Insights on safety and efficacy of renal artery denervation for uncontrolled-resistant hypertension in a high risk population with chronic kidney disease: first Italian real-world experience

Management of drug-resistant hypertension as a heterogeneous disorder

Approximately 1.3 billion adults globally have hypertension, and are at higher risk of death associated with cardiovascular disease. Adjusted death rate primarily due to high blood pressure is 31.3 per 100,000. The prevalence of drug-resistant hypertension is estimated to be up to 20 % in hypertensive individuals, and is more common in those with chronic kidney disease and obstructive sleep apnea. It occurs in individuals on ≥3 antihypertensive drugs including a diuretic. The addition of spironolactone, as a fourth drug has been found at times to be effective in management of blood pressure. Other strategies include sequential nephron block (e.g., spironolactone + furosemide + amiloride), and use of drugs such as alpha2 agonists, endothelin antagonists, and nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid antagonists. Use of positive airway pressure and pharmacotherapy have been found to be of value in individuals with sleep apnea in lowering blood pressure. In contrast, baroreceptor stimulation and/or renal denervation combined with pharmacotherapy seem to offer little in a way of consistent efficacy of optimally lowering blood pressures. Remarkably, evidence in the literature strongly supports the view that life style changes including regular exercise and appropriate diet combined with pharmacotherapy can lead to positive outcomes in helping to significantly reduce blood pressure. There is also ample data in literature suggesting the non-compliance to antihypertensive medications as a significant barrier to lowering blood pressure in this group. Accordingly, education regarding pharmacotherapy, and appropriate exercise regimen, including changes to diet should underpin any strategy in the management of high blood pressure in this population.

Revisiting resistant hypertension in kidney disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

As compared to controlled or uncontrolled hypertension, resistant hypertension in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) poses a significantly increased healthcare burden due to greater target end-organ damage including cardiovascular disease and CKD progression. Patients with CKD have two to three times higher risk of developing resistant hypertension. True resistant hypertension needs to be distinguished from apparent treatment resistant hypertension (aTRH); however, it is usually not possible in epidemiological studies. Moreover, impact of contemporary guidelines changes in the target blood pressure (BP) goal to less than 130/80 mmHg remains to be determined.

RECENT FINDINGS

Up to half of patients with CKD meet aTRH criteria using 2017 ACC/AHA target BP less than 130/80 mmHg. Excess sodium retention in extracellular and tissue compartment remains the cornerstone cause of resistance to the treatment in CKD. Maximizing and optimizing the diuretic regimen in addition to dietary sodium restriction plays a critical role in these patients. Management requires a trustworthy provider-patient relationship facilitating identification and intervention for the barriers restricting the uptake of lifestyle modifications and medications. Recently, renal denervation has been approved and many other novel agents are on the horizon for treatment of true resistant hypertension associated with CKD.

SUMMARY

This review discusses the latest in the pathophysiology, definition, identification and treatment strategies of resistant hypertension in individuals with CKD. Further investigations are required to identify the prevalence, future implication and treatment outcome data for true resistant hypertension associated with CKD.

Italian Society of Interventional Cardiology (GISE) and Italian Society of Arterial Hypertension (SIIA) Position Paper on the role of renal denervation in the management of the difficult-to-treat hypertension

Renal denervation (RDN) is a safe and effective strategy for the treatment of difficult to treat hypertension. The blood pressure (BP)-lowering efficacy of RDN is comparable to those of many single antihypertensive medications and it allows to consider the RDN as a valuable option for the treatment of difficult to treat hypertension together with lifestyle modifications and medical therapy. A multidisciplinary team is of pivotal importance from the selection of the patient candidate for the procedure to the post-procedural management. Further studies are needed to investigate the effect of RDN on clinical outcomes and to better identify the predictors of BP response to RDN in order to recognize the patients who are more likely to benefit from the procedure.

Renal denervation in the management of hypertension

Arterial hypertension is a global leading cause of cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, and renal disease, as well as mortality. Although pharmacotherapy is safe and effective in lowering blood pressure (BP) and cardiovascular disease risk, BP control remains poor, and the mortality rates associated with high BP have been steadily increasing. Device-based therapies have been investigated to overcome barriers to pharmacotherapy, including non-adherence and low rates of persistence to daily medications. Among these device-based therapies, catheter-based renal denervation (RDN) has been most extensively examined over the past 15 years. In this state-of-the-art article, we summarise the rationale for RDN, review the available evidence, provide recommendations for a safe procedure, and discuss the role of RDN in current guidelines and clinical practice.

