tumor-specific immunological profile as shown by the innate and adaptive immunity markers analysis. Furthermore, the study of soluble immune checkpoint receptors in the culture supernatants proves that these immunomodulators are actively produced by LM-NEN and suggests that this process is epithelium-dependent. This model can be employed to investigate these pathways and provides a powerful platform for mechanistic, immunological and pre-clinical studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ewald Jan Doornebal
- Foundation for Liver Research, The Roger Williams Institute of Hepatology, London, United Kingdom
- King’s College London, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nicola Harris
- Foundation for Liver Research, The Roger Williams Institute of Hepatology, London, United Kingdom
- King’s College London, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Antonio Riva
- Foundation for Liver Research, The Roger Williams Institute of Hepatology, London, United Kingdom
- King’s College London, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ravi Jagatia
- Foundation for Liver Research, The Roger Williams Institute of Hepatology, London, United Kingdom
- King’s College London, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Michail Pizanias
- Institute of Liver Studies, King’s College Hospital and King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Andreas Prachalias
- Institute of Liver Studies, King’s College Hospital and King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Krishna Menon
- Institute of Liver Studies, King’s College Hospital and King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Melissa Preziosi
- Institute of Liver Studies, King’s College Hospital and King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ane Zamalloa
- Institute of Liver Studies, King’s College Hospital and King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rosa Miquel
- Liver Histopathology Laboratory, Institute of Liver Studies, King’s College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Yoh Zen
- Liver Histopathology Laboratory, Institute of Liver Studies, King’s College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Robert Orford
- Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Simon Eaton
- Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nigel Heaton
- Institute of Liver Studies, King’s College Hospital and King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - John Ramage
- Institute of Liver Studies, King’s College Hospital and King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- Neuroendocrine Tumour Unit, ENETS Centre of Excellence, King’s College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Elena Palma
- Foundation for Liver Research, The Roger Williams Institute of Hepatology, London, United Kingdom
- King’s College London, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, London, United Kingdom
- *Correspondence: Shilpa Chokshi, ; Elena Palma,
| | - Rajaventhan Srirajaskanthan
- Institute of Liver Studies, King’s College Hospital and King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- Neuroendocrine Tumour Unit, ENETS Centre of Excellence, King’s College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Shilpa Chokshi
- Foundation for Liver Research, The Roger Williams Institute of Hepatology, London, United Kingdom
- King’s College London, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, London, United Kingdom
- *Correspondence: Shilpa Chokshi, ; Elena Palma,
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lamarca A, Palmer DH, Wasan HS, Ross PJ, Ma YT, Arora A, Falk S, Gillmore R, Wadsley J, Patel K, Anthoney A, Maraveyas A, Iveson T, Waters JS, Hobbs C, Barber S, Ryder WD, Ramage J, Davies LM, Bridgewater JA, Valle JW. Second-line FOLFOX chemotherapy for advanced biliary tract cancer - Authors' reply. Lancet Oncol 2021; 22:e288-e289. [PMID: 34197751 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(21)00341-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2021] [Accepted: 06/08/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Lamarca
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust/Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M20 4BX,, UK
| | - Daniel H Palmer
- University of Liverpool and Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Liverpool, UK
| | - Harpreet Singh Wasan
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial Colllege London, London, UK
| | - Paul J Ross
- Guy's Cancer, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Yuk Ting Ma
- Department of Hepatobiliary Oncology, University of Birmingham and University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Arvind Arora
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Nottingham NHS Trust, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Stephen Falk
- Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre, Bristol, UK
| | - Roopinder Gillmore
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Free NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Kinnari Patel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer and Haematology Centre, Oxford, UK
| | - Alan Anthoney
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Anthony Maraveyas
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull, UK
| | - Tim Iveson
- Department of Gastro- Intestinal Oncology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton University, Southampton, UK
| | | | - Claire Hobbs
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Great Western Hospital, Swindon, UK
| | - Safia Barber
- Manchester Clinical Trials Unit, University of Manchester, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
| | - W David Ryder
- Manchester Clinical Trials Unit, University of Manchester, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
| | - John Ramage
- Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Basingstoke, UK
| | - Linda M Davies
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, University of Manchester, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
| | | | - Juan W Valle
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust/Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M20 4BX,, UK; Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M20 4BX, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Clement D, Navalkissoor S, Srirajaskanthan R, Courbon F, Dierickx L, Eccles A, Lewington V, Mitjavila M, Percovich JC, Lequoy B, He B, Folitar I, Ramage J. Efficacy and safety of 177Lu-DOTATATE in patients (pts) with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs): Data from the NETTER-R international, retrospective registry. J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.4116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
4116 Background: Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with 177Lu-DOTATATE is indicated in somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-positive gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. The NETTER-R registry builds upon the existing evidence for pts with advanced pNETs, who have limited therapeutic options. Methods: NETTER-R is a retrospective registry of pts with unresectable or metastatic, well-differentiated, SSTR-positive, progressive pNETs treated with 177Lu-DOTATATE in the UK, France and Spain. Pts who received ≥1 administration of 177Lu-DOTATATE were included. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) based on RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), safety and tumour response. Results: A total of 110 pts with pNETs were identified. Median age was 58.0 years (range 28–89) and 52.7% were male. At baseline, 96.4% of pts had progressive disease. The Ki-67 index was ≤2% in 23.6%, 3–20% in 66.4% and >20% in 2.7% of pts (7.3% missing). Metastases were present in the liver in 95.5% and bone in 29.1% of pts. Nearly all pts (90.9%) had received at least one prior anticancer therapy (somatostatin analogues: 70.0%, chemotherapy: 61.8%, protein kinase inhibitors: 38.2%). The majority of pts (70.0%) received all four scheduled cycles of 177Lu-DOTATATE. The cumulative activity was 26.6–32.6 GBq in 65.5% of pts (<26.6 GBq: 31.8%, ≥32.6 GBq: 2.7%). 12 pts were re-treated after disease progression and received 1–4 additional cycles of 177Lu-DOTATATE. By RECIST v1.1, evaluable in 62 pts, median PFS was 24.8 months (95% CI 17.5–34.5) and objective response rate was 40.3% (95% CI 28.1–53.6); all responses were partial. The response rate, including radiological, clinical, metabolic and biomarker assessments, evaluable in 100 pts, was 54.0% (95% CI 43.7–64.0), including 2 pts with complete response. Over a median follow-up of 24.5 months (range 2.0–123.4), median OS in 110 pts was 41.4 months (95% CI 28.6–50.2). 71.8% (n=79/110) of pts had at least one treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE). The most frequent were nausea (28.2%) and fatigue (22.7%), predominantly grade 1/2 in severity. No TEAEs led to treatment discontinuation. Grade 3 anaemia and lymphopenia occurred in 1 (0.9%) and 4 (3.6%) pts, respectively. No grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia or neutropenia were reported. Renal TEAEs occurred in 6 pts (5.5%; grade 1: n=1, grade 2: n=2, grade 3: n=3). Grade 3 renal events were transient (≤24 days) and did not lead to treatment modification. No acute leukaemia or myelodysplastic syndrome were reported within the follow-up. Conclusions: In a real-world population of pts with advanced pNETs, 177Lu-DOTATATE was well tolerated with a safety profile consistent with the NETTER-1 trial. With limited follow-up, the OS and PFS compared favourably with cohorts of progressive pNET patients treated with other systemic agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Frédéric Courbon
- Institut Universitaire du Cancer Toulouse Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Lawrence Dierickx
- Institut Universitaire du Cancer Toulouse Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Amy Eccles
- Guy's and St. Thomas’ Hospitals, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | - Benoît Lequoy
- Advanced Accelerator Applications, A Novartis Company, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Beilei He
- Advanced Accelerator Applications, A Novartis Company, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Ilya Folitar
- Advanced Accelerator Applications, A Novartis Company, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - John Ramage
- King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Lamarca A, Palmer DH, Wasan HS, Ross PJ, Ma YT, Arora A, Falk S, Gillmore R, Wadsley J, Patel K, Anthoney A, Maraveyas A, Iveson T, Waters JS, Hobbs C, Barber S, Ryder WD, Ramage J, Davies LM, Bridgewater JA, Valle JW. Second-line FOLFOX chemotherapy versus active symptom control for advanced biliary tract cancer (ABC-06): a phase 3, open-label, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2021; 22:690-701. [PMID: 33798493 PMCID: PMC8082275 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(21)00027-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 335] [Impact Index Per Article: 111.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2020] [Revised: 01/04/2021] [Accepted: 01/12/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advanced biliary tract cancer has a poor prognosis. Cisplatin and gemcitabine is the standard first-line chemotherapy regimen, but no robust evidence is available for second-line chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to determine the benefit derived from second-line FOLFOX (folinic acid, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin) chemotherapy in advanced biliary tract cancer. METHODS The ABC-06 clinical trial was a phase 3, open-label, randomised trial done in 20 sites with expertise in managing biliary tract cancer across the UK. Adult patients (aged ≥18 years) who had histologically or cytologically verified locally advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancer (including cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder or ampullary carcinoma) with documented radiological disease progression to first-line cisplatin and gemcitabine chemotherapy and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1 were randomly assigned (1:1) centrally to active symptom control (ASC) and FOLFOX or ASC alone. FOLFOX chemotherapy was administered intravenously every 2 weeks for a maximum of 12 cycles (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2, L-folinic acid 175 mg [or folinic acid 350 mg], fluorouracil 400 mg/m2 [bolus], and fluorouracil 2400 mg/m2 as a 46-h continuous intravenous infusion). Randomisation was done following a minimisation algorithm using platinum sensitivity, serum albumin concentration, and stage as stratification factors. The primary endpoint was overall survival, assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was also assessed in the intention-to-treat population. The study is complete and the final results are reported. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01926236, and EudraCT, 2013-001812-30. FINDINGS Between March 27, 2014, and Jan 4, 2018, 162 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to ASC plus FOLFOX (n=81) or ASC alone (n=81). Median follow-up was 21·7 months (IQR 17·2-30·8). Overall survival was significantly longer in the ASC plus FOLFOX group than in the ASC alone group, with a median overall survival of 6·2 months (95% CI 5·4-7·6) in the ASC plus FOLFOX group versus 5·3 months (4·1-5·8) in the ASC alone group (adjusted hazard ratio 0·69 [95% CI 0·50-0·97]; p=0·031). The overall survival rate in the ASC alone group was 35·5% (95% CI 25·2-46·0) at 6 months and 11·4% (5·6-19·5) at 12 months, compared with 50·6% (39·3-60·9) at 6 months and 25·9% (17·0-35·8) at 12 months in the ASC plus FOLFOX group. Grade 3-5 adverse events were reported in 42 (52%) of 81 patients in the ASC alone group and 56 (69%) of 81 patients in the ASC plus FOLFOX group, including three chemotherapy-related deaths (one each due to infection, acute kidney injury, and febrile neutropenia). The most frequently reported grade 3-5 FOLFOX-related adverse events were neutropenia (ten [12%] patients), fatigue or lethargy (nine [11%] patients), and infection (eight [10%] patients). INTERPRETATION The addition of FOLFOX to ASC improved median overall survival in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer after progression on cisplatin and gemcitabine, with a clinically meaningful increase in 6-month and 12-month overall survival rates. To our knowledge, this trial is the first prospective, randomised study providing reliable, high-quality evidence to allow an informed discussion with patients of the potential benefits and risks from second-line FOLFOX chemotherapy in advanced biliary tract cancer. Based on these findings, FOLFOX should become standard-of-care chemotherapy in second-line treatment for advanced biliary tract cancer and the reference regimen for further clinical trials. FUNDING Cancer Research UK, StandUpToCancer, AMMF (The UK Cholangiocarcinoma Charity), and The Christie Charity, with additional funding from The Cholangiocarcinoma Foundation and the Conquer Cancer Foundation Young Investigator Award for translational research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Lamarca
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust/Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Daniel H Palmer
- University of Liverpool and Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Liverpool, UK
| | - Harpreet Singh Wasan
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial Colllege London, London, UK
| | - Paul J Ross
- Guy's Cancer, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Yuk Ting Ma
- Department of Hepatobiliary Oncology, University of Birmingham and University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Arvind Arora
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Nottingham NHS Trust, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Stephen Falk
- Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre, Bristol, UK
| | - Roopinder Gillmore
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Free NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Kinnari Patel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer and Haematology Centre, Oxford, UK
| | - Alan Anthoney
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Anthony Maraveyas
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull, UK
| | - Tim Iveson
- Department of Gastro-Intestinal Oncology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton University, Southampton, UK
| | | | - Claire Hobbs
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Great Western Hospital, Swindon, UK
| | - Safia Barber
- Manchester Clinical Trials Unit, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - W David Ryder
- Manchester Clinical Trials Unit, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - John Ramage
- Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Basingstoke, UK
| | - Linda M Davies
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Juan W Valle
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust/Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Cuthbertson DJ, Barriuso J, Lamarca A, Manoharan P, Westwood T, Jaffa M, Fenwick SW, Nuttall C, Lalloo F, Prachalias A, Pizanias M, Wieshmann H, McNamara MG, Hubner R, Srirajaskanthan R, Vivian G, Ramage J, Weickert MO, Pritchard DM, Vinjamuri S, Valle J, Yip VS. The Impact of 68Gallium DOTA PET/CT in Managing Patients With Sporadic and Familial Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumours. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2021; 12:654975. [PMID: 34163434 PMCID: PMC8215358 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2021.654975] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2021] [Accepted: 05/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (panNETs) arise sporadically or as part of a genetic predisposition syndrome. CT/MRI, endoscopic ultrasonography and functional imaging using Octreoscan localise and stage disease. This study aimed to evaluate the complementary role of 68Gallium (68Ga)-DOTA PET/CT in managing patients with panNETs. DESIGN A retrospective study conducted across three tertiary UK NET referral centres. METHODS Demographic, clinical, biochemical, cross-sectional and functional imaging data were collected from patients who had undergone a 68Ga-DOTA PET/CT scan for a suspected panNET. RESULTS We collected data for 183 patients (97 male): median (SD) age 63 (14.9) years, 89.1 vs. 9.3% (n=163 vs. 17) alive vs. dead (3 data missing), 141 sporadic vs. 42 familial (MEN1, n=36; 85.7%) panNETs. Non-functional vs. functional tumours comprised 73.2 vs. 21.3% (n=134 vs. 39) (10 missing). Histological confirmation was available in 89% of individuals (n=163) but tumour grading (Ki67 classiifcation) was technically possible only in a smaller cohort (n=143): grade 1, 50.3% (n=72); grade 2, 46.2% (n=66) and grade 3, 3.5% (n=5) (40 histopathological classification either not technically feasible or biopsy not perfomed). 60.1% (n=110) were localised, 14.2% (n=26) locally advanced and 23.5% (n=43) metastatic (4 missing). 224 68Ga-DOTA PET/CT scans were performed in total for: diagnosis/staging 40% (n=88), post-operative assessment/clinical surveillance 53% (n=117) and consideration of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) 8% (n=17) (2 missing). PET/CT results confirmed other imaging findings (53%), identified new disease sites (28.5%) and excluded suspected disease (5%). Overall, 68Ga-DOTA PET/CT imaging findings provided additional information in 119 (54%) patients and influenced management in 85 (39%) cases. CONCLUSION 68Ga-DOTA PET/CT imaging more accurately stages and guides treatment in patients with sporadic/familial panNETs with newly diagnosed/recurrent disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel J. Cuthbertson
- Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Liverpool, United Kingdom
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
- *Correspondence: Daniel J. Cuthbertson,
| | - Jorge Barriuso
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Angela Lamarca
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Prakash Manoharan
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust ENETS Centre of Excellence, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Thomas Westwood
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust ENETS Centre of Excellence, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Matthew Jaffa
- Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Stephen W. Fenwick
- Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Christina Nuttall
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Fiona Lalloo
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Saint Mary’s Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Andreas Prachalias
- Institute of Liver Studies, Kings College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Michail Pizanias
- Institute of Liver Studies, Kings College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Hulya Wieshmann
- Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Mairead G. McNamara
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Richard Hubner
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Raj Srirajaskanthan
- Neuroendocrine Tumour Unit, KHP ENETS Centre of Excellence, Institute of Liver Studies, Kings College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Gillian Vivian
- Neuroendocrine Tumour Unit, KHP ENETS Centre of Excellence, Institute of Liver Studies, Kings College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - John Ramage
- Neuroendocrine Tumour Unit, KHP ENETS Centre of Excellence, Institute of Liver Studies, Kings College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Martin O. Weickert
- The Arden Neuroendocrine Centre, ENETS Centre of Excellence, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry, United Kingdom
| | - D Mark Pritchard
- Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Liverpool, United Kingdom
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Sobhan Vinjamuri
- Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Juan Valle
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Vincent S. Yip
- Barts and the London HPB Centre, Royal London Hospital, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Pancreatobiliary Surgery, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Pilz MJ, Aaronson NK, Arraras JI, Caocci G, Efficace F, Groenvold M, Holzner B, van Leeuwen M, Loth FLC, Petersen MA, Ramage J, Tomaszewski KA, Young T, Giesinger JM. Evaluating the Thresholds for Clinical Importance of the EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL in Patients Receiving Palliative Treatment. J Palliat Med 2020; 24:397-404. [PMID: 32835601 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2020.0159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL is a shortened version of the widely used EORTC QLQ-C30. This questionnaire was developed to measure the symptoms and functional health of patients receiving palliative care. Objective: To enhance clinical interpretability of the EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL, our aim was to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of thresholds for clinical importance developed previously for the QLQ-C30 when applied to the QLQ-C15-PAL scales. Design: Cross-sectional observational study. Setting/Subjects: Patients with cancer receiving any type of palliative treatment. Measurement: Patients completed the EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL and anchor items on limitations, worries, and need for help for each of the health domains covered by the questionnaire. The anchor items were summarized in a binary criterion for clinical importance to calculate the sensitivity and specificity of the thresholds for clinical importance. Results: In total, 225 patients participated in the study (mean age 64.5 years). Patients were recruited from Austria, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, Spain, and the United Kingdom. The thresholds for clinical importance for the QLQ-C15-PAL scales showed a median sensitivity of 0.88 (range: 0.82 for sleep disturbances to 1.00 for dyspnea) and a median specificity of 0.74 (range: 0.54 for dyspnea to 0.89 for constipation). Conclusion: The thresholds for clinical importance showed high sensitivity and mostly high specificity in identifying clinically important symptoms and functional health impairments as assessed by the QLQ-C15-PAL. These thresholds will facilitate interpretation of EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL scores in daily clinical practice and clinical research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Micha J Pilz
- University Hospital of Psychiatry II, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Neil K Aaronson
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Juan I Arraras
- Oncology Departments, Complejo Hospitalario of Navarre, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Giovanni Caocci
- Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Fabio Efficace
- Health Outcomes Research Unit, Italian Group for Adult Hematologic Diseases (GIMEMA) Data Center, Rome, Italy
| | - Mogens Groenvold
- The Palliative Care Research Unit, Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine GP, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Bernhard Holzner
- University Hospital of Psychiatry II, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Marieke van Leeuwen
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Fanny L C Loth
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Simssee Clinic Bad Endorf, Bad Endorf, Germany
| | - Morten Aa Petersen
- The Palliative Care Research Unit, Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine GP, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - John Ramage
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Basingstoke, United Kingdom
| | - Krzysztof A Tomaszewski
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University, Krakow, Poland.,Scanmed St. Raphael Hospital, Krakow, Poland
| | - Teresa Young
- Lynda Jackson Macmillan Centre, East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust Incorporating Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, United Kingdom
| | - Johannes M Giesinger
- University Hospital of Psychiatry II, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Giesinger JM, Loth FL, Aaronson NK, Arraras JI, Caocci G, Efficace F, Groenvold M, van Leeuwen M, Petersen MA, Ramage J, Tomaszewski KA, Young T, Holzner B. Thresholds for clinical importance were defined for the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Computer Adaptive Testing Core—an adaptive measure of core quality of life domains in oncology clinical practice and research. J Clin Epidemiol 2020; 117:117-125. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.09.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2019] [Revised: 09/17/2019] [Accepted: 09/30/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
17
|
Hudgens S, Ramage J, Kulke M, Bergsland E, Anthony L, Caplin M, Öberg K, Pavel M, Gable J, Banks P, Yang QM, Lapuerta P. Evaluation of meaningful change in bowel movement frequency for patients with carcinoid syndrome. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2019; 3:64. [PMID: 31655936 PMCID: PMC6815313 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-019-0153-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2019] [Accepted: 09/25/2019] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Carcinoid syndrome is associated with a reduced quality of life that can be attributed to symptoms such as diarrhea and fatigue as well as social and financial issues. This study was conducted to psychometrically assess meaningful change in bowel movement frequency among carcinoid syndrome patients using data from the TELESTAR clinical study. Methods An anchor-based approach for deriving meaningful change thresholds consisted of mapping change from baseline bowel movement frequency to other patient-reported assessments of change. These included the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) Diarrhea Symptom responders, the EORTC Gastrointestinal NET questionnaire (GI.NET21) GI Symptom responders, and reported adequate relief at Week 12 (≥ 10-point score decrease from Day 1 to Week 12). Parameters included within-group mean change from baseline to Week 12, t-tests of the change (Wilcoxon rank sum for adequate relief), and effect size. Results There were 135 carcinoid syndrome patients with a mean baseline frequency of 5.7 bowel movements a day. A distribution-based method yielded meaningful change estimates of 0.62 bowel movements a day for overall frequency and 0.83 bowel movements a day at Week 12. Anchor-based analysis indicated a large effect size among patients who reported adequate relief at Week 12 (− 1.58; n = 18; P = 0.014), the QLQ-C30 Diarrhea domain responders (− 1.24; n = 40; P < 0.001), and the GI.NET21 GI Symptoms Domain responders (− 1.49; n = 25; P = 0.005). Exit interview data for meaningful change yielded effect size estimates of − 1.57 for overall change during the Double-blind Treatment Period and − 1.97 for change between Baseline and Week 12. Conclusions Meaningful change derivation is critical to interpret patient outcomes for evaluating treatment efficacy. In this study, carcinoid syndrome patients experienced clinically meaningful reductions in bowel movement frequency of ≥30% over 12 weeks with telotristat ethyl treatment. Trial registration NCT01677910.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stacie Hudgens
- CEO & Strategic Lead, Quantitative Science, Clinical Outcomes Solutions, 1790 E. River Rd, Suite 205, Tucson, AZ, 85718, USA.