The feasibility, efficacy, and safety of RDN procedure using CO2 angiography through radial artery in severe chronic kidney disease patients

The recent evidence regarding the effectiveness of renal denervation (RDN) in blood pressure control is becoming increasingly substantial. However, many studies have excluded populations with severely impaired kidney function, even though these individuals have a higher prevalence of hypertension compared to the general population, and controlling their blood pressure is more challenging. The effectiveness and safety of RDN in patients with severe chronic kidney disease (CKD) lack strong evidence support. Concerns about worsening kidney function still exist, particularly in patients with CKD stage 5. We conducted an observational study involving 10 patients who were using at least 3 different antihypertensive medications and had an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 45 mL/min/1.73 m2 but had not undergone dialysis. For these patients, we performed RDN via the radial artery approach, with the assistance of carbon dioxide (CO2) angiography. Utilizing this approach, the systolic 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring did not exhibit a significant decrease at 3 months; however, a significant reduction was observed at 6 months after RDN. We also minimized contrast agent usage, observed no kidney function decline 3 months post-RDN, and experienced no vascular-related complications. Using the radial artery approach and CO2 angiography assistance for RDN may be an effective and safe blood pressure control method for patients with severe kidney impairment.

Management of Resistant Hypertension

Resistant hypertension (RH) is a severe form of hypertension associated with increased cardiovascular risk. Although true RH affects less than 10% of the patients receiving antihypertensive therapy, the absolute number is high and continues to increase. The workup of these patients requires screening for secondary hypertension and pseudoresistance, including poor adherence to prescribed medicines and the white-coat phenomenon. The treatment of RH consists of lifestyle modifications and pharmacological therapies. Lifestyle modifications include dietary adjustments, weight loss, physical activity, and limiting alcohol consumption; pharmacological therapies include diuretics, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, beta blockers, angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors, and others. Over the last 15 years, interventional approaches have emerged as adjunct treatment options; we highlight catheter-based renal denervation. This review summarizes the rationales and latest clinical evidence and, based thereon, proposes an updated algorithm for the management of RH.

Effects of renal denervation on kidney function in patients with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The present study aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes following renal denervation (RDN) for hypertensive patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Prospective studies published between January 1, 2010 and November 15, 2022 where systematically identified for RDN outcomes on office and ambulatory blood pressure, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), creatinine and procedural characteristics from three online databases (Medline, PubMed, EMBASE). Random effects model to combine risk ratios and mean differences was used. Where possible, clinical outcomes were pooled and analyzed at 6, 12 and 24 months. Significance was set at p ≤ 0.05. 11 prospective trials, with a total of 226 patients with treatment resistant HTN receiving RDN met the inclusion criteria. Age ranged from 42.5 ± 13.8 to 66 ± 9. Main findings of this review included a reduction in systolic and diastolic office blood pressure at 6 [-19.8 (p < 0.00001)/-15.2 mm Hg (p < 0.00001)] and 12 months [-21.2 (p < 0.00001)/-9.86 mm Hg (p < 0.0005)] follow-up compared to baseline. This was also seen in systolic and diastolic 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure at 6 [-9.77 (p = 0.05)/-3.64 mm Hg (p = 0.09)] and 12 months [-13.42 (p = 0.0007)/-6.30 mm Hg (p = 0.001)] follow-up compared to baseline. The reduction in systolic and diastolic 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure was maintained to 24 months [(-16.30 (p = 0.0002)/-6.84 mm Hg (p = 0.0010)]. Analysis of kidney function through eGFR demonstrated non-significant results at 6 (+1.60 mL/min/1.73 m2, p = 0.55), 12 (+5.27 mL/min/1.73 m2, p = 0.17), and 24 months (+7.19 mL/min/1.73 m2, p = 0.36) suggesting an interruption in natural CKD progression. Similar results were seen in analysis of serum creatinine at 6 (+0.120 mg/dL, p = 0.41), 12 (+0.100 mg/dL, p = 0.70), and 24 months (+0.07 mg/dL, p = 0.88). Assessment of procedural complications deemed RDN in a CKD cohort to be safe with an overall complication rate of 4.86%. With the current advances in RDN and its utility in multiple chronic diseases beyond hypertension, the current study summarizes critical findings that further substantiate the literature regarding the potential of such an intervention to be incorporated as an effective treatment for resistant hypertension and CKD.