| | - John Ramage
- Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Aldermaston Road, Basingstoke, Hampshire, RG24 9NA, UK
| | - Matthew Kulke
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Emily Bergsland
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1450 3rd St, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
| | - Lowell Anthony
- University of Kentucky, 410 Administration Dr, Lexington, KY, 40508, USA
| | - Martyn Caplin
- Royal Free Hospital, Pond St, Hampstead, London, NW3 2QG, UK
| | | | - Marianne Pavel
- Friedrich Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Schloßplatz 4, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Jonathon Gable
- CEO & Strategic Lead, Quantitative Science, Clinical Outcomes Solutions, 1790 E. River Rd, Suite 205, Tucson, AZ, 85718, USA
| | - Phillip Banks
- Lexicon Pharmaceuticals Inc., 8800 Technology Forest Pl, The Woodlands, TX, USA
| | - Qi Melissa Yang
- Lexicon Pharmaceuticals Inc., 8800 Technology Forest Pl, The Woodlands, TX, USA
| | - Pablo Lapuerta
- Lexicon Pharmaceuticals Inc., 8800 Technology Forest Pl, The Woodlands, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Giesinger JM, Loth FLC, Aaronson NK, Arraras JI, Caocci G, Efficace F, Groenvold M, van Leeuwen M, Petersen MA, Ramage J, Tomaszewski KA, Young T, Holzner B. Thresholds for clinical importance were established to improve interpretation of the EORTC QLQ-C30 in clinical practice and research. J Clin Epidemiol 2019; 118:1-8. [PMID: 31639445 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 157] [Impact Index Per Article: 31.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2019] [Revised: 10/04/2019] [Accepted: 10/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to establish thresholds for clinical importance (TCIs) for the five functioning and nine symptom scales of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING In this diagnostic study, cancer patients with mixed diagnoses and treatments completed the EORTC QLQ-C30 and anchored the questions in each domain in terms of their clinical importance. The anchor questions, concerned limitations in daily life, need for help/care, and the worries of the patient and his/her partner/family. These questions allowed categorizing patients into whether they exhibited a clinically important symptom/functional impairment for each scale and performing a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis to establish TCIs. RESULTS Data from 498 patients from six European countries (mean age 60.4 years, 55.2% women) were analyzed. For the TCIs generated using the patient questionnaire data, the EORTC QLQ-C30 scales showed sensitivity values between 0.71 and 0.97 and specificity values between 0.62 and 0.92 (area under the curve above 0.80 for all scales). CONCLUSION This EORTC Quality of Life Group study provides TCIs for the functioning and symptom scales of the EORTC QLQ-C30. These TCIs can increase the interpretability of the questionnaire results and foster its use in daily clinical practice and in clinical research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes M Giesinger
- University Hospital of Psychiatry II, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
| | - Fanny L C Loth
- University Hospital of Psychiatry II, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Neil K Aaronson
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Juan I Arraras
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital of Navarre, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Giovanni Caocci
- Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Fabio Efficace
- Health Outcomes Research Unit, Italian Group for Adult Hematologic Diseases (GIMEMA) Data Center, Rome, Italy
| | - Mogens Groenvold
- The Research Unit, Department of Palliative Medicine, Bispebjerg & Frederiksberg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Marieke van Leeuwen
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Morten Aa Petersen
- Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - John Ramage
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Aldermaston Road, Basingstoke, RG24 9NA, UK
| | - Krzysztof A Tomaszewski
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University, Krakow, Poland
| | - Teresa Young
- Lynda Jackson Macmillan Centre, East & North Hertfordshire NHS Trust incorporating Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK
| | - Bernhard Holzner
- University Hospital of Psychiatry II, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Bottoms L, Leighton D, Carpenter R, Anderson S, Langmead L, Ramage J, Faulkner J, Coleman E, Fairhurst C, Seed M, Tew G. Affective and enjoyment responses to 12 weeks of high intensity interval training and moderate continuous training in adults with Crohn's disease. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0222060. [PMID: 31539378 PMCID: PMC6754139 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2019] [Accepted: 08/20/2019] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
The aim was to undertake secondary data analysis from a three-arm randomised feasibility trial of high intensity interval training (HIIT), moderate intensity continuous training (MICT), and usual care control in adults with Crohn’s disease (CD; n = 36), with a primary focus on exploring affective and enjoyment responses. Twenty-five participants with quiescent or mildly-active CD were randomised to one of the two exercise groups: HIIT (n = 13) and MICT (n = 12). Both groups were offered thrice weekly sessions for 12 weeks. MICT consisted of cycling for 30 minutes at 35% peak power (Wpeak), whereas HIIT involved ten 1-minute bouts at 90% Wpeak, interspersed with 1-minute bouts at 15% Wpeak. Heart rate (HR), differentiated ratings of perceived exertion for legs (RPE-L) and central (RPE-C), along with feeling state (Feeling Scale; FS) were measured at 92.5% of each session. Enjoyment was measured at the end of training using the Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale (PACES). Post-hoc exploratory analysis involved a mixed-model two-way ANOVA to compare HR, RPE-L, RPE-C and FS for the exercise sessions in weeks 1, 6 and 12 between groups. Overall, HR was greater (p < 0.01) during HIIT (173 ± 8 bpm) compared with MICT (128 ± 6 bpm). Similarly, RPE-L and RPE-C responses were greater overall (p = 0.03 and p = 0.03, respectively) during HIIT (5.5 ± 1.6 and 5.1 ± 1.7, respectively) compared to MICT (3.3 ± 1.5 and 2.9 ± 1.5, respectively). Overall, FS was 2.2 ± 1.9 for HIIT and 2.1 ± 1.4 for MICT with no effect of treatment group (p = 0.25) or time (p = 0.94). There was also no significant difference in PACES scores between HIIT (99.4 ± 12.9) and MICT (101.3 ± 17.4; p = 0.78). The findings suggest HIIT and MICT protocols elicited similar enjoyment and affect in adults with quiescent or mildly-active CD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsay Bottoms
- Department of Psychology and Sports Science, University of Hertfordshire, Life and Medical Sciences, Hatfield, United Kingdom
- * E-mail:
| | - Dean Leighton
- Centre for Immunobiology, Queen Mary University of London, Whitechapel, London
| | - Roger Carpenter
- School of Health, Sport and Bioscience, University of East London, Stratford Campus, London, United Kingdom
| | - Simon Anderson
- Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Louise Langmead
- Digestive Diseases Clinical Academic Unit, Barts and the London NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - John Ramage
- Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hampshire, United Kingdom
| | - James Faulkner
- Department of Sport, Exercise and Health, University of Winchester, Winchester, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Michael Seed
- School of Health, Sport and Bioscience, University of East London, Stratford Campus, London, United Kingdom
| | - Garry Tew
- Department of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Northumbria University, Newcastle, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Tew GA, Leighton D, Carpenter R, Anderson S, Langmead L, Ramage J, Faulkner J, Coleman E, Fairhurst C, Seed M, Bottoms L. High-intensity Interval Training And Moderate-intensity Continuous Training In Adults With Crohn’S Disease: A Pilot Trial. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2019. [DOI: 10.1249/01.mss.0000560861.47673.f4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
21
|
Bottoms L, Leighton D, Carpenter R, Anderson S, Langmead L, Ramage J, Faulkner J, Coleman E, Fairhurst C, Seed M, Tew GA. Enjoyment Responses to High Intensity Interval and Moderate Intensity Continuous Training in Crohn’s Disease Patients. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2019. [DOI: 10.1249/01.mss.0000560860.47673.bd] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
22
|
Lamarca A, Palmer DH, Wasan HS, Ross PJ, Ma YT, Arora A, Falk S, Gillmore R, Wadsley J, Patel K, Anthoney A, Maraveyas A, Waters JS, Hobbs C, Barber S, Ryder D, Ramage J, Davies LM, Bridgewater JA, Valle JW. ABC-06 | A randomised phase III, multi-centre, open-label study of active symptom control (ASC) alone or ASC with oxaliplatin / 5-FU chemotherapy (ASC+mFOLFOX) for patients (pts) with locally advanced / metastatic biliary tract cancers (ABC) previously-treated with cisplatin/gemcitabine (CisGem) chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.4003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 143] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
4003 Background: Level A evidence supports use of CisGem as first-line chemotherapy for ABC; no robust evidence is available for second-line chemotherapy. Methods: Pts diagnosed with ABC with disease progression after prior CisGem were randomised (1:1) to either ASC+mFOLFOX or ASC. Randomisation was stratified by serum albumin levels ( < 35 vs ≥35 g/L), platinum sensitivity (determined from first-line CisGem) and disease extent (locally advanced vs metastatic). Pts with ECOG PS0-1, adequate haematological, renal and liver function, and adequate biliary drainage were eligible. Primary end-point was overall survival (OS) (multivariable Cox regression adjusted for stratification factors); sample size: 162 pts delivering 148 events were required (80% power; 5% two-sided alpha) for a hypothesised hazard ratio (HR) of 0.63. Assumed median survival for ASC was 4 months. Results: 162 pts (81 in each arm) were randomised (27 March ‘14 - 04 Jan ‘18); median age 65 yrs (range 26-84); sex: 80 (49%) male, 82 (51%) female; primary site: intrahepatic 72 (44%), extrahepatic 45 (28%), gallbladder 34 (21%) and ampullary 11 (7%). Baseline characteristics were balanced between arms except platinum sensitivity (ASC+mFOLFOX 27 pts (33%); ASC 34 pts (42%)). After 150 OS events, the adjusted HR was 0.69 (95% CI 0.50-0.97; p = 0.031; ASC+mFOLFOX vs ASC). Median OS (months (m)), 6m and 12m OS-rate (%) were 6.2m, 50.6% and 25.9% for the ASC+mFOLFOX and 5.3m, 35.5%, 11.4% for the ASC arm, respectively. Grade 3/4 toxicities were reported in 48 (59%) and 32 (39%) pts in the ASC+mFOLFOX and ASC arm, respectively; these were balanced between arms except for fatigue and neutropenia (more frequent in ASC+mFOLFOX arm); data cleaning is ongoing. No chemotherapy-related deaths were reported. Conclusion: Survival with ASC was greater than assumed; ASC+mFOLFOX improved OS after progression to CisGem with a clinically meaningful increase in 6m and 12m OS rate. ASC+mFOLFOX should become standard of care in second-line for ABC. Clinical trial information: NCT01926236.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Lamarca
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust / Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | - Yuk Ting Ma
- University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Arvind Arora
- University Hospital of Nottingham NHS Trust, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Stephen Falk
- Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | - Alan Anthoney
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | - Safia Barber
- University of Manchester Clinical Trials Unit, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - David Ryder
- University of Manchester Clinical Trials Unit, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - John Ramage
- Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Basingstoke, United Kingdom
| | - Linda M Davies
- University of Manchester Health Economics Department, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | | | - Juan W. Valle
- University of Manchester/The Christie, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Mujica-Mota R, Varley-Campbell J, Tikhonova I, Cooper C, Griffin E, Haasova M, Peters J, Lucherini S, Talens-Bou J, Long L, Sherriff D, Napier M, Ramage J, Hoyle M. Everolimus, lutetium-177 DOTATATE and sunitinib for advanced, unresectable or metastatic neuroendocrine tumours with disease progression: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis. Health Technol Assess 2019; 22:1-326. [PMID: 30209002 DOI: 10.3310/hta22490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) are a group of heterogeneous cancers that develop in cells in the diffuse neuroendocrine system. OBJECTIVES To estimate the clinical effectiveness of three interventions [everolimus (Afinitor®; Novartis International AG, Basel, Switzerland), lutetium-177 DOTATATE (177Lu-DOTATATE) (Lutathera®; Imaging Equipment Ltd, Radstock, UK) and sunitinib (Sutent®; Pfizer Inc., New York, NY, USA)] for treating unresectable or metastatic NETs with disease progression and establish the cost-effectiveness of these interventions. DATA SOURCES The following databases were searched from inception to May 2016: MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, MEDLINE Daily, Epub Ahead of Print, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Web of Science. REVIEW METHODS We systematically reviewed the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness literature on everolimus, 177Lu-DOTATATE and sunitinib for treating advanced, unresectable or metastatic progressive NETs. The following NET locations were considered separately: pancreas, gastrointestinal (GI) tract and lung, and GI tract (midgut only). We wrote a survival partition cohort-based economic evaluation in Microsoft Excel® 2013 (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA) from the UK NHS and Personal Social Services perspective. This comprised three health states: (1) progression-free survival (PFS), (2) progressed disease and (3) death. RESULTS Three randomised controlled trials (RCTs), RADIANT-3 [RAD001 in Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors, Third Trial; pancreatic NETs (pNETs): everolimus vs. best supportive care (BSC)], A6181111 (pNETs: sunitinib vs. BSC) and RADIANT-4 (RAD001 in Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors, Fourth Trial; GI and lung NETs: everolimus vs. BSC), met the inclusion criteria for the clinical effectiveness systematic review. The risk of bias was low. Although the NETTER-1 (Neuroendocrine Tumors Therapy) RCT, of 177Lu-DOTATATE plus 30 mg of octreotide (Sandostatin®, Novartis) compared with 60 mg of octreotide, was excluded from the review, we nonetheless present the results of this trial, as it informs our estimate of the cost-effectiveness of 177Lu-DOTATATE. The pNETs trials consistently found that the interventions improved PFS and overall survival (OS) compared with BSC. Our indirect comparison found no significant difference in PFS between everolimus and sunitinib. Estimates of OS gain were confounded because of high rates of treatment switching. After adjustment, our indirect comparison suggested a lower, but non-significant, hazard of death for sunitinib compared with everolimus. In GI and lung NETs, everolimus significantly improved PFS compared with BSC and showed a non-significant trend towards improved OS compared with BSC. Adverse events were more commonly reported following treatment with targeted interventions than after treatment with BSC. In the base case for pNETs, assuming list prices, we estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for everolimus compared with BSC of £45,493 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) and for sunitinib compared with BSC of £20,717 per QALY. These ICERs increased substantially without the adjustment for treatment switching. For GI and lung NETs, we estimated an ICER for everolimus compared with BSC of £44,557 per QALY. For GI (midgut) NETs, the ICERs were £199,233 per QALY for everolimus compared with BSC and £62,158 per QALY for a scenario analysis comparing 177Lu-DOTATATE with BSC. We judge that no treatment meets the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence's (NICE) end-of-life criteria, although we cannot rule out that sunitinib in the A6181111 trial does. LIMITATIONS A RCT with included comparators was not identified for 177Lu-DOTATATE. The indirect treatment comparison that our economic analysis was based on was of a simple Bucher type, unadjusted for any differences in the baseline characteristics across the two trials. CONCLUSIONS Given NICE's current stated range of £20,000-30,000 per QALY for the cost-effectiveness threshold, based on list prices, only sunitinib might be considered good value for money in England and Wales. FUTURE WORK Further analysis of individual patient data from RADIANT-3 would allow assessment of the robustness of our findings. The data were not made available to us by the company sponsoring the trial. STUDY REGISTRATION This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42016041303. FUNDING The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruben Mujica-Mota
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Jo Varley-Campbell
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Irina Tikhonova
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Chris Cooper
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Ed Griffin
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Marcela Haasova
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Jaime Peters
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Stefano Lucherini
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Juan Talens-Bou
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Linda Long
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - David Sherriff
- Plymouth Oncology Centre, Plymouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK
| | - Mark Napier
- Exeter Oncology Centre, Royal Devon & Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| | - John Ramage
- Neuroendocrine Tumour Service, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Martin Hoyle
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Tew GA, Leighton D, Carpenter R, Anderson S, Langmead L, Ramage J, Faulkner J, Coleman E, Fairhurst C, Seed M, Bottoms L. High-intensity interval training and moderate-intensity continuous training in adults with Crohn's disease: a pilot randomised controlled trial. BMC Gastroenterol 2019; 19:19. [PMID: 30696423 PMCID: PMC6352351 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-019-0936-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2018] [Accepted: 01/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study assessed the feasibility and acceptability of two common types of exercise training-high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT)-in adults with Crohn's disease (CD). METHODS In this mixed-methods pilot trial, participants with quiescent or mildly-active CD were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to HIIT, MICT or usual care control, and followed up for 6 months. The HIIT and MICT groups were offered three exercise sessions per week for the first 12 weeks. Feasibility outcomes included rates of recruitment, retention, outcome completion, and exercise attendance. Data were collected on cardiorespiratory fitness (e.g., peak oxygen uptake), disease activity, fatigue, quality of life, adverse events, and intervention acceptability (via interviews). RESULTS Over 17 months, 53 patients were assessed for eligibility and 36 (68%) were randomised (47% male; mean age 36.9 [SD 11.2] years); 13 to HIIT, 12 to MICT, and 11 to control. The exercise session attendance rate was 62% for HIIT (288/465) and 75% for MICT (320/429), with 62% of HIIT participants (8/13) and 67% of MICT participants (8/12) completing at least 24 of 36 sessions. One participant was lost to follow-up. Outcome completion rates ranged from 89 to 97%. The mean increase in peak oxygen uptake, relative to control, was greater following HIIT than MICT (2.4 vs. 0.7 mL/kg/min). There were three non-serious exercise-related adverse events, and two exercise participants experienced disease relapse during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS The findings support the feasibility and acceptability of the exercise programmes and trial procedures. A definitive trial is warranted. Physical exercise remains a potentially useful adjunct therapy in CD. [ID: ISRCTN13021107].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Garry A. Tew
- Department of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Northumbria University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, NE1 8ST UK
| | - Dean Leighton
- Centre for Immunobiology, Queen Mary University of London, Blizard Building, Newark Street, Whitechapel, London, E1 2AT UK
| | - Roger Carpenter
- School of Health, Sport and Bioscience, University of East London, Stratford Campus, London, E15 4LZ UK
| | | | - Louise Langmead
- Digestive Diseases Clinical Academic Unit, Barts and the London NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - John Ramage
- Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hampshire, UK
| | - James Faulkner
- Department of Sport, Exercise and Health, University of Winchester, Winchester, SO22 4NR UK
| | | | | | - Michael Seed
- School of Health, Sport and Bioscience, University of East London, Stratford Campus, London, E15 4LZ UK
| | - Lindsay Bottoms
- Centre for Psychology and Sports Science, University of Hertfordshire, Life and Medical Sciences, CP Snow Building, College Lane, Hatfield, AL10 9AB UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Cella D, Beaumont JL, Hudgens S, Marteau F, Feuilly M, Houchard A, Lapuerta P, Ramage J, Pavel M, Hörsch D, Kulke MH. Relationship Between Symptoms and Health-related Quality-of-life Benefits in Patients With Carcinoid Syndrome: Post Hoc Analyses From TELESTAR. Clin Ther 2018; 40:2006-2020.e2. [PMID: 30477789 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2018.10.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2018] [Revised: 09/12/2018] [Accepted: 10/09/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors and carcinoid syndrome (CS) may experience chronic, recurring symptoms despite somatostatin analogue therapy. Little is known about the relationship between bowel movement (BM) frequency, patient-reported symptoms and health-related quality of life (QoL). Data from the TELESTAR study were used in exploratory, post hoc analyses to understand the relationship between durable reductions in BM frequency, symptom relief, and health-related QoL. METHODS Patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors and CS in the Phase III TELESTAR study were randomized (1:1:1) to receive telotristat ethyl (TE) 250 mg, TE 500 mg, or placebo three times daily (TID) during a 12-week double-blind treatment period (DBTP). All patients received TE 500 mg TID in an open-label extension (OLE) to Week 48. Durable response was predefined. Analyses compared durable responders (DRs) and non-durable responders (NDRs), irrespective of treatment group, at Weeks 12, 24, and 48. FINDINGS At the start of the DBTP, 135 patients were randomized, 45 patients each to TE 250 mg, TE 500 mg, and placebo. After the 12-week DBTP, 48 of 135 patients were DRs (TE 250 mg, n = 20; TE 500 mg, n = 19; placebo, n = 9). Of the 115 patients who entered the OLE, 35 were DRs initially randomized to TE 250 mg (n = 18) or 500 mg (n = 17), 29 of whom maintained a durable response throughout the OLE. Of the 71 DBTP-NDRs (inclusive of patients initially randomized to placebo), 28 became OLE-DRs. There were 29 NDRs initially randomized to placebo who entered the OLE, 16 of whom became DRs when switched to TE 500 mg. DRs during the DBTP had greater symptom improvements in the DBTP; these improvements continued over the OLE. DBTP-DRs also maintained more meaningful QoL improvements in EORTC QLQ-C30 global health status, nausea and vomiting, pain, diarrhea, and EORTC QLQ-GINET21 gastrointestinal symptoms over the DBTP and OLE periods than DBTP-NDRs. IMPLICATIONS These results suggest that sustained improvements in BM frequency in patients with CS may have multifaceted, long-term effects on a patient's well-being. ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT01677910.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Cella
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
| | - Jennifer L Beaumont
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA; Terasaki Research Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - John Ramage
- Hampshire Hospitals, Basingstoke, United Kingdom
| | - Marianne Pavel
- Universitatsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Bloom K, Sudarsanam S, Hwang H, Racke F, Astrow S, Moran M, Chioda M, Sheng J, Ramage J, Mardekian J, Iafrate A. P3.13-03 Real-World Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Testing Practices: Results from a Survey in the United States. J Thorac Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2018.08.1843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
27
|
Ramage J, Naraev BG, Halfdanarson TR. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy for patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Semin Oncol 2018; 45:236-248. [DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2018.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2018] [Accepted: 08/22/2018] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
|
28
|
Pereira SP, Jitlal M, Duggan M, Lawrie E, Beare S, O'Donoghue P, Wasan HS, Valle JW, Bridgewater J, Ramage J, Przemioslo R, Hammonds R, Aithal G, Murphy F, Foster G, Sturgess R. PHOTOSTENT-02: porfimer sodium photodynamic therapy plus stenting versus stenting alone in patients with locally advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancer. ESMO Open 2018; 3:e000379. [PMID: 30094069 PMCID: PMC6069917 DOI: 10.1136/esmoopen-2018-000379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2018] [Revised: 06/06/2018] [Accepted: 06/07/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Endobiliary stenting is standard practice for palliation of obstructive jaundice due to biliary tract cancer (BTC). Photodynamic therapy (PDT) may also improve biliary drainage and previous small studies suggested survival benefit. Aims To assess the difference in outcome between patients with BTC undergoing palliative stenting plus PDT versus stenting alone. Methods 92 patients with confirmed locally advanced or metastatic BTC, ECOG performance status 0-3 and adequate biliary drainage were randomised (46 per group) to receive porfimer sodium PDT plus stenting or stenting alone. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Toxicity and progression-free survival (PFS) were secondary end points. Treatment arms were well balanced for baseline factors and prior therapy. Results No significant differences in grade 3-4 toxicities and no grade 3-4 adverse events due to PDT were observed. Thirteen (28%) PDT patients and 24 (52%) stent alone patients received subsequent palliative chemotherapy. After a median follow-up of 8.4 months, OS and PFS were worse in patients receiving PDT compared with stent alone group (OS median 6.2 vs 9.8 months (HR 1.56, 95% CI 1.00 to 2.43, p=0.048) and PFS median 3.4 vs 4.3 months (HR 1.43, 95% CI: 0.93 to 2.18, p=0.10), respectively). Conclusion In patients with locally advanced or metastatic BTC, PDT was associated with worse outcome than stenting alone, explained only in part by the differences in chemotherapy treatments. We conclude that optimal stenting remains the treatment of choice for malignant biliary obstruction and the use of PDT for this indication cannot be recommended outside of clinical trials. Trial registration number ISRCTN 87712758; EudraCT 2005-001173-96; UKCRN ID: 1461.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen P Pereira