Renal Denervation in the Treatment of Resistant Hypertension and Difficult-to-Control Hypertension - Consensus Document of the Croatian Hypertension League - Croatian Society of Hypertension, Croatian Cardiac Society, Croatian Endovascular Initiative, Croatian Society for Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases, Croatian Renal Association, and Croatian Society of Family Physicians of the Croatian Medical Association

Renal denervation (RDN) as a method of treating arterial hypertension (AH) was introduced in Croatia in 2012. A multidisciplinary team and a network of hospitals that diagnose and treat patients with severe forms of AH were established, and a very strict diagnostic-treatment algorithm was prepared. At monthly meetings patients with truly resistant hypertension who were candidates for RDN were discussed. According to the 2021 ESH position statement and 2023 ESH guidelines, RDN is considered an alternative and additional, not a competitive method of treating patients with various forms of AH which must be performed by following a structured procedure and the patient's preference should be considered. In view of the changes in the global scientific community, the Croatian Hypertension League brings this consensus document on RDN conducted with radiofrequency-based catheter, the only currently available method in Croatia. In this document, exclusion and inclusion criteria are shown, as well as three groups of patients in whom RDN could be considered. The new diagnostic-treatment algorithm is prepared and follow-up procedure is explained. In Croatia, RDN is reimbursed by the national insurance company, thus pharmacoeconomic analyses is also shown. Criteria required by an individual centre to be approved of RDN are listed, and plans for prospective research on RDN in Croatia, including the Croatian registry for RDN, are discussed.

Catheter-based renal artery denervation: facts and expectations

Catheter-based renal artery denervation (RAD) is entering a new era. After the disappointing results of SYMPLICITY-HTN 3 trial in year 2014, several technical and methodological advancements led to execution of important SHAM-controlled randomized trials with promising results. Now, the 2023 ESH Guidelines give RAD a class of recommendation II with a Level of Evidence B. Currently, catheter-based RAD has two main areas of application: (a) Hypertensive patients who are still untreated, in whom RAD is a sort of a first-line treatment; (b) Difficult-to-control or true resistant hypertensive patients. Notably, randomized SHAM-controlled trials met their primary end-point in both these conditions. So far, we do not dispose of established predictors of the antihypertensive response to RAD. Some data suggest that younger patients with systo-diastolic hypertension, absence of diffuse atherosclerosis and evidence of sympathetic nervous system overactivity experience a better BP response to the procedure. We reviewed the available data on catheter-based RAD and included an updated meta-analysis of the results of the available SHAM-controlled trials. Overall, the reduction in 24-h systolic blood pressure (BP) after RAD exceeded that after SHAM by 4.58 mmHg (95% CI 3.07-6.10) in untreated patients, and by 3.82 mmHg (95% CI 2.46-5.18) in treated patients, without significant heterogeneity across trials, patient phenotype (untreated versus treated patients) and technique (radiofrequency versus ultrasound). There were no important safety signals related to the procedure. Notably, some data suggest that RAD could be an effective additional approach in patients with atrial fibrillation and other conditions characterized by sympathetic nervous system overactivity.

Clinical event reductions in high-risk patients after renal denervation projected from the global SYMPLICITY registry

AIMS

Renal denervation has been shown to lower blood pressure in sham-controlled trials and represents a device-based treatment option for hypertension. We sought to project clinical event reductions after radiofrequency renal denervation using a novel modelling approach.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The Global SYMPLICITY Registry is a global, prospective all-comer registry to evaluate safety and efficacy after renal denervation. For this analysis, change in office systolic blood pressure from baseline was calculated from reported follow-up in the Global SYMPLICITY Registry. Relative risks for death and other cardiovascular events as well as numbers needed to treat for event avoidance were obtained for the respective blood pressure reductions based on previously reported meta-regression analyses for the full cohort and high-risk subgroups including type 2 diabetes, chronic kidney disease, resistant hypertension, and high basal cardiovascular risk. Average baseline office systolic blood pressure and reduction estimates for the full cohort (N = 2651) were 166±25 and -14.8 ± 0.4 mmHg, respectively. Mean reductions in blood pressure ranged from -11.0--21.8 mmHg for the studied high-risk subgroups. Projected relative risks ranged from 0.57 for stroke in the resistant hypertension cohort to 0.92 for death in the diabetes cohort. Significant absolute reductions in major adverse cardiovascular events over 3 years compared with the projected control (8.6 ± 0.7% observed vs. 11.7 ± 0.9% for projected control; P < 0.01) were primarily due to reduced stroke incidence. The robustness of findings was confirmed in sensitivity and scenario analyses.

CONCLUSION

Model-based projections suggest radiofrequency renal denervation for patients with uncontrolled hypertension adds considerable clinical benefit across a spectrum of different cohort characteristics.