- The UCL Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, University College London, London, UK; Department of Gastroenterology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| | - Mark Jitlal
- Cancer Research UK and University College London Cancer Trials Centre, London, UK
| | - Marian Duggan
- Cancer Research UK and University College London Cancer Trials Centre, London, UK
| | - Emma Lawrie
- Cancer Research UK and University College London Cancer Trials Centre, London, UK
| | - Sandy Beare
- Cancer Research UK and University College London Cancer Trials Centre, London, UK
| | | | - Harpreet S Wasan
- Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College Health Care Trust, London, UK
| | - Juan W Valle
- Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, The Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
van Leeuwen M, Husson O, Alberti P, Arraras JI, Chinot OL, Costantini A, Darlington AS, Dirven L, Eichler M, Hammerlid EB, Holzner B, Johnson CD, Kontogianni M, Kjær TK, Morag O, Nolte S, Nordin A, Pace A, Pinto M, Polz K, Ramage J, Reijneveld JC, Serpentini S, Tomaszewski KA, Vassiliou V, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM, Vistad I, Young TE, Aaronson NK, van de Poll-Franse LV. Understanding the quality of life (QOL) issues in survivors of cancer: towards the development of an EORTC QOL cancer survivorship questionnaire. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2018; 16:114. [PMID: 29866185 PMCID: PMC5987570 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-018-0920-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 108] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2017] [Accepted: 04/30/2018] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKROUND The number of cancer survivors is growing steadily and increasingly, clinical trials are being designed to include long-term follow-up to assess not only survival, but also late effects and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Therefore it is is essential to develop patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) that capture the full range of issues relevant to disease-free cancer survivors. The objectives of this project are: 1) to develop a European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) questionnaire that captures the full range of physical, mental and social HRQOL issues relevant to disease-free cancer survivors; and 2) to determine at which minimal time since completion of treatment the questionnaire should be used. METHODS We reviewed 134 publications on cancer survivorship and interviewed 117 disease-free cancer survivors with 11 different types of cancer across 14 countries in Europe to generate an exhaustive, provisional list of HRQOL issues relevant to cancer survivors. The resulting issue list, the EORTC core questionnaire (QLQ-C30), and site-specific questionnaire modules were completed by a second group of 458 survivors. RESULTS We identified 116 generic survivorship issues. These issues covered body image, cognitive functioning, health behaviors, negative and positive outlook, health distress, mental health, fatigue, sleep problems, physical functioning, pain, several physical symptoms, social functioning, and sexual problems. Patients rated most of the acute symptoms of cancer and its treatment (e.g. nausea) as no longer relevant approximately one year after completion of treatment. CONCLUSIONS Compared to existing cancer survivorship questionnaires, our findings underscore the relevance of assessing issues related to chronic physical side effects of treatment such as neuropathy and joint pain. We will further develop a core survivorship questionnaire and three site-specific modules for disease-free adult cancer survivors who are at least one year post-treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marieke van Leeuwen
- Division of Psychosocial Research & Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Olga Husson
- Department of Medical Psychology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Paola Alberti
- Experimental Neurology Unit, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
- Milan Center for Neuroscience, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Olivier L Chinot
- Pôle Neurosciences Cliniques, Service de Neuro-Oncologie, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France
| | - Anna Costantini
- Departmental Psychoncology Unit, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Linda Dirven
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Neurology, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, the Netherlands
| | - Martin Eichler
- Division of Epidemiology and Health Services Research at Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), Mainz, Germany
| | - Eva B Hammerlid
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden
| | - Bernhard Holzner
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotheraphy, Division of Psychooncology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Colin D Johnson
- University Surgical Unit, University Hospitals Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Meropi Kontogianni
- Department of Nutrition & Dietetics, School of Health Sciences and Education, Harokopio University, Athens, Greece
| | - Trille Kristina Kjær
- Unit of Survivorship Research, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ofir Morag
- Oncology Institute, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel
| | - Sandra Nolte
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine Center for Internal Medicine and Dermatology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Andrew Nordin
- East Kent Gynaecological Oncology Centre, Margate, UK
| | - Andrea Pace
- Neuroncology Unit, National Cancer Institute Regina Elena, Rome, Italy
| | - Monica Pinto
- Rehabilitation Unit, Department of Supportive Care, Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS- Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Katja Polz
- Evangelische Kliniken Gelsenkirchen, Gelsenkirchen, Germany
| | - John Ramage
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Basingstoke, UK
| | - Jaap C Reijneveld
- Department of Neurology and Brain Tumor Center Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Samantha Serpentini
- Unit of Psychoncology - Breast Unit, Istituto Oncologico Veneto (IOV)-IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Krzysztof A Tomaszewski
- Health Outcomes Research Unit, Department of Geriatrics, Gerontology, and Social Work, Faculty of Education, Ignatianum Academy, Krakow, Poland
| | - Vassilios Vassiliou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Bank of Cyprus Oncology Centre, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Irma M Verdonck-de Leeuw
- Department of Otolaryngology / Head & Neck Surgery, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ingvild Vistad
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Sorlandet Hospital Kristiansand, Kristiansand, Norway
| | - Teresa E Young
- Lynda Jackson Macmillan Centre, East & North Hertfordshire NHS Trust including Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK
| | - Neil K Aaronson
- Division of Psychosocial Research & Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lonneke V van de Poll-Franse
- Division of Psychosocial Research & Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Comprehensive Cancer Centre South (CCCS), Eindhoven Cancer Registry, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
- Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Brédart A, Anota A, Young T, Tomaszewski KA, Arraras JI, Moura De Albuquerque Melo H, Schmidt H, Friend E, Bergenmar M, Costantini A, Vassiliou V, Hureaux J, Marchal F, Tomaszewska IM, Chie WC, Ramage J, Beaudeau A, Conroy T, Bleiker E, Kulis D, Bonnetain F, Aaronson NK. Phase III study of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer satisfaction with cancer care core questionnaire (EORTC PATSAT-C33) and specific complementary outpatient module (EORTC OUT-PATSAT7). Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2017; 27. [PMID: 29094784 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.12786] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/20/2017] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Advances in cancer care delivery require revision and further development of questionnaires assessing patients' perceived quality of care. This study pre-tested the revised EORTC satisfaction with cancer care core questionnaire applicable in both the cancer inpatient and outpatient settings, and its new, outpatient-specific complementary module. The process of revision, development of the extended application, and pre-testing of these questionnaires was based on phases I to III of the "EORTC Quality of Life Group Module Development Guidelines." In phase III, patients in 11 countries in four European regions, South America and Asia completed provisional versions of the questionnaires. Fifty-seven relevant issues selected from literature reviews and input from experts were operationalized into provisional items, and subsequently translated into ten languages. Assessment of understanding, acceptability, redundancy and relevance by patients (n = 151) from oncology inpatient wards, and outpatient chemotherapy, radiotherapy and consultation settings, led to retention of, deletion of and merging of 40, 14 and 6 items respectively. Cronbach's alpha coefficients for hypothesized questionnaire scales were above 0.80. Our results provide preliminary support for the 33-item EORTC Satisfaction with cancer care core questionnaire and the 7-item complementary module specific for the outpatient care setting. A large scale phase IV cross-cultural psychometric study is now underway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Brédart
- Institut Curie, Psycho-Oncology Unit, Paris, France.,University Paris Descartes, Boulogne Billancourt, France.,Quality of Life and Cancer Clinical Research Platform, CHU Besançon, France
| | - A Anota
- Methodology and Quality of Life in Oncology unit (INSERM UMR 1098), Quality of Life and Cancer Clinical Research Platform, CHU Besançon, France
| | - T Young
- Lynda Jackson Macmillan Centre, East& North Hertfordshire NHS Trust including Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, London, UK
| | - K A Tomaszewski
- Health Outcomes Research Unit, Department of Gerontology, Geriatrics and Social Work, Faculty of Education, Ignatianum Academy, Krakow, Poland
| | - J I Arraras
- Departments of Oncology, Complejo Hospitalario of Navarre, Pamplona, Spain
| | | | - H Schmidt
- Institute for Health and Nursing Science, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Germany
| | - E Friend
- Basingstoke & North Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke, UK
| | - M Bergenmar
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Center for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - A Costantini
- Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Psychoncology Unit, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - V Vassiliou
- Bank of Cyprus Oncology Centre, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - J Hureaux
- CHU Angers, Pulmonology Department and Angers University, Angers, France
| | - F Marchal
- Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Surgery Department, CRAN, UMR 7039, Université de Lorraine, CNRS, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - I M Tomaszewska
- Department of Medical Education, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
| | - W-C Chie
- Institute of Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - J Ramage
- Basingstoke & North Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke, UK
| | - A Beaudeau
- Institut Curie, Psycho-Oncology Unit, Paris, France.,University Paris Descartes, Boulogne Billancourt, France.,Quality of Life and Cancer Clinical Research Platform, CHU Besançon, France
| | - T Conroy
- Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Medical Oncology Department and EA 4360, Lorraine University, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - E Bleiker
- Division of Psychosocial Research & Epidemiology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - D Kulis
- EORTC Quality of Life Department, Brussels, Belgium
| | - F Bonnetain
- Methodology and Quality of Life in Oncology unit (INSERM UMR 1098), Quality of Life and Cancer Clinical Research Platform, CHU Besançon, France
| | - N K Aaronson