Renal Denervation: A Practical Guide for Health Professionals Managing Hypertension

Growing evidence demonstrates the suitability of renal denervation in a broad population of patients; however, questions remain over its suitability and practical implementation. Given the rapidity of emerging data, this has been a challenging field for potential adopters to navigate. The purpose of this article is twofold: to provide navigation through emerging clinical data and evolving guidance; and to provide physicians with practical, evidence-based advice for identifying eligible patients and providing appropriate management in the pre- and postintervention settings. Although many of these recommendations are based on existing published guidance documents, we reflect equally on our own experiences of using this technology.

Insight on Efficacy of Renal Artery Denervation for Refractory Hypertension with Chronic Kidney Diseases: A Long-Term Follow-Up of 24-Hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure

Aims

To explore the long-term efficacy and safety of renal denervation in patients with RHT and CKD, a post hoc analysis of eGFR subgroups was completed.

Methods

Fifty-four patients with refractory hypertension with chronic kidney disease were treated with RDN and enrolled in the study. Patients were divided into three groups according to eGFR: eGFR 46–90 ml/min group, eGFR 15–45 ml/min group, and eGFR <15 ml/min group. The planned follow-up period was 48 months to assess 24 h ambulatory blood pressure, renal function, type of antihypertensive medication, and RDN complications.

Results

The ablation sites of the GFR 46–90 ml/min group and GFR 15–45 ml/min group were 32.57 ± 2.99 and 29.53 ± 5.47, respectively. No complications occurred in the GFR 46–90 ml/min group. The GFR<15 ml/min group was treated with 27.07 ± 5.59  ablation. Renal artery dissection occurred in each group of GFR 15–45 ml/min and GFR <15 ml/min. And renal stent implantation artery was performed on these two patients. No severe renal artery stenosis occurred. There were no significant differences in Scr and eGFR between the three groups at each follow-up point. Compared with baseline, SBP was significantly of each group decreased to varying degrees at each follow-up time point. SBP decreased most in the GFR 46–90 ml/min group. Compared with baseline, the type of antihypertensive drugs used in the GFR46-90 ml/min group decreased significantly except for 36 and 48 months. At 48 months' postadmission, there was a significant decrease in the type of antihypertensive medication used in the GFR15-45 ml/min group, and there was no significant decrease in the type of antihypertensive medication used in the GFR<15 ml/min group.

Conclusions

RDN can safely reduce SBP in CKD patients combined with RHT for 48 months, with the most pronounced reduction in the GFR15-45 ml/min group. The variety of antihypertensive drugs was significantly reduced after RDN. This was particularly evident in patients with GFR 15–45 ml/min.

Update on Renal Sympathetic Denervation for the Treatment of Hypertension

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Hypertension is a leading risk factor for all-cause mortality in adults; however, medication non-adherence and intolerance present an enormous treatment challenge. Given the critical role of renal sympathetic nerves in neurogenic control of blood pressure and pathophysiology of hypertension, renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) has been explored as a therapeutic strategy in hypertension treatment over the last 15 years. In this review, we will discuss the role of renal sympathetic nerves in the pathophysiology of hypertension, provide an update on the available evidence regarding the short- and long-term safety and effectiveness of RDN in the treatment of hypertension, and consider its future perspectives.

RECENT FINDINGS

RDN is a percutaneous endovascular catheter-based neuromodulation approach that enables ablation of renal sympathetic nerve fibers within the adventitial layer of the renal arteries using radiofrequency (most extensively studied), ultrasound energy, or neurolytics (e.g., alcohol). In the last decade, advancements in procedural techniques and well-designed sham-controlled trials utilizing 24-h ambulatory blood pressure measurements have demonstrated that RDN has an excellent safety profile and results in a modest reduction of blood pressure, in a wide range of hypertensive phenotypes (mild to resistant), irrespective of antihypertensive drug use and this effect is sustained over a 3-year period. Superiority of a particular RDN modality has not been yet established. Despite strong evidence demonstrating efficacy and safety of RDN, current data does not support its use as a primary approach in the treatment of hypertension due to its modest treatment effect and concerns around long-term sustainability. Perhaps the best utility of RDN is in hypertensives intolerant to antihypertensive medications or as an adjunct to aldosterone antagonists in the management of resistant hypertension. Patient selection will be critical to demonstrate a meaningful benefit of RDN. Future well-designed studies are necessary to determine predictors and measures of response to RDN, long-term efficacy given question of renal nerve regeneration, comparison of available technologies, safety in patients with advanced kidney disease, and improvement in patient quality of life measures.