- Division of Psychosocial Research & Epidemiology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Anthony L, Ervin C, Lapuerta P, Kulke MH, Kunz P, Bergsland E, Hörsch D, Metz DC, Pasieka J, Pavlakis N, Pavel M, Caplin M, Öberg K, Ramage J, Evans E, Yang QM, Jackson S, Arnold K, Law L, DiBenedetti DB. Understanding the Patient Experience with Carcinoid Syndrome: Exit Interviews from a Randomized, Placebo-controlled Study of Telotristat Ethyl. Clin Ther 2017; 39:2158-2168. [PMID: 29074312 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.09.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2017] [Revised: 09/20/2017] [Accepted: 09/22/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Telotristat ethyl, an oral tryptophan hydroxylase inhibitor, is intended to treat carcinoid syndrome by reducing serotonin production. Telotristat ethyl was evaluated in TELESTAR, a Phase III study for patients who had carcinoid syndrome with at least 4 bowel movements (BMs) per day and who were receiving somatostatin analogue therapy. This interview substudy was conducted to provide insight into the patient experience in TELESTAR and to help understand whether reductions in BM frequency (the primary end point) and other symptoms were clinically meaningful. METHODS Participating sites were asked to invite (before randomization) all eligible patients to telephone interviews scheduled at the end of the double-blind treatment period. Patients and interviewers were blinded to treatment. FINDINGS All 35 interviewed participants reported diarrhea and/or excessive BMs at baseline. Patients reported that these symptoms negatively affected emotional, social, physical, and occupational well-being. Prespecified criteria for treatment response (achieving ≥30% reduction in BM frequency for at least 50% of the days) were met by 8 of 26 patients taking telotristat ethyl and 1 of 9 patients taking placebo. All 8 patients taking telotristat ethyl described clinically meaningful reductions in BM frequency and were very satisfied with the ability of the study drug to control their carcinoid syndrome symptoms. Overall, reports of being very satisfied were observed in 12 patients taking telotristat ethyl and 0 taking placebo. IMPLICATIONS Patient interviews revealed that TELESTAR patients, at baseline, were significantly affected by their high BM frequency. Patient reports of their clinical trial experience supported the significance of the primary end point and clinical responder analysis in TELESTAR, helping identify and understand clinically meaningful change produced by telotristat ethyl.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lowell Anthony
- Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
| | - Claire Ervin
- RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
| | | | | | - Pamela Kunz
- Stanford Cancer Center, Standford, California
| | - Emily Bergsland
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, California
| | - Dieter Hörsch
- Zentralklinik Bad Berka GmbH, Klinik fur Innerre, Medizin/Gastroenterologie und Endokrinologie, Bad Berka, Germany
| | - David C Metz
- University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Nick Pavlakis
- Royal North Shore Hospital, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | | | | | - John Ramage
- Hampshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke-Hampshire, United Kingdom
| | - Emily Evans
- RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
| | | | | | - Karie Arnold
- Lexicon Pharmaceuticals Inc, The Woodlands, Texas
| | - Linda Law
- Lexicon Pharmaceuticals Inc, The Woodlands, Texas
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Giesinger JM, Aaronson NK, Arraras JI, Efficace F, Groenvold M, Kieffer JM, Loth FL, Petersen MA, Ramage J, Tomaszewski KA, Young T, Holzner B. A cross-cultural convergent parallel mixed methods study of what makes a cancer-related symptom or functional health problem clinically important. Psychooncology 2017; 27:548-555. [DOI: 10.1002/pon.4548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2017] [Revised: 07/28/2017] [Accepted: 08/24/2017] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes M. Giesinger
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics; Medical University of Innsbruck; Innsbruck Austria
| | - Neil K. Aaronson
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology; The Netherlands Cancer Institute; Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Juan I. Arraras
- Medical Oncology Department; Hospital of Navarre; Pamplona Spain
| | - Fabio Efficace
- Health Outcomes Research Unit; Italian Group for Adult Hematologic Diseases (GIMEMA) Data Center; Rome Italy
| | - Mogens Groenvold
- The Research Unit, Department of Palliative Medicine, Bispebjerg Hospital, and Department of Public Health; University of Copenhagen; Copenhagen Denmark
| | - Jacobien M. Kieffer
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology; The Netherlands Cancer Institute; Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Fanny L. Loth
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics; Medical University of Innsbruck; Innsbruck Austria
| | - Morten Aa. Petersen
- The Research Unit, Department of Palliative Medicine, Bispebjerg Hospital, and Department of Public Health; University of Copenhagen; Copenhagen Denmark
| | - John Ramage
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology; Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust; Basingstoke UK
| | - Krzysztof A. Tomaszewski
- Health Outcomes Research Unit, Department of Gerontology, Geriatrics, and Social Work; Ignatianum Academy; Krakow Poland
| | - Teresa Young
- Lynda Jackson Macmillan Centre; Mount Vernon Cancer Centre; Northwood UK
| | - Bernhard Holzner
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics; Medical University of Innsbruck; Innsbruck Austria
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Anota A, Brédart A, Young T, Tomaszewski K, Arraras J, Moura De Albuquerque Melo H, Friend L, Schmidt H, Bergenmar M, Costantini A, Vassiliou V, Hureaux J, Marchal F, Tomaszewska I, Chie W, Conroy T, Ramage J, Beaudeau A, Bonnetain F, Kulis D, Aaronson N. Développement et validation préliminaire du questionnaire EORTC mesurant la satisfaction des soins des patients en cancérologie. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.respe.2017.03.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
|
34
|
Hicks RJ, Kwekkeboom DJ, Krenning E, Bodei L, Grozinsky-Glasberg S, Arnold R, Borbath I, Cwikla J, Toumpanakis C, Kaltsas G, Davies P, Hörsch D, Tiensuu Janson E, Ramage J. ENETS Consensus Guidelines for the Standards of Care in Neuroendocrine Neoplasia: Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy with Radiolabeled Somatostatin Analogues. Neuroendocrinology 2017; 105:295-309. [PMID: 28402980 DOI: 10.1159/000475526] [Citation(s) in RCA: 191] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2016] [Accepted: 04/06/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
The purpose of these guidelines is to assist physicians caring for patients with neuroendocrine neoplasia in considering eligibility criteria for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) and in defining the minimum requirements for PRRT. It is not these guidelines' aim to give recommendations on the use of specific radiolabelled somatostatin analogues for PRRT as different analogues are being used, and their availability is governed by varying international regulations. However, a recent randomized controlled trial, NETTER-1, has provided evidence that may establish <sup>177</sup>Lu-DOTA-octreotate (LutaThera®) as the first widely approved agent. It also makes recommendations on what minimal patient, tumour, and treatment outcome characteristics should be reported for PRRT to facilitate robust comparisons between studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rodney J Hicks
- Cancer Imaging and Neuroendocrine Service, the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Topping M, Gray D, Friend E, Davies A, Ramage J. A Systematic Review of Symptoms and Quality of Life Issues in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumours. Neuroendocrinology 2017; 105:320-330. [PMID: 28423380 DOI: 10.1159/000475793] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2017] [Accepted: 04/13/2017] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
<b><i>Purpose:</i></b> Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (pNETs) are rare neoplasms, in that they may only present symptoms of the hormone secreted, without any generic cancer issues. It is thus important to measure quality of life (QoL) in these patients by evaluating issues relevant and important to them, as opposed to general cancer issues. This paper systematically reviews papers addressing the symptoms and QoL implications of pNETs, and evaluates each subtype separately, with the aim to create a list of QoL issues relevant to these patient groups. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycInfo, Web of Science, Scopus, OpenGrey, and the Cochrane Library were searched for publications (1990-2016) reporting symptoms and QoL issues in pNETs. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Following screening of 2,797 papers, 69 articles were eligible for data extraction. From these papers, 84 different symptoms or QoL issues were extracted: 21 for gastrinoma, 18 for glucagonoma, 50 for insulinoma, 10 for VIPoma and 15 for non-functioning pNETs. No issues were reported for somatostatinoma, PPoma or ACTHoma. The most frequently reported symptoms vary by subtype. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> This review emphasises the need to develop a QoL measure for pNETs with specific items relevant to the different subtypes, due to the distinct symptoms reported. Following from this review, patient and healthcare professional interviews will be conducted in large cohorts across many different countries to collect more data on QoL issues specific to pNETs. This data will all be collated with the aim to create a QoL measure for pNETs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan Topping
- Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Basingstoke, UK
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Silaschi M, Barr J, Chaubey S, Nicou N, Srirajaskanthan R, Byrne J, Ramage J, MacCarthy P, Wendler O. Optimized Outcomes Using a Standardized Approach for the Treatment of Patients with Carcinoid Heart Disease. Neuroendocrinology 2017; 104:257-263. [PMID: 27097025 DOI: 10.1159/000446213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2016] [Accepted: 04/12/2016] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Carcinoid heart disease (CHD) is common in patients with carcinoid syndrome (CS). Surgical treatment improves the poor prognosis of CHD, although the reported peri-operative mortality is high (∼17%). We attempted to improve outcomes by implementation of a protocol for the management of patients with CHD at a UK Neuroendocrine Centre of Excellence and report our experience. METHODS All patients treated for CHD between 2008 and 2015 were included. Peri-operative treatment included surgical features such as invasive pulmonary valve (PV) inspection and preservation of the tricuspid subvalvular apparatus. RESULTS A total of 11 patients were treated; the median age was 63 years (IQR: 56-70). Ten patients underwent both pulmonary valve replacement (PVR) and tricuspid valve replacement (TVR); 1 patient underwent isolated TVR. One patient had additional aortic valve replacement (AVR), another one coronary artery bypass grafting. Bioprostheses (BP) were used in all patients, stented for TVR and AVR, stentless for PVR. Invasive PV inspection caused unplanned PVR in 3 cases (27.3%). All patients were discharged home. One patient (9.1%), who had had previous TVR by another surgeon, had right heart failure (RHF) during follow-up. One death occurred due to progression of CS (day 346). The carcinoids' primary was resected in 5 patients (45.5%) 10 months (4.5-19.5) after cardiac surgery. CONCLUSION Excellent results were achieved in patients with CHD. PV stenosis can be underestimated by echocardiography; therefore, intraoperative inspection is recommended. Right ventricular geometry should be respected to prevent RHF. BP should be used, as these patients are likely to undergo future non-cardiac surgeries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam Silaschi
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, King's College Hospital, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Abdulrahman B, Ahmed MH, Ramage J. Acute Liver Failure in a Patient Travelling From Asia: The Other Face of the Coin of Infectious Disease. Gastroenterology Res 2017; 10:268-270. [PMID: 28912916 PMCID: PMC5593449 DOI: 10.14740/gr856w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2017] [Accepted: 06/12/2017] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
We present a case of a 63-year-old male who had travelled from South India to United Kingdom (UK) visiting relatives. He had developed episodes of diarrhea, vomiting and fevers while travelling and on assessment in hospital, mild abdominal distension was noted with rapid deterioration to hypovolemic shock. Initial blood test showed a low platelet count with deranged liver function tests (LFTs). It was noted that during admission to intensive care unit (ICU), blood continued to ooze from a previous surgical laparoscopy wound, central and arterial line access sites. Blood results revealed ongoing derangement of clotting and LFT. Computed tomography (CT) scan showed possible acute cholecystitis and a laparoscopy showed an ischemic-looking liver and gut but no significant gallbladder abnormality. The virology screen was positive for dengue virus antibodies IgM and IgG. The patient developed multi-organ failure and deteriorated despite intensive support. Post mortem showed fulminant hepatic failure and acute tubular necrosis of kidneys.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Balen Abdulrahman
- Department of Cardiology, Milton Keynes University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Eaglestone, Milton Keynes, Buckinghamshire, UK
| | - Mohamed H. Ahmed
- Department of Medicine and HIV Metabolic Clinic, Milton Keynes University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Eaglestone, Milton Keynes, Buckinghamshire, UK
- Corresponding Author: Mohamed H. Ahmed, Department of Medicine and HIV Metabolic Clinic, Milton Keynes University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Eaglestone, Milton Keynes, Buckinghamshire, UK.
| | - John Ramage
- Liver Unit in Kings College Hospital, London, UK
- Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke, UK
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Partelli S, Bartsch DK, Capdevila J, Chen J, Knigge U, Niederle B, Nieveen van Dijkum EJM, Pape UF, Pascher A, Ramage J, Reed N, Ruszniewski P, Scoazec JY, Toumpanakis C, Kianmanesh R, Falconi M. ENETS Consensus Guidelines for Standard of Care in Neuroendocrine Tumours: Surgery for Small Intestinal and Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumours. Neuroendocrinology 2017; 105:255-265. [PMID: 28237989 DOI: 10.1159/000464292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 182] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2016] [Accepted: 02/19/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
The small intestine and pancreas are among the most frequent abdominal sites of origin of neuroendocrine tumours. Distinctive features of these forms are represented by the relatively low incidence and the wide heterogeneity in biological behaviour. In this light, it is difficult to standardize indications for surgery and the most appropriate approach. It would be helpful for surgeons managing patients with these tumours to have guidelines for surgical treatment of small intestinal neuroendocrine tumours and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. The proposed guidelines represent a consensus of the working group of the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Partelli
- Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, "Vita-Salute" University, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Ramage J, Punia P, Faluyi O, Frilling A, Meyer T, Kapur G, Cave J, Wadsley J, Cummins S, Farrugia D, Starling N, Wall L, Saharan R, Valle J. UK phase IV, observational study to assess quality of life in patients (pts) with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (pNETS) receiving treatment with everolimus: The “real-world” OBLIQUE study. Ann Oncol 2016. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdw369.22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
40
|
Brédart A, Beaudeau A, Young T, Moura De Alberquerque Melo H, Arraras JI, Friend L, Schmidt H, Tomaszewski KA, Bergenmar M, Anota A, Costantini A, Marchal F, Tomaszewska IM, Vassiliou V, Chie WC, Hureaux J, Conroy T, Ramage J, Bonnetain F, Kulis D, Aaronson NK. The European organization for research and treatment of cancer - satisfaction with cancer care questionnaire: revision and extended application development. Psychooncology 2016; 26:400-404. [DOI: 10.1002/pon.4127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2015] [Revised: 02/05/2016] [Accepted: 03/07/2016] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Brédart
- Psycho-Oncology Unit; Institut Curie; Paris France
- University Paris Descartes; Boulogne Billancourt France
| | | | - Teresa Young
- Lynda Jackson Macmillan Centre; Mount Vernon Cancer Centre; London UK
| | | | | | - Liz Friend
- Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital; Basingstoke UK
| | - Heike Schmidt
- Institute for Health and Nursing Science; Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg; Halle-Wittenberg Germany
| | - Krzysztof A. Tomaszewski
- Department of Anatomy; Jagiellonian University Medical College; Krakow Poland
- 5 Military Clinical Hospital; Krakow Poland
| | - Mia Bergenmar
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Center for Digestive Diseases; Karolinska University Hospital; Stockholm Sweden
| | - Amélie Anota
- Methodology and Quality of Life in Oncology Unit (EA 3181), National Quality of Life and Cancer Clinical Research Platform; CHU; Besançon France
| | - Anna Costantini
- Psychoncology Unit, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology; Sapienza University of Rome; Rome Italy
| | - Frédéric Marchal
- Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Surgery Department, CRAN, UMR 7039; Lorraine University, CNRS; Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy France
| | - Iwona M. Tomaszewska
- Department of Medical Education; Jagiellonian University Medical College; Krakow Poland
| | | | - Wei-Chu Chie
- Institute of Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health; National Taiwan University; Taipei Taiwan
| | - José Hureaux
- Pneumology Department; CHU Angers; Angers France
- Angers University; Angers France
| | - Thierry Conroy
- Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Medical Oncology Department and EA 4360; Lorraine University; Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy France
| | - John Ramage
- Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital; Basingstoke UK
| | - Franck Bonnetain
- Methodology and Quality of Life in Oncology Unit (EA 3181), National Quality of Life and Cancer Clinical Research Platform; CHU; Besançon France
| | | | - Neil K. Aaronson
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology; The Netherlands Cancer Institute; Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Wolin EM, Jarzab B, Eriksson B, Walter T, Toumpanakis C, Morse MA, Tomassetti P, Weber MM, Fogelman DR, Ramage J, Poon D, Gadbaw B, Li J, Pasieka JL, Mahamat A, Swahn F, Newell-Price J, Mansoor W, Öberg K. Phase III study of pasireotide long-acting release in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors and carcinoid symptoms refractory to available somatostatin analogues. Drug Des Devel Ther 2015; 9:5075-86. [PMID: 26366058 PMCID: PMC4562767 DOI: 10.2147/dddt.s84177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 141] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
In a randomized, double-blind, Phase III study, we compared pasireotide long-acting release (pasireotide LAR) with octreotide long-acting repeatable (octreotide LAR) in managing carcinoid symptoms refractory to first-generation somatostatin analogues. Adults with carcinoid tumors of the digestive tract were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive pasireotide LAR (60 mg) or octreotide LAR (40 mg) every 28 days. Primary outcome was symptom control based on frequency of bowel movements and flushing episodes. Objective tumor response was a secondary outcome. Progression-free survival (PFS) was calculated in a post hoc analysis. Adverse events were recorded. At the time of a planned interim analysis, the data monitoring committee recommended halting the study because of a low predictive probability of showing superiority of pasireotide over octreotide for symptom control (n=43 pasireotide LAR, 20.9%; n=45 octreotide LAR, 26.7%; odds ratio, 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.27–1.97; P=0.53). Tumor control rate at month 6 was 62.7% with pasireotide and 46.2% with octreotide (odds ratio, 1.96; 95% CI, 0.89–4.32; P=0.09). Median (95% CI) PFS was 11.8 months (11.0 – not reached) with pasireotide versus 6.8 months (5.6 – not reached) with octreotide (hazard ratio, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.20–0.98; P=0.045). The most frequent drug-related adverse events (pasireotide vs octreotide) included hyperglycemia (28.3% vs 5.3%), fatigue (11.3% vs 3.5%), and nausea (9.4% vs 0%). We conclude that, among patients with carcinoid symptoms refractory to available somatostatin analogues, similar proportions of patients receiving pasireotide LAR or octreotide LAR achieved symptom control at month 6. Pasireotide LAR showed a trend toward higher tumor control rate at month 6, although it was statistically not significant, and was associated with a longer PFS than octreotide LAR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward M Wolin
- Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Barbara Jarzab
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Endocrine Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, Gliwice, Poland
| | - Barbro Eriksson
- Department of Medical Sciences, Endocrine Oncology Unit, University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Thomas Walter
- Department of Medical Oncology, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France
| | | | - Michael A Morse
- Department of Medical Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Paola Tomassetti
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University Hospital St Orsola, Bologna, Italy
| | - Matthias M Weber
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - David R Fogelman
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - John Ramage
- Gastroenterology Unit, North Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke, UK
| | - Donald Poon
- Department of Medical Oncology, Raffles Hospital and Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore
| | - Brian Gadbaw
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA
| | - Jiang Li
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA
| | - Janice L Pasieka
- Surgery and Oncology Faculty of Medicine, Foothills Hospital, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Abakar Mahamat
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, CHU de Nice Hôpital de l'Archet 1, Nice, France
| | - Fredrik Swahn
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Universitatssjukhuset, Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - John Newell-Price
- Department of Human Metabolism, School of Medicine and Biomedical Science, The University of Sheffield, and Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Wasat Mansoor
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Kjell Öberg
- Department of Medical Sciences, Endocrine Oncology Unit, University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Basuroy R, Sarker D, Quaglia A, Srirajaskanthan R, Ramage J. Personalized medicine for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a distant dream? International Journal of Endocrine Oncology 2015. [DOI: 10.2217/ije.15.9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Neuroendocrine tumors are heterogeneous cancers that can present with advanced disease. Treatment stratification is often based on limited characterization of tumor behavior from histological grade and imaging assessments. Personalized medicine strategies focus on tailoring therapy through characterization of cancer pathways and the development of biomarkers. This review article explores the current personalized medicine landscape in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, from tissue and circulating biomarkers development through to tumor heterogeneity and reimbursement issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ron Basuroy
- ENETS Neuroendocrine Centre of Excellence, Institute of Liver studies, King's College Hospital, London, SE5 9RS, UK
| | - Debashis Sarker
- ENETS Neuroendocrine Centre of Excellence, Institute of Liver studies, King's College Hospital, London, SE5 9RS, UK
- Department of Research Oncology, Division of Cancer Studies, King's College London, Strand, WC2R 2LS, UK
| | - Alberto Quaglia
- ENETS Neuroendocrine Centre of Excellence, Institute of Liver studies, King's College Hospital, London, SE5 9RS, UK
- Histopathology Department, Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London, SE5 9RS, UK
| | - Rajaventhan Srirajaskanthan
- ENETS Neuroendocrine Centre of Excellence, Institute of Liver studies, King's College Hospital, London, SE5 9RS, UK
- Gastroenterology Department, University Hospital Lewisham, London, SE13 6LH, UK
| | - John Ramage
- ENETS Neuroendocrine Centre of Excellence, Institute of Liver studies, King's College Hospital, London, SE5 9RS, UK
- Gastroenterology Department, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Hampshire, RG24 9NA, UK
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Pavel M, Hörsch D, Caplin M, Ramage J, Seufferlein T, Valle J, Banks P, Lapuerta P, Sands A, Zambrowicz B, Fleming D, Wiedenmann B. Telotristat etiprate for carcinoid syndrome: a single-arm, multicenter trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2015; 100:1511-9. [PMID: 25636046 DOI: 10.1210/jc.2014-2247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Carcinoid syndrome (CS) is associated with elevated serotonin, diarrhea, flushing, and increased risk of valvular heart disease. Many patients respond to somatostatin analogs initially, but response diminishes in most patients. Additional options are needed. OBJECTIVE To assess whether telotristat etiprate (TE) can reduce gastrointestinal symptoms in CS and reduce urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (u5-HIAA; a biomarker of serotonin). DESIGN A prospective, exploratory, dose-escalating 12-week, open-label, multicenter study of TE with efficacy and safety analyses. SETTING A multicenter study. PATIENTS Eligible patients had metastatic, well-differentiated, neuroendocrine tumors and CS with ≥ four bowel movements (BMs) per day. Somatostatin analog use was allowed. INTERVENTIONS TE, a novel oral inhibitor of peripheral serotonin synthesis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Primary: safety. Secondary: daily BMs, stool form, and u5-HIAA. RESULTS Fifteen patients were enrolled, and 14 completed the treatment period. All patients experienced reductions in BMs per day (mean decrease, 43.5%). A 74.2% mean reduction in u5-HIAA, the main metabolite of serotonin, was observed, with generally greater reductions in patients with greater reductions in BMs per day. Nine patients (75%) reported "adequate relief" of gastrointestinal symptoms at 12 weeks, compared with two (17%) at baseline. Stool form and flushing also improved. Adverse events were mostly gastrointestinal (n = 10; 67%), consistent with underlying illness; three adverse events were serious (abdominal pain, diarrhea, and gastroenteritis) but were judged unrelated. CONCLUSION TE was generally safe and well tolerated. Patients experienced substantial improvement in CS and reductions in u5-HIAA, consistent with the mechanism of action of TE. These results support further evaluation in phase 3 studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marianne Pavel
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin (M.P., B.W.), Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 13353 Berlin Germany; Zentralklinik Bad Berka GmbH (D.H.), Department of Gastroenterology and Endocrinology, 99437 Bad Berka, Germany; Royal Free London National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust (M.C.), Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatobiliary Medicine, London NW3 2QG, United Kingdom; Basingstoke and North Hampshire NHS Foundation Trust (J.R.), Department of Gastroenterology, Hampshire RG24 9NA, United Kingdom; Ulm University (T.S.), Department of Internal Medicine I, 89070 Ulm, Germany; The University of Manchester/The Christie NHS Foundation Trust (J.V.), Department of Medical Oncology, Manchester M20 4BX, United Kingdom; and Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc (P.B., P.L., A.S., B.Z., D.F.), Department of Clinical Development, The Woodlands, Texas 77381
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Caplin ME, Baudin E, Ferolla P, Filosso P, Garcia-Yuste M, Lim E, Oberg K, Pelosi G, Perren A, Rossi RE, Travis WD, Capdevila J, Costa F, Cwikla J, de Herder W, Delle Fave G, Eriksson B, Falconi M, Ferone D, Gross D, Grossman A, Ito T, Jensen R, Kaltsas G, Kelestimur F, Kianmanesh R, Knigge U, Kos-Kudla B, Krenning E, Mitry E, Nicolson M, O'Connor J, O'Toole D, Pape UF, Pavel M, Ramage J, Raymond E, Rindi G, Rockall A, Ruszniewski P, Salazar R, Scarpa A, Sedlackova E, Sundin A, Toumpanakis C, Vullierme MP, Weber W, Wiedenmann B, Zheng-Pei Z. Pulmonary neuroendocrine (carcinoid) tumors: European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society expert consensus and recommendations for best practice for typical and atypical pulmonary carcinoids. Ann Oncol 2015; 26:1604-20. [PMID: 25646366 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdv041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 387] [Impact Index Per Article: 43.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2014] [Accepted: 01/22/2015] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pulmonary carcinoids (PCs) are rare tumors. As there is a paucity of randomized studies, this expert consensus document represents an initiative by the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society to provide guidance on their management. PATIENTS AND METHODS Bibliographical searches were carried out in PubMed for the terms 'pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors', 'bronchial neuroendocrine tumors', 'bronchial carcinoid tumors', 'pulmonary carcinoid', 'pulmonary typical/atypical carcinoid', and 'pulmonary carcinoid and diagnosis/treatment/epidemiology/prognosis'. A systematic review of the relevant literature was carried out, followed by expert review. RESULTS PCs are well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors and include low- and intermediate-grade malignant tumors, i.e. typical (TC) and atypical carcinoid (AC), respectively. Contrast CT scan is the diagnostic gold standard for PCs, but pathology examination is mandatory for their correct classification. Somatostatin receptor imaging may visualize nearly 80% of the primary tumors and is most sensitive for metastatic disease. Plasma chromogranin A can be increased in PCs. Surgery is the treatment of choice for PCs with the aim of removing the tumor and preserving as much lung tissue as possible. Resection of metastases should be considered whenever possible with curative intent. Somatostatin analogs are the first-line treatment of carcinoid syndrome and may be considered as first-line systemic antiproliferative treatment in unresectable PCs, particularly of low-grade TC and AC. Locoregional or radiotargeted therapies should be considered for metastatic disease. Systemic chemotherapy is used for progressive PCs, although cytotoxic regimens have demonstrated limited effects with etoposide and platinum combination the most commonly used, however, temozolomide has shown most clinical benefit. CONCLUSIONS PCs are complex tumors which require a multidisciplinary approach and long-term follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M E Caplin
- Neuroendocrine Tumour Unit, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - E Baudin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Endocrine Cancer and Interventional Radiology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Université Paris Sud, Villejuif Cedex, France
| | - P Ferolla
- NET Center, Umbria Regional Cancer Network, Università degli Studi di Perugia, Perugia
| | - P Filosso
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - M Garcia-Yuste
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Clinic Hospital, Valladolid, Spain
| | - E Lim
- Imperial College and The Academic Division of Thoracic Surgery, The Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK
| | - K Oberg
- Endocrine Oncology Unit, Department of Medicine, University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - G Pelosi
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori and Dipartimento di Scienze Biologiche e Cliniche Luigi Sacco, Università degli studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - A Perren
- Institute of Pathology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - R E Rossi
- Neuroendocrine Tumour Unit, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico and Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - W D Travis
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Affiliation(s)
- Jian Wu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Wolin EM, Jarzab B, Eriksson B, Walter T, Toumpanakis C, Morse M, Tomassetti P, Weber M, Fogelman DR, Ramage J, Poon D, Huang JM, Hudson M, Zhi X, Pasieka JL, Mahamat A, Swahn F, Newell-Price J, Mansoor W, Oberg KE. A multicenter, randomized, blinded, phase III study of pasireotide LAR versus octreotide LAR in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (NET) with disease-related symptoms inadequately controlled by somatostatin analogs. J Clin Oncol 2013. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2013.31.15_suppl.4031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
4031 Background: The novel somatostatin analog (SSA) pasireotide has a broader binding profile than currently available SSA (octreotide and lanreotide). Results from a phase III study (NCT00690430) of pasireotide LAR (P) vs octreotide LAR (O) in patients (pts) with NET and disease-related symptoms uncontrolled by the maximum approved dose of available SSA are shown. Methods: Pts (N=110) were randomized and stratified by predominant symptom at baseline (diarrhea [D], flushing [F], or D+F) 1:1 to P (60 mg IM) or O (40 mg IM) q28d. Primary objective was symptom response at month (M) 6. Secondary objectives included tumor response and safety. Progression-free survival (PFS) was an exploratory analysis. Results: 53 and 57 pts were enrolled in the P and O arms when the study was halted due to an interim analysis suggesting futility for symptom response. Baseline characteristics were similar between arms. Majority of primary tumor locations were small intestine (72% and 81% in the P and O arms). Symptom response at M6 was 9/43 (21%) and 12/45 (27%) in the P and O arms, odds ratio 0.73 (95% CI, 0.27-1.97; p=0.53). Median numbers of D/day and F/2 weeks and change in symptom from baseline to M6 are in Table. Hyperglycemia (11% vs 0%), diarrhea (9% vs 7%), and abdominal pain (2% vs 9%) were the most common grade 3/4 AEs in the P vs O arms in the core phase, and 7 (13%) and 4 (7%) pts discontinued due to AEs. Median investigator-assessed PFS was 11.8 months and 6.8 months in the P and O arms (HR=0.46; p=0.045). Conclusions: P and O showed a similar safety profile except for the higher frequency of hyperglycemia in P. Pts on P had PFS 5 months longer than pts on O (investigator assessment), despite no differences in symptom response rates. These results warrant a large phase III trial to clarify the role of P as a therapy for NET. Clinical trial information: NCT00690430. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Barbara Jarzab
- Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Gliwice, Poland
| | | | - Thomas Walter
- Hospices Civils de Lyon & Université Claude Bernard Lyon-Est, Lyon, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | - John Ramage
- Hampshire Hospitals NHS, Basingstoke, United Kingdom
| | - Donald Poon
- Raffles Hospital, Singapore & Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | | | | | - Xin Zhi
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp, Florham Park, NJ
| | | | | | | | | | - Wasat Mansoor
- Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Roberts RE, Zhao M, Whitelaw BC, Ramage J, Diaz-Cano S, le Roux CW, Quaglia A, Huang GC, Aylwin SJB. GLP-1 and glucagon secretion from a pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor causing diabetes and hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2012; 97:3039-45. [PMID: 22774207 DOI: 10.1210/jc.2011-2005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) is a gut peptide that promotes insulin release from pancreatic β-cells and stimulates β-cell hyperplasia. GLP-1 secretion causing hypoglycemia has been described once from an ovarian neuroendocrine tumor (NET) but has not been reported from a pancreatic NET (pNET). OBJECTIVE A 56-yr-old male with a previous diagnosis of diabetes presented with fasting hypoglycemia and was found to have a metastatic pNET secreting glucagon. Neither the primary tumor nor metastases stained for insulin, whereas the resected normal pancreas showed histological evidence of islet cell hyperplasia. We provide evidence that GLP-1 secretion from the tumor was the cause of hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia. METHODS GLP-1 levels were determined in the patient, and immunohistochemistry for GLP-1 was performed on the tumor metastases. Ex vivo tissue culture and a bioassay constructed by transplantation of tumor into nude mice were performed to examine the tumor secretory products and their effects on islet cell function. RESULTS The patient had high levels of glucagon and GLP-1 with an exaggerated GLP-1 response to oral glucose. Immunohistochemistry and primary tissue culture demonstrated secretion of glucagon and GLP-1 from the tumor metastases, whereas insulin secretion was almost undetectable. Ex vivo coculture of the tumor with normal human islets resulted in inhibition of insulin release, and transplanted mice developed impaired glucose tolerance. CONCLUSIONS This is the first description of glucagon and GLP-1 secretion from a metastatic pNET causing sequential diabetes and hypoglycemia. Hypoglycemia was caused by insulin secretion from hyperplastic β-cells stimulated by tumor-derived GLP-1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel E Roberts
- King's College London School of Medicine, London SE1 1UL, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Parkes J, Roderick P, Harris S, Day C, Mutimer D, Collier J, Lombard M, Alexander G, Ramage J, Dusheiko G, Wheatley M, Gough C, Burt A, Rosenberg W. Enhanced liver fibrosis test can predict clinical outcomes in patients with chronic liver disease. Gut 2010; 59:1245-51. [PMID: 20675693 DOI: 10.1136/gut.2009.203166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 228] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinicians use fibrosis in a liver biopsy to predict clinical outcomes of chronic liver disease. The performance of non-invasive tests has been evaluated against histological assessment of fibrosis but use of clinical outcomes as the reference standard would be ideal. The enhanced liver fibrosis (ELF) test was derived and validated in a large cohort of patients and shown to have high diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve (AUC)=0.80 95% CI 0.76 to 0.85) in identification of significant fibrosis on biopsy. OBJECTIVE To evaluate ELF performance in predicting clinical outcomes by following up the original ELF cohort. METHODS Patients recruited to the ELF study at seven English centres were followed up for liver morbidity and mortality by examination of clinical data. Defaulting/discharged patients were followed up by family practitioner questionnaires. Primary outcome measure was liver-related morbidity/liver-related death. RESULTS 457 patients were followed up (median 7 years), with ascertainment of clinical status in 92%. There were 61 liver-related outcomes (39 deaths). Survival analysis showed that the ELF score predicts liver outcomes, with people having the highest ELF scores being significantly more likely to have clinical outcomes than those in lower-score groups. A Cox proportional hazards model showed fully adjusted HRs of 75 (ELF score 12.52-16.67), 20 (10.426-12.51) and 5 (8.34-10.425) compared with patients with ELF <8.34. A unit change in ELF is associated with a doubling of risk of liver-related outcome. CONCLUSIONS An ELF test can predict clinical outcomes in patients with chronic liver disease and may be a useful prognostic tool in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Parkes
- Public Health Sciences and Medical Statistics (MP805) South Academic Block Southampton General Hospital, Southampton SO53 1ER, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Popple A, Ramage J, Spendlove I, Durrant L. 291 Do regulatory T cells require cognate MHC/peptide recognition for endothelial transmigration? EJC Suppl 2010. [DOI: 10.1016/s1359-6349(10)71095-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
|
50
|
Kos-Kudła B, O'Toole D, Falconi M, Gross D, Klöppel G, Sundin A, Ramage J, Oberg K, Wiedenmann B, Komminoth P, Van Custem E, Mallath M, Papotti M, Caplin M. ENETS consensus guidelines for the management of bone and lung metastases from neuroendocrine tumors. Neuroendocrinology 2010; 91:341-50. [PMID: 20484875 DOI: 10.1159/000287255] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2009] [Accepted: 02/03/2010] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Beata Kos-Kudła
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pathophysiology and Endocrinology, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|